If the blue sucker is native to the Mississippi River, and Iowa, Illinois, Tennessee, Arkansas and Alabama are all on the Mississippi, then why don’t any of them have state records for the blue sucker?

“Treachery and violence are spears pointed at both ends: they wound those who resort to them, worse than their enemies.”

From “Wuthering Heights”, by Emily Brontë, 1847“

THE DATA

Wikipedia - “The Blue Sucker is native to the United States and Mexico. In the U.S., it lives in the Mississippi River basin north to Minnesota and Wisconsin. The Blue Sucker also lives in the Missouri River drainage to North Dakota and South Dakota and Montana. This species can also be found in the Gulf drainage from the Sabine River to the Rio Grande.”

If the blue sucker is native to the Mississippi River, and the Mississippi rises in Minnesota and passes through Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, Mississippi and Alabama, then why don’t Iowa, Illinois, Tennesse, Arkansas and Alabama have state records for the blue sucker?

If the blue sucker is native to the Missouri River, and the Missouri rises in Montana and passes through North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Iowa, Kansas and Missouri, then why don’t Iowa and Kansas have state records for the blue sucker?

If the blue sucker is native to the Sabine river in Texas, then why doesn’t Texas have a state record for the blue sucker?

On November 18, 1986, Bob Thoene caught the Nebraska state record blue sucker in the Missouri river. It weighed 18 pounds, 14 ounces.

On February 28, 1987, the Minnesota state record blue sucker weighed 14 pounds, 3 ounces, was 30 inches in length and 20.25 inches in girth. It was caught in the Mississippi river near Alma, Minnesota.

From 1986 to 1987, the blue sucker decreased in size by 25%, from 18 pounds 14 ounces (Nebraska) to 14 pounds, 3 ounces (Minnesota).

On April 28, 1988, Larry Peters caught the South Dakota state record blue sucker in the Missouri river at Fort Randall. It weighed 12 pounds, 7 ounces.

From 1987 to 1988, the blue sucker decreased in size by 12% , from 14 pounds, 3 ounces (Minnesota) to 12 pounds, 7 ounces (South Dakota).

In 1997, the Missouri state record blue sucker weighed 9 pounds, 14 ounces.

From 1988 to 1997, the blue sucker decreased in size by 21%, from 12 pounds, 7 ounces (South Dakota) to 9 pounds, 14 ounces (Missouri).

From 1988 to 1997, the 21% decrease in size of the blue sucker was 75% greater than its 12% decrease in size from 1987 to 1988.

Here we see the blue sucker in the process of being driven out of existence by purportedly-harmless low-wavelength microwave radiation.

From 1997 to 2009, the blue sucker decreased in size by 16%, from 9 pounds, 14 ounces (Missouri) to 8.34 pounds (Kentucky).

On November 22, 2009, the Kentucky state record blue sucker was caught by Stacy L. Boik in the Ohio River. It weighed 8.34 pounds.

From 2009 to 2022, the blue sucker decreased in size by 67%, from 8.34 pounds (Nebraska) to 2 pounds, 12 ounces (Indiana).

From 2009 to 2022, the blue sucker is absent from the record.

In April 2022, the IGFA world record blue sucker was caught by Steve Wozniak in the White River in Indiana. It weighed 2 pounds, 12 ounces. The white river rises in Indiana and flows into the Wabash river, then in a general southwesterly direction to join the Mississippi River at Cairo, Illinois.

Why isn’t that allowedly world-record blue sucker from the White river in Indiana in 2022 currently listed as the Indiana state record?

If the 2022 IGFA world record blue sucker was caught in Indiana, then why is there no Indiana state record for the blue sucker?

Why are there no news accounts, zero, documenting this world record fish?

If the world record blue sucker from 2022 was caught in the White river in Illinois, and the white river passes from Indiana through Illinois to the Mississippi river at Cairo, IL, then why doesn’t Illinois have a state record for the blue sucker?

If the blue sucker is native to the Mississippi River, the Missouri River and the Sabine River, and the world record blue sucker was caught in the White river in Indiana in 2022, then why does a current Wikipedia article not list the White river as a habitat of the blue sucker?

How did the white sucker get from the Mississippi river all the way up through the Wasbash river to the white river?

Why is the world record blue sucker from 2022 2 pounds, 12 ounces, when everybody at the International Game Fishing Association knows that the five state record blue suckers from 1986 to 2009 ranged from 8.34 pounds to 18 pounds, 14 ounces?

From April 2022 to February 2022, the world record blue sucker increased in size by 311%, or more than tripled in size*, from 2 pounds, 12 ounces to 11 pounds, 5 ounces.

Wait, what? Such records are usually broken by tiny margins, as organisms grow in ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size. Right? What gives? Here, the record stood for just ten months, and then was suddenly broken by a hyper-exponential, historically-unprecedented margin.

[image]

(Travis Uebinger, with the current IGFA world record blue sucker and Missouri state record blue sucker, from February 2023, which weighed 11 pounds, 5 ounces, and yet is still, somehow, 40% smaller than the 18-pound, 14-ounce Nebraska state record blue sucker from 1986).

The truth is that, sometime after 2009, the blue sucker was driven out of existence by purportedly-harmless low-wavelength microwave radiation, and would remain absent for over a decade, until it suddenly reappeared in 2022 at a thin threshold weight of 2 pounds, 12 ounces, when the etheric environment returned to a level of health where it could once again manifest on this plane.

From 1986 to 2009, the blue sucker decreased in size by 56%, from 18 pounds, 14 ounces to 8.34 pounds. That’s the toll taken by the purportedly-harmless low-wavelength microwave radiation poisoning the ether, and driving the species out of existence on this plane sometime soon after 2009.

It would remain absent for over a decade, until it suddenly reappeared in a locale which it had never previously inhabited, at a thin threshold weight of 2 pounds, 12 ounces on the White river in Indiana.

Bravely, brazenly, the IGFA has memory-holed all the rest of the state records from 1986 to 2009, because the first rule of Politics is “deny, deny, deny”.

I have exposed their duplicity by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.

How long do you think that these people have left in power, now?

Please consider doing what you can to help speed the process.

THE ARTICLES

On February 6, 2023, news-leader.com said “Blue sucker caught by Missouri man is first state record fish of 2023”.

Where author Sara Karnes said “caught” to reinforce the false meme that larger blue suckers had been out there in Missouri, all along, only nobody had fished for them with the proper skill or assiduousness, previously.

The article goes on to say “A Missouri man is now a world record holder after catching a blue sucker.”

Can you see how Sarah did what little she could to hedge by deviously walking “the world record holder” back to merely “a world record holder”?

We’ve just learned that the News Leader’s Sara Karnes blatantly omitted from the headline the fact that the blue sucker she’s referencing is the largest, ever, in the history of the world. As a propagandist, she knows that seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and hiding the fact that it was the largest of all time down in the body text goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the sudden, historically-unprecedented increase in size of the blue sucker which she is attempting to obfuscate.

The article goes on to say “Travis Uebinger, of Auxvasse, was fishing on the Osage River Jan. 15 when he caught an 11-pound, 5-ounce blue sucker using the pole-and-line method. The latest catch breaks the previous record from 1997 when a 9-pound, 14-ounce blue sucker was caught on the Missouri River.”

Wait, what? After mentioning that the state record she documented in the headline was, in fact, the largest blue sucker ever caught in the history of the world, Sara then bravely goes right back to prattling about the state record.

Say what you will about our literally-blood-drinking Illuminist friends, there is simply no quit in them.

“Fishing”, “caught”, “using the pole-and-line method” and “catch” are all in support of the false meme that larger blue suckers had been out there in Missouri, all along, only no one had fished for them with the proper skill or assiduousness, previously.

She really steps in it when she says that Travis was fishing. She’s piled on, and overplayed her hand. The innocent would plainly state “Travis caught the blue sucker”.

I’m guessing you noticed that, despite loving her some fish like writing about them is, in fact, her job, the News Leader’s Outdoors Reporter Sara Karnes omitted the margin between the old record and the new, and replaced it with the general hedge “breaks the previous record.” That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

Here’s Sara Karnes’ picture:

[image]

(Sara Karnes)

Can you see how Sara’s photograph is slightly off-center to the left, so that it is focused on her left eye? That’s because, to followers of the Left-hand path like Sara, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or the “eye of Horus”.

But don’t take my word for it:

‘The right eye is the Eye of Ra and the left is the Eye of Horus’.”

From “Freemasonry - Religion And Belief - The 3rd Temple”

Facebook: “Welcome to the Left-Hand-Path-Network, where Satanism is not about worship, but it’s study.”

Sara figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.

I have included her photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist Freemason in a position of marginal influence looks like.

They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.

But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.

Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.

From 1997 to 2022, the Missouri state record blue sucker increased in size by 17% , from 9 pounds, 14 ounces to 11 pounds, 5 ounces.

Wait, what? Such records are usually broken by tiny margins, as organisms grow in ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size. Right? What gives? Here, the record stood unbroken for over twenty years, and then was suddenly broken by an exponential, historically-unprecedented margin.

Spectacularly, this is, in journalistic parlance, “buried” in the eighth and very last paragraph of the article:

““Not only does Uebinger’s fish beat the current state record, it also weighs more than the current blue sucker world record of 2-pounds, 12-ounces,” MDC stated via news release.”

Wait, what? Two pounds? I thought it had to be a misprint, so I looked up a separate article, from Newsweek, by Aristos Georgiou, which reads: “The fish taken by Uebinger is also significantly heavier than the current International Game Fish Association (IGFA) all-tackle blue-sucker world record. Steven Wozniak caught that specimen, weighing just 2 pounds, 12 ounces, in April 2022 in the White River, Indiana.”

This will be interesting.

There are no media accounts of Steven Wozniak’s catch of the world record blue sucker in the White River in Indiana in April 2022.

Wikipedia - "The Blue Sucker is native to the United States and Mexico. In the U.S., it lives in the Mississippi River basin north to Minnesota and Wisconsin. The Blue Sucker also lives in the Missouri River drainage to North Dakota and South Dakota and Montana. This species can also be found in the Gulf drainage from the Sabine River to the Rio Grande.[1]

Habitat

Huge migrations of these fast, powerful fish once migrated throughout the Mississippi River basin, and spring harvests of blue sucker were a staple food for early pioneers. Blue suckers are very rare today, thought to be due to the segmentation of habitat caused by the thousands of dams which have been built in the last century. Blues frequent the thalweg of large river systems, in heavy current."

The Minnesota state record blue sucker weighed 14 pounds, 3 ounces, was 30 inches in length and 20.25 inches in girth. It was caught in the Mississippi river near Alma on February 28, 1987.

How could the IFGA world record blue sucker from 2022 weigh just two pounds, when the Minnesota state record blue sucker from 1987 weighed 14 pounds, 3 ounces?

And how can the current IGFA world record blue sucker from 2023 weigh 11 pounds, 5 ounces, when the Minnesota state record blue sucker from 1987 weighed 14 pounds, 3 ounces?

The Mississippi river rises in Minnesota, and then passes through Iowa, Illinois, Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, Mississippi and Alabama, before reaching the Gulf of Mexico. If the blue sucker is native to the United States, and lives in the Mississippi River north to Minnesota and Wisconsin, and the Mississippi river passes through Wisconsin, then why doesn’t Wisconsin have a state record for the blue sucker?

If the blue sucker is native to the United States, and lives in the Mississippi River north to Minnesota and Wisconsin, and the Mississippi river passes through Iowa, then why doesn’t Iowa have a state record for the blue sucker?

If the blue sucker is native to the United States, and lives in the Mississippi River north to Minnesota and Wisconsin, and the Mississippi river passes through Illinois, then why doesn’t Illinois have a state record for the blue sucker?

On November 22, 2009, the Kentucky state record blue sucker was caught by Stacy L. Boik in the Ohio River. It weighed 8.34 pounds.

If the blue sucker is native to the United States, and lives in the Mississippi River north to Minnesota and Wisconsin, and the Mississippi river passes through Tennessee, then why doesn’t Tennessee have a state record for the blue sucker?

If the blue sucker is native to the United States, and lives in the Mississippi River north to Minnesota and Wisconsin, and the Mississippi river passes through Arkansas, then why doesn’t Arkansas have a state record for the blue sucker?

If the blue sucker is native to the United States, and lives in the Mississippi River north to Minnesota and Wisconsin, and the Mississippi river passes through Alabama, then why doesn’t Iowa have a state record for the blue sucker?

If the blue sucker is native to the Missouri River, and the Missouri river rises in North Dakota and then passes through South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Iowa, and Missouri, then why doesn’t North Dakota have a state record for the blue sucker?

On April 28, 1988, Larry Peters caught the South Dakota state record blue sucker in the Missouri river at Fort Randall. It weighed 12 pounds, 7 ounces.

On November 18, 1986, Bob Thoene caught the Nebraska state record blue sucker in the Missouri river. It weighed 18 pounds, 14 ounces.

Jeff Miller, Libertyville, IL, February 9, 2022

If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]