“In politics, all abstract terms conceal treachery.”
From “The Black Jacobins”, by C.L.R. James, 1938
THE DATA
In 2011, Harvard University’s Chair of Chemistry and Microbiology, Dr. Charles Lieber was recruited and employed by the Chinese at a salary of $50,000 per month to “conduct scientific research, publish articles in the name of Wuhan University, and recruit top international scientists to work for them as “visiting scholars”. This while he was still working at Harvard and receiving millions of dollars in taxpayer funded grants for his research there.
Lieber even went as far as signing a five-year agreement to set up a joint nanoscience research lab between Wuhan University and Harvard—without Harvard’s knowledge or consent. And when Harvard finally confronted him about it— he lied to them.
When he got caught, he said he was “helping them develop electric car batteries”.
In 2011, Francis Collins, then director of the National Institute of Health and Dr. Anthony Fauci wrote in the Washington Post “Important information and insights can come from generating a potentially dangerous virus in the laboratory.”
In 2014, theNIH’s Collins awarded a $3.7 million grant to the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China and a non-profit in New York City with the Orwellian name of “the EcoHealth Alliance of New York”. The grant was called “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence.”
In 2014, Francis Collins, then director of the National Institute of Health, and Dr. Anthony Fauci began supporting a program of manipulating SARS-related viruses in Wuhan. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth, managed the program, using $3.7 million in NIH money to fund Shi Zhengli, the chief expert on coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Shi collected many types of coronaviruses from wild bats and took them back to her lab. There she manipulated the viruses to make them capable of attacking humans, principally by taking the gene for the spike protein of one virus and inserting it into the genome of another.
She tested the novel viruses in humanized mice—animals genetically engineered to carry in their airways the proteins that the virus targets. The process adapts the virus to be capable of attacking live humans.
You’ve been conditioned to think that this is what an evil scientist looks like:
(Charles Wiseman as Dr. Julius No, from the film “Dr. No”, 1962. Note Chinese henchman)
While this is, in fact, what an actual evil scientist actually looks like:
(Shi Zhengli, the chief expert on coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.)
The resemblance is pretty close. Except that Zhengli is twisting her evil face into something that’s trying to approximate a smile.
I’ve included her photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of significant influence looks like.
They’re all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth.
It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
“Coronaviruses can be artificially manipulated into an emerging human disease virus, then weaponized and unleashed in a way never seen before. These engineered viruses will lead to a new era of genetic weapons and can be used to cause the enemy’s medical system to collapse.”
From “The Unnatural Origin of SARS and New Species of Man-Made Viruses as Genetic Bioweapons”, by 18 Chinese military scientists and weapons experts, 2015
In June 2015, smithsonianmag.com’s Devin Powell said “A Flexible Circuit Has Been Injected Into Living Brains”.
The articIe goes on to say “Tested on mice, the rolled mesh fits inside a syringe and unfurls to monitor brain activity”.
Ah, it unfurls, like a blood-red Communist Chinese flag. My heart swells.
It’s injectable. It fits inside a syringe. You know, the kind used to deliver vaccines? Now, that’s the kind of knowledge you pay fifty grand a month for.
With “monitor brain activity”, Author Devin Powell used what is a half-truth to play the cruel ruse that it was injected in there merely to monitor brain activity, versus the truth: that it was placed in their to control it.
In September 2019, a Harvard Magazine article which features Dr. Lieber was forthcomingly-entitled “The future of mind control”.
In May 2021, MIT’s Rudolf Jaenisch, PhD, and Richard Young, PhD, both members of the National Academy of Sciences, found that the SARS-CoV-2 virus mRNA can be converted to DNA and integrated into the human genome.
From June 2021 to July 2024, Americans who believed it was untrue that COVID-19 vaccines had caused thousands of deaths decreased by 16.6%, from 66% to 55%.
Despite being a scientist by trade, the University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS omitted the percentage, described it only-generally as “fell”, and offered no suggestion as to why the very large decease had taken pace.
Those are examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
When, in fact, in November 2021, a BigData analysis of 145 countries by Kyle Beattie of the University of Alberta showed that showed that vaccination against Covid-19 increased deaths from the engineered virus by 463.13%, and increased cases by an average of 261%.
I have exposed the duplicity of Mary Van Beusekom, MS and the University of Minnesota by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
From June 2021 to July 2024, Americans who believed that COVID-19 vaccines had caused thousands of deaths increased by 27.3%, by almost one third, from 22% to 28%.
Despite being a scientist by trade, the University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS described it only-generally as “up”, said that it was a “untrue”, and offered no suggestion as to why the very large increase had taken pace.
Those are examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
When, in fact, in 2022, Covid deaths among the vaccinated in England were 81% greater, or almost two times greater than they were among the unvaccinated.
Further, in 2021, a BigData analysis of 145 countries showed that vaccination against Covid-19 increased deaths from the engineered virus by 463.13%, and increased cases by an average of 261%
I have exposed the duplicity of Mary Van Beusekom, MS and the University of Minnesota by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
From June 2021 to July 2024, Americans who believed that COVID-19 vaccines change human DNA increased by 87.5%, or by almost two times, from 8% to 15%.
Despite being a scientist by trade, the University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS omitted the percentage, described it, only-generally as “nearly double”, said that they were “mistaken”, without providing any reason as to why, and offered no suggestion as to why the quantum increase had taken place.
Those are all examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
When, in fact, in March 2023, a study in the jounal Nature Microbiology by researchers at UTHealth Houston showed that SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, triggers structural changes in the host cell’s DNA.
I have exposed the duplicity of Mary Van Beusekom, MS and the University of Minnesota by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
From June 2021 to July 2024, Americans who believed that it was less risky to get infected with COVID-19 than to get the vaccine increased by 120%, by more than two times, from 10% to 22%.
Despite being a scientist by trade, the University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS omitted the percentage, described it only-generally as “more than double”, said that it was a “falsity”, and offered no suggestion as to why the quantum increase had taken pace.
Those are examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
When, in fact, in 2021, a German study examining the autopsies of people who died shortly after vaccination suggests that 50% of these deaths were caused by the vaccine, which is also believed to be behind an unprecedented accumulation of lymphocytes found in the hearts, kidneys, livers and spleens of the deceased.
Further, from April 1, 2022 to May 31, 2022, the 1.22% Covid deaths-per-case ratio in England among those vaccinated against Covid was 197% greater, or three times greater than the .41% Covid deaths-per-case ratio among those not vaccinated against Covid.
I have once again exposed the duplicity of Mary Van Beusekom, MS and the University of Minnesota by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In June 2021, 8% of Americans believed that COVID-19 vaccines change human DNA.
The University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS said, only-generally, that they were “mistaken”, without providing any reason as to why.
When, in fact, in March 2023, a study in the jounal Nature Microbiology by researchers at UTHealth Houston showed that SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, triggers structural changes in the host cell’s DNA.
I have exposed the duplicity of Mary Van Beusekom, MS and the University of Minnesota by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In June 2021, in the months following the 2021 vaccine rollout, 10% of Americans believed that it was less risky to get infected with COVID-19 than to get the vaccine.
In June 2021, in the months following the 2021 vaccine rollout, 22% of survey respondents believed that COVID-19 vaccines had caused thousands of deaths.
In June 2021, in the months following the 2021 vaccine rollout, 66% of survey respondents believed it was untrue that COVID-19 vaccines had caused thousands of deaths.
In November 2021, a BigData analysis of 145 countries by Kyle Beattie of the University of Alberta showed that vaccination against Covid-19 increased deaths from the engineered virus by 463.13%, and increased cases by an average of 261%.
From December 2022 to January 2024, flu vaccine uptake in the United States deceased by 6%, rom 50% to 47%.
Despite being a scientist by trade, the University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS omitted the percentage, described it only-generally as “down”, and offered no suggestion as to why the large and sudden decease had taken pace.
Those are examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
In December 2022, CDC data showed flu vaccine uptake was 50%.
From January 2023 to February 2024, Americans who did not receive a seasonal flu shot increased by 10%, from 50% to 55%.
Despite being a scientist by trade, the University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS omitted the percentage entirely.
That is an example of the scientific fraud technique known as “cherrypicking”.From January 2023 to February 2024, Americans who received a seasonal flu shot decreased by 10%, from 50% to 45%.
Despite being a scientist by trade, the University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS omitted the percentage, described it only-generally as “down”, and offered no suggestion as to why the large and sudden decease had taken pace.
Those are examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
In January 2023, 50%, or half of Americans received a seasonal flu shot.
In January 2023, 50%, or half of Americans did not receive a seasonal flu shot.
Despite being a scientist by trade, the University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS omitted the percentage entirely.
That is an example of the scientific fraud technique known as “cherrypicking”.
From June 2023 to July 2024, Americans who were somewhat or very worried that they or a family member would contract COVID-19 decreased by 60%, or by almost two thirds, from 50% to 20%.
Despite being a scientist by trade, the University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS omitted the percentage, described it only-generally as “down”, and “ few remain concerned about infection”, and offered no suggestion as to why the large and sudden decrease had taken pace.
Those are examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
From June 2023 to July 2024, Americans who were not worried that they or a family member would contract COVID-19 increased by 60%, or by almost two thirds, from 50% to 80%.
Despite being a scientist by trade, the University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS omitted the percentage entirely.
That is an example of the scientific fraud technique known as “cherrypicking”.
I have exposed the duplicity of Mary Van Beusekom, MS and the University of Minnesota by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
From June 2023 to February 2024, Americans who were “somewhat likely” or “very likely” to get a yearly COVID-19 vaccine if the CDC recommended it decreased by 15%, from 52% to 44%.
Despite being a scientist by trade, the University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS omitted the percentage, described it only-generally as “a drop”, and offered no suggestion as to why the large and sudden decease had taken pace.
Those are examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
From June 2023 to February 2024, Americans who were not likely to get a yearly COVID-19 vaccine if the CDC recommended it increased by 15%, from 48% to 56%.
Despite being a scientist by trade, the University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS omitted the percentage entirely.
That is an example of the scientific fraud technique known as “cherrypicking”.
I have exposed the duplicity of Mary Van Beusekom, MS and the University of Minnesota by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In June 2023, 48%, or nearly half of Americans were not likely to get a yearly COVID-19 vaccine if the CDC recommended it.
Despite being a scientist by trade, the University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS omitted the percentage entirely.
That is an example of the scientific fraud technique known as “cherrypicking”.
I have exposed the duplicity of Mary Van Beusekom, MS and the University of Minnesota by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In June 2023, 50% of Americans were somewhat or very worried that they or a family member would contract COVID-19.
In June 2023, 50% of Americans were not worried that they or a family member would contract COVID-19.
Despite being a scientist by trade, the University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS omitted the percentage entirely.
That is an example of the scientific fraud technique known as “cherrypicking”.
In June 2023, 52%, or more than half of Americans were “somewhat likely” or “very likely” to get a yearly COVID-19 vaccine if the CDC recommended it.
June 3, 2023, the National Institute health’s Inderbir S. Padda and Mayur Parmar said “the preferred vaccine for booster dosing is a bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, which contains the original SARS-CoV-2 strain (in the monovalent BNT16b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines) and the SAR-CoV-2 Omicron BA.”
We learned previously that, in March 2023, a study in the journal Nature Microbiology by researchers at UTHealth Houston showed that SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, triggers structural changes in the host cell’s DNA.
If the COVID-19 vaccine contains the original SARS-CoV-2 strain, and the SARS-CoV-2 virus triggers structural changes in the host cell’s DNA, then the COVID-19 vaccine triggers structural changes in the host cell’s DNA.
From August 2023 to February 2024, Americans who said they would likely recommend that an older family member or friend discuss the RSV vaccine with their clinician decreased by 9%, from 61% to 55%.
Despite being a scientist by trade, the University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS omitted the percentage, described it only-generally as “a decrease”, and offered no suggestion as to why the large and sudden decease had taken pace.
Those are examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
In August 2023, 39% of Americans said they would not recommend that an older family member or friend discuss the RSV vaccine with their clinician.
Despite being a scientist by trade, the University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS omitted the percentage entirely.
That is an example of the scientific fraud technique known as “cherrypicking”.
In August 2023, 61% of Americans said they would likely recommend that an older family member or friend discuss the RSV vaccine with their clinician.
From October 2023 to July 2024, Americans who were somewhat or very worried that they or a family member would contract COVID-19 decreased by 43%, or by almost half, from 35% to 20%.
Despite being a scientist by trade, the University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS omitted the percentage, described it only-generally as “down”, and “ few remain concerned about infection”, and offered no suggestion as to why the large and sudden decrease had taken pace.
Those are examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
I have exposed the duplicity of Mary Van Beusekom, MS and the University of Minnesota by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
From October 2023 to February 2024, Americans who were somewhat or very worried that they or a family member would contract COVID-19 decreased by 29%, or by almost one third, from 35% to 25%.
Despite being a scientist by trade, the University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS omitted the percentage, described it only-generally as “down”, and offered no suggestion as to why the large and sudden decease had taken pace.
Those are examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
In October 2023, 35% of Americans were somewhat or very worried that they or a family member would contract COVID-19.
In October 2023, 65%, or a near supermajority of Americans were not worried that they or a family member would contract COVID-19.
Despite being a scientist by trade, the University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS omitted the percentage entirely.
That is an example of the scientific fraud technique known as “cherrypicking”.
In July 2024, 22% of Americans believed that it’s less risky to get infected with COVID-19 than to get the vaccine.
In July 2024, 28% of Americans believed that COVID-19 vaccines have caused thousands of deaths.
In July 2024, 45%, or nearly half of Americans believed that COVID-19 vaccines had caused thousands of deaths.
Despite being a scientist by trade, the University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS omitted the percentage entirely.
That is an example of the scientific fraud technique known as “cherrypicking”.
In July 2024, 55%, or more than half of Americans believed it was untrue that COVID-19 vaccines had caused thousands of deaths.
In January 2024, CDC data showed flu vaccine uptake was 47%.
In January 2024, 53%, or more than half of Americans refused the flu vaccine.
Despite being a scientist by trade, the University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS omitted the percentage entirely.
That is an example of the scientific fraud technique known as “cherrypicking”.
In July 2024, 15% of Americans believed that COVID-19 vaccines change human DNA.
The University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS said, only-generally, that they were “mistaken”, without providing any reason as to why.
We learned previously that, in May 2021, a study from MIT found that the SARS-CoV-2 virus mRNA can be converted to DNA and integrated into the human genome, and, further, a study rom Lund University in Sweden in February 2022 found that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine mRNA could be converted to DNA.
Further still, a study in the journal Nature Microbiology in March 2023 by researchers at UTHealth Houston showed that SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, triggers structural changes in the host cell’s DNA.
I have exposed the duplicity of Mary Van Beusekom, MS and the University of Minnesota by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
From February 2024 to July 2024, Americans who were somewhat or very worried that they or a family member would contract COVID-19 decreased by 20%, from 25% to 20%.
Despite being a scientist by trade, the University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS omitted the percentage, described it only-generally as “down”, and offered no suggestion as to why the large and sudden decrease had taken pace.
Those are examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
In February 2024, 19% of Americans did not trust the shingles vaccine.
The University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS described it as “doubting”, and offered no suggestion as to why.
Those are examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
In February 2024, 23% of Americans did not trust the pneumonia vaccine.
The University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS described it as “uncertain about”, and offered no suggestion as to why.
Those are examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
In February 2024, 25% of Americans were somewhat or very worried that they or a family member would contract COVID-19.
In February 2024, 32% of Americans did not trust the the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine aimed at young people.
The University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS described it as “unsure of the effectiveness”, and offered no suggestion as to why.
Those are examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
In February 2024, 37% of Americans did not trust the RSV vaccine at age 60 and older.
The University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS described it as “unsure about”, and offered no suggestion as to why.
Those are examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
In February 2024, 44%, or nearly half of Americans were “somewhat likely” or “very likely” to get a yearly COVID-19 vaccine if the CDC recommended it.
In February 2024, 45%, or less than half of Americans received a seasonal flu shot.
In February 2024, 45%, or nearly half of Americans said they would not recommend that an older family member or friend discuss the RSV vaccine with their clinician.
Despite being a scientist by trade, the University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS omitted the percentage entirely.
That is an example of the scientific fraud technique known as “cherrypicking”.
In February 2024, 47% of Americans did not trust the RSV vaccine during pregnancy.
The University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS described it as “unsure about”, and offered no suggestion as to why.
Those are examples of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
In February 2024, 55% of Americans said they would likely recommend that an older family member or friend discuss the RSV vaccine with their clinician.
In February 2024, 55%, or more than half of Americans did not receive a seasonal flu shot.
Despite being a scientist by trade, the University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS omitted the percentage entirely.
That is an example of the scientific fraud technique known as “cherrypicking”.
In February 2024, 56%, or more than half of Americans were not likely to get a yearly COVID-19 vaccine if the CDC recommended it.
Despite being a scientist by trade, the University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS omitted the percentage.
That is an example of the scientific fraud technique known as “cherrypicking”.
In July 2024, 20% of Americans were somewhat or very worried that they or a family member would contract COVID-19.
In July 2024, 80% of Americans were not worried that they or a family member would contract COVID-19.
Despite being a scientist by trade, the University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS omitted the percentage entirely.
That is an example of the scientific fraud technique known as “cherrypicking”.
Here’s a picture of the University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS, in a Satanic green sweater:
(the University of Minnesota’s Mary Van Beusekom, MS)
I have included Mary’s picture so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist Freemason of marginal influence looks like.
She figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.
Generational Satanist Freemasons are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise roughly twenty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
———
Survey reveals growing American distrust in vaccines for COVID, other infectious diseases
By Mary Van Beusekom, MS
August 29, 2024
False beliefs proliferate
As of July, 28% of survey respondents mistakenly believed that COVID-19 vaccines have caused thousands of deaths, up from 22% in June 2021, while the proportion who know this is untrue fell from 66% to 55% over the same period.
Twenty-two percent of Americans believe the falsity that it’s less risky to get infected with COVID-19 than to get the vaccine, more than double the 10% with the belief in the months following the 2021 vaccine rollout. The proportion of respondents who mistakenly think that COVID-19 vaccines change human DNA reached 15%, nearly double the 8% who believed it in 2021.
“Belief in these three misconceptions is associated with increased reluctance to vaccinate,” Kathleen Hall Jamieson, director of both Annenberg and the survey, said in an Annenberg news release. “With the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] reporting that COVID-19 infection remains an ongoing threat and [with] an updated vaccine available, now is the time to ramp up awareness both of the value of vaccinating against COVID-19 and of the risks of contracting the disease.”
Few remain concerned about infection
As of July, only 20% of those surveyed were somewhat or very worried that they or a family member will contract COVID-19, down from 25% in February 2024 and 35% in October 2023. In February 2024, 44% of respondents said they were “somewhat likely” or “very likely” to get a yearly COVID-19 vaccine if the CDC recommended it, a drop from 52% in June 2023.
While 66% of respondents said in July that the benefits of COVID-19 vaccines outweigh the risks, higher proportions believe that is true for other vaccines (70% for mpox vaccine in July; 74% for respiratory syncytial virus [RSV] vaccine for adults 60 and older in October 2023, and 89% for the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine in August 2023).
As of July, only 20% of those surveyed were somewhat or very worried that they or a family member will contract COVID-19, down from 25% in February 2024 and 35% in October 2023.
In October 2023, fewer Americans said they thought COVID-19 vaccines were safe (66%) and effective (65%) than thought the same about other vaccines: MMR (81% safe, 83% effective), flu (81%, 75%), shingles (78%, 73%), and pneumonia (74%, 69%).
In July, 49% of participants said they would likely receive a combined single-shot mRNA vaccine to protect against COVID-19, flu, and RSV, if one were developed and the CDC recommended it, while 27% said they would be “not at all likely” to get the vaccine.
Lower flu shot uptake, more doubt about efficacy
In February 2024, 45% of respondents said they received a seasonal flu shot, compared with 50% in January 2023, findings that align with CDC data showing flu vaccine uptake of 47% in January 2024, down from 50% in December 2022. Likewise, 55% of adults say they would likely recommend that an older family member or friend discuss the RSV vaccine with their clinician, a decrease from 61% in August 2023.
The skepticism extends to other vaccines as well, with 32% unsure of the effectiveness of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine aimed at young people, 23% uncertain about the pneumonia vaccine, 19% doubting the shingles vaccine, and 47% unsure about the RSV vaccine during pregnancy or at age 60 and older (37%).
Jeff Miller, Pittsburgh, PA, April 18, 2025
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, please send me a note at [email protected].
