“The opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.”
From “The Art of War”, by Sun Tzu, 5th Century B.C.
In July 2023, the bluefin tuna winked into existence in the Salish Sea, after never having been documented there, previously. It weighed 250 pounds.
Here’s a picture of it.
(Gary Lundquist with Bluefin tuna, Salish Sea, June 2023)
In the photo immediately above, take note of Gary’s Satanic green jacket, and how the image is constructed to focus attention on his left eye.
All of the stories say that it was “lost”, and that it “beached itself”, yet it is facing sideways, and is way in from the water.
Neither king5.com’s Erica Zucco, SeaDoc Society wildlife veterinarian Joe Gaydos nor Florida University’s Dr. Karly Cohen were able to provided a weight for the only example of the bluefin tuna ever documented in the Salish Sea.
That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
On July 12, 2023, king5.com said “Pacific bluefin tuna found washed up on Orcas Island”.
Where, under the false guise of familiarity, author Erica Zucco omitted “the Salish Sea”, to make the subject almost unsearchable.
That is an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The article goes on to say “When SeaDoc Society wildlife veterinarian Joe Gaydos first got a call about a Pacific bluefin tuna spotted at Crescent Beach on Orcas Island, his initial reaction was awe”.
It wasn’t “spotted”, it was found…it was discovered.
Erica used “spotted” to reinforce the false meme that the bluefin tuna had been out there in the Salish Sea all along, only nobody had looked for it with the proper skill or assiduousness, previously.
SeaDoc Society wildlife veterinarian Joe Gaydos use of “awe” is an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
awe - noun - awe dates back to Middle English, and was borrowed from Old Norse, a Scandinavian language. In Middle English the word referred to intense fear.
The article goes on to say:
“Sure enough, this giant tuna was sitting on the beach and it was so beautiful- with the sun coming up and the tuna sitting there, I was like, ‘This is kind of surreal, what’s going on?’" Gaydos said. “Just that morning there was a book being released, ‘Fishes of the Salish Sea,’ all 260 fishes- I thought, I don’t think that fish is even in here.”
Where, magnificently, SeaDoc Society wildlife veterinarian Joe Gados walks “bluefin tuna” back to “giant tuna”, and then walks it back again to “the tuna”, and then walks it back yet again to “that fish”.
Joe’s use of “surreal” and “what’s going on” and “I don’t think” are all examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
It creates the general impression of a weed-smoking wildlife veterinarian, whom the Coincidence theorist reader will reject out-of-hand as a witness.
Is the bluefin tuna listed among the 260 species of fish listed in “Fishes of the Salish Sea”, or is it not?
Well, it is tough to get good marine veterinary help, these days.
For those unaware, anytime someone says “sure enough”, they are lying.
Here, the bald-facedly lying marine veterinarian says, with a straight face, that the 250 pound bluefin tuna was “sitting on the beach”, “sitting there”, without a scratch on it.
Has anyone ever, in history, encountered a beached bluefin tuna? A dead tuna so fresh that it was still warm? Sorry, folks, but generational Satanist Freemason wildlife veterinarian Joe Gados is lying bald-facedly in a mainstream publication.
Here’s Joe Gados’ picture, where he’s got his head pointedly turned to accentuate his left eye, like in a Russian poster of Vladimir Lenin.
(Marine veterinarian Joe Gados, who said that the 250 pound bluefin tuna was “sitting on the beach”, “sitting there”, without a scratch on it, and that it was still warm. Yet Joe also said that he “got a call”, and then headed over to where the tuna was. How long do you think it takes a dead fish that’s just come out of the cold water to get cold in the Pacific Northwest?)
Now here’s a Russian poster of Vladimir Lenin, where he’s got his head pointedly turned to accentuate his left eye.
(Vladimir Lenin)
The article goes on to say “He called researchers at the University of Washington’s Friday Harbor Laboratories, who were also surprised to see the species so far north.”
Where “surprised” is an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
The article goes on to say “He sent us a photo of this bluefin and we were all incredibly enthusiastic about it,” Dr. Karly Cohen of the University of Florida said. “I’ve never seen a bluefin tuna up close and personal like that so it was really just a mindblowing experience and it felt unreal even as we were pulling up to the dock to this massive fish that had been placed on a gurney for us to put on a research vessel.”
Where the University of Florida’s Dr. Karly Cohen walked the specific “bluefin tuna” back to the general “massive fish”.
She’s shaking the doll of it being “massive”, and carefully not making mentioning the fact that it is the first example of this species in this ecosystem in history.
As a propagandist, she knows that the key to any successful Confidence game is misdirection.
Karly’s use of the fantastically-unscientific “incredibly enthusiastic”, “mindblowing” and “unreal” are all examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
This strong odor of ignorance will lead the Coincidence theorist reader to reject her out of hand as a witness.
The article goes on to say “NOAA says in the United States, the fish are mostly found within 100 nautical miles of the California coast. Dr. Cohen says while there are some records of bluefin bones washed up in British Columbia, this is an unusual event.”
Where “unusual event” positions it as a one-off, and where “unusual” is an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
Dr. Cohen’s general claim “there are some records of bluefin bones washed up in British Columbia” is brazenly false, given that it is unsubstantiated, hearsay.
The article goes on to say “These are temperate species, they don’t like our cold waters- so it’s quite bizarre and rare that it showed up here," Dr. Cohen said.”
Where the University of Florida’s Dr. Karly Cohen successively walked the specific “bluefin tuna” back to the general “these” and “species” and “they”.
Her statements that bluefin tuna is a “temperate species”, and that “they don’t like cold waters” are both brazenly false.
A current article on montereybayaquarium.org states “The bluefin tuna is known to dive to chilly depths of 1800 feet (550 meters) and navigate through icy northern waters during their migrations. Unlike most fish, a bluefin tuna’s blood temperature can be warmer than the water around it.”
I’ll add that the largest bluefin tuna in history was caught in the icy waters off Nova Scotia.
Dr. Cohen’s statement that the bluefin tuna corpse on the beach in the Salish Sea is “rare” is also false, given that no other example of the species has ever been documented there.
Her once-again fantastically-unscientific use of “bizarre” is an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
It was carefully put there by Dr. Cohen herself to suggest to the Coincidence theorist reader that her own testimony be rejected, as well.
I have exposed the duplicity of Dr. Karly Cohen, marine Veterinarian Joe Gaydos and king5.com’s Erica Zucco by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
Here’s Dr. Karly Cohen’s picture, where she has pointedly turned her head to accentuate her left eye.
(The University of Florida’s Dr. Karly E. Cohen, who studies fish for a living, who said “These are temperate species, they don’t like our cold waters”. When, in fact, tuna are a cold water fish.)
Here’s Erica Zucco’s picture, in a Satanic green dress, and where she has pointedly turned her head to accentuate her left eye.
(King5 News’ Erica Zucco, who was unable to provide a weight for the only example of the bluefin tuna ever documented in the Salish Sea.)
On October 5, 2023, nwsportsmanmag.com questioned “Mystery Solved? Podcast Offers More Details About Orcas Island Bluefin Tuna”.
Where “mystery” and the question mark are examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
With this headline, Newport Sportsman Magazine author Andy Walgamott has let us know that he’s going to tell us What To Think.
The article goes on to say “While the Lundquists had a ferry to catch that morning and didn’t bother cutting off any of the meat, another local man did, and it led to social media assumptions about what the impact would be to his digestive system.
Where “another local man” is general. This is a news story. The fact that his name is not used means either that he is being protected by his fellow generational Satanist Freemasons, or he is an invention of the generational Satanist Freemason author.
Here’s Andy Walgamott’s picture, with a Satanic green “Tree of Life” background, where the image is constructed to focus on his left eye, and where he is making a purportedly-secret Masonic “gesture of recognition” .
(Newport Sportsman Magazine’s Andy Walgamott, who said that the “mystery” of the bluefin tuna winking into existence in the Salish Sea was “solved”.)
The article goes on to say “We subsequently learned the guy was just fine, in fact the flesh was just fine,” Adam Summers, a University of Washington professor based at Friday Harbor Labs who dissected the bluefin, told Cox.
Where “the guy” is once again general.
The article goes on to say “Summers also tried some himself after receiving advice from a tuna expert NOT to just discard its flesh. “It was fabulous, fabulous meat. It did not go to waste,” he said.
People like Adam who study fish for a living know what good fish looks and tastes like, and they also know what bad fish looks and tastes like. And people who don’t know anything at all about fish also know those same things. This gymnastic excuse about the unnamed person who also had “some” tuna, and the drama about the fish professor who works at a fish lab who for some insane reason has to check with a specialist to see if he can eat the tuna.
It’s just that they lie so pathologically that it gets bad like this, ofttimes.
“In the podcast, Summers described boating from Orcas back over to San Juan Island with the wrapped-up carcass and realizing just how fresh the fish really was.”
As if the fish professor who works in a fish lab did not know that when he touched the skin of the fish for the first time, and glanced at its clear eyes. This sentence covers up the generational Satanist Freemason fish professor who works at the fish lab who killed the fish and chowed down on it as he drove the boat back to the lab.
The article goes on to say “It started bleeding and it was absolutely fresh arterial-red blood,” Summers said. “It was a typical experience when you just boated a tuna and you see this blood coming out. I knew that we weren’t going to be opening up a four- or five-day-old animal.”
Wait, “it started bleeding”, what?
Why did it just “start bleeding”? Either from the wounds that unnamed generational Satanist Freemason A inflicted prior to depositing it on the beach, or, obviously, B, the fish professor who works in a fish lab who killed the fish and took it back to the lab, and ate some of it in the boat on the way back to the lab.
Here’s a picture of Marine Biologist Adam Summers, where he has pointedly turned his head to accentuate his left eye.
(Adam Summers, who works at a marine biology lab, who said that he did not think to eat any of the bluefin tuna found in the Salish Sea until “receiving advice from a tuna expert NOT to just discard its flesh.” Did you notice how the “tuna expert” is unnamed? It is a cloud of bullshit, blown to keep you from recognizing that Adam killed the tuna and immediately chowed down on it.)
Here’s another picture of Adam, where the image is constructed to focus attention on his left eye, and where he’s making two different Masonic “gestures of recognition”.
(Adam Summers)
The article goes on to say:
“When I cut into it,” Josh Brown, the man who expertly trimmed off a fillet that July morning on the beach, told Cox over sushi from the fish and beers, “it was still warm. They’re warm-blooded fish.”
Josh Brown, wait, what? Why wasn’t Josh named earlier? And why, and when, was he hanging out with Cox?
Why did King5 News’ Erica Zucco initially not name Josh Brown? And why, when she did eventually mention him, did she simply call him “the man”? The man who, incidentally, “expertly trimmed off a fillet”.
She’s trying to cover up what is obviously an Operation, an Op, comprised of multiple co-conspirators. One of which is NOAA Sea Grant’s Josh Brown.
Here’s a picture of NOAA Sea Grant’s Joshua Brown, in a Satanic purple shirt, with a Satanic green “Tree of Life” background, and where the image is constructed to focus attention on his left eye.
(NOAA Sea Grant’s Josh Brown)
How long do you think it takes a fish in the Pacific Northwest’s Salish Sea to get cold, once it’s dead?
Have you ever heard of a tuna beaching itself, ever, in history?
I am sorry to be the one to break it to you, but there is foul play involved, here.
The article goes on to say “Summers said that a bluefin expert told him the tuna looked like an “8-year-old fish” that had been on the eastern side of the Pacific for “quite a while” and would have otherwise headed back towards Japan.”
Can you see how “a bluefin expert” is general?
The article goes on to say “As for why it ended up on Orcas, Summers said that bluefin around the world occasionally end up trapped in straits and die there.”
It was happily swimming in the Salish Sea, where it had just winked into existence, when it was hooked by the University of Washington’s Adam Summers, who deposited it “on” Orcas.
Bluefin tuna just dying of starvation or exhaustion, around the world…sorry, that’s just a gigantic, bald-faced lie.
And the lies just keep coming.
“Bluefin are not wired to understand about tides; they’re not really even wired to understand about shoreline,” Summers told Cox. “At this point in their life, they’re traveling in small schools, four to six or eight animals, and the whole school may have ended up in the Salish Sea.”
Fast swimmers, it could have taken a school just a few hours to find themselves deep inside the Strait of Juan de Fuca, where tides, freshwater influences and other factors would have likely further disoriented them, he said.
When the fish was found, a few wags asserted the high-value tuna had been left on the beach as a prank or something, but the podcast suggests otherwise.”
This is a deft technique, if the audience you are preying upon has a grade school education. The general “a few wags” put forward a ridiculous assertion, and then the herd is guided to the wise pronouncements of Joe Gados, who tells them What To Think in his podcast.
The article goes on to say “Eventually, what we determined from particles – gravel and sand in the gills and in the mouth – eventually just making a bad choice about where to be in East Sound as the tide dropped,” Summers told Cox. “And so it beached itself, basically.”
For those unaware, anytime someone says “basically”, they are lying.
Only in America can a marine veterinarian say “we determined from particles” and be believed.
The article goes on to say “The fish was in perfect condition. There were no bruises, there were no issues with the internal organs, but the gills were full of sand and gravel. And the very, very fresh blood convinces us that this animal died just before the tide started dropping.”
That matches the conclusion Washington Coast tuna skipper Mark Coleman reached independently in July. “After a lot of consideration I think it was a lost, cold tuna that died right at the reach of tide,” he told me then.
As I detailed before, there is evidence of bluefin visiting the Pacific Northwest’s outer coast over the millennia in the form of native oral histories and middens, but as Summers pointed out in the podcast, there is none of either for our inside waters.”
Where tuna “skipper” Mark Coleman piled on with “after a lot of consideration”, and then said that the cold-water bluefin tuna was “cold”.
The plausible deniability excuses don’t have to be logical, or reasonable, or even factual.
The propagandist knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
Here’s Mark Coleman’s picture, where the image is constructed to focus attention on his left eye, and where he is pointedly holding the fish in his left hand.
(Mark Coleman, who said “After a lot of consideration I think it was a lost, cold tuna that died right at the reach of tide”. When, in fact, the tuna is a cold water fish, and the tuna was still warm when Josh Brown and Friday Harbor Labs’ Professor Adam Summers started cutting it up.)
On October 16, 2023, komonews published a story on youtube headlined “Mysterious 250 pound tuna found in Salish Sea. No one knew how it got there.”
Where the uncredited author walked the specific bluefin tuna back to the general “tuna”.
That is an example of the the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
For those unaware, anytime an author is uncredited, it is proof that said author is an Intelligence operative.
The uncredited Intelligence operative from KOMO News used “mysterious” and “no one knew how it got there” in successive examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
Professor Adam Summers and NOAA’s Joshua Brown killing (and eating!) the bluefin tuna is part of a modus operandi that is on display numerous times in my article on the etheric origin of species.
One very good example is found in a gizmodo.com article by Tom McKay from September 20, 2017, headlined “Jerk Humans Immediately Shoot First Wild Bison Seen in Germany for Over 250 Years”.
Where “jerk humans” is a general meme used to cover the specific “generational Satanist Freemasons”.
To get out of this situation we’re obviously going to need to make some changes.
The images in this article are all focused on the left eye because, to generational Satanist Freemasons, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or the “eye of Horus”.
But don’t take my word for it:
‘The right eye is the Eye of Ra and the left is the Eye of Horus’.”
From “Freemasonry - Religion And Belief - The 3rd Temple”
Facebook: “Welcome to the Left-Hand-Path-Network, where Satanism is not about worship, but it’s study.”
I have included their pictures so that you could get a better idea of what generational Satanist Freemasons of marginal influence look like.
They figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.
It’s not like these people aren’t right up front about what they’re doing, and what they’re into. We’ve just been conditioned, over literally Millennia, not to “notice” it.
Generational Satanists are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth.
It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
How long do you think that these people have left in power, now?
Please consider doing what you can to help speed the transition.
Jeff Miller, Honolulu, HI, August 14, 2024
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, please send me a note at [email protected].
