“It is only prudent never to place complete confidence in that by which we have even once been deceived.”
― René Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy
THE DATA
From March 2016 to October 2023, Americans who said that science had a mostly negative effect on society increased by 100%, or doubled, from 4% to 8%.
But, then, that’s what weaponizing a Chinese bat virus at U.S. taxpayer expense will do to one’s reputation.
From March 2016 to October 2023, Americans who said that science had a mostly negative effect on society increased by a monthly average of 1%.
From January 2019 to October 2023, Americans who said that science had a mostly positive effect on society decreased by 21.9%, from 73% to 57%.
Pew Research’s Brian Kennedy described it as “down 16 points” and “since before the start of the coronavirus outbreak”.
From January 2019 to February 2021, the 4% average monthly increase in Americans who said that science had a mostly negative effect on society was 300% greater, or four times greater than its 1% average monthly increase from March 2016 to October 2023.
From January 2019 to February 2021, Americans who said that science had a mostly negative effect on society increased by a monthly average of 4%.
From April 2020 to October 2023, Americans with not to much or no confidence in scientists to act in the public’s best interested increased by 125%, or well more than doubled, from 12% to 27%.
Pew Research’s Brian Kennedy omitted the percentage, and described it only-generally as “trust in scientists has fallen”, where “fallen” is a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer.
From 2023 to 2024, trust in the news in New Zealand decreased by 9%, from 42% to 33%.
From 2023 to 2024, the proportion of those who actively avoid the news increased by 6%, from 69% to 75%.
Dr. Merja Myllylahti, JMAD co-director and co-author of the report said it was because “In general, people distrust the information they see, and they are increasingly checking their ‘facts’ themselves. This phenomenon is highly problematic.”
As you can see, the populace in New Zealand has exposed the duplicity of the news media in New Zealand by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In 2024, the 25% of the populace in New Zealand which does not actively avoid the news is identical to the twenty to thirty percent of the populace comprised by generational Satanist Freemasons, all compelled to vote “Party line” on the issue.
In 2024, the 33% of the populace in New Zealand which trusts the news is just about equal to the twenty to thirty percent of the populace comprised by generational Satanist Freemasons, all compelled to vote “Party line” on the issue.
THE ARTICLES
NOVEMBER 2023
On November 14, 2023, pewresearch.org said “Americans’ Trust in Scientists, Positive Views of Science Continue to Decline”.
Where author Brian Kennedy said “decline” in place of a far-more-impactful percentage because they know that 70% of readers only read the headlines, and their hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the specific speed and scope of the sudden, exponential decrease in trust which they are attempting to obfuscate.
They also used “decline” because it is softer than “decreased”, and because declines are gradual.
The article goes on to say “Overall, 57% of Americans say science has had a mostly positive effect on society. This share is down 8 percentage points since November 2021 and down 16 points since before the start of the coronavirus outbreak.”
Where Brian did what little he could to hedge by listing the decreases in points, versus percentages, because points are smaller than percentages.
As a bonus, Pew Research’s Brian Kennedy “buried” all of the data in a separate table. If just 30% of readers actually read the article, what percentage do you think actually read the data in the tables?
It is an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
Here’s a screen shot of the table:
(Pew Research Science data)
Here’s how an honest person would have written it:
From January 2019 to October 2023, Americans who said that science had a mostly positive effect on society decreased by 21.9%, from 73% to 57%.
Pew Research’s Brian Kennedy described it as “down 16 points” and “since before the start of the coronavirus outbreak”.
From November 2021 to October 2023, Americans who said that science had a mostly positive effect on society decreased by 12.3%, from 65% to 57%.
Pew Research’s Brian Kennedy described it as “down 8 percentage points”.
Now I’m going to pull information from the table which Brian carefully left unmentioned.
From March 2016 to October 2023, Americans who said that science had a mostly negative effect on society increased by 100%, or doubled, from 4% to 8%.
From March 2016 to October 2023, Americans who said that science had a mostly negative effect on society increased by a monthly average of 1%.
From January 2019 to February 2021, the 4% average monthly increase in Americans who said that science had a mostly negative effect on society was 300% greater, or four times greater than its 1% average monthly increase from March 2016 to October 2023.
From January 2019 to February 2021, Americans who said that science had a mostly negative effect on society increased by 100%, or doubled, from 3% to 6%.
From January 2019 to February 2021, Americans who said that science had a mostly negative effect on society increased by a monthly average of 4%.
The article goes on to say:
“As trust in scientists has fallen, distrust has grown: Roughly a quarter of Americans (27%) now say they have not too much or no confidence in scientists to act in the public’s best interests, up from 12% in April 2020.”
Where Pew Research’s Brian Kennedy said “fallen” and “grown” because they are general.
Those are examples of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
Brian said “fallen” as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer.
(The Fall of the Rebel Angels, by Pieter Breuger the Elder, the Netherlands, 1562)
From April 2020 to October 2023, Americans with not to much or no confidence in scientists to act in the public’s best interested increased by 125%, or well more than doubled, from 12% to 27%.
Pew Research’s Brian Kennedy omitted the percentage, and described it only-generally as “trust in scientists has fallen”, where “fallen” is a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer.
Here’s a picture of Pew Research’s Brian Kennedy, with a Satanic green background, and where the image is constructed to focus attention on his left eye:
(Pew Research’s Brian Kennedy)
The image is constructed to focus attention on his left eye because, to generational Satanist Freemasons like Pew Research’s Brian Kennedy, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or the “eye of Horus”.
But don’t take my word for it:
‘The right eye is the Eye of Ra and the left is the Eye of Horus’.”
From “Freemasonry - Religion And Belief - The 3rd Temple”
Facebook: “Welcome to the Left-Hand-Path-Network, where Satanism is not about worship, but it’s study.”
I have included Brian’s picture so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist Freemason in a position of marginal influence looks like.
He figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.
It’s not like these people aren’t right up front about what they’re doing, and what they’re into.
We’ve just been conditioned, over literally Millennia, not to “notice” it.
Generational Satanists are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth.
It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
How long do you think that these people have left in power, now?
Please consider doing what you can to help speed the transition.
APRIL 2024
On April 8, 2024, AUT New Zealand said “Trust in news declines rapidly in 2024”.
Where the uncredited author from the AUT research centre for Journalism, Media and Democracy (JMAD) used the general “declines rapidly” in place of a far-more-impactful percentage because they know that 70% of readers only read the headlines, and their hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the specific speed and scope of the sudden, exponential decrease in trust which they are attempting to obfuscate.
They also used “decline” because it is softer than “decreased”, and because declines are gradual.
For those unaware, anytime an author is uncredited, it is proof that said author is an Intelligence operative.
The uncredited Intelligence operative from AUT New Zealand went on to say "The AUT research centre for Journalism, Media and Democracy (JMAD) has published its fifth annual Trust in News in Aotearoa New Zealand report, authored by Dr Merja Myllylahti and Dr Greg Treadwell. The 2024 report finds that while interest in news in New Zealand is high compared to 46 other markets, trust in news continues rapidly to decline, and news avoidance is increasing.
The study’s findings show trust in news in general fell significantly from 42% in 2023 to 33% (-9%) in 2024 and the proportion of those who actively avoid the news to some extent grew from 69% in 2023 to 75% (+6%) in 2024."
The uncredited Intelligence operative said “rapidly to decline” to avoid the plainspoken “declined rapidly”, and said “decline” because it is softer than “decreased”, and because declines are gradual.
They went on to say “fell significantly” because it is general. They said “fell” because it is softer than “decreased”, but mostly as a thinly veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer.
(The fall of Lucifer, from "Paradise Lost’, by John Milton, 1667)
The curiously-uncredited author from AUT New Zealand did what little they could to hedge by listing the percentage decreases last.
Here’s how an honest person would have written it:
From 2023 to 2024, trust in the news in New Zealand decreased by 9%, from 42% to 33%.
AUT New Zealand described it as “fell significantly”.
From 2023 to 2024, the proportion of those who actively avoid the news increased by 6%, from 69% to 75%.
AUT New Zealand described it as “grew”.
In 2024, the 25% of the populace in New Zealand which does not actively avoid the news is identical to the twenty to thirty percent of the populace comprised by generational Satanist Freemasons.
In 2024, the 33% of the populace in New Zealand which trusts the news is just about equal to the twenty to thirty percent of the populace comprised by generational Satanist Freemasons.
The article goes on to say “Journalism has lost its authority as the main source of news and information. In general, people distrust the information they see, and they are increasingly checking their ‘facts’ themselves. This phenomenon is highly problematic, says Dr Merja Myllylahti, JMAD co-director and co-author of the report.”
The populace in New Zealand has proven the duplicity of journalists there by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
Which is, indeed, highly problematic for generational Satanist Freemasons there, such as the AUT research centre for Journalism, Media and Democracy’s Dr. Merja Myllylahti.
Here’s a picture of her/him, where the image is constructed to focus attention on the left eye, and where they are using their left hand to make a purportedly-secret Masonic “gesture of recognition” to their chin:
(Dr. Merja Myllylahti, who said that the fact that New Zealanders distrusted journaists and were increasingly checking their facts themselves was “highly problematic”. )
Now here’s a picture of Theosophy co-founder Helena Blavatsky, where the image is also constructed to focus attention on her left eye, and where she is also using her left hand to make the same purportedly-secret Masonic “gesture of recognition” that Dr. Merja Myllylahti is in the image immediately above:
(Theosophy co-founder Helena Blavatsky, 1870’s)
And, for any Coincidence theorist lingering in the readership, here is the Linkedin profile picture of a Software Engineer, where the image is constructed to focus attention on his left eye, and where he’s making the same. purportedly-secret Masonic “gesture of recognition” that we’ve reviewed in the two photographs immediately above.
(Software Engineer)
The images are all constructed to focus attention on his left eye because, to generational Satanist Freemasons, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or the “eye of Horus”.
But don’t take my word for it:
‘The right eye is the Eye of Ra and the left is the Eye of Horus’.”
From “Freemasonry - Religion And Belief - The 3rd Temple”
Facebook: “Welcome to the Left-Hand-Path-Network, where Satanism is not about worship, but it’s study.”
I have included these photographs so that you could get a better idea of what generational Satanist Freemasons in a positions of varying influence look like, down through the generations.
They figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.
It’s not like these people aren’t right up front about what they’re doing, and what they’re into.
We’ve just been conditioned, over literally Millennia, not to “notice” it.
Generational Satanists are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth.
It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
How long do you think that these people have left in power, now?
Please consider doing what you can to help speed the transition.
Jeff Miller, Honolulu, HI, June 4, 2024
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, please send me a note at [email protected].
