"Increasing Water Quality and Clarity" from "Positive Changes That Are Occurring", by Jeff Miller

INCREASING WATER QUALITY AND CLARITY

Spies are, by nature and necessity, pathological liars who strive to make their endgames justify their meanness.”

― Stewart Stafford

Great positive changes are underway at every level of our reality. They began in earnest in 2012, and have been increasing in speed and magnitude. I began writing this series of articles, entitled “Positive Changes That Are Occurring”, in July of 2013.

These historically-unprecedented positive changes are being driven by many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices based on the work of Wilhelm Reich and Karl Hans Welz.

Since Don Croft first fabricated tactical Orgonite in 2000, its widespread, ongoing and ever-increasing distribution has been unknitting and transforming the ancient Death energy matrix built and expanded by our dark masters, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. And, as a result, the Ether is returning to its natural state of health and vitality.

One of those changes is that water clarity is increasing exponentially, regardless of geography.

The Orgonite-driven return to health of the Earth’s energetic or Etheric environment has as one of its byproducts increasing water clarity. Regular readers know that I’ve been documenting increasing water clarity in my articles for some time, now.

In March 2020, CNN said “Venice’s canal water looks clearer as coronavirus keeps visitors away”.

Here’s a picture from the article:
image

Numerous “the dog ate it!” ruses are currently in play posturing that the engineered virus recently released upon the populace is responsible for all manner of things, including the collapsing smart phone industry, and the collapsing electric car industry, to name only two of many others. As you can see from the headline up above from Venice, Italy, it’s also claimed to be responsible for increasing the water clarity, there.

Well, in this case, it’s not the virus, per se. It is being claimed that the recent virus-related lack of activity on Venice’s canals has caused sediment levels in them to drop, clarifying the water. That’s, well, plausible. And it is, in fact, a half-truth. And half-truths are the engine of propaganda.

The decrease in activity and related drop in churned-up sediment are real, but are merely incremental in impact, rather than quantum, as alleged. It’s a local plausible-deniability excuse, put forward to keep your eyes off the larger trend I’m elucidating here.

I thought it would be helpful if I reprised several of my pre-virus “increasing water clarity” articles below, to forestall the propaganda.

I pulled all of the pictures up into a bunch for you:

I would add that, while gondolas are moved with poles, rotation creates Death energy, and that the removal of X number of rotating propellers from the waters in an around Venice during this period of relative inactivity may be a factor in the improvement in the water quality. I mean, think about it - who is impacting the sedimentary bottom of the water system of Venice in any major way? There are gondolas, and their operators put poles down to the bottom and move their gondola’s forward. But they’d done so for many, many hundreds of years, and “gondola-related sediment” is simply not ringing true to me.

But a view of the pre-virus-inactivity water clarity photos below “settles” the matter, at least for me. Proves that a drop in tourist-traffic related sediment is not the primary driver of the improvement in water clarity there.

In February 2016, the Chicago Tribune published what is in the Intelligence trade referred to as a “hit piece”, headlined “Federal budget cuts could slow Lake Michigan restoration projects”.

Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it effectively “compartmentalizes” the message that is delivered by this photograph in the article below:

(Aerial view of Rosewood Beach, Highland Park, Michigan, 2016)

The caption of the photo reads: “An aerial view of Rosewood Beach in Highland Park, Michigan, which was restored through funds from the Great Lakes Restoration Inititative.”

Where the “restoration initiative” is real, and had actual funds, which were spent on actual activity - but it was merely incremental in impact, not quantum, as alleged. It’s a local plausible-deniability excuse, put forward to keep your eyes off the larger trend I’m elucidating here. What did they do, rake the beach? Send out divers to pick up cans and tires? I know that no gigantic water-filtration equipment was in place at the site, or we’d have been shown a picture of it. It’s mostly pure bullshit - what they refer to in the intelligence trade as a “limited hangout.”

There’s no mention of the fact that water clarity is improving regardless of geography, which is an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

In 2017, the Detroit News said Lake Huron and Lake Michigan saw an “increase” in water clarity.

In October 2017, in an amazing example of a Satanic Inversion, Pys.org said that clear lakes “disguise impaired water quality.” Assimilating it involves an example of what George Orwell called “Doublethink”.

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “amazed”.

That’s why an article from Iowa’s Storm Lake Pilot Tribune from June 2018 is headlined “DNR ‘amazed’ by lake’s water clarity improvement”.

Where “improvement” is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of statistics that would provide specific insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.

Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.

The article continues: “Things are looking good in the lake, thanks in part to a $50,000 donation from the Lake Preservation Association and regulation over recent years, said George Antoniou, coordinator for the Lake Restoration Program with the Iowa Department of Natural Resources.”

Where a lake that is looking great has been hedged back to looking merely “good”. And where the bullshit plausible-deniability excuses of “fifty grand” and the only-general “regulation” are put forward because the propagandist knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.

The article goes on to say “The Storm Lake hatchery has had an “absolutely stellar year,” Wallace said. It was second-best in the hatchery’s 32-year history with a harvest of nearly 500 quarts of eggs. “What this tells us is that the methods we’ve imposed on this lake of releasing fish 17 to 22 inches long is working, and that it takes time to see the effects of regulation and changes,” he said.

Can you see how he’s pretending that they managed to do it, themselves, and doesn’t mention record hatches taking place at other fish hatcheries in other geographies? That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

The article continues: “This year, 16 million fry were released into the lake, up from the usual 14, due to the surplus. Storm Lake is one of four lakes in the state that collects eggs.”

With a straight face, the propagandist has just said, to you face “the surplus in eggs is due to the surplus in eggs”. I’m sure you noticed that they provided the numbers, but carefully hedged by withholding the far more impactful percentage increase between them. That’s another example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”. So, I had to do the math. It’s a 14% increase, in one year.

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “amazed”. That’s why the article goes on to say “I have been amazed by the water clarity this year,” Wallace said. Antoniou echoed that sentiment, saying that water will continue to be monitored three times per year by Iowa State University to continue the good trends. He attributed the improvements in the lake to strong local leadership and support from the community.”

Where “strong local leadership” and “support from the community” are both only-general bullshit plausible-deniability excuses put forward because the propagandist knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.

Here’s George’s picture:
image

(George Antonio, Iowa DNR)

I’ve included his photograph so you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.

By the way, Storm Lake is a thinly-veiled reference to the storm god the folks in charge have worshipped under various guises all the way back to Babylon, and before.

In 2019, water quality in the Chesapeake Bay was the highest since record keeping began.

We get the name Satan from Set, also known as Seth and Suetekh, who was the Egyptian god of war, chaos and storms, brother of Osiris, Isis, and Horus the Elder, uncle to Horus the Younger, and brother-husband to Nephthys.

(The repugnant god Set, the repugnant Jar Jar Binks, and the repugnant god Set)

In August 2012, it was said that water clarity in Lake Tahoe “improved”, “despite extreme weather.” In March 2013, it was said that Lake Tahoe’s water quality was “improving”. In 2015, Phys.org said that water clarity levels in Lake Tahoe “improved” in 2014, “the biggest improvements in more than a decade.”

Well, if that’s true, why did a U.C. Davis report in May 2017 say that “Climate change” was “harming” Lake Tahoe’s clarity?

It’s not true. The University of California at Davis is a Trusted Authority Figure, using conscious deception with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.

Water quality in Lake Tahoe increased 17% from 2018 to 2019, to the highest level in history. It was the biggest one-year improvement since they began keeping records 50 years ago.

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “stunning”. That’s why a Mercury News article from May 2019 is headlined “Lake Tahoe shows stunning improvement in water clarity over past year”.

Where “stunning”, while lurid, is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of statistics that would provide specific insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.

Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.

(Lake Tahoe, 2019)

I had to read the article, and then do the math to learn that water quality in Lake Tahoe increased 17% from 2018 to 2019, to the highest level in history. It was the biggest one-year improvement since they began keeping records 50 years ago.

(Lake Tahoe, 2019)

In May 2019, a Minnesota Public Radio article said “Study: Improving water clarity in Mille Lacs means less habitat for walleye”.

The author attributed the only-generally-described “improving” water quality in the lake to “septic system improvements around the lake and the invasion of zebra mussels, which are filter feeders that strain out microscopic algae.”

Where the only-generally-described “septic system IMPROVEMENTS” and “the invasion of zebra mussels” are bullshit plausible-deniability excuses, put forward at the local level to keep your eye off the wider trend of increasing water clarity that I’m documenting here.

The author put “STUDY:” on the front end of the headline to give the subconscious of the reader the green light to say “oh, but that was just one study!” The propagandist knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.

Gretchen Hansen, an assistant professor at the University of Minnesota and the study’s lead author said “As the water has gotten clearer, more light can penetrate into the water,” she said. “And walleye, being low-light specialists, don’t really like that.”

In 1991, Zebra mussels invaded Saginaw Bay in Michigan. In May 2018, the Times Herald said “Anglers hook record numbers of walleye on Saginaw Bay”.

Where “RECORD numbers” is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of statistics that would provide specific insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here. Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.

You have to read the article to learn “Anglers took 123793 walleye, the most measured since creel surveys began on Saginaw Bay in 1983.”

Thus, Zebra-mussel-infested Saginaw Bay has the highest walleye numbers in history, refuting Ms. Hansen’s Middle-Ages, Punch-and-Judy thesis. I’ve exposed the duplicity of both the University of Minnesota and and Minnesota Public Radio using what was known in the old days as “fact-checking”.

Neither the study’s lead author or MPR mentioned that increasing water quality in Minnesota was part of a wider trend taking place regardless of geography. That’s an example of a propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

Here’s Gretchen’s picture:
image

(Gretchen Hansen, Assistant Professor, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Confirmation Biology, University of Minnesota)

I’ve included her photograph so you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.

Not all Fisheries professors are generational Satanists, of course. But all of those quoted in mainstream news publications certainly are.

You can’t recognize them by their appearance, beyond their almost-continuous use of supposedly “secret” hand signs.

image

You can only recognize them by the codified, highly-repetitive way in which they speak, and write.

They’re hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth, figuring the rubes would never notice.

You know them only-generally as “the One Percent”. They are the distinct and separate race that we know as “Neanderthal”. They’re all genetically related to one another. It’s a bloodline thing. As any middle schooler knows:

August 5, 2012 - 12 Year Old Girl Discovers All US Presidents Are Related to King John of England

They’re related through the maternal bloodline.

Here’s what you’re supposed to think a Neanderthal looks like:

capture.14-03-2021 13.37.54

While this is what a Neanderthal actually looks like:

image

(King John I of England, the guy all the US Presidents are related to through their maternal bloodlines)

Apr 17, 2001 — Research leader Dr Rosalind Harding said: ‘It is certainly possible that red hair comes from the Neanderthals.’

2020 - “ScotlandsDNA believes that everyone who carries one of 3 variants of the red-hair gene is a direct descendant of the first redhead ever to have it”

January 31, 2008 - Blue-eyed humans have a single, common ancestor

It’s how the few have controlled the many, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.

It’s why the ruling bloodlines of all the nations have the lightest skin.

We’re obviously going to have to recognize and come to terms with this if we’re going to make progress as a species. But they say that the hardest part of a problem is realizing that you have one.

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “significant”. That’s why a New Zealand Herald article from June 2019 is headlined “Study shows ‘significant’ improvement of lake water clarity around Rotorua.”

Where “significant” while accurate, is only-general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of statistics that would provide specific insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.

Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.

The author put “STUDY shows” on the front end of the headline to give the subconscious of the reader the green light to say “oh, but that was just one study!” The propagandist knows that many or most reader will grasp any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.

image

(Lake Rotorua, New Zealand, 2019)

The article continues: “A team led by senior scientist Dr Moritz Lehmann at Xerra Earth Observation Institute and the University of Waikato has published an analysis of trends in water clarity in 23 Rotorua lakes from 1999 to 2017. ‘We found that water clarity significantly improved in nine lakes over the 18-year study period,’ Lehmann said.

Where the Trusted Authority Figure parrots the same general hedge of “SIGNIFICANTLY” improved to blunt any insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here. The article contains no specific data as to what the improvements were, or when they occurred. As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda. They claim to be Scientists, but are deliberately keeping it completely general to keep your eye off the specific positive changes I’ve been documenting since they began in 2012/2013.

They’re also trying to spin it as if it’s been long, and slow and steady, over two decades, when in fact it has changed exponentially in just the last few years.

The article continues: “The researchers said some improvements could have resulted from lake management changes, such as alum dosing, water diversion and weed harvesting, but direct cause-and-effect relationships were not tested in this study.”

Where “alum dosing”, “water diversion” and “weed harvesting” are all general plausible-deniability excuses, put forward here at the local level to take your eye away from the wider trend of increasing water clarity that I’m documenting here. The propagandist knows that many or most reader will grasp any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.

The article concludes: “Lehmann said other research work was exploring the reasons behind this.”

Where “OTHER research WORK” is, once again, general. There’s no mention of increasing water clarity in New Zealand being part of a wider trend. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

In August 2019, the Texas Water Resources Institute said “East Texas watershed efforts to improve water quality seeing positive results”.

(East Texas, 2019)

East Texas, where, once again, an incremental, local campaign is claimed to have made the quantum change happen. No mention is made in the article of increasing water clarity in other locations, other geographies. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization.”

The article continues: “Anna Gitter, a Texas Water Resource Institute research associate, said the predominant water quality impairment in these other East Texas watersheds, as in the Attoyac Bayou, is bacteria.”

We’re back in Idiocracy once again, where bacteria decreases water clarity. Anna bravely advances the ludicrous plausible-deniability excuse because she knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.

But, remember, propaganda has a lifespan. And the positive changes the propaganda is rebutting aren’t stopping, but are, rather, increasing in speed and magnitude.

Here’s Anna’s picture:
image

(Anna Gitter, Associate, Texas Water Institute, wearing a natty Satanic-purple jacket)

I’ve included Ms. Gitter’s photograph so you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.

Not all water researchers are generational Satanists, of course. But those who get quoted in mainstream news publications certainly are.

In December 2019, voanews.com said “Mekong River’s new aquamarine color may be sign of trouble”.

That’s an example of what I’ve dubbed a Satanic Inversion, and which George Orwell called, variously, “Doublespeak” and “Doublethink”.

(Artificially-lowered but strikingly-blue Mekong river, Thailand, December 2019)

The article goes on to say “experts say the decline in sediment exposes a different danger that can result in greater erosion of the river’s banks and bed”. Which is another brazen Satanic Inversion. Rivers with high amounts of particulate matter in them eat away at river banks more assiduously than those with less. It’s like removing the abrasive from a polish. Can you see how “experts” is general?

The propagandist at VOA News has put forward this ridiculous plausible-deniability excuse because they know that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.

The author continues: “The experts and people living along the river blame a large hydroelectric dam upstream in Laos that began operating in October for contributing to both problems, though rainfall has also been sparse. Thailand’s rainfall increased 13% from 2019 to 2020, and was the second-highest total in history, second only to 1961.

The author bravely continues: “The dam blocks much sediment from moving further downstream, which accounts for the water becoming clear, said Pravit Kanthaduang, chief of the fishery office at Bueng Khong Long, a district in Thailand’s Bueng Kan province. Less sediment means less nutrition for plants and fish in the river, threatening the ecological balance, he said.”

Since we live in the Middle Ages, most readers have no trouble assimilating that fish eat river sediment.

image

There’s no mention in the article of the fact that water clarity is increasing regardless of geography, as documented in this article. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

Since we live in the Middle Ages, most readers have no trouble assimilating that fish eat river sediment.

Jeff Miller, Brooklyn, New York, March 5, 2021

If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]

You can access these articles online at https://forum.orgones.co.uk/c/positive-changes-that-are-occurring/