Well, I’m more than happy to say that going back to my first posts in this series of articles, from July of 2013, has already started to bear a lot of fruit.
My Cod article had two line items in it earlier today. Now it comprises the article you see below.
Propaganda has effectiveness when those consuming it don’t have a bigger picture to compare it to.
The credulity of a large subset of the populace is boundless, and their critical thinking non-existent. If you couple that with the fact that they’ll grasp virtually any straw to remain off the hook of personal responsibility, you’ll understand how the few have controlled the many, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
However, articles such as these, while boring and repetitive, are also basically irrefutable. I’m presenting basic facts about, in this case, cod, and the language used in the controlled press to describe those cod.
It’s only a matter of time until the great Confidence game that’s been played upon humanity for literally Millennia will collapse.
I don’t think that it will be long, now.
And I’d ask the reader to remember that, when Con’s collapse, they do so in a rush, like a house of cards.
COD
Great positive changes are underway at every level of our reality. They began in earnest in 2012, and have been increasing in speed and magnitude. I began writing this series of articles on the subject, entitled “Positive Changes That Are Occurring”, in July of 2013.
These historically-unprecedented positive changes are being driven by many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices based on the work of Wilhelm Reich and Karl Hans Welz.
Since Don Croft first fabricated tactical Orgonite in 2000, its widespread, ongoing and ever-increasing distribution has been unknitting and transforming the ancient Death energy matrix built and expanded by our dark masters, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. And, as a result, the Ether is returning to its natural state of health and vitality.
One of those changes is that cod are increasing exponentially in number and size regardless of geography.
That’s because the size, fertility and longevity of any organism vary directly with the health of its etheric environment.
In 1992, an article I can no longer locate said “Forget about the cod shortage; within a few years, the Norwegian quota will be 250,000 tons – and by the end of the decade, it should reach 350,000.
Well, if that’s true, then why does an NBC News article from 2004 read “WWF, Worldwide Fund for Nature: “World’s Cod Stocks Could Be Gone By 2020, Group Warns”?”
NBC News and the Orwellianly-named “World Wildlife Fund” and “Worldwide Fund for Nature” are organs of the State, using conscious deception while maintaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty. I’ve exposed their duplicity by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
For any lingering Coincidence theorists in the readership squirming that my fact checking is inadequate, I must reference a Phys.org article from just three years later, in October 2007, which is headlined “British Cod Stocks Rebounding”. In it, we learn “Cod fish numbers remain stable in the south and have increased in the central to western parts of the North Sea”.
Where the propagandist from Phys.org did what little they could to hedge by implying that cod weren’t booming and burgeoning across the North Sea, but rather only in selected areas. However, cod populations increasing by some unspecified amount in the central to western parts of the North Sea directly refutes the WWF and the Worldwide Fund for Nature’s false claims in 2004 that the world’s cod stocks could be gone by 2020.
The proof that the “remain stable’ and “increase” slicing and dicing is bullshit is that there’s no data in the article to back up those general assertions.
[image]
(Atlantic cod off New England)
In November 1999, the Hartford Courant said “A year ago, the fishermen working in the Gulf of Maine and their regulators seemed to be looking at different oceans. Federal biologists, armed with evidence that the gulf’s cod population was collapsing after years of overfishing, called for a drastic cut in fishing in the gulf, which extends from Cape Cod to Canada. Angry fishermen cited only what they saw in their nets and said cod stocks were in the midst of a strong recovery. The gulf was so full of cod, the fishermen said, that even the lobster traps were full of the fish.”
The reason the “regulators” described by the Hartford Courant are seeing a different reality is that they are all bloodline-linked generational Satanists, working a Confidence game on the wider fishing population.
The article goes on to say “The report calls for a 58 percent cut in the Gulf of Maine cod mortality and recommends draconian measures to save the stock, including cutting by 50 percent the number of days fishermen are allowed to work the gulf. Other alternatives would close vast areas of the gulf to fishing.”
“The regulators” are using conscious deception while maintaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty to claim that Cod stocks booming to unprecedented levels are not, in fact doing so.
If British cod stocks are, in fact, rebounding, albeit by some unspecified amount, as noted by phys.org in October 2007, why is a Science Magazine article from just a year later, in November 2018, headlined “No recovery for Atlantic Cod population”?
Cod populations increasing by some unspecified amount in the central to western parts of the North Sea in October 2007 directly refutes Science Magazine’s false claim from November 2018 that there has been no recovery in the Atlantic cod population.
Science Magazine is an organ of the State, using conscious deception while maintaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty. I’ve exposed their duplicity by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In September 2008, Game and Fishing Magazine narrowed its eyes and asked suspiciously “Are Codfish Stocks on the Rebound?”. The propagandist knows that, sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and also that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw to remain off the hook of personal responsibility. The Coincidence theorist and the NPR addict will chirp “no!”, and turn the page, and miss the next line, which reads “Garden State bottom bouncers are seeing more cod numbers than in recent memory.”
Where the author bravely hedged by saying “more cod numbers” to give the subconscious of the Coincidence theorist the green light to say “oh, you can make those cod numbers say anything!” The factual reality of more cod than ever, in all history is hedged back to “more cod numbers in recent memory”.
If cod stocks off New Jersey were increasing in September 2008, even albeit by some unspecified amount, that directly refutes Science Magazine’s false claim from November 2018 that there has been no recovery in the Atlantic cod population.
In July 2009, the Fish Site said “North Sea Cod Stocks See Big Improvement”.
Can you see how “cod stocks see big improvement” is general? As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda. Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, this hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the scope of the positive change I’m documenting here.
Cod populations increasing by some unspecified amount in North Sea in July 2009 directly refutes Science Magazine’s false claim from November 2008 that there has been no recovery in the Atlantic cod population. It also directly refutes directly refutes the WWF and the Worldwide Fund for Nature’s false claims in 2004 that the world’s cod stocks could be gone by 2020.
I have once again exposed the duplicity of Science Magazine, the World Wildife Fund and the Worldwide Fund for Nature by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
The article continues: “New data to be released by ICES, the independent international scientific body, will reveal that numbers of cod in the North Sea sufficiently mature to reproduce are now 40 per cent higher than their average since the turn of the 21st century.”
Can you see how they compared the increase to the long term average, versus the previous year’s stock? They’re trying to obfuscate any accurate insight into the magnitude of the positive change that is taking place.
The article continues: “As an industry, we know that there’s no room for complacency. There have been some good years for spawning cod which, coupled with industry initiatives, show how stocks can rebound. We have seen a similar situation occur with cod stock recovery in the Grand Banks of Newfoundland where there are now 100,000 tonnes of spawning stock according to Canadian fisheries scientists.”
Cod populations increasing by some unspecified amount in the Grand Banks of Newfoundland in July 2009 directly refutes the WWF and the Worldwide Fund for Nature’s false claims in 2004 that the world’s cod stocks could be gone by 2020.
I have once again exposed the duplicity of the World Wildlife Fund and the Worldwide Fund for Nature by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In September 2010, CBC Canada said “Grand Banks cod stocks grow 69% since 2007”.
Cod stocks increasing by 69% in the Grand Banks of Newfoundland from 2007 to 2010 directly refutes Science Magazine’s false claim from November 2008 that there has been no recovery in the Atlantic cod population. It also directly refutes directly refutes the WWF and the Worldwide Fund for Nature’s false claims in 2004 that the world’s cod stocks could be gone by 2020.
I have once again exposed the duplicity of Science Magazine, the World Wildlife Fund and the Worldwide Fund for Nature by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In 2011, after three straight years of exponential growth in the cod population of the Grand Banks, an article I can no longer locate said “Grand Banks Cod Stocks Rebound After Thirty Years”.
Where “after thirty years” plays the ruse that cod numbers have been increasing slowly over decades, versus increasing suddenly and explosively in the three years from 2007 to 2010;
However, even this threadbare propaganda from 2011 documents an unspecified “rebound” in the cod population of the Grand Banks which directly refutes the WWF and the Worldwide Fund for Nature’s false claims in 2004 that the world’s cod stocks could be gone by 2020.
I have once again exposed the duplicity of the World Wildlife Fund and the Worldwide Fund for Nature by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In 2011, 12 years after the Hartford Courant documented that angry fishermen said cod stocks were in the midst of a strong recovery in the gulf of Maine, and that the gulf was so full of cod, that even the lobster traps were full of the fish, fisheries.noaa.gov said “The NOAA analysis, released last month, asserted that even if all fishing of Gulf of Maine cod was prohibited, it would be unlikely that the stock would be rebuilt by 2018, some four years after NOAA had expected cod to rebound to healthy amounts.”
The folks in charge are not your friends, and are lying to you about basically everything, including cod stocks in the Gulf of Maine.
[image]
Northern Cod)
A metronews.ca article from Canada from 2013 said “Cod population rebounding”.
The article goes on to say “The Atlantic cod is making a comeback off the coast of Nova Scotia. A new study has found that groundfish such as cod, pollock and haddock on the Eastern Scotian Shelf are showing promising signs of recovery since their dramatic collapse two decades ago, said Kenneth Frank of the Bedford Institute of Oceanography.
‘It was felt that those stocks and the food chains supporting it might never recover, so we’re happy to report that we’re beginning to see the initial signs of recovery of this ecosystem,” said Frank, lead author of the study’.”
There are no specific facts in the article, only hedging generalities. The “promising signs” spoken of in the first paragraph are walked back to merely “initial signs” by the Illuminist talking-head shill quoted in the mainstream news article.
There’s no mention of what is causing the cod to come back, or recover. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
In April 2013, 12 years after the Hartford Courant documented that angry fishermen said cod stocks were in the midst of a strong recovery in the gulf of Maine, and that the gulf was so full of cod, that even the lobster traps were full of the fish, and three years after cod stocks in the Grand Banks of Newfoundland increased 69% from 2007 to 2010, the journal Science said “Study: Cod stocks may never rebound.”
I’ve once again exposed Science by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In April 2013, the Boston Globe said “New England Fishermen Rally For Relief From Cuts”.
The story goes on to say “New England fishermen and their political allies rallied at a Boston fish pier Monday to make an urgent call for relief from deep and imminent cuts to their catch limits.”
Can you see how the author didn’t elaborate as to the size of the cuts, or the reason for the cuts, or what type of cuts we’re even talking about? Those are successive examples of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
In May 2013, the U.K.’s Daily Mail said “I caught the world’s biggest-ever cod! German angler smashes world record for endangered fish by landing 103lbs-specimen 5lbs heavier than the last”.
[image]
(Michael Eisele with the world record cod, off Norway, 2013)
Where the author used the lurid-but-general “smashes world record” and the also-general “5lbs heavier” in place of the far more impactful percentage increase between the records. As a bonus, the headline also omits that the previous record had been set 44 years previously.
So I had to do the math to learn that the world record cod, from 2013, weighed 103 pounds, and was 5% larger than the 98-pound record holder from 1969. Such records are usually broken by tiny margins. Here, the record stood unbroken for decades, and then was suddenly broken by a very large margin.
That’s because the size, fertility and longevity of any organism vary directly with the health of its etheric environment.
In October 2015, 14 years after the Hartford Courant documented that angry fishermen said cod stocks were in the midst of a strong recovery in the gulf of Maine, and that the gulf was so full of cod, that even the lobster traps were full of the fish, and five years after cod stocks in the Grand Banks of Newfoundland increased 69% from 2007 to 2010, National Geographic widened its eyes to simulate honesty and said “Warm Water May Spell the End of New England’s Iconic Cod”.
[image]
(Cod stocks off Newfoundland, 2018)
Northern cod’s spawning stock biomass — fish that can reproduce — increased 4% off the coast of Newfoundland from 2017 to 2018.
Cod numbers in Iceland in 2018 were the highest in history.
Skrei Cod exports from Norway increased 27% from 2018 to 2019.
In December 2018, opb.org said “West Coast Fishery Rebounds After Years Of Conservation Efforts”.
Can you see how they’re playing that it was a slow, steady recovery, over time, versus a sudden, explosive increase in fish populations?
[image]
West coast ground fish trawler, 2018)
The article goes on to say “Federal fishery managers are increasing the catch limits for several West Coast species that were overfished and severely restricted for years. Surveys show depleted populations of yellow eye and bocaccio rockfish, cow cod and ocean perch — all classified as groundfish — are rebounding decades ahead of schedule. As a result, the National Marine Fisheries Service plans to double the catch limits for these fish starting Jan. 1.”
Jeff Miller, Pittsburgh, PA, September 10, 2021
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
You can access these articles online at Positive Changes That Are Occurring - Orgones Discussion Forums
