'Tis surprising to see how rapidly a panic will sometimes run through a country. All nations and ages have been subject to them. Britain has trembled like an ague at the report of a French fleet of flat-bottomed boats; and in the fifteenth century the whole English army, after ravaging the kingdom of France, was driven back like men petrified with fear; and this brave exploit was performed by a few broken forces collected and headed by a woman, Joan of Arc. Would that heaven might inspire some Jersey maid to spirit up her countrymen, and save her fair fellow sufferers from ravage and ravishment! Yet panics, in some cases, have their uses; they produce as much good as hurt. Their duration is always short; the mind soon grows through them, and acquires a firmer habit than before. But their peculiar advantage is, that they are the touchstones of sincerity and hypocrisy, and bring things and men to light, which might otherwise have lain forever undiscovered. In fact, they have the same effect on secret traitors, which an imaginary apparition would have upon a private murderer. They sift out the hidden thoughts of man, and hold them up in public to the world. Many a disguised Tory has lately shown his head, that shall penitentially solemnize with curses the day on which Howe arrived upon the Delaware.
From “The American Crisis, No. 1”, by Thomas Paine, 1776
“There appears to be what is called ‘generational satanists,’ and they bring up their children to participate in the way that they themselves have as children,” Farnell said. He alleged that the sisters were abused by their grandparents as well as by their father (now deceased), their mother and other adults in rituals that took place in caves, probably in the San Bernardino mountains.
“These are things that are admittedly quite bizarre, but these things do happen, they have happened and they can be documented by people other than these three victims,” Farnell said. “The people who perpetuate these kinds of offenses should realize that they are not safe from their victims’ remembering and coming after them.”
From “Forced to Kill Her Baby, Woman Says”, the Los Angeles Times, March 21, 1991
“The swing of his nature took him from extreme languor to devouring energy; and as I knew well, he was never so truly formidable as when, for days on end, he had been lounging in his armchair amid his improvisations and his black-letter editions. Then it was that the lust of the chase would suddenly come upon him, and that his brilliant reasoning power would rise to the level of intuition, until those who were unacquainted with his methods would look askance at him as on a man whose knowledge was not that of other mortals. When I saw him that afternoon so enwrapped in the music of St. James’s Hall I felt that an evil time might be coming upon those whom he had set himself to hunt down.”
Dr. John Watson, from “The Red Headed League”, by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, 1891
[image]
(Robert Downey, Jr., as Sherlock Holmes, from “Sherlock Holmes, Game of Shadows”, 2011
“I cry you mercy!” interrupted the Chancellor, who saw a dangerous enthusiasm rising in the King’s face. “March upon Paris? Does your Excellency forget that the way bristles with English strongholds?”
“That for your English strongholds!” and Joan snapped her fingers scornfully. “Whence have we marched in these last days? From Gien. And whither? To Rheims. What bristled between? English strongholds. What are they now? French ones—and they never cost a blow!” Here applause broke out from the group of generals, and Joan had to pause a moment to let it subside. “Yes, English strongholds bristled before us; now French ones bristle behind us. What is the argument? A child can read it. The strongholds between us and Paris are garrisoned by no new breed of English, but by the same breed as those others—with the same fears, the same questionings, the same weaknesses, the same disposition to see the heavy hand of God descending upon them. We have but to march!—on the instant—and they are ours, Paris is ours, France is ours!”
From “Saint Joan of Arc”, by Mark Twain, 1896
[image]
(Cover, “Saint Joan of Arc”, by Mark Twain, 1896)
con·fi·dence game - confidence trick; plural noun: confidence tricks; noun: confidence game; plural noun: confidence games
a swindle in which the victim is persuaded to trust the swindler in some way.
COVID-19 - noun - A highly contagious respiratory disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
-id - suffix
of or pertaining to; appended to words to make an English adjective or noun form.
Forming nouns from Latin or Greek roots, being suffixed to the name of their progenitors and meaning “descendant(s) of”
Covin - noun -from Old French, from medieval Latin convenium, from Latin convenire (see convene).
a. collusive agreement between two or more persons to the detriment of a third: conspiracy. b archaic : fraud, trickery
Compare with coven:
Coven - noun - mid 17th century: variant of covin.
a group or gathering of witches who meet regularly.
often derogatory
a secret orclose-knit group of associates.
“covens of militants within the party”
-īnus (feminine -īna, neuter -īnum); first/second-declension suffix
Of or pertaining to; -ine; usually indicates a relationship of position, possession, or origin.
Descendants[edit]
Catalan: -í
English: -ine
French: -in
Galician: -iño, -ino
Italian: -ino
Portuguese: -ino, -inho
Romanian: -in
Spanish: -ino
THE DATA
From 2017 to 2022, the percentage of readers who avoid the news increased by 31% , from 29% to 38%.
From April 2021 to December 2021, the percentage of Conservatives in the U.K. who distrusted Boris Johnson on coronavirus increased by 121%, or well more than doubled , from 19% to 42%.
From April 2021 to December 2021, the percentage of the U.K. public who distrusted Boris Johnson on the pandemic increased by 100%, or doubled, from 31% to 62%.
From April 2021 to December 2021, the percentage of Conservative voters in the U.K. who distrusted the government increased by 83%, from 24% to 44%.
From April 2021 to December 2021, the percentage of those aged 55 to 75 in the U.K. who distrusted the government increased by 40%, from 42% to 59%.
From April 2021 to December 2021, the percentage of 55 to 75 year olds in the U.K. who distrusted Boris Johnson on coronavirus increased by 36% , from 44% to 60%.
From April 2021 to December 2021, the percentage of those aged 55 to 75 in the U.K. who felt that the government usually does the right thing decreased by 32% , from 44% to 30%.
From April 2021 to December 2021, Conservatives in the U.K. who felt the government usually does the right thing decreased by 30%, from 65% to 45%.
From April 2021 to December 2021, the percentage of the populace in the U.K. who felt the government usually does the right thing decreased by 26% , from 38% to 28%.
From April to December 2021, the percentage of the U.K. public who said that the Covid-19 pandemic had decreased their trust in the government increased by 25% , from 36% to 45%.
From April 2021 to December 2021, the percentage of the U.K. public who distrusted Boris Johnson on coronavirusincreased by 24% , from 50% to 62%.
From April 2021 to December 2021, the percentage of citizens in the U.K. who felt the government was dishonest and untruthful increased by 23% , from 47% to 58%.
From April 2021 to December 2021, the percentage of those in the U.K. who did not believe the government increased by 17% , from 52% to 62%.
In December 2021, 69% of people in the U.K. distrusted Boris Johnson.
In December 2021, 68% of people in the U.K. distrusted Kier Starmer.
In December 2021, 62% of people in the U.K. distrusted Boris Johnson on Covid.
In December 2021, 53% of people in the U.K. distrusted Keir Starmer on Covid.
in 2022, regardless of nationality, 5 8% of people distrusted the news most of the time.
In 2022, 55% of Australians distrusted all institutions. BBS Australia said it was due to “leadership missteps” and “misinformation”.
The Australian public briefly bought the false assertion that the Chinese bat virus had only-accidentally mutated. When they figured out that it had been genetically engineered with four amino acids added for improved transmissibility to humans, their trust in the institutions serially lying to them decreased precipitously.
In 2022, 55% of Australians felt that their media was a dividing force, rather than a unifying one.
In 2022, 52% of Australians felt that their government was a dividing force, rather than a unifying one
In 2022, 36% said the news “lowers their mood”.
THE ARTICLES
EXPONENTIALLY DECREASING TRUST IN THE U.K.
In February 2022, klc.ac.uk said “Trust in government fell in second year of Covid – but public still receptive to obeying rules that restrict freedoms”.
The article is uncredited. For those late to the party, anytime an author is uncredited, it is proof that said author is an Intelligence operative.
Did you notice that “trust fell” is general? The propagandist knows that, since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, the hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the scope and speed of the exponential decrease in trust I’m documenting here.
As a bonus, “fell” is also a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer.
The article goes on to say "Trust in government to tell the truth and do the right thing
In November/December 2021, 58% of the public disagreed that the UK government is honest and truthful – up from 47% in April 2021."
That’s gymnastically, Satanically inverted. From April 2021 to December 2021, the percentage of citizens in the U.K. who felt the government was dishonest and untruthful increased by 23%, from 47% to 58%.
The article goes on to say “The proportion of 2019 Conservative voters who felt this way almost doubled, rising from 24% to 44% over this period, while it rose from 42% to 59% among 55-to-75-year-olds – the biggest increase among any age group surveyed.”
From April 2021 to December 2021, the percentage of Conservative voters in the U.K. who distrusted the government increased by 83%, from 24% to 44%.
From April 2021 to December 2021, the percentage of those aged 55 to 75 in the U.K. who distrusted the government increased by 40%, from 42% to 59%.
The article goes on to say “There was a 10 percentage point decline in the belief that, in general, the UK government usually does the right thing, with 38% agreeing with this in April, falling to 28% in November/December.”
From April 2021 to December 2021, the percentage of the populace in the U.K. who felt the government usually does the right thing decreased by 26%, from 38% to 28%.
The article continues: “Again, Conservative voters saw a big change in views during this time: 49% said the UK government generally does the right thing – down from 65% earlier in the year. And 44% of those aged 55 to 75 felt this way in April, but that had fallen to 30% by November/December.”
From April 2021 to December 2021, Conservatives in the U.K. who felt the government usually does the right thing decreased by 30%, from 65% to 45%.
From April 2021 to December 2021, the percentage of those aged 55 to 75 in the U.K. who felt that the government usually does the right thing decreased by 32%, from 44% to 30%.
The article goes on to say “In April, 53% said they were unsure whether to believe the UK government, which rose to 62% in November/December.”
From April 2021 to December 2021, the percentage of those in the U.K. who did not believe the government increased by 17%, from 52% to 62%.
The article goes on to say “Trust and the pandemic -Towards the end of 2021, 45% of the UK public said that, looking back over the past couple of years, the overall experience of the Covid-19 pandemic had decreased their general level of trust in the UK government – up from 36% in April.”
From April to December 2021, the percentage of the U.K. public who said that the Covid-19 pandemic had decreased their trust in the government increased by 25%, from 36% to 45%.
The article goes on to say “Distrust of the prime minister’s leadership on the crisis also grew: In November/December, 62% of people said they didn’t trust Boris Johnson very much or not at all on issues related to coronavirus and the response to it, compared with 50% in April.”
From April 2021 to December 2021, the percentage of the U.K. public who distrusted Boris Johnson on coronavirus increased by 24%, from 50% to 62%.
The article goes on to say “At the end of last year, the public were twice as likely to distrust as trust Johnson on issues related to the pandemic (62% vs 31%).”
From April 2021 to December 2021, the percentage of the U.K. public who distrusted Boris Johnson on the pandemic increased by 100%, or doubled, from 31% to 62%.
The article goes on to say “The proportion of Conservative voters who said they distrusted the prime minister on these issues more than doubled during the course of 2021, rising from 19% in April to 42% in November/December.”
From April 2021 to December 2021, the percentage of Conservatives in the U.K. who distrusted Boris Johnson on coronavirus increased by 121%, or well more than doubled, from 19% to 42%.
The article goes on to say “44% of 55-to-75-year-olds said they distrusted Johnson on issues related to coronavirus in April, which rose to 60% in November/December.”
From April 2021 to December 2021, the percentage of 55 to 75 year olds in the U.K. who distrusted Boris Johnson on coronavirus increased by 36%, from 44% to 60%.
The article goes on to say “Towards the end of 2021, people were more likely to distrust Boris Johnson (62%) than Keir Starmer (53%) on issues linked to Covid – although virtually the same proportion said they actively trusted each on such issues (31% for Johnson; 32% for Starmer).”
That’s a gymnastic, Satanic inversion of: in December 2021, 62% of people in the U.K. distrusted Boris Johnson on Covid.
In December 2021, 53% of people in the U.K. distrusted Keir Starmer on Covid.
In December 2021, 69% of people in the U.K. distrusted Boris Johnson.
In December 2021, 68% of people in the U.K. distrusted Kier Starmer.
Here’s a picture of Kier Starmer, using a purportedly-secret Illuminist “gesture of recognition”. As a bonus it’s with his left hand:
[image]
Now here’s a picture of Boris Johnsonk using the same purportedly-secret Illuminist “gesture of recognition”:
[image]
For any Coincidence theorists lingering in the readership, we will now view some pictures of some lower-ranking generational Satanists, all using the same purportedly-secret “gesture of recognition” that Kier and Boris are in the photos immediately above:
[image]
(Director of Shared Services. Satanic green blouse. Purportedly-secret Illuminist “gesture of recognition” to chin)
[image]
(Web Developer. Satanic green shirt. Purple background. Purportedly-secret Illuminist hand “gesture of recognition” to chin)
[image]
(Product Engineer. Purportedly-secret Illuminist “gesture of recognition” to chin. With his left hand. Left eye dominant. The left eye is the “eye of Horus”)
[image]
(Software Engineer. Purportedly-secret Illuminist “gesture of recognition” to chin)
Lastly, here’s another photo of a high-ranking Illuminist, who is also using the same purportedly-secret “gesture of recognition” to chin:
[image]
(Elvis Presley making a purportedly-secret Illuminist hand gesture with his left hand)
I’ve included their photographs so that you could get a better idea of what generational Satanists in positions of varying influence look like.
They figured the rubes would never notice.
They’re all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth.
It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
EXPONENTIALLY DECREASING TRUST IN THE NEWS
In June 2022, reuters.com said “More people are avoiding the news, and trusting it less, report says”
Where author Helen Coster used the general “more people” and “trusting it less” because they’re general. As a propagandist, she knows that, since 60 to 70 percent of readers only read the healdines, her hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the exponential decrease in trust I’m documenting here.
She tacked the snide “report says” on the end to give the subconscious of the Coincidence theorist reader the green light to say “oh, but that was just one report!”, or “oh, but someone must have reported that incorrectly!”
Helen Coster knows that many or most readers will grasp any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The article goes on to say “A growing number of people are selectively avoiding important news stories such as the coronavirus pandemic, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and the cost-of-living crisis, according to a report released on Tuesday. While the majority of people surveyed consume news regularly, 38% said they often or sometimes avoid the news – up from 29% in 2017 – the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism said in its annual Digital News Report. Around 36% – particularly those under 35 – say that the news lowers their mood.”
From 2017 to 2022, the percentage of readers who avoid the news increased by 31%, from 29% to 38%.
In 2022, 36% said the news “lowers their mood”.
The article goes on to say “Trust in news is also declining, and is lowest in the United States. On average, 42% of people said they trust most news most of the time; that figure has fallen in almost half the countries in the report and risen in seven.”
Did you notice how author Helen Coster carefully didn’t give you anything to compare the decrease trust to? That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”. Helen Satanically inverted it. The truth is that, in 2022, 58% of people distrusted the news most of the time.
Here’s Helen Coster’s picture, where she’s wearing a Satanic purple blouse:
[image]
(Journalist Helen Coster, in Satanic purple blouse, who described a 31% increase in avoiding the news as “More people”.)
I’ve included her photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
They’re all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth.
It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
EXPONENTIALLY DECREASING TRUST IN AUSTRALIA
In July 2022, bbscommunicstions.com.au said “The trust bubble has burst – 2022 Edelman Trust Barometer Australian report launched”.
The article is uncredited. For those late to the party, anytime an article is uncredited, it is proof that said author is an Intelligence operative.
The article goes on to say “In 2022, the report highlighted an Australian society now operating on a default of distrust unless proven otherwise, as cited by 55 per cent of respondents.”
That’s a cloud of Mil-speak smoke for “In 2022, 55% of Australians distrusted all institutions”.
The article goes on to say “Following a 2021 Trust Barometer increase in trust levels towards the major institutions of government, media, business and NGOs – seemingly driven by the early response to the COVID-19 pandemic – levels have now fallen sharply.”
That’s a public that briefly bought the false assertion that the Chinese bat virus had only-accidentally mutated. When they figured out that it had been genetically engineered with four amino acids added for improved transmissibility to humans, their trust in the institutions serially lying to them decreased precipitously.
The article goes on to say “In line with a series of leadership missteps – and the persistent issue of misinformation – during the pandemic’s second year, respondents in this year’s study reported a decrease in trust levels for government (down 9 points), media (down 8 points), business (down 5 points) and NGOs (down 4 points).”
Where the only-general “leadership missteps” is Mil-speak for “falsely alleged that the Chinese bat virus had mutated and spread naturally”.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anythying. One of those variants is “alarmed”. That’s why the article goes on to say “Alarmingly, 2022 respondents considered media (55 per cent) and government (52 per cent) to now be dividing forces in society rather than unifying ones.”
In 2022, 55% of the Australian populace felt that their media was a dividing force, rather than a unifying one.
In 2022, 52% of the Australian populace felt that their government was a dividing force, rather than a unifying one
I’ve included her photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
They’re all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth.
It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
Jeff Miller, Gurnee, IL, July 28, 2022
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
