“The more data you compile the clearer this will become and I think it’s worth pursuing but just broaching the subject is a pioneering effort.”
Don Croft in an e-mail to Jeff Miller, on technology driven suicide, 2017
I’ve been steadily compiling all of my articles on this subject into one, and it is far larger than can be published on the UK Orgones forum. I’m also researching every study I can on the subject, one by one, and integrating the data from them into my Master study.
My mailing list members will get an electronic copy of the Master article momentarily, which I’ll continue to revise and resend.
The data below is from just two studies, one in 2019 and one in 2022. As you’ll see, the game is already over for these people.
Now, how long it will take for the truth to reach wider awareness is a whole other question.
But we can’t unlearn things, we cannot “unsee” things.
And when Con’s collapse, they do so in a rush, like a house of cards.
Thanks to all of you for being here.
From 2000 to 2014, the 223.8% increase in women and girls in England reporting Non-Suicidal Self Harm to relieve unpleasant feelings of anger, tension, anxiety, or depression was 20.5% greater, or one fifth greater than its 185.7% increase among men and boys.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, and said, only-generally that prevalence was “significantly higher in women and girls”.
Where the hedging generality “significantly higher” and the omission of the statistic obscure the fact that Non-Suicidal Self Harm is exponentially greater among females than it is among males.
1st Author Elisa Mancinelli of the University of Padua’s January 2022 study in Comprehensive Psychiatry omitted the statistic, and said in comment “No gender differences have emerged.”
Where the bald-faced lie “no gender difference have emerged” and the omission of the statistic obscure the fact that Non-Suicidal Self Harm is exponentially greater among females than it is among males.
I have exposed the duplicity of Sally McManus, Elisa Mancinelli, the City University of London, the University of Padua, and the esteemed Scientific journals Lancet Psychiatry and Comprehensive Psychiatry by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking.
From 2000 to 2014, the 203% increase in the prevalence of self-reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm among women and girls aged 16-24 years in England was 21.8% greater than its 166.6% increase among the general populace.
1st Author Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, and described it only-generally as “Increases in prevalence were noted in both sexes and across age groups—most notably in women and girls aged 16–24 years”.
Where the hedging generalities “increases in prevalence” and “most notably” and the omission of the statistic all obscure the fact that Non-Suicidal Self Harm is increasing at the greatest rate among females who were exposed to technology at the earliest age.
In January 2022, 1st Author Elisa Mancinelli of the University of Padua’s study in Comprehensive Psychiatry omitted the statistic, and said in comment “Significant age differences were observed showing a decrease in NSSI as age increases” and “No gender differences have emerged.”
Where the bald-faced lie “no gender difference have emerged” and the omission of the statistic obscure the fact that Non-Suicidal Self Harm is exponentially greater among females than it is among males.
I have exposed the duplicity of Sally McManus, Elisa Mancinelli, the City University of London, the University of Padua, and the esteemed Scientific journals Lancet Psychiatry and Comprehensive Psychiatry by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
From 2000 to 2014, the prevalence of self-reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm in England increased by 166.6%, or by more than one and a half times, from 2.4% to 6.4%.
1st Author Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, and described it only-generally as “increased”.
Where the general “increased” and the omission of the statistic obscure the fact that microwave radiation from technology has led to an exponential increase in Non-Suicidal Self Harm.
I have exposed the duplicity of Sally McManus, the City University of London and the esteemed journal Lancet Psychiatry by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
From 2000 to 2014, the proportion of the men and boys in England reporting Non-Suicidal Self Harm to relieve unpleasant feelings of anger, tension, anxiety, or depression increased by 185.7%, or by almost three times, from 1.4% to 4%.
1st Author Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, and described it only-generally as an “increase in prevalence.”
Where the general “increase in prevalence” obscures the fact that microwave radiation from technology has led to an exponential increase in Non-Suicidal Self Harm.
In January 2022, 1st Author Elisa Mancinelli of the University of Padua’s study in Comprehensive Psychiatry omitted the statistic.
Elisa’s omission of the statistic obscures the fact that microwave radiation from technology has led to an exponential increase in Non-Suicidal Self Harm.
I have exposed the duplicity of Sally McManus, Elisa Mancinelli, the City University of London, the University of Padua, and the esteemed Scientific journals Lancet Psychiatry and Comprehensive Psychiatry by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
From 2000 to 2014, the proportion of the women and girls in England reporting Non-Suicidal Self Harm to relieve unpleasant feelings of anger, tension, anxiety, or depression increased by 223.8%, or by more than three times, from 2.1% to 6.8%.
1st Author Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, and described it as an “increase in prevalence.”
Where the hedging generality “increase in prevalence” and the omission of the statistic both obscure the fact that microwave radiation from technology has led to an exponential increase in Non-Suicidal Self Harm.
In January 2022, 1st Author Elisa Mancinelli of the University of Padua’s study in Comprehensive Psychiatry omitted the statistic.
Elisa’s omission of the statistic obscures the fact that microwave radiation from technology has led to an exponential increase in Non-Suicidal Self Harm.
I have exposed the duplicity of Sally McManus, Elisa Mancinelli, the City University of London, the University of Padua, and the esteemed Scientific journals Lancet Psychiatry and Comprehensive Psychiatry by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
From 2000 to 2014, the prevalence of self-reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm among women and girls aged 16-24 years in England increased by 203%, or by three times, from 6.5% to 19.7%.
1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London’s 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, and described it only-generally as “increased”.
Where the hedging generality “increased” and the omission of the statistic both obscure the fact that microwave radiation from technology has led to an exponential increase in Non-Suicidal Self Harm.
From 2000 to 2014, Non-Suicidal Self Harm among female respondents in England increased by 188.5%, or by almost three times, from 2.6% to 7.5%.
1st Author Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic.
Where the omission of the statistic obscures the fact that microwave radiation from technology has led to an exponential increase in Non-Suicidal Self Harm.
From 2000 to 2007, Non-Suicidal Self Harm among blacks in England decreased by 21.4%, from 2.8% to 2.2%.
1st Author Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, to obscure the fact that suicides among black were decreasing by a significant amount, even as they increased exponentially among whites.
From 2000 to 2007, Non-Suicidal Self Harm among female respondents in England increased by 38.5%, from 2.6% to 3.6%.
1st Author Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic.
Where the omission of the statistic obscures the fact that microwave radiation from technology has led to an exponential increase in Non-Suicidal Self Harm.
From 2000 to 2007, Non-Suicidal Self Harm among whites in England increased by 50%, from 2.4% to 3.6%.
1st Author Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic.
Where the omission of the statistic obscures the fact that microwave radiation from technology has led to an exponential increase in Non-Suicidal Self Harm.
From 2000 to 2007, Non-Suicidal Self Harm among male respondents in England increased by 75%, from 2% to 3.5%.
1st Author Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic.
Where the omission of the statistic obscures the fact that microwave radiation from technology has led to an exponential increase in Non-Suicidal Self Harm.
From 2000 to 2007, the 50% increase in Non-Suicidal Self Harm among whites in England was 335.8% greater, or well more than four times greater than its 21.4% decrease among blacks.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, and said, only-generally “The prevalence of NSSH did not differ significantly between ethnic groups in any wave”.
While technically a true statement, it is sleight-of-hand, a misdirection, to keep you from discerning that Non-Suicidal Self Harm is increasing hyper-exponentially among whites, even as it decreases among blacks.
In 2000, .187%, or 2 of 1,071 respondents in England aged 65 to 71 reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
Sally’s study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2000, .921%, or 11 of 1,194 respondents in England aged 56 to 64 reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
Sally’s study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2000, 1.35%, or 18 of 1,331 respondents in England aged 45 to 54 reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
Sally’s study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2000, the proportion of the men and boys in England reporting Non-Suicidal Self Harm to relieve unpleasant feelings of anger, tension, anxiety, or depression was 1.4%, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
Sally’s study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2000, 1.6%, or 2 of 127 other or mixed respondents in England reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
Sally’s study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2000, 2%, or 3 of 151 asian respondents in England reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
Sally’s study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2000, 2%, or 65 of 3,237 male respondents in England reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
Sally’s study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2000, the proportion of the women and girls in England reporting Non-Suicidal Self Harm to relieve unpleasant feelings of anger, tension, anxiety, or depression was 2.1%, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
Sally’s study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2000, 2.4%, or 159 of 6,379 white respondents in England in England reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
In 2000, the prevalence of self-reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm in England was 2.4%, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
Sally’s study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2000, 2.6%, or 105 of 4006 female respondents in England reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
Sally’s study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2000, 2.7%, or 42 of 1,540 respondents in England aged 35 to 44 reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
Sally’s study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2000, 2.8%, or 5 of 179 of black respondents in England reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
Sally’s study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2000, 4.2%, or 60 of 1,441 respondents in England aged 25 to 34 reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
Sally’s study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2000, 5.6%, or 37 of 665 respondents in England aged 16 to 24 reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
Sally’s study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2000, the prevalence of self-reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm among women and girls aged 16-24 years was 6.5%, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
Sally’s study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2000, the 2.6% of female respondents in England who reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm was 30% greater, or almost one third greater than the 2% of male respondents who did the same.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, listed the percentages as 49.9% male, and 50.1% female, and said, only-generally “Prevalence was similar in male and female participants in 2000”.
Rates of Non-Suicidal Self Harm which vary by 30% cannot in good faith be described as “similar”.
I have exposed the duplicity of Sally McManus, the City University of London and the esteemed Scientific journal Lancet Psychiatry by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In 2000, the 5.6% rate of Non-Suicidal Self Harm among respondents in England aged 16 to 24 was 33.3% greater, or one third greater than the 4.2% rate among those aged 25 to 34.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, and said, only-generally “NSSH was most prevalent in the youngest age groups and least prevalent in the oldest age groups”.
Where the hedging generalities “most prevalent” and “least prevalent” and the omission of the statistic all obscure the fact that the variable is technology use.
In 2000, the 1.35% rate of Non-Suicidal Self Harm among respondents in England aged 45 to 54 was 46.6% greater than the .921% rate among those aged 56 to 64.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, and said, only-generally “NSSH was most prevalent in the youngest age groups and least prevalent in the oldest age groups”.
Where the hedging generalities “most prevalent” and “least prevalent” and the omission of the statistic all obscure the fact that the variable is technology use.
In 2000, the 2.1% of women and girls in England reporting Non-Suicidal Self Harm to relieve unpleasant feelings of anger, tension, anxiety, or depression was 50% greater, or half again greater than the 1.4% of men and boys who did the same.
1st Author Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, to obscure the fact that Non-Suicidal Self Harm is exponentially greater among females than it is among males.
In January 2022, 1st Author Elisa Mancinelli of the University of Padua’s study in Comprehensive Psychiatry omitted the statistic, and said in comment “No gender differences have emerged.”
Where the bald-faced lie “no gender differences have emerged” and the omission of the statistic both obscure the fact that Non-Suicidal Self Harm is exponentially greater among females than it is among males.
I have exposed the duplicity of Sally McManus, Elisa Mancinelli, the City University of London, the University of Padua, and the esteemed Scientific journals Lancet Psychiatry and Comprehensive Psychiatry by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In 2000, the 4.2% rate of Non-Suicidal Self Harm among respondents in England aged 25 to 34 was 55.6% greater, or more than half again greater than the 2.7% rate among those aged 35 to 44.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, and said, only-generally “NSSH was most prevalent in the youngest age groups and least prevalent in the oldest age groups”.
Where the hedging generalities “most prevalent” and “least prevalent” and the omission of the statistic all obscure the fact that the variable is technology use.
I have exposed the duplicity of Sally McManus, the City University of London and the esteemed Scientific journal Lancet Psychiatry by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In 2000, the 2.7% rate of Non-Suicidal Self Harm among respondents in England aged 35 to 44 was 100% greater, or two times greater than the 1.35% rate among those aged 45 to 54.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, and said “NSSH was most prevalent in the youngest age groups and least prevalent in the oldest age groups”.
Where the hedging generalities “most prevalent” and “least prevalent” and the omission of the statistic all obscure the fact that the variable is technology use.
I have exposed the duplicity of Sally McManus, the City University of London and the esteemed Scientific journal Lancet Psychiatry by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In 2000, the 6.5% prevalence of the prevalence of self-reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm among women and girls in England aged 16-24 years was 170.8% greater, or almost three times greater than its 2.4% prevalence among the general populace.
1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London’s 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, and said “Prevalence was similar in male and female participants in 2000”, and “Increases in prevalence were noted in both sexes and across age groups—most notably in women and girls aged 16–24 years”.
Where the bald-faced lie “prevalence was similar in male and female participants” and the omission of the statistic obscure the fact that Non-Suicidal Self Harm is exponentially greater among females than it is among males.
1st First Author Elisa Mancinelli of the University of Padua’s study in Comprehensive Psychiatry in January 2022 omitted the statistic, and said in comment “No gender differences have emerged.”
Where the bald-faced lie “no gender difference have emerged” and the omission of the statistic obscure the fact that Non-Suicidal Self Harm is exponentially greater among females than it is among males.
I have exposed the duplicity of Sally McManus, Elisa Mancinelli, the City University of London, the University of Padua, and the esteemed Scientific journals ’s Lancet Psychiatry and Comprehensive Psychiatry by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In 2000, the .921% rate of Non-Suicidal Self Harm among respondents in England aged 56 to 64 was 392.5% greater, or almost five times greater than the .187% rate among those aged 65 to 71 years.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, and said, “NSSH was most prevalent in the youngest age groups and least prevalent in the oldest age groups”.
Where the hedging generalities “most prevalent” and “least prevalent” and the omission of the statistic all obscure the fact that the variable is technology use.
From 2007 to 2014, the 79.3% positive variance in Non-Suicidal Self Harm among females in England versus 2000 to 2007 was 19% greater, or basically one fifth greater than the 66.6% positive variance among males during the same time period.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, to obscure the fact that Non-Suicidal Self Harm is exponentially greater among females than it is among males.
1st Author Elisa Mancinelli’s January 2022 study in Comprehensive Psychiatry omitted the statistic, and said in comment “No gender differences have emerged.”
Where the bald-faced lie “no gender differences have emerged” and the omission of the statistic obscure a one-fifth greater rate of increase in Non-Suicidal Self Harm among women, vs. men.
I have exposed the duplicity of Sally McManus, Elisa Mancinelli, the City University of London, the University of Padua, and the esteemed Scientific journals Lancet Psychiatry and Comprehensive Psychiatry by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
From 2000 to 2007, Non-Suicidal Self Harm among female respondents in England increased by 38.5%, from 2.6% to 3.6%.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, to obscure the fact that microwave radiation from technology has led to an exponential increase in Non-Suicidal Self Harm.
I have exposed the duplicity of Sally McManus, the City University of London and the esteemed Scientific journal Lancet Psychiatry by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
From 2007 to 2014, the 125% increase in Non-Suicidal Self Harm among male respondents in England was 66.6% greater than its 75% increase from 2000 to 2007.
The rate of Non-Suicidal Self Harm is increasing exponentially, going forward in time, because the damage from microwave radiation is cumulative and dose dependent.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, to obscure the fact that microwave radiation from technology has led to an exponential increase in Non-Suicidal Self Harm.
I have exposed the duplicity of Sally McManus, the City University of London and the esteemed Scientific journal Lancet Psychiatry by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
From 2007 to 2014, respondents in England who reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm increased by 79.3%, or by almost two times, from 227 to 407.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, to obscure the fact that microwave radiation from technology has led to an exponential increase in Non-Suicidal Self Harm.
I have exposed the duplicity of Sally McManus, the City University of London and the esteemed Scientific journal Lancet Psychiatry by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
From 2007 to 2014, Non-Suicidal Self Harm among female respondents in England increased by 108.3%, or by more than two times, from 3.6% to 7.5%.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, to obscure the fact that microwave radiation from technology has led to an exponential increase in Non-Suicidal Self Harm.
I have exposed the duplicity of Sally McManus, the City University of London and the esteemed Scientific journal Lancet Psychiatry by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
From 2007 to 2014, Non-Suicidal Self Harm among male respondents in England increased by 125%, or by well more than two times, from 2% to 4.5%.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, to obscure the fact that microwave radiation from technology has led to an exponential increase in Non-Suicidal Self Harm.
I have exposed the duplicity of Sally McManus, the City University of London and the esteemed Scientific journal Lancet Psychiatry by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
From 2007 to 2014, the 108.3% increase in Non-Suicidal Self Harm among female respondents in England was 181.3% greater, or almost three times greater than its 38.5% increase from 2000 to 2007.
The rate of Non-Suicidal Self Harm is increasing exponentially, going forward in time, because the damage from microwave radiation is cumulative and dose dependent.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, to obscure the fact that microwave radiation from technology has led to an exponential increase in Non-Suicidal Self Harm.
I have exposed the duplicity of Sally McManus, the City University of London and the esteemed Scientific journal Lancet Psychiatry by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In 2007, 227 respondents in England reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
In 2007, 2%, or 4 of 196 of asians in England reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic.
In 2007, 2%, or just 4 of Other or mixed respondents in England reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic.
In 2007, 2%, or just 4 of 196 Asian respondents in England reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
Given that the Chinese have the highest percentage of Neanderthal DNA on Earth, at 40%, this demonstrates that schizophrenia/demonic possession is greatest in the R1b haplogroup offshoot of Homo neanderthalensis, aka the Line of Cain, which was created when the red-haired, blue-eyed, white-skinned she-demon Lilith interbred with the Neanderthal “Asian” Adam around 10,000 years ago.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic.
In 2007, 2.2%, or 4 of 183 blacks in England reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
Sally’s study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table.
In 2007, the 3.6% of female respondents in England who reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm was 2.9% greater than the 3.5% of males who did the same.
1st Author Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, to obscure the fact that Non-Suicidal Self Harm is exponentially greater among females than it is among males.
In January 2022, 1st Author Elisa Mancinelli of the University of Padua’s study in Comprehensive Psychiatry omitted the statistic, and said in comment “No gender differences have emerged.”
Where the bald-faced lie “no gender differences have emerged” and the omission of the statistic both obscure the fact that Non-Suicidal Self Harm is exponentially greater among females than it is among males.
I have exposed the duplicity of Sally McManus, Elisa Mancinelli, the City University of London, the University of Padua, and the esteemed Scientific journals Lancet Psychiatry and Comprehensive Psychiatry by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In 2007, 3.5%, or 98 of 2,824 male respondents in England reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2007, 3.6%, or 131 of 3,620 female respondents in England reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2007, 3.6%, or 211 of 5,876 white respondents in England reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2007, 3.6%, or 211 of 5876 whites in England reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2007, 4% or just 8 of 227 black respondents in England reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2007, 5.1%, or 8 of 156 Other or mixed in England reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2007, the 3.6% of whites in England who reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm was 63.6% greater, or nearly two thirds greater than the 2.2% rate among blacks who did the same.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, to obscure the fact that schizophrenia, or what was known in the old days as demonic possession is an inherited condition of the distinct and separate race of human which we refer to as Homo neanderthalensis, specifically via the R1b haplogroup, which is the bloodline of Cain, passed down along the maternal line from the she-demon Lilith roughly ten thousand years ago.
In 2007, the 3.6% of white respondents in England who reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm was 80% greater, or almost two times greater than the 2% of Asian respondents who did the same.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
Given that the Chinese have the highest percentage of Neanderthal DNA on Earth, at 40%, this demonstrates that schizophrenia/demonic possession is greatest in the R1b haplogroup offshoot of Homo neanderthalensis, aka the Line of Cain, which was created when the red-haired, blue-eyed, white-skinned she-demon Lilith interbred with the Neanderthal “Asian” Adam around 10,000 years ago.
In 2007, 211 of 227, or 93%, or nearly all of the people in England who reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm were white.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic, to obscure the fact that schizophrenia, or what was known in the old days as demonic possession is an inherited condition of the distinct and separate race of human which we refer to as Homo neanderthalensis, specifically via the R1b haplogroup, which is the bloodline of Cain, passed down along the maternal line from the she-demon Lilith roughly ten thousand years ago.
In 2007, the 93% of people in England who reported who reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm who were white was 1,062% greater, or more than eleven times greater than the 8% of people in England who reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm who were black.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic, to obscure the fact that schizophrenia, or what was known in the old days as demonic possession is an inherited condition of the distinct and separate race of human which we refer to as Homo neanderthalensis, specifically via the R1b haplogroup, which is the bloodline of Cain, passed down along the maternal line from the she-demon Lilith roughly ten thousand years ago.
In 2014, 407 respondents in England reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
In 2014, 1.4%, or 16 of 1,187 of respondents in England aged 65 to 74 reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic, to obscure the fact that the lowest rate of Non-Suicidal Self Harm in all the age groups is the age group which started using technology the latest, and it is the group which uses technology the least.
In 2014, 3.7%, or 45 of 1,226 respondents in England aged 55 to 64 reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2014, the proportion of the men and boys in England reporting Non-Suicidal Self Harm to relieve unpleasant feelings of anger, tension, anxiety, or depression was 4%, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2014, 4.3%, or 55 of 1293 respondents in England aged 45 to 54 reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2014, 4.5%, or 119 of 2,638 male respondents in England reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2014, 5.5%, or 10 of 182 of black respondents in England reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm. .
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2014, the prevalence of self-reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm in England was 6.4%, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2014, 6.4%, or 370 of 5770 of the white respondents in England reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2014, the proportion of the women and girls in England reporting Non-Suicidal Self Harm to relieve unpleasant feelings of anger, tension, anxiety, or depression was 6.8%, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
Sally’s study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table.
In 2014, 7.4%, or 87 of 1,178 respondents in England aged 35 to 44 reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2014, 7.5%, or 291 of 3,893 female respondents in England reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2014, 7.6%, or 291 of 3839 female respondents in England reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
In 2014, 11.3%, or 117 of 1034 respondents in England aged 25 to 34 reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic.
In 2014, 16.1%, or 90 of 559 respondents in England aged 16 to 24 reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry buried the data in a separate table, and omitted the statistic, to obscure the fact that the greatest rate of Non-Suicidal Self Harm is in the group which started using technology the at the earliest age, and which uses technology the most.
In 2014, the 4.3% of respondents in England aged 45 to 54 who reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm was 16.2% greater, or almost one fifth greater than the 3.7% of respondents aged 55 to 64 who did the same.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, and said, only-generally “NSSH was most prevalent in the youngest age groups and least prevalent in the oldest age groups”.
Where the hedging generalities “most prevalent” and “least prevalent” and the omission of the statistic all obscure the fact that the variable is technology use.
I’m theorizing that the younger people have a significantly greater rate of Non-Suicidal Self Harm because they were exposed to technology at an earlier age, and also because they use technology more assiduously.
In 2014, the 6.4% of of white respondents in England who reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm was 16.4% greater than the 5.5% of black respondents who did the same.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, to obscure the fact that schizophrenia, or what was known in the old days as demonic possession is an inherited condition of the distinct and separate race of human which we refer to as Homo neanderthalensis, specifically via the R1b haplogroup, which is the bloodline of Cain, passed down along the maternal line from the she-demon Lilith roughly ten thousand years ago.
In 2014, the prevalence of self-reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm among women and girls in England aged 16-24 years was 19.7%, per 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London in 2019.
In 2014, the 16.1% of respondents in England aged 16 to 24 who reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm was 42.5% greater, or almost half again greater than the 11.3% increase among respondents aged 25 to 34.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, and said, only-generally “NSSH was most prevalent in the youngest age groups and least prevalent in the oldest age groups”.
Where the hedging generalities “most prevalent” and “least prevalent” and the omission of the statistic all obscure the fact that the variable is technology use.
I have exposed the duplicity of Sally McManus, the City University of London and the esteemed Scientific journal Lancet Psychiatry by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In 2014, the 11.3% of respondents in England aged 25 to 34 who reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm was 52.7% greater, or basically half again greater than the 7.4% of respondents aged 35 to 44 who did the same.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, and said, only-generally “NSSH was most prevalent in the youngest age groups and least prevalent in the oldest age groups”.
Where the hedging generalities “most prevalent” and “least prevalent” and the omission of the statistic all obscure the fact that the variable is technology use.
I have exposed the duplicity of Sally McManus, the City University of London and the esteemed Scientific journal Lancet Psychiatry by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In 2014, the 7.5% female respondents in England who reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm was 66.6% greater, or two thirds greater than the 4.5% of men who did the same.
1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London’s 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, and said “Increases in prevalence were noted in both sexes and across age groups”.
Where the hedging generality “increases in prevalence” and the omission of the statistic obscure the fact that Non-Suicidal Self Harm is exponentially greater among females than it is among males.
1st First Author Elisa Mancinelli of the University of Padua’s study in Comprehensive Psychiatry in January 2022 omitted the statistic, and said in comment “No gender differences have emerged.”
Where the bald-faced lie “no gender differences have emerged” obscure the fact that Non-Suicidal Self Harm is exponentially greater among females than it is among males.
I have exposed the duplicity of the City University of London’s Sally McManus, Elisa Mancinelli, the City University of London, the University of Padua, and the esteemed Scientific journals Lancet Psychiatry and Comprehensive Psychiatry by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In 2014, the 7.6% of female respondents in England who reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm was 68.8% greater, or well more than half again greater than the 4.5% of males who did the same.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, and said, only-generally “in 2014, prevalence increased in both sexes and in all age groups.”
Where the general “increased in both sexes” and the omission of the statistic obscure the fact that Non-Suicidal Self Harm is exponentially greater among females than it is among males.
1st First Author Elisa Mancinelli of the University of Padua’s study in Comprehensive Psychiatry in January 2022 omitted the statistic, and said in comment “No gender differences have emerged.”
Where the bald-faced lie “no gender differences have emerged” and the omission of the statistic obscure the fact that Non-Suicidal Self Harm is exponentially greater among females than it is among males.
I have exposed the duplicity of Sally McManus, Elisa Mancinelli, the City University of London, the University of Padua, and the esteemed Scientific journals Lancet Psychiatry and Comprehensive Psychiatry by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In 2014, the 6.8% of women and girls in England reporting Non-Suicidal Self Harm to relieve unpleasant feelings of anger, tension, anxiety, or depression was 70% greater, or well more than half again greater than the 4% rate among men and boys.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, and said, only-generally “in 2014, prevalence increased in both sexes and in all age groups.”
Where the hedging generality “prevalence increased among both sexes” and the omission of the statistic obscure the fact that Non-Suicidal Self Harm is exponentially greater among females than it is among males.
1st Author Elisa Mancinelli of the University of Padua’s January 2022 study in Comprehensive Psychiatry omitted the statistic, and said in comment “No gender differences have emerged.”
Where the bald-faced lie “no gender differences have emerged” and the omission of the statistic obscure the fact that Non-Suicidal Self Harm is exponentially greater among females than it is among males.
I have exposed the duplicity of Sally McManus, Elisa Mancinelli, the City University of London, the University of Padua and the esteemed Scientific journals Lancet Psychiatry and Comprehensive Psychiatry by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In 2014, the 7.4% of respondents in England aged 35 to 44 reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm was 72% greater, or well more than half again greater than the 4.3% increase among respondents aged 45 to 54.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, and said, only-generally “NSSH was most prevalent in the youngest age groups and least prevalent in the oldest age groups”.
Where the hedging generalities “most prevalent” and “least prevalent” and the omission of the statistic all obscure the fact that the variable is technology use.
These people were born between 1970 and 1979. The real onslaught began around 1998, when they were 18 to 27 years old.
I have exposed the duplicity of Sally McManus, the City University of London and the esteemed Scientific journal Lancet Psychiatry by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In 2014, 90.9%, or 370 or 407 or almost all of the respondents in England who reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm were white.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, to obscure the fact that schizophrenia, or what was known in the old days as demonic possession is an inherited condition of the distinct and separate race of human which we refer to as Homo neanderthalensis, specifically via the R1b haplogroup, which is the bloodline of Cain, passed down along the maternal line from the she-demon Lilith roughly ten thousand years ago.
In 2014, the 3.7% of respondents in England aged 65 to 74 who reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm was 164.3% greater, or more than two and a half times greater than the 1.4% of respondents aged 65 to 74 who did the same.
The City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry omitted the statistic, and said, only-generally “NSSH was most prevalent in the youngest age groups and least prevalent in the oldest age groups”.
Where the hedging generalities “most prevalent” and “least prevalent” and the omission of the statistic all obscure the fact that the variable is technology use.
In 2014, the 19.7% the prevalence of self-reported Non-Suicidal Self Harm among women and girls aged 16-24 years in England was 207.8% greater, or more than three times greater than its 6.4% prevalence among the general populace.
First Author Elisa Mancinelli of the University of Padua’s study in Comprehensive Psychiatry in January 2022 omitted the statistic, and said in comment “No gender differences have emerged.”
Where the bald-faced lie “no gender differences have emerged” and the omission of the statistic obscure the fact that Non-Suicidal Self Harm is exponentially greater among females than it is among males.
I have exposed the duplicity of Elisa Mancinelli, the University of Padua and the esteemed Scientific journal Comprehensive Psychiatry by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In 2019, Lancet Psychiatry published “Prevalence of non-suicidal self-harm and service contact in England, 2000–14: repeated cross-sectional surveys of the general population”, by 1st Author Sally McManus of the City University of London.
Here’s a screen shot from it:
(Prevalence of non-suicidal self-harm ever (face-to-face report) in 16–74-year-olds in England in 2000, 2007, and 2014)
It stated, only-generally, “Increases in prevalence were noted in both sexes and across age groups—most notably in women and girls aged 16–24 years”.
Where the general “increases in prevalence” obscures exponentially-greater rates of Non-Suicidal Self Harm among females, versus males.
To name only one example out of many, in 2014, the 7.5% rate of Non-Suicidal Self Harm among females in England was 66.6% greater, or two thirds greater than the 4.5% rate among of males.
Here’s a picture of the City University of London’s Sally McManus, with a Satanic green Kabbalist “Tree of Life” background, and where the image is constructed to focus attention on her left eye.
(Sally McManus)
I have included Sally McManus’ picture so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist Freemason of marginal influence looks like.
The image is constructed to focus attention on her left eye because, to generational Satanist Freemasons, the left eye is “the eye of Will” or “the eye of Horus”.
‘The right eye is the Eye of Ra and the left is the Eye of Horus’.”
From “Freemasonry - Religion And Belief - The 3rd Temple”
Facebook: “Welcome to the Left-Hand-Path-Network, where Satanism is not about worship, but it’s study.”
Generational Satanist Freemasons are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise roughly twenty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
In January 2022, Comprehensive Psychiatry published “A network analysis on self-harming and problematic smartphone use – The role of self-control, internalizing and externalizing problems in a sample of self-harming adolescents”, by 1st Author Elisa Mancinelli of the University of Padua’s Department of Developmental Psychology and Socialization in Padua, Italy.
Referencing the City University of London’s Sally McManus’ 2019 study in Lancet Psychiatry, Ms. Mancinelli’s results stated: “Significant age differences were observed showing a decrease in NSSI as age increases (stat = −2.86; adj.p = .029). No gender differences have emerged.”
Where the bald-faced lie “no gender differences have emerged” obscures exponentially-greater rates of Non-Suicidal Self Harm among females, versus males.
To name only one example out of many, in 2000, the 2.1% of women and girls in England reporting Non-Suicidal Self Harm to relieve unpleasant feelings of anger, tension, anxiety, or depression was 50% greater, or half again greater than the 1.4% of men and boys who did the same.
Elisa’s statement that there is “a decrease in NSSI as age increases” Satanically inverts the truth, namely that rates of Non-Suicidal Self Harm are exponentially greater among the young because they started using technology at an earlier age, and because they use that technology far more assiduously.
Here’s a picture of Elisa Mancinelli, with a Kabbalist “Tree of Life” background, where her arms are crossed in a purportedly-secret Masonic “gesture of recognition”, and where the image is constructed to focus attention on her left eye.
(Elisa Mancinelli of the University of Padua’s Department of Developmental Psychology and Socialization)
For any Coincidence theorists lingering in the readership, here is a 19th Century depiction of the same purportedly-secret Masonic crossed-arms gesture of recognition that the University of Padua’s Elisa Mancinelli is in the photo immediately above.
(19th Century Masonic depiction of their own purportedly-secret “folded arms” gesture of recognition.)
I have included Elisa Mancinelli’s picture so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist Freemason of marginal influence looks like.
The image is constructed to focus attention on her left eye because, to generational Satanist Freemasons, the left eye is “the eye of Will” or “the eye of Horus”.
‘The right eye is the Eye of Ra and the left is the Eye of Horus’.”
From “Freemasonry - Religion And Belief - The 3rd Temple”
Facebook: “Welcome to the Left-Hand-Path-Network, where Satanism is not about worship, but it’s study.”
Generational Satanist Freemasons are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise roughly twenty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
Jeff Miller, Pittsburgh, PA, May 21, 2025
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, please send me a note at [email protected]
