“First, then, the sky and lands and sheets of water,
The bright moon’s globe, the Titan sun and stars,
Are fed within by Spirit, and a Mind
Infused through all the members of the world
Makes one great living body of the mass.
From Spirit come the races of man and beast,
The life of birds, odd creatures of the deep sea
Contains beneath her sparkling surfaces,
And fiery energy from a heavenly source
Belongs to the generative seeds of these,
So far as they are not poisoned or clogged
By mortal bodies, their free essence dimmed
by earthiness and deathliness of flesh.”
From “The Aeneid”, book VI, by Virgil, 30 B.C.
This is the first time that I have connected longevity and fertility.
It is part of a larger Longevity document which you’ll see shortly, which will, in turn, be integrated into "The Etheric Origin of Species, and Microwave Radiation as a Driver of Their Extinction.
From 1963 to 2007, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by an annual average of 241.4 pairs.
From 1963 to 2007, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by an annual average of 58.5%.
From 1963 to 2007, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 2,574.5%, or by more than twenty six times, or by 10,623 pairs, from 417 to 11,040.
This is a hyper-exponential, historically-unprecedented increase which cannot be explained by conventional Biology.
Here, even the most committed Coincidence theorist must admit that only-generally-described “conservation efforts”, or “banning DDT” cannot have created such an increase.
Make no mistake, DDT did, indeed, decimate bird populations in the United States, as it was designed to do.
However the banning of that substance did not cause the hyper-exponential, historically-unprecedented increase in the bald eagle population in the United States from 1963 to 2007.
There are supposed to be honest bird scientists out there who could and would do the math, saying that those original 417 pairs would have had an average number of X chicks, with a mortality rate of Y, and a reproductive rate of Z", etc., for a theoretical maximum population in 2007 of A.
I can assure you that it would not be 11,040.
If I get time, I’ll figure it out myself, and add it to this data.
From 1963 to 2006, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 9,323 pairs.
From 1963 to 2006, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by an annual average of 52%.
From 1963 to 2006, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 2,235.7%, or by more than twenty times, or by 9,323 pairs, from 417 to 9,740.
From 1963 to 1964, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average), in just one year.
This is a hyper-exponential, historically-unprecedented increase in the eagle population which cannot be explained by conventional Biology.
In 1963, per an uncredited author from the Center For Biological Diversity, there were 417 nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States.
From 1964 to 1965, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average), in just one year.
From 1965 to 1966, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, in just one year.
From 1966 to 1967, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1967 to 1968, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1968 to 1969, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1969 to 1970, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1970 to 1971, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1971 to 1972, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1972 to 1973, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
In 1972, when I was in 2nd Grade, my dad took me to Hawk Mountain in Pennsylvania. It is a lookout point where migrating hawks and eagles are swept directly by the viewer.
At that time, there was a single sighting of a bald eagle in an entire year.
From 1973 to 1974, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1974 to 1975, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1975 to 1976, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1976 to 1977, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1977 to 1978, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1978 to 1979, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1979 to 1980, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1980 to 1981, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1981 to 1982, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1982 to 1983, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1983 to 1984, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1985 to 1986, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1986 to 1987, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1987 to 1988, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1988 to 1989, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1989 to 1990, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1990 to 2016, the number of counties in California with bald eagle nests increased by an annual average of 1.8%.
From 1990 to 2016, bald eagle nests in California increased by an annual average of 11%.
From 1990 to 2016, the number of counties in California with bald eagle nests increased by 46.4%, or by almost half, or by thirteen counties, from 28 to 41.
This is a sudden, hyper-exponential, historically-unprecedented expansion of the range of the bald eagle in California.
From 1990 to 2016, bald eagle nests in California increased by 285.7%, or by almost four times, or by eighty nests, from 28 to 108.
This is a sudden, hyper-exponential, historically-unprecedented expansion of the population and range of the bald eagle in California.
The California Wildlife Journal’s Daniel A. Airola, et al. omitted the percentage, offered no suggestion as to why it might have taken place, and also did not mention that it was part of a wider trend taking place regardless of species or geography.
Those are all examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
From 1990 to 1991, the number of counties in California with bald eagle nests increased by 1.8% (average).
From 1990 to 1991, bald eagle nests in California increased by 11% (average).
From 1990 to 1991, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
In 1990, per Jurek, there were bald eagle nests in 28 counties in California.
In 1990, per Jurek, there were 108 known bald eagle nesting territories in California.
From 1991 to 1992, the number of counties in California with bald eagle nests increased by 1.8% (average).
From 1991 to 1992, bald eagle nests in California increased by 11% (average).
From 1991 to 1992, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1992 to 2012, per Sorenson et al. in 2017, the bald eagle population in central coastal California “increased by an annual average of 18%”.
This is a sudden, hyper-exponential, historically-unprecedented increase in the bald eagle population in central coastal California which cannot be explained by conventional Biology.
Kelly J. Sorensen and his career scientist colleagues omitted the population numbers for 1992 and 2012, and chopped up the increase into annual increments to blunt its impact.
From 1992 to 2012, the the bald eagle population in central coastal California increased by 360%, or by more than four and a half times.
Kelly J. Sorenson, the Executive Director of the Ventana Wildlife Society, omitted the percentage, omitted the population numbers for 1992 and 2012, and chopped up the increase into annual increments to blunt its impact.
He offered no suggestion as to why it might have taken place, and also did not mention that it was part of a wider trend taking place regardless of species or geography.
Those are all examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
Thanks to his subterfuge, Kelly gets his picture in my article.
Here’s a picture of Kelly Sorenson, where the image is blatantly constructed to focus attention on his left eye, and where he’s using his left hand to make a purportedly-secret Masonic “gesture of recognition”.
(Kelly J. Sorenson, Executive Director of the Ventana Wildlife Society)
I have included Kelly J. Sorenson’s photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a pathologically-lying generational Satanist Freemason scientist looks like.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. Generational Satanists comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth.
It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
How long do you think that these people have left in power, now?
Please consider doing what you can to speed the transition.
From 1992 to 1993, the number of counties in California with bald eagle nests increased by 1.8% (average).
From 1992 to 1993, bald eagle nests in California increased by 11% (average).
From 1992 to 1993, the bald eagle population in central coastal California increased by 18% (average), or by almost one fifth.
From 1992 to 1993, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1993 to 1994, the number of counties in California with bald eagle nests increased by 1.8% (average).
From 1993 to 1994, bald eagle nests in California increased by 11% (average).
From 1993 to 1994, the bald eagle population in central coastal California increased by 18% (average), or by almost one fifth.
From 1993 to 1994, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1994 to 1995, the number of counties in California with bald eagle nests increased by 1.8% (average).
From 1994 to 1995, bald eagle nests in California increased by 11% (average).
From 1994 to 1995, the bald eagle population in central coastal California increased by 18% (average), or by almost one fifth.
From 1994 to 1995, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1995 to 1996, the number of counties in California with bald eagle nests increased by 1.8% (average).
From 1995 to 1996, bald eagle nests in California increased by 11% (average).
From 1995 to 1996, the bald eagle population in central coastal California increased by 18% (average), or by almost one fifth.
From 1995 to 1996, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average), or by almost one fifth.
From 1996 to 1997, the number of counties in California with bald eagle nests increased by 1.8% (average).
From 1996 to 1997, bald eagle nests in California increased by 11% (average).
From 1996 to 1997, the bald eagle population in central coastal California increased by 18% (average).
From 1996 to 1997, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1997 to 1998, the number of counties in California with bald eagle nests increased by 1.8% (average).
From 1997 to 1998, bald eagle nests in California increased by 11% (average).
From 1997 to 1998, the bald eagle population in central coastal California increased by 18% (average), or by almost one fifth.
From 1997 to 1998, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1998 to 2006, per the California Wildlife Journal’s Daniel A. Airola in 2007, the bald eagle population in the northern Sierra Nevada in California increased by an annual average of 3%.
The California Wildlife Journal’s Daniel A. Airola, et al. offered no suggestion as to why it might have taken place, and also did not mention that it was part of a wider trend taking place regardless of species or geography.
He also omitted the population numbers for 1998 and 2006, and chopped up the increase into annual increments to blunt its impact.
Those are examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
From 1998 to 2006, per the California Wildlife Journal’s Daniel A. Airola, et al. in 2007, the bald eagle population in the northern Sierra Nevada in California increased by 24%, or by almost one fourth.
Daniel withheld this percentage, and described it only-generally as “by an annual average of 3%”, and also withheld the population numbers.
Then Daniel and his colleagues said in comment “although the California population shows signs of recovering, few studies have assessed recent regional or statewide population status”.
When, in fact, From 1963 to 2007, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 2,574.5%, or by more than twenty six times, or by 10,623 pairs, from 417 to 11,040.
Further, a population of bald eagles in the northern Sierra Nevada in California which increased by 24%, or by almost one fourth in less than a decade cannot in good faith be described as merely “showing signs of recovering”.
I have exposed the duplicity of the career scientist Daniel A. Airola, his colleagues and his employer, the California Wildlife Journal by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
Thanks to this subterfuge, he gets his picture in my article.
Here’s a picture of Daniel Airola, where his left hand is the focal point of the image.
(Daniel A. Airola)
I have included his photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a pathologically-lying generational Satanist Freemason scientist looks like.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. Generational Satanists comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth.
It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
How long do you think that these people have left in power, now?
Please consider doing what you can to speed the transition.
From 1998 to 1999, the number of counties in California with bald eagle nests increased by 1.8% (average).
From 1998 to 1999, the bald eagle population in the northern Sierra Nevada in California increased by 3% (average).
From 1998 to 1999, bald eagle nests in California increased by 11% (average).
From 1998 to 1999, the bald eagle population in central coastal California increased by 18% (average), or by almost one fifth.
From 1998 to 1999, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 1999 to 2000, the number of counties in California with bald eagle nests increased by 1.8% (average).
From 1999 to 2000, the bald eagle population in the northern Sierra Nevada in California increased by 3% (average).
From 1999 to 2000, bald eagle nests in California increased by 11% (average).
From 1999 to 2000, the bald eagle population in central coastal California increased by 18% (average), or by almost one fifth.
From 1999 to 2000, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 2000 to 2001, the number of counties in California with bald eagle nests increased by 1.8% (average).
From 2000 to 2001, the bald eagle population in the northern Sierra Nevada in California increased by 3% (average).
From 2000 to 2001, bald eagle nests in California increased by 11% (average).
From 2000 to 2001, the bald eagle population in central coastal California increased by 18% (average), or by almost one fifth, in just one year.
From 2000 to 2001, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 2001 to 2002, the number of counties in California with bald eagle nests increased by 1.8% (average).
From 2001 to 2002, the bald eagle population in the northern Sierra Nevada in California increased by 3% (average).
From 2001 to 2002, bald eagle nests in California increased by 11% (average).
From 2001 to 2002, the bald eagle population in central coastal California increased by 18% (average), or by almost one fifth.
From 2001 to 2002, the 18% (average) increase in the bald eagle population in central coastal California was 63.6% greater, or almost two thirds greater than the 11% increase (average) increase in bald eagle nests in California during the same time period.
The fertility of the bald eagle in California is increasing exponentially because the health of the ether is inexorably improving, and the fertility of any organism varies directly with the health of the ether.
From 2001 to 2002, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 2002 to 2003, the number of counties in California with bald eagle nests increased by 1.8% (average).
From 2002 to 2003, the bald eagle population in the northern Sierra Nevada in California increased by 3% (average).
From 2002 to 2003, the bald eagle population in central coastal California increased by 18% (average), or by almost one fifth.
From 2002 to 2003, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 2003 to 2004, the number of counties in California with bald eagle nests increased by 1.8% (average).
From 2003 to 2004, the bald eagle population in the northern Sierra Nevada in California increased by 3% (average).
From 2003 to 2004, bald eagle nests in California increased by 11% (average).
From 2003 to 2004, the bald eagle population in central coastal California increased by 18% (average), or by almost one fifth, in just one year.
From 2003 to 2004, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 2004 to 2005, the number of counties in California with bald eagle nests increased by 1.8% (average).
From 2004 to 2005, the bald eagle population in the northern Sierra Nevada in California increased by 3% (average).
From 2004 to 2005, the bald eagle population in central coastal California increased by 18% (average), or by almost one fifth, in just one year.
From 2004 to 2005, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 2005 to 2006, the number of counties in California with bald eagle nests increased by 1.8% (average).
From 2005 to 2006, the bald eagle population in the northern Sierra Nevada in California increased by 3% (average).
From 2005 to 2006, bald eagle nests in California increased by 11% (average).
From 2005 to 2006, the bald eagle population in central coastal California increased by 18% (average), or by almost one fifth, in just one year.
From 2005 to 2006, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 2006 to 2007, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 13.3%, from 9,740 to 11,040.
From 2006 to 2007, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 13.3%, or by 1,300 pairs, from 9,740 to 11,040.
This is a sudden, hyper-exponential increase which cannot be explained by conventional Biology.
The uncredited author from the Center For Biological Diversity omitted the percentage, and instead described it only-generally as a “spectacular return” and “a nearly 1,300-pair increase”
Where “nearly” mitigates.
These are examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
In terms of what caused it, the uncredited author from the Center for Biological Diversity said, only-generally, that it was “one of the world’s great conservation success stories”.
Where “one of” mitigates, and where “success stories” gives the subconscious of the Coincidence theorist reader the green light to say “oh, that’s just a story that someone made up!”
As propagandists, the Center for Biological Diversity knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
Here, the general “conservation” doesn’t mention what specific efforts led to the historically-unprecedented, hyper-exponential increase in the bald eagle population in the United States, nor is there any mention of the fact that animal populations are increasing exponentially regardless of species or geography.
Those are examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
For those unaware, anytime an author is uncredited, it is proof that said author is an Intelligence operative.
From 2006 to 2007, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 1,300 pairs, from 9,740 to 11,040.
From 2006 to 2007, the 1,300-pair increase in the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States was 499.6% greater, or basically six times greater than its average annual increase of 216.8 pairs from 1963 to 2006.
The California Wildlife Journal’s Daniel A. Airola, et al. said in comment “the California population shows signs of recovering”.
This is a hyper-exponential, historically unprecedented increase in the population of the bald eagle in the United States which cannot be explained by conventional Biology.
The bald eagle in the United States is increasing hyper-exponentially in number because the health of the ether is inexorably improving, and the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism all vary directly with the health of the ether.
From 2006 to 2007, the number of counties in California with bald eagle nests increased by 1.8% (average).
From 2006 to 2007, bald eagle nests in California increased by 11% (average).
From 2006 to 2007, the bald eagle population in central coastal California increased by 18% (average), or by almost one fifth.
From 2006 to 2007, the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States increased by 58.5% (average), or by more than half, or by 241.4 pairs (average).
From 2006 to 2007, the 58.5% (average) increase in the number of nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States was 1.6% greater than its 52% average annual increase from 1963 to 2006.
The population of the bald eagle in the United States is increasing exponentially because the health of the ether is inexorably improving, and the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism all vary directly with the health of the ether.
In 2006, there were 9,740 nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States.
The uncredited author from the Center For Biological Diversity omitted the statistic. I had to do the math to learn it.
This careful, systematic omission is an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
From 2007 to 2008, the number of counties in California with bald eagle nests increased by 1.8% (average).
From 2007 to 2008, bald eagle nests in California increased by 11% (average).
From 2007 to 2008, the bald eagle population in central coastal California increased by 18% (average), or by almost one fifth.
In 2007, per the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, there were 11,040 nesting pairs of bald eagles in the United States.
From 2008 to 2009, the number of counties in California with bald eagle nests increased by 1.8% (average).
From 2008 to 2009, bald eagle nests in California increased by 11% (average).
From 2008 to 2009, the bald eagle population in central coastal California increased by 18% (average), or by almost one fifth.
From 2009 to 2010, the number of counties in California with bald eagle nests increased by 1.8% (average).
From 2009 to 2010, bald eagle nests in California increased by 11% (average).
From 2009 to 2010, the bald eagle population in central coastal California increased by 18% (average), or by almost one fifth.
From 2010 to 2011, the number of counties in California with bald eagle nests increased by 1.8% (average).
From 2010 to 2011, bald eagle nests in California increased by 11% (average).
From 2010 to 2011, the bald eagle population in central coastal California increased by 18% (average), or by almost one fifth.
From 2011 to 2024, nesting pairs of bald eagles in central California increased by an annual average of 51.9% (average), or by more than half.
From 2011 to 2024, nesting pairs of bald eagles in central California increased by 675%, or by almost eight times, or by 27 pairs, from 4 to 31.
This is a sudden, hyper-exponential, historically unprecedented increase in the population of the bald eagle in central California which cannot be explained by conventional Biology.
The California Wildlife Journal’s Daniel A. Airola, et al. omitted the percentage, described it as “increased by annual average of 19%”, offered no suggestion as to why it might have taken place, and also did not mention that it was part of a wider trend taking place regardless of species or geography.
Those are examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
From 2011 to 2012, the number of counties in California with bald eagle nests increased by 1.8% (average).
From 2011 to 2012, bald eagle nests in California increased by 11% (average).
From 2011 to 2012, the bald eagle population in central coastal California increased by 18% (average), or by almost one fifth.
From 2011 to 2012, nesting pairs of bald eagles in central California increased by 51.9% (average).
In 2011, per journal.wildlife.ca.gov’s Daniel A. Airola, et al., there were just four nesting pairs of bald eagles in Central Interior California.
From 2012 to 2015, the maximum age of the bald eagle increased by an annual average of 6.2%.
From 2012 to 2015, the maximum age of the bald eagle in the wild increased by 18.8%, or by six years, from 32 years to 38 years.
That is a sudden, hyper-exponential increase which cannot be explained by Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection.
Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection is false.
The truth is that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism all vary directly with the health of the ether.
In 2012, per mbound.com, “The oldest wild eagle on record is about 32 years of age”.
From 2012 to 2013, the number of counties in California with bald eagle nests increased by 1.8% (average).
From 2012 to 2013, the maximum age of the bald eagle increased by 6.2% (average).
From 2012 to 2013, bald eagle nests in California increased by 11% (average).
From 2012 to 2013, nesting pairs of bald eagles in central California increased by 51.9% (average).
From 2013 to 2014, the number of counties in California with bald eagle nests increased by 1.8% (average).
From 2013 to 2014, the maximum age of the bald eagle increased by 6.2% (average).
From 2013 to 2014, bald eagle nests in California increased by 11% (average).
From 2013 to 2014, nesting pairs of bald eagles in central California increased by 51.9% (average).
From 2014 to 2015, the number of counties in California with bald eagle nests increased by 1.8% (average).
From 2014 to 2015, the maximum age of the bald eagle increased by 6.2% (average).
From 2014 to 2015, bald eagle nests in California increased by 11% (average).
From 2014 to 2015, nesting pairs of bald eagles in central California increased by 51.9% (average).
From 2015 to 2016, the number of counties in California with bald eagle nests increased by 1.8% (average).
From 2015 to 2016, bald eagle nests in California increased by 11% (average).
From 2015 to 2016, nesting pairs of bald eagles in central California increased by 51.9% (average).
June 6, 2015 - Bald Eagle Death Yields New Lifespan Record for America’s National Animal".
Where the gymnastic “lifespan record” redacts “longevity”, where “National Animal” redacts “bird”, and where the exponential increase in the longevity of the bald eagle has been carefully obscured.
The article goes on to say “According to the band on the male’s leg, he was 38 years old, and he now holds the country’s record for the oldest bald eagle ever encountered, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation announced in a statement this week. It broke the previous longevity record by five years”.
Where the general “by five years” redacts the percentage increase, and where the date of the previous record is also redacted.
The author also didn’t mention that longevity was increasing regardless of species or geography.
Those are examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
From 2016 to 2017, nesting pairs of bald eagles in central California increased by 51.9% (average).
From 2017 to 2018, nesting pairs of bald eagles in central California increased by 51.9% (average).
From 2018 to 2019, nesting pairs of bald eagles in central California increased by 51.9% (average).
From 2019 to 2020, nesting pairs of bald eagles in central California increased by 51.9% (average).
From 2020 to 2021, nesting pairs of bald eagles in central California increased by 51.9% (average).
In 2016, per wildlife.ca.gov, there were bald eagle nests in 41 counties in California.
In 2016, per wildlife.ca.gov, there were 375 known bald eagle nesting territories in California.
From 2021 to 2022, nesting pairs of bald eagles in central California increased by 51.9% (average).
From 2022 to 2023, nesting pairs of bald eagles in central California increased by 51.9% (average).
From 2023 to 2024, nesting pairs of bald eagles in central California increased by 51.9% (average).
In 2024, per journal.wildlife.ca.gov’s Daniel A. Airola, et al., there were 31 nesting pairs of bald eagles in Central Interior California.
Jeff Miller, Honolulu, HI, June 25, 2026
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected].
