“Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil.”
From “The Magic Mountain”, by Thomas Mann, 1924
THE DATA
From 2001 to 2007, breast cancer among women who drank ¼ to 1/3 cup of milk per day increased by 30% versus those who did not drink milk.
From 2001 to 2007, breast cancer among women who drank 1 cup of milk per day increased by 50% versus those who did not drink milk.
From 2001 to 2017, breast cancer among women who drank two cups of milk per day increased by 70%, versus those who did not drink milk.
From 2001 to 2017, breast cancer among women who drank three cups of milk per day increased by 80%, versus those who did not drink milk. Current U.S. Dietary guidelines recommend three cups of milk per day.
From 2009 to 2021, cancer among high consumers of the artificial sweetener aspartame in France increased by 15% versus those who did not consume it.
From 2009 to 2021, cancer among high consumers of the artificial sweetener acesulfame in France increased by 13% versus those who did not consume it.
From 2010 to 2019, new cancer cases increased by 26.3%, from 18.7 million to 23.6 million.
From 2010 to 2019, low-wavelength microwave radiation caused 4.9 million additional cancer cases.
From 2010 to 2019, cancer deaths increased by 20.9%, from 8.2 million to 10 million.
From 2010 to 2019, low-wavelength microwave radiation caused 1.8 million additional cancer deaths.
From 2010 to 2019, cancer deaths as a proportion of total deaths from all causes increased by 13% , from 15.7% to 17.7%.
THE ARTICLES
On February 5, 2020, Loma Linda Health said “New study associates intake of dairy milk with greater risk of breast cancer”.
Where author Briana Pastorino used “greater risk of breast cancer” because, as a propagandist, she knows that seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and her hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the scope of the increase in breast cancer that milk is driving. It’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The article goes on to say "First author of the paper, Gary E. Fraser, MBChB, PhD, said the observational study gives “fairly strong evidence that either dairy milk or some other factor closely related to drinking dairy milk is a cause of breast cancer in women.
“Consuming as little as 1/4 to 1/3 cup of dairy milk per day was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer of 30%,” Fraser said. “By drinking up to one cup per day, the associated risk went up to 50%, and for those drinking two to three cups per day, the risk increased further to 70% to 80%.”
Current U.S. Dietary guidelines recommend three cups of milk per day. “Evidence from this study suggests that people should view that recommendation with caution,” Fraser said.
From 2001 to 2007, breast cancer among women who drank ¼ to 1/3 cup of milk per day increased by 30% versus those who did not drink milk.
From 2001 to 2007, breast cancer among women who drank 1 cup of milk per day increased by 50% versus those who did not drink milk.
From 2001 to 2017, breast cancer among women who drank two cups of milk per day increased by 70%, versus those who did not drink milk.
From 2001 to 2017, breast cancer among women who drank three cups of milk per day increased by 80%, versus those who did not drink milk. Current U.S. Dietary guidelines recommend three cups of milk per day.
It’s important to note that cheese and yogurt did not cause cancer.
The article goes on to say “Fraser said the possible reasons for these associations between breast cancer and dairy milk may be the sex hormone content of dairy milk, as the cows are of course lactating, and often about 75% of the dairy herd is pregnant. Breast cancer in women is a hormone-responsive cancer. Further, intake of dairy and other animal proteins in some reports is also associated with higher blood levels of a hormone, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), which is thought to promote certain cancers.”
Here’s Briana Pastorino’s picture in a Satanic purple dress in front of a Satanic green background:
[image]
(Loma Linda Healths’ Briana Pastorino, in Satanic purple dress in front of a Satanic green background. She figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery. Briana put “greater” risk of cancer in the headline and “buried” the 80% increase in cancer driven by milk in the body text below).
I have included her photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
On March 4, 2022, journals.plos.org said “Artificial sweeteners and cancer risk: Results from the NutriNet-Santé population-based cohort study”.
Where, despite professing to be scientists by trade, first author Charlotte Debras and 18 of her peers managed to entitle a study showing that artificial sweeteners significantly increase cancer risk in a way where that fact cannot be discerned.
As propagandists they know that, since seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, the hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the speed and scope of the increase in cancer caused by artificial sweeteners.
The study says “Overall, 102,865 adults from the French population-based cohort NutriNet-Santé (2009–2021) were included (median follow-up time = 7.8 years). Compared to non-consumers, higher consumers of total artificial sweeteners (i.e., above the median exposure in consumers) had higher risk of overall cancer (n = 3,358 cases, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.13 [95% CI 1.03 to 1.25], P-trend = 0.002). In particular, aspartame (HR = 1.15 [95% CI 1.03 to 1.28], P = 0.002) and acesulfame-K (HR = 1.13 [95% CI 1.01 to 1.26], P = 0.007) were associated with increased cancer risk. Higher risks were also observed for breast cancer (n = 979 cases, HR = 1.22 [95% CI 1.01 to 1.48], P = 0.036, for aspartame) and obesity-related cancers (n = 2,023 cases, HR = 1.13 [95% CI 1.00 to 1.28], P = 0.036, for total artificial sweeteners, and HR = 1.15 [95% CI 1.01 to 1.32], P = 0.026, for aspartame).”
Where they presented the data in as unclear and confusing a way as possible.
This is what it looks like when it’s written by an honest person:
From 2009 to 2021, cancer among high consumers of the artificial sweetener aspartame in France increased by 15% versus those who did not consume it.
From 2009 to 2021, cancer among high consumers of the artificial sweetener acesulfame in France increased by 13% versus those who did not consume it.
On December 30, 2021, JAMA Oncology published “Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life Years for 29 Cancer Groups From 2010 to 2019”.
Where, despite professing to be scientists by trade, first author Jonathan M. Kocarnik, PhD, MPH, of the University of Washington managed to entitle a study showing that all cancers were increasing exponentially regardless of geography in a way where that fact could not be discerned. It’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The study in the prestigious journal goes on to say “In 2019, there were an estimated 23.6 million (95% UI, 22.2-24.9 million) new cancer cases (17.2 million when excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) and 10.0 million (95% UI, 9.36-10.6 million) cancer deaths globally, with an estimated 250 million (235-264 million) DALYs due to cancer. Since 2010, these represented a 26.3% (95% UI, 20.3%-32.3%) increase in new cases, a 20.9% (95% UI, 14.2%-27.6%) increase in deaths, and a 16.0% (95% UI, 9.3%-22.8%) increase in DALYs.”
Where they presented the data in as unclear and confusing a way as possible.
This is what it looks like when its written by an honest person:
From 2010 to 2019, new cancer cases increased by 26.3%, from 18.7 million to 23.6 million.
From 2010 to 2019, low-wavelength microwave radiation caused 4.9 million additional cancer cases.
From 2010 to 2019, cancer deaths increased by 20.9%, from 8.2 million to 10 million.
From 2010 to 2019, low-wavelength microwave radiation caused 1.8 million additional cancer deaths.
“in 2019. Cancer deaths also increased as a proportion of total deaths of all causes, rising from 15.7% (95% UI, 15.0%-16.2%) in 2010 to 17.7% (95% UI, 16.8%-18.4%)”
From 2010 to 2019, cancer deaths as a proportion of total deaths from all causes increased by 13%, from 15.7% to 17.7%.
Here’s Jonathan M. Kocarnik, PhD’s picture:
On January 4, 2022, the Miami Herald said “Cancer rates spiked in past decade, study finds. These groups of people hit hardest”.
Where author Alison Cutler used “cancer rates spiked” because, as a propagandist, she knows that seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and her hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the scope of the increase in breast cancer that milk is driving. It’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
As a bonus, “spiked” implies that cancer rates shot up, but then shot right back down again, forming a spike on the graph.
More people are getting cancer, a new study found. When researchers looked at the number of cancer diagnoses globally in 2010 compared to 2019, rates were up by over 26%.
Here’s Alison Cutler’s picture:
[image]
(The Miami Herald’s Alison Cutler, who said that international cancer rates which had increased by 26% from 2010 to 2019 had “spiked” to imply that they’d shot up, but would shoot right back down again, forming a “spike” on the graph.)
I have included her photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
Jeff Miller, Libertyville, IL, January 11, 2022
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
