“I am not the law, but I represent justice so far as my feeble powers go.”
― Sherlock Holmes, from “The Adventure of the Three Gables”, by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, 1926
WALLEYE IN OKLAHOMA
From 1953 to 2018, I was able to document 15 examples of the walleye in Oklahoma: 1 in Lake O’the Cherokees in 1953, 1 in Lake Carl Blackwell in 1954, 1 in Keystone Lake in 1960, 1 in Lake Texoma in 1960, 1 in Dugout Creek in 1963, 1 in Lake Hefner in 1967*, 1 in Webbers Falls Reservoir on the Arkansas River in 1992, 1 in Canton Reservoir in the middle North Canadian River in 1992, 1 in Broken Bow Lake in 1993*, 1 in Robert S. Kerr Reservoir in 1995*, 1 in Kaw Lake on the Arkansas River in 1998, and 1 in Lake O’ the Cherokee in 1998, 1 in the Cimarron River in 2017*, 1 in Enid, Oklahoma in 2018*, 1 in Otoe-Missouria Lake in 2017
- indicates walleye not documented in the USGS table for the walleye in Oklahoma.
From 1953 to 1998, the USGS states that 9 of the 9 examples, or 100% of the walleye in their table for the species in Oklahoma were “stocked for sport”.
In 1953, the walleye in Lake O’the Cherokee is three years prior to the purported stocking there in 1965 for which no data is provided, disproving the USGS’s Lake O’ the Cherokee stocking claim.
There’s never been any walleye stocking in Lake Carl Blackwell, which disproves the USGS’s stocking claim for the example collected there in 1954.
There’s never been any walleye stocking in Keystone Lake, which disproves the USGS’s stocking claim for the example collected there in 1960.
There’s never been any walleye stocking in Lake Texoma, which disproves the USGS’s stocking claim for the examples there in 1960.
There’s never been any walleye stocking in Dugout Creek, which disproves the USGS’s stocking claim for the examples there in 1963.
The curiously-undocumented walleye stocking in Lake Hefner in 1956 produced no walleye there from 1956 to 1967, which proves that the USGS’s claim that stocking is the source of the state record walleye from 1967, which the USGS omitted from their table for the species for some unexplained reason, is false.
The curiously-undocumented stocking in the Arkansas River in 1973 produced no walleye in that river from 1973 to 1992, which proves that the USGS’s claim that stocking is the source of the walleye collected in the Arkansas River in 1992 is false.
The stocking of 500,000 walleye fry in Canton Reservoir produced zero walleye there from 1950 to 1992, and the curiously undocumented walleye stocking in the Canton Reservoir in 1973 produced zero walleye there from 1973 to 1992, which proves that the USGS’s claim that stocking was the source of the walleye collected in the Canton Reservoir in 1992 is false.
The curiously-undocumented walleye stocking in the Arkansas River in 1973 produced no examples of the walleye there from 1973 to 1992, which proves that the USGS’s claim that stocking as the source of the walleye collected in the Webbers Falls Reservoir on the Arkansas River in 1992 and in the Webbers Falls Reservoir in 1998 are both false.
The curiously-undocumented walleye stocking in Lake O’ the Cherokee in 1973 produced no examples of the walleye there from 1973 to 1998, which proves that the USGS’s claim that stocking as the source of the walleye collected in Lake O’ the Cherokee in 1998 is false.
I have proved that 9 out of 9 of the USGS’s claims of stocking as the source of the walleye in Oklahoma are false.
The USGS table for the walleye in Oklahoma omits six, or 40% of fifteen examples in this study, namely: 1 Oklahoma state record walleye in Hefner Lake in 1967, 1 Oklahoma state record-tying walleye in Broken Bow Lake in 1993, 1 current Oklahoma state record walleye from Robert S. Kerr Reservoir from 1995, 1 in the Cimarron River in 2017*, 1 in Otoe-Missouria Lake in 2017, and 1 in Enid, Oklahoma in 2018*.
In 1956, the USGS documented a walleye stocking in Lake Hefner, albeit of some unspecified number of walleye fry on some unspecified date in some unspecified month. Yet there are no examples of the walleye in Lake Hefner from that curiously-undocumented stocking in 1956 to this state record in 1968 - which record the USGS table for the species for some unexplained reason neglects to document. Thus, the walleye stocking in Lake Hefner in 1956 either did not take place, or suffered a mortality rate of 100% for some unexplained reason.
There’s never been any walleye stocking in Broken Bow Lake or Robert S. Kerr Reservoir, which proves that neither can have come from walleye stocking.
From 1954 to 2017, the walleye is absent from the record in the Cimarron River in Oklahoma, despite the purported stocking of some undisclosed number of walleye fry there on some undisclosed date in 1956 or prior, which proves that the obfuscated example of the walleye from the Cimarron River from 2017 cannot have come from stocking.
There’s never been any walleye stocking in either Otoe-Missouria Lake or in Enid, Oklahoma.
I have proved that all six of the obfuscated examples of the walleye in this study could not be the product of stocking.
From 1950 to 1984, the USGS documents 13 walleye stockings in Oklahoma: 1 in Canton Reservoir in 1950, 1 in Lake Hiwassee in 1956, 1 in Greenleaf Lake in 1956, 1 in Lake Tenkiller in 1956, 1 in Lake Hefner in 1956, 1 in Lake O’ the Cherokee in 1956, 1 in Pennington Creek in 1956, 1 in the Arkansas River in 1973, 1 in Lake Texoma in 1973, 1 in Fort Gibson Lake in 1973, 1 in Canton Reservoir in 1973, 1 in Keystone Lake in 1976, and 1 in Optima Lake in 1984.
Only one of those stockings, the first one, from 1950, has any data regarding the number of fry that were stocked.
The fact that there are no examples of the walleye in Canton Reservoir from 1950 to 1973 proves either that the stocking of 500,000 walleye fry there in 1950 did not take place, or that stocking suffered a 100% mortality rate for some unexplained reason.
There has never been a single walleye in Lake Hiwassee, Greenleaf Lake, Lake Tenkiller, or Pennington Creek, proving that all of those curiously-undocumented stockings in 1956 either did not take place, or all had 100% mortality rates for some unexplained reason.
The fact that there are no examples of the walleye in Lake Hefner from the curiously-undocumented stocking there in 1956 to the state record walleye which the USGS table for some reason does not document proves either that the stocking did not take place, or suffered a 100% mortality rate for some unexplained reason.
From 1956 to this writing in 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in Lake O’ the Cherokees in Oklahoma, despite the baseless assertion that some unspecified number of walleye fry were stocked there in 1956 on some unspecified date. Proving either that the curiously-undocumented stocking at Lake O’ the Cherokees in 1956 either did not take place, or suffered a 100% mortality rate for some unexplained reason.
The fact that there are no examples of the walleye in the Arkansas River from the curiously-undocumented stocking there in 1973 to 1992 proves either that the 1973 stocking did not take place, or suffered a 100% mortality rate for some unexplained reason.
The fact that there are no examples of the walleye in Lake Texoma from the curiously-undocumented stocking there in 1973 to 1998 proves either that the 1973 stocking did not take place, or suffered a 100% mortality rate for some unexplained reason.
The fact that there there are no examples of the walleye in Fort Gibson Lake from the curiously-undocumented stocking there in 1973 to this writing in 2023 proves either that the stocking did not take place, or suffered a 100% mortality rate for some unexplained reason.
The fact that there are no examples of the walleye in Canton Reservoir from the curiously-undocumented stocking there in 1973 to 1992 proves either that the stocking did not take place, or suffered a 100% mortality rate for some unexplained reason.
The fact that there are no examples of the walleye in Keystone Lake from the curiously-undocumented stocking there in 1976 to 1998 proves either that the stocking did not take place, or suffered a 100% mortality rate for some unexplained reason.
The fact that there are no examples of the walleye in Lake Optima from the curiously-undocumented stocking in 1984 to this writing in 2023 proves either that the walleye stocking did not take place, or suffered a 100% morality rate for some unexplained reason.
I have disproved 12 out of 12, or 100% of the USGS’s walleye stocking claims in Oklahoma from 1950 to 1984.
THE WALLEYE IN OKLAHOMA - ALL THE DATA
On some undocumented date in some undocumented month in 1950, per the USGS, per G.E. Hall’s “Additions to the fish fauna of Oklahoma with a summary of introduced species”, published in the journal “The Southwestern Naturalist” in 1956, some undocumented authority stocked 500,000 walleye fry in Canton Reservoir on the middle North Canadian River.
From 1953 to this writing in 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in Lake O’ the Cherokees in Oklahoma, despite the baseless assertion that some unspecified number of walleye fry were stocked there in 1956 on some unspecified date. If we presume, for the sake of argument, that the stocking actually took place, then the walleye’s absence from the record from 1956 to this writing in 2023 proves that the USGS’s assertion that the stocking which took place in 1956 or prior is false.
In 1953, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the walleye winked into existence in Lake O’ the Cherokees on Wolf Creek in Oklahoma, at weights and lengths obfuscated by the USGS. It would remain in existence there only briefly. In 1953, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from Lake O’ the Cherokees, and remains absent to this day.
Despite the lack of any other examples of the walleye in Lake O’ the Cherokees - or anywhere else in Oklahoma, for that matter - the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there in 1953, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there are no other examples of the walleye there in history proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established there in 1953 is false.
The USGS map for the walleye shows it to be non-indigenous to Oklahoma. Yet here we have an example of it in Lake O’ the Cherokees in 1953 which cannot be attributed to stocking.
Thus, the USGS’s assertion that stocking is the source of the walleye in the Arkansas River in 1953 is false, and the fact that stocking is not the source of the walleye in the Arkansas River in 1953 proves that USGS’s assertion that the walleye is not native to Oklahoma is false.
On August 7, 1953, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the USGS table for the walleye documents seven examples of the walleye in the Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History recent invertebrates collection, all from Lake O’ the Cherokees on Wolf Creek in Oklahoma. However, no weight or length data is provided. Since the specimens undoubtedly exists, then we’ve proven that the USGS has willfully obfuscated the data on them.
Despite the lack of any other examples of the walleye in Lake O’ the Cherokees - or anywhere else in Oklahoma, for that matter - the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there in 1953, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there are no other examples of the walleye there in history proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established there in 1953 is false.
The USGS map for the walleye shows it to be non-indigenous to Oklahoma. Yet here we have an example of it in Lake O’ the Cherokees in 1953 which cannot be attributed to stocking.
Thus, the USGS’s assertion that stocking is the source of the walleye in the Arkansas River in 1953 is false, and the fact that stocking is not the source of the walleye in the Arkansas River in 1953 proves that USGS’s assertion that the walleye is not native to Oklahoma is false.
In 1953, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from Lake O’ the Cherokees in Oklahoma, and remains absent to this day.
From 1954 to 2017, the walleye is absent from the record in Lake Carl Blackwell on the lower Cimarron River in Oklahoma, despite the purported stocking of some undisclosed number of walleye fry there on some undisclosed date in 1956 or prior.
Thus, either the walleye stocking in Lake Hiwassee in 1956 or prior did not take place, or that stocking suffered a mortality rate of 100% for some unexplained reason.
In 1954, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the walleye winked into existence in Lake Carl Blackwell on the lower Cimarron River in Oklahoma, at weights and lengths obfuscated by the USGS. It would remain in existence there only briefly. In 1954, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from Lake Carl Blackwell, and remains absent to this day.
In 1954, per the USGS table for the walleye in Oklahoma, per G.E. Hall’s “Additions to the fish fauna of Oklahoma with a summary of introduced species”, from 1956, the walleye was stocked in Lake Carl Blackwell on the lower Cimarron River in Oklahoma.
Despite the lack of any other examples of the walleye in Lake Carl Blackwell, the USGS nevertheless brazenly states the walleye to be “established” there in 1953, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there are no other examples of the walleye there in history proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established there in 1953 is false.
The USGS map for the walleye shows it to be non-indigenous to Oklahoma. Yet here we have an example of it in Lake Carl Blackwell in 1954 which cannot be attributed to stocking.
Thus, the USGS’s assertion that stocking is the source of the walleye in Lake Carl Blackwell in 1954 is false, and the fact that stocking is not the source of the walleye in Lake Carl Blackwell in 1954 proves that USGS’s assertion that the walleye is not native to Oklahoma is false.
In 1954, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from Lake Carl Blackwell on the lower Cimarron River, and remains absent to this day.
From 1956 to this writing in 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in Lake Hiwassee in Oklahoma, despite the purported stocking of some undisclosed number of walleye fry there on some undisclosed date in 1956 or prior.
Thus, either the walleye stocking in Lake Hiwassee in 1956 or prior did not take place, or that stocking suffered a mortality rate of 100% for some unexplained reason.
In 1956, per the USGS, in “Additions to the fish fauna of Oklahoma with a summary of introduced species”, published in the journal “The Southwestern Naturalist”, G.E. Hall alleged that walleye stocking took place in the Lake Hiwassee on the Deep Fork drainage in Oklahoma. However, there is no data in the USGS table on the walleye in Oklahoma which supports that baseless assertion - no date of the stocking, no number of walleye fry, no size of walleye fry.
Despite the lack of any examples of the walleye in Lake Hiwassee, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there in 1956, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there are no examples of the walleye in Lake Hiwassee proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established there in 1956 is false.
From 1956 to this writing in 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in Greenleaf Lake on the Arkansas River in Oklahoma, despite the purported stocking of some undisclosed number of walleye fry there on some undisclosed date in 1956 or prior.
Thus, either the walleye stocking in Greenleaf Lake in 1956 or prior did not take place, or that stocking suffered a mortality rate of 100% for some unexplained reason.
In 1956, per the USGS, in “Additions to the fish fauna of Oklahoma with a summary of introduced species”, published in the journal “The Southwestern Naturalist”, G.E. Hall alleged that walleye stocking took place in Greenleaf Lake on the Arkansas River drainage in Oklahoma. However, there is no data in the USGS table on the walleye in Oklahoma which supports that baseless assertion - no date of the stocking, no number of walleye fry, no size of walleye fry.
Despite the lack of any examples of the walleye in Greenleaf Lake, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there in 1956, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there are no examples of the walleye in Greenleaf Lake proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established there in 1956 is false.
In 1956, per the USGS, in “Additions to the fish fauna of Oklahoma with a summary of introduced species”, published in the journal “The Southwestern Naturalist”, G.E. Hall alleged that walleye stocking took place in Lake Tenkiller in the Illinois River drainage in Oklahoma. However, there is no data in the USGS table on the walleye in Oklahoma which supports that baseless assertion - no date of the stocking, no number of walleye fry, no size of walleye fry.
Despite the lack of any examples of the walleye in Lake Tenkiller, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there in 1956, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there are no examples of the walleye in Lake Tenkiller proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established there in 1956 is false
In 1956, per the USGS, in “Additions to the fish fauna of Oklahoma with a summary of introduced species”, published in the journal “The Southwestern Naturalist”, G.E. Hall alleged that walleye stocking took place in Lake O’ the Cherokees on Wolf Creek in Oklahoma. However, there is no data in the USGS table on the walleye in Oklahoma which supports that baseless assertion - no date of the stocking, no number of walleye fry, no size of walleye fry.
Despite the fact that the seven lone examples of the walleye in Lake O’ the Cherokees were collected in 1953, three years prior to this alleged walleye stocking in 1956, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there in 1956, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there are no examples of the walleye in Lake O’ the Cherokees from 1956 to this writing in 2023 proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established there in 1956 is false.
In 1956, per the USGS, in “Additions to the fish fauna of Oklahoma with a summary of introduced species”, published in the journal “The Southwestern Naturalist”, G.E. Hall alleged that walleye stocking took place in Hefner Lake on the lower Cimarron-Skelton River in Oklahoma. However, there is no data in the USGS table on the walleye in Oklahoma which supports that baseless assertion - no date or month of the stocking, no number of walleye fry, no size of walleye fry.
Despite the lack of any examples of the walleye in Hefner Lake, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there in 1956, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there are no examples of the walleye in Hefner Lake proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established there in 1956 is false
The fact that there are no examples of the walleye in Hefner Lake from 1956 to present proves either that the walleye stocking there in 1956 did not, in fact, take place, or that stocking suffered a mortality rate of 100% for some unexplained reason.
From 1956 to this writing in 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in Pennington Creek on the lower Washita River in Oklahoma.
In 1956, per the USGS, in “Additions to the fish fauna of Oklahoma with a summary of introduced species”, published in the journal “The Southwestern Naturalist”, G.E. Hall alleged that walleye stocking took place in Pennington Creek on the lower Washita River in Oklahoma. However, there is no data in the USGS table on the walleye in Oklahoma which supports that baseless assertion - no date or month of the stocking, no number of walleye fry, no size of walleye fry.
Despite the lack of any examples of the walleye in Pennington Creek, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there in 1956, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there are no examples of the walleye in Pennington Creek proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established there in 1956 is false
The fact that there are no examples of the walleye in Pennington Creek from 1956 to present proves either that the walleye stocking there in 1956 did not, in fact, take place, as alleged, or that stocking suffered a mortality rate of 100% for some unexplained reason.
These six examples from Oklahoma from 1956 illustrate how one generational Satanist mouthpiece, namely the Southwestern Naturalist’s G.E. Hall, and one wholly-controlled-and-coopted Federal Agency, namely the USGS, can, yes, conspire together with one another to put forward a false picture of a realty which does not, in fact, exist.
I am exposing their duplicity by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In 1960, in the absence of any walleye stocking in either location, the walleye winked into existence simultaneously in Oklahoma in Keystone Lake and Lake Texoma. It would remain in existence in both locations only briefly. In 1960, after less than a year in existence, the walleye disappeared simultaneously from Keystone Lake and Lake Texoma. It would reappear briefly in Lake Texoma in 1998, then disappeared again, and remains absent to this day. It remains absent from Keystone Lake to this day.
In 1960, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the walleye winked into existence in Keystone Lake in Oklahoma, at a length and weight obfuscated by the USGS. It would remain in existence there only briefly. In 1960, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from Keystone Lake in Oklahoma, and remains absent to this day.
Despite the lack of any other examples of the walleye Keystone Lake - or anywhere else in Oklahoma, for that matter - the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there in 1960, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that this is the only example of the walleye in Keystone Lake in history - or anywhere else in Oklahoma, for that matter - proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established there in 1960 is false.
The USGS map for the walleye shows it to be non-indigenous to Oklahoma. Yet here we have an example of it in Keystone Lake which cannot be attributed to walleye stocking.
Thus, the USGS’s assertion that stocking is the source of the walleye in Keystone Lake in 1960 is false, and the fact that stocking is not the source of the walleye in Keystone Lake in 1960 proves that USGS’s assertion that the walleye is not native to Oklahoma is false.
In 1960, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the walleye winked into existence in Lake Texoma in Oklahoma, at a length and weight obfuscated by the USGS. It would remain in existence there only briefly. In 1960, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from Lake Texoma in Oklahoma. It would remain absent for thirty eight years. In 1998, the walleye winked back into existence in Lake Texoma. It would remain in existence there only briefly. In 1998, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from Lake Texoma, and remains absent to this day.
Despite the lack of any other examples of the walleye Lake Texoma, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there in 1960, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that, at this point, this is there the only example of the walleye in Lake Texoma in history proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established there in 1960 is false.
The USGS map for the walleye shows it to be non-indigenous to Oklahoma. Yet here we have an example of it in Lake Texoa which cannot be attributed to walleye stocking.
Thus, the USGS’s assertion that stocking is the source of the walleye in Lake Texoma in 1960 is false, and the fact that stocking is not the source of the walleye in Lake Texoma in 1960 proves that USGS’s assertion that the walleye is not native to Oklahoma is false.
On June 22, 1960, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the USGS table for the walleye documents an example of the walleye from Keystone Lake on the Cimarron River in Oklahoma, in the Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History recent invertebrates collection. However, no weight or length data is provided. Since the specimen undoubtedly exists, then we’ve proven that the USGS obfuscated the data on it.
Despite the lack of any other examples of the walleye in Keystone Lake - or anywhere else in Oklahoma, for that matter - the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there in 1960, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that, at this point, this is the only example of the walleye in Keytsone Lake in history - or anywhere else in Oklahoma, for that matter - proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established there in 1960 is false.
The USGS map for the walleye shows it to be non-indigenous to Oklahoma. Yet here we have an example of it in Keystone Lake which cannot be attributed to walleye stocking.
Thus, the USGS’s assertion that stocking is the source of the walleye in Keystone Lake in 1960 is false, and the fact that stocking is not the source of the walleye in Keystone Lake in 1960 proves that USGS’s assertion that the walleye is not native to Oklahoma is false.
In 1960, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from Keystone Lake in Oklahoma. It remains absent to this day.
In August 1960, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the USGS table for the walleye documents an example of the walleye from Lake Texoma in Oklahoma, in the Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History recent invertebrates collection. However, no weight or length data is provided. Since the specimen undoubtedly exists, then we’ve proven that the USGS obfuscated the data on it.
Despite the lack of any other examples of the walleye Keystone Lake, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there in 1960, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that this is the only example of the walleye in Keystone Lake in history proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established there in 1960 is false.
The USGS map for the walleye shows it to be non-indigenous to Oklahoma. Yet here we have an example of it in Keystone Lake which cannot be attributed to walleye stocking.
Thus, the USGS’s assertion that stocking is the source of the walleye in Keystone Lake in 1960 is false, and the fact that stocking is not the source of the walleye in Keystone Lake in 1960 proves that USGS’s assertion that the walleye is not native to Oklahoma is false.
In 1960, or soon after, the walleye disappeared simultaneously from Oklahoma from Lake Texoma and Keystone Lake. It winked briefly back into existence in Lake Texoma in 1998, then disappeared again, and remains absent to this day. It remains absent from Keystone Lake to this day.
In 1960, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from Lake Texoma in Oklahoma. It would remain absent for thirty eight years. In 1998, the walleye winked back into existence in Lake Texoma. It would remain in existence there only briefly. In 1998, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from Lake Texoma, and remains absent to this day.
In 1960, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from Keystone Lake in Oklahoma, and remains absent to this day.
In 1963, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the walleye winked into existence in Dugout Creek on the middle Beaver River drainage in Oklahoma. It would remain in existence there only briefly. In 1963, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from Dugout Creek, and remains absent to this day.
On April 5, 1963, the USGS table for the walleye documents a single example of the walleye in Dugout Creek on the middle Beaver River in Oklahoma, in the Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History recent invertebrates collection. However, no weight or length data is provided. Since the specimen undoubtedly exists, then we’ve proven that the USGS obfuscated the data on it.
Despite the lack of any other examples of the walleye in the Dugout Creek, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there in 1963, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there this is the only example of the walleye in the Dugout Creek in history proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established there in 1963 is false.
The USGS map for the walleye shows it to be non-indigenous to Oklahoma. Yet here we have example of it in the Dugout Creek which cannot be attributed to stocking.
Thus, the USGS’s assertion that stocking is the source of the walleye in the Dugout Creek in 1963 is false, and the fact that stocking is not the source of the walleye in the Dugout Creek in 1963 proves that USGS’s assertion that the walleye is not native to Oklahoma is false.
In 1963, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Dugout Creek on the middle Beaver River in Oklahoma, and remains absent to this day.
From 1967 to 1993, the weight of the Oklahoma state record walleye remained unchanged, at 11 pounds, 4.3 ounces.
In 1967, eleven years after the first and only walleye stocking there, the walleye winked into existence in Lake Hefner in Oklahoma at a state-record weight of 11.3 pounds. Yet the USGS table for the species omits this example. Why? It would remain in existence there only briefly.
In 1967, the first-ever Oklahoma state record walleye was caught in Oklahoma City’s Lake Hefner. It weighed 11 pounds, 4.3 ounces.
Yet, from 1953 to 1963, the USGS documents five examples of the walleye in Oklahoma: 1 in Lake O’the Cherokees in 1953, 1 in Lake Carl Blackwell in 1954, 1 in Keystone Lake in 1960, 1 in Lake Texoma in 1960, 1 in Dugout Creek in 1963. Why weren’t any of those five examples of the walleye in Oklahoma awarded the Oklahoma state record?
In 1956, the USGS documented a walleye stocking in Lake Hefner, albeit of some unspecified number of walleye fry on some unspecified date in some unspecified month. Yet there are no examples of the walleye in Lake Hefner from that curiously-undocumented stocking in 1956 to this state record in 1968 - which record the USGS table for the species for some unexplained reason neglects to document.
Thus, the walleye stocking in Lake Hefner in 1956 either did not take place, or suffered a mortality rate of 100% for some unexplained reason.
In 1967, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from Lake Hefner, and remains absent to this day.
From 1973 to 1992, there are no examples of the walleye in the Arkansas River in Oklahoma, despite the purported stocking of some undisclosed number of walleye fry there on some undisclosed date in 1973.
Thus, either the walleye stocking in the Arkansas River in 1973 did not take place, or that stocking suffered a mortality rate of 100% for some unexplained reason.
In 1973, per the USGS, in “The Fishes of Oklahoma”, R.J. Miller and H.W. Robinson allege that walleye stocking took place in the Arkansas River from Keystone Lake to White Eagle. However, there is no data in the USGS table on the walleye in Oklahoma which supports that baseless assertion - no date of the stocking, no number of walleye fry, no size of walleye fry.
Despite the lack of any examples of the walleye in the Arkansas River, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there in 1973, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there are no examples of the walleye in the Arkansas River from 1973 to 1992 proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established there in 1973 is false.
From 1973 to 1998, there are no examples of the walleye in Lake Texoma in Oklahoma.
In 1973, per the USGS, in “The Fishes of Oklahoma”, R.J. Miller and H.W. Robinson allege that walleye stocking took place in Lake Texoma in Oklahoma. However, there is no data in the USGS table on the walleye in Oklahoma which supports that baseless assertion - no date of the stocking, no number of walleye fry, no size of walleye fry.
Despite the lack of any examples of the walleye in Lake Texoma, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there in 1973, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there are no examples of the walleye in the Lake Texoma from 1973 to 1998 proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established there in 1973 is false.
But, despite the lack of any data, let’s presume that the 1973 walleye stocking in Lake Texoma which R.J. Miller and H.W. Robinson allege did, in fact, take place. If it did, then why are there no examples of the walleye there from 1973 to 1998? Either the stocking did not take place, as alleged, or that stocking had a morality rate of 100% for some unexplained reason.
From 1973 to this writing in 2023, there are no examples of the walleye in Fort Gibson Lake on the lower Neosho River in Oklahoma.
In 1973, per the USGS, in “The Fishes of Oklahoma”, R.J. Miller and H.W. Robinson allege that walleye stocking took place in Fort Gibson Lake in Oklahoma. However, there is no data in the USGS table on the walleye in Oklahoma which supports that baseless assertion - no month or date of the stocking, no number of walleye fry, no size of walleye fry.
Despite the lack of any examples of the walleye in Fort Gibson Lake, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there in 1973, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there are no examples of the walleye in the Fort Gibson Lake proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established there in 1973 is false.
But, despite the lack of any data, let’s presume that the 1973 walleye stocking in Lake which R.J. Miller and H.W. Robinson allege did, in fact, take place. If it did, then why are there no examples of the walleye there from 1973 to this writing in 2023? Either the stocking did not take place, as alleged, or that stocking had a morality rate of 100% for some unexplained reason.
In 1973, per the USGS, in “The Fishes of Oklahoma”, R.J. Miller and H.W. Robinson allege that walleye stocking took place in Canton Reservoir in Oklahoma. However, there is no data in the USGS table on the walleye in Oklahoma which supports that baseless assertion - no month or date of the stocking, no number of walleye fry, no size of walleye fry.
Despite the lack of any examples of the walleye in Canton Reservoir from the purported stocking of 500,000 walleye fry there in 1950 to this new (and in this case completely unsubstantiated) stocking claim in 1973, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there in 1973, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there are no examples of the walleye in Canton Reservoir from 1950 to 1973 proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established there in 1973 is false.
But, despite the lack of any data, let’s presume that the 1973 walleye stocking in Canton Reservoir which R.J. Miller and H.W. Robinson allege did, in fact, take place. If it did, then why are there no examples of the walleye there from 1973 to 1992? Either the stocking did not take place, as alleged, or that stocking had a morality rate of 100% for some unexplained reason.
Here, in these five examples from Oklahoma from 1973, we can see how just a couple of generational Satanist mouthpieces, namely R.J. Miller and H.W. Robinson, and one wholly-controlled-and-coopted Federal Agency, namely the USGS, can, yes, conspire together with one another to put forward a false picture of a realty which does not, in fact, exist.
I am exposing their duplicity by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
From 1976 to 1998, the walleye is absent from the record in Keystone Lake in Oklahoma.
In 1976, per the USGS, per D.L. Pritchard, O.D. May, Jr., and L. Rider’s “Stocking of predators in the predator-stocking-evaluation reservoirs”, published in in the Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Southeastern Association of Game and Fish Commissioners in 1976, walleye stocking took place in Keystone Lake in Oklahoma. However, there is no data in the USGS table on the walleye in Oklahoma which supports that baseless assertion - no day or month of the stocking, no number of walleye fry, no size of walleye fry.
Despite the fact that the only example of the walleye in Keystone Lake is from 1960, which is sixteen years prior to this alleged stocking, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there in 1976, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there are no examples of the walleye in Keystone Lake from this purported stocking in 1976 to 1998 proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established there in 1973 is false.
But, despite the lack of any data, let’s presume that the alleged 1976 walleye stocking in Keystone Lake did, in fact, take place. If it did, then why are there no examples of the walleye there from 1976 to 1998? Either the stocking did not take place, as alleged, or that stocking had a morality rate of 100% for some unexplained reason.
From 1976 to 1998, the walleye is absent from the record in Lake Spavinaw on the lower Neosho River in Oklahoma.
In 1976, per the USGS, per D.L. Pritchard, O.D. May, Jr., and L. Rider’s “Stocking of predators in the predator-stocking-evaluation reservoirs”, published in in the Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Southeastern Association of Game and Fish Commissioners in 1976, walleye stocking took place in Lake Spavinaw in Oklahoma. However, there is no data in the USGS table on the walleye in Oklahoma which supports that baseless assertion - no day or month of the stocking, no number of walleye fry, no size of walleye fry.
Despite the fact that there are no examples of the walleye in Lake Spavinaw, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there in 1976, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there are no examples of the walleye in Lake Spavinaw from this purported stocking in 1976 to this writing in 2023 proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established there in 1973 is false.
But, despite the lack of any data, let’s presume that the alleged 1976 walleye stocking in Keystone Lake did, in fact, take place. If it did, then why are there no examples of the walleye there from 1976 to this writing in 2023? Either the stocking did not take place, as alleged, or that stocking had a morality rate of 100% for some unexplained reason.
From 1976 to 1998, the walleye is absent from the record in Lake Eucha on the lower Neosho River in Oklahoma.
In 1976, per the USGS, per D.L. Pritchard, O.D. May, Jr., and L. Rider’s “Stocking of predators in the predator-stocking-evaluation reservoirs”, published in in the Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Southeastern Association of Game and Fish Commissioners in 1976, walleye stocking took place in Lake Eucha in Oklahoma. However, there is no data in the USGS table on the walleye in Oklahoma which supports that baseless assertion - no day or month of the stocking, no number of walleye fry, no size of walleye fry.
Despite the fact that there are no examples of the walleye in Lake Eucha, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there in 1976, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there are no examples of the walleye in Lake Eucha from this purported stocking in 1976 to this writing in 2023 proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established there in 1973 is false.
But, despite the lack of any data, let’s presume that the alleged 1976 walleye stocking in Keystone Eucha did, in fact, take place. If it did, then why are there no examples of the walleye there from 1976 to this writing in 2023? Either the stocking did not take place, as alleged, or that stocking had a morality rate of 100% for some unexplained reason.
From 1976 to 1992, the walleye is absent from the record in Canton Reservoir on the middle North Canadian River in Oklahoma.
In 1976, per the USGS, per D.L. Pritchard, O.D. May, Jr., and L. Rider’s “Stocking of predators in the predator-stocking-evaluation reservoirs”, published in in the Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Southeastern Association of Game and Fish Commissioners in 1976, walleye stocking took place in Canton Reservoir in Oklahoma. However, there is no data in the USGS table on the walleye in Oklahoma which supports that baseless assertion - no day or month of the stocking, no number of walleye fry, no size of walleye fry.
Despite the fact that there are no examples of the walleye in Canton Reservoir from 1973 to 1976, and further despite the fact that some unknown number of walleye fry were purportedly stocked there in 1973 by some unknown agency on some unknown day of some unknown month, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there in 1976, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there are no examples of the walleye in Lake Eucha from this purported stocking in 1976 to 1992 proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established there in 1976 is false.
But, despite the lack of any data, let’s presume that the alleged 1976 walleye stocking in Canton Reservoir did, in fact, take place. If it did, then why are there no examples of the walleye there from 1976 to 1992? Either the stocking in 1976 did not take place, as alleged, or that stocking had a morality rate of 100% for some unexplained reason.
Here, in these four examples from Oklahoma from 1976, we can see how just a couple of few Satanist mouthpieces, namely D.L. Pritchard, O.D. May, Jr., and L. Rider, and one wholly-controlled-and-coopted Federal Agency, namely the USGS, can, yes, conspire together with one another to put forward a false picture of a realty which does not, in fact, exist.
I am exposing their duplicity by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In 1984, walleye stocking took place in Lake Optima in the Canadian drainage in Oklahoma, that is, according to J. Pigg’s “Survey of fishes in the Oklahoma panhandle and Harper County, northwestern Oklahoma”, published in the Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science in 2013, per the USGS table for the walleye in Oklahoma. However, there is no data in the USGS table on the walleye in Oklahoma which supports that baseless assertion - no date of the stocking, no number of walleye fry, no size of walleye fry.
Despite the lack of any examples of the walleye in Lake Optima, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there in 1984, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there are no examples of the walleye in Lake Optima proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established there in 1984 is false.
From 1992 to this writing in 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in the Arkansas River in Oklahoma, despite the purported stocking of some undisclosed number of walleye fry there on some undisclosed date in 1973.
The fact that the walleye is absent from the record from 1973 to 1992 proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking is the source of the walleye there in 1992 is false, and that the stocking in 1973 either did not take place, as alleged, or suffered a 100% mortality rate for some unexplained reason.
In 1992, the walleye winked into existence simultaneously in Oklahoma in the Webber Falls Reservoir on the Arkansas River and in the Canton Reservoir on the middle North Canadian River. It would remain in both locations only briefly. In 1992, or soon after the walleye disappeared simultaneously from Webbers Falls Reservoir and Canton Reservoir. It remains absent from Webbers Falls to this day. It reappeared briefly in Canton Reservoir in 1995, then disappeared again, and remains absent to this day.
In 1992, in the absence of any walleye stocking there for which any data is provided, the walleye winked into existence in the Webbers Falls Reservoir on the Arkansas River in Oklahoma at a weight and length obfuscated by the USGS. It would remain in existence there only briefly. In 1992, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Webbers Falls Reservoir on the Arkansas River in Oklahoma, and remains absent to this day.
In 1992, 42 years after some unknown agency stocked 500,000 walleye fry there on some unknown day of some unknown month, and with no prior examples of the walleye there from that stocking in 1950 to 1992, the walleye winked into existence in Canton Reservoir on the middle North Canadian River, It would remain in existence there only briefly. after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from Canton Reservoir. It would remain absent for three years. In 1995, the walleye winked back into existence in Persimmon Creek on the middle North Canadian River in Oklahoma. It would once again remain in existence there only briefly. In 1995, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the middle North Canadian River in Oklahoma, and remains absent to this day.
On June 10, 1992, the USGS table for the walleye documents an example of the walleye from the Webbers Falls Reservoir on the Arkansas River in Oklahoma, in the Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History recent invertebrates collection. However, no weight or length data is provided. Since the specimen undoubtedly exists, then we’ve proven that the USGS obfuscated the data on it.
Despite the lack of any other examples of the walleye in the Arkansas River - or anywhere else in Oklahoma, for that matter - the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there in 1992, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there this is the only example of the walleye in the Arkansas River in history proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established there in 1992 is false.
The USGS map for the walleye shows it to be non-indigenous to Oklahoma. Yet there’s an example of it in the Arkansas River in 1992 which cannot be attributed to the first and only walleye stocking in the Arkansas River in 1973, which stocking is supported by no actual data, and which stocking produced no walleye in the Arkansas from 1973 to 1992.
Thus, the USGS’s assertion that stocking is the source of the walleye in the Arkansas River in 1992 is false, and the fact that stocking is not the source of the walleye in the Arkansas River in 1992 proves that USGS’s assertion that the walleye is not native to Oklahoma is false.
In 1992, or soon after, after less than a year in existence, the walleye disappeared simultaneously from Oklahoma from Webbers Falls Reservoir on the Arkansas River and Canton Reservoir on the middle North Canadian River. It would remain in both locations only briefly. In 1992, or soon after, the walleye disappeared simultaneously in Montana from Webbers Falls Reservoir and the Canton Reservoir. It winked briefly back into existence in the Canton Reservoir in 1995, then disappeared once again, and remains absent to this day. It remains absent from Webbers Falls Reservoir to this day.
In 1992, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Webbers Falls Reservoir on the Arkansas River in Oklahoma, and remains absent to this day.
In 1992, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Canton Reservoir on the middle North Canadian River. In 1995, after an absence of three years, the walleye briefly winked back into existence in the Canton Reservoir. It would once again remain in existence there only briefly. In 1995, or soon the walleye once again disappeared from Canton Reservoir, and remains absent to this day.
On July 9, 1992, 42 years after some unknown agency stocked 500,000 walleye fry there on some unknown day of some unknown month, the USGS table for the walleye documents a single example of the walleye in the Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History recent invertebrates collection, from lower Canton Lake in Oklahoma. However, no weight or length data is provided. Since the specimen undoubtedly exists, then we’ve proven that the USGS has willfully obfuscated the data on it.
Despite the lack of any other examples of the walleye in Canton Reservoir, and further despite the fact that the walleye is absent from the record in Canton Reservoir from that lone, hazily-remembered stocking in 1950 to 1992, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there in 1953, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there are no other examples of the walleye there from 1950 to 1992 proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established there in 1992 is false.
The USGS map for the walleye shows it to be non-indigenous to Oklahoma. Yet here we have an example of it in Canton Reservoir in 1992 which cannot be attributed to stocking.
Thus, the USGS’s assertion that stocking is the source of the walleye in the Canton Reservoir in 1992 is false, and the fact that stocking is not the source of the walleye in the Canton Reservoir in 1992 proves that USGS’s assertion that the walleye is not native to Oklahoma is false.
From 1993 to 1995, the Oklahoma state record walleye increased in size by 11.7%, from 11 pounds, 4.3 ounces to 12 pounds, 10 ounces.
In 1993, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the walleye winked into existence in Broken Bow Lake in Oklahoma at a state record-tying 11 pounds, 4.3 ounces. It would remain in existence there only briefly. In 1993, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from Broken Bow Lake, and remains absent to this day.
In 1993, the Oklahoma state record walleye was caught at Broken Bow Lake. It weighed 11 pounds, 4.3 ounces, and tied the first-ever Oklahoma state record from twenty eight years earlier, in 1967. Tied to the tenth? I’m guessing that’s yet another example of rigging by the state authorities, but we’ll have to put that aside for now.
Did I mention that there has never been any walleye stocking in Broken Bow Lake? Which proves that stocking cannot be the source of the walleye there in 1993, which in turn proves that the USGS’s claim that the walleye is non-indigenous to Oklahoma is false.
it was tied by a walleye caught at Broken Bow Lake and finally broken two years later by a 12-pound, 10-ounce walleye pulled from Altus-Lugert.
On September 18, 1993, per the USGS, seventeen years after the last purported stocking of the North Canadian River in Oklahoma, for which no data of any kind was provided, and within the context of no examples of the walleye in the North Canadian River from 1976 to 1992, the Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History collected a single example of the walleye in the Upper Cimarron River in Oklahoma.
Despite the the fact that this is just a single example, and further despite the fact that the walleye is absent from the record in the North Canadian River from 1950 to 1992, and again from 1998 to this writing in 2023, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there in 1993, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there are no other examples of the walleye in the North Canadian River in 1992 proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established there in 1993 is false.
The USGS map for the walleye shows it to be non-indigenous to Oklahoma. Yet here we have an example of it in the North Canadian River in 1993 which cannot be attributed to stocking.
Thus, the USGS’s assertion that stocking is the source of the walleye in the North Canadian River in 1993 is false, and the fact that stocking is not the source of the walleye in the North Canadian River in 1993 proves that USGS’s assertion that the walleye is not native to Oklahoma is false.
In 1993, or soon after, the walleye disappeared simultaneously in Montana from Canton Reservoir and Broken Bow Lake. It reappeared briefly in Canton Reservoir in 1995, then disappeared again, and remains absent to this day. It remains absent from Broken Bow Lake to this day.
In 1993, after less than two years in existence there, the walleye once again disappeared from Canton Reservoir. It would remain absent for two years. In 1995, the walleye winked back into existence in the North Canadian River the walleye once again disappeared from the middle North Canadian River in Oklahoma, and remains absent to this day.
In 1993, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from Broken Bow Lake, and remains absent to this day.
In 1995, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the walleye winked into existence in the Robert S. Kerr Reservoir in Oklahoma at a state record weight of 12 pounds, 3 ounces. It would remain in existence there only briefly. In 1995, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Robert S. Kerr Reservoir in Oklahoma, and remains absent to this day.
In 1995, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, Kerry Carter caught the current Oklahoma state record walleye in Robert S. Kerr Reservoir. It weighed 12 pounds, 3 ounces.
In 1995, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Robert S. Kerr Reservoir in Oklahoma, and remains absent to this day.
In 1998, twenty five years after the first an only purported walleye stocking there, albeit in the absence of any actual data on that stocking, and in the face of zero examples of the walleye in the Arkansas River from 1973 to 1992, and zero examples of the walleye in Lake O’ the Cherokees from 1973 to 1998, the walleye winked into existence simultaneously in Oklahoma in Kaw Lake and Lake O’ the Cherokees. It would remain in existence in both locations only briefly. In 1998, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared simultaneously from Kaw Lake and Lake O’ the Cherokees in Oklahoma, and remains absent to this day.
In 1998, twenty five years after the first an only purported walleye stocking there, albeit in the absence of any actual data on that stocking, and in the face of zero examples of the walleye there from 1973 to 1998, the walleye winked into existence in Kaw Lake on the Arkansas River in Oklahoma. It would remain in existence there only briefly. In 1998, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from Kaw Lake in Oklahoma, and remains absent to this day.
In 1998, twenty five years after the first an only purported walleye stocking there in 1973, albeit in the absence of any actual data on that stocking, and in the face of zero examples of the walleye there from 1973 to 1998, the walleye winked into existence in Lake O’ the Cherokees in Oklahoma. It would remain in existence there only briefly. In 1998, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from Lake O’ the Cherokees in Oklahoma, and remains absent to this day.
On June 22, 1998, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the USGS table for the walleye documents an example of the walleye from Kaw Lake on the Arkansas River in Oklahoma, in the Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History recent invertebrates collection. However, no weight or length data is provided. Since the specimen undoubtedly exists, then we’ve proven that the USGS obfuscated the data on it.
Despite fact that there are only two examples of the walleye in the Arkansas River in history, in 1992 and 1998, and, further despite the fact that there are no examples of the walleye in the Arkansas River from 1973, when the first and only alleged stocking of the Arkansas took place (albeit on an unspecified date of an unspecified number of walleye fry), the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there in 1992, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there are only two examples of the walleye in the Arkansas River in history proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established there in 1992 and 1998 are both false.
The USGS map for the walleye shows it to be non-indigenous to Oklahoma. Yet there’s an example of it in the Arkansas River in 1998 which cannot be attributed to the first and only walleye stocking in the Arkansas River in 1973, which stocking is supported by no actual data, and which stocking produced no walleye in the Arkansas from 1973 to 1992.
Thus, the USGS’s assertion that stocking is the source of the walleye in the Arkansas River in 1998 is false, and the fact that stocking is not the source of the walleye in the Arkansas River in 1998 proves that USGS’s assertion that the walleye is not native to Oklahoma is false.
On September 26, 1998, twenty five years after the first and only stocking there in 1973, albeit which stocking is not accompanied by any data, the USGS table for the walleye documents a single example of the walleye from Lake O’ the Cherokees in Oklahoma, in the Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History recent invertebrates collection. However, no weight or length data is provided. Since the specimen undoubtedly exists, then we’ve proven that the USGS obfuscated the data on it.
Despite fact that this is the only examples of the walleye in Lake O’ the Cherokees in history, and, further despite the fact that there are no examples of the walleye in the Arkansas River from 1973, when the first and only alleged stocking of the Lake O’ the Cherokees took place (albeit on an unspecified date of an unspecified number of walleye fry), the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there in 1998, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there is only one example of the walleye in Lake O’ the Cherokees in history proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established there in 1998 is false.
The USGS map for the walleye shows it to be non-indigenous to Oklahoma. Yet here we have an example of it in the Lake O’ the Cherokees in 1998 which cannot be attributed to the first and only walleye stocking in the Arkansas River in 1973, which stocking is supported by no actual data, and which stocking produced no walleye in the Arkansas from 1973 to 1992.
Thus, the USGS’s assertion that stocking is the source of the walleye in the Lake O’ the Cherokees is false, and the fact that stocking is not the source of the walleye in the Lake O’ the Cherokees in 1998 proves that USGS’s assertion that the walleye is not native to Oklahoma is false.
In 1998, or soon after, the walleye disappeared simultaneously in Oklahoma from Kaw Lake and Lake O’ the Cherokees, and remains absent to this day.
In 1998, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from Kaw Lake in Oklahoma, and remains absent to this day.
In 1998, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from Lake O’ the Cherokees in Oklahoma, and remains absent to this day.
On May 7, 2017, fishermap.org documents an example of the walleye in the Cimarron River in Oklahoma.
The USGS table for the walleye in Oklahoma omits the example of the walleye in the Cimmaron River in 2017. Why?
On December 29, 2017, fishermap.org documents an example of the walleye in Oboe-Missouria Lake in Oklahoma.
The USGS table for the walleye in Oklahoma omits the example of the walleye in the Otoe-Missouria Lake in 2017. Why?
On July 3, 2018, fishermap.org documents an example of the walleye in Enid, Oklahoma, where there are no apparent bodies of water.
The USGS table for the walleye in Oklahoma omits the example of the walleye in Enid, Oklahoma in 2017. Why?
Jeff Miller, Libertyville, Illinois, August 18, 2023
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, please send me a note at [email protected]
