“Mr. Bond, they have a saying in Chicago. The first time it’s happenstance. The second time, it’s coincidence. But the third time it’s enemy action.”
Ian Fleming, from ‘Goldfinger’
Edu, I’m with you re: spraying as a DOR environment builder and stabilizer for the purposes of dark entity manifestation support.
O.J., your follow up to Don reads that the ‘Dragon Sylph’ is your ‘personal creational thought impression’ - which latter phrase exemplifies, from my perspective, the wandering, Dr. Bronner’s label-esque flavor of that whole post. I hadn’t heard the term ‘Dragon Sylph’ used previously, so I guess you ‘coined the phrase’.
Don said ‘that’s a trigger’, you replied ‘I know’.
So from my perspective you gave your subjective impression and moved forward with a trigger name for it as the top choice, despite the negative implications previously known to you. The use of proper-noun-capitals (‘Dragon Sylph’) for this new, innocent and only-triggering-to-some word is to me noteworthy.
‘How to train your dragon’, ‘Puff the Magic Dragon’, the list of Establishment ‘dragons are cute and cuddly!’ memes is voluminous. Wheras my unswayed perspective maps against that of Bob Marley on a rearing white horse slaying one with a lance on the cover of ‘Confrontation.’ If you go East, it doesn’t get rosier for me. I may go research Yakuza tattoos and weigh back in, here. ‘Chasing the dragon’ is a term for smoking heroin.
(This is how neurolinguistic programming works - and how it is deconstructed.)
I think that your saying ‘an indigenous person told me Sylphs show up at their events’ covers the subject with the mantle of the almost un-criticizable ‘indigenous peoples’ spirituality’ meme so deftly manipulated by the New Age movement. Whereas Sylphs show up everywhere positive energy stuff is going on, as Carlos noted.
I think it’s interesting that you don’t use the name of the Canadian First Nations man. I also think it’s interesting that don’t have serial pictures of the so-strikingly-dragon-like Sylphs that are repeatedly showing up, every time you make a batch of TB’s, if I’m reading correctly. Yet you have tons and tons of other pictures in your posts, all the time. And you say you took a picture (one of those many times you repeatedly saw a ‘Dragon Sylph’) and showed that photo to someone else. Whom, then, did you show it to? Why, once again, no name? And, why, then, aren’t you showing it to us, if it’s so intense and exciting and compelling?
From my perspective, Ahriman, and Death, and Dragons (to name only a few of many) are powerful entities, and are inherently, well, themselves, and hold their proper places within this reality. Yet a twisted few, the folks we talk about a lot on this forum, give them too much emphasis, nay, worship them. Or use those entities’ names, constructs and symbolism to mislead others. One name for the folks I’m referencing is ‘the Serpent Cult’, precioussss. They, and their symbols, are not cute, nor are they cuddly, from my subjective perspective.
The flag of Milan, Italy, features a crowned serpent biting a dude in half (or, to be fair, swallowing him down whole), which imagery the folks in charge used nearly identically when they invaded and forced their human sacrifice cult on the people of the ‘new world’ under the guise of (fair-skinned, blue-eyed) ‘Quetzalcoatl’. I guess they figured the rubes would never notice, as it was a rebranding in a totally new market. Former Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi has a great big one on his lawn. The What To Think stories say the crowned serpent is ‘giving birth’ to the human (with waving arms!) in it’s mouth, so that interperetation can be used to maintain current cuddly-dragon programming levels, if you like. But I digress.
I recall a significant discussion early in your tenure on the forum that involved serial use of avowedly-innocently-tabled trigger words in posts. Just a coincidence, I’m certain.