“Bishop to Bishop eight, discovered check, and, incidentally, mate.”
Sherlock Holmes, from “Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows”, written by Michele Mulroney and Kieran Mulroney, 2011
January 30, 2008 - Blue-eyed humans have a single, common ancestor
New research shows that people with blue eyes have a single, common ancestor. Scientists have tracked down a genetic mutation which took place 6,000-10,000 years ago and is the cause of the eye color of all blue-eyed humans alive on the planet today.
January 30, 2008 - ‘Blue-eyed Humans’ do not 'Have A Single, Common Ancestor
ScienceDaily has a stupid title up for a report on some new research, Blue-eyed Humans Have A Single, Common Ancestor.
September 21, 2017 - All people with blue eyes have a common ancestor
New research shows that all blue-eyed people share a common ancestor. This person lived more than 6,000 years ago and carried a genetic mutation that has now spread across the world.
The exact cause remains to be determined, but scientists do know that eye color began to change long before recorded history began.
"A confidence trick is an attempt to defraud a person or group after first gaining their trust. Confidence tricks exploit victims using their credulity, naïveté, compassion, vanity, irresponsibility, and greed. Researchers confidence tricks have been defined as “a distinctive species of fraudulent conduct … intending to further voluntary exchanges that are not mutually beneficial”, as they “benefit con operators (‘con men’) at the expense of their victims (the ‘marks’)”. - Wikipedia
A current article that I’ve appended below is headlined “The Global Trust Crisis”.
In it, we read that "the latest uprisings are calling for a fundamental change in the world’s systems of political and economic governance
Humanity is collectively calling for a fundamental change. A great, epochal positive change.
Everyone in all the nations is waking up at once, which is why the protests the article mentions are occurring regardless of national boundary.
As you read, you’ll notice that the author does what they can to hedge by carefully using the Mil-speaky “self-determination” in place of the stronger, more specific “secession”.
Everyone knows the fix is from the top, although most have not yet gotten as far as I have, re: the con artists all being genetically related to one another. They are of the race that Science has dubbed “Neanderthal”, with parchment-white skin, red hair, and blue or green or grey eyes. It’s why the ruling lineages of all the nations all have the lightest skin color.
In one article that I’ve appended below, the Neanderthal’s military invasion and subsequent colonization of Europe is described, in Mil-speak, as “a mass movement of farmers.”
Here’s some more violent spin control: “In Europe, for example, ancient DNA is identifying waves of migrations into the continent, in which groups of people serially replaced, or nearly replaced, the local population.”
Where “serially replaced” means “they killed all the men, and took all the women.” Race-based genocide by the ruling lineage, on an international scale, then to now.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why the article we’re discussing goes on to say “This work is not without controversy, especially as these replacements can be difficult to explain.”
They’re saying that it’s “difficult to explain” so they don’t have to say “they killed all the men, and took all the women.”
It’s why the article goes on to say “To his surprise, the DNA revealed that humans and Neanderthals did interbreed in their time together in Europe. Possibly even more than once. Today, surprisingly, the people carrying the most Neanderthal DNA are not in Europe but in East Asia—likely due to the patterns of ancient human migration in Eurasia in the thousands of years after Neanderthals died out. All this painted a complicated but dynamic picture of human prehistory. Since the very beginning of our species, humans have been on the move ; at times they replaced and at other times they mixed with the local population, first hominids like Neanderthals and later other humans.”
Surprise, surprise! Can you see how the invading, pillaging, raping, burning hordes of Neanderthals is redacted down to “humans on the move?” How they’ve removed their fingerprints, claiming the race “died out”, when it in fact took over?
“And later other humans” is general. As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda.
Here’s David’s picture:
What lovely blue eyes he has!
Another article below is headlined “All people with blue eyes have a common ancestor.”
It goes on to say that “This person lived more than 6,000 years ago and carried a genetic mutation that has now spread across the world.”
Can you see how it’s postured as if it were a virus of some sort, spreading on its own? Versus the truth, that it was spread via violent military takeovers in which the Neanderthal killed all the men of other races, and took all the women.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything.
"That’s why the article goes on to say “the exact cause remains to be determined, but scientists do know that eye color began to change long before recorded history began.”
“Began to change”, again, as if by magic. No mention of the color change being implemented via violent military conquest.
The conspirators I’m taking to task all share a common bloodline, and a common religion, the latter which has featured blood sacrifice and cannibalism all the way back to the dawn of written history, and before.
May 16, 2009 - How Neanderthals met a grisly fate: devoured by humans
December 30, 2016 - The caves that prove Neanderthals were cannibals
March 29, 2019 - Neanderthals Resorted to Cannibalism in the Face of Climate Change
March 31, 2019 - Neanderthal cannibalism is less surprising than you think
Climate change, ah, mirth, is there anything it can’t do? Here, it takes the Neanderthal off the hook for the most heinous crime known to man.
One of the articles I’ve appended below says the Neanderthal “took care of the bodies of the deceased and held burial rituals”, then, a line later, “But there is a growing body of proof that they also ate their dead.”
The truth is, they buried their own race in pot graves, with their knees up. They buried the other races they ate in mass graves. In the article, the ruse “ate their dead” implies they waited until a Neanderthal died, and then ate them. Versus the truth, that they kept other races captive to sacrifice and eat.
That truth twisted by the Satanic inversion in their controlled press: "How Neanderthals met a grisly fate: devoured by humans"
That’s from 2008, and the propaganda’s since been forced to shift in the face of new evidence. By 2016, the ruse has been softened a bit, claiming the Neanderthal was “driven to extinction by smarter modern humans”. When in fact the more brilliant, more ruthless Neanderthal took over every nation on Earth, killing all the non-Neanderthal men, and taking all the women.
What you are supposed to think they looked like:
What they in actuality look like:
He’s dressed all proper, and has a lot of money, and keeps his human sacrifice and his cannibalism and his blood drinking on the way down low.
We’re going to have to come to terms with our history, and who is currently ruling us, to move forward in a healthy way from here.
The great news is that, once you understand the misdirection behind a confidence game or “magic trick”, you can never be fooled in that same way again.
So the game is over for them, now.
Jeff Miller, Brooklyn, New York, January 28, 2020
If you’d like to be added to the mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
January 30, 2008 - Blue-eyed humans have a single, common ancestor
New research shows that people with blue eyes have a single, common ancestor. Scientists have tracked down a genetic mutation which took place 6,000-10,000 years ago and is the cause of the eye color of all blue-eyed humans alive on the planet today.
January 30, 2008 - ‘Blue-eyed Humans’ do not ‘Have A Single, Common Ancestor’
ScienceDaily has a stupid title up for a report on some new research, Blue-eyed Humans Have A Single, Common Ancestor.
December 30, 2016 - The caves that prove Neanderthals were cannibals
The bones in Goyet date from when Neanderthals were nearing the end of their time on earth before being replaced by Homo sapiens, with whom they also interbred.
Once regarded as primitive cavemen driven to extinction by smarter modern humans, studies have found that Neanderthals were actually sophisticated beings who took care of the bodies of the deceased and held burial rituals.
But there is a growing body of proof that they also ate their dead.
September 21, 2017 - All people with blue eyes have a common ancestor
New research shows that all blue-eyed people share a common ancestor.
March 14, 2018 - Ancient DNA Is Rewriting Human (and Neanderthal) History
The genomes of the long dead are turning up all sorts of unexpected and controversial findings.
Geneticist David Reich used to study the living, but now he studies the dead.
The precipitating event came in the form of 40,000-year-old Neanderthal bones found in a Croatian cave. So well-preserved were the bones that they yielded enough DNA for sequencing, and it became Reich’s job in 2007 to analyze the DNA for signs that Neanderthals interbred with humans— a idea he was “deeply suspicious” of at the time.
(Blocking the inquiry, every step. - ed)
To his surprise, the DNA revealed that humans and Neanderthals did interbreed in their time together in Europe. Possibly even more than once. Today, surprisingly , the people carrying the most Neanderthal DNA are not in Europe but in East Asia—likely due to the patterns of ancient human migration in Eurasia in the thousands of years after Neanderthals died out. All this painted a complicated but dynamic picture of human prehistory. Since the very beginning of our species, humans have been on the move; at times they replaced and at other times they mixed with the local population, first hominids like Neanderthals and later other humans .
Reich has since converted his lab at Harvard Medical School into a “factory” for studying ancient DNA. His new book, Who We Are and How We Got Here, charts the myriad ways the study of ancient DNA is lobbing bombs into the halls of established wisdom. In Europe, for example, ancient DNA is identifying waves of migrations into the continent, in which groups of people serially replaced, or nearly replaced, the local population.
(Massed armies of Neadnerthals described in Mil-speak as “groups of people”. - ed)
This work is not without controversy, especially as these replacements can be difficult to explain .
(Killing all the men and taking all the women described in Mil-speak as “replacements” which can be “difficult to explain.” - ed)
Reich once had German collaborators drop out of a study when the initial findings seemed to mirror too closely Nazi propaganda about the Aryan race. We discuss this and other aspects of his work below. Our conversation has been condensed and edited for clarity.
Sarah Zhang: You recently published two papers in which you analyzed over 600 genomes from ancient Europeans. In your book, you write you wanted to “build an American-style genomes factory” and “make ancient DNA industrial”? What does an ancient genome factory look like?
David Reich: What we do in our laboratory is we’ve really focused on trying to make data production efficient. We usually have several people working in parallel in a clean room on turning bones or teeth into powder. The powders are dissolved in a watery solution and the DNA is released and those are turned into a sequenceable form. That’s another step we now do on a robot, which processes 96 samples at once over a period of two days and turns them into sequenceable form. We’re constantly trying to find ways to reduce costs at every stage, so that we can reduce the amount of time it takes to process a sample.
Zhang: How much does it cost to process an ancient DNA sample right now?
Reich: In our hands, a successful sample costs less than $200. That’s only two or three times more than processing them on a present-day person. And maybe about one-third to one half of the samples we screen are successful at this point.
Zhang: Scientists recently reconstructed the face of Cheddar Man, a 10,000-year-old complete skeleton found in Britain. It became a bit of a story because they showed Cheddar Man had dark skin and blue eyes based on his DNA. Why is it that Cheddar Man looks so different from modern Europeans?
Reich: In Europe where we have the best data currently—although that will change over the coming years—we know a lot about how people have migrated. We know of multiple layers of population replacement over the last 50,000 years. Between 41,000 and 39,000 years ago in western Europe, the Neanderthals were replaced by modern human populations. The first modern human samples we have in Europe are about 40,000 years old and are genetically not at all related to present-day Europeans. They seem to be from extinct, dead-end groups .
(Non-Neanderthal races took control of Europe 39-41,000 years ago. The Neanderthal came back and got them, later, which is why they are, in Mil-speak, generally referred to as “extinct, dead-end groups .” - ed)
After that, you see for the first time people related to later European hunter-gatherers who have contributed a little bit to present-day Europeans. That happens beginning 35,000 to 37,000 years ago. Then the ice sheets descend across northern Europe and a lot of these populations are chased into these refuges in the southern peninsulas of Europe.
(The Neanderthal got the non-Neanderthal pushed out to the perimeter, with the author using the Mil-speak “refuges”, a la the Reservations that the white man created as refuges for the red-skinned, brown eyed, non-Neanderthal “Indians”. The ruse is “chased by glaciers”, when the truth is “driven out by Neanderthals.” - ed)
After the Ice Age, there’s a repeopling of northern Europe from the southwest, probably from Spain, and then also from the southeast, probably from Greece and maybe even from Anatolia, Turkey.
(After the Ice Age, the neutral, vague “repeopling” of Europe is a soft cover word for “Neanderthal military invasion.” - ed)
Again, after 9,000 years ago, there’s a mass movement of farmers into the region which almost completely replaces the hunter-gatherers with a small amount of mixture.
(The neutral, vague " mass movement of farmers " a soft, general cover for “Neanderthal military invasion.” The Neanderthal were the first to domesticate grains, up in the Caucasus, from whence we get the word “Caucasian”. - ed)
And then again, after 5,000 years ago, there’s this mass movement at the beginning of the Bronze Age of people from the steppe , who also probably bring these languages that are spoken by the great majority of Europeans today.
The neutral, vague “mass movement” a soft, general cover for “Neanderthal military invasion.” - ed)
January 22, 2018 - Davos 2018: Edelman barometer reveals record drop in trust
September 26, 2019 - Americans’ Trust in Mass Media Edges Down to 41%
January 22, 2020 - The Global Trust Crisis
World leaders at venues like Davos need to start taking the public’s declining faith in institutions seriously—or face more upheaval to come.
As the world’s political and business elites ruminate on world affairs at the Swiss ski resort of Davos, this year they must contend with grave public discontent with the global system. In recent months, protests have multiplied across the globe: self-determination riots in Catalonia and Hong Kong; rebellions fueled by inequality and corruption in Algeria, Chile, Ecuador, Egypt, and Sudan, to name just a few; and the climate-focused strikes around the world led by the activist Greta Thunberg.
Unlike previous waves of protests such as the Arab Spring, which sought regime change as a central objective, the latest uprisings are calling for a fundamental change in the world’s systems of political and economic governance . Unless the leaders convening at Davos can formulate far-reaching reforms, the continued spread of populism, growing anti-capitalist sentiment, more trade wars, and many other dislocations are likely.
