“The truest way to be deceived is to think oneself more knowing than others.”
― From “Maxims” by Francois de La Rochefoucauld, 1678
“Parsons was Winston’s fellow employee at the Ministry of Truth. He was a fattish but active man of paralyzing stupidity, a mass of imbecile enthusiasms–one of those completely unquestioning, devoted drudges on whom, more even than on the thought police, the stability of the Party depended.”
George Orwell, from “1984”, 1949
“Why you fool, it’s the educated reader who CAN be gulled. All our difficulty comes with the others. When did you meet a workman who believes the papers? He takes it for granted that they’re all propaganda and skips the leading articles. He buys his paper for the football results and the little paragraphs about girls falling out of windows and corpses found in Mayfair flats. He is our problem. We have to recondition him. But the educated public, the people who read the high-brow weeklies, don’t need reconditioning. They’re all right already. They’ll believe anything.”
From “That Hideous Strength”, by C.S. Lewis, 1945
THE DATA
From November 2020 to November 2021, public confidence in scientists and medical scientists decreased by 28%, from 40% to 29%.
From November 2020 to November 2021, public confidence in scientists to act in the public’s best interest decreased by 25%, from 39% to 29%.
And it is not shocking for me to say that is precisely what the barely-covert international release of a Chinese bat virus with four amino acids added for improved transmissibility to humans will do to one’s reputation.
In November 2021, less than one third of the public (29%) had confidence in scientists and medical scientists.
In November 2021, less than one third of the public (29%) had confidence in scientists to act in the public’s best interests. While Pew Research’s Brian Kennedy, Alec Tyson and Cary Funk describe it as “down by 10 percentage points”.
THE ARTICLES
In February 2022, pewresearch.org published "Americans’ Trust in Scientists, Other Groups Declines".
Where authors Brian Kennedy, Alec Tyson and Cary Funk used the only-general “trust declines” in place of the far more impactful, specific data on the decreases that, in journalistic parlance, they “buried” below. As propagandists, they know that, since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, this hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the scope of the sudden, exponential decrease in trust that I’m documenting here.
They used the word “decline” not only because it’s general, but also because it’s softer than “drop” or “decrease”, and because it echoes the word “recline”. Declines are gradual.
The subhead goes on to say “Republicans’ confidence in medical scientists down sharply since early in the coronavirus outbreak”. Can you see how they’re trying to divide and conquer, from the get go? Everybody’s trust is decreasing, and here the authors are trying to “compartmentalize” it merely to the Republicans.
The article goes on to say “Americans’ confidence in groups and institutions has turned downward compared with just a year ago. Trust in scientists and medical scientists, once seemingly buoyed by their central role in addressing the coronavirus outbreak, is now below pre-pandemic levels.”
Where “compared with just a year ago” attempts to, once again, “compartmentalize” the long, steady, ongoing and ever-increasing decrease in trust of the barely-closeted cabal of bloodline-linked generational Satanists who’ve been running the long con on humanity, well, all the way back to Babylon and before to merely “just a year ago”.
Did you notice how they didn’t mention how far it was below pre-pandemic levels? That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The article goes on to say “Chart shows public confidence in scientists and medical scientists has declined over the last year. Overall, 29% of U.S. adults say they have a great deal of confidence in medical scientists to act in the best interests of the public, down from 40% who said this in November 2020.”
Where the authors tacked “chart shows” on the front end of the first sentence to give the subconscious of the Coincidence theorist the green light to say “oh, they can make those charts show anything!” As propagandists, they know that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
But the math, the math. Remember we said how declines were gradual? Keep that in mind while I do the math like the shills Brian Kennedy, Alec Tyson and Cary Funk made me by printing the numbers, but refusing to provide the far more impactful percentage increase between them.
Shill - noun - an accomplice of a hawker, gambler, or swindler who acts as an enthusiastic customer to entice or encourage others.
From November 2020 to November 2021, public confidence in scientists and medical scientists decreased by 28%, from 40% to 29%.
In November 2021, less than one third of the public (29%) had confidence in scientists and medical scientists.
For those keeping score, a 28% decrease in one year is not gradual.
The article goes on to say “Similarly, the share with a great deal of confidence in scientists to act in the public’s best interests is down by 10 percentage points (from 39% to 29%), according to a new Pew Research Center survey.”
Where shills Brian Kennedy, Alec Tyson and Cary Funk did what little they could to hedge by saying it was “down 10 percentage points”, instead of plainly stating " down 10%". You score points. Points are positive. It’s bald-facedly obvious positive spin.
For those huffing and puffing in defense of the authors, I did the math - because I just don’t trust the generational Satanist sons and daughters of bitches.
And, will you look at that, the decrease from 39% to 29% is a TWENTY FIVE PERCENT DECREASE. Don Croft used to say “payback is a bitch”. That’s why I used the statistic as the click-bait headline of this article:
From November 2020 to November 2021, public confidence in scientists to act in the public’s best interest decreased by 25%, from 39% to 29%, to a level below that before the pandemic began.
In November 2021, less than one third (29%) of the public had confidence in scientists to act in the public’s best interests. And it’s not shocking for me to say that is precisely what the barely-covert international release of a Chinese bat virus with four amino acids added for improved transmissibility to humans will do to one’s reputation.
Pew’s shiny-shoed prostitutes go on to say “The new findings represent a shift in the recenttrajectory of attitudes toward medical scientists and scientists. Public confidence in both groups had increased shortly after the start of the coronavirus outbreak, according to an April 2020 survey. Current ratings of medical scientists and scientists have now fallen below where they were in January 2019, before the emergence of the coronavirus.”
From the beginning of the great Covid confidence game to its downfall, less than two years have passed.
Remember, when cons collapse, they do so in a rush, like a house of cards.
You know that the word “Covid” means "fraud, conspiracy, deception, right?
Conspiracy - noun - a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful.
Covin - noun - from Old French, from medieval Latin convenium, from Latin convenire (see convene).
collusive agreement between two or more persons to the detriment of a third : conspiracy. b archaic : fraud, trickery
-īnus (feminine -īna, neuter -īnum) - suffix - Of or pertaining to;
Catalan: -í
English: -ine
French: -in
Galician: -iño, -ino
Italian: -ino
Portuguese: -ino, -inho
Romanian: -in
Spanish: -ino
Covin, compare with coven:
Coven - noun - A group or gathering of witches who meet regularly; the word is a variant of covin (archaic term for fraud, deception)
En - suffix - of or pertaining to
Covid - an infectious disease caused by a newly discovered coronavirus
-id- suffix - of or pertaining to
As you can see, it’s not like they’re not up-front about where they’re into, and what they’re doing.
Years ago, at the dawn of the Orgonite movement, a double agent named Don Bradley said “the rule of evil has to be visible and in your face.”
He was doing it himself at that very moment - using conscious deception while maintaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.
It is our credulity, our seeing it and explaining it away, that allows the evil to exist, and continue.
The Pew Research hit-piece staggers on, like an undead zombie. I won’t bore you with most of it.
But here’s an interesting bit:
"Americans with higher levels of education express more positive views of scientists and medical scientists than those with lower levels of education, as has also been the case in past Center surveys. But education matters more in assessments by Democrats than Republicans.
Chart shows college-educated Democrats express high levels of confidence in medical scientists
Democrats and Democratic leaners with at least a college degree express a high level of confidence in medical scientists: 54% have a great deal of confidence and 95% have at least a fair amount of confidence in medical scientists to act in the public’s interests. By comparison, a smaller share of Democrats who have not graduated from college have confidence in medical scientists."
C.S. Lewis said it far more concisely than I can:
“Why you fool, it’s the educated reader who CAN be gulled. All our difficulty comes with the others. When did you meet a workman who believes the papers? He takes it for granted that they’re all propaganda and skips the leading articles. He buys his paper for the football results and the little paragraphs about girls falling out of windows and corpses found in Mayfair flats. He is our problem. We have to recondition him. But the educated public, the people who read the high-brow weeklies, don’t need reconditioning. They’re all right already. They’ll believe anything.”
From “That Hideous Strength”, by C.S. Lewis, 1945
And, even more concisely, George Orwell:
“Parsons was Winston’s fellow employee at the Ministry of Truth. He was a fattish but active man of paralyzing stupidity, a mass of imbecile enthusiasms–one of those completely unquestioning, devoted drudges on whom, more even than on the thought police, the stability of the Party depended.”
George Orwell, from “1984”, 1949
And, most concisely:
“The truest way to be deceived is to think oneself more knowing than others.”
― From “Maxims” by Francois de La Rochefoucauld, 1678
The great news is that, once someone has seen through a con, or “confidence game”, as the self-described “Con Artists” who run such games call them, that trust can never be regained.
In the old days, they used to keep a packed suitcase under their bed, ready to leave town on the midnight train in case the rubes got wise.
Actually, to be fair, those were honest, two-bit grifters. While the big-time Confidence men and women were - and remain - up at the top of every last one of the pyramidally-architected control organizations in every city, town and village on Earth, wearing natty suits, grinning, using conscious deception while maintaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.
“The essential act of the Party is to use conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.”
Winston reading from Emmanuel Goldstein’s book, from “1984”, by George Orwell, 1949
Every last one of them schizoid sociopaths, from all the way back to Babylon, up to the present day. Engaging in human sacrifice and cannibalism on Saturday night, and going to church on Sunday morning, regardless of culture or geography.
But it is said, correctly, that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else.”
Here’s the author Brian Kennedy’s picture, where he’s carefully positioned in front of a Satanic green background:
(The Pew Research Center’s Brian Kennedy, carefully positioned in front of a Satanic green background)
Here’s author Alec Tyson’s picture, where he’s wearing a Satanic purple tie:
(The Pew Research Center’s Brian Kennedy, wearing a Satanic purple tie)
Here’s author Cary Funk, wearing a Satanic purple blouse:
[image]
(The Pew Research Center’s Cary Funk, wearing a Satanic purple blouse)
For any Coincidence theorists huffing and puffing in the readership, here’s another picture of Cary, wearing a Satanic purple blazer:
[image]
(The Pew Research Center’s Cary Funk, wearing a Satanic purple blazer, standing in front of a background that says “tell the truth”)
To maintain current programming levels, stop reading immediately, breathe through your mouth and affirm “Cary just really likes purple!”, or “oh, purple is the hot color, right now!”
The grim humor of the photo immediately above is that Cary is using conscious deception while maintaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty while standing in front of a background that reads “tell the truth”.
It is what is known in criminal parlance as a “Confidence game”.
I’ve included the authors’ photographs so that you could get a better idea of what generational Satanists in positions of marginal influence look like.
They’re all related to one another by bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth.
It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else.”
The great news is that just 29% of the public has confidence in scientists and medical scientists.
My research to this point has shown that roughly twenty to thirty percent of the populace is comprised of bloodline-linked generational Satanists. Thus, the 29% of the public that has confidence in scientists and medical scientists are all or mostly generational Satanists, voting Party-line in a united bloc. And every other last one of us has gotten wise to the con.
At this writing, 71% of the populace - a supermajority - do not have confidence in scientists and medical scientists. The confidence that is crucial for the execution of the great “Confidence game” is gone, and, once trust is lost, in cannot and will not ever be regained.
So, it’s all over but the crying for these miscreants. It’s just willful disbelief on the part of the public and the complete control of the media by the Con artists that skews the view to make it seem as if it is not so.
No bother feel no way
It’s coming close to payday I say
No bother feel no way
Every man get paid accord his work this day
From “Feel No Way”, by Peter Tosh, 1983
Jeff Miller, Honolulu, HI, April 20, 2022
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
