Bohitree sends a lot of good stuff to me in email that he forgets to post or chooses not to post. We’re all naturally skeptical and this is an integral part of personal discernment. He’s been posting about undeniable, personal interference by the sewer rat agencies and as an internet security professional he’s got enough street credibility to silence a couple of idle deniers who were explaining all this away with tecno-mummery, here in recent years.
A casual, confident denier has more social force than an authoritative witness because it’s human nature, requiring next to no enforcement, to deny and forget about unpleasant realities. The deck is stacked solidly in denial’s favor. Those deniers graciously agreed to stop that activity long before Azti set up this sabotage forum subheading.
Most of what he emails me is very substantive and empowering material for posting, even though it’s not up to his standard of prosecutable evidence. I’m sure he won’t mind if I post our typical conversation of this morning:
Fun stuff Don…
Have you noticed how they like to give you ‘messages’ or do things like they want you to realize they can do certain things, or have the capability to do it? I am assuming they think this kind of thing scares people? It used to scare me back when I first started, now I think it’s more of a sign of desperation because if they could do more – they would.
A few days ago someone tossed gay looking pink mens boxer briefs in the cart on my Amazon account. Pretty funny. Either someone inside there, or someone with access to my PW for it. In all fairness, I use a pretty easy password at Amazon because I enter it on SmartTV’s to get movies. If that password was compromised I would say it was compromised because of insecure password storage or encryption on one of the streaming devices we use (Roku, Tivo or SmartTV)
This is similar to the subtle harassment on Facebook – disappearing posts, account modifications, etc. My PW on FB is very complex, and changes often so likely an inside job.
Thanks for sharing all that, *****.
I think many of our readers don’t need evidence to convince them that this problem exists; they need evidence to encourage them to accept (and act on) what they already suspect, usually from personal experience.
On top of it all an another elephant in the room is the new, popular assumption that there’s always an army of sociopaths with computer skills who lie in wait to ‘steal identities,’ ‘steal credit cards,’ alter personal accounts, etc. This is based on the queer modern belief that most people are criminals and that’s never been true. Anyone who goes to third world places gets an easy overview of the vey low percentage of people who are actually inclined to exploit others. It varies a bit from place to place and according to circumstances and cultural attributes, of course. When a society breaks down during a plague or due to corporate drug campaigns crime increases, also when there’s a famine, for instance. In Belize the national murder rate hovers just above zero but anything that’s not locked up will disappear. When I was stranded on the Yucatan coast in 1995 I spent some time with people in a poor coastal village and there was only one criminal; a petty thief. He was the spoiled, adult son of the only family of modest means. In Namibia we were constantly swarmed by aggressive beggars and in Uganda I never encountered a beggar. In Western Samoa personal theft is a somewhat honored practice but easy to prevent. Girls younger than adolescent are safe at night, alone in public but unaccompanied teens and women aren’t. None of that approaches the vast scale of internet sabotage campaign that’s being conducted by the sewer rat agencies against the population. Why not call it what it is?
In developed countries, some areas have more criminality and self-seeking. There’s more con artists in Florida and Southern California than anywhere else on the continent, for instance. In Des Moines there’s no rush hour traffic because most people are very polite, cooperative and patient and a lot of people don’t lock their doors where we live. Everyone who’s fairly balanced adopts a prudent level of personal security but the governments in some countries, certainly including ours, have been fully taken over by the criminal element and that’s a much bigger problem than neighborhood thuggery. How is it not the direct source of most of this sabotage to the right of free expression on the internet?
Maybe you are conditioned to assume there’s more criminality on account of your work, protecting organizations from corporate espionage. That puts you in the path of more criminals than I’d ever encounter, aside from this constant interference by gov’t felons and their MKids. Cops are also challenged that way. I only post about the more obvious boilerplating, overt surveillance, federal theft, etc., but there’s actually more of it happening to Carol and I, as well as to you.
It’s a comfort to know, as you say, that the boilerplating and sabotage shows us, at least, that they’re just not able to really hurt us, right now. The tiny percentage of people who aren’t frightened away from doing good work when they encounter the open tyranny of parasites have always been my target audience and since these, too, are usually the intended victims of agency intimidation they’re usually happy to read about some confirming experiences in our reports. It empowers them to do more to expose and destroy tyranny. That’s mainly why I encourage people to post their reports in the sabotage subheading.
Western Union and Moneygram have typically stolen money from me at key times–several thousand dollars. That’s done at management level and not by intruders. When Yahoo banned me from posting on any of their forums in May 2002, right after I posted simple instructions for neutralizing the then-new death towers it was also a corporate move. All of this indicates a much bigger problem than hacking. Azti puts a lot of protection around EW so when there’s interference it’s very obvious, so is very easy for even Pajama People to accept.
I don’t even use Moneygram any more. I only use those because I won’t use banks. A Social Security Account is required to have a bank account (and to vote, have a driver license, get insurance, etc) and I paid off outstanding debts and closed my account in 1995. As I mentioned in a post, this theft and sabotage is just the cost of doing business in a police state so we don’t get too upset by it. To me, it’s like paying ‘insurance’ to the Mafia. At least the Mafia understand (more than the feds) that, ‘You can sheer a sheep many times but skin it only once.’ We’re already publicly committed to destroying tyranny and we’re making progress so we have to expect some reprisals. I know, beyond a doubt, that we’re hurting this devouring monster worse than they’re hurting us and so are you.
Carol and I never use complicated passwords because (1) the sh!+rats read keystrokes; (2) the army of sociopaths are most likely directed MKids or paid employees of the shitrat agencies. You mentioned elsewhere (in a post, I hope) that the sewer rats can turn on a computer remotely and scour it. The timing of their interference over the years has been a good confirmation of the fact that they have to be surreptitious enough not to alarm the Pajama People, whom they’re also afraid of.
In addition, of course, every time many of us get a hint of interference we send a strong boost of heart energy to the source. This has a healing effect on recipients who are not parasites; a sometimes fatal one on recipients whose heart centers are shriveled. It’s always effective because no predator has good protection at that level of existence. That’s probably why they spend so much effort on hiding from our psychics. The corporate world order never had any use for balanced people so all of the interference is done by corrupted individuals, from the bottom of their corporate dungheap right to the top.
Dooney’s trained hundreds of targeted individuals over the years to do hit back effectively. Sometimes it looks to us like they hate her worst of all donebydooney.com
~Don