# Dropping Trust in Pharmaceuticals **URL:** \ **Category:** Positive Changes That Are Occurring\ **Created:** [January 13, 2021, 4:19pm UTC](https://forum.orgones.co.uk/t/dropping-trust-in-pharmaceuticals/5379 "2021-01-13T16:19:38Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![JeffMiller](https://forum.orgones.co.uk/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/e495f1/32.png) [@JeffMiller](https://forum.orgones.co.uk/u/JeffMiller)\ **Post date:** [January 13, 2021, 4:19pm UTC](https://forum.orgones.co.uk/t/dropping-trust-in-pharmaceuticals/5379/1 "2021-01-13T16:19:38Z")
**DROPPING TRUST IN PHARMACEUTICALS** Great positive changes are underway at every level of our reality. They began in earnest in 2012, and have been increasing in speed and magnitude. I began writing this series of articles, entitled "Positive Changes That Are Occurring", in July of 2013. These historically-unprecedented positive changes are being driven by many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices based on the work of Wilhelm Reich and Karl Hans Welz.  Since Don Croft first fabricated the first simple, inexpensive tactical Orgonite devices in 2000, their widespread, ongoing and ever-increasing distribution has been unknitting and transforming the ancient Death energy matrix built and expanded by our dark masters, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. And, as a result, the Ether is returning to its natural state of health and vitality. So, while it’s not the most positive time right now in a number of ways, there are still gigantic positive changes taking place on a societal level that dwarf the negativities we’re currently experiencing. And one of them is that the populace has recognized that Pharmaceuticals have been weaponized against it.  For example, In 2020, Americans viewed drugmakers more negatively than more than 20 other industries polled, including oil, banking and the federal government, with pharma's net favorability rating reaching an all-time low in the survey's 19-year history. Wholly-credulous rubes no longer! Awareness is inexorably rising because moral and mental health vary directly with that of the ether. Trusted Authority Figures providing things to consume that will purportedly heal you uses a technique seen in the ancient Hawaiian philosophy of “Huna”. If the command is impressive enough to the subconscious, it will heal the body, itself. It’s what drives the “mystery” of what is known as “the placebo effect”. Now, if you drink a glass of cyanide, even without knowing it, that cyanide will kill you dead. But western Pharmaceuticals are basically either ripoffs of naturally occurring cures. For example, aspirin is derived from the bark of several varieties of willow trees, and was and is known as salicin. I only rarely take aspirin, and, in those cases, it works as advertised, because I don’t overuse it chronically. You know, like the Doctors say you should, “to prevent heart attack”. The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “surprised”. That’s why a Mayo Clinic article says “You might be **_surprised_** to learn that stopping daily aspirin therapy can have a rebound effect that may increase your risk of heart attack.” The populace is rediscovering that food is medicine, and that Pharma is basically quackery, here now 150 years on from the “snake oil salesmen” selling patent medicine. Antidepressant use increases the risk for death from any cause by 33% and the risk for new cardiovascular events by 14%. Popular sleeping pills such as Ambien and Restoril increase the risk of early death by 500%.  AstraZeneca’s US Pharmaceutical sales dropped 20% from 2016 to 2017. Sanofi’s 1st-qtr income dropped 10.7% in Q1 2018. Annualized, that would be a 40% decrease in revenue. That’s a gigantic change, a wholesale change, a sea change.  A 2012 study linked popular sleeping pills such as Ambien and Restoril with a nearly five-fold increased risk of early death.   In July 2014, outsourcing-pharma.com said “Baxter Q2: **_Drop_** in demand hits CMO biz, **_despite overall sales growth”._** Where “drop” and “growth” are both general. You can’t get any idea of the scope of either one. It’s an example of the use of a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”. The propagandist knows that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines.  This is summer, 2014, a year after I started writing these articles documenting the great positive changes that began in earnest around 2012. Outsourcing Pharma is a State propaganda outlet, trying their best to spin the news so that you don’t recognize the magnitude of the trend, or even that the trend exists, at all. In September 2014, actuary.com said “Over the last **_few_** years, Medicare patients have been using **_fewer_** expensive medical services, particularly hospital care **_and prescription drugs_**.” Where “fewer” is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here. Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.  The author bravely infers people are continuing to use inexpensive medical services, which is another bid at cutting up and “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon. They put “prescription drugs”, where the biggest drop took place, at the end, to hedge. The revenue of MedTech, a manufacturer and distributor of pharmaceutical products, dropped 26% from 2015 to 2016. A Forbes story from May 2017, on dropping pharma sales at CVS, said “Sales **_fell_** across its generic and specialty **_segments_**.” It’s exactly the same verbiage that the Wall Street Journal used in February 2016 in a story about dropping pharma sales at Teva. It’s how the international news blackout on the subject says you have to say it. And it’s proof that, yes, there is Some Big Conspiracy. The author used “fell” because it’s general. You can’t get any idea of the scope of the drop. It’s an example of the use of a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”. “Fell” was also used because it’s softer than “decreased”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer. Both Forbes and the Wall Street Journal are State propaganda organs, using identical verbiage, techniques and tactics to blunt and defray awareness of the fact that the populace has recognized that pharmaceuticals have been weaponized against them. In February 2016, the Wall Street Journal said “Teva Pharmaceuticals **_Reports_** Sales **_Decline_** ” Where “decline” was used because it is softer than “drop”, and more importantly because it is general. You can’t get any idea of the scope of the drop. It’s an example of the use of a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”. The propagandist knows that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines.  The word “reports” puts Teva firmly in charge, and gives the subconscious of the reader the green light to say “oh, someone must have reported that incorrectly!” The article continues: “Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. **_reported_** a **_decline_** in revenue as **_drug_** sales **_fell_** across its generic and specialty **_segments._** They used “decline” because it’s softer than “drop” or “decrease”, and because it echoes “recline”.  They used “fall” because it’s softer than “drop” or “decrease”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer. In October 2016, the desperately-named fiercepharma.com truthfully said “Drugmakers prowl willing markets for animal antibiotics as U.S. sales **_fall_** ”. Where “fall” was used because it’s general. You can’t get any idea of the scope of the decrease. It’s an example of the use of a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”. The propagandist knows that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines. Fall was also used because it’s softer than “drop” or “decrease”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer. It’s true that drugmakers are prowling, well, everywhere, but it’s false, in that Fierce Pharma is faking that sales are increasing internationally while they are dropping domestically. Which is not in fact the case. Fierce Pharma is a State-sponsored propaganda outlet, trying their best to spin the news so that you don’t recognize the magnitude of the trend, or even that the trend exists, at all. In November 2016, Investors.com said “Teva Pharma **_Outplays_** Peers Despite **_Light_** Q3 Sales, **_Lacking 2017 Clarity_** ”. Where “outplays peers” is Mil-speak for “strongest of all the collapsing Pharma companies”, and where “light” sales is used because it’s general, and because it’s softer than “dropping” or “decreasing”, and because it’s a thinly-veiled reference to the Illuminist Set worshippers who’ve run things in all the nations, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. “Lacking 2017 Clarity” is more Mil-speak, covering up certain doom in 2017 with the false pretense that “it will all clear up in a moment”. Investors.com is an organ of the controlled press, doing what it can to support the international news blackout that is in place on this subject. In December 2016, Bloomerg Gadfly said “Pharma's **_Pricing Troubles_** Will Get **_Worse_** in 2017”. Where “worse” is general. You can’t get any idea of the scope of the drop. It’s an example of the use of a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”. The propagandist knows that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines.  “Pricing troubles” makes it seem like they forgot how to use the price tag gun, or something. It’s a smoke-screen for “catastrophically dropping demand will drop even more catastrophically in 2017.” Remember, when cons collapse, they do so in a rush, like a house of cards. Bloomberg is a State propaganda outlet, trying their best to spin the news so that you don’t recognize the magnitude of the trend, or even that the trend exists, at all. In January 2017, NCPA.org’s Health Policy Blog pretended to be excited by saying “PPI: Pharma Prices Are **_Dropping!_** ” They used “dropping” because it’s general. You can’t get any idea of the scope of the drop, or why it’s occurring. It’s an example of the use of a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”. The propagandist knows that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines.  NCPA is a State-sponsored propaganda outlet, trying their best to spin the news so that you don’t recognize the magnitude of the trend. In January 2017, LinkedIn bravely tried to prop up the already-collapsing pharmaceutical market with “Saudi Arabia - **_Does_** Pharma market in KSA **_really_** face a challenge in 2017 **_?_** ” The first rule of politics is “deny, deny, deny”. LinkedIn is a State-sponsored propaganda outlet, doing the best it can to blunt, deny and defray awareness of the larger trend I’m elucidating here. The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. Two of those variants are “special” and “interesting”. That’s why a PharmaLive article from February 2017 is headlined “ **_Special_** Feature: **_Interesting_** times for pharma sales reps”. Where “interesting” is completely general. You can’t get any idea why they are interesting. It’s an example of the use of a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”. The propagandist knows that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines.  The article goes on to say that “Also, **_cutting health spending budgets_** are causing a **_slowdown in pharmaceutical sales growth_** ”. Where “cutting health spending budgets” is a plausible-deniability excuse, put forward because the propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility. “Slowdown in growth” is Mil-speak for “catastrophically dropping sales”. There are no specific figures, which is another example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”. PharmaLive is a State propaganda outlet, doing whatever it can to blunt and defray awareness of the fact that the pharmaceutical market is in a state of wholesale collapse. In February 2017, Reuters said “Sun Pharma's profits **_drop_** as U.S. sales hit by **_pricing, supply issues”._** Where “drop” is general. You can’t get any idea of how much they dropped. “Pricing, supply issues” is also general. Those are both example of a propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.  The article continues: “Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, India's largest drugmaker, reported its first **_fall_** in quarterly profits in a year on Tuesday, as **_pricing issues and supply constraints_** affected sales in the United States, its largest market. “Pricing issues and supply constraints” is, once again, general. As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda. They’re plausible-deniability excuses, put forward because the propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility. Prices are dropping because demand for pharmaceuticals is decreasing. The author described a “fall” in quarterly profits because it’s general. You can’t get any idea of the scope of the decrease. “Fall” was also used because it’s softer than “drop” and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer. Since the article doesn’t say “makers of the name-brand drugs X and Y”, we may discern that Sun Pharma deals mainly in generics. This exposes the ruse the “competition from generics” is driving down Pharma sales. Reuters is an Organ of the State, doing what it can to enforce the international news blackout that is in place on the wholesale collapse of the pharmaceutical market. In February 2017, Newsweek brazenly claimed “Trump's **_Plan_** for **_Lowering_** Big Pharma Drug Prices Comes at a High Price”.  With the pharmaceutical market in wholesale collapse due to generally increasing awareness of the deadly nature of the products, the folks in charge are _pretending they’re cutting you a brea_k. How they must laugh.  “We **_have_** to get prices down,” the president said in his public introduction. “ **_We have no choice._** ” I live in a country where people believe this shit. But maybe that’s because no one ever explained what was going on to them, before. The great news is that fingering a con artist is not a magical power, and at least some subset of people get with it instantly once a swindler has been pointed out. While another significant but decreasing segment of the population is so heavily programmed and schizoid that they dissociate immediately upon taking in the information. That’s because many or most are eager to grasp any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility. Newsweek is a Mouthpiece of the state, doing what it can to support the international news blackout that is in place on the collapse of the pharmaceuticals confidence game. You know that much of the positive that pharmaceuticals provide is due to the placebo effect, right? A Trusted Authority Figure makes an impression on the subconscious. It’s at the heart of the Hawaiian Huna philosophy, and was used for good by a wide majority of Huna practitioners, but was twisted to the dark side by a small, deviant subset of Black Kahuna’s who brought the Death cult from Tahiti to Hawaii. Pa’ao, who brought the human sacrifice cult, was said to be “light skinned”. A Financial Gazette article from April 2017 is headlined “MedTech suffers revenue **_decline_** ”. Where “decline” was used because it’s softer then drop or decrease, and even more importantly because it’s general. You can’t get any idea of the scope of the drop. It’s an example of the use of a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”. The propagandist knows that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines.  The article continues: “MedTech, a manufacturer and distributor of pharmaceutical products, also bemoaned **_falling_** demand for its wide range of pharmaceutical and beauty products. STRUGGLING pharmaceutical company, MedTech Holdings’s fortunes suffered after the company recorded **a 26 percent revenue drop** to US$9,8 million during the year to December 31, 2016, from US$13,2 million in the prior year.” The going-out-of-business 26% year-over-year decrease in sales was described only-generally in the headline as a “revenue decline”. Where demand was said to be “falling” because it’s softer than “decreasing” or “dropping”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer. The Financial Gazette is a State propaganda outlet, doing what it can to support the international news blackout that is in place on the collapse of the pharmaceutical market. In April 2017, AstraZeneca said “Qq1 2017 **_Results announcement_** ”. Where “results announcement” is completely general. That’s an example of a propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”. The propagandist knows that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines.   The article is, in fact, about a going-out-of-business level drop in pharmaceutical sales. The article continues: “Sales in the US, **_falling_** by 20% to $8m, declined as a result of **_unfavourable pricing_** , **_despite an increase in volume demand_**.” Where “falling” was used because it’s softer than “dropping” and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer. And where “unfavourable pricing” is a plausible-deniability excuse, put forward to keep you from grasping that the populace has recognized that pharmaceuticals have been weaponized against them.  AstraZeneca is doing what it can to adhere to the international news blackout that is in place on this subject. In May 2017, Reuters said “Sun Pharma **_says_** 2018 sales **_may fall_** as **_US_** market gets **_tougher”_** The implication is that only the US market has gotten tougher. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”. The word “tougher” is general. It’s used to blunt any specific insight into the magnitude of the trend. The author has once again “compartmentalized” the phenomenon, as sixty to seventy readers only read the headlines, as the propagandist well knows. The word “fall” was because it’s it’s softer than “drop”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer. But the main reason it was used is because it’s general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here. In May 2017, pfizer.com said “Pfizer's first-quarter sales **drop 2 percent** , **_missing_** targets.” Where “missing” is general. You can’t get any idea of how much they missed them by. That’s an example of a propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.  The article continues: “CEO Ian Read commented "I was **_pleased_** with our first-quarter 2017 financial performance, **_which was in line with our expectations_**." Where Ian is using conscious deception with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty. He was not pleased, and the performance was not in line with expectations, but rather missed performance targets by some obfuscated degree. pfizer.com is a State-sponsored propaganda outlet, trying their best to spin the news so that you don’t recognize the magnitude of the trend, or even that the trend exists, at all. In May 2017, Forbes said “ **_Amid 'Rebuilding Year_** ,' CVS Drugstore Sales **_Drop_** ”. Where “drop” is general. You can’t get any idea of the scope of the drop. It’s an example of the use of a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”. The propagandist knows that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines.  The article goes on to say “Sales **_fell_** across its generic and specialty **_segments_**.” Can you see how they omitted the word “drug” under the false guise of familiarity? That’s to make the subject less searchable. It’s another example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”. The author used “fell” because it’s general. You can’t get any idea of the scope of the drop. It’s an example of the use of a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”. “Fell” was also used because it’s softer than “decreased”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer. A Wall Street Journal story from 2016, on dropping phamra sales at Teva, said “Sales fell across its generic and specialty segments.” It’s exactly the same verbiage. It’s how the international news blackout on the subject says you have to say it. And it’s proof that, yes, there is Some Big Conspiracy. Both Forbes and the Wall Street Journal are State propaganda organs, using identical verbiage, techniques and tactics to blunt and defray awareness of the fact that the populace has recognized that pharmaceuticals have been weaponized against them. the article goes on to say “The number of parents questioning the safety of vaccines, the ingredients used, and the expanding 70-dose CDC schedule is growing, and medical organizations are trying to understand why”. The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “uncertain”. That’s why an evaluate.com article from June 2017 said “Total Worldwide Drug Sales Forecast To **_Fall_** As **_Uncertainty_** Hits”. They used “fall” because it’s general, and because it’s softer than decrease, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer.   They used “uncertainty” because it’s general, and a misdirection. Generally rising awareness leading to a growing public reluctance to buy deadly products is the driver of dropping drug sales, not “uncertainty”, as falsely alleged. “ **For the first time in a decade** consensus forecasts for worldwide drug sales have fallen **_short_** of the previous year's total. Prescription sales in 2022 are expected to hit $1.06trn, a drop from the $1.12trn predicted in 2016.” They’ve provide the numbers, but carefully hedged by omitting the far more impactful percentage decrease between them. The general “fallen short” is used in place of a specific statistic. That’s an example of a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”. So I had to do the math. It’s a 6% decrease. Evaluate is a State propaganda organ, doing what they can to blunt and defray awareness of the fact that the populace has recognized that pharmaceuticals have been weaponized against them. In June 2017, pharmaceuticalcommerce.com said “EvaluatePharma’s look ahead: 2022 global pharma sales will hit $1.06 trillion”. That’s a broad, boring, general statement. The propagandist knows that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines.  It’s a smoke-cloud to cover the collapsing pharmaceutical market.  “ **_Something_** of a sea change occurred between the annual forecast made by EvaluatePharma last year, and this year's: then, the company predicted 2017 global sales to be $822 billion; now, it projects $774 billion, up only 0.8% from the year before.” The propagandist at Pharmaceutical Commerce spun it as positively as they could, to gymnastically avoid saying “EvaluatePharma downgrades forecast by 9.4%”. And it’s a lie made up out of whole cloth - they picked the $774 billion number so that they wouldn’t have to predict a loss. Pharmaceutical Commerce is a State-sponsored propaganda outlet, doing their part within the larger news blackout that is in place on the subject of the collapsing pharmaceutical market. In July 2017, Bigtincan asked “ **_Can_** AI Improve Sales Productivity in Pharma **_?_** ” That’s some “don’t let the door hit you on the ass on the way out” shit, right there. They probably mean they want it to make up numbers that pretend the sales drop isn’t happening. In July 2017, thepharmaletter.com said “J&J jumps as earnings exceed forecasts, but pharma sales **_drop_** ”. They’ve done what they could to hedge by leading with the good news, and using the general “drop” to describe the decrease. The latter is an example of a propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”. The author knows that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines. You have to read the article to learn that “Pharma, J&J’s largest business, dipped by 0.2% to $8.6 billion compared to a year ago. This has partly been blamed on **_a positive adjustment of US rebate accruals_** in the second quarter of 2016, which did not repeat in the second quarter of 2017.” “A positive adjustment of US rebate accruals” is some fantastic Mil-speak. What does that even _mean_? It’s pure bullshit. It didn’t repeat in the second quarter because a gigantic whopper of a lie like that can’t be used serially. It’s a plausible-deniability excuse, put forward because the propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility. The Pharma Letter is a State-sponsored propaganda outlet, doing what they can to blunt and defray awareness of the fact that the populace has recognized that pharmaceuticals have been weaponized against them.In August 2017, Fortune said “Pharma Giant Teva's Stock Is **_Imploding_** As **_Generic Drugs Get Cheaper_** ”. Where “imploding”, while lurid, and accurate, is general. You can’t get any idea of the scope of the drop. It’s an example of the use of a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”. The propagandist knows that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines.  “Cheaper generic drugs” is a ruse, a half-truth, a plausible-deniability excuse, put forward because the propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility. The generics have gotten cheaper because of drastically dropping demand. The article goes on to say “That gamble failed to pay off as generic drugmakers began seeing their profit margins squeezed due to a **_drop_** in prices.” The only-generally described “drop” in prices is driven in part by increased competition. But the lion’s share of the drop is taking place because the populace has recognized that pharmaceuticals have been weaponized against it. The bottom has fallen out of the pharmaceutical market, and there’s an international news blackout in place on the subject. The article goes on to say “The stock slumped **_the most in almost two decades”_**. It’s another only-general descriptor, put forward to keep you from discerning the scope of the decrease. That’s an example of a propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”. Fortune is a Mouthpiece of the State, doing what they can to blunt and defray awareness of the fact that the populace has recognized that pharmaceuticals have been weaponized against them. In September 2017, medscape said “Antidepressants Tied to a **_Significantly_** Increased Risk **_for_** Death”. Where “SIGNIFICANTLY increased” is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here. Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.  “Increased risk FOR death” is a hedge, positive spin against the stronger “Increased risk OF death”. “Antidepressants TIED TO” puts antidepressants in the position of the victim, unwillingly carried along or associated with the only-generally-described increased risk FOR death. The article continues: “The investigators assessed the effects of antidepressants on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in general-population and cardiovascular-patient samples in a meta-analysis that included 17 relevant studies. In general-population samples, antidepressant use increased the risk for death from any cause by 33% (hazard ratio [HR], 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14 - 1.55) and the risk for new cardiovascular events by 14% (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.08 - 1.21).” We can now see that the headline used the general “SIGNFICANTLY increased” as a hedge against the specific “Antidepressants increased death by a third”. In October 2017, Bloomberg said “ **_Biosims_** Drive **_Down_** Roche Sales in Europe”. Where “competition from biosimilars” is a plausible-deniability excuse, put forward to keep you from grasping that the populace has recognized that pharmaceuticals have been weaponized against them. The author says that sales have been “driven down”, and that sales “dropped”, but the article contains no information as to the scope. That’s an example of a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”. Bloomberg is a Mouthpiece of the state, doing what it can to support the international news blackout that is in place on this subject. In October 2017, merck.com published an article headlined “Merck Announces Third-Quarter 2017 Financial Results”. Can you see how that headline is completely neutral? The propagandist knows that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines.  You have to read the article to learn that “Third-Quarter 2017 Worldwide Sales Were $10.3 Billion, a Decrease of 2 Percent”. Annualized, that would be an 8% drop, in just one year. That’s huge, a sea change, a going-out-of-business metric. The article goes on to say that “the pharmaceutical sales **_decline_** was largely driven by the **_loss of U.S. market exclusivity_** for ZETIA (ezetimibe) in late 2016 and VYTORIN (ezetimibe/simvastatin) in April 2017, medicines for lowering LDL cholesterol.” Where “loss of U.S. market exclusivity” is a ruse, a half-truth, a plausible-deniability excuse to keep your eyes off the larger trend I’m elucidating here. Oh, and by the way, it also shows that the public is rejecting the cholesterol lowering medications that make you die of heart disease more quickly than if you hadn’t taken them. People with high cholesterol levels live longer than people with low cholesterol levels. A Medscape article from August 2017 is headlined “ **_Doctors_** Say **_Info From Pharma Reps Is Stale_** ”.   The article goes on to say that “According to the survey, 64% of physicians said they'd met with pharmaceutical sales reps over the past 6 months. This **_seems_** to represent a **_significant_** drop in the percentage of doctors who meet with these reps, Dr Abramson said.” If you believe that the beautiful young women representing pharmaceutical firms are suddenly traveling around with outdated sales literature, there’s a bridge for sale here in Brooklyn that I think it would profit you to look at. The general “Doctors” described in the headline aren’t putting off the sales reps because of “stale product information”, as falsely alleged, but rather because the bottom has dropped out of the pharmaceutical market.  “Stale product information” is a plausible-deniability excuse, put forward because the propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility. The drop in doctors who meet with Pharma reps was only-generally described as “significant”. Medscape’s refusal to provide data on the trend is an example of a propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”. They’ve spun it the way they have to avoid saying “almost 40% of physicians have not met with a Pharma rep in the last six months.” “Medscape” is a State-sponsored propaganda outlet, trying their best to spin the news so that you don’t recognize the magnitude of the trend, or even that the trend exists, at all. In November 2017, Barron’s did what little they could to hedge by saying “ **_Why_** Teva Pharma **_Could_** Fall Another 50%”. Their explanation as to why that catastrophic, historically-unprecedented, going-out-of-business drop was taking place did not include “the populace has recognized that pharmaceuticals have been weaponized against them.” Sanofi’s 1st-qtr income dropped 10.7% in Q1 2018. Annualized, that would be a 40% decrease in revenue. That’s a gigantic change, a wholesale change, a sea change.  In 2020, Americans viewed drugmakers more negatively than more than 20 other industries polled, including oil, banking and the federal government, with pharma's net favorability rating reaching an all-time low in the survey's 19-year history. **Jeff Miller, Brooklyn, New York, January 13, 2020** If you'd like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at jeffreymiller64@hotmail.com You can access these articles online at [https://forum.orgones.co.uk/c/positive-changes-that-are-occurring/](https://forum.orgones.co.uk/c/positive-changes-that-are-occurring/)