“The duplicity of others must always be shocking when one is unconscious of one’s own.”
― From “The Mask of Dimitrios”, by Eric Ambler, 1944
THE DATA
From March 2023 to March 2024, fears about the politicization of medical science increased by 26%, from to 51% to 64%.
From March 2023 to March 2024, trust in journalists to provide accurate healthcare information decreased by 10%, to 35%.
From March 2023 to March 2024, trust in CEO’s of healthcare companies to provide accurate healthcare information decreased by 7%, to 45%.
From March 2023 to March 2024, trust in Government leaders to provide accurate healthcare information decreased by decreased by 7%, to 39%.
Caitlin said that these sudden huge decreases in trust to the lowest level in history were “an enduring legacy of the COVID-19 pandemic”.
That’s a valuable half-truth, in that she’s having to admit that the public is pretty steamed that, in 2017, the U.S. government gave the godless Communist Red Chinese $3.7 million in U.S. tax dollars to weaponize a Chinese bat virus.
That’s the same year that Smithsonian Magazine widened its eyes to simulate honesty and questioned "In 2017, the Smithsonian Magazine widened its eyes to simulate honesty and asked “Is China Ground Zero for a Future Pandemic?”
The key to any successful Confidence game is misdirection.
THE ARTICLE
On April 18, 2024, axios.com said “Exclusive: More trust themselves to make health decisions”.
Where author Caitlin Owens said “more trust themselves” because “more” is general.
As a propagandist, Caitlin knows that seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and her hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the specific scope of the exponential decrease in trust in major institutions which she is attempting to obfuscate.
Did you notice how Caitlin carefully cut the word “healthcare” down to merely “health decisions”? That’s to make the subject less searchable.
It is an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
She said “more trust themselves”, to pointedly avoid saying “fewer trust major institutions”.
That’s an example of what is known as Black magic, which is almost always hidden behind the general meme “spin”.
The story goes on to say “Survey conducted March 4-13, 2024 with around 12,000 respondents from 12 countries”.
Then, using a time-honored propaganda technique, axios.com’s Caitlin Owens “buried” the data in an unsearchable table below. Here’s a copy of it for your convenience:
(Edelman Healthcare Trust-Decrease Data, March 2024)
From March 2023 to March 2024, trust in journalists to provide accurate healthcare information decreased by 10%, to 35%.
From March 2023 to March 2024, trust in CEO’s of healthcare companies to provide accurate healthcare information decreased by 7%, to 45%.
From March 2023 to March 2024, trust in Government leaders to provide accurate healthcare information decreased by d ecreased by 7%, to 39%.
But, then, that’s what weaponizing a Chinese bat virus at U.S. taxpayer expense will do to one’s reputation.
The 35% and 39% trust bases of journalists and Government leaders are highly instructive, given that we know that, at least here in the West, generational Satanist Freemasons comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are voting “Party line” on the issue when they speak with Edelman.
This means that a just a mere 5%, or perhaps 10% of the populace who are not in on the great Confidence game remain dupes of that Confidence game.
Self-described Con “artists” are not omniscient, nor are they omnipotent. They don’t have some magical power which allows them to run their game. So this can all be over anytime we collectively want it to be.
The article goes on to say “Declining confidence in major institutions is driving more people to trust their own ability to assess health information or turn to friends for guidance, indicates a new global Edelman Trust Barometer survey provided exclusively to Axios.”
Where the general “declining confidence” and “more people” are hedging generalities, put forward to compartmentalize awareness of the specific scope of the exponential decrease in trust in major institutions which axios.com’s Caitlin Owens is attempting to obfuscate.
Did you notice how she held to “more people trust their own ability”, to pointedly avoid saying “fewer people trust the ability of major institutions”.
That’s an example of what is known as Black magic, which is almost always hidden behind the general meme “spin”.
Caitlin said that these sudden huge decreases in trust to the lowest level in history was “an enduring legacy of the COVID-19 pandemic”.
“An enduring legacy”, my, that sounds fine!
That’s an example of what is known as Black magic, which is almost always hidden behind the general meme “spin”.
It is also a valuable half-truth, in that she’s having to admit that the public is pretty steamed that, in 2017, the U.S. government gave the godless Communist Red Chinese $3.7 million in U.S. tax dollars to weaponize a Chinese bat virus.
2017, which is the same year that Smithsonian Magazine widened its eyes to simulate honesty and questioned “Is China Ground Zero for a Future Pandemic ?”
The key to any successful Confidence game is misdirection.
But they’re not having it their own way, by any means. This is buried down lower still in the article: “Fears about the politicization of medical science have shot up, rising 13 percentage points in the past year to 64%. That puts it on par with concerns about health care affordability and the possibility of another pandemic.”
Where “shot up” is a hedging generality, behind which “13 percentage points” is another, given that points are smaller than percentages.
From March 2023 to March 2024, fears about the politicization of medical science increased by 26%, from to 51% to 64%.
Where “politicization of medical science” is Mil-speak for “taxpayer funded weaponized viruses”.
Axios.com’s Caitlin Owens omitted the percentage, and described it as “shot up by 13 points”, because points are smaller than percentages.
Here’s Caitlin Owens picture, in a Satanic purple top, and where the image is constructed to focus attention on her left eye:
(Axios.com’s Caitlin Owens)
The image features her left eye because, to generational Satanist Freemasons like Caitlin, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or the “eye of Horus”.
But don’t take my word for it:
‘The right eye is the Eye of Ra and the left is the Eye of Horus’.”
From “Freemasonry - Religion And Belief - The 3rd Temple”
Facebook: “Welcome to the Left-Hand-Path-Network, where Satanism is not about worship, but it’s study.”
I have included Caitlin’s picture so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist Freemason in a position of marginal influence looks like.
She figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise roughly twenty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth.
It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else."
I’m going to repeat this for emphasis:
Self-described Con “artists” are not omniscient, nor are they omnipotent. They don’t have some magical power which allows them to run their game.
So, this can all be over anytime we collectively want it to be.
And don’t forget: when con’s collapse, they do so in a rush, like a house of cards.
Jeff Miller, Honolulu, HI, April 22, 2024
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, please send me a note at [email protected]
