“I’m not interested in preserving the status quo. I want to overthrow it.”
Niccolò Machiavelli, 1531
I’ve made a lot of progress on my “Billfish” article.
I’m appending the data from “Tuna” here. At the moment, it combines bluefin tuna and yellowfin tuna.
A current copy of “Billfish” is attached here for the 38 members of my free mailing list.
Tomorrow, I’m going to combine “Bluefin Tuna” and “Swordfish”, and see what we see.
Then I’ll focus on a third species of large fish, work on its data, and then combine all three species, and see what we see.
Perhaps catfish.
TUNA
From “Positive Changes That Are Occurring”, by Jeff Miller, Libertyville, Illinois, November 15, 2022
Great positive changes are underway at every level of our reality. They began in earnest in 2012, and have been increasing in speed and magnitude. I began writing this series of articles, entitled “Positive Changes That Are Occurring”, in July of 2013.
These historically-unprecedented positive changes are being driven by many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices based on the work of Wilhelm Reich and Karl Hans Welz.
Since Don Croft first fabricated tactical Orgonite in 2000, its widespread, ongoing and ever-increasing distribution has been unknitting and transforming the ancient Death energy matrix built and expanded by our dark masters, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. And, as a result, the Ether is returning to its natural state of health and vitality.
One of those changes is that fish are growing to sizes never seen previously at rates that have increased exponentially, going forward in time, as well as fish numbers increasing to levels that have also never been seen previously. And, despite ceaseless, hysterical propaganda to the contrary, that includes tuna.
TUNA - THE DATA
In 1979, the world all-tackle record bluefin tuna was caught off Nova Scotia. It weighed 1,496 pounds.
From 1982 to 2015, the California State spearfishing state record tuna increased in size by 76.8%, or close to doubled in size. That’s an average annual increase in size of 2.3% per year over each of those 33 years.
From 1984 to 2001, the yellowfin tuna decreased in size by 14%, from 239 pounds (Catalina Island, California) to 205.8 pounds (Mississippi). It’s possible that it disappeared from Southern California in 1984 and reappeared in the Gulf of Mexico at a smaller size 17 years later, in 2001.
From 1984 to 2017, the yellowfin tuna increased in size by 11%, from 239 pounds (Catalina Island, California) to 265 pounds (Catalina Island, California). That’s an average annual increase in size of .33% per year over each of those 33 years.
From 1984 to 2017, the yellowfin tuna is absent from the record in California for 33 years. Either it was there all along, albeit at a size smaller than 239 pounds, or it was absent entirely, wiped out of existence there by the decrease in health of the etheric environment in Southern California.
From 1995 to 2017, the largest bluefin tuna ever caught in North Carolina increased in size by 40%. That’s an annual rate of increase of 1.7% during those 23 years.
From 1995 to 2011, the North Carolina state record bluefin tuna increased in size by 8%. That’s an average annual increase in size of .5% per year over each of those eleven years.
From 1996 to 2006, the South Carolina state record Bluefin tuna increased in size by 19.4%, from 332-pounds, 6-ounces to 396 pounds. That’s an average annual increase in size of 1.94% over those ten years.
From 1996 to 2006, the bluefin tuna is absent from the record in South Carolina. It disappeared at a weight of 332 pounds, 6 ounces, and reappeared ten years later 19.4% larger at a weight of 396 pounds.
In 2001, the Mississippi state record yellowfin tuna weighed 205.8 pounds.
From 2001 to 2020, the yellowfin tuna is absent from the record in Mississippi. Either the yellowfin tuna was there in the Gulf of Mexico all along from 2001 to 2020, albeit at a weight of less than 205.8 pounds, or the yellowfin tuna winked out of existence in the Gulf of Mexico sometime soon after 2001, last seen at a weight of 205.8 pounds. Then, after an absence of 19 years, it reappeared in the Gulf in 2020 at a 15%-heavier 236.6 pounds.
At a minimum, we know certainly that, from 2001 to 2020, the Mississippi state record yellowfin Tuna increased in size by 15%, from 205.8 pounds to 236.6 pounds.
From 2001 to 2020, the yellowfin tuna in Mississippi increased in size by an average of .8% per year.
From 2001 to 2010, the yellowfin tuna increased in size by 97%, or doubled in size, from 205.8 pounds (Mississippi) to 405 pounds (Mexico).
From 2001 to 2010, the yellowfin tuna increased in size by an average of 1%.
From 2002 to 2010, the yellowfin tuna is absent from the record - it’s not in Mississippi, it’s not anywhere. It has either continued to be caught throughout its range at sizes smaller than 205.8 pounds, or the yellow tuna was wiped out of existence in the Gulf of Mexico by the technology-driven degradation of the health of the etheric environment there.
Prior to 2003, the bluefin tuna is absent from the record in Virginia.
In 2003, the Virginia state record bluefin tuna increased in size by 11.6%, from 357 pounds to 393 pounds.
From June 6, 2003 to November 5, 2003, the Virginia state record bluefin tuna increased in size by 10%, from 357 pounds to 393 pounds.
From November 5, 2003 to November 11, 2003, the Virginia state record bluefin tuna increased in size by 1.4%, from 393 pounds to 398 pounds, 5 ounces.
From 2003 to 2007 the Virginia state record bluefin tuna increased in size by 44%, from 398 pounds, 8 ounces to 573 pounds.
From 2003 to 2007, the average annual increase in size of the Virginia state record bluefin tuna was 11%.
From 2005 to 2018, the volume of bigeye tuna production in the Philippines increased by 89%, or almost doubled.
From June 2007 to 2015, the Virginia state record bluefin tuna increased in size by 5.8%, from 573 pounds to 606 pounds.
From 2007 to 2015, the average annual increase in size of the Virginia state record bluefin tuna was 5.8%.
In 2010, the IGFA world record yellowfin tuna in Mexico weighed 445 pounds.
In 2010, after a nine year absence from this plane of existence, the yellowfin tuna suddenly reappeared in Mexico, at a weight of 445 pounds - twice as large as the 205.8 pounds at which it had previously manifested in the Gulf of Mexico off Mississippi.
From 2006 to 2010, tuna increased in size by 2.3%, from 396 pounds (Bluefin, South Carolina) to 405 pounds (yellowfin, Mexico). That’s an average annual increase in size of 1.15% per year over each of those two years.
From 2010 to 2012, the 4.9% average annual increase in size of the yellowfin tuna was 390% greater, or almost five times larger than its 1% average annual increase in size from 2001 to 2010.
From 2010 to 2012, the 390% increase in the size of the yellowfin tuna was 358% greater, or four times greater than its 85% increase from 1984 to 2010.
From 2010 to 2012, the yellowfin tuna increased in size by 9.8%, from 405 pounds (IGFA world record, Mexico) to 445 pounds (stripped IGFA world record, California). Louisiana Sportsman’s Jerry Dilsaver omitted the percentage, and replaced it with “surpassed the existing world record by a full 40 pounds”.
From 2010 to 2012, the yellowfin tuna increased in size by 10% and expanded its range from Mexico up to Southern California.
From 2010 to 2012, the average annual increase in size of the yellowfin tuna was 4.9%.
The 4.9% average annual increase in size of the yellowfin tuna from 2010 to 2012 is 85% greater than its .33% average from 1984 to 2010.
In 2010, the growth rate of the yellowfin began to increase hyper-exponentially, going forward in time. That’s not scientifically possible, at least not according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms increase in ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size, and that “there is no such thing as the ether.”
The truth is that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.
From 2011 to 2017, the 4.9% average annual increase in size of the largest swordfish ever caught in North Carolina was 880% greater than the .5% average annual increase in size of the North Carolina state record bluefin tuna from 1995 to 2011.
From 2011 to 2017, the North Carolina state record bluefin tuna increased in size by 9%, for an annual rate of increase of 1.5% per year over each of those 6 years.
The 1.5% average annual increase in size of the North Carolina state record bluefin tuna from 2011 to 2017 was 200% greater, or three times that of its .5% average annual increase in size from 1995 to 2011.
In 2011, the growth rate of the North Carolina state record bluefin tuna began increasing hyper-exponentially, going forward in time. That’s not scientifically possible, at least not according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms increase in ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size, and that “there is no such thing as the ether.”
The truth is that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.
The From 2012 to 2016, the average annual increase in size of the world record yellowfin tuna was 1.35%.
The 1.35% average annual increase in size of the world record yellowfin tuna from 2012 to 2016 was 1,250% greater than its .1% increase documented from 1977 to 2012.
In 2012, the growth rate of the world record yellowfin tuna began increasing hyper-exponentially, going forward in time. That’s not scientifically possible, at least not according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms increase in ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size, and that “there is no such thing as the ether.”
The truth is that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.
From 2012 to 2019, the Washington state record bluefin tuna increased in size by 152% percent, or almost tripled in size, in just seven years. That’s an average annual increase in size of 26% per year over each of those seven years.
In 2012, the growth rate of the Washington state record bluefin tuna almost tripled, going forward in time.
That’s not scientifically possible, at least not according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms increase in ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size, and that “there is no such thing as the ether.”
The truth is that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.
Here’s a picture of the record holder from 2019:
[image]
(The current Washington state record bluefin tuna, from 2019 - well more than double the size of the previous record holder from 2012)
In 2011 and 2012, the growth rate of the world record bluefin tuna, the North Carolina state record bluefin tuna and the Washington state record bluefin tuna all began increasing hyper-exponentially almost simultaneously.
From 2011 to 2018, the North Carolina state record bluefin tuna increased in size by 8.9%, from 805 pounds to 877 pounds.
From 2011 to 2018, the average annual increase in size of the North Carolina state record bluefin tuna was 1.3%.
From 2011 to 2017, the average annual increase in size of the Bluefin tuna off North Carolina peaked at 4.9%.
From 2012 to 2016, the 1.3% and 1.5% average annual increases in size of the world record yellowfin tuna and the North Carolina state record bluefin tuna were statistically almost identical.
From 2012 to 2014, the average annual increase in size of the Washington’s State record bluefin tuna was 3.7%.
From 2015 to 2018, the 8.9% average annual increase in size of the bluefin tuna was 140% greater, or well more than double the 3.7% average documented from 2012 to 2014 (Washington vs. North Carolina).
That’s not scientifically possible, at least not according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms increase in ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size, and that “there is no such thing as the ether.”
The truth is that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.
From 2013 to 2019, Papua New Guinea’s tuna exports more than tripled.
In January 2014, the first tuna sold at the Tsukiji fish market in Japan sold for $70,000.
In January 2014, directly in the face of a $70,000 tuna, the Atlantic widened its eyes to simulate honesty and explained “Sushinomics: How Bluefin Tuna Became a Million-Dollar Fish”.
In 2015, the first tuna sold at the Tsukiji fish market in Japan sold for $37,000.
Fom 2014 to 2015, the price of the first tuna sold at the Tsukiji fish auction in Japan decreased by 47%, from $70,000 to $37,000.
In 2014, the United Nations Food & Agriculture organization said that tuna prices decreased “considerably”, and “significantly”, due to “excess supply”, with frozen skipjack tuna prices decreasing to a 6-year low.
In June 2015, NPR wrung its hands and wailed “Why Is This Fisherman Selling Threatened Bluefin Tuna For $2.99 A Pound***?***”
In 2015, the Virginia state record bluefin tuna weighed 606 pounds.
From 2015 to 2020, the Virginia state record bluefin tuna increased in size by 17%, from 606 pounds to 708 pounds.
From 2015 to 2020, the average annual increase in size of the bluefin tuna in Virginia was 3.4%.
In 2015, the Washington state record bluefin tuna weighed (add to tuna data)
From 2015 to 2018, the 8.9% average annual increase in size of the bluefin tuna was 140% greater, or well more than double the 3.7% average documented from 2012 to 2014 (Washington vs. North Carolina).
That’s not scientifically possible, at least not according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms increase in ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size, and that “there is no such thing as the ether.”
The truth is that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.
From 2016 to September 2021, the California state record bluefin tuna increased in size by 34%, from 245 pounds to 395.4 pounds.
From 2016 to 2021, the California state record bluefin tuna increased in size by an annual average of 8.5%.
From 2016 to 2017, Vietnam’s seafood volume increased by 5.3%.
In October 2016, a seafoodlegacy.com article said “$1.8M Tuna to “Affordable” $1 Tuna Sushi—The Mystery of Japanese Tuna Industry”.
In 2016, the California state record bluefin tuna weighed 245 pounds
In the 1st Quarter of 2017, the Solomon Islands recorded a $57.5m trade surplus…“the increase mainly attributed to $52.1m of fish loin exports to Italy.”
To understand the deception, we must understand that more than 90% of the Solomon Islands marine product exports have usually comprised tuna and tuna-related products. Which demonstrates that the author substituted the bizarre, general “fish loins” to obscure the great increase in the tuna population in and around the Solomon Islands.
From 2017 to 2018, the Yellowfin tuna fish catch in Oman increased by 47%.
In 2017, the largest Bluefin tuna ever caught off North Carolina weighed 1,045 pounds. It was ruled ineligible for the state record because it was sold commercially. (Add to tuna data)
The growth rate of Bluefin tuna caught off North Carolina increased exponentially, going forward in time. That’s not supposed to be scientifically possible.
The average annual increase in size of the Bluefin tuna off North Carolina peaked at 4.9% per year from 2011 to 2017.
In the 1st Quarter of 2017, the Solomon Islands recorded a $57.5m trade surplus…“the increase mainly attributed to $52.1m of fish loin exports to Italy.”
To understand the deception, we must understand that more than 90% of the Solomon Islands marine product exports have usually comprised tuna and tuna-related products. Which demonstrates that the author substituted the bizarre, general “fish loins” to obscure the great increase in the tuna population in and around the Solomon Islands. That’s an example of the propaganda technique know as “compartmentalization”. As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda.
In May 2017, the Washington Post said “Here’s the funny thing about canned tuna: Even as Americans lost their taste for the fish and demand dropped steadily for years, the price of a can seemed to hold steady or rise. For some, it was an economic riddle.”
The Washington Post is using conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty to assert that prices increase when demand decreases. They’re covering up for an establishment that is engaged in what is known as “price fixing”.
For those late to the party, Capitalism as it has been described to us does not, in fact exist.
In September 2017, a Daily Mail article from Australia said “Record numbers of huge bluefin tuna fish caught in Sydney” and that “Amateur anglers are cashing in on record numbers of enormous bluefin Tuna migrating across the east coast of Australia.”
That author of the article doesn’t offer any suggestion as to what has caused there to be more tuna than there ever were in history in Australia, and there’s no mention of the fact that tuna numbers are increasing regardless of geography. Nor is there a mention as to why they are, well, enormous. Those are all examples of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The Daily Mail is a State propaganda organ, doing what it can to support the international news blackout that is in place on this subject. They’re desperate to keep you from realizing that the health, size and longevity of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.
In the first three Quarters of 2017, Korean seafood exports increased by 11%, “on strong demand for dried laver and tuna, the maritime ministry said Sunday.”
Where we once again see the tirelessly-deployed “increased demand” ruse, vs. the truth, “they sold all they caught.” Did you notice how they put tuna to the last? There was clearly some huge positive change in the marine environment in Korea in 2017.
In November 2017, NPR asked “Is It Time To Catch The Wave Of Rebounding Atlantic Bluefin Tuna***?***
The article goes on to say “Fishermen up and down the New England Coast” said it had been “decades” since they’d been able to catch “so many” Atlantic bluefin tuna “so fast”. The author said that, once severely depleted, populations of the prized sushi fish “appear to be rebounding”. Walter Golet, a jointly appointed researcher at the Gulf of Maine Research Institute and University of Maine, said that the increase had been ‘incredible, just incredible’.
Clay Porch, a federal scientist who leads bluefin stock assessments for the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas, or ICCAT, said “It’s really difficult to say clearly what environmental changes could have led to this current increase in abundance”.
In 2018, skipjack tuna prices dropped to a two-year low in Bangkok, Thailand.
In August 2018, an article () said that there were “far more” tuna at fishing tournament in Maine, and that the tournament’s quota increase “reflects a tuna resurgence seen on the water for some time.”
In January 2017, an article () said “North Atlantic Cooling Has Plunged Below 1950s (And 1800s) Levels”.
Well, if that’s true, then why does an In December 2017, the U.K.’s Independent from December 2017, headlined “Huge blue fin tuna weighing 350 pounds caught off Devon coast” go on to say “With ‘more’ bluefin tuna being spotted in British waters ‘due to climate change heating the ocean and changing the path of currents’, researchers expect more to be ‘accidentally’ caught in the future.”
It is true. The U.K.’s Independent is using conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.
I have exposed their duplicity by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”. The author said “”more bluefin tuna being spotted” to reinforce the false meme that the gigantic fish had been there all along, only no one had looked for them with the proper assiduousness, previously.
If you recall, in the previous example, the federal scientist leading Atlantic Bluefin tuna stock assessments said that it was “really difficult to say clearly” what led to the increase in bluefin tuna abundance in the Atlantic. Why do marine scientists in the U.K. have clarity that it is “climate change heating the ocean and changing the path of currents” which is leading to the “accidental” catch of far more tuna, and yet the fish Feds in the U.S. are without a clue as to the cause?
It’s because they’re all lying as hard and as fast as they can about the tuna.
In December 2017, the Vietnam News Agency said that Vietnam’s “Seafood “ exports were “up”.
In March 2018, an article from Australia’s Adelaide Now said “Easter fish: Adelaide fishmongers see drop in alternative fish prices”.
You have to read the article to learn that they’re talking about “Atlantic salmon, kingfish, king salmon, blue fin and yellow fin tuna.”
An article from August 2018 said that there were “far more” tuna at fishing tournament in Maine, and that the tournament’s quota increase “reflects a tuna resurgence seen on the water for some time.”
In July 2018, described a “Dramatic fall in North Atlantic heat content”. The article goes on to say “surface and subsurface temperatures of the North Atlantic have fallen to their lowest levels in in more than 30 years.”
In August 2018, an AP News article described “A controversial comeback for a highly prized tuna”.
Shana Miller, The Ocean Foundation’s program manager for global tuna conservation, said a quota increase of hundreds of thousands of pounds was “a bad idea” because of “a possible return to overfishing, and because of concerns that increasingly warming oceans could retard the fish’s reproduction”.
Shana Miller, the Ocean Foundation’s program manager for global tuna conservation, is using conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty. She’s lying bald-facedly about the temperature of the Atlantic Ocean in which bluefin tuna are booming and burgeoning to levels never seen previously. I have exposed her duplicity through what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
The New York times bravely did what they could to hedge by describing a steep and sudden cooling of the North Atlantic with the Mil-speak “fall in heat content”. They said “in more than 30 years” so they could avoid saying “water temperatures in the North Atlantic have decreased to their lowest level in history”.
Here’s Shana’s picture, in a nifty Satanic purple and green dress:
[image]
(Shana Miller, the Ocean Foundation’s program manager for global tuna conservation, in a nifty Satanic purple and green dress.)
I’ve included her photograph so you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like. Did you notice that she’s wearing a natty Satanic green and purple dress?
In January 2019, NPR wrung its hands and said “Threatened Bluefin Tuna Sells For $3 Million In Tokyo Market”.
In January 2019, Business Insider asked “Why is bluefin tuna so expensive and why is canned tuna so cheap***?***”
With the answer being “a picked generational Satanist shill in Japan stepped up and paid $3M for the tuna (or pretended to), as they were under strict orders to do so, as a ruse, to prop up the failing and wholly-fraudulent “Poor Mother Gaia is Dying” confidence game”.
In August 2019, the Vineyard Gazette widened its eyes to simulate honesty, wrung its hands and said “Once Robust, Bluefin Tuna Fishery Is In Economic Freefall”.
It’s a Black magic spell. It is true that, in 2018, the Atlantic bluefin tuna fishery was in the luridily-but-only-generally described “economic freefall” described by the Vineyard Gazette. However, what they don’t mention is that “once robust” refers to the bottom line of the business operation, when it’s falsely alluded to refer to bluefin tuna numbers in the Atlantic. Which were booming and burgeoning to a point where it collapsed the price of the fish to nothing.
That’s why, just three months later, in January 2020, seafoodsource.com said “Bluefin tuna prices low heading into 2020”. Prices decrease either when supply increases, demand decreases, or both.
Well, if that’s true, why does a Mashed article from February 2020 ask “Why is bluefin tuna so expensive***?***”?
Mashed is using conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty. They’re alluding to the new Japanese tradition of the annual ruse-fish.
The month before, in January 2020, bloomberg.com said “Bluefin Tuna Fetches $1.79 Million in Tokyo’s New Year Auction, 2nd Highest Ever”.
The tirelessly-repeated “why is bluefin tuna so expensive” meme is a social engineering tactic that has, to this point, been highly effective. It’s a reference to the annual ruse-fish that a generational Satanist insider in Japan pays way, way way more than they should for. It’s a con, a confidence game, to prop up the illusion that bluefin tuna are rare, and in dwindling supply.
When the truth is that bluefin tuna are booming and burgeoning to a level never seen previously. Along with all the other tuna. That’s why an Undercurrent News article from January of 2020 is headlined “Tuna sector eyes recovery from record low prices.”
Prices decrease either when supply increases, demand decreases, or both.
“Record” low prices means the lowest tuna prices, ever, in all recorded history.
In 2020, the Mississippi state record yellowfin Tuna weighed 236.6 pounds. It was caught by Mike McElroy III.
Here’s a picture of the 2020 record holder:
[image]
(Mike McElroy III, with his new Mississippi state record yellowfin tuna, from 2020. It weighed 236.6 pounds, and was 15% larger than the previous 205.8 pound record holder from 2001. The record stood for almost twenty years, and then was suddenly broken by an exponential margin.)
The record stood for almost twenty years, and then was suddenly broken by an exponential margin. Such records are usually broken by tiny margins, as the organism will necessarily grow at a slower and slower rate as it approaches its maximum possible size.
In 2020, the Virginia state record bluefin tuna weighed 508 pounds. It was caught by Jake Hills. Here’s a picture of it:
[image]
(Jake Hiles, with his new Virginia state record bluefin tuna, from 2020. It weighed 708-pounds, and was 17% larger than the previous 606 pound record holder from 2015.)
Such records are usually broken by tiny margins, as the organism will necessarily grow at a slower and slower rate as it approaches its maximum possible size.
Jeff Miller, Libertyville, IL, November 14, 2022
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
