From 2024 to 2025, the bird species count in India’s Periyar Tiger Reserve increased by 194.8%, or by basically three times, and four new bird species appeared there for the first time in history

These are from news stories I’m reading in the Times of India.

From 2024 to 2025, the tiger population in India’s Periyar Tiger Reserve increased by 23.3%, or by almost one fourth, from 30 to 37.

The Times of India’s V. Ayyappan omitted the percentage, and described it with the hedging generality “a marginal increase in tiger count”.

Where “count” falsely implies that nearly a fourth more tigers had been out there in the Reserve, all along, only nobody had counted them with the proper skill or assiduousness, previously.

marginal - adjective - very small in amount or effect

An increase of nearly one fourth cannot in good faith be described as “very small”.

I have exposed the duplicity of V. Ayyappan and the Times of India by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.

The graphic accompanying the article states “Tigers identified - 30”, which fraudulently uses the 2024 number, and omits the correct count of 37 for 2025, reducing it by 18.9%, from 37 to 30.

The Coincidence Theorist will explain it away as a “simple error”.

The omission of the exponential percentage increase in the tiger population, the hedging generality “a marginal increase” and the redacting of the 2025 tiger population are all examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.

From 2024 to 2025, the bird species count in India’s Periyar Tiger Reserve increased by 194.8%, or by basically three times, or by 228 species, from 117 species to 345 species.

The Times of India’s V. Ayyappan omitted the percentage, and described it with the hedging generality “bringing the reserve’s avian count to 345 species”.

Where the general “avian” redacts the specific “bird”, and also redacts “species”. And where “count” to falsely implies that a couple of hundred of extra bird species had been there in the Reserve all along, only nobody had counted them with the proper skill or assiduousness, previously.

Those are examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.

Allowing for the four new species of bird which had never been documented there previously, this statistic shows that 224 previously-documented species which had not been present in the Periyar Tiger Reserve in 2024 where, somehow, present there the next year, in 2025.

The Times of India’s V. Ayyappan did not offer any suggestion as to why they hadn’t been there the previous year. He’s desperate to keep you from recognizing that they have winked back into existence there as the ether has returned to health to the point where they can once again manifest within it.

The health of the ether is inexorably improving, and the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism vary directly with the health of the ether.

In 2025, four new species were documented in India’s Periyar Tiger Reserve - Bluethroat, Tawny Pipit, Ultramarine Flycatcher and Red-Breasted Flycatcher.

The Times of India’s V. Ayyappan referred to them with the hedging generality “four new records”, to redact the specific “four new bird species”, and did not offer any explanation as to where they might have come from, or how they might have gotten there.

Those are examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.

The propagandist V. Ayyappan is trying desperately to keep you from recognizing that these four species have winked into existence there for the first time in history, as the ether has increased in health to health to the point where they can manifest within it.

The health of the ether is inexorably improving, and the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism vary directly with the health of the ether.

Here’s a picture of V. Ayyappan, in a Satanic-purple shirt, agains a Satanic-green Kabbalist “Tree of Life” background.

V. Ayyappan
(V. Ayyappan, Deputy Editor, the Times of India)

I have included his picture so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist of marginal influence looks like.

From June 2025 to August 2025, 230 oriental darters were documented in the Pallikaranal marshland in India. The species had never been documented there previously.

In an article on the subject, the Times of India’s P. Oppili described it as “unusual activity” and “changed breeding behavior”, and quoted birder Chandra-kumar as saying “this is unusual”.

Where “unusual activity”, “changed breeding behavior” and “this is unusual” are all hedging generalities.

Chennai district forest officer V.A. Saravanan said it was because of “altered migration cycles or to improved ecological conditions”.

Where “altered migration cycles” and “improved ecological conditions” are both hedging generalities.

They’re all trying desperately to keep you from recognizing that the oriental darter has winked into existence there for the first time in history, as the ether has increased in health to health to the point where they can manifest within it.

The health of the ether is inexorably improving, and the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism vary directly with the health of the ether.

Here’s a picture of the Times of India’s P. Oppili, where the image is constructed to focus attention on his left eye.

P. Oppili
(The Times of India’s Environmental Editor P. Oppili)

I have included his picture so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist of marginal influence looks like.

On August 25, 2025, the Times of India printed the photograph of a barn owl with a pair of crows, with the caption “Unexpected Guest”, and the tagline “My neck of the woods - Crows meet a barn owl, rarely seen during the day, at Thiru Nagar Park, Villivakam”.

Where the hedging generality “unexpected guest” falsely implies that the barn owl has traveled in from some unknown location for some unknown reason.

When, in fact, Thiru Nagar Park is in the middle of densely populated Chennai.

Here, “rarely seen” redacts “never seen”, and “rarely seen during the day” redacts “never seen”.

The hedging generality “rarely seen during the day” falsely implies that barn owls have been in Chennai during the day all along, only nobody had looked for them with the proper skill or assiduousness, previously, and that they’re a common sight in Chennai at night.

When, in fact, the barn owl has winked into existence in Chennai as the ether has improved in health to the point where the species could manifest within it.

Jeff Miller, Chennai, India, August 26, 2025

If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected].