“It has always been my habit to hide none of my methods, either from my friend Watson or from anyone who might take an intelligent interest in them.”
Sherlock Holmes, from “The Reigate Puzzle”, 1893
THE DATA
From 2003 to 2023, the average size of the Chesapeake Bay dead zone decreased by 66%, from an all-time high 1.52 cubic miles to an all-time low .52 cubic miles
From 2003 to 2023, the average annual size of the Chesapeake Bay dead zone decreased by an annual average of 3.3%.
In 2003, the Chesapeake Bay dead zone averaged 1.52 cubic miles, the largest since recordkeeping began in 1985.
From 2021 to 2022, the 57% decrease in the average size of the Chesapeake Bay dead zone was 1,627% greater than its 3.3% long-term annual average decrease from 1985 to 2023.
From 2021 to 2022, the average size of the Chesapeake Bay dead zone decreased by 57%, from 1.5 cubic miles to .65 cubic miles.
The Chesapeake Bay Foundation’s Director of Science and Agricultural Policy, Beth McGee said that it was due to “our pollution reduction efforts”.
Beth didn’t mention anything about the fact that water quality and clarity was increasing regardless of geography.
That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
In 2021, the Chesapeake Bay dead zone averaged 1.5 cubic miles.
In 2021, the 1.5 cubic mile average size of the Chesapeake Bay dead zone was 35% below its .97 cubic mile long-term average from 1985 to 2022.
Chesapeake Bay Program Communications Director Rachel Felver withheld the percentage, and described it only-generally as “average”.
From 2022 to 2023, the average size of the Chesapeake Bay dead zone decreased by 20%, from .65 cubic miles to .52 cubic miles
From 2022 to 2023, the 20% decrease in the average size of the Chesapeake Bay dead zone was 506% greater, or more than six times greater than its 3.3% long-term annual average decrease from 1985 to 2023.
In 2022, the Chesapeake Bay dead zone averaged .65 cubic miles.
In 2022, the .65 cubic-mile Chesapeake Bay dead zone 33% below its long-term average of .97 miles from 1985 to 2022.
The Chesapeake Bay Foundation’s Media and Communications Coordinator A.J. Metcalf withheld the percentage, and described it merely as “smaller than the historical average”.
The Chesapeake Bay Foundation’s Director of Science and Agricultural Policy, Beth McGee also omitted the percentage, described it merely as “below average”, and then walked it back further still to “average”, and then concluded “much of the bay is still off-limits for aquatic life”.
When, in fact, while cubic miles and square miles are not the same, .65 is .014% of the Chesapeake Bay’s 4,479 square miles of surface area.
I have exposed the duplicity of The Chesapeake Bay Foundation’s Director of Science and Agricultural Policy, Beth McGee by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In November 2022, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation’s Media and Communications Coordinator A.J. Metcalf downgraded the average size of the Chesapeake Bay dead zone by 19%, from an actual .97 cubic miles to a fraudulent .79 cubic miles.
I have exposed the duplicity of A.J. Metcalf and the Chesapeake Bay Foundation by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In 2023, the Chesapeake Bay dead zone averaged .52 cubic miles, the lowest since recordkeeping began in 1985.
Marjy Friedrichs, professor at William & Mary’s Virginia Institute of Marine Science said of the lowest levels of hypoxia in history "The low levels of hypoxia in 2023, despite the high temperatures, are truly surprising.”
In 2023, the .52 cubic-mile Chesapeake Bay dead zone was 46% below its long-term average of .97 miles from 1985 to 2022.
Marjy Friedrichs, professor at William & Mary’s Virginia Institute of Marine Science, said that it was because of “our nutrient reduction strategies”.
THE ARTICLES
SEPTEMBER 2021
On September 17, 2021, news.maryland.gov said “The hypoxic water volume — areas with less than 2 mg/l oxygen — was 1.88 and 1.61 cubic miles during early and late August monitoring cruises, compared to historical early and late August averages (1985-2020) of 1.35 and 1.06 cubic miles.”
Can you see how the Science Feds in Maryland cut the data up into four pieces, so that nobody on Earth would ever do the math? Well, I did the math.
In 2021, the Chesapeake Bay dead zone averaged 1.5 cubic miles.
DECEMBER 2021
On December 13, 2021, usgs.gov said “Experts Find an Average Chesapeake Bay Dead Zone in 2021”.
Where Chesapeake Bay Program Communications Director Rachel Felver said “Experts Find an Average Chesapeake Bay Dead Zone in 2021” because it’s general.
As a propagandist, Rachel knows that, since seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, her hedging generality goes a long way toward blunting awareness of the scope of the sudden, exponential decrease in the size of the Chesapeake Bay dead zone which she is attempting to obfuscate.
There’s no mention of any motion or trend in this headline.
Spectacularly, Rachel’s article doesn’t mention anything about the specific size of the Chesapeake Bay dead zone in 2021. So I’m going to have to look up another article.
Here’s Rachel Felver’s picture, where she’s slightly off-center to the left, to accentuate her left eye:
(Chesapeake Bay Program Communications Director Rachel Felver, who described a Chesapeake Bay dead zone 33% below average as “average”.)
The picture features her left eye because, to generational Satanist Freemasons like Rachel, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or the “eye of Horus”.
But don’t take my word for it:
‘The right eye is the Eye of Ra and the left is the Eye of Horus’.”
From “Freemasonry - Religion And Belief - The 3rd Temple”
Facebook: “Welcome to the Left-Hand-Path-Network, where Satanism is not about worship, but it’s study.”
I have included Rachel’s picture so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist Freemason in a position of marginal influence looks like.
She figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.
Generational Satanists are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth.
It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
NOVEMBER 2022
On November 17, 2022, cbf.org said “CBF Statement on 2022 Chesapeake Bay Dead Zone Survey Results”.
Where the Chesapeake Bay Foundation’s Media and Communications Coordinator A.J. Metcalf said "CBF Statement on 2022 Chesapeake Bay Dead Zone Survey Results" because it’s general.
As a propagandist, A.J. knows that, since seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, his hedging generality goes a long way toward blunting awareness of the scope of the sudden, exponential decrease in the size of the Chesapeake Bay dead zone which he is attempting to obfuscate.
The article goes on to say “The Chesapeake Bay Foundation (CBF) is encouraged by new survey results released Wednesday by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources and Old Dominion University that found the area of low dissolved oxygen in the Bay was better than average for 2022.”
Here, A.J. has once again used the generalities “results” and “better”, while basically restating the headline, which is a violent command to the subconscious of the Coincidence theorist reader to stop reading immediately.
The article goes on to say “this area in the Bay’s mainstem is referred to as the dead zone because it is inhospitable to marine life such as oysters, striped bass, and blue crabs. According to the survey results, in 2022 the size of the dead zone averaged about 0.65 cubic miles, smaller than the historical average of 0.79 cubic miles, making it the 10th smallest recorded dead zone in the survey’s 38-year history.”
Wait, .79 miles, what? I fact-checked that, and a current article on chesapeakebay.net says “The average dead zone size is . 97 cubic miles”.
In November 2022, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation’s A.J. Metcalf downgraded the average size of the Chesapeake Bay dead zone by 19%, from an actual .97 cubic miles to a fraudulent .79 cubic miles.
I have exposed his duplicity by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
Did you notice how, yet again, the general “smaller” was used to obfuscate the specific size of the decrease in the dead zone area?
That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
So, I had to do the math.
In 2022, the Chesapeake Bay dead zone averaged .65 cubic miles, which was 17.7% less than the long-term average of .79 miles from 1985 to 2022.
The article goes on to say "In response to the dead zone survey results, CBF’s Director of Science and Agricultural Policy Beth McGee issued the following statement:
“This year’s results showing a ‘better than average’ dead zone is, in part, a reflection that our pollution reduction efforts are working. Unfortunately, ‘average’ or ‘better than average’ isn’t acceptable as it means much of the Bay is still off-limits for aquatic life."
For those keeping score, the Chesapeake Bay has a surface area of 4,479 square miles, and, while cubic miles cannot be converted to square miles, or vice versa, I’ll note that .65 is .014% of 4,479, which makes the Chesapeake Bay Foundation’s Director of Science and Agricultural Policy, Beth McGee’s statement that the 10th-smallest dead zone in the history of the Chesapeake meant that “much of the bay is still off-limits for aquatic life” a fantastic, bald-faced lie.
Did you notice how, with a straight face, Beth described 2022’s 33% below average as “below average”, and then walked it back to “average”?
Here’s A.J. Metcalf’s picture, where he’s slightly off-center to the left, to accentuate his left eye:
(The Chesapeake Bay Foundation’s Media and Communications Coordinator A.J. Metcalf, who downgraded the average size of the Chesapeake Bay dead zone by 19%, from an actual .97 cubic miles to a fraudulent .79 cubic miles., and who called a dead zone 33% below average “better than average”, while withholding the percentage.)
The picture features his left eye because, to generational Satanist Freemasons like A.J., the left eye is the “eye of Will” or the “eye of Horus”.
But don’t take my word for it:
‘The right eye is the Eye of Ra and the left is the Eye of Horus’.”
From “Freemasonry - Religion And Belief - The 3rd Temple”
Facebook: “Welcome to the Left-Hand-Path-Network, where Satanism is not about worship, but it’s study.”
I have included A.J.’s picture so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist Freemason in a position of marginal influence looks like.
He figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.
Generational Satanists are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth.
It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
DECEMBER 2023
On December 26, 2023, news.wm.edu said “The 2023 Chesapeake Bay dead zone is the smallest on record”.
Where the uncredited author from William and Mary said “smallest on record” because it’s general.
As a propagandist, they know that, since seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, this hedging generality goes a long way toward blunting awareness of the scope of the sudden, exponential decrease in the size of the Chesapeake Bay dead zone which they are attempting to obfuscate.
“Smallest on record” holds out the queasy hope that there had been plenty of other years with smaller dead zones, only nobody recorded them.
An honest journalist would have written “smallest in history”, or “smallest since record-keeping began”.
For those unaware, anytime an author is uncredited, it is proof that said author is an Intelligence operative.
The article goes on to say:
“The combination of pollution reduction practices and below-average rainfall result in a historically small dead zone.”
Where the general plausible-deniability excuses of “pollution reduction practices” and “below-average rainfall” have been used in place of the truth, that the improvement of the health of the ether is driving the increase in health of the Chesapeake Bay.
The article goes on to say “The Virginia Institute of Marine Science’s annual report of “dead-zone” conditions in the Chesapeake Bay indicates that hypoxic, low-oxygen conditions in 2023 were at their lowest since monitoring began in 1985. These results concur with a separate report issued by the Chesapeake Bay Program in conjunction with the Maryland Department of Natural Resources (MD DNR).”
Did you notice how, with “lowest since monitoring began” and “these results”, that there’s no mention of the current size, or the previous size, or the difference between the two? That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The article goes on to say:
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those many variants is “surprised”.
That’s why uncredited Intelligence operative from William and Mary article goes on to say “The low levels of hypoxia in 2023, despite the high temperatures, are truly surprising,” said Marjy Friedrichs, professor at William & Mary’s Virginia Institute of Marine Science. “This may finally be clear evidence that our nutrient reduction strategies are improving water quality and fish and shellfish habitats.”
Where Marjy Friedrichs, professor at William and Mary’s Virginia Institute of Marine Science walked the lowest levels of hypoxia in the history of Chesapeake Bay back to merely “low”, and then attributed their decrease to the lowest level in history to “our nutrient reduction strategies”.
Despite the fact that she studies Marine Science for a living, Mary is pretending to not be aware that water quality and clarity are increasing regardless of geography.
That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
Magnificently, she puts forward the general “despite the high temperatures” to obscure the fact that the climate is, in fact, cooling markedly.
Here’s Marjy Friedrichs picture:
(Marjy Friedrichs, professor at William and Mary’s Virginia Institute of Marine Science, who described the smallest Chesapeake Bay dead zone in history, 46% below average as “low levels of hypoxia”, said it was "truly surprising”, and that it was caused by “our nutrient reduction strategies”.
For those unaware, anytime someone says “truly”, they are lying bald-facedly.)
I have included Marjy’s picture so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist Freemason in a position of marginal influence looks like.
Generational Satanists are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth.
It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
Jeff Miller, Honolulu, HI, February 16, 2024
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, please send me a note at [email protected]
