“Therefore every age has some secret left for its discovery, and who knows but this intercourse betwixt the two kinds of rational inhabitants of the same earth may be not only believed shortly but be as freely entertained and as well known as now the art of navigation, printing, gunning, riding on saddles with stirrups, and the discoveries of microscopes which were sometimes as great a wonder and as hard to be believed”.
From “The Secret Commonwealth, of Elves, Fauns and Fairies”, by Robert Kirk, written in 1691, and not published until 1815
THE DATA
From 2000 to 2022, international alcohol consumption decreased by 10% , from 47.6% to 43%.
The Christian Science Monitor’s Sarah Miller Llana omitted the percentage, and described it as "by almost 5 percentage points " as a hedge against the larger and far more impactful statistic which I was forced to do the math to learn.
From 2000 to 2012, alcohol consumption among 15- to 16-year-olds in Sweden decreased by at least 51%.
Despite being a scientist by trade, first author Jukka Torronen’s study in a prestigiuous journal said, only-generally, “by more than 50%”.
From 2000 to 2012, alcohol abstention rates among boys and girls in Sweden increased by 70%, from 30% to 51%.
Despite being a scientist by trade, first author Jukka Torronen’s study in a prestigious journal provided only the figures, and omitted the percentage increase.
From 2000 to 2012, heavy episodic drinking among boys in Sweden decreased by 47%, from 34% to 18%.
Despite being a scientist by trade, first author Jukka Torronen’s study in a prestigious journal omitted the percentage decrease for boys, and omitted Swedish girls, entirely.
From 2005 to 2016, Russian per capita alcohol consumption decreased by 37%, from 18.7 liters to 11.7 liters.
The Christian Science Monitor’s Sarah Miller Llana omitted the percentage.
From 2005 to 2016, annual European per capita alcohol consumption decreased by 24%, from 12.5 liters to 9.5 liters.
Earlier in the article, the Christian Science Monitor’s Sarah Miller Llana had said “Drinking is down significantly in some regions, particularly in Europe, which has seen a 10 percentage point decrease in the percentage of drinkers, with Russia and former Soviet bloc countries largely driving the numbers down.”
I’m guessing you noticed how, once again, she used the smaller “10 percentage point decrease” as a hedge against the far larger and far more impactful percentage decrease in drinkers which she obfuscated entirely.
And that hedge was a setup for the omission of even larger and even more impactful decrease in drinking in Europe overall, which, in journalistic parlance, she “buried” in a separate table below.
The people who do this sort of a thing for a living call it “Tradecraft”.
THE ARTICLES
On October 3, 2018, the Christian Science Monitor explained “Culture shift: What’s behind a decline in drinking worldwide”.
Where author Sarah Miller Llana used the general “decline in drinking” because, as a propagandist, she knows that seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and her hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the speed and scope of the decrease in international alcohol consumption, which, in journalistic parlance, she’s “buried” in the body text below.
After several paragraphs of claptrap designed to shake off the reader, we get to “Since 2000, the number of drinkers in the world has decreased by almost 5 percentage points, from 47.6 to 43.0, according to the World Health Organization (WHO).”
Where Sarah used “by almost 5 percentage points” as a hedge against the far-larger and far more impactful statistic which I was forced to do the math to learn. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
From 2000 to 2022, international alcohol consumption decreased by 10%, from 47.6% to 43%. The Christian Science Monitor’s Sarah Miller Llana omitted the percentage, and described it as “by almost 5 percentage points”.
Using a time-honored propaganda technique, the Christian Science Monitor’s Sara Miller Llana “buried” this information in a table lower in the article. She presented only the numbers - I had to do the math to learn the percentages:
From 2005 to 2016, annual European per capita alcohol consumption decreased by 24%, from 12.5 liters to 9.5 liters.
Earlier in the article, the Christian Science Monitor’s Sarah Miller Llana had said “Drinking is down significantly in some regions, particularly in Europe, which has seen a 10 percentage point decrease in the percentage of drinkers, with Russia and former Soviet bloc countries largely driving the numbers down.”
I’m guessing you noticed how, once again, she used the smaller “10 percentage point decrease” as a hedge against the far larger and far more impactful percentage decrease in drinkers which she obfuscated entirely.
And that hedge was a setup for the omission of even larger and even more impactful decrease in drinking in Europe overall, which she buried in a separate table below.
The people who do this sort of a thing for a living call it “Tradecraft”.
The article goes on to say “According to WHO figures, per capita consumption decreased from 18.7 liters in 2005 to 11.7 liters in 2016.”
Where Sarah omitted the word “Russia”, and also omitted the far more impactful percentage decrease which I was, once again, forced to do the math to learn. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
From 2005 to 2016, Russian per capita alcohol consumption decreased by 37%, from 18.7 liters to 11.7 liters. The Christian Science Monitor’s Sarah Miller Llana omitted the percentage.
Here’s Sarah Miller Llana’s picture, in a Satanic purple top, against a Satanic green background, looking left:
[image]
(The Christian Science Monitor’s Sarah Miller Llana, in a Satanic purple top, against a Satanic green background, with the photo taken slightly off center so that her left eye is the focal point of the image. As a bonus, she’s looking left. To followers of the Left-hand path, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or “the eye of Horus”. Sarah figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.)
I have included her photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
In February 2019, the International Journal of Drug Policy published first author Jukka Torronen’s “Why are young people drinking less than earlier? Identifying and specifying social mechanisms with a pragmatist approach”.
Where author Jukka Torronen used the general “drinking less than earlier” because, as a propagandist, he knows that seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and his hedging generalities go a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the speed and scope of the decrease in international alcohol consumption, which, in journalistic parlance, he’s “buried” in the body text below.
I’m guessing that you noticed the sleight-of-hand that career scientist Jukka Torronen used to pull an international decrease in alchohol consumption among all age groups back to merely young people in Sweden. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The article goes on to say “For instance, alcohol consumption among 15- to 16-year-olds has fallen more than 50% between 2000 and 2012 (Norström & Svensson, 2014). At the same time, the abstention rates among boys and girls have increased from about 30% to more than 50% (Leifman et al., 2011). Moreover, heavy episodic drinking has decreased from 34% to 18% among boys (ibid.).”
Where Mr. Torronen said “has fallen more than 50%” because “fallen” is softer than “dropped” or “decreased”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer.
[image]
(The Fall of Lucifer, from “Paradise Lost”, by John Milton, 1667)
Despite being a scientist by trade, Jukka used the only-general “more than 50%” - twice! - and, in journalistic parlance, “buried” the actual percentages in separate links. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
From 2000 to 2012, alcohol consumption among 15- to 16-year-olds in Sweden decreased by at least 51%. Despite being a scientist by trade, first author Jukka Torronen said, only-generally, “by more than 50%”.
From 2000 to 2012, alcohol abstention rates among boys and girls in Sweden increased by 70%, from 30% to 51%. Despite being a scientist by trade, first author Jukka Torronen provided only the figures, and omitted the percentage increase.
From 2000 to 2012, heavy episodic drinking among boys in Sweden decreased by 47%, from 34% to 18%. Despite being a scientist by trade, for some reason, first author Jukka Torronen omitted the percentage decrease for boys, and omitted Swedish girls, entirely.
You’ve been conditioned to think that this is what an evil scientist looks like:
[image]
(Joseph Wiseman as “Dr. Julius No”, from “Dr. No”, 1962. Take note that the photo editor has positioned the image so that Wiseman’s left eye is the focal point of the image. That’s because, to Illuminists, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or “the eye of Horus”.)
While this is, in fact, what an evil scientist actually looks like…here’s a picture of Stockholm University’s Jukka Torronen, in a Satanic green t-shirt:
[image]
(Stockholm University’s Jukka Torronen, in a Satanic green t-shirt, with the photo taken slightly off-center to feature his left eye. To followers of the Left-hand path like Jukka, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or “the eye of Horus”. He figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery)
I have included his photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
In his hit-piece in the International Journal of Drug Policy, the esteemed Professor at the major University assures us that it is “social mechanisms” which have led to the sudden, exponential decreases in alcohol consumption among the young in Sweden, and that he has, gloriously, divined that fact “with a pragmatist approach”.
He’s a shill for the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy of mean-spirited Western materialism, which holds that “there is no such thing as the ether”.
Shill - noun - an accomplice of a hawker, gambler, or swindler who acts as an enthusiastic customer to entice or encourage others.
He and the rest of his rotten ilk are desperate to keep you from recognizing that moral and mental health vary directly with that of the subject’s etheric environment.
Jeff Miller, Libertyville, IL, December 27, 2022
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
