COTTON
Great positive changes are underway at every level of our reality. They began in earnest in 2012, and have been increasing in speed and magnitude. I began writing this series of articles, entitled “Positive Changes That Are Occurring”, in July of 2013.
These historically-unprecedented positive changes are being driven by many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices based on the work of Wilhelm Reich and Karl Hans Welz.
Since Don Croft first fabricated tactical Orgonite in 2000, its widespread, ongoing and ever-increasing distribution has been unknitting and transforming the ancient Death energy matrix built and expanded by our dark masters, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. And, as a result, the Ether is returning to its natural state of health and vitality.
One of those changes is record cotton harvests and yields, regardless of geography.
Cotton production in South Carolina increased 92% from 2016 to 2017, to the highest level in history.
Cotton production in Arkansas increased 26% from 2016 to 2017, while yield increased 8%, both to the highest level in history. This from cultivated area which increased only 16%.
2017’s cotton crops were the largest in North Dakota’s history.
In December 2017, Cotton Grower said “After Rocky Start, Arkansas Harvest Breaks Records”. It’s used to blunt any specific insight into the magnitude of the trend. The author has “compartmentalized” the phenomenon, as sixty to seventy readers only read the headlines, as the propagandist well knows.
Under the false guise of familiarity, the duplicitous author from Cotton Grower omitted the word “cotton” from the headline, to make the subject virtually unsearchable. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
“After rocky start” is also general, and does what it can to impugn the finest cotton growing season in all history.
Where “breaks records” is general.
The article continues: “Overall, the USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service forecasts Arkansas cotton yields at 1.06 million bales in November, up 220,000 bales from a year earlier. That averages to 1,162 pounds of cotton per harvested acre – 87 pounds above 2016.”
The propagandist used the general “up 220,000 bales” to avoid using a far more impactful, specific statistic. So, I had to do the math. The Arkansas cotton crop increased 26% from 2016 to 2017.
In terms of yield, the author used the general “87 pounds above” to avoid using a far more impactful, specific statistic. So, I had to do the math. It’s an historically unprecedented 8% increase in cotton yield in Arkansas.
The article continues: “ ‘We’re headed for an all-time record yield on cotton,’ said Bill Robertson, Extension cotton agronomist for the University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture. Despite the soggy start, Arkansas cotton acreage was up in 2017, Robertson said. Growers planted about 440,000 acres of upland cotton, an increase of more than 60,000 acres from 2016. The extra acreage helped boost Arkansas’ cotton harvest. Robertson said cotton also benefitted from lighter disease pressure in 2017.”
You can see how, once again, generalities are put forward, and specifics omitted, to blunt insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here. It’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”. So, I had to do the math. Area under cultivation increased 16% from 2016 to 2017.
Bill’s not technically lying. The 16% increase in area under cultivation did, indeed help “boost” Arkansas’ cotton harvest in 2017. Where Bill put the general “boost” forward to obscure the historically unprecedented 26% increase in harvest volume. Lastly, “LIGHTER disease pressure” is also general.
Neither Bill nor the author from Cotton Grower mentions that the record cotton harvest in Arkansas is part of a wider trend, which I’m documenting here. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
Here’s Bill’s picture, where he’s using a purportedly-secret Illuminist hand gesture:
(Bill Robertson, Extension cotton agronomist for the University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture)
Not all cotton agronomists are generational Satanists, of course, but rather only those who get quoted in mainstream news stories.
You can’t recognize them by their appearance, beyond their almost-continuous use of supposedly “secret” hand signs. You can only recognize them by the codified, highly-repetitive way in which they speak, and write.
They’re hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth, figuring the rubes would never notice.
You know them only-generally as “the One Percent”. They are the distinct and separate race that we know as “Neanderthal”. They’re all genetically related to one another. It’s a bloodline thing. As any middle schooler knows:
August 5, 2012 - 12 Year Old Girl Discovers All US Presidents Are Related to King John of England
They’re related through the maternal bloodline.
Here’s what you’re supposed to think a Neanderthal looks like:
While this is what a Neanderthal actually looks like.
(King John I of England, the guy all the US Presidents are related to through their maternal bloodlines)
Apr 17, 2001 — Research leader Dr Rosalind Harding said: ‘It is certainly possible that red hair comes from the Neanderthals.’
2020 - “ScotlandsDNA believes that everyone who carries one of 3 variants of the red-hair gene is a direct descendant of the first redhead ever to have it – two variants originating in West Asia around 70,000 years ago, and a younger variant originating in Europe around 30,000 years ago.”
January 31, 2008 - Blue-eyed humans have a single, common ancestor
It’s how the few have controlled the many, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
It’s why the ruling bloodlines of all the nations have the lightest skin.
We’re obviously going to have to recognize and come to terms with this if we’re going to make progress as a species. But they say that the hardest part of a problem is realizing that you have one.
CHERRIES
In January 2018, FreshPlaza said “Argentina expects a record harvest of cherries”.
Where “RECORD harvest” is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of statistics that would provide specific insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
“EXPECTS record harvest” makes it seem ho-hum, as if the most cherries in the nation’s history was something that happened all the time, and that it was something that the professional expertise of the cherry growers in Argentina made all the difference.
The article continues: “Cherry producers estimated that the harvest this season will produce up to 5,000 exportable tons, with an extended growth in the northern region of Patagonia.”
What on God’s green, cherry-growing Earth is “AN extended growth”? It’s a bizarre, made up, bullshit plausible-deniability excuse, put forward because they don’t have anything better. But it will work just fine, because the many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
Can you see how “the NORTHERN region” compartmentalizes the phenomenon back from “across Argentina”, and is also general?
The author takes care to make no mention of the previous record, so you can’t get any idea of the magnitude of the increase. That’s an example of a propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The article continues: “The executive manager of the Argentine Chamber of Integrated Cherry Growers (CAPCI), Anibal Caminiti, said that “Argentina’s current cherry season has the prospect of achieving a record production.”
Under the false guise of “rushing to press”, they’ve put the article out before the final numbers come in, so they can say “oh, we just ran an article on that”, and allow the Illuminist talking head shill quoted in the article to put forward the fabrication that the record harvest was in doubt, was not assured.
“According to Caminiti, Argentina will achieve a record production “provided that the environmental conditions continue to be good until February, when the southernmost cherry harvest season in the country ends.”
The threat of environmental doom and gloom is a black magic spell, cast in the midst of the finest cherry growing season Argentina has ever seen. And, since most readers of the article are Believers in the false religion that is “Climate Change”, they will repeat it back in a sonorous and unemotional way, like the programmed zombies that they are.
The article concludes: “He also said that they expected an “increase in the participation of all the producing regions.”
Where it’s bravely but falsely alleged that more assiduous cherry collection will be taking place, to gather fruit no one had ever gotten to before.
It’s okay that it’s not logical, because the subconscious of most readers urgently wishes to grasp the straw, to remain off the hook of responsibility. So the propagandist and the believers in the false religion are both happy.
Here’s Anibal Caminiti, executive manager of the Argentine Chamber of Integrated Cherry Growers:
(Anibal Caminiti, executive manager of the Argentine Chamber of Integrated Cherry Growers)
I’ve included his photo so you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
Not all cherry growers are generational Satanists, of course, rather only those that rise to the top jobs, and get quoted in mainstream news articles.
You can’t recognize them by their appearance, beyond their almost-continuous use of supposedly “secret” hand signs. You can only recognize them by the codified, highly-repetitive way in which they speak, and write.
They’re hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth, figuring the rubes would never notice.
You know them only-generally as “the One Percent”. They are the distinct and separate race that we know as “Neanderthal”. They’re all genetically related to one another. It’s a bloodline thing. As any middle schooler knows:
August 5, 2012 - 12 Year Old Girl Discovers All US Presidents Are Related to King John of England
They’re related through the maternal bloodline.
Here’s what you’re supposed to think a Neanderthal looks like:
While this is what a Neanderthal actually looks like:
(King John I of England, the guy all the US Presidents are related to through their maternal bloodlines)
Apr 17, 2001 — Research leader Dr Rosalind Harding said: ‘It is certainly possible that red hair comes from the Neanderthals.’
2020 - “ScotlandsDNA believes that everyone who carries one of 3 variants of the red-hair gene is a direct descendant of the first redhead ever to have it – two variants originating in West Asia around 70,000 years ago, and a younger variant originating in Europe around 30,000 years ago.”
January 31, 2008 - Blue-eyed humans have a single, common ancestor
It’s how the few have controlled the many, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
It’s why the ruling bloodlines of all the nations have the lightest skin.
We’re obviously going to have to recognize and come to terms with this if we’re going to make progress as a species. But they say that the hardest part of a problem is realizing that you have one.
In May 2020, Fresh Plaza said “Argentinian cherry exports achieved new records”.
Where “new records” is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of statistics that would provide specific insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
As a bonus, it is alleged that Argentinian cherry exports ACHIEVED new records, as if someone put on their selling hat, and sold cherries that had sat and rotted before, or the folks picking did so somehow more assiduously, which is insane, as the amount of cherries remains the same.
The article continues: “Even though the coronavirus crisis in China took place in the middle of the cherry export season, Argentina’s season concluded with positive results as the country exported a record 5,600 tons, i.e. 20% more than in the previous year.”
The cherry harvest in Argentina increased 20% from 2019 to 2020, to the highest volume in history, and the organ of the State "Fresh Plaza” has gymnastically avoided saying that basic fact. It’s EXPORTS that are stressed…the word “harvest” is never used.
“However, the final values in China plummeted as of the third week of January due to the controls that the Asian giant imposed on all its ports of entry because of the COVID-19. According to private-sector sources, about 50 containers of cherries that arrived at this destination from January 21 had to be kept in port for several days and many of them were opened before being taken to the Chinese markets. Estimated losses would reach $ 4 million, as reflected in recent reports by the companies.”
That’s a mound of complete and utter bullshit. Cherry prices dropped catastrophically because everybody grew too many cherries, at once. In China, they used the ruse of letting them rot on the docks to keep your eyes off the trend I’m documenting here.
“The pandemic put a lower ceiling on Argentine cherry exports in the Chinese market. Chile’s offer also contributed to decrease prices.”
“The Covid did it” is pure bullshit. Cherry eating in China did not decrease based upon the house arrest its citizens have been placed under. “Chile’s offer” is a half truth, in that it’s booming and burgeoning cherry harvests in all the nations that’s driving down the price.
The article continues: “The volumes exported by Chile continue to impress. To date, Chile has exported more than 230,000 tons of cherries worldwide, although China is still their main destination. Chilean cherry exports increased by 27% over the previous year and are almost 40 times the volume of cherries that Argentina exported. The development that the Chilean fruit sector has had is an example throughout the world. Chilean cherry exports alone amount to more than $ 1.1 billion a year. It is a work and production model that Argentina should imitate in order to achieve these objectives.”
Argentinian cherry exports increased 20% from 2019 to 2020, to their highest level in history. Chilean cherry exports increased by 27% from 2019 to 2020, to the highest levels in history.
Fresh plaza doesn’t mention that these records are part of a wider trend of record stone fruit harvests regardless of geography. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
They also offer any suggestion as to what’s driving the record cherry yields in both Chile and Argentina. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
Jeff Miller, Brooklyn, New York, January 6, 2020
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
You can access these articles online at https://forum.orgones.co.uk/c/positive-changes-that-are-occurring/
