From 2020 to 2022, the percentage of the US public who distrusted scientists increased by 91.6%, from 12% to 23%. But, then, that's what the barely-covert international release of a weaponized Chinese bat virus will do to one's reputation

“Every person of learning is finally his own teacher.”

- Thomas Paine

THE DATA

From 2018 to 2022, the percentage of Americans who had a great deal of trust in the military decreased by 31%, from 70% to 48%.

From 2020 to 2022, the percentage of Americans who distrusted the military, the police, religious figures, school administrators, and business leaders increased in every example.

From April 2020 to September 2022, the percentage of the US public who distrusted scientists increased by 91.6% , from 12% to 23%.

From April 2020 to September 2022, the percentage of the US public who had a great deal of trust in scientists decreased by 28% , from 39% to 28%.

But, that’s what the barely-covert international release of a weaponized Chinese bat virus will do to your reputation.

From 2021 to 2022, the percentage of Americans who had a great deal of trust the military increased by 7%, from 45% to 48%.

However, in 2022, 52%, or a majority of Americans distrusted the military, and, from 2018 to 2022, the percentage of Americans who had a great deal of trust in the military decreased by 31%, from 70% to 48%.

In the parlance of the Confidence game, the public with a great deal of trust are “rubes”, or those who have confidence in the charlatans running the con.

And those who distrust the institutions are “rubes who have gotten wise”, or have caught on to the fact that the people running the con are charlatans.

THE ARTICLES

On October 25, 2022, arstechnica.com headlined an article about exponentially decreasing trust in scientists in the US with “US public’s trust in science shows growing partisan gap”.

As a propagandist, author John Timmer knows that seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and the hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the speed and scope of the decrease in trusts in scientists in the US, which, in journalistic parlance, he has “buried” below.

The article, which is about a sudden, exponential decrease in scientists, goes directly on to say “Trust in scientists remains high, but Republicans want them out of policy decisions.”

The article goes on to say “…trust in scientists had been trending upward and peaked in the early days of the pandemic, based on a survey done in 2020, when only 12 percent of the public said they lacked trust in scientists. By 2021, this mistrust had nearly doubled, with 22 percent saying they lacked trust in scientists; it’s stayed in roughly the same place (23 percent) in the latest survey.”

Did you notice how Mr. Timmer replaced the far more impactful, specific percentage increase, and replaced it with the general “had nearly doubled”? That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

So, I had to do the math to learn that, from 2020 to 2021, the percentage of US citizens who distrusted scientists increased by 83%, from 12% to 22%. But that’s what the barely-covert international release of a weaponized Chinese bat virus will do for your reputation.

As a propagandist, arstechnica.com’s John Timmer provided that single example, and studiously omitted a number of others, by, in journalistic parlance, “burying” them in a separate table. If 70% of readers only read the headlines, what percentage do you think do the math on figures embedded in tables?

From April 2020 to September 2022, the percentage of the US public who had a great deal of trust in scientists decreased by 28%, from 39% to 28%.

But, wait, it gets better! When I reviewed the table that author John Timmer “buried” all the data in, I learned that, in 2022, 23% of the US public did not trust scientists. Up above, you’ll recall that John used the 22% from 2021, and we’ve now learned that he memory-holed the 5%-higher 23% from 2022.

That’s because he’s a two-faced Illuminist shill, whose duplicity I have exposed by using what was known in the old days as fact-checking".

Shill - noun - an accomplice of a hawker, gambler, or swindler who acts as an enthusiastic customer to entice or encourage others.

Here’s the statistic he kept you from knowing:

From April 2020 to September 2022, the percentage of the US public who distrusted scientists increased by 91.6%, from 12% to 23%.

The article goes on to say “Another important bit of context is that trust seems to have declined across the board since 2020. The number of people expressing distrust in the military rose over this period. Same for the police, religious figures, school administrators, and business leaders.”

The trust in the folks at the top of all the control pyramids is decreasing at once.

Confidence games, or “Con’s”, for short, run on trust. The falsely-gained trust of the self-described Con “artist”.

Here’s John Timmer’s picture, in a Satanic purple shirt:

[image]

(arstechnica.com’s John Timmer, in Satanic purple shirt. He figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery)

I have included his photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.

They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.

But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.

Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.

On December 1, 2022, thehill.com headlined a story on exponentially-decreasing trust in the US military with “Trust in US military remains below 50 percent: survey”.

Author Brad Hill tacked “survey” on the end of the headline to give the subconscious of the Coincidence theorist reader the green light to say “oh, but that was just one survey!”, or “oh, you can make those surveys show anything!

As a propagandist, Brad knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.

The article goes on to say “About 48 percent of Americans say they have a great deal of trust in the military, slightly up from 45 percent last year. Confidence in the U.S. military has plummeted in recent years. In 2018, about 70 percent of Americans said they had a great deal of trust in the institution.”

The Hill’s Brad, er, Hill provided the numbers, but hedged by omitting the percentage of both “slightly up” and “has plummeted”.

He used “plummeted” as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer.

From 2018 to 2022, the percentage of Americans who had a great deal of trust in the military decreased by 31%, from 70% to 48%.

From 2021 to 2022, the percentage of Americans who had a great deal of trust the military increased by 7%, from 45% to 48%.

However, in 2022, 52%, or a majority of Americans distrusted the military.

Jeff Miller, Libertyville, IL, December 27, 2022

If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]