Complete U.K. Record Common Carp Data back to 1902 - Discovered Check, and, Incidentally, Mate

"My name is Sherlock Holmes. It is my business to know what other people do not know.”

― From “The Adventure of the Blue Carbuncle”, by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, 1892

This is the first-ever data analysis of fish records back to when records began to be kept. And you’ll see why the folks in charge have made such an assiduous effort to obfuscate such records, going back into history.

THE DATA

From 1902 to 2022, the British record common carp increased in size by 329%, from 17 pounds, 8 ounces to 75 pounds, 2 ounces. That’s an average annual increase in size of 2.7% per year over each of those 120 years.

From 1902 to 1916, the British record common carp increased in size by 15.4%, from 17 pounds, 8 ounces to 20 pounds, 3 ounces. That’s an average annual increase in size of 1.1% per year over each of those fourteen years.

From 1916 to 1926, the British record common carp increased in size by 7.1%, from 20 pounds, 3 ounces to 21 pounds, 10 ounces. That’s an average annual increase in size of .71% per year over each of those ten years.

The growth rate of the British record common carp is decreasing, going forward in time, as it should, according to the scientific Orthodoxy which holds that organisms increase by ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size.

From 1926 to 1930, the British record common carp increased in size by 20%, from 21 pounds, 10 ounces to 26 pounds. That’s an average annual increase in size of 2.5% per year over each of those 4 years.

Wait, what? The 2.5% average annual increase in size of the British record common carp from 1926 to 1930 is 252% greater than the .71% average annual increase documented in the species there from 1916 to 1926.

The growth rate of the common carp in Britain is increasing exponentially, going forward in time. That’s not scientifically possible, at least according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms grow in ever-smaller increments to a genetically programmed maximum size, and that “there’s no such thing as the ether”.

They’re desperate to keep you from recognizing that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.

From 1930 to 1951, the British record common carp increased in size by 20%, from 26 pounds to 31 pounds, 4 ounces. That’s an average annual increase in size of .95% per year over each of those twenty-one years.

This .95% average annual increase in size from 1930 to 1951 is 62% less than the 2.5% average annual increase in size of the British record common carp from 1926 to 1930.

Which would comfortingly support the scientific Orthodoxy -which holds that organisms increase by ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size.

However, it is, also 34% greater than the .71% average annual increase in size of the British record common carp from 1916 to 1926.

That’s not scientifically possible, at least according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms grow in ever-smaller increments to a genetically programmed maximum size, and that “there’s no such thing as the ether”.

They’re desperate to keep you from recognizing that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.

From 1951 to 1952, the British record common carp increased in size by 40.8%, from 31 pounds, 4 ounces to 44 pounds.

The 40.8% increase in size of the British record common carp from 1951 to 1952 is 4,194% greater than the .95% average annual increase in size of the species there from 1930 to 1951.

After a WWII-driven decrease in size from 1930 to 1951, the growth rate of the species has now increased hyper-exponentially, going forward in time, as the Death energy generated by the war dissipated.

That’s not scientifically possible, at least according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms grow in ever-smaller increments to a genetically programmed maximum size, and that “there’s no such thing as the ether”.

They’re desperate to keep you from recognizing that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.

From 1980 to 1995, the British record common carp increased in size by 5%, from 51 pounds, 8 ounces to 53 pounds, 15 ounces. That’s an average annual increase in size of .33% per year over each of those fifteen years.

The .33% average annual increase in size of the British record common carp from 1980 to 1995 is 45% less than the .6% average annual increase in size of the species there from 1952 to 1980.

Which is a comfort to the scientific Orthodoxy which holds that organisms increase by ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size.

However, it also shows how the growth of the species is being stunted in an ever-greater way by the increase in what we euphemistically refer to as “technology”. Radio waves poisoning the ether, microwave television signals poisoning the ether, phone and power transmission lines poisoning the ether, all with ever-greater efficacy, down through the decades.

From 1988 to 1998, the West Virginia state record common carp increased in size by 13.2%, from 41.5 pounds to 47 pounds.

From 1996 to 1998, the British record common carp increased in size by 21.2%, from 55 pounds, 13 ounces to 55 pounds, 6 ounces. That’s an average annual increase in size of 10.6% per year over each of those two years.

The 10.6% average annual increase in size of the British record common carp from 1996 to 1998 is 607% greater than the 1.5% increase in size of the species there in 1996.

The growth rate of the British record common carp is, still yet again, increasing hyper-exponentially, going forward in time.

That’s not scientifically possible, at least according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms grow in ever-smaller increments to a genetically programmed maximum size, and that “there’s no such thing as the ether”.

They’re desperate to keep you from recognizing that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.

In 1996, technology is not yet wireless, not blasting directly through the air, though the ether, and the positive upward pressure increasing the growth rate of the common carp in Britain cannot, at this moment, be held back.

From 1998 to 2001, the British record common carp increased in size by 5.4%, from 56 pounds, 6 ounces to 59 pounds, 7 ounces. That’s an average annual increase in size of 1.8% per year over each of those three years.

The 1.8% average annual increase in size of the British record common carp from 1998 to 2001 is 83% less than the 10.6% average annual increase in size documented in the species there from 1996 to 1998.

This is a small comfort to the scientific Orthodoxy which holds that organisms increase in ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size.

It also shows that, when the literal forest of what we euphemistically call “wireless communications infrastructure” was thrown up suddenly virtually overnight in all the nations in the late 1990’s, it drastically slowed, but did not stop the increase in size of the species to historically unprecedented levels.

In 2001, the British record common carp increased in size by .5%, from 59 pounds, 7 ounces to 59 pounds, 12 ounces.

In 2001, in the second record of the year, the British record common carp increased in size by 2.8%, from 59 pounds, 7 ounces to 61 pounds, 2 ounces.

The 2.8% increase in size of the British record common carp in 2001 is 56% greater than the 1.8% average annual increase in size of the species there from 1998 to 2001.

The see-saw battle continues. Don Croft invented simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices in 2000. Here, in 2001, the game shifts back to the positive, and the growth rate of the common carp in the U.K. is, still yet again increasing, going forward in time.

And the two records in one year is more than notable.

From 2001 to 2002, the British record common carp increased in size by .5%, from 61 pounds, 2 ounces to 61 pounds, 7 ounces.

The .5% increase in size of the common carp in the U.K. from 2001 to 2002 is 82% less than the 2.8% increase in size of the species there in 2001.

The see-saw battle continues. The records keep coming, year after year, when, back in the day, there were decades between records. However, here we see wireless technology drastically curtailing the size increase here in the early 2000’s.

From 2002 to 2004, the British record common carp increased in size by 4.6%, from 61 pounds, 7 ounces to 64 pounds, 5 ounces. That’s an average annual increase in size of 2.3% per year over each of those two years.

The 2.3% average annual increase in size of the common carp in the U.K. from 2002 to 2004 is 359% greater than the .5% increase in size of the species there from 2001 to 2002.

The growth rate of the common carp in the U.K. is, still yet again, increasing exponentially, going forward in time. That’s not scientifically possible, at least according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms grow in ever-smaller increments to a genetically programmed maximum size, and that “there’s no such thing as the ether”.

They’re desperate to keep you from recognizing that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.

The see-saw battle continues. Here, still yet again, the growth rate of the common carp in the U.K. is increasing exponentially, going forward in time. And the records keep coming.

I began gifting in 2004, and began making and distributing my own simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices in 2005.

From 2004 to 2005, the British record common carp increased in size by 2.4%, from 64 pounds, 5 ounces to 65 pounds, 14 ounces.

The 2.4% increase in size of the common carp in the U.K. from 2004 to 2005 is 4.3% greater than the 2.3% average annual increase in size of the species there from 2002 4o 2004.

The growth rate of the common carp in the U.K. is still increasing, going forward in time. That’s not scientifically possible, at least according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms grow in ever-smaller increments to a genetically programmed maximum size, and that “there’s no such thing as the ether”.

They’re desperate to keep you from recognizing that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.

Two records were set in 2008, which is, once again, more than notable.

From 2005 to 2008, the British record common carp increased in size by 2.4%, from 65 pounds, 14 ounces to 67 pounds, 8 ounces. That’s an average annual increase in size of .8% per year over each of those three years.

The 2.4% average annual increase in size of the common carp in the U.K. from 2005 to 2008 is identical to the 2.4% average annual increase in size of the common carp in the U.K from 2004 to 2005.

From 2008 to 2016, the British record common carp increased in size by .83% from 67 pounds, 8 ounces to 68 pounds, 1 ounce.

From 2016 to 2020, the U.K. record common carp increased in size by 10.4%, from 68 pounds, 1 ounce to 75 pounds, 2 ounces.

The 10.4% increase in size of the U.K. record common carp from 2016 to 2022 is 1,153% greater than the .83% increase in size of the species there from 2008 to 2016.

The growth rate of the common carp in the U.K. is increasing hyper-exponentially, going forward in time. That’s not scientifically possible, at least according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms increase in ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size, and that “there’s no such thing as the Ether”.

They’re desperate to keep you from recognizing that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism vary directly with the health of its etheric environment.

THE ARTICLES

In May 2022, wvmetronews.com said “Pennsylvania angler lands a state record fish on a miserable day”.

Where author Chris Lawrence laid down a masterful bit of what he and his colleagues refer to as “tradecraft” by omitting the name of the fish and the name of the state under the false guise of familiarity, and then, as a bonus, getting to truthfully print “Pennsylvania anger” about what is, in fact, a West Virginia state record common carp.

The article goes on to say “It turned out it officially weighed 45 pounds having lost a couple of pounds while waiting to be certified, so it missed the weight record which remains 47 pounds. However, the fish was 41.2 inches and set the new record for length. The old record of 41 inches was caught in 1988 at Stonecoal Lake.The carp initially weighed 47 pounds, which would have been a new record, but in the subsequent couple of hours between the catch and getting it certified, it lost around two pounds of weight."

Well, if that’s true, that Minck’s carp “officially weighed 45 pounds”, then why does another story say “Minick’s record fish was 41.2 inches long and weighed 45.2 pounds”?

It’s not true. Investigative journalist Chris Lawrence downgraded the fish’s weight from 45.2 pounds to 45 pounds. I have exposed his duplicity by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.

Here’s Chris Lawrence’s picture, wearing a Satanic purple shirt:

[image]

(Investigative journalist Chris Lawrence, who downgraded the fish’s weight from 45.2 pounds to 45 pounds.)

Take note of how Chris’ head is slightly off-center, so that his left eye is given prominence. That’s because, to Illuminists, the left eye is the “Eye of Horus”. It’s an insider cue that Chris is a follower of the Left-Hand path. He figured the rubes would never notice.

I’ve included his photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.

They’re all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth.

It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.

But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.

Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.

“I had it in my hands and had it down in the water. He said, ‘Hold up, hold up…you have the new state record right there in your hands. Don’t put that back in the water.’” Minick explained. The carp initially weighed 47 pounds, which would have been a new record, but in the subsequent couple of hours between the catch and getting it certified, it lost around two pounds of weight. Instead they put it in a special cradle used just for carp and kept it in the water until DNR Biologist Aaron Yeager could make the longtrip from his home in Belington to Summersville to examine the fish. It’s the second time this year Yeager has come out on his day off to certify a record fish".

Here, we have perhaps the clearest evidence yet of official tampering with fish records. The carp was kept in the water the whole time. The author Chris Lawrence, bravely tries to play that it was otherwise with “don’t put that back in the water”. How, pray, did the carp lose two pounds of body weight, while sitting there in a custom-made trauma-reduction sling in the water in the lake where it was caught?

It didn’t. DNR Biologist Aaron Yeager lied bald-facedly about the weight, to avoid the fish getting the new weight record.

Here’s a picture of DNR Biologist Aaron Yeager:

[image]

(DNR Biologist Aaron Yeager, who downgraded the weight of the contender for the 2022 West Virginia state record common carp by two pounds to ensure that it didn’t get the new state record for weight).

I’ve included his photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.

They’re all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth.

It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.

But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.

Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.

And, now, to put the choke-hold on any lingering Coincidence theorists lingering in the readership saying “oh, but he couldn’t, he wouldn’t!”, we’re going to have to move on with additional carp records proving that the species is increasing exponentially in size and length regardless of subtype or geography.

Here’s data from another website on the West Virginia state record common carp:

"Common 1988 41 41.5 Stonecoal Lake Charles J. Cook

1998 39.3 47 Pond (Preston County) Gary Johnson"

Since we know the claimed weight of Minck’s carp was 45.2 pounds, and it is fraudulently claimed that the fish somehow “lost around two pounds of weight”, despite being kept in the water the entire time, I’m going to use 47.2 pounds as the weight of Minck’s new record holder.

For those keeping score, fish can and will lose weight after they die, but do not do so when they are moved to a fish tank, or, in extremis, kept peacefully in the lake water in which they were caught.

From 1988 to 2022, the West Virginia state record common carp increased in length by .5%, from 41 inches to 41.2 inches.

From 1998 to 2022, the largest carp ever caught in West Virginia increased in size by .4%, from 47 pounds to 47.2 pounds.

From 1988 to 1998, the West Virginia state record common carp increased in size by 13.2%, from 41.5 pounds to 47 pounds.

And, now, to put the choke-hold on any lingering Coincidence theorists lingering in the readership saying “oh, but he couldn’t, he wouldn’t!”, we’re going to have to move on with additional carp records proving that the species is increasing exponentially in size and length regardless of subtype or geography.

In May 2022, Carpquest.co.uk said “Notable Record - A 64lb 6oz carp taken from The Avenue in 2018 holds the British record. The official United States world record common carp is a 54lb 8oz fish captured in a New Jersey river system. Also, a 101-pound 6-ounce common carp holds the largest carp world record. In 2019, anglers captured it in Lake Serene, France.”

Where author Steve Holland used the singular “record” to describe three records, which, despite the fact that those records represent the largest example of the common carp ever caught, in all history, in all the world, Steve hedges back to being merely “notable”.

Did you, er, note that, despite loving him some carp like writing about them is, in fact, his job, noted carp journalist Steve Holland doesn’t make any mention of what the previous records were, or when they were set, or the margin between those records? Those are all examples of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

Well, will you look at that! I just found a story from October 2020 from carpfeed.com, which says “Giant carp over the British record banked at 75lb 2oz”.

Where the uncredited author used the general “over the British record” to obscure the margin between the old record and the new. As a propagandist, they know that, since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, the technique goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the speed and scope of the exponential increase in carp size that I’m documenting here.

For those late to the party, any time an author is uncredited, it is proof that said author is an Intelligence operative.

The story goes on to say "A carp weighing 7lb 1oz heavier than the official British record has been banked this morning [Oct 12] by England international Wayne Mansford.

The 75lb 2oz mirror was caught from Meadows Lake at Cambridgeshire’s Holme Fen Fishery and beats the current ratified record of 68lb 1oz."

Did you notice how the uncredited author made no mention of when the previous record was, or who set it? Those are examples of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

Said Intelligence Operative author used the general “weighing 7lb 1oz heavier” and “beats the current ratified record” in place of the far-more-impactful, specific percentage increase between the records that I was forced to do the math to learn. That’ another example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

We’ve also just learned that, as of May 2022, carpquest.com’s Steve Holland has omitted the current U.K. record common carp, despite the fact that he writes professionally on a website called “Carp Quest”. I have exposed his duplicity by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.

From 2018 to 2020, the U.K. record common carp increased in size by 10.4%, from 68 pounds, 1 ounce to 75 pounds, 2 ounces.

That’s an exponential increase in size over just two years. That’s not scientifically possible, at least according to the Orthodoxy which holds that organisms increase in ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size.

In November 2016, korda.co.uk said “Dean Fletcher’s British record carp is the catch of 2016!

The author of the article is uncredited. For those late to the party, any time an author is uncredited, it is proof that said author is an Intelligence Operative.

Despite the hand-waving, lurid distraction of the exclamation point, the headline is completely general, stating only that the carp is a British record.

Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, this technique goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the speed and scope of the exponential increase in size of the common carp that I’m documenting here.

“There have been some great catches, but at Korda we believe that Dean Fletchers capture of the Parrot, which beat the long-standing British record for carp, is going to take some beating! Dean, from Reading, Berkshire, was fishing his local Cranwells Lake on the Wasing Estate when he banked the huge mirror at a new high of 68lb 1oz, to beat the previous record by 9oz. The previous record had been held since 2008 by Oz Holness with Conningbrook’s famous Two Tone at 67lb 8oz, a fish which died a few years ago.”

I’m sure you noticed that the curiously-uncredited author provided the weights of the old and new record holders, but carefully hedged by omitting the far more impactful percentage increase between them, replacing it with the general “beat the previous record by 9 oz”. So, I had to do the math to learn that, from 2008 to 2016, the British record common carp increased in size by .83% from 67 pounds, 8 ounces to 68 pounds, 1 ounce.

That’s an example of a record being broken by a tiny margin, over many years. Which makes sense, given that organisms are held by Science to grow in ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size.

The 10.4% increase in size of the U.K. record common carp from 2016 to 2022 is 1,153% greater than the .83% increase in size of the species there from 2008 to 2016.

The growth rate of the common carp in the U.K. is increasing hyper-exponentially, going forward in time. That’s not scientifically possible, at least according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms increase in ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size, and that “there’s no such thing as the Ether”.

They’re desperate to keep you from recognizing that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism vary directly with the health of its etheric environment.

In April 2018, Carpology.net published “The British Record: A Timeline”.

Where the uncredited author used the false guise of familiarity to omit any mention of what sort of record they’re talking about. It’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

For those late to the party, any time an author is uncredited, it is proof that said author is an Intelligence operative.

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything.

That’s why the article goes on to say “1. 17lb 8oz, Otto Overbeck, Croxby Pond, 1902 - He landed this, the first British Record* on a fly rod. It reputedly took him over four hours to land the beast, during which time he had to take to the water up to his waist. *It is now widely accepted that George Holden caught a carp of 23lb 1oz from Broadwater Lake in 1899, but for some reason, it has never made its way onto the record lists, official or unofficial.”

Where “for some reason” is signal, in that it’s the earliest know example of fish record tampering yet identified.

It would be 1930 until a fish exceeded George Holden’s inexplicably-stripped record holder from 1899, so the Fish Feds in the U.K. got thirty years of obfuscation for their tireless efforts. But you can see how it really doesn’t change anything, in the end, and that it only gets worse for them when someone such as myself points out the Great Big Conspiracy.

“2. 20lb 3oz, John Andrews, Cheshunt Reservoir, 1916”.

From 1902 to 1916, the British record common carp increased in size by 15.4%, from 17 pounds, 8 ounces to 20 pounds, 3 ounces. That’s an average annual increase in size of 1.1% per year over each of those fourteen years.

“3. 21lb 10oz, A.E. Wyatt, Warren Pond, 1926”.

From 1916 to 1926, the British record common carp increased in size by 7.1%, from 20 pounds, 3 ounces to 21 pounds, 10 ounces. That’s an average annual increase in size of .71% per year over each of those ten years.

The growth rate of the British record common carp is decreasing, going forward in time, as it should, according to the scientific Orthodoxy which holds that organisms increase by ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size.

“4. 26lb, Albert Buckley, Mapperley Reservoir, 1930”

From 1926 to 1930, the British record common carp increased in size by 20%, from 21 pounds, 10 ounces to 26 pounds. That’s an average annual increase in size of 2.5% per year over each of those 4 years.

Wait, what? The 2.5% average annual increase in size of the British record common carp from 1926 to 1930 is 252% greater, or well more than triple the .71% average annual increase documented in the species there from 1916 to 1926.

The growth rate of the common carp in Britain is increasing exponentially, going forward in time. That’s not scientifically possible, at least according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms grow in ever-smaller increments to a genetically programmed maximum size, and that “there’s no such thing as the ether”.

They’re desperate to keep you from recognizing that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.

I surmise that the growth rate of the common carp in the U.K. began to increase exponentially after World War I ended, and the Death energy in the wider environment began to mitigate.

“5. 31lb 4oz, Bob Richards, Redmire Pool, 1951”

From 1930 to 1951, the British record common carp increased in size by 20%, from 26 pounds to 31 pounds, 4 ounces. That’s an average annual increase in size of .95% per year over each of those twenty-one years.

This .95% average annual increase in size from 1930 to 1951 is 62% less than the 2.5% average annual increase in size of the British record common carp from 1926 to 1930.

Which would comfortingly support the scientific Orthodoxy -which holds that organisms increase by ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size.

However, it is, also 34% greater than the .71% average annual increase in size of the British record common carp from 1916 to 1926. Which is not scientifically possible, at least according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms increase by ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size.

To make matters worse for the miscreants working the great Confidence game known as mean-spirited Western materialism, these fish records are also de-facto longevity records, as fish grow continuously until they die.

“6. 44lb, Richard Walker, Redmire Pool, 1952”

From 1951 to 1952, the British record common carp increased in size by 40.8%, from 31 pounds, 4 ounces to 44 pounds.

The 40.8% increase in size of the British record common carp from 1951 to 1952 is 4,194% greater than the .95% average annual increase in size of the species there from 1930 to 1951.

After a WWII-driven decrease in size from 1930 to 1951, the growth rate of the species has now increased hyper-exponentially, going forward in time, from 1951 to 1952, as the Death energy generated by the war dissipated.

That’s not scientifically possible, at least according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms grow in ever-smaller increments to a genetically programmed maximum size, and that “there’s no such thing as the ether”.

They’re desperate to keep you from recognizing that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.

“7. 51lb 8oz, Chris Yates, Redmire Pool, 1980”

From 1952 to 1980, the British record common carp increased in size by 17%, from 44 pounds to 51 pounds, 8 ounces. That’s an average annual increase in size of .6% per year over each of those twenty eight years.

That’s orders of magnitude smaller than the single-year 41% increase in size of the species there from 1951 to 1952, and it was decades upon decades between the records from 1952 to 1980. Which is a comfort to the scientific Orthodoxy which holds that organisms increase by ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size.

However it also shows how the growth of the species is being stunted in an ever-greater way by the increase in what we euphemistically refer to as “technology”. Radio waves poisoning the ether, television signals poisoning the ether, phone and power transmission lines poisoning the ether, with ever-greater efficacy, down through the decades.

“8. 53lb 15oz, Roddy Porter, Mid Northants Fishery, 1995”.

From 1980 to 1995, the British record common carp increased in size by 5%, from 51 pounds, 8 ounces to 53 pounds, 15 ounces. That’s an average annual increase in size of .33% per year over each of those fifteen years.

The .33% average annual increase in size of the British record common carp from 1980 to 1995 is 45% less than the .6% average annual increase in size of the species there from 1952 to 1980.

Which is a comfort to the scientific Orthodoxy which holds that organisms increase by ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size.

However, it also shows how the growth of the species is being stunted in an ever-greater way by the increase in what we euphemistically refer to as “technology”. Radio waves poisoning the ether, microwave television signals poisoning the ether, phone and power transmission lines poisoning the ether, all with ever-greater efficacy, down through the decades.

“9. 55lb 6oz, Alex White, Mid Northants Fishery, 1995”

In 1995, the British record common carp increased in size by 2.6% from 53 pounds, 15 ounces to 55 pounds.

The 2.6% increase in size of the British record common carp in 1995 is 687% greater than the .33% average annual increase in size of the species there from 1980 to 1995.

The growth rate of the species has once again increased hyper-exponentially, going forward in time, in 1995.

That’s not scientifically possible, at least according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms grow in ever-smaller increments to a genetically programmed maximum size, and that “there’s no such thing as the ether”.

They’re desperate to keep you from recognizing that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.

Here, in 1995, we’re on the doorstep of the great positive energetic change that would culminate in 2012. And it was at this moment that the last-ditch effort to blunt, defray and stop that transformation was being rolled out. That last-tech effort was called “Information Technology”.

“55lb 13oz, Terry Hearn, Wraysbury, 1996”

From 1995 to 1996, the British record common carp increased in size by 1.5%, from 55 pounds to 55 pounds, 13 ounces.

The 1.5% increase of the British record common carp in 1996 is 42% less than the 2.6% increase in size of the species there in 1995.

Which is a comfort to the scientific Orthodoxy which holds that organisms increase by ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size.

However, it was 28 years between the records from 1952 to 1980, then fifteen years from 1980 to 1995, and now we’ve got records in consecutive years in 1995 and 1996.

There’s obviously “upward pressure” in terms of growth rates, and that upward pressure began in earnest in 1995. From 1995 to 1996, we see the increase in growth rate almost halved as what we euphemistically refer to as “information technology came rapidly online.

“11. 56lb 6oz, Kev Cummins, Wraysbury, 1998”.

From 1996 to 1998, the British record common carp increased in size by 21.2%, from 55 pounds, 13 ounces to 55 pounds, 6 ounces. That’s an average annual increase in size of 10.6% per year over each of those two years.

The 10.6% average annual increase in size of the British record common carp from 1996 to 1998 is 607% greater than the 1.5% increase in size of the species there in 1996.

The growth rate of the British record common carp is, still yet again, increasing hyper-exponentially, going forward in time.

That’s not scientifically possible, at least according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms grow in ever-smaller increments to a genetically programmed maximum size, and that “there’s no such thing as the ether”.

They’re desperate to keep you from recognizing that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.

In 1996, technology is not yet wireless, not blasting directly through the air, though the ether, and the positive upward pressure increasing the growth rate of the common carp in Britain cannot, at this moment, be held back.

“12. 59lb 7oz, Terry Glebioska, Conningbrook, 2001”.

From 1998 to 2001, the British record common carp increased in size by 5.4%, from 56 pounds, 6 ounces to 59 pounds, 7 ounces. That’s an average annual increase in size of 1.8% per year over each of those three years.

The 1.8% average annual increase in size of the British record common carp from 1998 to 2001 is 83% less than the 10.6% average annual increase in size documented in the species there from 1996 to 1998.

This is a small comfort to the scientific Orthodoxy which holds that organisms increase in ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size.

It also shows that, when the literal forest of what we euphemistically call “wireless communications infrastructure” was thrown up suddenly virtually overnight in all the nations in the late 1990’s, it drastically slowed, but did not stop the increase in size of the species to historically unprecedented levels.

“13. 59lb 12oz, Mark Toland, Conningbrook, 2001”

In 2001, the British record common carp increased in size by .5%, from 59 pounds, 7 ounces to 59 pounds, 12 ounces.

“14. 61lb 2oz, Gary Bayes, Conningbrook, 2001”

In 2001, the British record common carp increased in size by 2.8%, from 59 pounds, 7 ounces to 61 pounds, 2 ounces.

The 2.8% increase in size of the British record common carp in 2001 is 56% greater than the 1.8% average annual increase in size of the species there from 1998 to 2001.

The see-saw battle continues. Don Croft invented simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices in 2000. Here, in 2001, the game shifts back to the positive, and the growth rate of the common carp in the U.K. is, still yet again increasing, going forward in time.

And the two records in one year is more than notable.

“15. 61lb 7oz, Lee Jackson, Conningbrook, 2002”

From 2001 to 2002, the British record common carp increased in size by .5%, from 61 pounds, 2 ounces to 61 pounds, 7 ounces.

The .5% increase in size of the common carp in the U.K. from 2001 to 2002 is 82% less than the 2.8% increase in size of the species there in 2001.

The see-saw battle continues. The records keep coming, year after year, when, back in the day, there were decades between records. However, here we see wireless technology drastically curtailing the size increase here in the early 2000’s.

“16. 64lb 5oz, Jon Pack, Conningbrook, 2004”

From 2002 to 2004, the British record common carp increased in size by 4.6%, from 61 pounds, 7 ounces to 64 pounds, 5 ounces. That’s an average annual increase in size of 2.3% per year over each of those two years.

The 2.3% average annual increase in size of the common carp in the U.K. from 2002 to 2004 is 359% greater than the .5% increase in size of the species there from 2001 to 2002.

The growth rate of the common carp in the U.K. is, still yet again, increasing exponentially, going forward in time. That’s not scientifically possible, at least according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms grow in ever-smaller increments to a genetically programmed maximum size, and that “there’s no such thing as the ether”.

They’re desperate to keep you from recognizing that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.

The see-saw battle continues. Here, still yet again, the growth rate of the common carp in the U.K. is increasing exponentially, going forward in time. And the records keep coming.

I began gifting in 2004, and began making and distributing my own simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices in 2005.

“17. 65lb 14oz, Simon Bater, Conningbrook, 2005”

From 2004 to 2005, the British record common carp increased in size by 2.4%, from 64 pounds, 5 ounces to 65 pounds, 14 ounces.

The 2.4% increase in size of the common carp in the U.K. from 2004 to 2005 is 4.3% greater than the 2.3% average annual increase in size of the species there from 2002 4o 2004.

The growth rate of the common carp in the U.K. is still increasing, going forward in time. That’s not scientifically possible, at least according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms grow in ever-smaller increments to a genetically programmed maximum size, and that “there’s no such thing as the ether”.

They’re desperate to keep you from recognizing that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.

“18. 67lb, John Bird, Conningbrook, 2008

  1. 67lb 8oz, Oz Holness, Conningbrook, 2008”

Two records were set in 2008, which is, once again, more than notable.

From 2005 to 2008, the British record common carp increased in size by 2.4%, from 65 pounds, 14 ounces to 67 pounds, 8 ounces. That’s an average annual increase in size of .8% per year over each of those three years.

The 2.4% average annual increase in size of the common carp in the U.K. from 2005 to 2008 is identical to the 2.4% average annual increase in size of the common carp in the U.K from 2004 to 2005.

“20. 68lb 1oz, Dean Fletcher, Wasing Estate, 2016”

From 2008 to 2016, the British record common carp increased in size by .83% from 67 pounds, 8 ounces to 68 pounds, 1 ounce.

The .83% average annual increase in size of the common carp in the U.K. from 2008 to 2016 is 65% lessthan the 2.4% average annual increase in size of the species there from 2004 to 2008.

The see-saw battle continues. The growth rate is once again decreasing, going forward in time.

From 2016 to 2020, the U.K. record common carp increased in size by 10.4%, from 68 pounds, 1 ounce to 75 pounds, 2 ounces.

The 10.4% increase in size of the U.K. record common carp from 2016 to 2022 is 1,153% greater than the .83% increase in size of the species there from 2008 to 2016.

The growth rate of the common carp in the U.K. is increasing hyper-exponentially, going forward in time. That’s not scientifically possible, at least according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms increase in ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size, and that “there’s no such thing as the Ether”.

They’re desperate to keep you from recognizing that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism vary directly with the health of its etheric environment.

The 10.4% average annual increase in size of the common carp in the U.K. from 2016 to 2022 is very close to the 10.6% average annual increase in size in the species there from 1996 to 1998 - and 2016 to 2022 is the last data in the set, when the increase in size should be the smallest.

Those figures are second only to the one-year, 41% increase in size of the common carp in the U.K. from 1951 to 1952.

Jeff Miller, Honolulu, HI, June 9, 2022

If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]