THE CREATION AND BARELY-COVERT INTERNATIONAL RELEASE OF “COVID-19”
“Fables should be taught as fables, myths as myths, and miracles as poetic fancies. To teach superstitions as truths is a most terrible thing. The child mind accepts and believes them, and only through great pain and perhaps tragedy can he be in after years relieved of them. In fact, men will fight for a superstition quite as quickly as for a living truth — often more so, since a superstition is so intangible you cannot get at it to refute it, but truth is a point of view, and so is changeable.”
― Hypathia of Alexandria
“The more outré and grotesque an incident is the more carefully it deserves to be examined.”
From “The Hound of the Baskervilles”, by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, 1902
'Tis surprising to see how rapidly a panic will sometimes run through a country. All nations and ages have been subject to them. Britain has trembled like an ague at the report of a French fleet of flat-bottomed boats; and in the fifteenth century the whole English army, after ravaging the kingdom of France, was driven back like men petrified with fear; and this brave exploit was performed by a few broken forces collected and headed by a woman, Joan of Arc. Would that heaven might inspire some Jersey maid to spirit up her countrymen, and save her fair fellow sufferers from ravage and ravishment!
Yet panics, in some cases, have their uses; they produce as much good as hurt. Their duration is always short; the mind soon grows through them, and acquires a firmer habit than before. But their peculiar advantage is, that they are the touchstones of sincerity and hypocrisy, and bring things and men to light, which might otherwise have lain forever undiscovered. In fact, they have the same effect on secret traitors, which an imaginary apparition would have upon a private murderer. They sift out the hidden thoughts of man, and hold them up in public to the world. Many a disguised Tory has lately shown his head, that shall penitentially solemnize with curses the day on which Howe arrived upon the Delaware.
From “The American Crisis, No. 1”, by Thomas Paine, 1776
“I cry you mercy!” interrupted the Chancellor, who saw a dangerous enthusiasm rising in the King’s face. “March upon Paris? Does your Excellency forget that the way bristles with English strongholds?”
“That for your English strongholds!” and Joan snapped her fingers scornfully. “Whence have we marched in these last days? From Gien. And whither? To Rheims. What bristled between? English strongholds. What are they now? French ones—and they never cost a blow!” Here applause broke out from the group of generals, and Joan had to pause a moment to let it subside. “Yes, English strongholds bristled before us; now French ones bristle behind us. What is the argument? A child can read it. The strongholds between us and Paris are garrisoned by no new breed of English, but by the same breed as those others—with the same fears, the same questionings, the same weaknesses, the same disposition to see the heavy hand of God descending upon them. We have but to march!—on the instant—and they are ours, Paris is ours, France is ours!”
From “Saint Joan of Arc”, by Mark Twain, 1896
(Cover, Saint Joan of Arc, by Mark Twain, 1896)
“The swing of his nature took him from extreme languor to devouring energy; and as I knew well, he was never so truly formidable as when, for days on end, he had been lounging in his armchair amid his improvisations and his black-letter editions. Then it was that the lust of the chase would suddenly come upon him, and that his brilliant reasoning power would rise to the level of intuition, until those who were unacquainted with his methods would look askance at him as on a man whose knowledge was not that of other mortals. When I saw him that afternoon so enwrapped in the music of St. James’s Hall I felt that an evil time might be coming upon those whom he had set himself to hunt down.”
Dr. John Watson, from “The Red Headed League”, by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, 1891
THE WORD “COVID” MEANS “CONSPIRACY, FRAUD, TRICKERY”
COVID-19 - noun - A highly contagious respiratory disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
-id - suffix
of or pertaining to; appended to words to make an English adjective or noun form.
Forming nouns from Latin or Greek roots, being suffixed to the name of their progenitors and meaning “descendant(s) of”
Covin - noun -from Old French, from medieval Latin convenium, from Latin convenire (see convene).
collusive agreement between two or more persons to the detriment of a third :conspiracy. b archaic : fraud, trickery
Compare with coven:
Coven - noun - mid 17th century: variant of covin.
a group or gathering of witches who meet regularly.
often derogatory
a secret or close-knit group of associates.
“covens of militants within the party”
-īnus (feminine -īna, neuter -īnum); first/second-declension suffix
Of or pertaining to; -ine; usually indicates a relationship of position, possession, or origin.
Descendants[edit]
Catalan: -í
English: -ine
French: -in
Galician: -iño, -ino
Italian: -ino
Portuguese: -ino, -inho
Romanian: -in
Spanish: -ino
con·fi·dence game- confidence trick; plural noun: confidence tricks; noun: confidence game; plural noun: confidence games
a swindle in which the victim is persuaded to trust the swindler in some way.
In 1981, Dean Koontz published a novel called “The Eyes of Darkness”. It features a weaponized virus called “Wuhan-400”.
Here’s a sentence from the novel: "The Chinese tested it on God knows how many political prisoners. They were never able to find an antibody or an antibiotic that was effective against it. The virus migrates to the brain stem, and there it begins secreting a toxin that literally eats away brain tissue like battery acid dissolving cheesecloth.”
That is an example of what is known in criminal parlance as “the set-up”.
In 2012, Dr. Anthony Fauci said “In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic? Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario — however remote — should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this decision?"
Scientists working in this field might say — as indeed I have said — that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks. It is more likely that a pandemic would occur in nature, and the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that might appear to be risky.
Within the research community, many have expressed concern that important research progress could come to a halt just because of the fear that someone, somewhere, mightattempt to replicate these experiments sloppily. This is a valid concern,” he wrote.
Here, Anthony Fauci is blowing a lot of smoke to protect the “important research” to develop weaponized pathogens.
In 2014, despite Anthony Fauci’s protestations, a moratorium was placed upon gain-of-function research.
In 2014, the National Institute of Health, not at all deterred by the moratorium, awarded a $3.7 million grant to the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China and a non-profit in New York City known as EcoHealth. It was called “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence.”
The Orwellianly-named EcoHealth had gotten the Confidence game rolling decades earlier with a front organization called “Wildlife Trust”. At that time, they were purporting to be trying to “help save manatees and pygmy elephants”.
It’s similar to how the fictitious professional killer James Bond professed to work for “Universal Exports”.
The 2014 collaboration between EcoHealth and the Wuhan Institute of Virology involved an experiment in which they created a hybrid virus from a bat coronavirus.
“Ecohealth” did and does not have any actual scientists doing experiments. Rather, they collaborate with other scientists and organizations around the world with a heavy focus on virus hunting, essentially trying to find pathogens in nature at high risk of a spillover to the human population from animals. And then, they do what is known as “gain-of-function” research, in which they try to increase the transmissibility or severity of infection of those pathogens.
One of the viruses they hunted down and found - in China! - was called WIV1. They combined human genetic material with WIV1 and injected this new chimeric virus or hybrid virus into genetically altered mice, and found that when this virus went into these genetically altered mice, it reproduced more quickly and was more pathogenic than the original.
“Ecohealth” also performed an experiment on the extremely-deadly MERS virus in which they created infectious clones of MERS and swapped out the virus’ receptor binding domain, which is a part of this spike protein, which enables it to infect humans.
In 2017, the NIH resumed gain-of-function research, but with a set of guidelines called P3CO, which were supposed to closely scrutinize the work and protect the populace from any dangers that might emerge. Peter Daszak, who is the head of EcoHealth Alliance, actually crafted language that allowed the National Institute of Health bypass its own rules.
Here’s Peter Daszak’s picture, wearing a Satanic purple tie, with his arms folded in a Masonic “gesture of recognition”:
[image]
(Peter Daszak, wearing a Satanic purple tie, with his arms folded in a Masonic “gesture of recognition”. Peter used $3.7 million U.S. tax dollars to work with the Wuhan Institute of Virology to create a hybrid virus from a bat coronavirus.)
I’ve included his photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of significant influence looks like.
They’re all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth.
It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
EcoHealth’s Director, Peter Daszak crafted the language and handed it over to NIH, who inserted in the final agreement with no alteration.
The work was being done at the Wuhan lab in China, and the National Institute of Health was relying on the word of the grantee, Ecolab, to tell them that it was going well.
Peter Daszak never revealed the exact nature of these experiments. He had not talked about how risky they, in fact, were.
In 2017, the Smithsonian Magazine widened its eyes to simulate honesty and asked “Is China Ground Zero for a Future Pandemic?”
Here, three years prior to the barely-covert international release of a Chinese bat virus with four amino acids added for the improved transmissibility to humans, we have an example of what is known in criminal parlance as “the set-up”.
In late 2017 and early 2018, EcoHealth Alliance applied for another grant, this one from a subagency in the United States Department of Defense called DARPA. In it, they proposed to go to China’s bat caves, and sample bats for coronaviruses, and take those back to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
In the grant, they proposed to insert cleavage sites, similar to the “mystifying” furin cleavage site in the SARS-CoV-2 genetic sequence, and to insert those into their coronavirus sequences to see if it would make them more infectious.
The grant materials, which have since been obtained via the Freedom of Information Act, say very clearly that the work had been conducted.
When the National Institute of Health initially released the documents, one progress report had been filed two years later, and the other one was missing entirely. Those are the two years immediately leading up to the start of the pandemic.
In 2018, the AMA introduced three new CPT codes to incentivize the adoption of Remote Patient Monitoring, or RPM.
Here, two years prior to the barely-covert international release of a Chinese bat virus with four amino acids added for the improved transmissibility to humans, we have yet another example of what is known in criminal parlance as “the set-up”.
In 2018 and 2019, Dr. Charles Lieber, Chair of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Harvard University, lied to federal authorities about his affiliation with the Wuhan University of Technology.
From 2019 to 2020 the revenue of ICAN, one of the largest anti-vaccine organizations in the U.S., increased by 60%, to $5.5 million.
In 2020, at the height of the Covid-19 Pandemic, 60% of the U.S. populace distrusted medical scientists.
From 2020 to 2022, the American public’s trust of their state health departments decreased by 19%, from 68% to 55%.
From 2020 to 2022, Americans trust in nonprofits decreased by 3%.
From 2020 to 2021, Americans’ confidence in medical scientists decreased by 28%. In 2022, White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator Dr. Ashish Jha said in comment that it was due to “lack of representation in the scientific field.”
From 2020 to 2021, longevity in the United States decreased by .7%, from 76.98 years to 76.44 years.
From 2020 to 2021, during the barely-covert international release of a Chinese bat virus with four amino acids added for improved transmissibility to humans, longevity in nations outside the U.S. increased by .26%.
The .7% decrease in longevity in the U.S. from 2020 to 2021 was 369% greater than the .26% increase in longevity documented in nations outside the U.S. during that same time period.
Wait, what? The distribution of purportedly protective Covid vaccines was way higher in the U.S. than elsewhere. And, yet, the virus purportedly did exponentially more damage in the U.S., than elsewhere. What gives?
It’s scientific proof that the purportedly-helpful vaccines are in fact driving exponential increases in mortality.
In January 2020, Dr. Charles Lieber, 60, Chair of the Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Harvard University, was arrested and charged with lying to the Department of Defense about secret monthly payments of $50,000.00 paid by China, and receipt of millions more to help set up the chemical/biological “Research” laboratory in Wuhan, China.
In January 2020, Yanqing Ye, 29, a Chinese national, “was charged in an indictment with one count each of visa fraud, making false statements, acting as an agent of a foreign government and conspiracy. Ye is currently in China.”
Can you see how, despite being arrested, he was allowed to walk, and flee the U.S.? How they must laugh.
In February 2020, National Taiwan University professor Fang Chi-Tai said that the Wuhan coronavirus was likely man-made, that COVID-19 is 96 percent similar to the bat virus RaTG13, which is known to be housed at the Wuhan lab. Fang said that a French team investigating COVID-19 had found that the key difference between RaTG13 and COVID-19 was that the latter has four additional amino acids not found in any other coronaviruses. Fang said that these four amino acids make the disease easier to transmit.
In February of 2020, as the coronavirus is spreading around the country, scientists in the U.S. were starting to ask where it was coming from.
On February 1, 2020, 11 scientists got together to talk about the possibility that Covid-19 may have originated from a lab leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and that it might have been due to the manipulation of one of the viruses that they had there.
A number of top scientists who are on this call — Robert Garry, Edward Holmes, Kristian Andersen, Jeremy Farrar — discussed this possibility and recognized that there were real reasons to be concerned. They all knew the nature of the work that was underway at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where of course is where the pandemic began, and that it might have led to the pandemic.
One of the scientists on the call, the Scripps Research Institute’s Mike Farazan, sent an email to Anthony Fauci, Francis Collins, then-head of NIH, and Lawrence Tabak, also of NIH, kind of summarizing the concerns of the scientists.
Bob Garry, a virologist at the Tulane School of Medicine, said “I lined n-CoV” — so, the new coronavirus — “with the 96 percent bat Coronavirus, sequenced at the WIV. Except for the RBD” — and that means receptor-binding domain — “the S proteins are essentially identical at the amino-acid level, while all but the perfect insertion of 12 nucleotides, that adds the furin site, as to is over its whole length, essentially identical. I really can’t think of a plausible natural scenario where you get from the bat virus or one very similar to it to [SARS-CoV-2] where you insert exactly 4 amino acids 12 nucleotide[s] that all have to be added at the exact same time to gain this function….I just can’t figure out how this gets accomplished in nature.”
A number of other scientists on the call said very similar things. Some of them are putting percentages, 70/30 lab, 60/40 lab.
Bob Garry said “The major feedback we got from the Feb 1 teleconference was: 1.Don’t try to write a paper at all — it’s unnecessary or 2. If you do write it don’t mention a lab origin as that will just add fuel to the conspiracists.”
In a tirelessly-utilized technique, the people involved in the conspiracy directed attention outward to only generally-referenced “conspiracists”.
At the time, Bob Redfield, then Director of the CDC, had private communications with Fauci, Jeremy Farrar of Wellcome Trust, and Dr. Tedros of the WHO, and basically said: “We have to take a lab leak possibility with utmost seriousness, we need to look into this”.
Then, just a couple days later, the “proximal origins” letter was released, in which a criminal subset of these very same scientists said that, actually, the lab leak is just a giant conspiracy.
The “proximal origins” letter had five authors. Four of them were in the February 1 meeting. CDC Director Bob Redfield was not included. In it, they wrote that “there is no scenario by which the Coronavirus could have had a lab origin”.
Once that letter got into pre-publication, Fauci is at the White House and asked by a reporter at one of the White House Covid briefings, could this have come from a lab?
He points to the proximal origins letter and says: “There was a study recently that we can make available to you where a group of highly qualified evolutionary biologist looked at the sequences there and the sequences in bats as they evolve, and the mutations that it took to get to the point where it is now is totally consistent with a jump of a species from an animal to a human.”
It was disseminated from the White House podium with no reference to the previous February meeting.
CDC Director Bob Refield felt that the exercise was to come up with a single narrative that they could then communicate. And that strategy was very effective. They did come up with a single narrative, and took the possibility of a lab origin off the table — publicly — for many, many months.
Peter Daszak participated in this effort to organize scientists to push the media away from looking at the lab leak. He drafted a letter to be published in The Lancet, which basically says: We scientists support our colleagues in China — and that is certainly commendable. But then it goes on to say: Anybody who is talking about the possibility of a lab origin is peddling conspiracy theories."
At that same moment, in late February, 2020, there was a whole cache of emails (discovered via the Freedom of Information Act), in which he, Ralph Baric and others were saying:We need to conceal our role in organizing this letter, because it’ll have much more power and authority if our role is concealed". Jeremy Farrar was a co-signatory of that letter, and a number of people who were on that letter — among them Christian Drosten — basically came out later and said: “If I had known all this research that was going on at the WIV, I wouldn’t have signed that letter, because I consider the research that was being done to be quite risky and I didn’t really understand Daszak’s role in all of this.”
Here we see conspirators caught red-handed and disavowing knowledge once the operations’s cover has been blown.
In March 2020, Nature said “But the scientific consensus is clear— humans could not have possibly bio-engineered or mutated a virus to create the novel coronavirus.”
[image]
(Brad Pitt, playing Dr. Anthony Fauci on Saturday Night Live, 2020. As a bonus, he’s making purportedly-secret Illuminist hand gestures which they refer to as “signs of recognition”)
In July 2020, Brad Pitt was nominated for an Emmy for his portrayal of Dr. Fauci on Saturday Night Live.
“I related it more to my upbringing, I grew up in a very Christian environment — a very healthy environment and a loving a family — but there were parameters that I didn’t understand, that I questioned it, and it took me until my adult years until I could really try new things…That was satanism, it works really well,I made a pact and the movie came out,so… No, you’re really dealing with certain things as you grow up and you’ve got to try things on for yourself and really figure out what works for you and what doesn’t. I just relate to that time, it’s a very personal time, it’s a comfort system and you cut the tether and find yourself very on your own with nothing to hold on to.”
- Brad Pitt
From April 2021 to December 2021, the percentage of the U.K. public who distrusted Boris Johnson on the pandemic increased by 100%, or doubled, from 31% to 62%
From April 2020 to December 2021, the percentage of U.S. adults who have not too much trust/no confidence at all in Medical scientists to act in the best interest of the public increased by 100%, or doubled, from 11% to 22%.
From April 2020 to December 2021, the percentage of U.S. adults who have not too much trust/no confidence at all in Scientists to act in the best interest of the public increased by 83%, from 12% to 22%.
From 2021 to 2022, public trust in public health officials, like those at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, decreased by 20% , from 43 percent to 54 percent — much lower than during the early stages of the pandemic.
From 2021 to 2022, Americans’ trust in their government decreased by 13% , from 24 percent to 21 percent.
In 2021, the racial group in the U.S. that experienced the greatest decrease in life expectancy was whites. Kff.org said it was due to “high rates of vaccine hesitancy”.
That is a bald-faced lie, in that, in 2021, the vaccination rate among whites was 19% higher than blacks, and 3.2% higher than hispanics.
Thus, vaccination against Covid-19 is a driver of increased mortality.
Kff.org is using conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty. I have exposed their duplicity by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In 2021, a Pfizer sub-contractor ‘falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events’ while managing three sites of Pfizer’s pivotal Covidvaccine trial.
In the spring of 2021, there was a series of open letters by some very prominent scientists. One of those letters was actually published in Science, the preeminent journal in the fielf. Those letters said that the possibility of a lab origin needed to be taken very seriously, that it had been preemptively dismissed.
In response, the World Health Organization came out with a report on the origins of the coronavirus that described lab origin as “extremely unlikely”. We now know that the WHO’s investigation was extremely limited. They were not given full access to labs and to other areas that they wanted to see.
During this time, a scientist named Dr. Jesse Bloom wrote a paper tracking some of the early SARS-CoV-2 sequences from China. He quickly realized that some of the sequences that were published in Chinese journals had disappeared from the NIH database of sequences. And he was able to determine that the NIH had deleted the sequences at the request of their fellow conspirators in Wuhan.
Bloom sent a copy of the paper it to Fauci and Collins, who invited him onto a call and they tell him he could “bring a second”. For those unaware, that’s dueling parlance.
The conference call included Kristian Andersen and Robert Garry. Bloom invited scientists Rasmus Nielsen, and Sergei Pond. Almost immediately, it devolved into a furious set of accusations with Anderson accusing Bloom of bringing scrutiny to this that will lead to more harassment of scientists. And then Anderson proposes something that just stuns Bloom.
He says: Look, the preprint is not public yet. So I can go in there and basically with no fingerprints, I can either revise it, or delete it. And Bloom is aghast, and he says: I don’t think that that is appropriate, given the circumstances.
Then, preprints of Bloom’s paper came out, revised precisely as Kristian Anderson had said - claiming that Covid-19 was introduced into the wider environment in Wuhan by “some spillover event from an infected animal at this wholesale seafood market”.
When you look at the early case data from Wuhan, for a period the Wuhan CDC was only looking at cases that had a link to the Huanan Seafood Market. So that of course biases them toward cases that have a market connection.
From April 2021 to January 2022, Americans’ trust in National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Director Anthony Fauci decreased by 8%, from 71 percent to 65 percent.
The University of Pennsylvania’s Annenberg Public Policy Center described the see-the-needle-moving decrease lovingly as “statistically meaningful”.
In May 2021, cbc.ca said “British PM Boris Johnson says he doesn’t believe COVID-19 escaped from a lab.”
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
- Joseph Goebbels
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has walked the cold truth of “was deliberately created and released from a lab” back to merely “escaped from a lab” - a ridiculous assertion - as if it had a mind or mobility of its own. The propagandist puts the claptrap forward because they know that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
In the summer of 2021, the EMA, the European Medicines Agency, admitted that they did not know the full composition of the COVID-19 vaccines, and, despite that fact, they authorized them, anyway.
In a New York Times interview, Dr. Anthony Fauci’s admitted that his estimation of what percentage of Americans would need to receive the vaccine to induce herd immunity was not based upon epidemiological reasoning, but rather was chosen with the intention of encouraging vaccination.
Likewise, his suggestion that the U.S. would soon consider vaccine requirements for air travel was, once again, not based on factual data regarding the transmission of the virus on airplanes, but on the notion that making life further inconvenient for the unvaccinated might produce his preferred social outcome.
The first rule of politics is “deny, deny, deny”. That’s why a wgntv.com article from October 2021 is headlined “US intel doesn’t expect to determine origins of COVID-19”.
In August 2021, The Washington Post said “Coronavirus vaccines work. But this statistical illusion makes people think they don’t.”
The article goes on to say “In Israel, nearly 60% of people hospitalized with severe covid-19 were fully vaccinated".
In September 2021, Pfizer made the Brazilian government sign a liability waiver for any possible side-effects of the vaccine, exempting Pfizer from any civil liability for serious side-effects arising from the use of the vaccine, indefinitely.
In October 2021, after achieving 115% vaccine coverage (vaccination was extended to many Spanish visitors), the number of Covid deaths in Gibraltar increased by 1,840%.
Autopsies of people who died shortly after vaccination suggests that 50% of these deaths were caused by the vaccine, which is also believed to be behind an unprecedented accumulation of lymphocytes found in the hearts, kidneys, livers and spleens of the deceased.
In November 2021, Kyle Beattie, a doctoral student in international relations and comparative politics at the University of Alberta, Canada, published a study entitled “Worldwide Bayesian Causal Impact Analysis of Vaccine Administration on Deaths and Cases Associated with COVID-19: A BigData Analysis of 145 Countries”.
https://vector-news.github.io/editorials/CausalAnalysisReport_html.html
He compared data from a control group of four countries with low vaccination rates – Burkina Faso, Chad, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and South Sudan – to others where vaccine rollouts were far more widespread.
His research indicated that the global COVID-19 vaccine rollout had “a strong and significant propensity” to increase deaths and cases of the disease.
89.84% of statistically significant countries showed an increase in total deaths per million associated with COVID-19 due directly to the causal impact of treatment initiation.
86.78% of statistically significant countries showed an increase in total cases per million of COVID-19 due directly to the causal impact of treatment initiation.
On average, vaccination against Covid increased deaths from Covid by 463.13%, and increased cases of Covid by 261% .
As noted by other authors (Pacheco-Barrios et al. 2020Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin, Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas, Stefano Giannoni-Luza, and Felipe Fregni. 2020. “COVID-19 Pandemic and Farr’s Law: A Global Comparison and Prediction of Outbreak Acceleration and Deceleration Rates.” PloS One 15 (9): e0239175. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239175.), many countries that reported high cases and deaths associated with COVID-19 during 2020 and early 2021 showed a standard example of Farr’s Law and/or the Gompertz Function when viewed cumulatively per capita as an inverse Gompertz function (Haynes and Kulkarni 2021Haynes, Kingsley E, and Rajendra Kulkarni. 2021. “Modeling Region Based Regimes for COVID-19 Mitigation: An Inverse Gompertz Approach to Coronavirus Infections in the USA, New York, and New Jersey.” Regional Science Policy & Practice.) or when predicted as a “best straight line” (Levitt, Scaiewicz, and Zonta 2020Levitt, Michael, Andrea Scaiewicz, and Francesco Zonta. 2020. “Predicting the Trajectory of Any Covid19 Epidemic from the Best Straight Line.” medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.26.20140814.). In other words, these countries appeared to have largely achieved natural immunity by late spring of 2021 in the Northern Hemisphere, which is why many of their trend lines go flat for a time.
Unfortunately, once the vaccine administration started for the general population, or shortly thereafter, those trend lines began to increase again in many countries, and unnaturally so in the middle or towards the end of summer in the Northern hemisphere or in countries where previously there had been very few if any cases or deaths. Normally, seasonal die off from pneumonia, influenza, or COVID-19 is in the winter, so this spike that appears in many countries after vaccine administration at this time of the year or in countries with no previous outbreaks is highly suspect as not being a natural trend, but rather vaccine-induced.
As an aside, I would note that, in 2021, more than 90% of COVID-19 patients in intensive care were double and triple vaccinated.
In December 2021, Dr. Charles Lieber, Chair of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Harvard University, was convicted of making false statements, concealing his affiliation with the Wuhan University of Technology and his participation in China’s Thousand Talents Program, and tax offenses.
WUT paid Lieber a salary of up to $50,000 per month, living expenses of up to $150,000 and awarded him more than $1.5 million to establish a research lab at WUT. In 2018 and 2019, Lieber lied to federal authorities about his involvement in the Thousand Talents Plan and his affiliation with Wuhan University of Technology.
Lieber’s research was focused on using nanotechnology to probe the brain toward the future of brain-machine interfaces.
Below is a selected list of Lieber’s publications (title and year) with connection to the brain or central nervous system.
Nanowire probes could drive high-resolution brain-machine interfaces, 2019
Single-cell profiles of retinal ganglion cells differing in resilience to injury reveal neuroprotective genes, 2019
Precision electronic medicine in the brain, 2019
Nano-enabled direct contact interfacing of syringe-injectable mesh electronics, 2019
Scalable ultrasmall three-dimensional nanowire transistor probes for intracellular recording, 2019
Lieber’s work was featured in a Science Daily’s article on the future of mind control. At this writing, Charles Lieber’s Google’s Scholar page points to someone else’s publications.
What was the “brain hacker” doing in Wuhan where he established a secret laboratory? Here’s an excerpt from Dean Koontz’s 1981 novel “The Eyes of Darkness”, which features a weaponized virus named “Wuhan-400”:
“The Chinese tested it on God knows how many political prisoners. They were never able to find an antibody or an antibiotic that was effective against it. The virus migrates to the brain stem, and there it begins secreting a toxin that literally eats away brain tissue like battery acid dissolving cheesecloth.”
The main character of the ‘Eyes of Darkness’, is a young boy named “Danny”, who has psychic powers.
In 1977, Stephen King published “the Shining”. The main Character in “The Shining” is a young boy named “Danny”, who has psychic powers.
The title “the Shining” is an only-general reference to Danny’s psychic powers. The source of the Evil in the novel “the Shining” isn’t the Overlook Hotel, as we are led to believe…rather, it is presumed-victim Danny.
As an aside, I’ll note that “Danny” is an insider-wink reference to the apostate Israelite “Tribe of Dan”, which was one of eleven other “lost tribes” that were, in fact, not “lost”, at all, but rather booted from the known world for their unprepentant human sacrifice, cannibalism and pedophelia. They went on to become what we know as “the Irish” and “the Celts”.
The Covid-19 virus is not about destroying your brain…rather, it is about making you a zombie, about remotely taking control of your brain. Or perhaps simply destroying your innate psychic abilities (see: “Zombie”, previous). Or both.
In January 2022, healthy debate.ca’s Catherine Chambers said “Five reasons why COVID-19 cases are increasing when vaccination rates are going up.”
She’s a bald-fadedly lying Illuminist shill, in that none of the five reasons she provides includes “the vaccines are causing the infection they are falsely claimed to be preventing.”
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those many variants is “stunned”.
That’s why a LeoHohmann.com article from January 2022 says , “Highly-cited COVID doctor comes to stunning conclusion: Gov’t ‘scrubbing unprecedented numbers’ ofinjection-related deaths”.
The first rule of politics is “deny, deny, deny”. That’s why a New York Post article from February 2022 is headlined “CDC withholding COVID data over fears of misinterpretation”.
In February 2022, the CDC withheld data on vaccination status over the last year, along with information on the effectiveness of booster shots on those between 18 and 49. Kristen Nordlund, a CDC spokeswoman, said the reason for the slow release of data is “because basically, at the end of the day, it’s not yet ready for prime time.”
The first rule of politics is “deny, deny, deny”. That’s why an msn.com article by Laura Korpar, from February 2022 explains “Why public health doesn’t disclose vaccination status for COVID deaths”.
On February 27, 2022, the New York Times put this story on their front page: "New Research Points to Wuhan Market as Pandemic Origin.”
The Wuhan lab and the Manhattan non-profit “EcoHealth” were doing work - work funded by U.S. taxpayers - to find viruses and stop them before they become a pandemic.
And then the Covid-19 virus comes about by accident and within walking distance of their lab.
In the future, the general populace at this time will be considered the stupidest in human history, for reasons that include their buying this cover story.
To make the great Confidence game even more spectacular, they’ve gone on to say with straight faces that they need billions more tax dollars for this critical prevention.
To this writing, in 2022, there is an active, ongoing National Institute of Health grant, which describes essentially the same research that was in the first grant. Different partners, WIV is not a partner now, but UNC is a partner and it is ongoing.
But they’re not having it all their own way, by any means. In July 2022, thehill.com said “Fauci to retire before the end of Biden’s term”.
Wait, what? I thought Saint Fauci knew more about fighting evil virii than anyone, and was on the job to protect us, night and day?
The article goes on to say “When asked about the possibility of quitting during an interview last year, Fauci said he would “unequivocally” not quit in response to criticisms of him. “So because there are a lot of people who have ideas about conspiracies and changing minds and flip-flopping, that’s not a reason to step down. Not at all,” he said.”
The article goes on to say “The Hill has removed its comment section, as there are many other forums for readers to participate in the conversation. We invite you to join the discussion on Facebook and Twitter.”
Where “removed its comment section” is Mil-speak for a propaganda terms known as “stonewalling”.
Remember: when Confidence games collapse, they do so in a rush, like a house of cards.
Jeff Miller, Gurnee, IL, August 3, 2022
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
