“If there is any period one would desire to be born in, is it not the age of Revolution; when the old and the new stand side by side, and admit of being compared; when the energies of all men are searched by fear and by hope; when the historic glories of the old can be compensated by the rich possibilities of the new era?”
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
From 1976 to 2022, Americans with no trust at all in the mass media to report the news fully, accurately and fairly increased by 1,167%, from a record low 3% to a record high 38%.
From 2021 to 2022, the 11.8% increase in complete distrust in the mass media in the United States was 293% greater, or almost four times greater than its 3% increase from 2020 to 2021.
Confidence games run on trust. The self-described Con “artist” puts on fair guise and pretends to be friends with the person or persons whom they are going to swindle. Then they use misdirection and subterfuge to take advantage of them.
The thing about Confidence games is that, once the Con artist has been discovered, or “made”, the Confidence game collapses in a rush, like a house of cards.
The statistics which I am presenting here document incontrovertibly that the game is over for these people.
It’s just that nobody has read about it, yet.
But they say that there is nothing more powerful than an idea whose time has come.
THE DATA
From 1976 to 2022, Americans with no trust at all in the mass media to report the news fully, accurately and fairly increased by 1,167%, from a record low 3% to a record high 38%.
From 1976 to 2022, the average annual increase in complete distrust in the mass media in the United States was 25.4%.
From 1976 to 2022, the 25.4% average annual increase in complete distrust in the mass media in the United States was 20% greater than its 21.1% average annual increase from 1976 to 2017.
The great positive societal change is increasing, going forward in time.
That’s because moral and mental health vary directly with that of the subject’s etheric environment, and the health of the ether is inexorably increasing.
From 1976 to 2017, Americans with no trust at all in the mass media to report the news fully, accurately and fairly increased by 866%, from a record low 3% to a record high 29%.
From 1976 to 2017, the average annual increase in complete distrust in the mass media in the United States was 21.1%.
In 1976, a record low 3% of Americans had no trust at all in the mass media to report the news fully, accurately and fairly.
Ah, those were the days. I was in sixth grade in 1976.
For grade school children studying the subject in the future, this is what people looked like in 1976, when just about everybody trusted the media to report the news fully, accurately and fairly:
(Will Ferrell, as television newscaster Ron Burgundy, from “Anchorman: the Legend of Ron Burgundy”, 2004 - note how Will is making a purportedly-secret Maconic “gesture of recognition” and is in front of a Satanic purple background.)
For any Coincidence theorists lingering in the readership, here’s an historic depiction of purportedly-secret Masonic “gestures of recognition”:
(18th Century depiction of purportedly-secret Masonic “gestures of recognition”.)
From 2017 to 2022, Americans with no trust at all in the mass media to report the news fully, accurately and fairly increased by 31%, from a record high 29% to a record high 38%.
From 2017 to 2022, the average annual increase in complete distrust in the mass media in the United States was 6.2%.
In 2017, a record high 29% of Americans had no trust at all in the mass media to report the news fully, accurately and fairly.
From 2020 to 2021, Americans with no trust at all in the mass media to report the news fully, accurately and fairly increased by 3%, from a record high 33% to a record high 34%.
In 2020, a record high 33% of Americans had no trust at all in the mass media to report the news fully, accurately and fairly.
From 2021 to 2022, Americans with no trust at all in the mass media to report the news fully, accurately and fairly increased by 11.8%, from a record high 34% to a record high 38%.
From 2021 to 2022, the 11.8% increase in complete distrust in the mass media in the United States was 293% greater, or almost four times greater than its 3% increase from 2020 to 2021.
From 2021 to 2022, the 11.8% increase in complete distrust in the mass media in the United States was 90% greater, or almost twice as great as its 6.2% average annual increase from 2017 to 2022.
The great positive societal change is increasing exponentially, going forward in time.
That’s because moral and mental health vary directly with that of the subject’s etheric environment, and the health of the ether is inexorably increasing.
In 2021, a record high 34% of Americans had no trust at all in the mass media to report the news fully, accurately and fairly.
In 2022, a record high 38% of Americans had no trust at all in the mass media to report the news fully, accurately and fairly.
In October 2023, a Gallup poll showed that 38% of Americans had no trust at all in mass media to report fully, accurately and fairly.
In October 2023, a Gallup poll showed that 27% of Americans had only a fair amount of trust at all in mass media to report fully, accurately and fairly.
On October 20, 2023, poynter.org said “Opinion | American trust in media is near a record low, study finds”.
On February 6, 2024, bostonherald.com said “Editorial: Majority doesn’t trust Supreme Court on election rulings: Poll”.
These two nearly-identical headlines on decreasing trust are examples of what is known as “horizontal propaganda” or “integration propaganda”.
On December 5, 2023, the Washington Post’s Tom Rosenstiel widened his eyes to simulate honesty and said “Actually, people don’t hate the media as much as you think”.
When, in fact, Americans with no trust at all in the mass media to report the news fully, accurately and fairly increased by 1,167% from 1976 to 2022, from a record low 3% to a record high 38%.
I have exposed the duplicity of Tom Rosenstiel and the Washington Post by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In March 2024, a CNN poll showed that 36% of Democrats and Independents had no trust at all in the Supreme Court at all to make the right decisions on legal cases related to the election.
In March 2024, a CNN poll showed that 35% of Americans had just some trust in the Supreme Court to make the right decisions on legal cases related to the election.
In March 2024, a CNN poll showed that 31% of Republicans had just some trust in the Supreme Court at all to make the right decisions on legal cases related to the election.
In March 2024, a CNN poll showed that 28% of Americans had no trust at all in the Supreme Court at all to make the right decisions on legal cases related to the election.
In March 2024, a CNN poll showed that 27% of Democrats and Independents had no trust at all in the Supreme Court at all to make the right decisions on legal cases related to the election.
In March 2024, a CNN poll showed that 17% of Republicans had no trust at all in the Supreme Court at all to make the right decisions on legal cases related to the election.
THE ARTICLES
OCTOBER 2023
On October 20, 2023, poynter.org said “Opinion | American trust in media is near a record low, study finds”.
Where authors Annie Aguiar and Angela Fu said “near a record low” because it is general.
As propagandists, they know that seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and their technique goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the specific scope of the decrease in trust in the Media which they are attempting to obfuscate.
Ms. Aguiar and Ms. Fu tacked “opinion” and “study finds” on the front and back ends of the headline to give the subconscious of the Coincidence theorist reader the green light to say “oh, but that was just the opinion of those two authors” and “oh, but they can make those studies find anything!”.
As a propagandist, the curiously-uncredited author from the Boston Herald knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
Speaking of those two authors, why or how can an article or editorial have two authors? Scientific studies, yes. However here, in this Editorial, Angela Fu’s bizarre inclusion is the appearance of a Chinese handler behind a more palatable Anglo Saxon first author.
The article goes on to say "A Gallup poll released this week found that Americans’ trust in mass media to report “fully, accurately and fairly” is only two points higher than the lowest Gallup has ever recorded. The results, which are essentially unchanged from last year, show that only 7% of Americans have “a great deal” of trust and confidence in the media, while 27% say they have “a fair amount” of trust in mass media.
Twenty-eight percent of U.S. adults surveyed in the poll say they don’t have much confidence in the media, with 38% saying they have none at all."
There is a strict rule in journalism, where you list the highest number or percentage first, and then the rest in descending order. Yet, here, poynter.org’s Annie Aguiar and Angela Fu Satanically inverted them, leading with 7%, following that with 27%, and concluding with 38%.
That’s an example of what is known as “Black magic”. It is often hidden behind the general meme “spin”.
I have exposed the duplicity of Annie Aguiar, Angela Fu and poynter.org by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In 2022, a Gallup poll showed that 38% of Americans had no trust at all in mass media to report fully, accurately and fairly.
In 2022, a Gallup poll showed that 27% of Americans had only a fair amount of trust at all in mass media to report fully, accurately and fairly.
Since we know that generational Satanist Freemasons comprise twenty to thirty percent of the population, this 7% of Americans who professed to have a great deal of trust in the Media in October 2023 is quite cheering, given that it shows that most of the “fair amount of trust” crowd are also generational Satanists, all forced to vote “party line” on the issue.
Now, adding 38%, 27% and 7% adds up to 72%, not 100%, as it should, so something is rotten in the state of Denmark.
The article goes on to say:
“This poll is the first time the percentage of Americans with no trust in the media at all is higher than the percentage of respondents with a great deal or fair amount of trust combined.”
We have reached the tipping point, the critical mass of awareness where the Confidence game begins to fall into its own footprint at freefall speed like a Manhattan skyscraper brought down by controlled demolition.
Here’s a picture of Annie Aguiar, where she’s pointedly off-center to the left in the frame, to make her left eye the focal point of the image:
(Annie Aguiar)
And here’s a picture of Angela Fu, in a Satanic purple top against a Satanic green background:
(Angela Fu)
The upper image features Ms. Aguiar’s left eye because, to generational Satanist Freemasons like Annie, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or the “eye of Horus”.
But don’t take my word for it:
‘The right eye is the Eye of Ra and the left is the Eye of Horus’.”
From “Freemasonry - Religion And Belief - The 3rd Temple”
Facebook: “Welcome to the Left-Hand-Path-Network, where Satanism is not about worship, but it’s study.”
I have included their pictures so that you could get a better idea of what generational Satanist Freemasons of marginal influence look like.
They figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise roughly twenty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth.
It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else."
FEBRUARY 2024
On February 6, 2024, bostonherald.com said “Editorial: Majority doesn’t trust Supreme Court on election rulings: Poll”.
Where the uncredited author from the Boston Herald said “majority doesn’t trust Supreme Court” because it is general.
As a propagandist, they know that seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and their technique goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the specific scope of the decrease in trust in the Supreme Court which they are attempting to obfuscate.
For those unaware, anytime an author is uncredited, it is proof that said author is an Intelligence operative.
The uncredited Intelligence operative from the State propaganda organ known as the Boston Herald tacked “Editorial” and “Poll” on the front and back ends of the headline to give the subconscious of the Coincidence theorist reader the green light to say “oh, but that was just the opinion of one editor” and “oh, but that was just one poll!”.
As a propagandist, the curiously-uncredited author from the Boston Herald knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
If it’s an “Editorial”, then how come the Editor who wrote it is uncredited?
You have to dig five paragraphs down into the article to get to this:
"A CNN poll released Monday found a majority saying they don’t have much confidence in the Supreme Court to make the “right decisions” on legal cases related to the election, as The Hill reported.
Asked how much they trust the Supreme Court on the matter, 58% said either “not at all” or “just some,” at 23% and 35%, respectively. Only 11% said they trusted the Supreme Court “a great deal,” while 31% said “a moderate amount.”
In March 2024, a CNN poll showed that 28% of Americans had no trust at all in the Supreme Court at all to make the right decisions on legal cases related to the election.
In March 2024, a CNN poll showed that 35% of Americans had just some trust in the Supreme Court to make the right decisions on legal cases related to the election.
The article goes on to say:
“Among Democrats, 63% had either no trust at all, at 27%, or just some trust — 36% — compared to Republicans, 48% of whom said they had either no trust, 17%, in the court or just some trust — 31%. Independents held similar views to Democrats.”
In March 2024, a CNN poll showed that 27% of Democrats and Independents had no trust at all in the Supreme Court at all to make the right decisions on legal cases related to the election.
In March 2024, a CNN poll showed that 36% of Democrats and Independents had no trust at all in the Supreme Court at all to make the right decisions on legal cases related to the election.
In March 2024, a CNN poll showed that 17% of Republicans had no trust at all in the Supreme Court at all to make the right decisions on legal cases related to the election.
In March 2024, a CNN poll showed that 31% of Republicans had just some trust in the Supreme Court at all to make the right decisions on legal cases related to the election.
Jeff Miller, Honolulu, HI, March 25, 2024
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, please send me a note at [email protected]