In 2011, Psychology Today’s Emily Deans, M.D. published “Wheat and Serious Mental Illness”, to conceal the fact that the actual driver was the small, neuroactive peptides from cow’s milk, with wheat serving merely as an accomplice

“It is of the essence of any party to gain its orientation not from truths but from illusions which usually correspond to the irrational mass structure. Scientific truths only interfered with the habit of the party politicians of avoiding difficulties with the aid of illusions.”

From “The Mass Psychology of Fascism”, by Wilhelm Reich, 1933

THE DATA

Milk consumption drives psychopathology and schizophrenia when its small neuroactive peptides permeate the leaky guts of people who eat too much wheat and go on to move through the bloodstream and across the blood-brain barrier.

The purportedly-harmless low-wavelength microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as “wireless technology” speeds the process by causing the blood-brain barrier to leak.

Bipolar disorder is 1,600% greater among those with Coeliac disease than it is among the general populace.

In 2018, depression in healthy controls with no sensitivity to gluten who ate wheat increased by between 15% and 58%. Nutrients’ first-author Eleanor Busby said it was because of “social exclusion”.

In 2018, depression in both Coeliac patients and healthy controls who did not eat wheat decreased by 37%.

The huge decrease was the same whether those who stopped eating wheat had coeliac disease, or no.

In the very first line of her study in the journal “Nutrients”, first-author Eleanor Busby said “Gluten elimination may represent an effective treatment strategy for mood disorders in individuals with gluten-related disorders. However, the directionality of the relationship remains unclear.”

Where she’s erased the identical benefit that giving up wheat provides for those without gluten-related disorders, and implied that eating wheat might also make you saner.

THE ARTICLES

On August 16, 2011, Psychology Today published “Wheat and Serious Mental Illness”.

Where, despite being a scientist by trade, author Emily Deans, M.D. wrote the headline in a way where the reader cannot discern that the article is, in fact, about wheat as a driver of serious mental illness. To make the ruse even more spectacular, the actual culprit is cow’s milk, which goes completely unmentioned; wheat is only an accomplice, as you’ll see.

As a propagandist, Emily knows that seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and her hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the scope of the exponential increase in milk- and wheat-driven mental illness that she is attempting to obfuscate.

The article goes on to say “here is an excerpt of the discussion from paper 10 (another one from Faith Dickerson’s group, as a matter of fact): ‘We can speculate that a subset of individuals with recent onset psychosis and/or schizophrenia may have cellular junction pathology that allows peptide fragments generated from the digestion of bovine milk to permeate the intestinal tract, and enter the bloodstream… Dohan… hypothesized that the aberrent proteolysis of milk and grain products may produce small neuroactive peptides that can enter into the circulation and ultimately cross the blood-brain barrier’.”

Can you see how Emily deviously omitted the name of the author, the title of the study, and its date of publication? Then, spectacularly, she clucked “as a matter of fact” to make the rubes in the Punch and Judy tent think that she was being studious, and to distract them from the sleight-of-hand.

Every successful Confidence game depends upon misdirection, you see.

Emily and the rest of her rotten ilk proudly refer to this sort of chicanery as “tradecraft”.

Now lets read a version written by an honest person:

Milk consumption drives psychopathology and schizophrenia when its small neuroactive pepties permeate the leaky guts of people who eat too much wheat and go on to move through the bloodstream and across the blood-brain barrier.

[image]

(Heidi Klum in a “got milk” advertisement, with Satanic purple background)

Can you see how the photograph is centered on Heidi’s left eye? That’s because, to followers of the Left-hand path like Heidi, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or the “eye of Horus”.

But don’t take my word for it:

‘The right eye is the Eye of Ra and the left is the Eye of Horus’.”

From “Freemasonry - Religion And Belief - The 3rd Temple”

Facebook: “Welcome to the Left-Hand-Path-Network, where Satanism is not about worship, but it’s study.”

Heidi figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.

Now here’s Psychology Today author Emily Deans’ picture, sitting in a Satanic purple chair:

[image]

(Emily Deans, MD)

Can you see how Emily’s photograph is centered on her left eye? That’s because, to followers of the Left-hand path like Emily, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or the “eye of Horus”.

Emily figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.

I have included Heidi and Emily’s photographs so that you could get a better idea of what generational Satanist Freemasons of varying influence and attractiveness look like.

They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.

But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.

Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.

On November 8, 2018, the Journal “Nutrients” published “Mood Disorders and Gluten: It’s Not All in Your Mind ! A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis”.

Where first author Eleanor Busby said “Mood Disorders and Gluten” because, as a propagandist, she knows that seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and his hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the exponential degree by which cow’s milk and wheat make you insane.

As a bonus, she carefully omitted “wheat” and “mental illness”, and replaced them with the softer, gentler “gluten and mood disorders”. It’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “spin”.

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to write about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “unclear”.

That’s why the first line of the study reads “Gluten elimination may represent an effective treatment strategy for mood disorders in individuals with gluten-related disorders. However, the directionality of the relationship remains unclear.”

In that bizarre, twisted statement, Eleanor Busby used the Mil-speak “directionality of the relationship remains unclear” to imply that, in addition to making you crazier, eating wheat might also make you saner.

The purported scientist soldiers on:

“A gluten-free diet (GFD) significantly improved pooled depressive symptom scores in GFD-treated patients (Standardised Mean Difference (SMD) −0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.55 to −0.20; p < 0.0001), with no difference in mean scores between patients and healthy controls after one year (SMD 0.01, 95% CI −0.18 to 0.20, p = 0.94).”

Where “improved pooled depressive symptom scores” is Mil-speak for “eating wheat drives mental illness”.

It’s a fantastic bit of Black magic. Let’s break it down:

In 2018, a gluten free diet decreased depression by 37% in both Coeliac patients and healthy controls. The huge decrease was the same whether those who stopped eating wheat had coeliac disease, or no.

Eleanor deviously used the word “patients” twice, to refer to two distinct groups: A - “patients” who did not eat any wheat, and, B - Coeliac disease patients. She’s done her best to muddy the water, but, unfortunately for Eleanor, I’m on the case.

Even more spectacularly, she follows immediately with “There was a tendency towards worsening symptoms for non-coeliac gluten sensitive patients during a blinded gluten challenge vs. placebo (SMD 0.21, 95% CI −0.58 to 0.15; p = 0.25).”

It’s a completely new line of discourse, however she is disengenuously connecting it with the previous sentence, to confuse the reader.

disingenuous - adjective - not candid or sincere, typically by pretending that one knows less about something than one really does

And, then, fantastically, she said “non-coeliac gluten-sensitive patients”, which is an oxymoron.

Coeliac patients are gluten sensitive. People who are not afflicted with Coeliac disease are not gluten sensitive.

oxymoron - noun - a self-contradicting word or group of words (as in Shakespeare’s line from Romeo and Juliet, “Why, then, O brawling love! O loving hate!”).

I’ll write it a different way to clarify:

In 2018, depression in healthy controls with no sensitivity to gluten who ate wheat increased by between 15% and 58%. Nutrients first-author Eleanor Busby said it was because of “social exclusion”.

Here’s Eleanor Busby’s picture, with a Satanic green and purple background:

[image]

(Eleanor Busby, who said that a 15% to 58% increase in depression among healthy controls with no sensitivity to gluten who ate wheat was caused by “social exclusion”.

Can you see how Eleanor’s photograph is centered on her left eye? That’s because, to followers of the Left-hand path like Eleanor, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or the “eye of Horus”.

Eleanor figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.

I have included her photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist Freemason in a position of marginal influence looks like.

They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.

But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.

Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.

On August 10, 2020, directly in the face of evidence proving that wheat causes mental illness, the Temecula Center for Integrative Medicine questioned “Can Gluten Cause Mental Health Disorders?

Where author Jonathan Villenga, MD carefully omitted “wheat” and “mental illness”, replacing them with the softer, gentler “mental health disorders” and “gluten”. It’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

In journalistic parlance, this is "buried’ seven paragraphs down:

“Mood disorders, such as bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorders including panic disorder are strongly associated with Celiac Disease, with bipolar disorder being 17 times more likely to affect those with Celiac Disease than the general population (13).”

Bipolar disorder is 1,600% greater among those with Coeliac disease than it is among the general populace.

For grade school children studying the subject in the future, asking the average American in 2020 to read seven paragraphs is like asking someone from 1950 to read “War and Peace” at a sitting.

Jeff Miller, Libertyville, IL, February 8, 2022

If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]