'Tis surprising to see how rapidly a panic will sometimes run through a country. All nations and ages have been subject to them. Britain has trembled like an ague at the report of a French fleet of flat-bottomed boats; and in the fifteenth century the whole English army, after ravaging the kingdom of France, was driven back like men petrified with fear; and this brave exploit was performed by a few broken forces collected and headed by a woman, Joan of Arc. Would that heaven might inspire some Jersey maid to spirit up her countrymen, and save her fair fellow sufferers from ravage and ravishment!
Yet panics, in some cases, have their uses; they produce as much good as hurt. Their duration is always short; the mind soon grows through them, and acquires a firmer habit than before. But their peculiar advantage is, that they are the touchstones of sincerity and hypocrisy, and bring things and men to light, which might otherwise have lain forever undiscovered. In fact, they have the same effect on secret traitors, which an imaginary apparition would have upon a private murderer. They sift out the hidden thoughts of man, and hold them up in public to the world. Many a disguised Tory has lately shown his head, that shall penitentially solemnize with curses the day on which Howe arrived upon the Delaware.
From “The American Crisis, No. 1”, by Thomas Paine, 1776
“There appears to be what is called ‘generational satanists,’ and they bring up their children to participate in the way that they themselves have as children,” Farnell said. He alleged that the sisters were abused by their grandparents as well as by their father (now deceased), their mother and other adults in rituals that took place in caves, probably in the San Bernardino mountains.
“These are things that are admittedly quite bizarre, but these things do happen, they have happened and they can be documented by people other than these three victims,” Farnell said. “The people who perpetuate these kinds of offenses should realize that they are not safe from their victims’ remembering and coming after them.”
From “Forced to Kill Her Baby, Woman Says”, the Los Angeles Times, March 21, 1991
“The swing of his nature took him from extreme languor to devouring energy; and as I knew well, he was never so truly formidable as when, for days on end, he had been lounging in his armchair amid his improvisations and his black-letter editions. Then it was that the lust of the chase would suddenly come upon him, and that his brilliant reasoning power would rise to the level of intuition, until those who were unacquainted with his methods would look askance at him as on a man whose knowledge was not that of other mortals. When I saw him that afternoon so enwrapped in the music of St. James’s Hall I felt that an evil time might be coming upon those whom he had set himself to hunt down.”
Dr. John Watson, from “The Red Headed League”, by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, 1891
[image]
(Robert Downey, Jr., as Sherlock Holmes, from “Sherlock Holmes, Game of Shadows”, 2011
“I cry you mercy!” interrupted the Chancellor, who saw a dangerous enthusiasm rising in the King’s face. “March upon Paris? Does your Excellency forget that the way bristles with English strongholds?”
“That for your English strongholds!” and Joan snapped her fingers scornfully. “Whence have we marched in these last days? From Gien. And whither? To Rheims. What bristled between? English strongholds. What are they now? French ones—and they never cost a blow!” Here applause broke out from the group of generals, and Joan had to pause a moment to let it subside. “Yes, English strongholds bristled before us; now French ones bristle behind us. What is the argument? A child can read it. The strongholds between us and Paris are garrisoned by no new breed of English, but by the same breed as those others—with the same fears, the same questionings, the same weaknesses, the same disposition to see the heavy hand of God descending upon them. We have but to march!—on the instant—and they are ours, Paris is ours, France is ours!”
From “Saint Joan of Arc”, by Mark Twain, 1896
[image]
(Cover, “Saint Joan of Arc”, by Mark Twain, 1896)
THE DATA
From 1979 to 2022, the average percentage of the U.S. populace who had a great deal of trust in their institutions decreased by 44%, from 48% to 27%.
That’s an average decrease in trust of 1% per year over each of those 43 years.
From 2008 to 2022, public trust in charities in the U.K. decreased by 22% , from 72% to 56%.
From 2020 to 2021, American’s confidence that medical scientists are acting in the best interests of the public decreased by 28%, from 40% to 29%. White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator Dr. Ashish Jha said it was due to “lack of representation in the scientific field”.
In 2020, at the height of the Covid-19 “Pandemic”, 60% of the U.S. populace distrusted medical scientists.
Then, from 2020 to 2022, the average percentage of the U.S. populace who had a great deal of trust in their institutions decreased by 25% , from 36% to 27%. That’s an average decrease in trust of 12.5% per year over each of those two years.
The 12.5% average annual decrease in trust in the U.S. from 2020 to 2022 was 1,150% greater than the 1% average annual decrease there from 1979 to 2022.
As you can see, the rubes’ decrease in trust of the self-described Con “Artists” in the U.S. is increasing exponentially, going forward in time.
When the U.S. public figured out that the Chinese bat virus had not accidentally mutated, as falsely alleged, but rather had been genetically engineered via the addition of four amino acids for improved transmissibility to humans, their trust in the institutions lying serially to them decreased precipitously.
In 2021, 71% of the U.S. populace distrusted medical scientists.
From 2021 to 2022, the percentage of Americans who had a great deal of trust in the presidency decreased by 15%, from 38% to 23%.
From 2021 to 2022, the percentage of Americans who had a great deal of trust in the Supreme Court decreased by 11%, from 36% to 25%.
From 2021 to 2022, public trust in charities in the U.K. decreased by 6.6%, from 60% to 56%.
The 6.6% decrease in trust in charities in the U.K. from 2021 to 2022 was 313% greater than the 1.6% average annual decrease in trust there from 2008 to 2022.
As you can see, the rubes’ decrease in trust of the self-described Con “Artists” in the U.K. is increasing exponentially, going forward in time.
From 2021 to 2022, the percentage of Americans who had a great deal of trust in the medical system decreased by 6%, from 44% to 38%.
Wait, what? I thought that the medical system had just saved us from the only-accidentally-mutated Chinese bat virus, you know, with rushed-to-market miracle vaccines, and life-saving policies of mask wearing and social distancing? What gives?
When the U.S. public figured out that the Chinese bat virus had not accidentally mutated, as falsely alleged, but rather had been genetically engineered via the addition of four amino acids for improved transmissibility to humans, their trust in the institutions lying serially to them decreased precipitously.
From June 2021 to June 2022, U.S. President Joe Biden’s approval rating decreased by 15%. And for any who think I’m endorsing former President Donald Trump, here, his 30,000-plus documented and vetted lies during his term clearly forbid me from doing so.
THE ARTICLES
EXPONENTIALLY DECREASING TRUST IN THE U.S.
In July 2022, news.gallup.com said "Confidence in U.S. Institutions Down ; Average at New Low ".
Where author Jeffrey M. Jones used the general “confidence down” and “at new low”. As a propagandist, he knows that, since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, his hedging generalities go a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the exponential decrease in trust I’m documenting here.
Confidence games, or “Cons”, for short, depend on first gaining the confidence or trust of “rube” whom the self-described “Con Artist” will go on to swindle, or “fleece”.
Using a time-honored propaganda technique, Jeff “buried” the data in a table below. If only 30% read the headlines, what percentage do you think read the tables?
From 2021 to 2022, the percentage of Americans who had a great deal of trust in the presidency decreased by 15%, from 38% to 23%.
From 2021 to 2022, the percentage of Americans who had a great deal of trust in the Supreme Court decreased by 11%, from 36% to 25%.
From 2021 to 2022, the percentage of Americans who had a great deal of trust in the medical system decreased by 6%, from 44% to 38%.
Wait, what? I thought that the medical system had just saved us from the only-accidentally-mutated Chinese bat virus, you know, with miracle, rushed-to-market vaccines, and life-saving policies of mask wearing and social distancing? What gives?
From June 2021 to June 2022, U.S. President Joe Biden’s approval rating decreased by 15%.
The article goes on to say “This year’s poll marks new lows in confidence for all three branches of the federal government – the Supreme Court (25%), the presidency (23%) and Congress. Five other institutions are at their lowest points in at least three decades of measurement, including the church or organized religion (31%), newspapers (16%), the criminal justice system (14%), big business (14%) and the police. Confidence in large technology companies is also at a low point (26%) but has only been measured the past three years.”
The key thing is that, once confidence has been lost, it cannot be regained - that is unless those who have had confidence in themselves lost regain it through repenting of and undoing their evil ways.
Since their choice is between ruin and repentance, there is a slim chance that they might choose the latter course, if only out of self-preservation.
In either case, the upright are winning, right now, and will win, ultimately. The Meek are inheriting the Earth, as the late Don Croft was fond of reminding.
In a table buried still lower in the article I learned that, from 2020 to 2022, the average percentage of the U.S. populace who had a great deal of trust in their institutions decreased by 25%, from 36% to 27%.
From 2004 to 2022, the average percentage of the U.S. populace who had a great deal of trust in their institutions decreased by 37%, from 43% to 27%.
That’s an average decrease in trust of 2% per year over each of those 18 years.
The 12.5% average annual decrease in trust in the U.S. from 2020 to 2022 was 1,150% greater than the 1% average annual decrease there from 1979 to 2022.
As you can see, the rubes’ decrease in trust of the self-described Con “Artists” is increasing exponentially, going forward in time.
The article goes on to say “The confidence average is also down nine points from 2020, when Americans rallied around some of the institutions most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, expressing greater confidence in the medical system, public schools and organized religion.”
As you can see, when the U.S. public figured out that the Chinese bat virus had not accidentally mutated, as alleged, but rather had been genetically engineered via the addition of four amino acids for improved transmissibility to humans, their trust in the institutions lying serially to them decreased precipitously.
con·fi·dence game - confidence trick; plural noun: confidence tricks; noun: confidence game; plural noun: confidence games
a swindle in which the victim is persuaded to trust the swindler in some way.
COVID-19 - noun - A highly contagious respiratory disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
-id - suffix
of or pertaining to; appended to words to make an English adjective or noun form.
Forming nouns from Latin or Greek roots, being suffixed to the name of their progenitors and meaning “descendant(s) of”
Covin - noun -from Old French, from medieval Latin convenium, from Latin convenire (see convene).
a. collusive agreement between two or more persons to the detriment of a third: conspiracy. b archaic : fraud, trickery
Compare with coven:
Coven - noun - mid 17th century: variant of covin.
a group or gathering of witches who meet regularly.
often derogatory
a secret orclose-knit group of associates.
“covens of militants within the party”
-īnus (feminine -īna, neuter -īnum); first/second-declension suffix
Of or pertaining to; -ine; usually indicates a relationship of position, possession, or origin.
Descendants[edit]
Catalan: -í
English: -ine
French: -in
Galician: -iño, -ino
Italian: -ino
Portuguese: -ino, -inho
Romanian: -in
Spanish: -ino
The gallup article goes on to say “All Party Groups Less Confident in Institutions
All partisan groups are generally less confident in the 16 U.S. institutions than they were a year ago, with average declines of four points among Republicans, five points among Democrats and six points among independents.”
This is seminal information. Regardless of Party, all the rubes are getting wise that the folks up at the top of their pyramidally-constructed political party are serial liars, con artists. The fact that Independents are coming up the curve most quickly is no surprise.
Here’s Gallup Senior Editor Jeffrey M. Jones’ picture:
(Gallup Senior Editor Jeffrey M. Jones, who described American trust in institutions that decreased by 25% with “confidence down”.)
I’ve included his photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
They’re all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth.
It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
EXPONENTIALLY DECREASING TRUST IN THE U.K.
In July 2022, gov.uk published “Public trust in charities 2022”.
Can you see how the headline is written so that you cannot discern that the article is, in fact, about exponentially decreasing trust in charities in the U.K.?
Actually, it’s more brazen, still: the article is about dropping trust of all sorts. The unnamed Intelligence operative writing the article tried to “compartmentalize” it merely to charities.
For those late to the party, anytime an author is uncredited, it is proof that said author is an Intelligence asset.
As a propagandist, the curiously-uncredited author knows that, since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, this hedging generality goes a long way toward blunting awareness of the exponential decrease in trust I’m documenting here.
Using a time-honored propaganda technique, author “buried” the data in a table below. If only 30% of readers go on the headlines, what percentage do you think read the tables?
From 2021 to 2022, public trust in Doctors in the U.K. decreased by .5%.
From 2021 to 2022, public trust in newspapers in the U.K. decreased by .4%.
As you can see, when the public in the U.K. figured out that the Chinese bat virus had not accidentally mutated, as falsely alleged, but rather had been genetically engineered via the addition of four amino acids for improved transmissibility to humans, their trust in the institutions lying serially to them decreased accordingly.
In a table buried even lower in the article, we learn that, from 2008 to 2022, public trust in charities in the U.K. decreased by 22% , from 72% to 56%.
That’s an average annual decrease in trust of 1.6% per year over each of those 14 years.
And that, from 2021 to 2022, public trust in charities in the U.K. decreased by 6.6%, from 60% to 56%.
The 6.6% decrease in trust in charities in the U.K. from 2021 to 2022 was 313% greater than the 1.6% average annual decrease in trust there from 2008 to 2022.
As you can see, the rubes’ decrease in trust of the self-described Con “Artists” is increasing exponentially, going forward in time.
EXPONENTIALLY DECREASING TRUST IN MEDICAL SCIENTISTS IN THE U.S.
In July 2022, cnbc.com said “White House Covid czar Dr. Jha: This stat shows why many Americans still don’t trust the science”.
Can you see how “still don’t trust” implies no motion, no change? You have to be one of just 30% of readers who actually read the articles to learn “U.S. adults say their confidence that medical scientists are acting in the best interest of the public is decreasing: Just 29% expressed that trust in late 2021, down from 40% in late 2020”.
Author Renee Onque provided the numbers, but used the only-general “down from 40%” to hide the far more impactful percentage decrease between them.
So, I had to do the math to learn that, from 2020 to 2021, Americans’ confidence that medical scientists are acting in the best interests of the public decreased by 28%, from 40% to 29%. White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator Dr. Ashish Jha said it was due to “lack of representation in the scientific field”.
Wow! At the height of the Con, 60% of the populace distrusted medical scientists. Then, as the public in the U.S. figured out that the Chinese bat virus had not accidentally mutated, as falsely alleged, but rather had been genetically engineered via the addition of four amino acids for improved transmissibility to humans, their trust in the institutions lying serially to them decreased exponentially further, still.
Here’s author Renee Onque’s picture:
[image]
(CNBC’s Renee Onque, who said “why many Americans still don’t trust the science” about trust in science that had decreased by almost 30% in one year)
I’ve included her photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
They’re all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth.
It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
Jeff Miller, Gurnee, IL, July 28, 2022
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
