“Mr Bond, they have a saying in Chicago: ‘Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it’s enemy action’.”
From “Goldfinger”, by Ian Fleming, 1959
THE DATA
From 2008 to 2017, the incidence rate for nonmalignant tumors in the U.S. was 117% higher in females ages 25-29 years than it was among males of the same age (10.2% vs. 4.7%).
From 2008 to 2017, the incidence rate for nonmalignant tumors in the U.S. was 62.5% higher in females than it was among males (20.8% vs. 12.8%).
From 1992 to 2022, prostate cancer in the U.K. increased by 48%.
From 1973 to 2015, cancer among individuals in the U.S. between 15 and 39 years old increased by 30%. 80% of that quantum increase in cancer cases were white people.
From 1973 to 2015, kidney cancer in adolescents and young adults in the U.S. increased by 30%, or almost one third”.
From 2014 to 2018, malignant Melanoma in Alabama increased by 20.9%, from 19.3 per 100,000 to 23.4 per 100,000.
From 1973 to 2022, prostate cancer mortality rates in the U.K. increased by 17%.
From 2014 to 2018, prostate cancer in Alabama increased by 12.2%.
From 2016 to 2018, prostate cancer in the U.K. increased by 8%. Cancer Research U.K. said the increase took place “over the last decade”.
From 2008 to 207, Meningioma in the United States increased by 6.3%.
Breast cancer mortality in Alabama increased by 4.4% from 2014 to 2018. Alabama Public Health said that the trend “was not statistically significant”.
THE ARTICLES
In December 2020, Forbes published William Hazeltine’s “Cancer Rates Are On The Rise In Adolescents And Young Adults New Study Shows”.
Where, in addition to being completely general, “on the rise’ is bright, and up-beat, and also a thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black-Sun cult that’s run things in all the nations, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
He tacked “new study shows” on the end of the headline to give the subconscious of the Coincidence theorist the green light to say “oh, but that was just one study!” or “oh, you can make those studies show anything!”
The propagandist knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
Here’s a picture of Mr. Haseltine, using a purportedly-secret Illuminist hand gesture:
[image]
Author William Haseltine, using a purportedly-secret Illuminist hand gesture. With his left hand. He’s a follower of the Left Hand path. He figured the rubes would never notice.)
I’ve included Mr. Haseltine’s picture so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
For any mouth-breathing Coincidence theorists lingering in the readership huffing and puffing that he couldn’t, and he wouldn’t, here’s a Linkedin profile picture of a rank-and-file generational Satanist computer programmer using the same purportedly-secret Illuminist hand gesture that Mr. Haseltine is in the photo immediately above:
[image]
(Software Engineer, using the same purportedly-secret Illuminist hand gesture as author William Haseltine is in the picture immediately above. With her left hand. She’s a follower of the Left Hand path. She figured the rubes would never notice.)
And, because the third time it’s enemy action, here’s another photo of a prominent Illuminist using the same purportedly-secret Illuminist hand gesture that the computer programmer and Mr. Haseltine are in the two photos immediately above:
[image]
(A prominent Illuminist, whom you might remember from the Oscars this past weekend, using the same purportedly-secret Illuminist hand gesture that the computer programmer and Mr. Haseltine are in the two photos immediately above. With his left hand. He’s a follower of the Left Hand path. He figured the rubes would never notice.)
You might remember the prominent Illuminist in the photo immediately above from their Psy-Op on the Oscars this past weekend.
My research to date shows that they comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace. They’re all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. It’s how the few have controlled the many, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those many variants is “stunned”. That’s why Mr. Haseltine’s Forbes’ hit-piece goes on to say: “In a recent study of cancer trends among adolescents and young adults in the US, researchers reported a stunning thirty percent increase in cancer diagnoses among individuals fifteen to thirty-nine years old between 1973 and 2015.”
Where “stunning” is violent positive spin which conjures a gorgeous woman who is so beautiful, you cannot help but look at her.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those many variants is “surprised”. That’s why the article goes on to say: “Researchers collected data on age at diagnosis, sex, race, type of cancer, and survival from almost 500,000 of the adolescents and young adults diagnosed with cancer between 1973 and 2015 from a National Cancer Institute database. Of the almost 500,000 individuals between the ages of fifteen and thirty-nine with invasive cancer included in this study, 80% were white. This surprising finding was unaddressed by the researchers and is another stark example of the disparities in access to healthcare between white and non-white populations.”
Those only-generally-referred to “Researchers”, whose names and employers Mr. Haseltine made a tortured point of not mentioning, somehow omitted the fact that everyone getting cancer was white. This despite the fact that they loves them some cancer like it is, in fact, their jobs.
Haseltine then widened his eyes to suggest honesty and lied bald-facedly that people of color had just as much cancer, only they weren’t rich enough to get to the Doctor and find out, and have us learn about it, later.
But, wait, it gets even better. Haseltine goes on to say: “Researchers suggest that the increase is likely due to a combination of environmental and lifestyle factors, and changes in screening and diagnosis.”
It’s a powerful pile of Black magic, with a lot of truth in it. Because that’s how Disinformation works. The only-generally-mentioned “environmental and lifestyle factors” are “phone addiction” and “purportedly-harmless non-Ionizing radiation being beamed into their skulls”, and the accurate but only-generally-described change in diagnosis went from “they didn’t have cancer” to “now they have cancer from the purportedly-harmless non-Ionizing radiation they’ve been bathing in.”
Yet the NPR addict will take the generalities and gulp them down whole, and look no further, as they’ll grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
From 1973 to 2015, cancer among individuals in the U.S. between 15 and 39 years old increased by 30%. 80% of that quantum increase in cancer cases were white people.
In 2021, Alabama Public Health.gov said “Between 2014 and 2018, the percentage change for prostate cancer incidence in Alabama had an overall increase of 12.2 percent”.
From 2014 to 2018, prostate cancer in Alabama increased by 12.2%.
The article goes on to say “For breast cancer mortality between 2014 and 2018, the percentage change had an overall increase of 4.4 percent”.
From 2014 to 2018, breast cancer mortality in Alabama increased by 4.4%. Alabama Public Health said that the trend “was not statistically significant”.
From 2014 to 2018, malignant Melanoma in Alabama increased by 20.9%, from 19.3 per 100,000 to 23.4 per 100,000.
In August 2021, sciencedaily.com said “incidence rates for meningioma, which accounts for 54% of all nonmalignant cases in the U.S., increased by 0.9% annually among adults from 2008 to 2017.”
Can you see how they diced it up, cutting it down to .9% per year, to avoid saying “From 2008 to 207, Meningioma in the United States increased by 6.3%”?
That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The article goes on to say “Conversely, incidence rates for nonmalignant tumors were higher in females (20.3) compared to males (12.8).”
Can you see how the uncredited Author from the American Cancer Society provided the numbers, but carefully replaced the far more impactful percentage increase between them with the hedging generality “higher in females”?
So, I had to do the math to learn that, from 2008 to 2017, the incidence rate for nonmalignant tumors in the U.S. was 62.5% higher in females than it was among males (20.8% vs. 12.8%).
The omission of the percentage increase is an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The article goes on to say “For nonmalignant tumors, sex differences peaked in ages 25-29 years, among whom rates in females were >2-fold those in males (10.2 versus 4.7 per 100,000), a pattern driven by high pituitary adenoma rates in females in this age group.”
Can you see how the uncredited author from the American Cancer Society provided the numbers, but carefully replaced the far more impactful percentage increase between them with the hedging generality “>2-fold”?
The omission of the percentage increase is an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
So, I had to do the math to learn that, from 2008 to 2017, the incidence rate for nonmalignant tumors in the U.S. was 117% higher in females ages 25-29 years than it was among males of the same age (10.2% vs. 4.7%).
The author brightly mentions that pituitary tumors were the reason, but, despite loving them some cancer like it is, in fact their job, the uncredited author from the American Society doesn’t offer any suggestion as to why women aged 25-29 got well more than twice as many of them as men did.
That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
In February 2022, Medical News Today widened its eyes to simulate honesty and asked “Why is there an increase in cancer diagnoses?”
They’re playing the “increased awareness” ruse, which purports that all that extra cancer was there all along, only no one had looked for it with the proper assiduousness, previously.
The uncredited article goes on to say “In addition, research indicates that from 1973 to 2015, certain subtypes of cancer — specifically carcinoma of the kidney — have risen in adolescents and young adults in the U.S., with an overall cancer rate increase of 29.6% in this age group.”
That’s a big cloud of words blown to avoid simply stating “from 1973 to 2015, kidney cancer in adolescents and young adults in the U.S. increased by 30%, or almost one third”.
Beyond “the utilization of advanced imaging diagnostics, which detect earlier stages of cancer and/or more indolent forms of cancer”, the uncredited author from Medical News Today offered no suggestion as to what might have caused adolescents and young adults in the U.S. to have 30% more kidney cancer in 2015 than they did in 1973. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
For any mouth-breathing Coincidence theorists lingering in the readership, I need to break the news that you don’t need “advanced imaging diagnostics” to recognize the fact that you have cancer in your kidney.
The propagandist from Medical News Today put if forward because they know that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
In March 2022, cancerresearchuk.org said “Since the early 1990s, prostate cancer incidence rates have increased by almost half (48%) in males in the UK (2016-2018). Over the last decade, prostate cancer incidence rates have increased by almost a tenth (8%) in males in the UK (2016-2018).”
Can you see how the uncredited author from Cancer Research U.K. called an 8% increase in prostate cancer in the U.K. from 2016 to 2018 “over the last decade”?
From 1992 to 2022, prostate cancer in the U.K. increased by 48%.
From 2016 to 2018, prostate cancer in the U.K. increased by 8%. Cancer Research U.K. said the increase took place “over the last decade”.
The article goes on to say “Since the early 1970s, prostate cancer mortality rates have increased by a sixth (17%) in males in the UK.
From 1973 to 2022, prostate cancer mortality rates in the U.K. increased by 17%.
