This is the highest-level data table from my fish records study, which is way too long to post here.
FISH GROWTH RATES ARE INCREASING EXPONENTIALLY, MOVING FORWARD IN TIME
Great positive changes are underway at every level of our reality. They began in earnest in 2012, and have been increasing in speed and magnitude. I began writing this series of articles, entitled “Positive Changes That Are Occurring”, in July of 2013.
These historically-unprecedented positive changes are being driven by many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices based on the work of Wilhelm Reich and Karl Hans Welz.
Since Don Croft first fabricated tactical Orgonite in 2000, its widespread, ongoing and ever-increasing distribution has been unknitting and transforming the ancient Death energy matrix built and expanded by our dark masters, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. And, as a result, the Ether is returning to its natural state of health and vitality.
One of those changes is that fish growth rates are increasing exponentially, moving forward in time. That’s not supposed to be scientifically possible, , as it is asserted that an organism will grow to a maximum possible size based upon its genetic structure. Within this construct, growth rates would get smaller and smaller, going forward in time, and eventually cease increasing at all. That is, of course, presuming no changes in their environment, like being force fed in a tank, or something along those lines.
From 1955 to 2017, the average annual margins between fish records in this study increased by 2,000%, from .3% to 6.3%.
From 1955 to 1981, the average annual margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged, at .3%.
From 1955 to 1956, the margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .3%.
From 1956 to 1957, the margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .3%.
From 1957 to 1958, the margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .3%.
From 1958 to 1959, the margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .3%.
From 1959 to 1960, the margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .3%.
From 1960 to 1961 the margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .3%.
From 1961 to 1962 the margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .3%.
From 1962 to 1963 the margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .3%.
From 1963 to 1964 the margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .3%.
From 1964 to 1965 the average margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .3%.
From 1965 to 1966 the average margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .3%.
From 1966 to 1967 the average margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .3%.
From 1967 to 1968 the average margins between fish records in this study increased by 33.3%, from .3%, to .4%.
From 1968 to 1969 the average margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .4%.
From 1969 to 1970 the average margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .4%.
From 1970 to 1971 the average margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .4%.
From 1971 to 1972 the average margins between fish records in this study decreased by 25%, from .4% to .3%.j
From 1972 to 1973 the average margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .3%.
From 1973 to 1974 the average margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .3%.
From 1974 to 1975 the average margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .3%.
From 1975 to 1976 the average margins between fish records in this study increased by 66.6%, from .3% to .5%.
From 1976 to 1977 the average margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .5%.
From 1977 to 1978 the average margins between fish records in this study decreased by 20%, from .5% to .4%.
From 1978 to 1979 the average margins between fish records in this study increased by 25%, from .4% to .5%.
From 1979 to 1980 the average margins between fish records in this study decreased by 40%, from .5% to .3%.
From 1980 to 1981 the average margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .3%.
From 1981 to 1984, the average margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .4%.
From 1981 to 1982 the average margins between fish records in this study increased by 66.7%, from .3% to .5%.
From 1982 to 1983, the average margins between fish records in this study decreased by 20%, from .5% to .4%.
From 1984 to 1985, the average margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .4%.
From 1984 to 1985, the average margins between fish records in this study increased by 25%, from .4% to .5%.
From 1985 to 1992, the average annual margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .5%.
From 1985 to 1986, the average margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .5%.
From 1986 to 1987, the average margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .5%.
From 1987 to 1988, the average margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .5%.
From 1988 to 1989, the average margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .5%.
From 1989 to 1990, the average margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .5%.
From 1990 to 1991, the average margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .5%.
From 1991 to 1992, the average margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .5%.
To say that the sample sizes are small from to 1992 is an understatement. My surmise is that the rates were basically unchanged. We could call it .5% all the way back, and still have to contend with the sudden, exponential increase in fish growth rates which commenced in the early 1990’s, as the vibrational rate of the Earth began to increase in earnest as it approached the great year of transition of 2012.
Fish records per year is another line of inquiry provided by this data, however I’m not going to get into that now.
From 1992 to 1993, the average margins between fish records in this study increased by 39.9%, from .5% to .7%.
From 1993 to 2017, the average annual margins between fish records in this study increased by 800%, from .7% to 6.3%.
From 1993 to 1994, the average margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .7%
From 1994 to 1995, the average margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at .7%.
From 1995 to 1997, the average margins between fish records in this study increased by 114%, or more than doubled, from .7% to 1.5%.
This sudden, gigantic increase in fish growth rates is the reason that aerosol operations got underway worldwide in 1998. And it’s why the literal forest of what we euphemistically call cell towers was thrown up almost overnight in every nation that same year.
From 1995 to 1996, the average margins between fish records in this study increased by 57.1%, from .7% to 1.1%.
From 1996 to 1997, the average margins between fish records in this study increased by 36.3%, from 1.1% to 1.5%.
In 1997, a friend of mine and I stood on his back porch in our home town of Emmaus, Pennsylvania, and watched a spectacular sunset. We both agreed it was as if a new world was coming into being. I have a picture of it somewhere.
From 1997 to 2000, fish growth rates decreased by 40%, from 1.5% to .9%, withering under the onslaught of purportedly harmless microwave radiation.
From 1997 to 1998, the average margins between fish records in this study decreased by 20%, from 1.5% to 1.2%.
From 1998 to 1999, the average margins between fish records in this study remained unchanged at 1.2%.
From 1999 to 2000, the average margins between fish records in this study decreased by 25%, from 1.2% to .9%.
In 2000, Don Croft invented Orgonite, based upon previous work by Karl Hans Welz and Wilhelm Reich. It’s a device that contains a crystal in a matrix of organic and inorganic materials, typically polyester resin and scrap metal of some kind. Orgonite continuously transmutes what Reich respectively called “Dead Orgone Radiation” into “Positive Orgone Radiation”.
These simple, inexpensive devices immediately began to break the back of the gigantic Death energy network patiently built and expanded by our dark masters all the way back to Babylon, and before.
From 2000 to 2001, the average margins between fish records in this study increased by 11.1%, from .9% to 1%.
From 2001 to 2002, the average margins between fish records in this study decreased by 9.9%, from 1% to .9%.
From 2002 to 2003, the average margins between fish records in this study increased by 11.1%, from .9% to 1%
From 2003 to 2004, the average margins between fish records in this study increased by 140%, or well more than doubled, from 1% to 2.4%.
I began gifting in 2003.
From 2004 to 2005, the average margins between fish records in this study increased by 25%, from 2.4% to 3%.
From 2005 to 2006, the average margins between fish records in this study decreased by 26.6%, from 3% to 2.2%.
From 2006 to 2007, the average margins between fish records in this study decreased by 40.9%, from 2.2% to 1.3%.
From 2007 to 2008, the average margins between fish records in this study decreased by 7.7%, from 1.3% to 1.2%.
From 2008 to 2009, the average margins between fish records in this study increased by 58.3%, from 1.2% to 1.9%.
From 2009 to 2010, the average margins between fish records in this study decreased by 5.3%, from 1.9% to 1.8%.
From 2010 to 2011, the average margins between fish records in this study increased by 27.8%, from 1.8% to 2.3%.
From 2011 to 2012, the average margins between fish records in this study increased by 17.4%, from 2.3% to 2.7%.
From 2012 to 2013, the average margins between fish records in this study decreased by 18.5%, from 2.7% to 2.2%.
From 2013 to 2014, the average margins between fish records in this study increased by 49.9%, from 2.2% to 3.2%.
From 2014 to 2015, the average increase in size of fish in this study increased by 21.9%, from 3.2% to 3.9%.
From 2015 to 2016, the average margin between fish records in this study increased by 5.1%, from 3.9% to 4.1%.
From 2016 to 2017, the average margins between the fish records in this study increased by 53.7%, from 4.1% to 6.3%.
From 2017 to 2018, the average margins between fish records in this study decreased by 38%, from 6.3% to 3.9%.
From 2018 to 2019, the average margins between fish records in this study decreased by 43.6%, from 3.9% to 2.2%.
From 2019 to 2020 the average margins between fish records in this study increased by 27%, from 2.2% to 2.8%.
Please e-mail me at [email protected] if you’d like to have a copy of the study. It’s too long to post here.
