From 2006 to 2022, the Washington state record tiger trout increased in size by 338%, or well more than quadrupled in size, from 6.26 pounds to 27.42 pounds

“In Oceania at the present day, Science, in the old sense, has almost ceased to exist… The empirical method of thought, on which all the scientific achievements of the past were founded, is opposed to the most fundamental principles of Ingsoc. And even technological progress only happens when its products can in some way be used for the diminution of human liberty.”

From “1984”, by George Orwell, 1949

THE DATA

From 1978 to 2022, the world record tiger trout increased in size by 32%, from 20 pounds, 13 ounces to 27.42 pounds.

The record stood unbroken for over forty years, and then was suddenly broken by an exponential margin.

From some obfuscated prior date and 2022, the Utah spearfishing state record striped bass "nearly tripled in size", from some obfuscated weight to 6 pounds, 3 ounces.

The uncredited author from redrockadventure.com omitted the percentage of the margin between the old record and the new, along with the weight of the previous record holder, who set it, and when.

From 2006 to 2022, the Washington state record tiger trout increased in size by 338%, or well more than quadrupled in size, from 6.26 pounds to 27.42 pounds.

From 2006 to 2008, the Washington state record tiger trout increased in size by 119%, or more than doubled in size, from 6.26 pounds to 13.75 pounds.

That’s an average annual increase in size of 59.5% per year over each of those two years.

From some obfuscated date prior to 2007 and 2013, the Utah state record tiger trout increased in size by 141%, or well more than doubled in size, from 7 pounds, 9 ounces to 18 pounds, 4 ounces.

From some obfuscated date prior to 2007 to 2012, the Utah state record tiger trout increased in size by 98%, or doubled in size, from 7 pounds, 9 ounces to 15 pounds

From some obfuscated prior date to 2007 to 2007, the Utah state record tiger trout increased in size by 42%, from 7 lbs., 9 ounces to 10 pounds, 12 ounces

From 2007 to 2012, the Utah state record tiger trout increased in size by 40%, from 10 pounds, 12 ounces to 15 pounds.

The uncredited author from carsonow.com omitted the percentage, and obfuscated margin with the only-general “by almost five pounds.”

That’s an average annual increase in size of 8% per year over each of those five years.

From 2008 to 2012, the Washington state record tiger trout increased in size by 9% , from 13.75 pounds to 15.04 pounds.

That’s an average annual increase in size of 2.25% per year over each of those four years.

From 2012 to 2015, the Washington state record tiger trout increased in size by 23%, from 15.04 pounds to 18.49 pounds.

That’s an average annual increase in size of 7.6% per year over each of those three years.

The 7.6% average annual increase in size of the Washington state record tiger trout from 2012 to 2015 is statistically identical to the 8% average annual increase in size of the Utah state record tiger trout from 2007 to 2012.

Tiger trout are increasing exponentially in size at the same rate regardless of geograpy.

From 2012 to 2013, the Utah state record tiger trout increased in size by 22%, from 15 pounds to 18 pounds, 4 ounces.

From 2012 to 2013, the Utah state record tiger trout increased in length by 1.6%, from 32.25 inches to 32.75 inches.

The 7.6% average annual increase in size of the Washington state record tiger trout from 2012 to 2015 is 237% greater, or well more than triple the 2.25% average annual increase in size documented in the species there from 2008 to 2012.

The growth rate of the Washington state record tiger trout is increasing exponentially, going forward in time. That’s not scientifically possible, at least not according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms increase in ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size.

The truth is that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism vary directly with the health of its etheric environment.

The Salt Lake Tribune’s Brett Prettyman omitted the statistics, and used the lurid-but general “monster trout” and “shattered the record” obfuscate the margin between the old record and the new.

The 22% increase in size of the Utah state record tiger trout from 2012 to 2013 is 175% greater, or heading toward triple the 8% average annual increase in size documented in the species there from 2007 to 2012.

The growth rate of the Utah state record tiger trout is increasing exponentially, going forward in time. That’s not scientifically possible, at least not according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms increase in ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size.

The truth is that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism vary directly with the health of its etheric environment.

From 2013 to 2018, the longest tiger trout ever caught and released in Utah increased in length by 2% , from 29 inches to 29 5/8 inches.

from 2015 to 2021, the Washington state record tiger trout increased in size by 32%, from 18.49 pounds to 24.49 pounds.

That’s an average annual increase in size of 6.4% per year over each of those six years.

The uncredited author from chronline.com walked the largest tiger trout ever caught in Washington back to merely “massive”, and omitted the statistic documenting the margin between the records.

They’re desperate to keep you from recognizing that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.

From 2021 to 2022, the Washington State record tiger trout increased in size by 12% , from 24.5 pounds to 27.42 pounds.

The 12% increase in size of the Washington state record tiger trout from 2021 to 2022 is 87% greater, or close to double the 6.4% average annual increase in size documented in the species there from 2015 to 2021.

The growth rate of the Washington state record tiger trout is increasing exponentially, going forward in time. That’s not scientifically possible, at least not according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms increase in ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size.

The truth is that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism vary directly with the health of its etheric environment.

THE ARTICLES

On June 23, 2022, redrockadventure.com said “New Utah Fishing Records 2022”.

Where the uncredited author omitted the word “state” from “state record”, to make the subject far less searchable. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

Under the false guise of efficient journalism, the uncredited author wrote a story about only-generally-identified “fishing records” so that there’d be no searchable fish name in the title. That’s another example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

For those late to the party, anytime an author is uncredited, it is proof that said author is an Intelligence operative.

Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, these techniques go a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the scope and speed of the exponential increase in size that is being seen at this time among fish regardless of species or geography.

The article goes on to say "Utah Division of Wildlife Resources reported these new fishing records in a post on June 23, 2022:

:fishing_pole_and_fish: Darvil McBride from Hesperia, California caught a spearfishing record striped bass from Lake Powell on April 30, 2022. It weighed 6 pounds and 3 ounces!

:fishing_pole_and_fish: David MacKay from Farmington caught and released a record tiger trout from Fish Lake on May 6, 2022. It was a little over 29 inches long!

:fishing_pole_and_fish: Draygen Picklesimer from Hurricane caught and released a record black crappie at Quail Creek State Park on April 18, 2022. It was over 16 inches long."

Did you notice that there’s no mention as to what the previous records were, or who set them, or when, or, heaven forfend, the margin between the records? Those are all example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

So, I had to research another undated, uncredited article, from kolomkabir.com, headlined “PHOTOS: Spearfishers shoot thousands of fish from Lake Powell”.

Did you notice that the uncredited author omitted the name of the state, to make the subject far less searchable? That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

I guessing you also may have noticed that the curiously-uncredited author wrote the headline in a way where you can’t tell it contains a spearfishing state record striped bass. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

You have to scroll down an unbelievable 19 paragraphs to get to “Darvil McBride debuted with a Utah-recorded striped bass after he released it on the second day of competition on Saturday, April 30, 2022. His 6-pound 3-ounce bass nearly tripled the state record for a striped bass release on shaft. Evan Frost”.

For grade school children in the future taking notes, asking someone from 2022 to read 19 paragraphs on spearfishing is like asking someone from the 1920’s to read “War and Peace”.

Did you notice that the uncredited author used the only-general “nearly tripled the state record”, in place documenting who set it, and when, and what the margin between the records was? That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

For those late to the party, anytime an author is uncredited, it is proof that said author is an Intelligence operative.

Here’s a picture of the fish:

Spearfishing Lake Powell.

(Darvil McBride with the new Utah spearfishing state record striped bass, from 2022 - it’s nearly three times the size of the previous record holder, from some obfuscated prior date.)

The record prior to 2022 has been scrubbed from the web. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

So, all we know is that, from some obfuscated prior date and 2022, the Utah spearfishing state record striped bass nearly tripled in size, from some obfuscated weight to 6 pounds, 3 ounces.

The uncredited author from redrockadventure.com used the only-general “a little over 29 inches” so that I couldn’t do the math on the current record holder. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

The article goes on to say “Draygen Picklesimer from Hurricane caught and released a record black crappie at Quail Creek State Park on April 18, 2022. It was over 16 inches long.”

The record prior to 2022 has been scrubbed from the web. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

On February 18, 2018, wideopenspaces.com said “Angler Lands Utah’s C&R Record Tiger Trout, Forgoes Title to Protect Fishery”.

Did you notice how author Justin Hoffman used the false guise of familiarity to say “C&R”, instead of “catch and release”? He wanted to make the subject less searchable. It’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

Justin went on to say "Erin’s tiger trout measured 29 5/8 inches, which would’ve eclipsed the previous catch-and-release record, a 29-inch fish from 2013.

Where the word “eclipsed” is only-general. It implies that the one record just exceeded the other, and is also a thinly-veiled reference to the eclipses which are the most favored times for Illuminist human sacrifices.

So, I had to do the math to learn that, from 2013 to 2018, the longest tiger trout ever caught and released in Utah increased in length by 2%, from 29 inches to 29 5/8 inches.

On March 5, 2012, carsonnow.org said “Utah angler catches record tiger trout”.

Where the uncredited author omitted the word “state” from “state record” to make the subject far less searchable. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

For those late to the party, anytime an author is uncredited, it is proof that said author is an Intelligence operative.

The article goes on to say “Last week — after a day of fishing at Scofield Reservoir in central Utah—an excited Trent Peery dropped by the Division of Wildlife Resources’ office in Springville. A resident of Santaquin, Peery stopped by the office to ask fisheries biologists to measure a gigantic tiger trout he caught earlier that day.”

Where the largest tier trout ever caught in the history of the state of Utah is walked back to merely “gigantic”.

The article goes on to say “Peery was hoping the trout would break the existing Utah state record held by Michael Moon. In 2007, Moon caught a tiger trout that measured 29-1/2 inches and weighed 10 pounds, 12 ounces. The fish had a girth measurement of 17-1/8 inches. He caught the tiger in Palisade Reservoir just south of Manti.”

Here the author has planted the false impression that the 2012 catch wasn’t a record.

The article goes on to say “After Regional Aquatic Manager Mike Slater measured Peery’s fish, Peery’s hope was realized—his tiger trout not only beat the state record, its weight smashed it! Peery’s fish measured 32-1/4 inches long and weighed 15 pounds. The fish had a girth measurement of 20 inches.”

The curiously-uncredited author used the general “beat” and the lurid-but-still-only-general “smashed” to obfuscate the margin between the records. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

The photo caption reads "Photo: Trent Peery of Santaquin, Utah shows the tiger trout he caught at Scofield Reservoir in Utah in mid February. The huge fish was more than 32 inches long. It weighed a whopping 15 pounds.

It is the new state record and broke the old state record for a tiger trout by almost five pounds."

The curiously-uncredited author used the only-general “by almost five pounds” to obfuscate the margin between the records. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

So, I had to do the math to learn that, from 2007 to 2012, the Utah state record tiger trout increased in size by 40%, from 10 pounds, 12 ounces to 15 pounds.

The uncredited author from carsonow.com omitted the statistic, and described the margin as “by almost five pounds.”

In March 2013, sltrib.com said “New Utah State Record Tiger Trout Caught at Scofield Reservoir - It’s Over 18 Pounds

Where author Brett Prettyman used the only-general “it’s over 18 pounds” as a hand-waving distraction from the margin between the old record and the new.

Brett knows that, since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, his hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the speed and scope of the exponential increase in size taking place in fish regardless of species or geography.

He’s desperate to keep you from recognizing that the size, fertllity, longevity and very existence of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.

The article goes on to say “The monster trout, officially weighed and measured today by a DWR fisheries biologist at the Springville office, shattered the record set last year, tipping the scales at 18 pounds and four ounces. The tiger, a hybrid between a brook and a brown trout, was 32 3/4 inches long and caught by Chris Nilson of Benjamin. The record will be verified by the Salt Lake office soon. The standing record, a 15-pound and 32 1/4 inch trout, was caught by Trent Peery was caught on Feb. 16, 2012.”

Where the lurid-but general “monster trout” and “shattered the record” obfuscate the margin between the old record and the new. Brett used “tipping the scales” to minimize, and imply that the new record just surpassed the old. Those are all examples of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

So, I had to do the math to learn that, from 2012 to 2013, the Utah state record tiger trout increased in size by 22%, from 15 pounds to 18 pounds, 4 ounces.

From 2012 to 2013, the Utah state record tiger trout increased in length by 1.6%, from 32.25 inches to 32.75 inches.

The Salt Lake Tribune’s Brett Prettyman omitted the statistics, and used the lurid-but general “monster trout” and “shattered the record” obfuscate the margin between the old record and the new.

He’s desperate to keep you from recognizing that the size, fertllity, longevity and very existence of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.

In 2007, bigfishtackle.com’s forum administrator, wiperhunter2, said " the old record was caught on the Boulder mountains and was 27 inches and weighed 7 lbs-9 ozs."

Can you see how they carefully omitted who set it, and when? One of the hardest things for practicing Coincidence theorists to get their heads around is that every web forum on Earth has been coopted by generational Satanist co-conspirators.

Another poster said “It was caught today, 3/24/2007, by Michael Moon of Ephraim, UT. It was 29.5 inches long and weighed in at 10.73 pounds (10 lbs 12 oz). It was weighed on the certified scales at Kent’s Market in Ephraim.”

The 2007 record holder has been otherwise scrubbed from the web.

So all we know is that, from some obfuscated prior date to 2007, the Utah state record tiger trout increased in size by 42%, from 7 lbs., 9 ounces to 10 pounds, 12 ounces.

The 22% increase in size of the Utah state record tiger trout from 2012 to 2013 is 175% greater, or heading toward triple the 8% average annual increase in size documented in the species there from 2007 to 2012.

The growth rate of the Utah state record tiger trout is increasing exponentially, going forward in time. That’s not scientifically possible, at least not according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms increase in ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size.

STATE, WORLD RECORD TIGER TROUT, WASHINGTON

On August 12, 2022, sportfishingmag.com said “World Record Tiger Trout Caught by Washington State Woman”.

The article goes on to say “The massive fish beat the old tiger trout record by nearly three pounds, bettering the previous top trout caught by her son last year from the same lake.”

Where author Bob McNally walks the largest tiger trout ever caught in all history back to merely “massive”.

He used the general “beat the old record” and “by nearly three pounds” to obfuscate the exponential margin between the records.

The article goes on to say “On certified scales, Clegg’s tiger trout weighed 27.42-pounds, with a 35.5-inch length and 28.125 inch girth.”

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Scientific, Academic and Media establishments wants to lie about well, basically anything. One of those many variants is “astonished”.

That’s why the article goes on to say “It’s astonishing that Caylun Peterson, Clegg’s son, netted her fish, because Peterson is the current state and IGFA All-Tackle World Record holder for tiger trout. His fish was caught from Loon Lake last year on June 21, using a nightcrawler for bait on Loon Lake. Peterson’s trout weighed 24.5 pounds, with a 34.5-inch length, and a 25-inch girth.”

The article goes on to say “His mother’s fish is nearly three pounds heavier, and easily should qualify for a new Washington State record tiger trout, as well as an IGFA All Tackle World Record for the species.”

Where propagandist Bob McNally repeated the only-general “nearly three pounds heavier” to obfuscate the margin between the state records, and then went on to mention nothing about the weight of the previous world record holder, or the margin between the old record and the new. Those are examples of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

So, I had to do the math to learn that, from 2021 to 2022, the Washington State record tiger trout increased in size by 12%, from 24.5 pounds to 27.42 pounds.

On July 9, 2021, chronline.com said “State-Record Tiger Trout Caught in Eastern Washington”.

The uncredited article goes on to say “A massive tiger trout pulled from Loon Lake in Stevens County on June 26 has set a new state record, state fishery managers have confirmed.
The 24.49-pound tiger trout broke the previous record by 6 pounds, according to Bruce Baker, an inland fish biologist with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW).”

For those late the party, anytime an article is uncredited, it is proof that said author is an Intelligence asset.

Did you notice how the curiously-uncredited author didn’t mention who set the previous record, or when it was set, or the margin between the records? Those are all examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.

You have to scroll down a tortuous 13 paragraphs to learn “The previous record for tiger trout was an 18.49-pound fish caught by angler Kelly Flaherty from Bonaparte Lake in Okanogan County on May 6, 2015.”

For grade schoolers studying the subject in the future, asking someone from 2021 to read 13 paragraphs about tiger trout is like asking someone from 1880 to memorize the Declaration of Independence.

I’m guessing that they and you both noticed that the curiously-uncredited author still hasn’t coughed up any information on the margin between the records. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

So, I had to do the math to learn that, from 2015 to 2021, the Washington state record tiger trout increased in size by 32%, from 18.49 pounds to 24.49 pounds.

That’s an average annual increase of 5.3% per year over each of those six years.

The uncredited author from chronline.com walked the largest tiger trout ever caught in Washington back to merely “massive”, and omitted the statistic documenting the margin between the records.

They’re desperate to keep you from recognizing that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.

In June 2015, spokesman.com said “Bonaparte tiger trout likely state record”.

Where, under the false guise of familiarity, author Greg Landers omitted the name of the state, to make the subject far less searchable. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”. For the record, it’s Washington.

The article goes on to say "An 18.49-pound tiger trout caught May 5 from Bonaparte Lake near Tonasket is a pending state record. Kelly Flaherty, 53, of Priest River hooked the lunker 10 feet from shore on what he said was going to be the last cast of a long day of slow fishing.

The fish was weighed on a certified scale an measured by Washington Fish and Wildlife staff at 32.5 inches long with a girth of 21.75 inches, but officials said Friday the record had not yet been officially processed.

If approved, Flaherty’s fish will top the 15.04-pound state record set in 2012 at Roses Lake in Chelan County."

Did you notice how Greg omitted the name of the person who caught the previous record, and also didn’t mention anything about the margin between the records? Well, that is, beyond the terse and only-general “will top the 15.04-pound state record”, which falsely implies that the new record was just a bit larger than the old.

Those are both examples of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

So, I had to do the math to learn that, from 2012 to 2015, the Washington state record tiger trout increased in size by 23%, from 15.04 pounds to 18.49 pounds.

That’s an average annual increase in size of 7.6% per yer over each of those three years.

In May 2012, spokesman.com said “FISHING RECORDS – The 13.75-pound state record tiger trout caught in Spokane County’s Fish Lake on May 27, 2008, by local angler Evan Roda”.

The article is now behind a paywall. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

So, I had to do the math to learn that, from 2008 to 2012, the Washington state record tiger trout increased in size by 9%, from 13.75 pounds to 15.04 pounds.

On June 5, 2008, northwestfishingreports.com’s beerman1981 said “New Record Tiger Trout in Fish Lake”.

Where, under the false guise of familiarity, the author omitted the word “state” from “state record”, and also omitted the name of the state, to make the subject far less searchable. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

One of the hardest things for practicing Coincidence theorists to get their heads around is that every web forum on Earth has been coopted by generational Satanist co-conspirators.

The operative goes on to say “Check out this artical. This man has been hunting for this fish for several years and finally caught it, doubling the previous state record for a tiger trout. I read this in the Yakima Herald today, and there was a picture (it was very impressive), but I can’t track down the picture now. Anyways, worth a read:”

Did you notice how they used the general “doubling the previous state record”, to obfuscate the margin? Then they once again used the false guise of familiarity to omit the name of the state. Then they claimed they lost the picture. Those are all examples of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

There’s another article on spokesman.com, behind a paywall. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”. But, because I own these clowns, I was able to see that it weighted 6.26 pounds, was caught in 2006, on Lenice Lake. Did you notice how the author didn’t mention the name of the person who caught it? That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

Then I had to do the math to learn that, from 2006 to 2008, the Washington state record tiger trout increased in size by 119%, or more than doubled in size, from 6.26 pounds to 13.75 pounds.

That’s an average annual increase in size of 59.5% per year over each of those two years.

WORLD RECORD TIGER TROUT

In March 2021, usatoday.com said "A Nebraska angler set a state record Thursday with the catch of a 6-pound, 13-ounce tiger trout.

Walton “Ed” Moore broke the previous rod-and-reel mark by more than a pound while fishing at Sutherland Reservoir.

For the sake of comparison, the all-tackle world record stands at 20 pounds, 13 ounces. That tiger trout was caught in Wisconsin at Lake Michigan in 1978.

Then I had to use data from another article and do the math to learn that, from 1978 to 2022, the world record tiger trout increased in size by 32%, from 20 pounds, 13 ounces to 27.42 pounds.

Jeff Miller, Libertyville, IL, September 9, 2022

If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]