DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IS DECREASING EXPONENTIALLY REGARDLESS OF CULTURE OR GEOGRAPHY
Great positive changes are underway at every level of our reality. They began in earnest in 2012, and have been increasing in speed and magnitude. I began writing this series of articles, entitled “Positive Changes That Are Occurring”, in July of 2013.
These historically-unprecedented positive changes are being driven by many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices based on the work of Wilhelm Reich and Karl Hans Welz.
Since Don Croft first fabricated tactical Orgonite in 2000, its widespread, ongoing and ever-increasing distribution has been unknitting and transforming the ancient Death energy matrix built and expanded by our dark masters, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. And, as a result, the Ether is returning to its natural state of health and vitality.
One of those changes is that domestic violence is decreasing exponentially, regardless of culture or geography.
Domestic violence in the U.K. decreased 40% from 1993 to 2013.
Domestic violence in the U.S. decreased 63% from 1994 to 2012.
Domestic violence homicides in Australia decreased 12% from 2010 to 2012 compared to the preceding two-year period from 2008 to 2010.
Domestic violence homicides in Memphis, Tennessee decreased by 19% from 2017 to 2018.
In July 2013, spiked.com said “U.K. - Domestic violence is falling. Why aren’t people celebrating***?***”
The word “falling” was used because it’s it’s softer than “dropping”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer. But the main reason it was used is because it’s general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of statistics that would provide specific insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
The story continues: “The UK’s director of public prosecutions (DPP), Keir Starmer, ought to be pleased with himself. After years of special attention from the authorities, the rate of conviction in domestic-violence cases is up for the second year running, to around 70 per cent of all cases brought to court. That is a big success.”
Where the implication is clearly that domestic violence rates in the U.K. are decreasing by some unspecified degree due to the fact that Mr. Starmer is locking them all up.
Which is a ludicrous ruse, put forward to cover up the truth that more and more people are speaking up against their abusers, and successfully prosecuting them. That’s because moral and mental healthy vary directly with that of the ether.
The propagandist is putting such a specious excuse forward because they know that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The article continues: “On top of that, the number of cases of domestic violence referred by the police to the DPP is way down. The pattern of a higher conviction rate from fewer cases is true not just of domestic violence cases, but also of rape, and also of child-sex abuse.”
Where “WAY down” is, once again, general. It’s used to blunt any specific insight into the magnitude of the trend.
The article continues: “Any public servant with this sort of success ought to be celebrating. But not Keir Starmer. On the contrary, the DPP says he does not believe that the incidence of domestic violence are falling. He wants an inquiry to find out why the numbers are not right. He thinks the police are losing cases of domestic violence.”
Where “losing cases” is, once again, general. Keir is a bloodline Illuminist shill, being featured in a mainstream news article.
Kier is putting forward another completely irrational thesis, because he knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
Saying “the numbers are not right” is an example of the propaganda technique known as stonewalling.
Neither Kier nor the author are mentioning that the drop in domestic violence in the U.K. maps against similar decreases being seen more widely regardless of culture or geography. That’s another example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
Here’s his picture, using a purportedly secret Illuminist hand gesture:
I’ve included his photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
You can’t recognize them by their appearance, beyond their almost-continuous use of supposedly “secret” hand signs.
You can only recognize them by the codified, highly-repetitive way in which they speak, and write.
They’re hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth, figuring the rubes would never notice.
You know them only-generally as “the One Percent”. They are the distinct and separate race that we know as “Neanderthal”. They’re all genetically related to one another. It’s a bloodline thing. As any middle schooler knows:
August 5, 2012 - 12 Year Old Girl Discovers All US Presidents Are Related to King John of England
They’re related through the maternal bloodline.
Here’s what you’re supposed to think a Neanderthal looks like:
While this is what a Neanderthal actually looks like:
(King John I of England, the guy all the US Presidents are related to through their maternal bloodlines)
Apr 17, 2001 — Research leader Dr Rosalind Harding said: ‘It is certainly possible that red hair comes from the Neanderthals.’
2020 - “ScotlandsDNA believes that everyone who carries one of 3 variants of the red-hair gene is a direct descendant of the first redhead ever to have it”
January 31, 2008 - Blue-eyed humans have a single, common ancestor
It’s how the few have controlled the many, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
It’s why the ruling bloodlines of all the nations have the lightest skin.
We’re obviously going to have to recognize and come to terms with this if we’re going to make progress as a species. But they say that the hardest part of a problem is realizing that you have one.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why the article goes on to say: “Starmer does not believe that the incidence of domestic violence is falling. Of course, it is true that crime statistics are open to all kinds of distortion. Still, the British Crime Survey finds that domestic violence has been on the decline since 1993, falling by around 40 per cent. That is a long-term trend that seems unlikely to be changed by statistical juggling.”
After repeatedly pounding the “does not believe” meme into your skull, the author finally tables the actual statistic, which is that domestic violence in the U.K. decreased 40% from 1993 to 2013.
The author put “the British Crime Survey finds” on the front end to give the subconscious of the reader the green light to say “oh, but that was just one survey!”
The Propagandist knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why the article goes on to say “We do not know why the rate of domestic violence is falling. One likely reason is that more women are earners in their own right. Since the 1990s, there have been as many women on the payroll as men (though men in aggregate work more hours). Women who earn are less likely to stay with men who beat them. Another reason is that society’s attitudes towards domestic violence have changed. Wife beating was not acceptable in the 1970s, but there was a greater willingness to turn a blind eye to it. Nowadays, most people are horrified by it.”
Where the author has, in journalistic parlance, “buried” the real driver down below a ridiculous plausible-deniability excuse. Society’s attitudes toward domestic violence are continuing to change for the better because moral and mental health vary directly with that of the subject’s etheric environment.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why the article goes on to say “There is yet another clue to the fall in rates of domestic violence. And that is that all violence has been falling since the 1990s. This is not just a British phenomenon; it is reported in the US and Europe, too. It seems that contemporary society is just a lot more squeamish about violence.”
Where, hilariously, “SQUEAMISH” implies that men have become pussies, afraid to properly inflict violence on their wives. It is also, however, another major admission that the the general moral and mental health of the populace is improving.
The word “fall” was used serially because it’s it’s softer than “drop” or “decrease”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer.
In August 2014, the Christian Science Monitor said “In US, a decline in domestic violence”.
Where they used “decline” because it’s softer than “drop”, and because it’s general, and because it echoes the word “recline”. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
The author bravely averred that the unspecified decrease in domestic violence was merely confined to the United States. That’s another example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The article continues: “Annual rates of nonfatal domestic violence fell by 63 percent between 1994 and 2012.”
Can you see how an article from 2014 bravely used two year old data, to do what it could to blunt and defray insight into the even greater decreases in domestic violence being seen post 2012?
The author from the duplicitously-named Christian Science Monitor unscientifically did not mention that exponentially decreasing domestic violence in the United States was part of a larger trend taking place regardless of culture or geography. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
They also didn’t offer any suggestion as to what was driving the trend in the U.S. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
They’re desperate to keep you from recognizing that moral and mental health vary directly with that of the subject’s etheric environment.
In April 2015, in the face of exponentially decreasing rates of domestic violence being seen regardless of culture or geography, Domestic Shelters widened its eyes to simulate honesty and asked “Are Domestic Violence Rates Dropping?”
Where “dropping” is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of statistics that would provide specific insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
The article continues: “Statistics show incidents of domestic violence are down, but advocates say they aren’t seeing it.
Where the general “down” was once again put forward as a general hedge against a far more impactful, specific statistic. And where “advocates” is, once again, general.
The author put “statistics show” on the front end to give the subconscious of the reader the green light to say “oh, but you can make statistics say ANYTHING!”
The propagandist knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The article continues: “Some good news, for once, regarding domestic violence: It seems there’s less of it. A report released last year from the Bureau of Justice Statistics showed that the incidents of nonfatal domestic violence have declined 63 percent since 1994, from 13.5 victimizations per 1,000 people over age 12 in 1994 to 5 victimizations per 1,000 individuals in 2012.”
The layers of hedging are so deep and continuous that I’m going to have to ask the reader to figure them out on their own, by reviewing the bold italic highlights.
To mention only a few, great news is hedged down to merely “good” news. “LESS domestic violence” is only-general. The author put “A REPORT released last year” to give the subconscious of the reader the green light to say “oh, but that was just one report!”, or “oh, someone must have reported that incorrectly!”
The propagandist knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
I have to give them a high-five for actually doing the math. Domestic violence in the United States decreased 63% from 1994 to 2012.
Can you see how an article from 2015 is using three year old data, to defray against the even greater decreases in domestic violence being seen from 2012 forward?
The author did not mention that exponentially decreasing domestic violence in the United States was part of a larger trend taking place regardless of culture or geography. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
They also didn’t offer any suggestion as to what was driving the trend in the U.S. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
They’re desperate to keep you from recognizing that moral and mental health vary directly with that of the subject’s etheric environment.
In February 2016, directly in the face of exponentially decreasing domestic violence in Australia, and everywhere else, the Conversation widened its eyes to simulate honesty and asked “FactCheck Q&A: is domestic violence in Australia on the decline?”
Where they used “decline” because it’s softer than “drop”, and because it’s general, and because it echoes the word “recline”. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
“ON the decline” hedges back a step from “domestic violence in Australia is declining”.
The subhead reads “Are domestic violence figures actually on the decline***?***”
Where the author has added “figures” to give the subconscious of the reader the green light to say “oh, but someone must have figured that incorrectly!”
The propagandist knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The article continues: “Ronaldo Aquino (audience member): Just over a week ago, Mark Latham alleged that the domestic violence figures are actually on the decline and he was chastised for it in social media and I checked the Australian Institute of Criminology and he was actually right. The figures actually peaked around 2007. So is this a case of the squeaky wheel gets the grease?”
Where, once again, the general “ON the decline” and “he was actually right” and “the FIGURES actually peaked” are all hedging generalizations put forward to mask the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
The article continues: “Tony Jones: … It might be a job for our fact checking unit on the issue of the statistics.”
Pure stonewalling.
The article continues: “Q&A audience member Ronald Aquino and host Tony Jones. According to the Australian Institute of Criminology’s National Homicide Monitoring Program, rates of intimate partner homicide have declined since reaching a peak in 2007-08.”
The author is soldiering on, once again putting forward the hedging generalization “declined” to mask the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
The article continues: “For example, the most recently published figures report that in the two-year period between 2010 and 2012 there were 109 intimate partner homicides. That is a small decrease from the 122 intimate partner homicides for the proceeding two-year period 2008 to 2010.”
Where “a SMALL increase” was put forward as a hedging generalization against a far more impactful, specific statistic. So, I had to do the math.
Domestic violence homicides in Australia decreased 12% from 2010 to 2012 compared to the preceding two year period from 2008 to 2010.
Can you see how, here in 2016, the author of the article is using data from four years previously? They used data from right before the great positive changes I’m documenting here got underway in earnest. The author from the Conversation called the historically-unprecedented, double-digit decrease in domestic homicide “small”.
The article concludes: “Verdict - Despite small decreases in intimate partner homicides, Australian data from the last decade overall does not indicate that domestic violence is in decline.”
Mind-bogglingly, the author says that an historically-unprecedented decrease in domestic homicide in Australia does not indicate that domestic violence in Australia is decreasing. That’s another example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
The author did not mention that exponentially decreasing domestic violence in Australia was part of a larger trend taking place regardless of culture or geography. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
They’re desperate to keep you from recognizing that moral and mental health vary directly with that of the subject’s etheric environment.
In March 2017, an article I can no longer locate said “Domestic Violence Conviction Rate Falling in New Mexico”.
Where the author used “falling” because it’s it’s softer than “dropping” or “decreasing”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer. But the main reason it was used is because it’s general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of statistics that would provide specific insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
The headline clearly implies that it’s poor courtroom execution that’s causing the drop.
The author did not mention that exponentially decreasing domestic violence in New Mexico was part of a larger trend taking place regardless of culture or geography. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
They also didn’t offer any suggestion as to what was driving the trend in New Mexico. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
They’re desperate to keep you from recognizing that moral and mental health vary directly with that of the subject’s etheric environment.
In January 2018, vmcactionnews5.com said “Domestic violence homicides drop in 2017–but could still increase.”
Where “drop” is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of statistics that would provide specific insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
“But could still INCREASE” is also general. By what amount? Why? It’s a false, hypothetical general hedge put forward to defray the great positive change I’m documenting here.
The article continues: “The number of domestic violence homicides fell in 2017. However, experts said that may not mean the problem is improving.”
The word “fell” was used because it’s it’s softer than “dropped” or “decreased”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer. But the main reason it was used is because it’s general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of statistics that would provide specific insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Can you see how “experts” is also general?
The article continues: “Memphis Police Department solved 129 of the 200 homicides in 2017. Ninety-five percent of those cases involved victims and suspects who knew each other. Twenty-six of them are specifically labeled as domestic violence-related homicides. That’s down from 32 in 2015.”
The author provided the numbers, but carefully withheld the far more impactful percentage decrease between them. So, I had to do the math. Domestic violence homicides in Memphis, Tennessee decreased by 19% from 2017 to 2018.
The article concludes: “However, experts said the number of domestic violence homicides could increase as more of the homicides are solved.”
Where “experts” and “more” are, once again, general. It’s a fictitious hedge, but forward to blunt and defray against the great positive change I’m documenting here.
The author did not mention that exponentially decreasing domestic violence in Memphis, Tennessee was part of a larger trend taking place regardless of culture or geography. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
They also didn’t offer any suggestion as to what was driving the trend in Tennessee. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
They’re desperate to keep you from recognizing that moral and mental health vary directly with that of the subject’s etheric environment
Jeff Miller, Brooklyn, New York, February 4, 2021
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
You can access these articles online at https://forum.orgones.co.uk/c/positive-changes-that-are-occurring/
