Increasing water clarity - new additions

Here are some great new additions to the “Increasing Water Clarity” article, along with a revised master article for the folks on my mailing list.

I’m also adding the revised “short version” introduction and metrics piece at the beginning of the article, here.

In March 2018, the Duluth News Tribune said “Zebra mussels double water clarity in Lake Winnibigoshish”.

Where the bullshit plausible-deniability excuse “zebra mussels” is put forward at the local level to keep your eyes off the wider trend of increasing water clarity that I’m documenting for the record here. It’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those many variants is “astounded”. That’s why the article goes on to say “The words For Big Winnie, the water clarity increase has been rapid and astounding - more than doubling, from 6-7 feet before the mussels arrived to 14 feet and more now.”

This article is behind a paywall, so that’s all that I can read of it. Putting articles behind paywalls is another example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

In November 2018, stormlakeradio.com said “NR Fisheries Biologist Talks Storm Lake Water Clarity ; Aquatic Vegetation Management”.

Can you see how the headline covers up the sudden, exponential increase in Iowa’s Storm Lake with the general “talks water clarity”?

The propagandist knows that, since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, this hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the sudden, systemic increase in water clarity that is taking place regardless of geography that I’m documenting here.

The article goes on to say “DNR Fisheries Biologist Ben Wallace says Storm Lake has seen an increase in water clarity over the last four years…(audio clip below :34 )”

“Wallace wants to alleviate concerns about aquatic vegetation having a negative effect on property values…(audio clip below :22 )”

Wait, what? Can you see how he just flipped a lake that is transforming suddenly and rapidly for the better with “concerns about aquatic vegetation”?

“Wallace says aquatic vegetation is good as far as ecology and water quality, but it starts to hamper recreation at a certain point. He has talked with Storm Lake City Manager Keri Navratil about forming a committee this fall to draft a vegetation management plan.”

Where “vegetation management plan” is Wallace using Mil-speak to say we have to dump poison into the lake to cut back the suddenly-burgeoning underwater life, there.

The article goes on to say “Wallace spoke at the Storm Lake City Council meeting this week. The DNR Fishing Report with Ben Wallace can be heard shortly before 7am on Saturdays on KAYL and KKIA.”

In a time-honored technique similar to burying the information in a separate table, the introduction above has a box below it, where you click a recording of DNR Fisheries Biologist Ben Wallace saying “it’s likely a combination of all the improvement projects that we’ve done, things that you see goin’ on in the watershed, we’ve done some dredging, the city…Storm Lake has done some, uh, improvement, uh, projects, weather patterns and in lower rough fish numbers, and we can’t, uh, assign, like, one foot of clarity is from dredging, one foot of clarity is from our little Storm Lake project, likely, in any give year, they’re having a different effect, based on the weather and water levels and stuff, but that was the goal of doing all these works, that what we’ve invested so much in over these past fifteen to twenty years, it’s to improve water quality.”

I’m going to include the link, so that you can listen to him blow the cloud of smoke, like a middle schooler bullshitting on an essay they didn’t read the material for.

Did you notice that virtually everything he said was general? There’s no mention, specifically, as to what the clarity increase was, rather only “an increase in water clarity over the last four years.” Wallace takes pains to say “over these last fifteen to twenty years” as a smoke screen to cover the sudden, exponential increase in water clarity that’s taken place in Storm Lake over the last four years. He doesn’t explain why twenty years of effort would only begin to take effect sixteen year later.

But out populace is ignorant and credulous enough that Ben keeps his high-paying, pensioned, taxpayer-funded job, and gets quoted in mainstream news articles, despite talking like an idiot in a completely unscientific way, e.g. “based on the weather and water levels and stuff”.

DNR Fisheries Biologist Ben Wallace doesn’t mention anything about exponentially improving water clarity in Storm Lake maps against similar increases in clarity being seen regardless of geography. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.

Here’s Ben’s picture, using a purportedly-secret Illuminist hand gesture:

[image]

(DNR Fisheries Biologist Ben Wallace)

I’ve included his photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.

In May 2020, estormwater.com said “Florida Canals Improve Water Clarity”

The subhead reads “Sanibel, Florida is improving the water quality of its canals after not meeting criteria for algae.”

The article goes on to say “The City of Sanibel, Florida is improving the water quality of its canals with the Sanibel Clean Canals Program.”

Where the author, Christina Tuser, twice uses the hedging generality “improving the water quality” to play the ruse that local efforts in Sanibel, Florida are increasing the water clarity there, or will be, anyway, once the “Sanibel Clean Canals Program” gets going in earnest.

The article goes on to say “The city started the program with the Sanibel Captiva Conservation Foundation (SCCF), which is dedicated to the conservation of coastal habitats and aquatic resources on Sanibel and Captiva and in the surrounding watershed. According to Mark Thompson, who headed the project for SCCF, said the findings are concerning but typical for canals, reported NBC2. Over 90% of the canals surveyed did not meet state water quality criteria for the amount of algae they have in them, Thompson said.”

Boldly, brazenly, Mark Thompson, project lead for the Sanibel Clean Canals Program says the canals are in bad shape, directly in the face of their sudden, exponential increase in clarity. A populace too dim to look out the window will smile and cluck when they later read that the program was successful, and that water clarity in the canals has improved.

Ms. Tuser’s hit-piece is designed to “compartmentalize” awareness of the sudden, systemic increase in water clarity taking place regardless of geography that I’m documenting here.

In November 2020, several years after a sudden, exponential increase in water clarity, there, the St. John’s River Water Management District said “Project to improve water quality in Indian River Lagoon moves forward”.

The article goes on to say “The completed project will reduce the flow of nutrients and sediments to the lagoon by re-diverting stormwater west where it historically flowed to the St. Johns River. Major project components include an operable weir, a stormwater pump station and a stormwater treatment area to ensure that nutrients and sediments are removed prior to the water’s return to the St. Johns River.”

Once the project is complete, a follow-on article will be published, crowing “water clarity improvement project successful!”

It’s only in an article such as this, which documents the sudden, systemic increase in water clarity taking place regardless of geography, in which the strategy of deception is laid bare.

In January 2021, Ziyao Yin, Junsheng Li, Jue Huang, Shenglei Wang, Fangfang Zhang & Bing Zhang Published “Steady increase in water clarity in Jiaozhou Bay in the Yellow Sea from 2000 to 2018 : Observations from MODIS” in the Journal of Oceanology and Limnology volume 39, pages 800–813.

Where the only-generally described “steady increase” over 18 years covers up a sudden, exponential increase in water clarity in Jiaozhou Bay in the Yellow Sea.

INCREASING WATER QUALITY AND CLARITY

By Jeff Miller, February 10, 2021

“Spies are, by nature and necessity, pathological liars who strive to make their endgames justify their meanness.”

― Stewart Stafford

In 2014, researchers from U.C. Davis said that a 10.2% increase in water clarity in Lake Tahoe was caused by “the drought creating less runoff from surrounding developments”.

In 2016, researchers from U.C. Davis said that a 6% decrease in water clarity in Lake Tahoe was caused by “Warmer water and lack of snow”.

In 2017, researchers from U.C. Davis said that a 12% decrease in clarity in Lake Tahoe was due to “record snow and rain”.

In 2019, researchers from U.C. Davis said that a 17% increase in water clarity in Lake Tahoe was caused by “end of drought”.

Great positive changes are underway at every level of our reality. They began in earnest in 2012, and have been increasing in speed and magnitude. I began writing this series of articles, entitled “Positive Changes That Are Occurring”, in July of 2013.

These historically-unprecedented positive changes are being driven by many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices based on the work of Wilhelm Reich and Karl Hans Welz.

Since Don Croft first fabricated tactical Orgonite in 2000, its widespread, ongoing and ever-increasing distribution has been unknitting and transforming the ancient Death energy matrix built and expanded by our dark masters, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. And, as a result, the Ether is returning to its natural state of health and vitality.

One of those changes is that water quality and clarity are increasing exponentially regardless of geography.

Water quality and clarity vary directly with the health of the ether.

But I don’t want you to just take my word for it. We’re going to review all the data I’ve been able to compile on the subject over the past seven-plus years.

BY THE NUMBERS

Water clarity in Lake Tahoe increased 21.3% from 1997 to 2014, from 64.1 feet to 77.8 feet. That’s a baseline average annual increase in clarity of 1.25% per year over each of those seventeen years.

Water clarity in Lake Tahoe increased 3.12% from 1997 to 1998, from 64.1 feet to 66.1 feet. That’s 250% above the baseline average annual increase in clarity of 1.25% per year documented in Lake Tahoe from 1997 to 2014.

Water clarity in Lake Tahoe increased 4.4% from 1998 to 1999, from 66.1 feet to 69 feet. That’s 352% above the baseline average annual increase in clarity of 1.25% per year documented in Lake Tahoe from 1997 to 2014.

Water clarity in Lake Tahoe increased 9.3% from 2000 to 2001, from 67.3 feet to 73.6 feet. That’s 744% above the baseline average annual increase in clarity of 1.25% per year documented in Lake Tahoe from 1997 to 2014.

Water clarity in Lake Tahoe increased 6% from 2001 to 2002, from 73.6 feet to 78 feet. That’s 480% above the baseline average annual increase in clarity of 1.25% per year documented in Lake Tahoe from 1997 to 2014.

Water clarity in Lake Tahoe increased 3.6% from 2003 to 2004, from 71 feet to 73.6 feet. That’s 288% above the baseline average annual increase in clarity of 1.25% per year documented in Lake Tahoe from 1997 to 2014.

Water clarity in Caspian Lake, Vermont, increased 77% from 2006 to 2014, from 6.5 meters to 11.5 meters. That’s an unexplained near-doubling of water clarity in Caspian Lake in Vermont from 2006 to 2014.

That’s an average annual increase in water clarity of 9.6% per year over each of those eight years.

Water clarity in Lake Tahoe increased 14.9% from 2006 to 2014, from 67.7 feet to 77.8 feet.

Water clarity in Caspian Lake, Vermont increased 12.3% from 2006 to 2007, from 6.5 meters to 7.3 meters.

Water clarity in Caspian Lake, Vermont increased 1.4% from 2007 to 2008, from 7.3 meters to 7.4 meters.

Water clarity in Caspian Lake, Vermont increased 0% from 2008 to 2009, from 7.4 meters to 7.4 meters.

Water clarity in Caspian Lake, Vermont increased 12.1% from 2009 to 2010, from 7.4 meters to 8.3 meters.

Water clarity in Caspian Lake, Vermont increased 9.6% from 2010 to 2011, from 8.3 meters to 9.1 meters.

Water clarity in Lake Tahoe increased 7% from 2010 to 2011, from 64.4 feet to 68.9 feet. That’s 560% above the baseline average annual increase in clarity of 1.25% per year documented in Lake Tahoe from 1997 to 2014.

Water clarity in Caspian Lake, Vermont increased 26.3% from 2011 to 2014, from 9.1 meters to 11.5 meters. That’s an average annual increase in water clarity of 8.7% per year over each of those three years.

Water clarity in Lake Tahoe increased 13% from 2011 to 2014, from 68.9 feet to 77.8 feet

Water clarity in Lake Tahoe increased 9.2% from 2011 to 2012, from 68.9 feet to 75.3 feet. That’s 736% above the baseline average annual increase in clarity of 1.25% per year documented in Lake Tahoe from 1997 to 2014.

Water clarity in Lake Tahoe increased 10.2% from 2013 to 2014, from 70.2 feet to 77.8 feet. That’s the largest one-year increase in clarity in the data set, and it’s 816% above the baseline average annual increase in clarity of 1.25% per year documented in Lake Tahoe from 1997 to 2014.

U.C. Davis researchers attributed the largest increase in clarity in the history of Lake Tahoe to “the drought”.

It’s significant to note that, in 2014, Lake Tahoe’s clarity of 77.8 feet was second only to the historical high of 78 feet seen in 2002. 2002 is right when the literal forest of what we call “wireless communications infrastructure” was thrown up suddenly virtually overnight in every city, town and village on Earth.

Water clarity in Iowa’s storm lake was said to have “increased” from 2015 to 2018. DNR Fisheries Biologist Ben Wallace said “it’s likely a combination of all the improvement projects that we’ve done, things that you see goin’ on in the watershed, we’ve done some dredging, the city…Storm Lake has done some, uh, improvement, uh, projects, weather patterns and in lower rough fish numbers, and we can’t, uh, assign, like, one foot of clarity is from dredging, one foot of clarity is from our little Storm Lake project, likely, in any given year, they’re having a different effect, based on the weather and water levels and stuff, but that was the goal of doing all these works, that what we’ve invested so much in over these past fifteen to twenty years, it’s to improve water quality.”

Capradio.org said Lake Tahoe’s water clarity “jumped 10 feet” from 2017 to 2018. UC Davis researchers attributed the 14% increase, the largest in the history of the Lake, to “end of drought”.

Egg production at the hatchery on Storm Lake, Iowa increased 14% from 2016 to 2017.

In 2018, the water clarity increase in Minnesota’s Lake Winnibigoshish was said to be “rapid and astounding - more than doubling, from 6-7 feet to 14 feet and more now.” The clarity increase in Storm Lake was attributed to “zebra mussels”.

Water quality in Lake Tahoe increased 17% from 2018 to 2019, to the highest level in history. It was the biggest one-year improvement since they began keeping records there 50 years ago.

In 2019, water quality in the Chesapeake Bay was the highest since record keeping began.

In 2019, Thailand’s Mekong River suddenly became clear.

In 2020, the water in the canals of Venice suddenly became clear.