Watson: “You may be right.”
Holmes: "The probability lies in that direction.”
From “The Hound of the Baskervilles”, by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, 1902
”Besides these, I have found five curiosities in Scotland, not much observed to be elsewhere: (i) the brownies, who in some families clean the houses as drudges clean the houses and dishes after all go to bed, taking with him his portion of food and removing before daybreak; (ii) the Mason Word which, though some make a mystery of it, I will not conceal a little of what I know - it’s like a rabbinical tradition in a way of comment on Jachin and Boaz, the two pillars erected in Solomon’s Temple, with an addition of some secret sign delivered by hand to hand by which they know and become familiar one with another;"
From “The Secret Commonwealth of Elves, Fauns and Fairies”, by Robert Kirk, 1690
[image]
(Detail from frontispiece of The Builder’s Dictionary, 1734 ©Museum of Freemasonry, London)
In the image immediately above, the Scottish Rite Freemason on the right is using a gesture of recognition that means that he wants to “rock on”, or “Hail, Satan!”, depending upon one’s perspective. I’m afraid that, given the historical context, we’re going to have to throw out “support for the Texas Lonhorns football team” or saying “I love you” in American Sign Language.
They’re using conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.
THE DATA
In 2010, depression among Internet addicts in England was 2,135% greater than it was among non addicts. The University of Leeds’ Catriona M. Morrison omitted the percentage, and referred to it only-generally as "significant ".
From 2014 to 2018, the percentage of the populace which felt that the Internet was a bad thing for society increased by 25%, from 24% to 30%. Pew Research’s Aaron Smith omitted the percentage, said it was “6 percentage points”, and described it as “modest”.
In 2018, 30% of those polled felt that the internet was a bad thing for society.
In 2019, the percentage of female college students in India who spent seven to nine hours a day on the Internet was 350% greater, or heading toward five times greater than that of than their male peers (9% - 40 of 440 vs. 2% - 9 of 440).
In 2019, the percentage of female college students in India who spent three to six hours a day on the Internet was 244% greater, or well more than triple that of their male peers (31% - 136 of 440 vs. 9% - 39 of 440).
In 2019, the percentage of female college students in India who spent over nine hours a day on the Internet was 243% greater, or well more than triple that of their male peers (30.9% - 136 of 440 vs. 9% - 39 of 440).
In 2019, depression was present in 86% of internet addicts in India (288 of 336).
In 2019, anxiety was present in 83% of internet addicts in India (280 of 336).
In 2019, 81% of Indian college students were addicted to the Internet.
In 2019, stress was present in 57% of Internet addicts in India (192 of 336)
In 2019, the percentage of female college students in India who spent less than three hours a day on the Internet was 38% greater than their male peers (18% - 80 of 440 vs. 13% - 57 of 440).
In 2019, Internet addiction among female college students in India was 13% higher than it was among males (80.7% vs. 71.4%).
THE ARTICLES
On February 4, 2010, the journal Psychopathology published “The Relationship between Excessive Internet Use and Depression: A Questionnaire-Based Study of 1,319 Young People and Adults”.
Where, despite professing to be a scientist by trade, first author Catriona M. Morrison managed to entitle their study documenting hyper-exponentially increasing depression among Internet addicts in such a way where that fact cannot be discerned.
As a propagandist, Catriona knows that seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and her hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the exponential scope of the technology-driven increase in depression that she’s attempting to obfuscate.
You have to dig way down into the study to get to “There was a significant difference between the IA and the NA group in their levels of depressive symptoms, with the NA group firmly in the non-depressed range, and the IA group in the moderately-to-severely depressed range (F1, 34 = 22.35; p < 0.001).”
In 2010, depression among Internet addicts in England was 2,135% greater than it was among non addicts. The University of Leeds’ Catriona M. Morrison omitted the percentage, and referred to it only-generally as “a significant difference”.
Here’s Catriona’s picture, wearing a Satanic purple top, against a Satanic green background:
[image]
(Catriona M. Morrison, wearing a Satanic purple top, against a Satanic green background. As a bonus, she’s inclined her head to focus the image on her left eye, and the image is centered on her left eye. That’s because, to Illuminists like Catriona and her co-conspirator taking the picture, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or “the eye of Horus”. They figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.)
I have included her photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
Here’s On April 30, 2018, pewresearch.org said “Declining Majority of Online Adults Say the Internet Has Been Good for Society”.
Where author Aaron Smith wrote “declining majority" because, as a propagandist, they know that seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and his hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the exponential scope of the increase in distrust of the Internat that I’m documenting here. It’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The article goes on to say “A sizable majority of online adults (70%) continue to believe the internet has been a good thing for society. Yet the share of online adults saying this has declined by a modest but still significant 6 percentage points since early 2014, when the Center first asked the question.”
Where Aaron deviously wrote “6 percentage points” to obscure the far larger percentage decrease that he was attempting to obfuscate. To learn it, I had to pull the numbers out of a table in which he’d buried them, and then do the math.
Here’s Aaron Smith’s picture, in a Satanic green shirt in front of a Satanic purple background:
[image]
(Pew Reseearch’s Aaron Smith, in a Satanic green shirt in front of a Satanic purple background. As a bonus, he’s inclined his head to focus the image on his left eye, and the image is centered on his left eye. That’s because, to Illuminists like Aaron and his co-conspirator taking the picture, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or “the eye of Horus”. They figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.)
I have included his photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
From 2014 to 2018, the percentage of the populace which felt that the Internet was a bad thing for society increased by 25%, from 24% to 30%. Pew Research’s Aaron Smith omitted the percentage, said it was “6 percentage points”, and described it as “modest”.
In 2018, 30% of those polled felt that the internet was a bad thing for society.
On January 17, 2020, sciencedaily.com said “Internet use reduces study skills in university students”.
There is absolutely no data in the article from the major University.
Journal Reference:
Roberto Truzoli, Caterina Viganò, Paolo Gabriele Galmozzi, Phil Reed. Problematic internet use and study motivation in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2019; DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12414
In August 2019, the Journal of Family Community Medicine published “Internet Addiction and its Relationships with Depression, Anxiety, and Stress in Urban Adolescents of Kamrup District, Assam”.
Where, despite professing to be a scientist by trade, first author Anku M. Sadikia managed to entitle their study documenting exponentially increasing depression, anxiety and stress among Internet addicts in such a way where that fact cannot be discerned.
As a propagandist, Anku knows that seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and their hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the exponential scope of the technology-driven increase in depression, anxiety and stress that they are attempting to obfuscate.
In 2019, the percentage of female college students in India who spent over nine hours a day on the Internet was 243% greater, or well more than triple that of their male peers (30.9% - 136 of 440 vs. 9% - 39 of 440).
In 2019, the percentage of female college students in India who spent seven to nine hours a day on the Internet was 350% greater, or heading toward five times that of than their male peers (9% - 40 of 440 vs. 2% - 9 of 440).
In 2019, the percentage of female college students in India who spent three to six hours a day on the Internet was 244% greater, or well more than triple that of their male peers (31% - 136 of 440 vs. 9% - 39 of 440).
In 2019, the percentage of female college students in India who spent less than three hours a day on the Internet was 38% greater than their male peers (18% - 80 of 440 vs. 13% - 57 of 440).
In 2019, depression was present in 86% of internet addicts in India (288 of 336).
In 2019, anxiety was present in 83% of internet addicts in India (280 of 336).
In 2019, 81% of Indian college students were addicted to the Internet.
In 2019, stress was present in 57% of Internet addicts in India (192 of 336)
“The overall prevalence of Internet addiction was 80.7%, with 84.2% female and 71.4% male.”
In 2019, Internet addiction among female college students in India was 13% higher than it was among males (80.7% vs. 71.4%).
On December 12, 2019, the Journal of Computer Assisted Learning published “Problematic internet use and study motivation in higher education”.
Where, despite professing to be a scientist by trade, first author Roberto Truzoli managed to entitle his study documenting exponentially decreasing study skills among Internet addicts in such a way where that fact cannot be discerned.
As a propagandist, Roberto knows that seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and his hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the exponential scope of the technology-driven decrease in study skills that he’s attempting to obfuscate.
There’s no data in the abstract for the paper. I’d have to pay $12 for 24 hour online access. That’s called a “paywall”, and it’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
So I went to phys.org, who said “The study found a negative relationship between internet addiction and motivation to study.”
Here, they “buried” the data in a separate link. The link is now dead. That’s an example of the propaganda tecnique known as “compartmentalization”.
Here’s Roberto Truzoli’s picture, in a natty Satanic purple blazer, in front of a Satanic purple background:
[image]
(Roberto Truzoli in a natty Satanic purple blazer in front of a Satanic purple background. As a bonus, he’s inclined his head to focus the image on his left eye, and the image is centered on his left eye. That’s because, to Illuminists like Roberto and his co-conspirator taking the picture, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or “the eye of Horus”. They figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.)
I have included his photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
In October 2020, the journal Ecological Economics published "Internet Use and Lower Life Satisfaction: The Mediating Effect of Environmental Quality Perception
Where author Jiaping Zhang wrote “lower life satisfaction" because, as a propagandist, they know that seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and his hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the exponential technology-drivendecrease life satistfcation that I’m documenting here. It’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
There’s absolutely no data in the study. It is, in journalistic parlance, “buried” in two separate tables, neither of which are available without purchase of the article. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as a “paywall”, which is a sub-variant of “compartmentalization”.
Jeff Miller, Libertyville, IL, January 12, 2022
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
