“You have probably never heard of Professor Moriarty?” said he.
“Never.”
“Aye, there’s the genius and the wonder of the thing!” he cried. “The man pervades London, and no one has heard of him. That’s what puts him on a pinnacle in the records of crime. I tell you, Watson, in all seriousness, that if I could beat that man, if I could free society of him, I should feel that my own career had reached its summit, and I should be prepared to turn to some more placid line in life. Between ourselves, the recent cases in which I have been of assistance to the royal family of Scandinavia, and to the French republic, have left me in such a position that I could continue to live in the quiet fashion which is most congenial to me, and to concentrate my attention upon my chemical researches. But I could not rest, Watson, I could not sit quiet in my chair, if I thought that such a man as Professor Moriarty were walking the streets of London unchallenged.”
From “The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes - The Final Problem”, by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, 1894
The folks in charge are not your friends, and are lying to you about basically everything, including the purportedly-harmless non-ionizing radiation from what we euphemistically refer to as “wireless technology”.
I’ve edited most of the content below out of the work of Dr. Zorach Glaser.
The Moriarty quote up above is a reference to Professor Merril Eisenbud, former Director of the Laboratory of Environmental Studies at the New York University Medical Center’s Institute for Environmental Medicine, who said “we need several years of additional research, perhaps even a decade, before a new standard is set.” Two months later, he said that New York City setting a new, far lower standard for exposure to purportedly-harmless non-ionizing radiation was a “bad recommendation”.
Two months after that, he said “the scientific community should square off against the media. Scientists should attack the press.”
You’ll read more about him below.
During World War II, the U.S. military started to use radar, and the use of radio telecommunications systems was growing.
Soldiers working with these systems, which use radio and microwave frequencies — the same frequencies used for wireless devices such as cell phones and Wi-Fi — began to complain of adverse health effects from exposure to the radiation emitted by these systems. At the time, the illness experienced by these soldiers was referred to as “Radiation Sickness /Microwave Sickness.”
In 1962, a study in which mice were exposed to purportedly-harmless non-ionizing radiation resulted in Leukemia in 35% of those mice, vs. 10% of controls.
Put another way, leukemia in mice exposed to purportedly-harmless non-ionizing radiation increased by 250%, versus controls (35%, vs. 10%).
In the 1960’s, the U.S. Navy’s Medical Research Center’s Research Scientist Zorach Glaser spent about a decade collecting every study conducted within and outside the U.S. showing that the radiation emitted from radio frequencies (RFs) and microwave frequencies caused a host of adverse health effects.
Dr. Glaser’s 1971 report, “Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena (“Effects”) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radio-Frequency Radiation”, documented over 1000 different citations, each reporting various types of damage caused by purportedly-harmless non-ionizing radiation.
These include decreased testosterone leading to lowered testis size, histological changes in testicular epithelial structure, gross testicular histological changes, and decreased spermatogenesis.
Dr. Glaser’s work documents a total of 35 neurological/neuropsychiatric effects of non-thermal EMF exposures, including 9 central nervous system effects, 4 autonomic system effects, 17 psychological disorders, 4 behavioral changes and EEG changes.
It also reported 7 types of chromosomal aberrations several of which are known to be caused by chromosomal double stranded DNA breaks, 8 types of endocrine changes, and cell death (what we now call apoptosis).
Wi-Fi exposures produce impacts on the testes leading to lowered male fertility.
Wi-Fi exposure creates oxidative stress.
Wi-Fi exposure drives apoptosis (a process that has an important causal role in neurodegenerative disease).
Wi-Fi exposure causes DNA damage at the cellular level (a process causing cancer and germ line mutations).
Wi-Fi exposure leads to neuropsychiatric change, including EEG change, and 17 types of psychological disorders.
Wi-Fi exposure drives hormonal changes.
A few years ago, when Dr. Glaser realized the importance of his archives, he donated them to Dr. Magda Havas, Ph.D. of Trent University in Canada. Havas, an associate professor of environmental and resource studies, has worked for more than a decade to expose the harms of wireless technology.
According to Havas, Glaser’s archive contains quite a few “gems.” “Zory was a packrat (his words) and he kept everything, Havas said. “I found one paper that was circulated to only nine people with health recommendations that were ignored.”
To make these important documents available to the public, Havas and her team have worked for years to scan all the documents and make them searchable. So far Havas’ team has scanned 20 out of the 25 boxes of Glaser’s archives.
Because of the archive’s magnitude, the public is invited to help review the documents. Scholars who are interested are invited to write short overviews of some of the more useful and relevant finds and post those overviews on Zory’s website. People who find important information are asked to let Havas know.
If you are interested in participating in this project, please contact Dr. Magda Havas ([email protected]) with a subject heading of “Zory’s Archive.”
In the 1970’s, squirrel monkeys in their second and third trimesters of pregnancy were exposed to levels of purportedly-harmless non-ionizing radiation equivalent to the national standard at the time. Then their offspring were irradiated for six months after birth.
Four out of five died, versus zero in the control group. The Air Force rejected the data based upon the small study size.
in 1973, the President’s Office of Telecommunication Policy (OTP) and its Electromagnetic Radiation Management Advisory Council (ERMAC) had failed to establish a coordinated research program on the biological effects of chronic exposure to low levels of microwave and radiofrequency radiation.
In March 1973, the President’s Office of Telecommunications Policy was quietly abolished, and most of its functions, including its sup- posed coordination of all federally-sponsored research into the biological effects of microwaves were transferred to the new National Telecommunications and Information Administration.
In May 1977, a technical review of the biological effects of microwave radiation was issued by an ad hoc working group for the President’s Office of Science and Technology. It found “a distressing lack of data” on the possible subtle, long-term, and cumulative effects of low-level radiation. Moreover, they made the astonishing observation that “Subtle central nervous system (CNS) effects, even if reversible, might disrupt or affect the judgment of individuals performing critical tasks (airplane pilots, drivers of automobiles, etc.).”
In August 1977, the New York City Department of Health proposed to establish a standard for environmental exposure to radiofrequency and microwave radiation 200 times below the national standard.
Professor Merril Eisenbud, Director of the Laboratory of Environmental Studies at the New York University Medical Center’s Institute for Environmental Medicine, said “we need several years of additional research, perhaps even a decade, before a new standard is set.” Two months later, he said that New York City setting a new, far-lower standard was a “bad recommendation”.
In November 1977, a study was issued by the General Accounting Office (the chief investigating arm of Congress), plainly stating “More Protection from Microwave Radiation Hazards Needed.” In more than half of the 112 scientific investigations that were reviewed, animals and humans exposed to microwave radiation levels at or below the present national standard “experienced biological effects, some undesirable.”
In December 1977, Professor Merril Eisenbud said “the scientific community should square off against the media. Scientists should attack the press.”
[image]
(Professor Merril Eisenbud, former Director of the Laboratory of Environmental Studies at the New York University Medical Center’s Institute for Environmental Medicine, who said “we need several years of addition research, perhaps even a decade, before a new standard is set.” Two months later, he said that setting a new standard for exposure to purportedly-harmless non-ionizing radiation was a “bad recommendation”.)
I’ve included Professor Merril Eisenbud’s photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of significant influence looks like.
He and his fellow conspirators are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth.
It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
In 1978, the Senate Commerce Committee (chaired by Senator Howard W. Cannon, of Nevada) not only failed to hold additional oversight hearings, but issued a “Report on Radiation Health and Safety” reflecting and accepting the biased and unwarranted conclusions of the military-industrial complex and suppressing scientific evidence concerning the existence of serious health hazards.
Ignoring the findings of its former principal staff member, the Committee members accepted an utterly unfounded assurance that low levels of microwave and radiofrequency radiation pose no threat to the general population.
Here’s former Senator Howard Cannon’s picture:
[image]
(Former Senator Howard Cannon, who said that low levels of microwave and radiofrequency radiation pose no threat to the general population.)
I’ve included his photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of significant influence looks like.
He and his fellow conspirators are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth.
It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
In July 2018, the journal Environmental Research published “Wi-Fi is an important threat to human health”.
Where author Martin L. Pall used the bizarre positive spin of “important threat”, versus the plainspoken “great threat”, or simply “Wi-Fi is a threat to human health”.
The article goes on to say “This paper is not focused on anecdotal reports but rather on 23 controlled, scientific studies of such health-related effects in animals, cells including human cells in culture and in human beings (Table 1).”
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why a cancer.com article from August 2021 said "The ACS says on its website that it “does not have any official position or statement on whether or not radiofrequency radiation from cell phones, cell phones towers, or other sources is a cause of cancer.”
That’s because cell phones and cell phones cause cancer, and the first rule of Politics is “deny, deny, deny”.
Jeff Miller, Libertyville, IL, August 23, 2022
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
