Before I begin, a warm welcome to Ethan, who brings the readership to 36.
I’m terrible at statistics, but I’m going to put together an article analyzing the growth rate of the mailing list over time. Since it’s a free mailing list, one must request to be placed on it, the list is a true demarcator of scope of awareness of and interest in the subject matter under discussion.
We may get advance notice of the Empire’s collapse as we watch the mailing list number. I keep expecting the subscriber number to increase exponentially, like in the Fibonnaci sequence.
The articles are pretty much scientific records of the subject of the article, and an editorial analysis of the historical reportage on that subject. Along with a discussion of Orgonite’s improvement of the Earth’s etheric environment as a driver of the subject of the article: dropping crime, reappearing species, increasing water clarity, etc.
Over literally Millenia, the ether has been slowly and inexorably degraded with one Death energy input after another, a “death of 1,000 cuts”, over a very long time. A human sacrifice at a key point on the Earth’s energy grid here, a graveyard, there.
Each simple, inexpensive Orgonite device undoes one, or many of those metaphorical “cuts”.
And a thumb-in-the-air estimate of how many pieces of Orgonite have been distributed since Don Croft whipped up the first batch in 2000 is certainly hundreds of thousands, perhaps into the millions. That’s a lot of Positive Orgone Radation inputs. Orgonite continuously transforms what Wilhelm Reich called “Dead Orgone Radiation”, or DOR, in POR, Positive Orgone Radiation.
That’s a lotta, lotta metaphorical “pool filters”, cleaning the dirty “water” (to continue the metaphor) that is the ether degraded by Dead Orgone Radiation.
And here, just about twenty years later, the etheric environment is already at a level of health not seen in my lifetime, or numerous lifetimes, depending on the records being broken.
DROPPING USE OF SO-CALLED “SMART” PHONES
Great positive changes are underway at every level of our reality. They began in earnest in 2012, and have been increasing in speed and magnitude. I began writing this series of articles, entitled “Positive Changes That Are Occurring”, in July of 2013.
These historically-unprecedented positive changes are being driven by many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices based on Wilhelm Reich’s work.
Since Don Croft first fabricated tactical Orgonite in 2000, its widespread, ongoing and ever-increasing distribution has been unknitting and transforming the ancient Death energy matrix built and expanded by our dark masters, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. And, as a result, the Ether is returning to its natural state of health and vitality.
One of those changes is that the populace has recognized that technology has been weaponized against it.
From 2009 to 2014, new cancer cases increased more 10 Percent. That’s cancer of all kinds - driven by wireless technology.
Malignant brain tumors in the U.K. increased 140% - more than doubled – from 1995 to 2016. That’s a doubling of malignant brain tumors, driven by wireless technology.
A study in 2015 showed cellphone radiation causes cancer.
In April 2017, in a landmark ruling, an Italian Court found that cancer was linked to cellphone use.
Just looking at your smartphone makes you less intelligent. Smartphones have a “butterfly brain effect” on users that can cause mental blunders. The effect is measurable even when the phones are switched off, and is worse for those who are more dependent on their mobiles.
People who had their phones on the desk recorded a 10 per cent lower score than those who left them in a different room on operational span tasks, which measures working memory and focus. Those who kept their phones further out of sight in their pockets or their bags scored only slightly better than when phones were placed on desks.
The researchers found that the negative effect of having a phone within eyeshot was significantly greater among those who said they were dependent on their smartphones. Participants who had expressed sympathy with phrases such as “I would have trouble getting through a normal day without my cellphone” and “using my cellphone makes me feel happy” performed as well as others when their phone was in a different room, but worse when it was placed on their desk.
The study also found reaction speeds to be affected, with students who had their phone on the desk responding more sluggishly in high-pace tests.
It even found that phones can even distract users even when they are turned off and placed face down. Those with phones outside of the room “slightly outperformed” those with switched off devices.
The great news is that sales of so-called “smart” phones are decreasing regardless of culture or geography, because the populace has recognized that technology has been weaponized against it.
Nokia’s stock dropped 70% from 2006 to 2016.
In 2013, mobile phone sales dropped for the first time since 2009.
An article from 2014 was headlined “Why I’m Ditching My Smartphone For A Good, Old-Fashioned Cell Phone”.
An article from 2014 was headlined “the downfall of smartphones”.
In 2015, Indian mobile phone sales dropped for the first time in 20 years.
Smartphone sales in India dropped 30.5% from 2016 to 2017.
In January 2016, U.K. actor Eddie Redmayne ditched his smartphone in favour of an analogue handset to help him live “in the moment”.
Households with mobile service but no smartphones rose 7% from 2017 to 2019, as adoption of basic phones doubled among households earning over $100K/year.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “unpredictable”.
That’s why, in 2017, Fortune wrote “AT&T said that smartphone sales had become so unpredictable that it would no longer provide a forecast for the company’s total revenue for 2017.”
In an example similar to that seen with the collapsing McDonald’s corporation, the company has circled the wagons and stopped publishing numbers. That’s because the first rule of politics is “deny, deny, deny”. The author went on to say that AT&T’s iPhone and Galaxy smart phone sales were “way down”.
Where “WAY down” is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
In 2017, students in the U.K. were increasingly turning to brick phones in a backlash against social media.
In January 2017, venture capitalist and Facebook board member Peter Thiel said “the ‘age of Apple’ is at its end”, that “the evolution of the smartphone has reached a zenith.”
In January 2017, five years into the great, epochal positive changes that are occurring at every level of our reality, Phys.org said “Personal computer sales fall for fifth year in a row”.
The word “fall” was used because it’s it’s softer than “drop”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer. But the main reason it was used is because it’s general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the fact that the populace has recognized that technology has been weaponized against it.
In April 2017, BlackBerry was said to be “in REAL trouble”.
Apple’s stock dropped more than 2% in May 2017.
In May 2017, Technology said that Apple reported a “surprise” drop in iPhone sales, “again”.
Gartner said that international sales of smartphones increased 9% in the 1st Quarter of 2017. This while Samsung smartphone sales dropped 50% in China in the 1st Quarter of 2017, to their lowest level in five years.
P.S. The 2017 Internet Trends report showed that global shipments of smartphones grew just three percent in 2019, compared to ten percent in 2016.
In May 2017, Tim Cook blamed the Apple’s sales drop on “press leaks”.
International smartphone shipments dropped 1.3% n the 2nd Quarter of 2017 year-over-year.
Smartphone sales in India dropped 4% in the 2nd Quarter of 2017.
In June 2017, Daily News Egypt said that smart phone sales in Egypt dropped 50% “after flotation”.
In July 2017 the Samsung Galaxy S8 smart phone was selling 20% below 2016’s S7.
LG dropped the prices of its phones “so quickly” in July 2017.
The sales of the Chinese smartphone makers Oppo and Vivo dropped for the first time in India in July 2017, by 30%.
In September 2017, “some people” preferred an “old-fashioned” flip phone.
In September 2017, Apple’s iPhone 8 opening weekend “slowed” as demand “slipped”. Apples sales goals were described as “unrealistic”.
In September 2017, dropping iPhone 8 sales were attributed in part to “quicker ship times.”
In September 2017, Kanye West was the most recent addition to the lineup of celebrities choosing to ditch their smartphones. Claiming he needs more “air to create,”
In October 2017, Essential dropped the price of their smartphone by $200.
Smartphone use “fell” among the young for first time in October 2017.
An opinion piece from October 2017 said “Flip phones are the smart substitute to smart phones”. That same month, another article said “John Stockton, Karl Malone and their flip phones hung out together”, noting “Karl Malone is a staunch proponent of the flip phone, going back to an interview in 2014.”
The Taiwanese smartphone-maker HTC’s shared price dropped over 8% in November 2017, “Google sale report” blamed.
In December 2017, ZDNet said “Brazil sees mobile phone sales slowdown in Q3”. Where “sees” walks it back a step from actually experiencing it.
The word “slowdown” is general, and unexplained. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
The author continues: “Sales dropped by 2 percent as consumers save for Black Friday and Christmas, says IDC.”
That 2% quarterly drop is 8%, annualized, a Ponzi scheme imploding and dropping into its own footprint at freefall speed. “Consumers saving for Christmas” is a plausible-deniability excuse, put forward because the propagandist knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
In December 2017, yahoo.com cooed “Is the iPhone X too expensive for you***?*** Rumored price cut may change that”.
In the future, grade school children will find it impossible to comprehend that sane people paid $1,000 for telephones that had been given away free thirty years previously in our time. I personally find it incomprehensible right now. My flip phone cost $40, and I was angry they charged me that much.
The price of the world’s most efficient and effective Death energy generator is dropping because prices drop either when supply increases, demand decreases, or both. In this case, it’s the latter. Here, in late 2017, we’re seeing the bottom falling out of the so-called “smart” phone market - even the champagne gold ones with two cameras.
In December 2017, BGR said “Wild report says iPhone X price may drop come early 2018”.
Where the author put “report SAYS” on the front end to give the subconscious of the reader the green light to say “oh, but that must have been reported incorrectly!” or “but that’s just one REPORT”. The propagandist knows that many or most readers will gras virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The author hedges again by saying that phone prices only MAY drop, as if it were in question. They’re desperately doing everything they can to blunt and hedge against awareness of the fact that the populace has recognized that technology has been weaponized against it.
In December 2017, androidheadlines.com said “Samsung’s Smartphone Sales To Drop In 2018”, as if they hadn’t already dropped in 2017, but would start to drop soon.
The word “drop” is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
In December 2017, 9t05mac.com said “iPhone X component orders dropping off, but strong demand expected”.
Let’s review the hedging in order:
iPhoneX orders dropping
iPhone X COMPONENT orders dropping
iPhoneX component orders dropping OFF
iPhoneX component orders dropping off, BUT STRONG DEMAND EXPECTED
The author won’t tell you to what extent the COMPONENT orders are dropping OFF, because they’re desperate to keep you from gaining any specific insight into the magnitude of the trend.
The Indian flip phone market doubled in the first quarter of 2018, while its “smart” phone market remained flat year-over-year.
In December 2017, BGR said “Wild report says iPhone X price may drop come early 2018”.
Where the snide “report SAYS” gives the subconscious of the reader the green light to say “oh, but that’s just one report!” The propagandist knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
Price “DROP” is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
There’s also no mention as to why the price is going to drop by some unspecified degree. That’s an example of a propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
Flip phone sales increased 5% in 2019, have grown for four consecutive quarters and currently comprise roughly a quarter of all phones shipped.
In 2019, 48% of Japanese aged 10-19 said they had thought about living without a “smart” phone, the highest percentage among all age groups polled.
THE NON-IONIZING RADIATION OF WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY AS A DRIVER OF BRAIN CANCER AND BRAIN TUMORS
Non-Ionizing radiation from Technology is driving an exponential increase in brain cancer and brain tumors, regardless of geography. And, while they are the most efficient Death energy delivery vehicle yet devised, it’s not just from so-called “smart” phones. It also includes microwave Television transmissions, and microwave oven emissions, high tension power lines, and countless other sources. It’s a long list, that also includes good old fashioned ionizing radiation.
It doesn’t matter where the radiation comes from. The damage from radiation is cumulative and dose-dependent.
That’s why, in June 2012, The Conversation documented that “CT scans can triple risk of brain cancer, leukemia”. Doing what they can to protect the dark agenda of their masters, the controlled press outlet used the only-general “scans” in the headline, and, in journalistic parlance, “buried” the fact that just two scans of the head in childhood were required to triple the risk in the body text below.
The propagandist knows that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines. It’s an example of a propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
Three reviews of the research on cell phone use and brain tumor risk were published in peer-reviewed journals in 2017. Each of these studies reports a statistically significant relationship between cell phone use of ten or more years and brain tumor risk, especially on the side of the head where the cell phone was predominantly placed during phone calls (i.e., ipsilateral use).
From 2009 to 2014, new cancer cases increased more 10 Percent. Malignant brain tumors in the U.K. increased 140% - more than doubled – from 1995 to 2016.
A study in 2015 showed cellphone radiation causes cancer. In April 2017, in a landmark ruling, an Italian Court found that cancer was linked to cellphone use.
In 2017, it was shown that California government buried the truth about cell phone radiation causing brain cancer.
In November 2010, the esteemed journal Oncology published an article entitled “Brain cancer incidence trends in relation to cellular telephone use in the United States”.
Can you see how the fact that cellular telephone use is causing brain cancer to increase exponentially is omitted from the headline? It speaks only generally of “trends”.
The propagandist knows that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines. It’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The article continues: “The recent trend in 20–29-year-old women was driven by a rising incidence of frontal lobe cancers.
Can you see how the general “rising” is once again used to obscure the fact that brain cancer is increasing exponentially? It’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”. They’re trying to blunt your perception of scope of the technology-driven increase in frontal lobe cancers.
They also used “rising” because it’s softer than “increasing”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black-Sun cult that’s ruled things in all the nations, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
In May 2017, nexusnewsfeed.com said “Deadly Brain Tumor Rates Rise in U.S. and Europe – Cell Phones to Blame***?***”
They used “rise” in the headline because it’s general. They’re trying to blunt your perception of scope of the technology-driven increase in Thyroid cancer. They also used it because it’s softer than “increasing”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black-Sun cult that’s ruled things in all the nations, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, the generalization goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
The article continues: “If we analyse the data by tumour type, we can see that whilst the number of overall tumours remains steady, the incidence of glioblastomas increases by between 2 and 3.5% per year and this is statistically significant. Glioblastomas are associated with heavy usage of mobile phones. This trend was also seen in the US by researchers from the Southern Californian Medical School who analysed the incident of brain tumours over a 15 year period with data collected from three central cancer registries. The data showed “decreased rates of primary brain tumours in all sites with the notable exception of increased incidence of glioblastomas multiforme in the frontal lobes, temporal lobes and cerebellum.” Statistically significant increases per year were determined ranging from 1.5 – 3%.”
What is that, a 10% increase in brain cancer for every three years of phone use?
The article continues: “Since 2008, there has been a close to 30% increase in patients with a brain tumor of an “unknown nature” and that increase is not reflected in the national cancer registry, according to a new analysis by Mona Nilsson, a Swedish journalist and the chairman of the Swedish Radiation Protection Foundation. Nilsson reports that the number of Swedes who died of a brain tumor of an unknown nature rose by 157% between 2008 and 2013. And among those younger than 70, the increase was even “more pronounced” — there were 82 such deaths in 2013, compared to only 7 in 2008. Yet, Nilsson adds, “the number of patients reported dead of brain tumors with a confirmed diagnosis declined” during that same period.”
Where they gave you the numbers (7 to 82), but withheld the percentage, as providing it would be much more impactful. So I had to do the math. It’s a 1,071% increase. The author of the article described a 1,000-plus percent increase as “more pronounced”.
The number of Swedes under age 70 who died of a brain tumor “of an unknown nature” increased 1,071% from 2008 and 2013.
The number of patients reported dead of brain tumors with a confirmed diagnosis “declined” during the same period. Here you can see the generational Satanist Medical Establishment describing phone-driven brain tumors as “brain tumor of an unknown nature”, and removing the data from the national cancer registry.
That’s either because there is, wait for it, a Great Big Conspiracy, or because of well-intentioned bumbling, which is obviously going to be the call if you’d like to maintain current programming levels or your membership in the Church of Coincidence Theory.
In May 2017, Natural Blaze sowed the seed of doubt with “Deadly brain tumour rates on the increase in the UK, US, Denmark, Netherlands and Sweden, is it attributable to mobile phones***?***”
Where “on the increase” is general, to keep you from getting any specific idea of the scope of the increase in technology driven brain cancer and brain tumors. It’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The propagandist knows that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why a New York Times article from June 1991 is headlined “Study Finds Mysterious Rise In Childhood Cancer Rate”.
They began the headline with “STUDY finds” to give your subconscious the green light to say “oh, but that was just one study!” The propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
They’ve used the code meme “mysterious” to assure you that neither they nor anyone else has any idea that non-ionizing radiation from Technology is driving exponentially increasing levels of what is only-generally referred to as “childhood cancer”.
The used “rise” because it’s general. They’re trying to blunt your perception of scope of the technology-driven increase in mental illness. They also used it because it’s softer than “increase”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black-Sun cult that’s ruled things in all the nations, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
The article continues “The overall rate of cancer among children is mounting steadily, and the increase for the two most common childhood malignancies, leukemia and brain tumors, is particularly sharp.”
Where “mounting steadily” is general, so you can’t get an idea of the scope of the technology-driven increase in childhood leukemia and brain tumors. It spins the subject as if it were fun, and invigorating. Did you notice how the author omitted “leukemia” and “brain tumors” from the headline, and, in journalistic parlance, “buried” them in the body text? That’s to make the subject far less searchable, and also because the propagandist knows that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines. It’s an example of a propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”. p.s., “sharp”, while lurid, is also general.
The New York Times is an organ of the controlled press, doing what it can to adhere to the international news blackout that is in place on this subject.The risk for glioma brain tumors triples with long-term cell phone use, and the odds of getting one steadily increase with hours of use.
In November 2017, an article that I unsurprisingly now cannot locate was headlined “Mobile phones cause lethal type of brain cancer.”.
Where “lethal type” of brain cancer hedges it back as best it can, trying gymnastically to not say “Mobile phones cause brain cancer”.
While the subhead reads “Mobile phones cause lethal type of brain cancer, major study expected to declare”.
The author added “major STUDY to declare” to the end of the headline to walk it back a step, and to give the subconscious of the reader the green light to say “oh, but that’s just one study!”
The article continues “The American Cancer Society altered its advice about mobile phone use and urged people to limit the time the phones are held to the head. The US National Toxicology Program (NTP) will shortly release the full results of its $25m research project that involved exposing laboratory mice and rats to 10-minute bursts of cell-phone radiation for two years. In an early release of the initial findings, the NTP researchers discovered that brain tumours had developed in the male rats, and that DNA in their brains had been damaged—something that sceptics have said was not biologically possible.”
Where “early release” and “INITIAL findings” allows the subconscious to say “oh, but that was just an EARLY release of INITIAL findings of just one STUDY!” Three consecutive outs.
There’s no specific mention of what the percentage increase was, and no specific description of how the DNA had been damaged. Those are examples of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The article continues: “Anticipating the full results, some academics are already calling for a reclassification of mobile phone radiation as a definite carcinogen (cancer-causing agent) in humans. Dr Anthony B Miller, a professor at the Dalla Lana School of Public Health at the University of Toronto, stated at a lecture last month: "The evidence indicating wireless is carcinogenic has increased and can no longer be ignored. Dr Miller was part of the working group created by the World Health Organization that, in 2011, classified mobile phone radiation as a group 2B carcinogen, which means it is possibly harmful to humans. But he says that, based on new evidence from the NTP and others, the classification should be stronger, and reflect the true harm that the radiation can cause.
The early findings of the NTP study, which was initiated by the US’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA), had a mixed reception. The American Cancer Society altered its advice about mobile phone use and urged people to limit the time the phones are held to the head, but others—including groups funded by the mobile phone industry—were sceptical. They pointed out that brain cancer rates haven’t increased in the years mobile phones have been used, but that is true only for brain tumours in general, while rates of GBMs have risen.”
“Brain cancer rates haven’t increased” is an insane rebuttal. It’s an example of what is known in the Intelligence trade as “stonewalling”.
Remember that, in November 2010, the esteemed journal Oncology published an article entitled “Brain cancer incidence trends in relation to cellular telephone use in the United States” said “The recent trend in 20–29-year-old women was driven by a rising incidence of frontal lobe cancers.”
In December 2017, Forbes widened its eyes to simulate honesty and asked “Are Brain Cancer Rates Increasing, And Do Changes Relate To Cell Phone Use”.
Where “increasing” and “changes” are both general.
The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “vexed”. That’s why the article goes on to say “For more than 20 years there has been public concern regarding the safety of cell phones. Examining changes in brain cancer rates in different countries over the past decades can help provide an answer to this vexed question.”
Where “CHANGES in brain cancer rates” is a general hedge put forward to obscure a two to threefold increase in brain cancer described lower in the article.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “little is known”.
That’s why the article goes on to say “A lesson in how easy it is to be misled - Little is known about the causes of brain cancer and brain tumors. Exposure to ionizing radiation (X-rays) and certain rare genetic syndromes have been identified as causes, but these account for only a small proportion of cases.”
The author’s name is Geoffrey Kabat. Here’s his picture:
(Geoffrey Kabat)
I’ve included it so you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
Remember, Geoff says “little is known” about the causes of brain cancer and brain tumors.
Jeff Miller, Brooklyn, New York, December 14, 2020
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
You can access these articles online at https://forum.orgones.co.uk/c/positive-changes-that-are-occurring/
