"Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense.”
From “1984”, by George Orwell, 1949
July 2018 - Massive bluefin tuna is a new Florida fishing record
April 2022 - Massive 832-Pound Bluefin Tuna Breaks Florida Fishing Record
September 2021 - Potential California State Record Bluefin Landed at 395/4 pounds.
May 2022 - South Texas fisherman lands state record bluefin tuna off Port Aransas coast
THE DATA
From some obfuscated prior date and 2014, the girls’ junior IGFA world record bluefin tuna increased in size by 43% , from 431 pounds to 616 pounds.
From 1986 to 2022, the Texas state record bluefin tuna increased in size by 8.5% , from 807 pounds to 876 pounds.
From 1990 to 2021, the California state record bluefin tuna increased in size by 63%, from 243 pounds, 11 ounces to 395.4 pounds. 83% of that increase in size took place in 2016.
From 1990 to 2016, the California state record bluefin tuna increased in size by .5%, from 243 pounds, 11 ounces to to 245 pounds. That’s an example of a record being broken by a tiny margin, over decades, as one would expect, given the scientific truth that organisms increase in ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size.
From (month) 2016 to August 2016, the California state spearfishing record bluefin tuna increased by 45%, from 185 pounds, 11 ounces to 269 pounds, 11 ounces.
From 2016 to 2017, the California state record bluefin tuna increased in size by 52% , from 245 pounds to 373 pounds.
Wait, what? After increasing in size by one half of one percent from 1990 to 2016, in 2016, the bluefin tuna in California suddenly grew half again as large, in a single year.
Since we live in the Middle Ages, no one but myself noticed that, in 2016, the growth rate of the bluefin tuna in California suddenly increased exponentially, going forward in time. That’s not supposed to be scientifically possibly, at least according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms grown in ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size, and, further that there is “no such thing as the ether”.
They’re desperate to keep you from recognizing that the size, fertility, longevity, and very existence of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.
From 2017 to 2020, the California state record bluefin tuna increased in size by 2.9%, from 373 pounds to 384 pounds.
From 2020 to 2021, the California state record bluefin tuna increased in size by 3%, from 384 pounds to 395.4 pounds.
Wait, what? Here, again, we see a larger rate of growth from 2020 to 2021 than we did from 2017 to 2020. The growth rate of the bluefin tuna in California is once again increasing, going forward in time.
That’s not supposed to be scientifically possibly, at least according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms grown in ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size, and, further that there is “no such thing as the ether”.
They’re desperate to keep you from recognizing that the size, fertility, longevity, and very existence of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.
From 2017 to 2022, the largest tuna ever caught in the history of fishing in Florida increased by .66%, from 826.5 pounds to 832 pounds.
USA Today’s David Strenge “The Atlantic bluefin tuna are typically caught farther north, and Whitley’s catch in May of 2017 fills a vacant category for the species in Florida”.
Where “fills a vacant category for the species” is Mil-speak for “tuna are moving further south as the Atlantic Ocean continues to get colder.”
Can you see how there’s no mention, specifically, as to why bluefin tuna are typically caught farther north?
That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
THE ARTICLES
In 2014, the U.K.'s Daily Mail said “She’s the reel deal! 12-year-old girl’s record breaking 616-pound monster bluefin tuna is no fishy tale”.
Where the general “breaking” the record obscures the far more impactful percentage increase between the records.
The article goes on to say “Jenna Gavin, 12, from Nova Scotia, Canada, caught the record-breaking fish - She battled with the 616-pound monster fish for almost two hours - She beat the previous record of 431 pounds for a fish landed by a girl 11-16.”
This article, and every other I researched all omitted when the previous record was, and who set it. The York Post said “a French girl”.
So, I had to do the math to learn that, from some obfuscated prior date and 2014, the girls’s junior IGFA world record bluefin tuna increased in size by 43%, from 431 pounds to 616 pounds.
In January 2017, cdfw.wordpress.com said “Snapshot: New State Angling and Diving Records”.
Where, under the false guise of famiarity and “journalistic efficiency” the curiously-unnamed author used completely general language to completely obscure what state they are speaking of, and what sorts of fish they were talking about. It makes the subject completely unsearchable, and is an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The article goes on to say “On June 22, 2016 Kevin Scully speared a 269 lb. 11 oz. bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) off Mission Bay to smash that species’ state diving record. This new record beats Mr. Scully’s previous bluefin tuna record by 84 lb. (yes, he beat his own record, which he set earlier that same year!).” 269 x 16 plus 11 minus 84 x 16 4315 minus 1344 = 2971
From some June 2016 or earlier to August 2016, the California spearfishing state record bluefin tuna increased in size by 45%
Where the author provided the weights of the old and new record holders, but replace the far more impactful, specific percentage increase between the records with the lurid-but-general “smash that species’ state diving record”.
So, I had to do the math to learn that, in 2016, the California state spearfishing record bluefin tuna increased by 221%, or more than tripled in size, from 84 pounds to 269 pounds, 11 ounces.
The article goes on to say “Then, on August 14, 2016 John Correia landed a 245 lb. 0 oz. bluefin tuna on rod and reel to capture the state angling record for that species. Mr. Correia’s fish, which he hooked at 43 Fathoms…”
There, right at that spot, is where the article goes behind a paywall! And that, my friend, is what is referred to as “evidence of a Great Big Conspiracy”.
In October 2017, bdoutdoors.com said “373 pound bluefin tuna…call it: that fish!”
I’m sorry to be the one to break it to you, but you can ask anyone who’s ever written for a living…any time an author is uncredited, it’s a tell that said author is an Intelligence operative.
Under the false guise of familiarity, the curiously-unnamed author omitted the words “California”, “State” and “Record”. It’s completely unsearchable. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
Then you have to read SIXTEEN…PARAGRAPHS…OF CLAPTRAP, before getting to: “As the rope came tight, the number on the digital scale began to climb, 100, 200, 300. It settled at 345 pounds, exceeding the current state record set by John E. Correira, August 14, 2016, weighing 245 pounds at the at the 43 Fathom Bank.”
For grade school children studying the subject in the future, I’ll note that asking an average person from 2022 to read 16 paragraphs on a fish record is like asking someone from the 1930’s to read the Encyclopedia Brittanica
The anonymous Intelligence agent writing the article used the hedging generality “exceeding the current state record” to obfuscate the margin between the records.
That’s another example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
Then I had to do the math to learn that, from 2016 to 2017, the California state record bluefin tuna increased in size by 52%, from 245 pounds to 373 pounds.
I found this in another article: “The behemoth neared the state record of 243 pounds, 11 ounces caught in 1990, according to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Experts estimated the gaffs and stay in an iced-down “kill bag” likely cost the tuna 15 or more pounds overnight.”
In July 2018, USA Today’s David Strege said “Massive bluefin tuna is a new Florida fishing record”.
Where the largest bluefin tuna ever caught in the history of fishing in Florida is walked back to merely “massive”.
Did you notice how author David Strege deviously walked “state record” back to “fishing record”?
The article goes on to say "The catch of an 826-pound, 8-ounce bluefin tuna off Destin, Florida, has been been approved as a state record.
Sitting on fish records for as long as possible before approving them is one of the key techniques used by the folks in charge to blunt and defray insight into the sudden, exponential increases in fish size that are being documented regardless of species or geography. That’s why the article goes on to say “The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission announced the approval on Tuesday, more than a year after the catch was made by Rick Whitley aboard the vessel, You Never Know.”
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those many variants is “uncertain”.
That’s why the article goes on to say “It’s uncertain why the approval process took so long”.
The article goes on to say “The Atlantic bluefin tuna are typically caught farther north, and Whitley’s catch in May of 2017 fills a vacant category for the species in Florida”.
That’s Mil-speak for “the etheric environment in the waters off Florida has improved in health to a point where the bluefin tuna can once again manifest there.”
Can you see how there’s no mention, specifically, as to why bluefin tuna are typically caught farther north?
That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
The article goes on to say “While it was a massive specimen, Atlantic bluefin tuna grow much larger. The International Game Fish Assn. lists as the all-tackle world record a 1,496-pound bluefin tuna caught in 1979 off Nova Scotia, Canada.”
Where, once again, the largest bluefin tuna ever caught in the history of fishing in Florida was walked back to merely “massive”.
Then the doll of the world record is shaken, to make you think this one in Florida is small.
In September 2021, wonews.com said "Potential California State Record Bluefin Landed at 395/4 pounds.
Where, under the false guise of familiarity, the Intelligence operative labeled “wonews staff” omitted the word “tuna”, to make the subject far less searchable. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
Where “landed” implies that tuna just as huge as this were swimming out there, all along, only no one had fished for them with the proper assiduousness, previously.
(The largest bluefin tuna ever caught in California, 2021, almost sixty percent larger than a previous California state record holder from 1990)
After six…paragraphs…of claptrap, the author finally coughs up the data:
“On their way in, they took measurements of the fish and calculated it out to be around 435 pounds. Floyd called Bob Vanian from 976-BITE to get ahold of someone with a certified scale. Ending up at the San Diego Marlin Club, they were able to weigh the fish with witnesses and get a certified receipt printed with its weight: 395.4 pounds — likely a new California state record with the standing record at the time of the catch at 384 pounds.”
For grade schoolers researching this in the future, making an average person from 2021 read six paragraphs about a fish record would be the equivalent of making someone from 1930 read the Bible cover to cover. The curiously-unnamed author of the article used them in a propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”, or “harrying the opposition”.
Did you notice how that author omitted the date of the previous record, along with whomever set it? That’s another example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The weights of the old and new record holders are provided, but the far more impactful, specific percentage increase between the records is carefully withheld. That’s another example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
I had to research a separate article to learn that “The existing State of California record bluefin is a 384-pound fish that was caught in October of 2020 while fishing around San Clemente Island.”
Then I had to look up yet another article to learn that “According to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, the current record-holder for bluefin tuna is Kevin Scully, who hooked a 269-pound, 11-ounce fish in San Diego County in 2016”.
Then I had to do the math to learn that, from 2017 to 2020, the California state record bluefin tuna increased in size by 2.9% , from 373 pounds to 384 pounds.
Then I had to do the math yet again to learn that, from 2020 to 2021, the California state record bluefin tuna increased in size by 3%, from 384 pounds to 395.4 pounds.
Wait, what? Here, again, we see a larger rate of growth from 2020 to 2021 than we did from 2017 to 2020. The growth rate of the bluefin tuna in California is once again increasing, going forward in time.
That’s not supposed to be scientifically possibly, at least according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms grown in ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size, and, further that there is “no such thing as the ether”.
They’re desperate to keep you from recognizing that the size, fertility, longevity, and very existence of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.
In May 2022, ksat.com said “South Texas fisherman lands state record bluefin tuna off Port Aransas coast”.
Where “landed” implies that tuna just as huge as this were swimming out there, all along, only no one had fished for them with the proper assiduousness, previously.
The author is Sam Lungren from themeateater.com. The latter is a thinly-veiled reference to cannibalism.
The subhead reads “The 876-pound tuna took nine hours to reel in”.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those many variants is “amazed”. That’s why the article goes on to say:
“Scientists with the Center for Sportfish Science and Conservation, located at the Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, were called to collect samples from the “amazing catch” pending verification of a state record.”
The article goes on to say “The center announced on April 30 that the tuna broke the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department record that was set 36 years ago by almost 70 pounds.”
Where author Sam Lungren put the hedging generality “by almost 70 pounds” in place of the far more impactful percentage increase between the records. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
As a bonus, Sam also omitted the weight of the previous record holder, and the name of the person who caught it, and then made me do the math to learn the year. Those are all examples of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
That means that the previous record was set in 1986.
Despite the fact that Mr. Lungren loves him some writing about fish because it is, in fact, his job, he hid the current record holder’s weight way up in the subhead, where you’d forget it, and then, in journalistic parlance, “buried” his hedging generality “by almost seventy pounds” way, way down here in the body text, to make you figuring out the margin between the records virtually impossible. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
If we use “69 pounds” for "almost 70 pounds, and then tortuously do the math, we learn that, from 1986 to 2022, the Texas state record bluefin tuna increased in size by 8.5%, from 807 pounds to 876 pounds.
In a facebook post, the Center for Sportfish Science and Conservation said “We’re sure this record will stand for a long time but are sure folks are out there trying to break it already.”
That’s a careful bit of tradecraft, where the Illuminist shill science talking head prepares you for the next, exponentially larger bluefin tuna in Texas, which you can explain away with “greater fishing assiduousness”.
The article goes on to say "The Fisherman’s Wharf called it an ‘absolutely a once-in-a-lifetime catch’.”
Where an Illuminist-controlled business quoted in a mainstream news publication fights a furious rearguard action against the wider awareness that bluefin tuna records are being broken by huge margins regardless of geography.
The damage control continues: "The 19-year-old tuna was among the second processed by the Sportfish Center this year: a 23-year-old, 706-pound bluefin tuna was also caught off of Port Aransas, this one aboard the Dolphin Express of Dolphin Docks.
Tim Oestrich, captain of the Dolphin Express, told the center it was the first bluefin tuna he’d ever landed. ‘We only have a window of about 3-4 weeks, and the weather’s got to line up and the people have to line up,’ he told the center. According to the center, only a handful of blue tunas are allowed to be taken in season each year from the Gulf of Mexico."
Where “are allowed to be taken” is a bald-faced lie. The artificially short season and the water temperature are the keys.
"These fish are a real treasure and very rare, with only 4-6 per year caught and retained,” Sportfish Center Director Dr. Greg Stunz said. “Working with anglers allows us to get samples from these fish that would otherwise not be possible.”
Can you see how the record was set in April? The water in the Gulf of Mexico is still cold in April, but rapidly warming up. They’ve made sure to put the bluefin tuna season in a position where those bluefins are already heading out to colder water. It gives the artificial impression that the bluefin tuna is “rare” in the gulf of Mexico.
The sudden rush of tuna catches in the Gulf of Mexico shows that the water there is cooling, and that the etheric environment there is improving.
Throwing out fish records based upon technicalities is one of the key techniques used by the folks in charge to blunt and defray insight into the sudden, exponential increases in fish size that are being documented regardless of species or geography.
That’s why a brobible.com article from April 2022 reads “Massive 832-Pound Bluefin Tuna Breaks Florida Fishing Record But Misses Record Book Due To Technicality”.
Where the largest bluefin tuna ever caught in the history of fishing in Florida is walked back to merely “massive”. It’s the exact same verbiage that David Strege used in his headline that we just reviewed from 2018.
Did you notice how author Cass Anderson deviously walked “state record” back to “fishingrecord”, just as David Strege did in the article we just reviewed from two years previously?
Since we live in the middle ages, and most readers will grasp any straw to remain off the hook of personal responsibility, I’m going to have to list them here, again:
July 2018 - Massive bluefin tuna is a new Florida fishing record
April 2022 - Massive 832-Pound Bluefin Tuna Breaks Florida Fishing Record
Same headline, different Intelligence operative. Same propaganda, different year, regardless of culture or geography. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon and before.
The April 2022 article goes on to say "The existing Florida state fishing record for Bluefin Tuna has stood in place since May 2017 and that fish was caught by a single angler while no ‘angler’ is listed for the new record-setting tuna. In order for a fishing record to be certified it needs to have been caught by one fisherman. Here the listed angler is “whole team”, meaning that everyone on the boat took turns fighting the fish. "
Wait, what? They’re not allowed to fix the application, and list one name, and get the record? Nope. That’s an example of what is known as a Great Big Conspiracy.
Then agent Anderon spewed three paragraphs of claptrap before providing the data:
“The existing state fishing record in Florida for Bluefin Tuna is an 826.5-pound fish caught by angler Rick Whitley. According to For The Win, Whitley was also fishing out of Destin, Florida and that fish was caught back on May 8, 2017.”
Putting paragraph after paragraph in between the old record and the new is an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The omission of the far more impactful margin between the records is yet another example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
So, I had to do the math to learn that, from 2017 to 2022, the largest tuna ever caught in the history of fishing in Florida increased by .66%, from 826.5 pounds to 832 pounds.
(The largest bluefin tuna ever caught in the history of fishing in Florida, 2022. Bluefin tuna suddenly appeared in Florida waters in 2017 for some unexplained reason. The reason it’s unexplained is that the etheric environment in Florida once again improved in health to a point where the bluefin tuna could manifest there).
Jeff Miller, Honolulu, HI, April 25, 2022
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
