Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas,
atque metus omnis et inexorabile fatum
subiecit pedibus strepitumque Acherontis avari.
(“Blessed is he who has succeeded in learning the laws of nature’s working, has cast beneath his feet all fear and fate’s implacable decree, and the howl of insatiable Death”).
From “Georgica”, by Publius Vergilius Maro, also Vergil, 29 B.C.
This was a lot of work! A couple of weeks, coming out of a treasure trove of data on the Japanese bluefin tuna.
It will now be integrated into “The Etheric Origin of Species, And Low-Wavelength Microwave Radiation As a Driver of Their Extinction”.
From 1952 to 1953, the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 1.2%, or by 1,677 tons, from 134,751 tons to 136,428 tons. Both years were all-time records.
From 1952 to 1953, the spawning stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 5.4%, or by 5,561 tons, from 103,502 tons, the greatest in history, to 97,941 tons.
From 1952 to 1953, the 5.4% decrease in the spawning stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna was 550% greater, or six and a half times greater than the 1.2% increase in its total biomass.
Given that 1952 and 1953 were all-time records for total biomass for the Pacific bluefin tuna, and further given that the total biomass of the species increased by 1.2% from 1952 to 1953, to the greatest level in history, the 5.4% decrease in spawning stock biomass from 1952 to 1953 cannot be attributed to overfishing, but rather is clearly a sudden, exponential decrease in fertility.
This sudden, hyper-exponential decrease in the fertility of the Pacific bluefin tuna from 1952 to 1953 was driven by the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology.
From 1952 to 1953, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 8.5%, or by 1,450 tons, from 17,094 tons, the greatest in history, to 15,636 tons.
From 1952 to 1953, the 8.5% decrease in the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna was 57.4% greater, or almost two thirds greater than the 5.4% decrease in the spawning stock biomass of the species.
This statistic proves that, from 1952 to 1953, “overfishing” of the Pacific bluefin tuna did not take place, but, rather, the Japanese were practicing sound management of the population.
In 1952, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 17,094 tons, the greatest in history.
In 1952, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna of 17,094 tons represented 16.5% of the 103,502-ton spawning stock biomass of the species.
In 1952, per isc.fra.go.jp, the spawning stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 103,502 tons, the greatest in history.
In 1952, the 103,502-ton spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna represented 76.8% of the total biomass of the species of 134,751 tons.
In 1952, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 134,751 tons, the greatest in history.
From 1953 to 1954, the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 7.6%, or by 10,313 tons, from 136,428 tons to 146,741 tons. Both years were all-time records.
From 1953 to 1954, the 7.6% increase in the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna was 533.3% greater, or more than six times greater than its 1.2% increase from 1952 to 1953.
Here, from 1953 to 1954, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna is increasing hyper-exponentially.
From 1953 to 1954, the spawning stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 10.2%, from 97,941, the lowest in history, to 87,974, the lowest in history.
From 1953 to 1954, the 10.2% decrease in the spawning stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna was 88.8% greater, or almost two times greater than its 5.4% decrease from 1952 to 1953.
Here, from 1953 to 1954, the spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna is decreasing hyper-expontially, even as the total stock is increasing hyper-exponentially to the greatest in history.
From 1953 to 1954, spawning stock as a percentage of the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 17.8%, from 71.8% to 59%.
From 1953 to 1954, the 17.8% decrease in spawning stock as a percentage of the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna was 173.8% greater, or almost three times greater than its 6.5% decrease from 1952 to 1953. And this while total biomass was the greatest in history, while spawning stock was the lowest in history.
From 1953 to 1954, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 21.6%, or by more than one fifth, or by 3,391 tons, from 15,636 tons, the lowest in history, to 19,027 tons, the greatest in history.
From 1953 to 1954, the 21.6% increase in the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna was 311.7% greater, or more than four times greater than the 10.2% decrease in the spawning stock biomass of the species.
This is clear evidence of overfishing by the Japanese from 1953 to 1954.
In 1953, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 15,636 tons, the lowest in history.
In 1953, the all-time low total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna of 15,636 tons represented 15.9% of the all-time low 97,941-ton spawning stock biomass of the species.
In 1953, per isc.fra.go.jp, the spawning stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 97,941 tons, the lowest in history.
In 1953, the 97,941-ton spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna represented 71.8% of the total biomass of the species of 136,428.
In 1953, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 136,428 tons, the greatest in history.
In 1954, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 19,027 tons, the greatest in history.
In 1954, the all-time high total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna of tons 19,027 represented 21.6%, or more than one fifth of the all-time low 87,974-ton spawning stock biomass of the species.
In 1954, per isc.fra.go.jp, the spawning stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 87,974 tons, the lowest in history.
In 1954, the all-time-low 87,974-ton spawning stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna represented 59% of the all-time-high total biomass of the species of 146,741 tons.
From 1954 to 1955, the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 6.6%, or by 9,657 tons, from 146,741 tons to 156,398 tons. Both years were all time records.
From 1954 to 1955, the 6.6% increase in the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna was 13.1% less than its 7.6% increase from 1953 to 1954.
Here, from 1954 to 1955, even though the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna continues to increase, the rate of that increase is slowing, degraded by the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology.
In 1954, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 146,741 tons, the greatest in history.
From 1954 to 1955, the spawning stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 14.3%, or by 12,614 tons, from 87,974 tons, the lowest in history, to 75,360 tons, the lowest in history.
From 1954 to 1955, spawning stock as a percentage of the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 18.4%, or by almost one fifth, from 59% to 48.1%.
From 1954 to 1955, the 18.4% decrease in spawning stock as a percentage of the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna was 3.4% greater than its 17.8% decrease from 1953 to 1954.
From 1954 to 1955, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 35.2%, or by 6,702 tons, from 19,027 tons to 25,729 tons. Both years were all-time records.
From 1954 to 1955, the 35.2% increase in the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna was 346.2% greater, or almost four and a half times greater than the 14.3% decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the species.
This is clear evidence of overfishing by the Japanese from 1954 to 1955.
From 1954 to 1955, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna as a percentage of the total spawning stock biomass of the species increased by 45.3%, or by almost half, from 21.6% to 34.1%.
This is clear evidence of overfishing by the Japanese from 1954 to 1955.
In 1955, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 25,729 tons, the greatest in history.
In 1955, per isc.fra.go.jp, the spawning stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 75,360 tons, the lowest in history.
In 1955, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 156,398 tons, the greatest in history.
From 1955 to 1956, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 33.1%, or by one third, or by 8,539 tons, from 25,729 tons to 34,268 tons.
From 1955 to 1956, the 33.1% increase in the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna was 421.3% greater, or more than five times greater than the 10.3% decrease in the spawning stock biomass of the species.
This is clear evidence of overfishing by the Japanese from 1954 to 1955.
In 1956, per isc.fra.go.jp, the spawning stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 67,600 tons, the lowest in history.
In 1956, the all-time-low 67,600-ton spawning stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna represented 38.4% of the all-time-high total biomass of the species of 175,874 tons.
From 1955 to 1956, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 10.3%, or by 7,760 tons, from 75,360 tons, the lowest in history, to 67,600 tons, the lowest in history.
From 1955 to 1956, the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 12.5%, or by 19,476 tons, from 156,398 tons to 175,874 tons. Both years were all-time records.
From 1955 to 1956, the 12.5% increase in the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna was 89.4% greater, or almost two times greater than its 6.6% increase from 1954 to 1955.
Here, from 1955 to 1956, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna is increasing exponentially, despite documented overfishing by the Japanese from 1953 to 1956.
What caused it?
From 1955 to 1956, the 34.9% decrease in spawning stock as a percentage of the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna was 89.6% greater, or almost two times greater than its 18.4% decrease from 1954 to 1955.
From 1955 to 1956, the 89.6% positive variance in the decrease in spawning stock as a percentage of the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna versus 1954 to 1955 was 2,535.3% greater, or more than twenty six times greater than its 3.4% positive variance from 1954 to 1955 versus 1953 to 1954.
Given that 1953, 1954, 1955 and 1956 were all all-time records for the total stock of Pacific bluefin tuna, this hyper-exponential decrease in spawning stock as a percentage of the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna from 1955 to 1956 cannot be attributed to overfishing, but is, rather, clearly a sudden, exponential decrease in fertility.
This hyper-exponential decrease in the fertility of the Pacific bluefin tuna from 1955 to 1956 was driven by the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology.
From 1956 to 1957, spawning stock as a percentage of the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 3.4%, from 38.4% to 39.7%.
From 1956 to 1957, the 3.4% increase in spawning stock as a percentage of the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna was 109.7% greater, or more than two times greater than its 34.9% decrease from 1955 to 1956.
Here, from 1956 to 1957, we see both spawning stock biomass and total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increasing exponentially, driven by the inexorable improvement in the health of the ether on the way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012.
From 1956 to 1957, the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 10%, or by 17,723 tons, from 175,874 tons to 193,597 tons. Both years were all-time records.
From 1956 to 1957, the spawning stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 13.5%, or by 9,018 tons, from 67,700 tons, the lowest in history, to 76,817 tons.
From 1956 to 1957, the 13.5% increase in the spawning stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna was 35% greater, or more than one third greater than the 10% increase in its total biomass.
Here, from 1956 to 1957, we can clearly see that the fertility of the Pacific bluefin tuna is increasing exponentially, driven by the inexorable improvement in the health of the ether on the way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012.
From 1956 to 1957, the 13.5% increase in the spawning stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna was 138.6% greater, or more than two times greater than its 34.9% decrease from 1955 to 1956.
Here, from 1956 to 1957, after decreasing continuously from 1952 to 1956, the spawning stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna increased suddenly and exponentially, driven by the inexorable improvement in the health of the ether on the way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012.
From 1956 to 1957, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 20.3%, or by one fifth, or by 6,966 tons, from 34,268 tons, the greatest in history, to 27,302 tons.
And this while the spawning stock biomass of the species increased by 13.5%.
Here, from 1956 to 1957, we see the Japanese properly managing the Pacific bluefin tuna population.
In 1956, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 34,268 tons, the greatest in history.
In 1956, the all-time high total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna of 34,268 tons represented 50.7% of the all-time low total spawning stock biomass of the species of 67,600 tons.
In 1956, per isc.fra.go.jp, the spawning stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 67,700 tons, the lowest in history.
In 1956, the all-time-low 67,700-ton spawning stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna represented 38.4% of the all-time-high total biomass of the species of 175,874 tons.
In 1956, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 175,874 tons, the greatest in history.
From 1957 to 1958, the total spawning stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna by 31%, or by almost one third, or by 29,965 tons, from 76,817 tons to 100,683 tons.
From 1957 to 1958, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 53.7%, or by more than half, or by 12,636 tons, from 27,302 tons to 14,666 tons, the lowest in history. And this while the total spawning stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 31%, or by almost one third, or by 29,965 tons, from 76,817 tons to 100,683 tons.
Here, from 1957 to 1958, we have clear evidence of excellent management of the Pacific bluefin tuna population by the Japanese for the second year in a row.
In 1957, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 27,302 tons.
In 1957, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna of 27,302 tons represented 35.5% of the total spawning stock biomass of the species of 76,817 tons.
That’s down 29.1% from the 50.1% of the previous year.
Here, from 1957 to 1958, we have clear evidence of excellent management of the Pacific bluefin tuna population by the Japanese for the second year in a row.
In 1957, per isc.fra.go.jp, the spawning stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 76,817 tons.
In 1957, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 193,597 tons, the greatest in history.
From 1957 to 1958, the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 4.3%, or by 8,340 tons, from 193,597 tons to 201,937 tons. Both years were all-time records.
From 1957 to 1958, the 4.3% increase in the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna was 57% less, or almost two thirds less than its 10% increase from 1956 to 1957.
From 1957 to 1958, the 4.3% increase in the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna was 86.1% less than the 31% increase in its spawning biomass.
Here, from 1957 to 1958, the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology has caused the increase in the size and number of Pacific bluefin tuna to slow exponentially.
From 1957 to 1958, the spawning stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 31%, or by 23,866 tons, from 76,817 tons to 100,683 tons.
From 1957 to 1958, the 31% increase in the spawning stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna was 129.6% greater, or more than two times greater than its 13.5% increase from 1956 to 1957.
Here, from 1957 to 1958, the fertility of the Pacific bluefin tuna is increasing exponentially, driven by the inexorable improvement in the health of the ether on the way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012.
In 1958, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 14,666 tons, the lowest in history.
In 1958, per isc.fra.go.jp, the spawning stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 100,683 tons.
In 1958, the 100,683-ton spawning stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna represented 49.9% of the all-time-high total biomass of the species of 201,937 tons.
In 1958, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 201,937 tons, the greatest in history.
From 1958 to 1959, the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 3.6%, or by 7,363 tons, from 201,937 tons to 209,300 tons. Both years were all-time records.
From 1958 to 1959, the 3.6% increase in the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna was 16.3% less than its 4.3% increase from 1957 to 1958.
Here, from 1958 to 1959, despite documentedly-excellent management of the Pacific bluefin tuna population from 1956 through 1959, the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology has caused the increase in the size and number of Pacific bluefin tuna to slow exponentially.
From 1958 to 1959, spawning stock as a percentage of the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 30.5%, or by almost one third, from 49.9% to 65.1%.
In 1959, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 16,760 tons.
In 1959, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna of 16,760 tons represented 12.2% of the all-time high total spawning stock biomass of the species of 136,430 tons.
That’s the lowest in the data set, and it’s proof of excellent management of the Pacific bluefin tuna population by the Japanese in 1959.
In 1959, per isc.fra.go.jp, the spawning stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna was 136,430 tons, the greatest in history.
In 1959, the all-time high 136,430-ton spawning stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna represented 65.1% of the all-time-high total biomass of the species of 209,300 tons.
In 1959, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 209,300 tons, the greatest in history.
From 1959 to 1983, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 84.1%, or by 176,090 tons, from 209,300 tons, the greatest in history, to 33,210 tons, the lowest in history.
From 1959 to 1983, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by an annual average of 3.5%.
From 1959 to 1960, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 28.4%, or by 4,771 tons, from 16,760 tons to 21,531 tons.
From 1959 to 1960, the 38.7% decrease in spawning stock as a percentage of the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna was 36.2% greater, or more than one third greater than the 28.4% increase in the total Japanese catch.
This is clear evidence of something more than overfishing causing an exponential decrease in the spawning stock of the Pacific bluefin tuna.
That something is the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology.
From 1959 to 1960, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 5.8%, or by 7,981 tons, from an all-time high 136,430 tons to an all-time high 144,411 tons.
From 1959 to 1960, spawning stock as a percentage of the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 38.7%, or by more than one third, from 65.1% to 39.9%.
From 1959 to 1960, the 38.7% decrease in spawning stock as a percentage of the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna was 226.9% greater, or more than three times greater than its 30.5% increase from 1958 to 1959.
Here, from 1959 to 1960, despite documentedly-excellent management of the Pacific bluefin tuna population from 1956 through 1959, and all-time high spawning stock biomass numbers in 1959 and 1960, we see a sudden, hyper-exponential decrease in spawning stock as a percentage of the total biomass which cannot be explained by the ruse of “overfishing”.
The low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology has caused the fertility and growth rate of Pacific bluefin tuna to decrease exponentially, as its malefic effect becomes greater than the rate at which the underlying health of the ether is improving as a baseline.
In 1960, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 21,531 tons.
In 1960, per isc.fra.go.jp, the spawning stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 144,411 tons, the greatest in history.
In 1960, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 202,121 tons.
From 1960 to 1961, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 7.2%, or by 1,547 tons, from 21,531 tons to 23,078 tons.
From 1960 to 1961, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna by 8.2%, from 144,411 tons, or by 11,891 tons, the greatest in history, to 156,302 tons, the greatest in history.
From 1960 to 1961, the 7.2% increase in the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna was 12.2% less than the 8.2% increase in the total spawning stock biomass of the species.
Here, from 1960 to 1961, we have proof of excellent management of the Pacific bluefin tuna by the Japanese.
We now have proof of excellent management of the Pacific bluefin tuna population by the Japanese from 1956 through 1960.
From 1960 to 1961, spawning stock biomass as a percentage of the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 102.2%, or by more than two times, from 39.9% to 80.7%.
This is a sudden, hyper-exponential increase in spawning stock biomass which cannot be explained by conventional Biology.
Here, from 1960 to 1961, the fertility and growth rate of the Pacific bluefin tuna are increasing exponentially, driven by the inexorable improvement in the health of the ether on the way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012.
In 1961, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 23,078 tons.
In 1961, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna of 23,078 tons represented 14.8% of the all-time high total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna of 156,302 tons.
In 1961, per isc.fra.go.jp the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 156,302 tons, the greatest in history.
In 1961, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 156,302 tons, the greatest in history.
In 1961, the all-time high total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna of 156,302 tons represented 80.7% of the total biomass of the species of 193,546 tons.
In 1961, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 23,078 tons.
In 1961, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 193,546 tons.
From 1961 to 2010, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by an annual average of 1.9%.
From 1961 to 2010, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by an annual average of 3,189.8 tons.
From 1961 to 2010, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 93%, or by an almost infinite amount, or by 145,465 tons, from 156,302 tons, the greatest in history, to 10,837 tons, the lowest in history.
From 1961 to 2010, the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 62.9%, or by almost two thirds, or by 14,517 tons, from 23,078 tons to 8,561 tons, the lowest since 1993.
From 1961 to 2009, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by an annual average of 1.9%
From 1961 to 2009, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by an annual average of 3,018 tons.
From 1961 to 2009, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 92.7%, or by an almost infinite amount, or by 144,880 tons, from 156,302 tons, the greatest in history, to 11,422 tons, the second-lowest in history to 2010’s 10,837 tons.
From 1961 to 1962, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 4.2%, or by 971 tons, from 23,078 tons to 22,107 tons.
From 1961 to 1962, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna by 7.7%, or by 12,025 tons, from 156,302 tons, the greatest in history, to 144,277 tons.
From 1961 to 1962, the 7.7% decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 83.3% greater, or almost two times greater than the 4.2% decrease in the total Japanese catch.
Within the context of excellent Japanese management of the Pacific bluefin tuna population from 1956 through 1960, this is a sudden, hyper-exponential decrease in the the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna which cannot be explained by the ruse of “overfishing”.
The low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology has caused the fertility and growth rate of Pacific bluefin tuna to decrease exponentially, as its malefic effect becomes greater than the rate at which the underlying health of the ether is improving as a baseline.
In 1962, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 22,107 tons.
In 1962, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna of 22,107 tons represented 15.3% of the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna of 144,277 tons.
In 1962, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna of 144,277 tons.
In 1962, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 176,618 tons.
In 1962, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna of 144,277 tons represented 81.6% of the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna of 176,618 tons.
From 1962 to 1963, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 9.9%, or by tons, from 22,107 tons to 23,201 tons.
From 1962 to 1963, the percentage of the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna comprised by spawning stock decreased by 11.2%, from 81.6% to 72.5%.
From 1962 to 1963, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 16.7%, or by 24,033 tons, from 144,277 tons to 120,244 tons.
From 1962 to 1963, the 16.7% decrease in the spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 68.6% greater, or more than two thirds greater than the 9.9% decrease in the total Japanese catch.
After reaching an all-time high in 1961, what caused the spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna to suddenly decrease by almost one fifth from 1962 to 1963?
Patient readers will recall that, from 1960 to 1961, we have proof of excellent management of the Pacific bluefin tuna by the Japanese, and that, from 1960 to 1961, spawning stock biomass as a percentage of the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 102.2%, or by more than two times, from 39.9% to 80.7%. Thus, “overfishing” cannot be blamed.
Here, from 1960 to 1961, the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology has caused the fertility and growth rate of Pacific bluefin tuna to decrease exponentially, as its malefic effect surpassed the rate at which the underlying health of the ether is improving as a baseline.
From 1963 to 1964, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 16.4%, or by 3,795 tons, from 23,201 ton to 19,406 tons.
From 1963 to 1964, the 16.4% decrease in the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna was 37.9% greater, or more than one third greater than the 11.9% decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the species.
This is proof of excellent management of the Pacific bluefin tuna by the Japanese, and shows that something other than the general “overfishing” is driving the decrease in the spawning stock biomass of the species.
That something is the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which has caused the fertility and growth rate of Pacific bluefin tuna to decrease exponentially, as its malefic effect becomes greater than the rate at which the underlying health of the ether is improving as a baseline.
From 1963 to 1964, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 11.9%, or by 14,394 tons, from 120,244 tons to 105,850 tons.
In 1963, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 23,201 tons.
In 1963, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 120,244 tons.
In 1963, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna of 120,244 tons represented 72.5% of the total biomass of the species of 165,892 tons.
In 1963, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 165,892 tons.
From 1964 to 1965, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 4.5%, or by 874 tons, from 19,406 tons to 20,280 tons.
From 1964 to 1965, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 11.9%, or by 12,628 tons, from 105,850 tons to 93,222 tons.
What caused this sudden, exponential decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna, when the total Japanese catch increased by only 4.5%, or 874 tons?
This is proof that overfishing is not the cause of this sudden, exponential decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna from 1964 to 1965. Rather, the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology has caused the fertility and growth rate of Pacific bluefin tuna to decrease exponentially, as its malefic effect was far greater than the rate at which the underlying health of the ether was improving as a baseline.
From 1964 to 1965, the 11.9% decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was identical to its 11.9% decrease from 1963 to 1964.
The decrease in the spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was linear, mechanical, from 1963 to 1965.
In 1964, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 19,406 tons.
In 1964, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna of 19,406 tons represented 18.3% of the total spawning stock biomass of 105,850 tons.
In 1964, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 105,850 tons.
From 1965 to 1966, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 4.3%, or by 3,986 tons, from 93,222 tons to 89,236 tons.
How or why could the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decrease by 4.3% from 1965 to 1966 when the Japanese catch decreased by 24.8%, or by basically one fourth during the same time period?
Here we have hard proof that that overfishing is not the cause of this sudden, exponential decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna from 1965 to 1966. Rather, the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology has caused the fertility and growth rate of Pacific bluefin tuna to decrease exponentially, as its malefic effect was far greater than the rate at which the underlying health of the ether was improving as a baseline.
From 1965 to 1966, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 24.8%, or by 5,037 tons, from 20,280 tons to 15,243 tons.
From 1965 to 1966, the 24.8% decrease in the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna was 651.1% greater, or more than seven times greater than its 4.5% increase from 1964 to 1965.
The Japanese catch of bluefin tuna decreased hyper-exponentially from 1965 to 1966.
This is proof of excellent management of the Pacific bluefin tuna population by the Japanese, and refutes the “overfishing” meme which is tirelessly used to explain away the exponential decrease in the Pacific bluefin tuna population.
In 1965, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 20,280 tons.
In 1965, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 93,222 tons.
From 1965 to 1966, the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 16%, or by almost one fifth, or by 22,865 tons, from 142,548 tons to 119,683 tons.
How or why could the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 16%, or by almost one fifth from 1965 to 1966 when the Japanese catch decreased by 24.8%, or by basically one fourth during the same time period?
Here we have hard proof that that overfishing is not the cause of this sudden, exponential decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna from 1965 to 1966. Rather, the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology has caused the fertility and growth rate of Pacific bluefin tuna to decrease exponentially, as its malefic effect was far greater than the rate at which the underlying health of the ether was improving as a baseline.
In 1965, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 142,548 tons.
From 1966 to 1967, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 3.4%, or by 521 tons, from 15,243 tons to 14,722 tons.
In 1966, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 15,243 tons.
From 1966 to 1967, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 6.7%, or by 6,028 tons, from 89,236 tons to 83,208 tons.
How or why could the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 6.7%, or by 6,028 tons from 1966 to 1967, when the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 3.4%, or by 521 tons, during the same time period?
Here we have hard proof that that overfishing is not the cause of this sudden, exponential decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna from 1966 to 1967. Rather, the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology has caused the fertility and growth rate of Pacific bluefin tuna to decrease exponentially, as its malefic effect was far greater than the rate at which the underlying health of the ether was improving as a baseline.
In 1966, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 89,236 tons.
From 1966 to 1967, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 12.1%, or by 14,599 tons, from 119,683 tons, the lowest in history, to 105,084, the lowest in history.
How or why could the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 12.1%, or by 14,599 tons from 1966 to 1967, when the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 3.4%, or by 521 tons, during the same time period?
Here we have hard proof that that overfishing is not the cause of this sudden, exponential decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna from 1966 to 1967. Rather, the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology has caused the fertility and growth rate of Pacific bluefin tuna to decrease exponentially, as its malefic effect was far greater than the rate at which the underlying health of the ether was improving as a baseline.
In 1966, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 119,683 tons, the lowest in history.
In 1967, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 14,722 tons.
In 1967, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 83,208 tons.
In 1967, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 105,084, the lowest in history.
From 1967 to 1968, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 6%, or by 872 tons, from 14,722 tons to 15,601 tons.
From 1967 to 1968, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 6.9%, or by 5,742 tons, from 83,208 tons to 77,466 tons.5
From 1967 to1968, the 5,742-ton decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 558.5% greater, or more than six times greater than the 872-ton increase in the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna.
From 1967 to 1968, the 13,676-ton decrease in the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 1,468% greater, or more than fifteen times greater than the 872-ton increase in the the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna.
Here we have hard proof that that overfishing was not the cause of the sudden, exponential decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna from 1967 to 1968. Rather, the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology has caused the fertility and growth rate of Pacific bluefin tuna to decrease exponentially, as its malefic effect was far greater than the rate at which the underlying health of the ether was improving as a baseline.
From 1967 to 1968, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 13%, or by 13,676 tons, from 105,084, the lowest in history, 91,408 tons, the lowest in history.
From 1967 to 1968, the 13% decrease in the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 7.4% greater than its 12.1% decrease from 1966 to 1967.
The Pacific bluefin tuna is decreasing exponentially in size and number because the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology has caused the fertility and growth rate of Pacific bluefin tuna to decrease exponentially, as its malefic effect was far greater than the rate at which the underlying health of the ether was improving as a baseline.
In 1968, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 15,601 tons.
In 1968, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 77,466 tons.
In 1968, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 91,408 tons, the lowest in history.
From 1968 to 1969, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 39.4%, or by more than one third, or by 6,145 tons, from 15,601 tons to 9,456 tons, the lowest in history.
So much for the “Japanese are strip-mining the seas” canard.
canard - noun - an unfounded rumor or story.
From 1968 to 1969, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 11.9%, or by 10,885 tons, from 91,408 tons, the lowest in history, to 80,523 tons, the lowest in history.
From 1968 to 1969, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 17%, or by 13,167 tons, from 77,466 tons to 64,299 tons, the lowest in history
From 1968 to 1969, the 13,167-ton decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was statistically almost identical to its 13,676-ton decrease from 1967 to 1968.
And this while the Japanese catch increased by 6.8% from 1967 to 1968, and decreased by 39.4%, or by more than one third, or by 6,145 tons from 1968 to 1969.
Obviously, the mechanical, linear decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna is not connected to fishing. It is, rather, driven by the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which has caused the fertility and growth rate of Pacific bluefin tuna to decrease exponentially, as its malefic effect was far greater than the rate at which the underlying health of the ether was improving as a baseline.
From 1968 to 1969, the 17% decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 146.4% greater, or almost one and a half times greater than its 6.9% decrease from 1967 to 1968.
This 13,167-ton decrease occurred during the same time period during which the Japanese decreased their harvest by 6,145 tons, to the lowest in history.
As you can see, “overfishing” was not the cause of the hyper-exponential decrease in the spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna. It was, rather, because the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology has caused the fertility and growth rate of Pacific bluefin tuna to decrease exponentially, as its malefic effect was far greater than the rate at which the underlying health of the ether was improving as a baseline.
In 1969, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 64,299 tons, the lowest in history.
In 1969, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 9,456 tons, the lowest in history.
In 1969, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 80,523 tons, the lowest in history.
From 1969 to 1970, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 7.8%, or by 3,301 tons, from 80,523 tons, the lowest in history, to 74,222 tons, the lowest in history.
From 1969 to 1970, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 16%, or by almost one fifth, or by 10,388 tons, from 64,299 tons, the lowest in history, to 53,961 tons, the lowest in history.
And this while the total Japanese catch decreased by by 20.8%, or by one fifth, or by 1,968 tons, from 9,456 tons, the lowest in history, to 7,488 tons, the lowest in history.
Obviously, the ongoing, exponential decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was not connected to fishing. It was, rather, driven by the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which caused the fertility and growth rate of Pacific bluefin tuna to decrease exponentially, as its malefic effect was far greater than the rate at which the underlying health of the ether was improving as a baseline.
From 1969 to 1970, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 20.8%, or by one fifth, or by 1,968 tons, from 9,456 tons, the lowest in history, to 7,488 tons, the lowest in history.
In 1970, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 7,488 tons, the lowest in history.
In 1970, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 53,961 tons, the lowest in history.
In 1970, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 74,222 tons, the lowest in history.
From 1970 to 1971, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 16.5%, or by almost one fifth, or by 1,234 tons, from 7,488 tons, the lowest in history, to 8,722 tons.
From 1970 to 1971, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 13.1%, or by 7,122 tons, from 53,961 tons, the lowest in history, to 46,839 tons, the lowest in history.
From 1970 to 1971, the 7,122-ton decdrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 477.1% greater, or 5,888 tons greater than the 1,234-ton increase in the total Japanese catch.
Where did those extra 8,722 tons of tuna go, if they were not caught by the Japanese?
Obviously, the ongoing, exponential decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was not driven entirely, or even mostly by overfishing. It was, rather, driven by the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which caused the fertility and growth rate of Pacific bluefin tuna to decrease exponentially, as its malefic effect was far greater than the rate at which the underlying health of the ether was improving as a baseline.
From 1970 to 1971, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna by %, or by 8,078 tons, from 74,222 tons, the lowest in history, to 66,114 tons, the lowest in history.
In 1971, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 8,722 tons.
In 1971, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 46,839 tons, the lowest in history.
In 1971, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 66,114 tons, the lowest in history.
From 1971 to 1972, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 10.1% , or by 882 tons, from 8,722 tons to 7,840 tons.
From 1971 to 1972, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 13.6%, or by 6,362 tons, from 46,839 tons, the lowest in history, to 40,477 tons, the lowest in history.
Given that the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 882 tons from 1971 to 1972, this disappearance of 6,362 tons of Pacific bluefin funa must be attributed entirely to something other than overfishing.
Here, the ongoing, exponential decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was not in any way driven by overfishing. It was, rather, driven by the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which caused the fertility and growth rate of Pacific bluefin tuna to decrease exponentially, as its malefic effect was far greater than the rate at which the underlying health of the ether was improving as a baseline.
In 1972, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 7,840 tons.
In 1972, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 40,477 tons, the lowest in history.
In 1972, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 64,114, the lowest in history.
From 1972 to 1973, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 1.7%, or by 1,091 tons, from 64,114 tons, the lowest in history, to 63,023 tons, the lowest in history.
From 1972 to 1973, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 11.7%, or by 5,204 tons, from 40,477 tons, the lowest in history, to 35,273 tons, the lowest in history.
Given that the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by just 948 tons from 1971 to 1972, 82%, or 4,256 of these 5,204 tons of these Pacific bluefin tuna must necessarily have been eradicted by something other than fishing.
That something is the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which caused the fertility and growth rate of Pacific bluefin tuna to decrease exponentially, as its malefic effect was far greater than the rate at which the underlying health of the ether was improving as a baseline.
It is highly probable that the nearly-identical 12% increase in the Japanese catch was a ruse, to make the casual viewer think “oh, the spawning stock biomass decreased by 11.7%, which is nearly identical to the 12% increase in the Japanese catch.”
Yet a review of the tonnage tells the true tale.
From 1972 to 1973, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 12%, or by 948 tons, from 7,840 tons to 8,788 tons.
In 1973, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 8,788 tons.
In 1973, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 35,273 tons, the lowest in history.
In 1973, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 64,114 tons, the lowest in history.
From 1973 to 1974, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 70%, or by almost three fourths, or by 6,160 tons, from 8,788 tons to 14,948 tons.
From 1973 to 1974, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 1.2%, or by 7,412 tons, from 64,114 tons, the lowest in history, to 64,855 tons.
This is the first increase in the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna since 1964 to 1965. And it occurred even as the Japanese increased their total catch by 70%.
From 1973 to 1974, the 70% increase in the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna ws 483.3% greater, or almost six times greater than its 12% increase from 1972 to 1973.
From 1973 to 1974, the 6,160-ton increase in the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna was 549.7% greater, or basically six and a half times greater than its 948-ton increase from 1972 to 1973.
Here, after managing the Pacific bluefin tuna carefully and excellently from 1957 to 1972, the Japanese have gone off the rails from 1972 to 1974, making a great show of decimating the Pacific bluefin tuna. It’s a misdirection, sleight-of-hand to keep you from recognizing that the Pacific bluefin tuna is being driven out of existence by the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which caused the fertility and growth rate of Pacific bluefin tuna to decrease exponentially, as its malefic effect was far greater than the rate at which the underlying health of the ether was improving as a baseline.
From 1973 to 1974, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 19.4%, or by 6,771 tons, from 35,273 tons, the lowest in history, to 28,502 tons, the lowest in history.
In 1974, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 14,948 tons.
In 1974, the 6,771-ton decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 9.9% greater than the 6,160-ton increase in the total Japanese catch.
Here, despite the hand-waving ruse of the 70% increase in the total Japanese catch, we can see that the total spawning stock biomass is still decreasing at an even-greater rate.
In 1974, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 28,502 tons, the lowest in history.
In 1974, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 64,855 tons.
From 1974 to 1975, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 7.3%, or by 2,092 tons, from 28,502 tons, the lowest in history, to 26,410 tons, the lowest in history.
Given that, from 1974 to 1975 the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 24.6%, or by almost one fourth, or by 3,682 tons, from 14,948 tons to 11,266 tons, the disappearance of this 2,092 tons of Pacific bluefin tuna must have been caused by something other than fishing, specifically overfishing.
That something is the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which caused the fertility and growth rate of Pacific bluefin tuna to decrease exponentially, as its malefic effect was far greater than the rate at which the underlying health of the ether was improving as a baseline.
From 1974 to 1975, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 24.6%, or by almost one fourth, or by 3,682 tons, from 14,948 tons to 11,266 tons.
From 1974 to 1975, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 1.7%, or by 1,119 tons, from 64,855 tons to 65,974 tons.
This is the second consecutive year of an increase in the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna.
From 1974 to 1975, the 1.7% increase in the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 41.6% greater, or almost half again greater than its 1.2% increase from 1973 to 1974.
Here, from 1974 to 1975, the number and size of the Pacific bluefin tuna are both increasing exponentially, as the health of the ether continues to inexorably improve on its way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012, at a rate that well exceeds the ability of microwave radiation to degrade it.
In 1975, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 11,266 tons.
In 1975, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 26,410 tons, the lowest in history.
In 1975, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 65,074 tons.
From 1975 to 1976, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by .86%, or by 562 tons, from 65,074 tons to 64,512 tons.
And this even as the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 22.8%, or by more than one fifth, or by 2,569 tons, from 11,266 tons to 8,697 tons.
Here, the entirety of this sudden disappearance of 562 tons of Pacific bluefin tuna must be the result of some force or influence other than fishing, specifically overfishing.
That force or influence is the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which caused the fertility and growth rate of Pacific bluefin tuna to decrease exponentially, as its malefic effect was far greater than the rate at which the underlying health of the ether was improving as a baseline.
From 1975 to 1976, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 22.8%, or by more than one fifth, or by 2,569 tons, from 11,266 tons to 8,697 tons.
From 1975 to 1976, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 10.8%, or by 2,864 tons, from 26,410 tons, the lowest in history, to 29,274 tons.
From 1975 to 1976, the 2,569-ton decrease in the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna and the 2,864-ton increase in its spawning stock biomass were statistically very similar.
Here, the increase in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna can be inferred to have been caused by the decrease in the total Japanese catch, which refutes the thesis that overfishing by the Japanese is decimating the population of the Pacific bluefin tuna.
In 1976, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 8,697 tons.
In 1976, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 29,274 tons.
In 1976, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 64,512 tons.
From 1976 to 1977, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 15.7%, or by 10,158 tons, from 64,512 tons to 74,670 tons.
From 1976 to 1977, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna by 19.9%, or by basically one fifth, or by 5,831 tons, from 29,274 tons to 35,105 tons.
From 1976 to 1977, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 51.8%, or by more than half, or by 4,505 tons, from 8,697 tons to 13,202 tons.
Here, from 1976 to 1977, the Japanese increased their catch by an additional 4,505 tons, or by more than half, yet the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 15.7%, or by 10,158 tons, from 64,512 tons to 74,670 tons, and the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna by 19.9%, or by basically one fifth, or by 5,831 tons, from 29,274 tons to 35,105 tons.
Both of these statistics wholly refute the ruse that overfishing is the driver of the hyper-exponential decreases in the size and number of the Pacific bluefin tuna.
In 1977, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 13,202 tons.
In 1977, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 35,105 tons.
In 1977, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 74,670 tons.
From 1977 to 1978, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 2.6%, or by 1,931 tons, from 74,670 tons to 76,601 tons.
From 1977 to 1978, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 8.2%, or by 2,886 tons, from 35,105 tons to 32,219 tons.
From 1977 to 1978, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna by 63.4%, or by almost two thirds, by 8,375 tons, from 13,202 tons to 21,577 tons.
Here, from 1977 to 1977, the total Japanese catch increased by 8,375 tons, but the total spawning stock decreased by just 2,886 tons. An increase in catch of nearly two thirds resulted in a decrease in spawning stock biomass of just 8.2%. And the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 2.6%, or by 1,931 tons, from 74,670 tons to 76,601 tons.
This cannot be called terrible fishery management, or even poor fishery management.
In 1978, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 21,577 tons.
In 1978, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 32,219 tons.
In 1978, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 76,601 tons.
From 1978 to 1979, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 18.4%, or by almost one fifth, or by 3,960 tons, from 21,577 tons to 25,537 tons.
From 1978 to 1979, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 15.9%, or by 5,126 tons, from 32,219 tons to 27,093 tons.
From 1978 to 1979, the 15.9% decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 13.6% less than the 18.4% increase in the tota Japanese catch.
From 1978 to 1979, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 3.9% ,or by 2,986 tons, from to 76,601 tons to 73,615 tons.
In 1979, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 25,537 tons.
In 1979, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 27,093 tons.
In 1979, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 73,615 tons.
From 1979 to 1980, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 1%, or by 806 tons, from 73,615 tons to 72,809 tons.
How or why could or would the the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decrease by 1%, or by 806 tons, when the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 23.3%, or by almost one fourth, or by 5,963 tons, from 25,537 tons to 19,574 tons?
Here, “overfishing” is obviously not the driver. The driver is the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which caused the fertility and growth rate of Pacific bluefin tuna to decrease exponentially, as its malefic effect was far greater than the rate at which the underlying health of the ether was improving as a baseline.
From 1979 to 1980, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 23.3%, or by almost one fourth, or by 5,963 tons, from 25,537 tons to 19,574 tons.
From 1979 to 1980, the 23.3% decrease in the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna was 145.2% greater, or almost one and a half times greater than the 9.5% increase in the total spawning stock biomass of the species.
This documents excellent tuna husbandry by the Japanese, and also begs the question as to why a decrease in catch of almost one fourth would only bring about a 9.5% increase in spawning stock.
Front 1979 to 1980, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 9.5%, or by 2,564 tons, from 27,093 tons to 29,657 tons.
In 1980, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 19,574 tons.
In 1980, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 29,657 tons.
In 1980, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 72,809 tons.
From 1980 to 1981, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 70.4%, or by almost three fourths, or by 13,779 tons, from 19,574 tons to 33,353 tons.
From 1980 to 1981, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 5.8%, or by 1,729 tons, from 29,657 tons to 27,928 tons.
If the Japanese increased their total catch from 1980 to 1981 by 13,779 tons, then how or why could the total spawning stock biomass have decreased by just 1,729 tons?
From 1980 to 1981, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 21.5%, or by more than one fifth, or by 15,327 tons, from 72,809 tons to 57,482 tons, the lowest in history.
From 1980 to 1981, the 15,327-ton decrease in the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 11.3% greater, or 1,557 tons greater than the 13,770-ton increase in the total Japanese catch.
This betrays the fact that the ludicrous 70.4% increase in the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna was a hand-waving public relations stunt, executed to draw attention away from the fact that the species was being driven out of existence by the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology.
From 1980 to 1981, the 21.5% decrease in the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 2,050% greater, or more than twenty times greater than its 1% decrease from 1979 to 1980.
In 1981, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 33,353 tons.
In 1981, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 27,928 tons.
In 1981, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 57,482 tons, the lowest in history.
From 1981 to 1982, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 6.9%, or by 1,940 tons, from 27,928 tons to 25,988 tons.
From 1981 to 1982, the 6.9% decrease in the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna was far, far less than its 70.4% increase from 1981 to 1982.
I don’t know how to do the statistics.
But I do know that the Japanese laid way off the tuna harvesting, and the total stock biomass and the total spawning stock biomass both continued to decrease exponentially to the lowest levels in history.
This proves that overfishing did not drive the exponential decrease in the Pacific bluefin tuna population, but, rather, that the species was being driven out of existence by the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology.
From 1981 to 1982, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 29.7%, or by almost one third, or by 17,084 tons, from 57,482 tons, the lowest in history, to 40,398 tons, the lowest in history.
And this even as the total Japanese catch decreased by 6.9%, or by 1,940 tons.
These statistics show that something other than overfishing is causing the size and number of Pacific bluefin tuna to decrease exponentially.
That something was the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology.
In 1982, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 25,988 tons.
In 1982, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 24,240 tons, the lowest in history.
In 1982, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna of 25,988 tons was 7.2% greater than the total spawning stock biomass of the species of 24,240 tons.
Here, after decades of excellent management of the Pacific bluefin tuna, the Japanese have, in one year, vacuumed out the population in one pull, and decreased it to the lowest level in history.
For those unaware, the Japanese generally do not do irrational, illogical things as individuals, let alone in a large group.
I suggest that it is a fantastic, hand-waving puliblicity stunt executed to give the false impression that “overfishing” has caused the decades-long, exponential decrease in the size and number of the Pacific bluefin tuna, versus the truth, which is that the species was being driven out of existence by the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology.
In 1982, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 40,398 tons, the lowest in history.
from 1982 to 1984, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased exponentially to the lowest level in history.
From 1982 to 1983, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 17.8%, or by almost one fifth, or by 7,100 tons, from 40,398 tons, the lowest in history, to 33,210 tons, the lowest in history.
From 1982 to 1983, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 19.6%, or by basically one fifth, or by 4,769 tons, from 24,240 tons to 19,471 tons.
From 1982 to 1983, the 17.8% decrease in the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 408.5% greater, or more than five times greater than its 3.5% average annual decrease from 1959 to 1983.
And this during the same time period in which the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 19.6%, or by basically one fifth, or by 4,769 tons, from 24,240 tons to 19,471 tons.
This proves that the general “overfishing” was not the driver 19.6% decrease in the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna from 1982 to 1983.
It is an example of the propaganda technique known as “the big lie”.
The truth is that the species was being driven out of existence by the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology.
From 1982 to 1983, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 40.4%, or by almost half, or by 9,784 tons, from 24,240 tons, the lowest in history, to 14,456 tons, the lowest in history.
And this while the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 19.6%, or by basically one fifth, or by 4,769 tons, from 24,240 tons to 19,471 tons.
This proves that overfishing was not the driver of the 40.4% decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna from 1982 to 1983.
The truth is that the species was being driven out of existence by the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology.
In 1983, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 14,456 tons, the lowest in history.
In 1983, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 19,471 tons.
In 1983, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 33,210 tons, the lowest in history.
From 1983 to 1984, the rate of the exponential decrease in the size and number of the Pacific bluefin tuna slowed exponentially.
From 1983 to 1984, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 12.5%, or by 1,805 tons, from 12,651 tons, the lowest in history, to 14,456 tons, the lowest in history.
This while the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 48.5%, or by almost half, or by 9,580 tons, from 19,741 tons to 10,161 tons, the lowest in history.
This proves that the entirety of the disappearance of 1,805 tons of the spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna must be attributed to some cause other than the general “overfishing”.
The driver of that disappearance is the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which caused the fertility and growth rate of Pacific bluefin tuna to decrease exponentially, as its malefic effect was far greater than the rate at which the underlying health of the ether was improving as a baseline.
From 1983 to 1984, the 12.5% decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 69% less, or more than two thirds less than its 40.4% decrease from 1982 to 1983.
The rate of the exponential decrease in the size and number of the Pacific bluefin tuna has slowed exponentially.
From 1983 to 1984, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 12.8%, or by 5,254 tons, from 33,210 tons, the lowest in history, to 37,464 tons.
Even as the total spawning stock decreased by an almost-identical 12.5%. And this during a time period when the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 48.5%, or by almost half, or by 9,580 tons, from 19,741 tons to 10,161 tons, the lowest in history.
This proves that overfishing has nothing to do with the fact that the spawning stock biomass is decreasing, even as the total biomass of the species is increasing, for the first time in decades.
That anomalous, double-digit decrease in the spawning stock biomass can be attributed to nothing other than the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which caused the fertility and growth rate of Pacific bluefin tuna to decrease exponentially, as its malefic effect was far greater than the rate at which the underlying health of the ether was improving as a baseline.
From 1983 to 1984, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna by decreased by 48.5%, or by almost half, or by 9,580 tons, from 19,741 tons to 10,161 tons, the lowest in history.
From 1983 to 1984, the 48.5% decrease in the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna was 147.4% greater, or almost one and a half times greater than its 19.6% decrease from 1982 to 1983.
This statistic shows that, from 1982 to 1984, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased exponentially.
In 1984, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 10,161 tons, the lowest in history.
In 1984, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 12,651 tons, the lowest in history.
In 1984, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 37,464 tons.
From 1984 to 1985, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 5.7%, or 2,172 tons, from 37,464 tons to 39,591 tons.
From 1984 to 1985, the 5.7% increase in the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 55.5% less, or more than half again less than its 12.8% increase from 1983 to 1984.
From 1984 to 1985, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 1.3%, or by 164 tons, from 12,651 tons, the lowest in history, to 12,815 tons.
This is a rare increase in the total spawning stock biomass (research).
From 1984 to 1985, the 1.3% increase in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 110.4% greater(? far, far greater than its 12.5% decrease from 1983 to 1984.
And this while the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 14.8%, or by 1,512 tons, from 10,161 tons, the lowest in history, to 11,673 tons.
That’s some great fisheries management, and it also shows that the underlying health of the ether has begun to improve in earnest on its way up to and throught the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012.
From 1984 to 1985, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 14.8%, or by 1,512 tons, from 10,161 tons, the lowest in history, to 11,673 tons.
In 1985, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 11,673 tons.
In 1985, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 12,815 tons
In 1985, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 39,591 tons.
From 1985 to 1986, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 14.9%, or by 1,744 tons, from 11,673 tons to 13,417 tons.
From 1985 to 1986, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna by 18.2%, or by 2,332 tons, from 12,815 tons to 15,147 tons.
And this even as the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 14.9%, or by 1,744 tons, from 11,673 tons to 13,417 tons.
This is sound fisheries management, and also shows that the underlying health of the ether improved significantly from 1985 to 1986.
From 1985 to 1986, the 18.2% increase in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 1,300% greater, or fourteen times greater than its 1.3% increase from 1984 to 1985.
Here, from 1985 to 1986, the spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna has increased suddenly and hyper-exponentially, even despite a 15% increase in the total Japanese catch.
From 1985 to 1986, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 13.2%, or by 5,242 tons, from 39,591 tons to 34,349 tons, the lowest in history.
And this coming off an increase of 5.7%, or 2,172 tons from 1984 to 1985.
In 1986, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 13,417 tons.
In 1986, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 15,147 tons.
In 1986, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 34,349 tons.
From 1986 to 1987, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 4%, or by 568 tons, from 13,417 tons to 13,985 tons.
From 1986 to 1987, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 7.8%, or by 1,189 tons, from 15,147 tons to 13,958 tons.
From 1986 to 1987, the 1,189-ton decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 109.3% greater, or more than two times greater than the 568-ton increase in the total Japanese catch.
Here, the disappearance of 621 tons of Pacific bluefin tuna from 1986 to 1987 can only be attributed to some force or factor other than the general “overfishing”. And that force is more than two times greater than the pressure of increased fishing.
That force is the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which caused the fertility and growth rate of Pacific bluefin tuna to decrease exponentially, as its malefic effect was far greater than the rate at which the underlying health of the ether was improving as a baseline.
From 1986 to 1987, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 6.8%, or by 2,321 tons, from 34,349 tons to 32,008 tons.
From 1986 to 1987, the 6.8% decrease in the the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 48.8% less, or almost half again less than its 13.3% decrease from 1985 to 1986.
In 1987, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 13,958 tons.
In 1987, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 13,958 tons.
In 1987, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 32,008 tons, the lowest in history.
From 1987 to 1988, the the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 48.7%, or by almost half, or by 6,822 tons, from 13,958 tons to 7,163 tons, the lowest in history.
From 1987 to 1988, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 7%, or by 973 tons, from 13,958 tons to 14,931 tons.
From 1987 to 1988, the 973-ton increase in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 48.7% less, or 5,849 tons less than the 6,822-ton decrease in the total Japanese catch.
There is obviously a downward pressure on the spawning stock of the Pacific bluefin tuna which is unconnected with fishing.
From 1988 to 1989, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 9.9%, or by 3,763 tons, from 38,086 tons to 41,849 tons.
From 1988 to 1989, the 3,763-ton increase in the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 92.5% greater, or almost two times greater than the 1,955-ton increase in the total Japanese catch.
And this within the context of a 48.7% decrease in the Japanese catch from 1987 to 1988, followed by an exponentially-greater 27.3% decrease in the total catch from 1988 to 1999.
And so, thus, an exponential increase in the Japanese catch was accompanied by an even-exponentially-greater increase in the total stock biomass of the species.
Obviously, the population and average weight of the Pacific bluefin tuna are both increasing exponentially, and the only-general “overfishing” has nothing to do with anything.
It is an example of the propaganda technique known as “the big lie”.
The truth is that here, from 1988 to 1989, the population and average weight of the Pacific bluefin tuna are both increasing exponentially, as the health of the ether continues to inexorably improve on its way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012, at a rate that well exceeds the ability of microwave radiation to degrade it.
In 1989, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 9,118 tons.
In 1989, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 14,839 tons.
In 1989, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 41,849 tons.
From 1989 to 1990, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 27.3%, or by almost one third, or by 1,955 tons from 7,163 tons, the lowest in history, to 9,118 tons.
And this while the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna by increased by a nearly-identical 27.3%.
Obviously, the population and average weight of the Pacific bluefin tuna are both increasing exponentially.
From 1989 to 1990, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 27.7%, or by 4,114 tons, from 14,839 tons to 18,953 tons.
From 1989 to 1990, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 38.8%, or by 16,273 tons, from 41,849 tons to 58,122 tons.
From 1989 to 1990, the 38.8% increase in the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 291.9% greater, or almost three times greater than its 9.9% increase from 1988 to 1989.
Here, from 1989 to 1990, the population and average weight of the Pacific bluefin tuna are both increasing exponentially, as the health of the ether continues to inexorably improve on its way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012, at a rate that well exceeds the ability of microwave radiation to degrade it.
In 1990, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 6,282 tons, the lowest in history.
In 1990, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 18,953 tons.
In 1990, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 58,122 tons.
From 1990 to 1991, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 12.4%, or by 7,299 tons, from 58,122 tons to 65,351 tons.
And this even as the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 131.4%, or by more than two times, or by 8,253 tons, from 6,282 tons, the lowest in history, to 14,535 tons.
This proves that the general “overfishing” the only-general “overfishing” has nothing to do with anything.
It is an example of the propaganda technique known as “the big lie”.
The truth is that, here, from 1990 to 1991, the population and average weight of the Pacific bluefin tuna are both increasing exponentially, as the health of the ether continues to inexorably improve on its way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012, at a rate that well exceeds the ability of microwave radiation to degrade it.
From 1990 to 1991, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 33.4%, or by one third, by 6,341 tons, from 18,953 tons to 25,294 tons.
From 1990 to 1991, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 131.4%, or by more than two times, or by 8,253 tons, from 6,282 tons, the lowest in history, to 14,535 tons.
And yet, during the same time period, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna by increased 33.4%, or by one third, by 6,341 tons, from 18,953 tons to 25,294 tons.
This proves that the general “overfishing” the only-general “overfishing” has nothing to do with anything.
It is an example of the propaganda technique known as “the big lie”.
The truth is that, here, from 1990 to 1991, the population and average weight of the Pacific bluefin tuna are both increasing exponentially, as the health of the ether continues to inexorably improve on its way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012, at a rate that well exceeds the ability of microwave radiation to degrade it.
From 1991 to 1992, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 76.1%, or by more than three fourths, or by 4,781 tons, from 6,282 tons, the lowest in history, to 11,063 tons.
In 1991, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 14,536 tons.
In 1991, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 25,294 tons.
In 1991, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 65,351 tons.
From 1991 to 1992, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 23.8%, or by almost one fourth, or by 3,473 tons, from 14,536 tons to 11,063 tons.
From 1991 to 1992, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 27.5% or by almost one third, or by 6,958 tons, from 25,294 tons to 32,252 tons.
From 1991 to 1992, the increase in the the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna of 6,958 tons was 100.3% greater, or two times greater than the increase in the total Japanese catch of 3,473 tons.
Here, from 1991 to 1992, the population and average weight of the Pacific bluefin tuna are both increasing exponentially, as the health of the ether continues to inexorably improve on its way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012, at a rate that well exceeds the ability of microwave radiation to degrade it.
From 1991 to 1992, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 16.6%, or by 10,877 tons, from 65,351 tons to 76,228 tons.
From 1991 to 1992, the 16.6% increase in the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 33.8% greater, or one third greater than its 12.4% increase from 1990 to 1992.
And this even as the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 76.1%, or by more than three fourths, or by 4,781 tons, from 6,282 tons, the lowest in history, to 11,063 tons.
And so, thus, an exponential increase in the Japanese catch was accompanied by an even-exponentially-greater increase in the total stock biomass of the species.
Obviously, the population and average weight of the Pacific bluefin tuna are both increasing exponentially, and the only-general “overfishing” has nothing to do with anything.
It is an example of the propaganda technique known as “the big lie”.
The truth is that here, from 1991 to 1992, the population and average weight of the Pacific bluefin tuna are both increasing exponentially, as the health of the ether continues to inexorably improve on its way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012, at a rate that well exceeds the ability of microwave radiation to degrade it.
In 1992, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 11,063 tons.
In 1992, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 32,252 tons.
In 1992, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 76,228 tons.
From 1992 to 1993, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 9.7%, or by 7,396 tons, from 76,228 tons to 83,624 tons.
And this while the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 15.8%, or by 1,753 tons, from 11,063 tons to 9,310 tons.
That leaves 5,643 new, additional tons of Pacific bluefin tuna biomass. Where did it come from?
Here, from 1992 to 1993, the size and number of Pacific bluefin tuna are increasing exponentially because the health of the ether is inexorably improving on the way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012, and the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism all vary directly with the health of the ether.
From 1992 to 1993, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 15.8%, or by 1,753 tons, from 11,063 tons to 9,310 tons.
From 1992 to 1993, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 26%, or by 11,387 tons, from 32,252 to 43,639 tons.
And this while the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 15.8%, or by 1,753 tons, from 11,063 tons to 9,310 tons.
That leaves 9,634 new, additional tons of spawning stock biomass. Where did it come from?
Here, from 1992 to 1993, the size and number of Pacific bluefin tuna are increasing exponentially because the health of the ether is inexorably improving on the way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012, and the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism all vary directly with the health of the ether.
In 1993, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 9,310 tons.
In 1993, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 43,639 tons, the greatest since 1971.
In 1993, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 83,624 tons, the greatest since 1968.
From 1993 to 1994, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 63.1%, or by almost two thirds, or by 5,876 tons, from 9,310 tons to 15,186 tons.
From 1993 to 1994, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 15.2%, or by 6,638 tons, from 43,639 tons, the greatest since 1971, to 50,277 tons, the greatest since 1970.
And this even as the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 63.1%, or by almost two thirds, or by 5,876 tons, from 9,310 tons to 15,186 tons.
Here, from 1993 to 1994, the size and number of Pacific bluefin tuna are increasing exponentially because the health of the ether is inexorably improving on the way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012, and the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism all vary directly with the health of the ether.
From 1993 to 1994, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna by 16.8%, or by 14,107 tons, from 83,624 tons, the greatest since 1968, to 97,731 tons, the greatest since 1967
From 1993 to 1994, the 16.8% increase in the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 73.2% greater, or almost three fourths greater than its 9.7% increase from 1992 to 1993.
And this even as the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 63.1%, or by almost two thirds, or by 5,876 tons, from 9,310 tons to 15,186 tons.
Here, from 1993 to 1994, the size and number of Pacific bluefin tuna are increasing exponentially because the health of the ether is inexorably improving on the way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012, and the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism all vary directly with the health of the ether.
In 1994, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 15,186 tons.
In 1994, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 50,277 tons, the greatest since 1970.
In 1994, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 97,731 tons, the greatest since 1967.
From 1994 to 1995, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna by 24.8%, or by basically one fourth, or by 12,507 tons, from 50,277 tons to 62,784 tons.
From 1994 to 1995, the 24.8% increase in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 63.1% greater, or almost two thirds greater than its 15.2% increase from 1993 to 1994.
From 1994 to 1995, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 3.5%, or by 3,452 tons, from 97,731 tons to 94,279 tons.
From 1994 to 1995, the 3.5% decrease in the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 120.8% less than its 16.8% increase from 1993 to 1994.
In 1995, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 62,784 tons.
In 1995, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) ws 94,279 tons.
From 1995 to 1996, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 1.5%, or by 958 tons, from 62,784 tons to 61,826 tons.
From 1995 to 1996, the 1.5% decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 106% less than its 24.8% increase from 1994 to 1995.
From 1995 to 1996, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 2.3%, or by 2,184 tons, from 94,279 tons to 96,463 tons.
From 1995 to 1996, the 2.3% increase in the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 165.7% greater, or more than one and a half times greater than its 3.5% decrease from 1994 to 1995.
In 1996, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 61,826 tons.
In 1996, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 96,463 tons.
From 1996 to 1997, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 7.8%, or by 6,114 tons, from 96,463 tons to 90,349 tons.
From 1996 to 1997, the 7.8% decrease in the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 431.9% less, or more than five times less than its 2.3% increase from 1995 to 1996.
From 1996 to 1997, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 8.8%, or by 5,433 tons, from 61,826 tons to 56,393 tons.
From 1996 to 1997, the 8.8% decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 686.6% less, or almost eight times less than its 1.5% increase from 1995 to 1996.
In 1997, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 24,482 tons.
In 1997, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 56,393 tons.
In 1997, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 90,349 tons.
From 1997 to 2010, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 65%, or by almost two thirds, or by 15,921 tons, from 24,482 tons to 8,561 tons, the lowest since 1993.
From 1997 to 1998, the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 54%, or by 13,303 tons, from 24,482 tons to 11,179 tons.
From 1997 to 1998, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by .9%, or by 505 tons, from 56,393 tons, the greatest since 1969, to 55,888 tons. And this while the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 54%, or by 13,303 tons, from 24,482 tons to 11,179 tons.
This proves that the 505-ton decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna from 1997 to 1998 was not driven by overfishing.
From 1997 to 1998, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 6.3%, or by 5,628 tons, from 90,349 tons, the greatest since 1967, to 95,977 tons, the greatest since 1994.
From 1997 to 1998, the 5,628-ton increase in the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 57.7% less than the 13,303-ton decrease in the total Japanese catch.
Here, the Japanese have decreased the catch exponentially, and the payback from it was almost two thirds less than it should have been because of the downward pressure exerted by the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology.
In 1998, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 11,179 tons.
In 1998, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 55,888 tons.
In 1998, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 95,977 tons.
From 1998 to 1999, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 3.9%, or by 3,745 tons, from 95,977 tons, the greatest since 1994, to 92,232 tons.
And this while the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 101.9%, or by two times, or by 11,395 tons, from 11,179 tons to 22,574 tons, the greatest since 1982.
A decrease in the total stock biomass of just 3.9% in the face of a doubling of the total Japanese catch shows that the Japanese bluefin tuna was increasing exponentially in size and number from 1998 to 1999.
From 1998 to 1999, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 7.5%, or by 4,183 tons, from 55,888 tons, the greatest since 1970, to 51,705 tons.
And this while the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 101.9%, or by two times, or by 11,395 tons, from 11,179 tons to 22,574 tons, the greatest since 1982.
A decrease in the total spawning stock of just 7.5% in the face of a doubling of the total Japanese catch shows that the Japanese bluefin tuna was increasing exponentially in size and number from 1998 to 1999.
From 1998 to 1999, the 4,183-ton decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 63.3% less, or almost two thirds less, or 7,212 tons less than the 11,395-ton increase in the Japanese catch.
This shows that the Pacific bluefin tuna was increasing exponentially in size and number from 1998 to 1999.
From 1998 to 1999, the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 101.9%, or by two times, or by 11,395 tons, from 11,179 tons to 22,574 tons.
From 1998 to 1999, the 3,745-ton decrease in the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 67.1% less, or more than two thirds less, or 7,650 tons less than than the 11,395-ton increase in the Japanese catch.
This shows that the Pacific bluefin tuna was increasing exponentially in size and number from 1998 to 1999.
In 1999, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 22,574 tons.
In 1999, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 51,705 tons.
In 1999, isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 92,232 tons.
From 1999 to 2000, the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 10.4%, or by 2,268 tons, from 22,574 tons to 24,842 tons.
From 1999 to 2000, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 5.3%, or by 2,742 tons, from 51,705 tons to 48,963 tons.
From 1999 to 2000, the 2,742-ton decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 20.9% greater, or one fifth greater, or 474 tons greater than the 2,268-ton increase in the total Japanese catch.
This statistic shows that here, from 1999 to 2000, there is something other than fishing pressure which is reducing the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna.
That something is the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which, at this moment, was degrading the health of the ether at a rate exponentially greater than that at which it was improving as a baseline on the way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012.
From 1999 to 2000, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna by decreased by 16.6%, or by almost one fifth, or by 15,437 tons, from 92,232 tons to 76,795 tons, the lowest since 1992.
From 1999 to 2000, the 15,437-ton decrease in the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 580.6% greater, or almost seven times greater, or 13,169 tons greater than the 2,268-ton increase in the total Japanese catch.
This statistic shows that here, from 1999 to 2000, there is something other than fishing pressure which is reducing the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna.
That something is the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which, at this moment, was degrading the health of the ether at a rate exponentially greater than that at which it was improving as a baseline on the way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012.
In 2000, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 24,842 tons.
In 2000, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 48,936 tons.
In 2000, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 76,795 tons, the lowest since 1992.
From 2000 to 2001, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 1.6%, or by 1,275 tons, from 76,795 tons, the lowest since 1992, to 78,052 tons.
And this while the total Japanese catch increased by 43.3%, or by almost half, or by 2,268 tons.
This documents proper management of the species by the Japanese.
From 2000 to 2001, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 5.2%, or by 2,528 tons, from 48,936 tons to 46,408 tons.
And this while the total Japanese catch decreased by 43.3%, or by almost half, or by 10,768 tons, from 24,842 tons to 14,074 tons.
Thus, the entirety of this 2,528-ton decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna must be due to something other than fishing pressure.
That something is the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which, at this moment, was degrading the health of the ether at a rate exponentially greater than that at which it was improving as a baseline on the way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012.
From 2000 to 2001, the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 43.3%, or by almost half, or by 10,768 tons, from 24,842 tons to 14,074 tons.
In 2001, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 14,074 tons.
In 2001, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 46,408 tons.
In 2001, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 78,052 tons.
From 2001 to 2002, the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by .5%, or by 67 tons, from 14,074 tons to 14,007 tons.
From 2001 to 2002, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 4.1%, or by 1,916 tons, from 46,408 tons to 44,492 tons. And this while the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna by .5%, or by 67 tons, from 14,074 tons to 14,007 tons.
This proves that the entirety of this 1,916-ton decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna from 2001 to 2002 must be due to something other than fishing pressure.
That something is the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which, at this moment, was degrading the health of the ether at a rate exponentially greater than that at which it was improving as a baseline on the way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012.
From 2001 to 2002, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 2.5%, or by 1,942 tons, from 78,052 tons to 76,110 tons.
And this while the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna by .5%, or by 67 tons, from 14,074 tons to 14,007 tons.
This proves that the entirety of this 1,942-ton decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna from 2001 to 2002 was due to something other than fishing pressure.
That something is the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which, at this moment, was degrading the health of the ether at a rate exponentially greater than that at which it was improving as a baseline on the way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012.
In 2002, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 14,007 tons.
In 2002, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 44,492 tons.
In 2002, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 76,110 tons.
From 2002 to 2003, the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 27.3%, or by almost one third, or by 3,821 tons, from 14,007 tons to 10,186 tons, the lowest since 1993.
From 2002 to 2003, the 27.3% decrease in the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 5,360% greater, or more than fifty times greater than its .5% decrease from 2001 to 2002.
Here, from 2001 to 2003, the Japanese catch decreased hyper-exponentially.
From 2002 to 2003, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 1.5%, or by 686 tons, from 44,492 tons to 43,806 tons.
And this while the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 27.3%, or by almost one third, or by 3,821 tons, from 14,007 tons to 10,186 tons, the lowest since 1993.
This proves that the entirety of this 686-ton decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna from 2002 to 2003 was due to something other than fishing pressure.
That something is the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which, at this moment, was degrading the health of the ether at a rate exponentially greater than that at which it was improving as a baseline on the way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012.
From 2002 to 2003, the 1.5% decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 63.4% less, or almost two thirds less than its 4.1% decrease from 2001 to 2002.
From 2002 to 2003, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 9.7%, or by 7,403 tons, from 76,110 tons to 68,707 tons.
And this while the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 27.3%, or by almost one third, or by 3,821 tons, from 14,007 tons to 10,186 tons, the lowest since 1993.
This proves that the entirety of this 7,403-ton decrease in the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna from 2002 to 2003 must be due to something other than fishing pressure.
That something is the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which, at this moment, was degrading the health of the ether at a rate exponentially greater than that at which it was improving as a baseline on the way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012.
From 2002 to 2003, the 9.7% decrease in the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 288% greater, or almost four times greater than its 2.5% decrease from 2001 to 2002.
And this while, from 2002 to 2003, the 27.3% decrease in the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 5,360% greater, or more than fifty times greater than its .5% decrease from 2001 to 2002.
This documents exponentially decreasing stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna during a time period of exponetially-decreasing Japanese catches.
As you can see, the general “overfishing” is an example of the propaganda technique known as “the big lie”.
In 2003, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 10,186 tons, the lowest since 1993.
In 2003, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 43,806 tons.
In 2003, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 68,707 tons.
From 2003 to 2004, the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 35.8%, or by more than one third, or by 3,650 tons, from 10,186 tons to 13,836 tons.
From 2003 to 2004, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 16.2%, or by 7,105 tons, from 43,806 tons to 36,701 tons.
From 2003 to 2004, the 7,105-ton decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 30.2% less, or almost one third less, or 3,081 tons less than the 10,186-ton increase in the total Japanese catch during the same time period.
This shows that the size and number of the Pacific bluefin tuna were increasing strongly from 2003 to 2004.
From 2003 to 2004, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 3.3%, or by 2,724 tons, from 68,707 tons to 66,433 tons
From 2003 to 2004, the 3.3% decrease in the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 65.9% less, or basically two thirds less than its 9.7% decrease from 2002 to 2003.
From 2003 to 2004, the 2,724-ton decrease in the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 73.2% less, or 7,462 tons less than the 10,186-ton increase in the total Japanese catch during the same time period.
The previous two statistics show that the size and number of the Pacific bluefin tuna were increasing exponentially from 2003 to 2004.
In 2004, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 13,836 tons.
In 2004, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 36,701 tons.
In 2004, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 66,433 tons.
From 2004 to 2005, the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 52.8%, or by almost half, or by 7,305 tons, from 13,836 tons to 21,141 tons.
From 2004 to 2005, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna by 18.2%, or by 6,697 tons, from 36,701 tons to 30,004 tons, the lowest since 1992
From 2004 to 2005, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 16%, or by 10,655 tons, from 66,433 tons to 55,778 tons, the lowest since 1989.
From 2004 to 2005, the 10,655-ton decrease in the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 45.9% greater, or almost half again greater, or 3,350 tons greater than the 7,305-ton increase in the total Japanese catch.
The disappearance of these addition 3,350 tons of Pacific bluefin tuna from 2004 to 2005 can be directly attributed to the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which, at this moment, was degrading the health of the ether at a rate exponentially greater than that at which it was improving as a baseline on the way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012.
In 2005, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 21,141 tons.
In 2005, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 30,004 tons, the lowest since 1992.
In 2005, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 55,778 tons, the lowest since 1989.
From 2005 to 2006, the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 34.4%, or by more than one third, or by 7,279 tons, from 21,141 tons to 13,862 tons.
From 2005 to 2006, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 19.7% , or by basically one fifth, or by 5,915 tons, from 30,004 tons, the lowest since 1992, to 24,089 tons, the lowest since 1982.
And this while the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 34.4%, or by more than one third, or by 7,279 tons, from 21,141 tons to 13,862 tons
This proves that overfishing had absolutely nothing to do with the entirety of this 7,279-ton decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna from 2005 to 2006. This sudden, exponential decrease was driven by the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which, at this moment, was degrading the health of the ether at a rate exponentially greater than that at which it was improving as a baseline on the way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012.
From 2005 to 2006, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 21.3%, or by more than one fifth, or by 11,866 tons, from 55,778 tons to 43,912 tons, the lowest since 1989.
From 2005 to 2006, the 21.3% decrease in the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 33.1% greater, or one third greater than its 16% decrease from 2004 to 2005.
And this while the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 34.4%, or by more than one third, or by 7,279 tons, from 21,141 tons to 13,862 tons.
This proves that overfishing had nothing to do with the 11,866-ton decrease in the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna from 2005 to 2006. That sudden, exponential decrease was, in fact, driven by the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which was degrading the health of the ether at a rate exponentially greater than that at which it was improving as a baseline on the way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012.
In 2006, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 13,862 tons.
In 2006, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 24,089 tons, the lowest since 1982.
In 2006, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 43,912 tons, the lowest since 1989.
From 2006 to 2007, the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 2.9%, or by 406 tons, from 13,862 tons to 14,268 tons.
From 2006 to 2007, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 20.9%, or by 5,028 tons, from 24,089 tons to 19,061 tons.
From 2006 to 2007, the 5,028-ton decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 993% greater, or basically eleven times greater, or 4,568 tons greater than the 460-ton decrease from 2005 to 2006.
This proves that overfishing had nothing to do with the disappearance of 4,568 tons of the spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna from 2006 to 2007. That disappearance was, in fact, driven by the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which, at this moment, was degrading the health of the ether at a rate exponentially greater than that at which it was improving as a baseline on the way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012.
From 2006 to 2007, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna by .33%, or by 147 tons, from 43,912 tons to 43,765 tons.
From 2006 to 2007, the .33% decrease in the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 98.5% less, or almost infinitely less than its 21.3% decrease from 2005 to 2006.
Here, from 2006 to 2007, with the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012 hoving into view, we see the great positive change in the health of the ether beginning in earnest.
From 2006 to 2007, the 147-ton decrease in the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 63.7% less, or two thirds less, or 259 tons less than the 406-ton increase in the total Japanese catch.
This demonstrates that the majority of the 147-ton decrease in the the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna from 2006 to 2007 was driven by low-wavelength microwave radiation, and not overfishing.
In 2007, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 14,268 tons.
In 2007, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 19,061 tons.
In 2007, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 43,765 tons.
From 2007 to 2008, the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 22%, or by more than one fifth, or by 3,144 tons, from 14,268 tons to 17,412 tons.
From 2007 to 2008, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna by 22.3%, or by one fifth, or by 4,256 tons, from 19,061 tons to 14,805 tons, the lowest since 1987.
From 2007 to 2008, the 4,256-ton decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 35.3% greater, or more than one third greater, or 1,121 tons greater than the 3,144-ton increase in the total Japanese catch.
This proves that overfishing had nothing to do with the disappearance of 1,121 tons of the spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna from 2006 to 2007. That disappearance was, in fact, driven by the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which was degrading the health of the ether at a rate exponentially greater than that at which it was improving as a baseline on the way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012.
From 2007 to 2008, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 9.4%, or by 4,119 tons, from 43,765 tons to 39,646 tons, the lowest since 1988
From 2007 to 2008, the 4,119-ton decrease in the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 31% greater, or almost one third greater, or 975 tons greater than the 3,144-ton increase in the total Japanese catch.
This proves that overfishing had nothing to do with the disappearance of 975 tons of the spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna from 2007 to 2008. That disappearance was, in fact, driven by the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which was degrading the health of the ether at a rate exponentially greater than that at which it was improving as a baseline on the way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012.
In 2008, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 17,412 tons.
In 2008, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 14,805 tons, the lowest since 1987.
In 2008, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 39,646 tons, the lowest since 1988.
From 2008 to 2010, the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased exponentially.
From 2008 to 2010, the the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased exponentially.
From 2008 to 2010, the exponential decreases in the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna and the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna occurred simultaneously.
This proves that his proves that overfishing was not the driver of the exponential decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna from 2008 to 2010.
That decrease was, in fact, driven by the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which was degrading the health of the ether at a rate exponentially greater than that at which it was improving as a baseline on the way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012.
From 2008 to 2009, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 22.9%, or by more than one fifth, or by 3,383 tons, from 14,805 tons, the lowest since 1987, to 11,422 tons, the lowest in history.
And this even as the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 16.9%, or by almost one fifth, or by 2,942 tons, from 17,412 tons to 14,470 tons.
This proves that overfishing had nothing to do with the disappearance of 3,383 tons of the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna from 2008 to 2009. That disappearance was, in fact, driven by the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which was degrading the health of the ether at a rate exponentially greater than that at which it was improving as a baseline on the way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012.
From 2008 to 2009, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 16.9%, or by almost one fifth, or by 2,942 tons, from 17,412 tons to 14,470 tons.
In 2009, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 11,422 tons, the lowest in history.
In 2009, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 14,470 tons.
In 2009, per isc.fra.go.jp, the stock biomass of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 38,053 tons.
From 2009 to 2010, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 40.8%, or by almost half, or by 5,909 tons, from 14,470 tons to 8,561 tons, the lowest since 1993.
From 2009 to 2010, the 40.8% decrease in the the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna was 141.4% greater, or almost two and a half times greater than its 16.9% decrease from 2008 to 2009.
This exponential decrease in the the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna proves that the Japanese were properly managing the population of the Pacific bluefin tuna from 2008 to 2010.
From 2009 to 2010, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 5.1%, or by tons, from 11,422 tons, the second-lowest in history, to 10,837 tons, the lowest in history.
And this even as the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 40.8%, or by almost half, or by 5,909 tons, from 14,470 tons to 8,561 tons, the lowest since 1993.
This proves that overfishing had nothing to do with the disappearance of 11,422 tons of the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna from 2009 to 2010. That disappearance was, in fact, driven by the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which was degrading the health of the ether at a rate exponentially greater than that at which it was improving as a baseline on the way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012.
The general “overfishing” is an example of the propaganda technique known as “the big lie”.
The truth is that the species was being driven out of existence by the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology.
From 2009 to 2010, the 5.1% decrease in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 168.4% greater, or more than one and a half times greater than its 1.9% average annual decrease from 1961 to 2009.
And this while the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 40.8%, or by almost half, or by 5,909 tons, from 14,470 tons to 8,561 tons, the lowest since 1993.
This proves that overfishing had nothing to do with the disappearance of 11,422 tons of the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna from 2009 to 2010. That disappearance was, in fact, driven by the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology, which was degrading the health of the ether at a rate exponentially greater than that at which it was improving as a baseline on the way up to and through the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012.
The general “overfishing” is an example of the propaganda technique known as “the big lie”.
The truth is that the species was being driven out of existence by the low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as technology.
In 2010, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 8,561 tons, the lowest since 1993.
In 2010, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 10,837 tons, the lowest in history.
In 2010, the 10,837-ton total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna represented 28.4% of the total stock biomass of the species of 38,053 tons.
In 2010, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 38,053 tons.
In 2010, the total Japanse catch of Pacific bluefin tuna of 8,561 tons represented 22.5% of the total stock biomass of the species of 38,053 tons.
From 2010 to 2022, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by an annual average of 11,137.2 tons.
That’s not possible according to conventional Biology.
From 2010 to 2022, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 1,233.2%, or by more than thirteen times, or by 133,646 tons, from 10,837 tons, the lowest in history, to 144,483 tons, the second-greatest in history.
From 2010 to 2014, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by an annual average of 10.4%.
From 2010 to 2014, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by an annual average of 1,916.5 tons.
From 2010 to 2014, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 41.4%, or by more than two thirds, or by 7,666 tons, from 10,837 tons, the lowest in history, to 18,503 tons, the greatest since 2007.
From 2010 to 2011, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna by 55.8%, or more than half, or by 4,777 tons, from 8,561 tons to 13,338 tons.
From 2010 to 2011, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 11.6%, or by 1,259 tons, from 10,837 tons, the lowest in history, to 12,096 tons.
And this even as the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 55.8%, or more than half, or by 4,777 tons, from 8,561 tons to 13,338 tons.
This is proof of sound fishery management by the Japanese, and shows that overfishing has nothing to do with anything.
As you can see, the general “overfishing” is an example of the propaganda technique known as “the big lie”.
From 2010 to 2011, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 2.2%, or by 848 tons, from 38,053 tons to 38,901 tons.
From 2011 to 2012, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 22%, or by 2,662 tons, from 12,096 tons to 14,758 tons.
From 2011 to 2012, the 22% increase in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 89.6% greater, or almost two times greater than its 11.6% increase from 210 to 2011.
Here, from 2011 to 2012, as we reach the end of the Mayan “long count”, the Pacific bluefin tuna is increasing exponentially in size and number, because the health of the ether is inexorably improving, and the size, fertlity, longevity and very existence of any organism all vary directly with the health of the ether.
From 2011 to 2012, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna by 5.5%, or by 2,157 tons, from 38,901 tons to 41,058 tons.
From 2011 to 2012, the 5.5% increase in the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 150% greater, or two and a half times greater than its 2.2% increase from 2010 to 2011.
Here, from 2011 to 2012, as we reach the end of the Mayan “long count”, the Pacific bluefin tuna is increasing exponentially in size and number, because the health of the ether is inexorably improving, and the size, fertlity, longevity and very existence of any organism all vary directly with the health of the ether.
In 2011, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 13,338 tons.
This is the last year that isc.fra.go.jp documented the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna.
The International Scientific Committee for Tuna and Tuna-like Species in the North Pacific Ocean’s omission of the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna from 2012 to this writing in 2026 is an example of the propaganda technique known as the News Blackout.
In 2011, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 12,096 tons.
In 2011, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 38,901 tons.
From 2012 to 2013, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 13.1%, or by 1,945 tons, from 14,758 tons to 16,703 tons.
From 2012 to 2013, the 13.1% increase in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 40.4% less, or almost half again less than its 22% increase from 2011 to 2012.
Since isc.fra.go.jp blacked out the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna from 2012 to this writing in 2026, we cannot speculate on this statistic.
From 2012 to 2013, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 20.3%, or by 8,325 tons, from 41,058 tons to 49,383 tons, the greatest since 2005.
From 2012 to 2013, the 20.3% increase in the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 55% greater, or more than half again greater than its 13.1% increase from 2012 to 2013.
Here, from 2012 to 2013, as pass the end of the Mayan “long count” and move forward into the new Golden Age foretold by the Hindu’s, the Pacific bluefin tuna is increasing exponentially in size and number because the health of the ether is inexorably improving, and the size, fertlity, longevity and very existence of any organism all vary directly with the health of the ether.
From 2012 to 2013, the 20.3% increase in the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 54.9% greater, or more than half again greater than the 13.1% increase in the total spawning stock biomass of the species.
This documents an exponential increase in young tuna which have not yet reached spawning age.
In 2012, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 14,758 tons.
In 2012, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 41,058 tons.
In 2012, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 41,058 tons.
From 2013 to 2015, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by an annual average of 3.4%.
From 2013 to 2015, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 6.8%, or by 3,342 tons, from 49,383 tons to 52,725 tons,
From 2013 to 2014, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 3%, or by 1,529 tons, from 49,383 tons to 47,854 tons.
From 2013 to 2014, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 3.4% (average).
From 2013 to 2014, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 10.8%, or by 1,800 tons, from 16,703 tons to 18,503 tons.
In 2013, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 49,383 tons, the greatest since 2005.
In 2013, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 16,703 tons.
On April 19, 2013, Commercial Fisheries News’ Rich Ruais, the executive director of the American Bluefin Tuna Association, said “western Atlantic bluefin tuna have never been overfished; overfishing is not occurring; their biomass is above the maximum sustainable yield; and a higher commercial quota is fully justified.”
Ruais has been working with the bluefin-tuna industry since 1991.
This documents the fact that the general “overfishing” is an example of the propaganda technique known as “the big lie”.
From 2014 to 2018, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 52.5%, or by more than half, or by 9,725 tons, from 18,503 tons to 28,228 tons.
From 2014 to 2018, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by an annual average of 13.1%.
From 2014 to 2018, the 13.1% average annual increase in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 26% greater, or more than one fourth greater than its 10.4% average annual increase from 2010 to 2014.
Here, from 2014 to 2018, as pass the end of the Mayan “long count” and move forward into the new Golden Age foretold by the Hindu’s, the Pacific bluefin tuna is increasing exponentially in size and number because the health of the ether is inexorably improving, and the size, fertlity, longevity and very existence of any organism all vary directly with the health of the ether.
From 2014 to 2018, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by an annual average of 2,431.3 tons.
From 2014 to 2018, the 2,431.3-ton average average annual increase in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 26.9% greater than its 1,916.5-ton average annual increase from 2010 to 2014.
Here, from 2014 to 2018, as pass the end of the Mayan “long count” and move forward into the new Golden Age foretold by the Hindu’s, the Pacific bluefin tuna is increasing exponentially in size and number because the health of the ether is inexorably improving, and the size, fertlity, longevity and very existence of any organism all vary directly with the health of the ether.
From 2014 to 2015, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 3.4% (average).
From 2014 to 2015, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 10.1%, or by 4,871 tons, from 47,854 tons to 52,725 tons.
From 2014 to 2015, the 10.1% increase in the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 197% greater, or basically three times greater than its 3.4% (average) increase from 2013 to 2014.
Here, from 2014 to 2015, as pass the end of the Mayan “long count” and move forward into the new Golden Age foretold by the Hindu’s, the Pacific bluefin tuna is increasing exponentially in size and number because the health of the ether is inexorably improving, and the size, fertlity, longevity and very existence of any organism all vary directly with the health of the ether.
From 2014 to 2015, the price of the first tuna sold at the Tsukiji fish auction in Japan decreased by 47%, or by almost half, from $70,000 to $37,000.
That’s because prices decrease either when supply increases, demand decreases, or both.
This statistic proves that the Pacific bluefin tuna increased exponentially in size and number from 2014 to 2015, which proves, in turn, that the general "ovefishing is an example of the propaganda technique known as “the big lie”.
Here, from 2014 to 2018, as we pass beyond the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012, the Pacific bluefin tuna is increasing exponentially in size and number because the health of the ether is inexorably improving, and the size, fertlity, longevity and very existence of any organism all vary directly with the health of the ether.
On January 1, 2014, the first tuna at the Tsukiji fish auction in Japan sold for $70,000.
On January 5, 2014, Atlantic’s Svati Kirsten Narula explained “Sushinomics: How Bluefin Tuna Became a Million-Dollar Fish”.
When, in fact, four days earlier, on January 1, 2014, the first tuna at the Tsukiji fish auction in Japan sold for $70,000.
Further, from 2014 to 2015, the price of the first tuna sold at the Tsukiji fish auction in Japan decreased by 47%, or by almost half, from $70,000 to $37,000.
These statistics prove that the general “How Bluefin Tuna Became a Million-Dollar Fish” is an example of the propaganda technique known as “the big lie”.
I have exposed the duplicity of the Kirsten Narula and her employer, Atlantic Magazine by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
Here’s a picture of Svati, in a Satanic-green top, against a Satanic-purple background, where she’s pointedly turned her head an looked askance to emphasize her left eye.
(Atlantic Magazine’s Svati Narula)
I have included Svati’s photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist Freemason of marginal influence looks like.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. Generational Satanists comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
How long do you think that these people have left in power, now?
Please consider doing what you can to speed the transition.
From 2014 to 2015, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna by 13.6%, or by 2,511 tons, from 18,503 tons to 21,014 tons.
From 2014 to 2015, the 13.6% increase in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 25.9% greater, or one fourth greater than its 10.8% increase from 2014 to 2015.
Here, from 2014 to 2015, as we pass the end of the Mayan “long count” and move forward into the new Golden Age foretold by the Hindu’s, the Pacific bluefin tuna is increasing exponentially in size and number because the health of the ether is inexorably improving, and the size, fertlity, longevity and very existence of any organism all vary directly with the health of the ether.
In 2014, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 18,503 tons.
In 2014, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 47,854 tons.
From 2015 to 2016, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 19%, or by 3,995 tons from 21,014 tons to 25,009 tons.
From 2015 to 2016, the 19% increase in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 39.7% greater, or more than one third greater than its 13.6% increase from 2014 to 2015.
Here, from 2015 to 2016, as we pass the end of the Mayan “long count” and move forward into the new Golden Age foretold by the Hindu’s, the Pacific bluefin tuna is increasing exponentially in size and number because the health of the ether is inexorably improving, and the size, fertlity, longevity and very existence of any organism all vary directly with the health of the ether.
From 2015 to 2016, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 18.7%, or by almost one fifth, or by 9,344 tons, from 52,725 tons to 62,069 tons.
From 2015 to 2016, the 18.7% increase in the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 85.1% greater, or almost two times greater than its 10.1% increase from 2014 to 2015.
Here, from 2015 to 2016, as we pass the end of the Mayan “long count” and move forward into the new Golden Age foretold by the Hindu’s, the Pacific bluefin tuna is increasing exponentially in size and number because the health of the ether is inexorably improving, and the size, fertlity, longevity and very existence of any organism all vary directly with the health of the ether.
In 2015, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 52,725 tons.
In 2015, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 21,014 tons.
In 2016, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 25,009 tons.
In 2016, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 62,069 tons.
From 2016 to 2017, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 2.5%, or by 623 tons, from 25,009 tons to 25,632 tons.
From 2016 to 2017, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 14.7%, or by 9,159 tons, from 62,069 tons to 71,228 tons.
In 2017, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 25,632 tons
In 2017, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 71,228 tons.
From 2017 to 2018, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 10.1%, or by 2,956 tons, from 25,632 tons to 28,228 tons.
From 2017 to 2018, the 10.1% increase in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 304% greater, or more than four times greater than its 2.5% increase from 2016 to 2017.
Here, from 2017 to 2018, as we pass the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012 and move forward into the new Golden Age foretold by the Hindu’s, the Pacific bluefin tuna is increasing exponentially in size and number because the health of the ether is inexorably improving, and the size, fertlity, longevity and very existence of any organism all vary directly with the health of the ether.
From 2017 to 2018, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 15.4%, or by 10,984 tons, from 71,228 tons to 82,212 tons.
From 2017 to 2018, the 15.4% increase in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 4.8% greater than its 14.7% increase from 2016 to 2017.
Here, from 2017 to 2018, as we pass the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012 and move forward into the new Golden Age foretold by the Hindu’s, the Pacific bluefin tuna is increasing exponentially in size and number because the health of the ether is inexorably improving, and the size, fertlity, longevity and very existence of any organism all vary directly with the health of the ether.
From 2018 to 2022, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 411.8%, or by more than five times, or by 116,255 tons, from 28,228 tons, the greatest since 2005, to 144,483 tons, the greatest in history.
From 2018 to 2022, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by an annual average of 29,056 tons.
From 2018 to 2022, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by an annual average of 103%.
From 2018 to 2022, the 103% average annual increase in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 686.3% greater, or almost eight times greater than its 13.1% average annual increase from 2014 to 2018.
From 2018 to 2022, the 686.3% positive variance in the increase in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna versus 2014 to 2018 was 2,539.6% greater, or more than twenty six times greater than its 26% positive variance from 2014 to 2018 versus 2010 to 2014.
From 2018 to 2022, the 29,056-ton average annual increase in the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 1,095% greater, or basically eleven times greater than its 2,431.3-ton average annual increase from 2014 to 2018.
Here, from 2018 to 2022, as we pass the end of the Mayan “long count” in 2012 and move forward into the new Golden Age foretold by the Hindu’s, the Pacific bluefin tuna is increasing exponentially in size and number because the health of the ether is inexorably improving, and the size, fertlity, longevity and very existence of any organism all vary directly with the health of the ether.
In 2018, per Lauretta et al. in 2025, the Atlantic bluefin tuna spawning stock biomass was 21,000 mt.
In 2018, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 28,228 tons.
In 2018, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was 82,212 tons.
In 2019, tuna prices, including bluefin tuna prices, were at their lowest level in history.
In 2019, the 1st bluefin tuna sold at the annual Tsukiji fish auction in Japan sold for $3 million, the greatest in history.
When, in fact, in 2019, tuna prices, including bluefin tuna prices, were at their lowest level in history.
As you can see, the $3 million sale price of the 1st bluefin tuna sold at the annual Tsukiji fish auction in Japan is an example of the propaganda technique known as “the big lie”.
The generational Satanist Freemasons who run the Tsukiji fish auction in Japan have put it forward because, as propagandists, they know that the key to any successful Confidence game is misdirection.
I have exposed the duplicity of the Tsukiji fish auction by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In 2019, Business Insider wrung its hands and questioned “Why is bluefin tuna so expensive and why is canned tuna so cheap?"
When, in fact, in 2019, bluefin tuna prices were at their lowest level in history.
As you can see, the general rhetorical question “why is bluefin tuna so expensive?” is an example of the propaganda technique known as “the big lie”.
I have exposed the duplicity of Business Insider by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In 2022, per the 2024 ISC stock assessment, the Pacific bluefin tuna spawning stock biomass was 144,483 tons, second only to its all-time high of 156,302 tons in 1961.
In 2022, per the 2024 ISC stock assessment, the number of spawning bluefin reached 23.2 percent of the potential unfished spawning stock in 2022.
In 2023, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna was 8,811 tons.
In 2024, per isc.fra.go.jp, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna was 9,726 tons.
The article went on to say "Continuing from 2022, this was the highest level since the strict catch upper limit was implemented in 2015 in accordance with the WCPFC
Conservation and Management Measure (CMM)."
They’re pretending that they’ve cut the catch to protect the “endangered” Pacific bluefin tuna from “overfishing”.
When, in fact, from 2010 to 2022, the total spawning stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna increased by 1,233.2%, or by more than thirteen times, or by 133,646 tons, from 10,837 tons, the lowest in history, to 144,483 tons, the second-greatest in history.
I have exposed the duplicity of the government of Japan by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
The catch limits are, in actuality, examples of what is known as “price rigging”.
price rigging - noun - the illegal practice of manipulating or artificially controlling prices in a market to gain an unfair advantage.
On June 25, 2024, fisheries.noaa.gov said “New stock assessment reveals largest recorded biomass since assessments began”.
The uncredited author did not provide any data on the biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna.
That is an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
The article goes on to say “Overfishing in the late 1990s and 2000s reduced the estimated bluefin biomass to a historic low of 2 percent of its potential unfished level in 2009–2012. This alarming decline prompted multilateral action beginning in 2011 to stem overfishing and rebuild the bluefin stock. The goal was to rebuild to at least 20 percent of the spawning stock biomass by 2034.”
When, in fact, from from 1997 to 2010, during the time period of this only-generally described “overfishing”, the total Japanese catch of Pacific bluefin tuna decreased by 65%, or by almost two thirds, or by 15,921 tons, from 24,482 tons to 8,561 tons, the lowest since 1993.
Further, from 1997 to 2010, the percentage of the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin comprised by the Japanese catch decreased by 16.7%, or by almost one fifth, from 27% to 22.5%
Further still, from 2002 to 2003, the 27.3% decrease in the total Japanese catch of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 5,360% greater, or more than fifty times greater than its .5% decrease from 2001 to 2002. Even as, from 2002 to 2003, the 9.7% decrease in the total biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna was 288% greater, or almost four times greater than its 2.5% decrease from 2001 to 2002.
This documents exponentially-decreasing stock biomass of the Pacific bluefin tuna during a time period of exponetially-decreasing Japanese catches.
As you can see, the general “overfishing” is an example of the propaganda technique known as “the big lie”.
I have exposed the duplicity of NOAA by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In 2025, per pnas.org, the biomass of the Atlantic bluefin tuna was 42,387 mt.
From 2025 to 2026, per noaa.gov, the spawning area of the Atlantic bluefin tuna expanded exponentially from a small spot in the Northwest Caribbean to the entirety of the Eastern Atlantic ocean.
In 2026, per pnas.org, the breeding biomass of the Japanese bluefin tuna was “144,000 tons”, the greatest in history.
This is an obvious falsehood, in that, in 2022, per the 2024 ISC stock assessment, the Pacific bluefin tuna spawning stock biomass was 144,483 tons, second only to its all-time high of 156,302 tons in 1961.
In March 2026, fisheries.noaa.gov said “New research finds bluefin tuna may have a nearly continuous spawning area from the Northwest Caribbean to the Slope Sea—a much broader spawning area than previously thought.”
This paints the false picture that the spawning area of the Atlantic bluefin tuna had always run from the Northwest Caribbean up to Long Island, only everybody had somehow missed it, up until 2026.
When, in fact, from 2025 to 2026, the spawning area of the Atlantic bluefin tuna expanded exponentially from a small spot in the Northwest Caribbean to the entirety of the Eastern Atlantic ocean.
Jeff Miller, Honolulu, HI, July 22, 2026
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected].
