Before I begin, a warm welcome to Ewa and Anthony, who bring the readership to 38.
I’m incredibly embarrassed to say Ewa e-mailed me a year and a half ago, and I only found it now through a random search of my e-mail. I’m going to take that as a fortuitous occurrence.
If anyone reading this has ever reached out to me and not been able to get through, please try again. I can’t tell you how much stuff I find in “junk”, that’s really key, important stuff, which in no way should have gone to junk. Like, people who’d e-mailed me previously, whom I’d corresponded with.
AQUATIC LIFE IS BOOMING AND BURGEONING TO AN UNPRECEDENTED EXTENT REGARDLESS OF GEOGRAPHY, BECAUSE THE SIZE, FERTILITY AND LONGEVITY OF ANY ORGANISM VARIES DIRECTLY WITH THE HEALTH OF ITS ETHERIC ENVIRONMENT.
Great positive changes are underway at every level of our reality. They began in earnest in 2012, and have been increasing in speed and magnitude. I began writing this series of articles, entitled “Positive Changes That Are Occurring”, in July of 2013.
These historically-unprecedented positive changes are being driven by many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices based on the work of Wilhelm Reich and, Karl Hans Welz. Since Don Croft first fabricated tactical Orgonite in 2000, its widespread, ongoing and ever-increasing distribution has been unknitting and transforming the ancient Death energy matrix built and expanded by our dark masters, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. And, as a result, the Ether is returning to its natural state of health and vitality.
One of those changes is that aquatic life is booming and burgeoning to an unprecedented extent regardless of geography, because the size, fertility and longevity of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.
Upstream Fish counts on the river Tyne in England well more than doubled from 19,229 in 1996 to 43,189 in 2015, a 124% increase.
Chilean fish exports increased 10.8% in the 1st Quarter of 2012, year-over-year.
After peaking in March 2014, fish prices have been falling, with the FAO fish price index hitting a five-year low in July 2015. That’s because prices drop either when supply increases, demand decreases, or both. In this case, increasing supply is driving down fish prices.
In September 2015, the Kuwait Times attributed falling fish prices in Kuwait to “the boycott campaign.”
Where “the boycott campaign” is a false plausible-deniability excuse, put forward to cover up the increase in supply that is driving down fish prices in Kuwait. The propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The Kuwait Times is using conscious deception with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.
In 2016, Nature News said that a “fall” in fish catch “threatened human health”. While Ireland’s seafood sector increased 7% from 2016 to 2017.
Can you see how “fall” and “threatened” are both general? Whereas the statistic that I’ve rebutted the propaganda with is specific.
“Nature News” is an organ of the state, and is using conscious deception with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.
In July 2016, the Financial Times said that the international fish trade “faced Brexit impact”. While Ireland’s seafood sector increased 7% from 2016 to 2017.
“Brexit impact” is a false (and also general) plausible-deniability excuse, put forward to cover up the increase in supply that is driving down fish prices in all the nations.
The propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
Fish prices in Oman were said to have “dipped further” in 2017 as supplies “soared”. That’s an example of an increase in supply leading to a drop in fish prices.
Can you see how both “dipped” and “soared” are both general?
In May 2017, undercurrentnews.com said “Fish oil prices collapse amid drop in supplements market”.
Where “collapse” is general. “DROP in supplements market” is also general. It’s a false plausible-deniability excuse, put forward to cover up the exponential increase in supply that is driving down fish prices in all the nations. The propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
In December 2017, the U.K.’s Guardian said “Mass starvation is humanity’s fate if we keep flogging the land to death”, and “Despite a massive increase in effort (bigger boats, bigger engines, more gear), the worldwide fish catch is declining by roughly 1% a year, as populations collapse.”
We know that the claims that the worldwide fish catch is decreasing by 1% and that fish populations are collapsing are both false because Bocaccio and darkblotched rockfish stocks on the west coast of the United States, which were declared overfished in 1999 and 2000, respectively, were declared rebuilt in 2017, both well before their original target dates. And because we know that the world fish trade hit an all-time high in 2017. And because we know that India’s seafood exports increased 25% in the first quarter of 2017. And because we know that Norway’s seafood exports increased 25% in 2017.
The U.K.’s Guardian is a Mouthpiece of the State, using conscious deception with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.
Salmon bait fish were said to have “rebounded” on Lake Michigan in 2017. Can you see how “rebounded” is general?
The value of Sri Lanka’s seafood exports increased 18% in the 1st Quarter of 2017.
The Solomon Islands recorded a $57.5m trade surplus in the 1st Quarter of 2017, “the increase mainly attributed to $52.1m of fish loin exports to Italy.” Where the author used the bizarre term “fish loins” to gymnastically avoid saying “tuna”. It’s to keep the subject as unsearchable as possible.
China’s seafood imports rose 17.1% year-on-year from Jan-June 2017.
Sri Lanka’s seafood exports increased 40% in the first six months of 2017.
In January 2017, VnExpress said that Vietnam’s seafood exports “could be left fishing in 2017”.
Vietnamese seafood exports increased 15% in the first seven months of 2017.
Vietnamese seafood exports hit $8bn for the first time in 2017.
Seafood exports in Pakistan increased 12.99% in February 2017, year-over-year.
Pakistan’s fish exports during April 2017 were 33% higher than the previous April.
Pakistan’s fish exports increased 17% in June 2017.
State fish records “fell like rain” in Wisconsin in 2017. Can you see how “fell like rain” is general?
In August 2017, bloomberg.com said “North Korean Seafood Exports to China Surge Before Ban”.
The article goes on to say “North Korean seafood exports to China surged to more than $50 million dollars in July, Chinese customs data showed, rising before a complete ban starts Sept. 5 under a United Nations Security Council resolution.”
We know from a previous article that seafood exports generated US$190 million for North Korea in 2016. Here, they’re giving us just the July, 2017 number, which is the vague “more than $50 million dollars”. That vagueness is a hallmark of propaganda. $50M is more than 25% of $190M, in just one month…but that’s as close as we’re going to get on the numbers, for now.
The ruse here is that the exports surged because North Korea quick sold a bunch of extra fish – versus the truth, that they sold all they caught. They note the value, but carefully omit the volume. And they let you know what the value number surged up to, but carefully withheld where it had surged from, so you couldn’t get any idea of the percentage increase.
Can you see how the headline says only generally “exports SURGE”? The propagandist knows that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines. They’ve done what they could to hedge by, in journalistic parlance, “burying” information about the scope of the positive change in the body of the article.
In August 2017, undercurrentnews.com said “Vietnam seafood exports up 18% in value so far this year”. Where there is, pointedly, no mention of volume.
The article continues: “Vietnam shipped $749 million worth of seafood abroad in August, bringing seafood exports in the first eight months of 2017 to $5.13 billion, up 18.1% from the same period last year, reports Vietnam Plus. According to the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, the largest buyers of Vietnamese seafood included the US, Japan, China and South Korea, accounting for 55.6% of total exports. Export value to China showed the biggest increase, up 57.2%, followed by Japan 30.8%, the UK (30.1%), South Korea (28.8%), the Netherlands (25.3%) and Canada (20.7%).”
The international news blackout that is in place on this subject demands the downplaying, or in this case the complete omission of volume numbers, which, since increased volume drives down price, are even higher than the value numbers that are exclusively displayed here.
Pakistan’s fish exports increased 19.63% in the two months from August 2017 to October 2017.
The value of fish exports in Myanmar increased 16% from 2017 to 2018. We don’t know the volume number because the international news blackout that is in place on this subject demands the downplaying or omission of volume numbers, which clarify that the “Poor Mother Gaia is Dying” confidence game is just that.
The world’s fishmeal and fish oil production almost doubled from 2017 to 2018.
Scotland’s seafood exports to Japan increased more than tripled from 2017 to 2018.
Peruvian fish exports almost doubled from 2017 to 2018.
In January 2018, xinhuanet.com said “Norway - Seafood exports worth record-high NOK 94.5 billion in 2017”.
Where “record HIGH” is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of statistics that would provide specific insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
“WORTH” record high explains that it’s a revenue record. There’s no way to compare the number to the previous record, so your insight into the magnitude even of that increase is blunted and obscured. The volume goes completely unmentioned.
The article continues: “Norway exported 2.6 million tonnes of seafood worth NOK 94.5 billion in 2017. This is an increase in value of 3 per cent, or NOK 3 billion, and an increase in volume of 7 per cent.”
There’s a strict rule in journalism that you list the largest numbers first, and the rest in descending order. Here the author has blatantly, brazenly inverted it, in an attempt to draw your attention away from the historically unprecedented and unexplained increase in the marine harvest.
Because you’ve been conditioned to think otherwise from birth, your consciousness literally cannot accept that the marine environment is booming and burgeoning to a level not seen in our lifetimes, or perhaps ever.
In the first five months of 2018 Peruvian fish exports for human consumption rose 80% compared with 2017.
Marine Harvest Scotland harvested a record 17,772 tons of gutted weight in the first quarter of 2017, a new record 40% higher than the 1st Quarter of the previous year.
The highest harvest volumes in all history were said to be “due to higher average weight and hence more biomass in sea at the start of the year, combined with strong production and improved fish health.”
They don’t mention what strong production is, or what drove it. “Highest” harvest volumes are said to be due to “higher weight”, but there’s no specific mention as to why, specifically, all the fish in the sea are suddenly 40% fatter. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
In March 2017, an article which I am now unable to locate said “Atlantic fish and seafood companies casting a wide net to increase exports”.
Where the author plays the “they’re selling harder than ever” ruse to suggest that they’re moving product - fresh fish, no less! - that had previously gone unsold. It’s a spectacular, childish, moronic falsehood, put forward because the propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
In July 2017, seafoodsource.com said “Chinese crayfish, shrimp exports jump in 2017”. Can you see how “jump” is general? It implies that the number went up, but will come right back down again, like when you jump.
They’re printing the article mid-year so that future searches on 2017 Chinese seafood exports will only reveal the smaller numbers that the author has, in journalistic parlance, “buried” below.
The article continues: “Other Chinese seafood exports were also up so far in 2017.”
Where “other” is general, and “up SO FAR” implies that they might go right back down.
The article continues: “Shrimp exports rose 11.6 percent in value and 17.9 percent in volume terms, while shipments of tilapia were up 9.14 percent in value and 6.68 percent in volume in the first four months of the year, according to the ministry data.”
They used “rose 11.6%” because “rose” is softer than “increased”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black Sun cult that has run things in all the nations, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
In journalism, there’s a strict rule where you list larger numbers first. Can you see how, in shrimp exports, they broke the rule, where volume is larger, and then, in shrimp value, where the value increase is larger, they listed it first. It’s perverted, it’s psychotic, it’s bald-facedly obvious.
The article continues: “Chinese crayfish exports have soared this year, according to official statistics released by the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture.
Exports of crayfish jumped 68 percent in volume terms and 60.4 percent in value terms in the first four months of 2017. The recently released data didn’t include absolute figures for either volume or value.”
The numbers are obviously highly specific. The author hung the hedge “didn’t include absolute figures” on the end because they know that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The author doesn’t venture any guess as to what is driving the historically-unprecedented increase in crayfish and shrimp production in China.
Clearly, there’s been some huge positive change in the environment of crayfish and shrimp in China in the first four months of 2017.
In July 2017, the moronically-named mynewsdesk.com said “Norwegian seafood exports break new records in first half of 2017”.
They’re printing the article mid-year so that future searches on 2017 Norwegian seafood exports will only reveal the smaller numbers that the author has, in journalistic parlance, “buried” below.
The article goes on to say that “Never before has Norway exported a greater value of seafood than in the first six months of 2017. The increase is due primarily to record-high salmon prices but also to strong growth in export volumes to the U.S. and Asian markets.”
The international news blackout that is in place on this subject demands the downplaying or omission of volume numbers that expose the “Poor Mother is Dying” confidence game for what it is. The author leads with “value”, and then carefully “buries” volume at the bottom, to minimize it.
Clearly, there’s been some huge positive change in the environment of marine life in Norway in the first half of 2017.
In July 2017, Reuters said “Hunchun’s exports up”. Where, under the false guise of familiarity, the author has omitted “China”, to make the subject drastically less searchable. And “exports UP” is general, to blunt any specific insight the reader might have into the great positive change.
The article continues: “So far in 2017, Hunchun’s seafood trade appears to be going strong, though; in the first quarter of 2017 the town’s seafood exports were up, according to the most recent trade figures from Jilin provincial authority, although the figures seem to be at odds with earlier, much larger figures.”
Where “so far” and “appears to be” and “though” and “although the figures seem to be at odds with earlier, much larger figures” are all general hedges, to blunt any detailed insight the reader might have into the great positive change the article documents.
The article continues: “In the first three months of this year, Hunchun’s seafood exports rose 89% year-on-year to $22.2m in value, according to a report published on the authority’s website dated April. Seafood imports also increased – up 47% y-o-y to $20.1m in value.”
The international news blackout that is in place on this subject demand the downplaying or omission of volume numbers, which expose the “Poor Mother Gaia is Dying” confidence game for what it is. These stunning figures are smaller than the obfuscated volume numbers, as prices decrease either when supply increases, or demand decreases, or both. So seafood exports out of Hunchun, China basically doubled from 2016 to 2017, year over year.
There’s no mention in the article as to what might have caused a doubling in exports out of Hunchun. That’s an example of a propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
The author used “ROSE 89%” because it’s softer than “increased”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black Sun cult that has run things in all the nations, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
In August 2017, scmp.com truthfully said “All you need to know about China’s sanctions on North Korea”.
They’re a State propaganda organ, telling you quite clearly What To Think. The article says: “The combined value of North Korea’s 2016 exports to China of coal, iron ore, lead ore and seafood – all of which are now banned by Beijing – was almost US$1.5 billion, or 60 per cent of its total exports.”
They combine them, and make sure you can’t get the individual numbers, specifically seafood, which, in journalistic parlance, the author has “buried” to the last, to downplay it. The author talks about value, but carefully omits volume, as the international news blackout that is in place on this subject specifically demands the downplaying or omission of volume numbers, which expose the “Poor Mother Gaia is Dying” confidence game.
In October 2017, the Korean News Digest said “Seafood exports up 10.9 percent in first three quarters of 2017”. Can you see how, under the false guise of familiarity, the headline omits the name of the nation, to make the subject virtually unsearchable.
The author uses the classic “rushing to press” ruse in which they report the year’s volume’s three months early, so that the number is smaller. Then, in January, the generational Satanist running the newsroom will say “we just ran a story on that”, and the news blackout on the subject will run on unimpeded.
The article continues “Exports of South Korean seafood rose 10.9 percent in the first nine months of 2017 from a year earlier on strong demand for dried laver and tuna, the maritime ministry said Sunday.”
Where we once again see the tirelessly-deployed “increased demand” ruse, vs. the truth, “they sold all they caught.”
There was clearly some huge positive change in the marine environment in Korea in 2017.
In October 2017, The News Now said “Seafood exports at Rs 9066 crore in first quarter”.
Can you see how, under the false guise of familiarity, the headline omits the word “India”, to make the subject virtually unsearchable? That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The international news blackout that is in place on this subject demands the downplaying, or in this case the complete omission of volume numbers, which is why the headline omits them. The headline also omits the name of the nation, to make the subject drastically less searchable, and makes only a flat statement about the value of Fish exports in India in the first quarter of 2017. Those are both examples of a propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”. The propagandist knows that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines.
The article continues: “India’s seafood exports stood at 2,51735 Metric Tonnes, valued at Rs 9066.06 crore (US$1.42 billion) in the first quarter of the current fiscal, according to the Marine Products Exports Development Authority (MPEDA). During the same period in the last fiscal it stood at 2,01223 MT, worth $1.17 billion.”
Where “exports STOOD” brazenly implies they were unchanged. The headline of the article leads with a boring, out-of-context money number, then the volume numbers are “buried” lower in the body of the article. And no percentage is provided, just the numbers. That’s careful hedging. So I had to do the math. 201223 to 251735 metric tons is a twenty five percent increase. Such volume increases usually consist of tiny margins. This is an historically-unprecedented - and completely unexplained - one year increase in volume.
In November 2017, seafoodsource.com said “India’s seafood exports up by 21 percent so far in 2017”. It’s a classic technique - publish the story in November, to pretend you are “all over what’s news”, when in fact you are publishing early to avoid having an even larger number to report as the official year’s total. This way, in December, the person running the newsroom can say “we just ran an article on that”, and the news blackout runs on uninterrupted.
The article continues: “India’s first quarter exports rose 21 percent off of increasing demand for frozen shrimp in the international market”.
The tirelessly-played “increasing demand” ruse is used, vs. the truth, “they sold all they caught.” Did you notice that they said it was shrimp demand, when the seafood export volume number is up 21 percent overall? More downplaying, more compartmentalization. Did you notice how they don’t break out the percentage of shrimp vs. overall seafood?
“Increasing demand for frozen shrimp” is a bullshit plausible-deniability excuse, put forward because the propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.In December 2017, mynewsdesk.com said “Norwegian seafood exports for 2017 exceed last year’s level by a clear margin”, and that “Norway exported 286,000 tonnes of seafood worth NOK 9 billion in November. Volume increased by 25 per cent.”
Where the headline uses the general “by a clear margin” as hedge downplaying the stunning 25% increase in volume, a specific figure “buried” down below the general headline which leads the article. The author knows that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines. That’s an example of a propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
In January 2018, NJ.com said “N.J. hatchery sets record for number of fish in 2017”. Where the terse “sets” record is general.
The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
The article continues: “The state fish hatchery in Hackettstown has been around since 1912, but it has never had a year as productive as 2017. The Hackettstown State Fish Hatchery, operated by the DEP’s Division of Fish and Wildlife, stocked more than 5 million fish in 2017. Some of the many factors that contributed to a great season included the successful collection of broodstock and their eggs, an excellent hatch and extensive on-site pond management. Modern fish diets and nutrition also played important roles, as well as ideal temperatures, sunlight and precipitation for adequate growth, proper health monitoring and avoiding the hazards of overcrowding.”
Wow. So the most fish ever, in all history, was because they collected them successfully, and because of “extensive on-site pond management”, both of which we must presume were for some reason not taking place just the year previously. Only-generally described “modern” diets and nutrition are also credited, which, once again, we’d also have to presume were for some reason not in place just the year before.
The best hatch in all history was allowed to be only “excellent” and “productive”.
Then, in journalistic parlance “buried” at the bottom of the article, we get the figures:
“In addition, some 171,788 fish of other species were raised in 2017 setting the facility’s new yearly production record at 5,082,841, far surpassing the previous high of 3,774,885 set in 2014.”
Did you notice how the author provided the numbers, but carefully hedged by omitting the far more impactful percentage increase between them? So, I had to do the math. The number of fish produced by the New Jersey state fish hatchery in Hackettstown in 2017 was the highest in history since the hatchery was built in 1912. The total was 35% above the previous record, set in 2014.
Such records are usually broken by tiny margins. Here the record is suddenly a third higher than the previous record, with no quantum change in fish management practices to attribute it to. The closest the author gets to telling the truth is “ideal temperatures, sunlight and precipitation”, although how you could claim that New Jersey experienced ideal fish raising temperatures during the third hottest year of all time is beyond me.
Actually, it’s not. The claim that 2017 was the third hottest year in all history is patently false, underscore by the data point I just illustrated.
It is over interest that the two highest production years in the facility’s history were in 2014 and 2017, during the time period I’m documenting the great positive changes occurring at every level of our reality, including at the fish hatchery in Hackettstown.
Jeff Miller, Brooklyn, New York, December 23, 2020
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
You can access these articles online at https://forum.orgones.co.uk/c/positive-changes-that-are-occurring/
