It's June 2021, and the populace has recognized that technology has been weaponized against it

JeffMiller · January 10, 2022, 11:54pm

"Sauron was become now a sorcerer of dreadful power, master of shadows and of phantoms, foul in wisdom, cruel in strength, misshaping what he touched, twisting what he ruled, lord of werewolves; his dominion was torment.”

From “The Silmarillion”, by J.R.R. Tolkien, 1977

[image]

(Jim Carrey as the Riddler in “Batman Forever”, 1995 - he’s taking in the brain waves his purpose-built set-top box has stolen from unwitting television viewers. They’re kidding, kidding!)

[image]

(The Internet in 1995)

“The shadow of that hyddeous strength, sax myle and more it is of length”

From “Ane Dialog”, by Sir David Lyndsay, describing the Tower of Babel, 1555 (The quote introduces C.S. Lewis’ “That Hideous Strength”, from 1945)

But suddenly the mirror went altogether dark, as dark as if a hole had opened in the world of sight, and Frodo looked into emptiness. In the black abyss there appeared a single Eye that slowly grew, until it filled nearly all the Mirror. So terrible was it that Frodo stood rooted, unable to cry out or to withdraw his gaze. The Eye was rimmed with fire, but was itself glazed, yellow as a cat’s, watchful and intent, and the black slit of its pupil opened on a pit, a window into nothing.

Then the Eye began to rove, searching this way and that; and Frodo knew with certainty and horror that among the many things that it sought he himself was one. But he also knew that it could not see him - not yet, not unless he willed it. The Ring that hung upon its chain about his neck grew heavy, heavier than a great stone, and his head was dragged downwards. The Mirror seemed to be growing hot and curls of steam were rising from the water. He was slipping forward…

‘I know what it is you last saw,’ she said; ‘for that is also in my mind. do not be afraid! But do not think that only by singing amid the trees, nor even by the slender arrows of elvenbows, is this land of Lothlórien maintained and defended against the Enemy. I say to you, Frodo, that even as I speak to you, I perceive the Dark Lord and know his mind, or all his mind that concerns the Elves. And he gropes ever to see me and my thought. But still the door is closed!’

From “The Fellowship of the Ring”, by J.R.R. Tolkien, 195

“He thought of the telescreen with its never-sleeping ear. They could spy upon you night and day, but if you kept your head you could still outwit them. With all their cleverness they had never mastered the secret of finding out what another human being was thinking. . . . Facts, at any rate, could not be kept hidden. They could be tracked down by inquiry, they could be squeezed out of you by torture. But if the object was not to stay alive but to stay human, what difference did it ultimately make? They could not alter your feelings; for that matter you could not alter them yourself, even if you wanted to. They could lay bare in the utmost detail everything that you had done or said or thought; but the inner heart, whose workings were mysterious even to yourself, remained impregnable.”

From “1984”, by George Orwell, 1949

“Now the Elves made many rings; but secretly Sauron made One Ring to rule all the others, and their power was bound up with it, to be subject wholly to it and to last only so long as it too should last. And much of the strength and will of Sauron passed into that One Ring; for the power of the Elven-rings was very great, and that which should govern them must be a thing of surpassing potency; and Sauron forged it in the Mountain of Fire in the Land of Shadow. And while he wore the One Ring he could perceive all the things that were done by means of the lesser rings, and he could see and govern the very thoughts of those that wore them.”

From “The Silmarillion”, by J.R.R. Tolkien, edited by Christopher Tolkien, 1977

[image]

Great positive changes are underway at every level of our reality. They began in earnest in 2012, and have been increasing in speed and magnitude. I began writing this series of articles, entitled “Positive Changes That Are Occurring”, in July of 2013.

These historically-unprecedented positive changes are being driven by many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices based on the work of Wilhelm Reich and Karl Hans Welz.

Since Don Croft first fabricated the first simple, inexpensive tactical Orgonite devices in 2000, their widespread, ongoing and ever-increasing distribution has been unknitting and transforming the ancient Death energy matrix built and expanded by our dark masters, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. And, as a result, the Ether is returning to its natural state of health and vitality.

So, while it’s not the most positive time right now in a number of ways, there are still gigantic positive changes taking place on a societal level that dwarf the negativities we’re currently experiencing. And one of them is that the populace has recognized that technology has been weaponized against it.

That’s because moral and mental health vary directly with that of the ether.

As kids, we played with walkie-talkies, and were amazed and thrilled for a minute, then put them aside.

[image]

The instant the “cell phone” appeared, I and many others clearly discerned it for the plague it is, simply because of the asshole factor. And that was without knowing the deadliness of the non-ionizing radiation driving the cell phone.

[image]

There was (and is) simply no reason to carry a communicator around with you, such as the ones they used in the old Star Trek television show. Now, a phaser you could send on stun and incapacitate asshole cell phone users in restaurants? That, my friend, is a technology I could get behind.

If a pre-cell-phone population in the midst of the barely-covert, international release of a State-fabricated weaponized pathogen suddenly had “smart” phones released upon it in turn, the negative impact of the phones would be seen to dwarf that of the engineered virus, whose Death rate is seen to be roughly that of the seasonal flu when exaggerated and outright-fabricated numbers are removed from the analysis.

This is cheering and inspiring, in that this chapter documents the demise of the wireless “cell” phone, which has been driving ruin and woe on innumerable levels for a solid twenty years. While the wildly-exaggerated woe created by the engineered virus is minuscule by comparison.

As everyone could see back when we were all in offices together, the amount of time employees spend on their smart phones during the work week accounts for $15.5 billion in lost productivity in the U.S.

Just looking at your smartphone makes you less intelligent. Smartphones have a “butterfly brain effect” on users that can cause mental blunders. The effect is measurable even when the phones are switched off, and is worse for those who are more dependent on their mobiles.

[image]

People who had their phones on the desk recorded a 10 per cent lower score than those who left them in a different room on operational span tasks, which measures working memory and focus. Those who kept their phones further out of sight in their pockets or their bags scored only slightly better than when phones were placed on desks.

The researchers found that the negative effect of having a phone within eyeshot was significantly greater among those who said they were dependent on their smartphones. Participants who had expressed sympathy with phrases such as “I would have trouble getting through a normal day without my cellphone” and “using my cellphone makes me feel happy” performed as well as others when their phone was in a different room, but worse when it was placed on their desk.

The study also found reaction speeds to be affected, with students who had their phone on the desk responding more sluggishly in high-pace tests.

It even found that phones can even distract users even when they are turned off and placed face down. Those with phones outside of the room “slightly outperformed” those with switched off devices.

The mere presence of smartphones damages cognitive capacity – even when the device is turned off. This is proof that there’s both a physical and a non-physical element to the destructive nature of these devices. I think it’s quite clear that they invite demonic incursion.

There is a significant relationship between Problematic Cell Phone Use and alcohol abuse.

There is a significant multiplicative interactive effect of phone addiction and depressive symptoms with alcohol use.

Distilled Alcohol is euphemistically referred to as “spirits” because it quite clearly invites demonic incursion. I learned that nugget from Don Croft. One of those things they don’t teach you in school.

Loren Brichter, who in 2009 designed the pull-to-refresh feature now used by many apps, said “Smartphones are useful tools, but they’re addictive. I regret the downsides.”

Chris Marcellino, who was hired by Apple to work on the iPhone in his early 20’s, is now in the final stages of retraining to be a neurosurgeon. He stresses he is no expert on addiction, but says he has picked up enough in his medical training to know that technologies can affect the same neurological pathways as gambling and drug use. “These are the same circuits that make people seek out food, comfort, heat, sex,” he says.

The mean-spirited Western materialist plays that there’s no spiritual element to the phenomenon, but rather “it’s a wiring thing”. It’s where the Tech magazine “Wired” takes it’s name from. As if your car’s wiring harness could “get broken in certain ways”.

In February 2015, a Chinese teenager chopped off their own hand in an attempt to cure their Internet addiction.

“Addiction” is a demon that is invited in. Sometimes those addiction demons are minor, and at others they are major.

In August 2018, Australia’s stopsmartmeters.com.au said “Victory! U.S. State of New Mexico Rejects Smart Meters”.

TECHNOLOGY IS ADDICTIVE - AND WOMEN ARE MORE ADDICTED TO TECHNOLOGY THAN MEN

“Demons are like obedient dogs; they come when they are called.”

- Remy de Gourmont

The prevalence rate of internet addiction among 1,100 mostly female Taiwanese polled was 10.6 percent. The addiction rate among females is 150% higher than that of males.

[image]

34% of teen girls ages 14-17 say they mostly go online using their cell phone, 10 percent higher than teen boys the same age. This is notable since boys and girls are equally likely to be smartphone owners.

Female college students spend an average of 10 hours a day on their cell phones, while male students spend nearly eight. Since the deadly effects of non-ionizing radiation are cumulative and dose dependent, those extra two hours are bell ringers, as you will see.

54% of US teens are addicted to their smartphones. The addiction rate among females is 150% higher than that of males.

Female college students spend an average of 10 hours a day on their cell phones, while male students spend nearly eight. Thus female college students spent 25% more time each day on their phones.

The number of mobile phone addicts increased 123% between March 2013 and March 2014. The increase was 10% higher among women than among men.

34% of teen girls ages 14-17 say they mostly go online using their cell phone, 10 percent higher than teen boys the same age. This is notable since boys and girls are equally likely to be smartphone owners.

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “unsure”. That’s why an article from April 2013 said that “researchers are still unsure why girls go online on their phones more than boys do”.

The prevalence rate of internet addiction among 1,100 mostly female Taiwanese polled was 10.6 percent.

Gender and five personality domains could significantly predict 13.5% of the scores on the Mobile Phone Problem Usage Scale [F(6,497) = 13.00, P < 0.001]. “Females, high extraverts, high neurotics, and low open-minded are liable to score higher on the scale [Table 2].”

The author of the article averred “One note of caution: It’s important to remember that Roberts’ study shows that most people who are “addicted” to their cell phones are primarily using them as a way to stay connected to other people. In a 2013 blog post for Psychology Today, psychology professor Ira Hyman, Ph.D., writes that researchers may just be observing the rise of a new norm in social interaction: immediate, hyper-connected and here to stay.

“Feeling a need to be socially connected hardly seems like an addiction to me,” Hyman writes.

An article from September 2014 said “Men sent the same amount of emails as women but spent less time doing so. Roberts said this indicated that men were sending “shorter, more utilitarian messages than their female counterparts.”

In 2014, 10% of U.S. adolescents were addicted to their phones. The addiction rate among females was 150% higher than among males. Just two years later, in 2016, 50% of U.S. teens felt addicted to their phones.

In a Chinese study from 2014, 21.3% of smart phone users were found to be addicted to their phones.

In 2016, a Chinese teenager tied her mother to a chair and starved her to death in revenge for sending her to an internet addiction boot camp.

The number of women who use their phones more than 6 hours a day is twice that of men who did the same.

In December 2015 “Females were reported to score higher on the problematic mobile phone use scale (Takao et al., 2009).”

TECHNOLOGY IS DEADLY - AND WOMEN ARE KILLED MORE OFTEN BY TECHNOLOGY BECAUSE THEY ARE THE MOST ADDICTED TO IT

“The more data you compile the clearer this will become and I think it’s worth pursuing but just broaching the subject is a pioneering effort.”

Don Croft to Jeff Miller, on technology driven suicide, 2017

ALCOHOLISM

There is a significant relationship between Problematic Cell Phone Use and alcohol abuse.

There is a significant multiplicative interactive effect of phone addiction and depressive symptoms with alcohol use.

Smartphone adoption in the US strongest among older people.

A 2016 study found that women are more prone to smartphone addiction than men.

A 2017 study found an alarming rise in hard drinking and alcohol abuse, especially in women and older Americans.

ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE AND PARKINSON’S DISEASE

A study of Chinese adults ages 65 and older showed that living in urban areas later in life is associated with better initial cognitive status but a faster rate of cognitive decline.

It’s the higher level of Death energy in the ether in urban areas that drives those numbers. Moral and mental health vary directly with that of the subject’s etheric environment.

Alzheimer’s deaths increased 54.5% from 1999 to 2014.

The age-adjusted death rate from Alzheimer’s disease increased by 39 percent from 2000 through 2010 in the United States.

In 2002, just four years after the literal forest of “wireless communication” infrastructure sprang up virtually overnight in all the nations, neurosurgeon and researcher Dr. Leif Salford exposed over 1600 experimental animals to low level microwave radiation. His results were consistent and worrisome: microwave radiation caused the blood-brain barrier to leak.

Dr. Salford repeated the experiment in 2003 on 32 additional animals; they waited this time 8 weeks before “sacrificing them”–and found “up to two percent of the neurons in all areas of the brain were shrunken and degenerated.” Dr. Salford called the potential implications ‘terrifying’.”

That same year, in February 2003, BBC News said “Cell Phones ‘May Trigger Alzheimer’s Disease’”

The article says “The rats were exposed to two hours of radiation, equivalent to that emitted by mobile phones. Their brains were examined under a microscope 50 days later. The researchers found that rats which had been exposed to medium and high levels of radiation had an abundance of dead brain cells.”

Can you see how “an ABUNDANCE of dead brain cells” is general? Can you see how they used a dopamine-triggering positive word, “abundance”, to describe the only-generally-described percentage of cell-phone-killed brain cells?

Two hours! How do you think your brain is doing after years of exposure to a toxin that is cumulative and dose-dependent?

What makes that BBC story really impactful is this headline from WebMD from January 2010, just seven years later: “Can Cell Phones Help Fight Alzheimer’s***?***”

Smart phone use drives Alzheimer’s disease. We know that blood-brain barrier leakage is the driver of Alzheimer’s Disease:

The words “mystery“, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything.

That’s why a Newsweek article from January 2000 is headlined “Alzheimer’s Unlocking The Mystery”.

In 2005, the National Institute of Health said “We hypothesize that BBB dysfunction may contribute to the development of overlapping and disabling cerebrovascular conditions that include microvascular hemorrhage and dementia.”

Can you see how “blood brain barrier DYSFUNCTION” is general? They’re talking specifically about leakage across the blood brain barrier.

The words “mystery“, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why a National Institute of Health article from July 2010 is headlined “Inside the Brain: Unraveling the Mystery of Alzheimer’s Disease”.

And it’s also why a constantcontact.com article from February 2013 is headlined “The Only Predictable Aspect of Alzheimer’s Is Its Baffling Unpredictability!”

And it is, further, why a Florida State University article from August 2014 is headlined “NIH grant may help unlock Alzheimer’s mystery”.

And it is, ad nauseam why a healthcaredailyonline.com article from February 2016 says “Study: Scientists Baffled as Risk of Dementia Declining”.

Can you see how the author put “Study” on the front end? That’s to give the subconscious of the reader the green light to say “oh, but that was just one study!” The propagandist knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.

What makes the claim of only-generally-described “declining” Alzheimer’s rates so brazen is the fact that Alzheimer’s deaths increased 54.5% from 1999 to 2014. And that the age-adjusted death rate from Alzheimer’s disease in the United States increased by 39% from 2000 through 2010.

Healthcare Daily Online is a State propaganda organ, using conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty. I’ve just exposed their duplicity through what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.

The words “mystery“, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything.

In May 2016, Science Daily said “Leaky blood-brain barrier linked to Alzheimer’s disease.”

We know, further, that microwave radiation causes the Blood-Brain Barrier to leak:

"Dr. Leif Salford exposed over 1600 experimental animals to low level microwave radiation. Their results were consistent and worrisome: microwave radiation. . …caused the blood-brain barrier . . .to leak.” (It was repeated in 2003 on 32 additional animals; they waited this time 8 weeks before “sacrificing them”–and found “up to two percent of the neurons in all areas of the brain were shrunken and degenerated. ”Dr. Salford, says Firstenberg, called the “potential implications ‘terrifying.”

If Alzheimer’s disease is caused by a leaky blood brain barrier, and microwave radiation causes the blood brain barrier to leak, then the purportedly-harmless microwave radiation causes Alzheimer’s.

The words “mystery“, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why a Live Science article from September 2016 described “6 Big Mysteries of Alzheimer’s Disease”.

And it’s also why a Financial Times article from November 2016 is headlined “Plaques, tangles and the mystery of Alzheimer’s disease”.

And it is, further, why a statnews.com article from April 2017 widened its eyes to simulate honesty and asked “Are oligomers the missing piece of the amyloid puzzle to open a path for Alzheimer’s drugs***?***”

And it it, yet again, why a CBS Philly article from May 2017 said “Medical Researchers Still Puzzled On Alzheimer’s”.

And it is still, yet again, why an ourweekly.com article from May 2017 said “Alzheimer’s disease continues to baffle neuroscientists around the world.”

We live in a world where the NPR-addicted can affirm to themselves, en masse, that neuroscientists are unaware that, in Alzheimer’s disease, “(The blood-brain barrier) becomes leaky, letting in undesirable agents and hindering the clearing of the amyloid” (as documented in the Journal of the American Medical Association). And that those same neuroscientists are unaware that it is purportedly-harmless microwave radiation that causes the blood brain barrier to leak, and that it also kills and shrivels brain cells.

While that same cadre of citizens steadfastly refuses to notice or examine the obvious use of repetitive linguistic techniques used by the Controlled press in all the nations, regardless of the language.

Yet, if it is pointed out, the point of view may change, may it not?

In 2017, the Journal of the American Medical Association said, re: Alzheimer’s: “(The blood-brain barrier) becomes leaky, letting in undesirable agents and hindering the clearing of the amyloid.”

If non-ionizing radiation causes the blood-brain barrier to leak, and a leaking blood-brain barrier drives Alzheimer’s disease, then so-called “Smart” phones cause Alzheimer’s disease.

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why a VOA News article from April 2009 is headlined “Parkinson’s Disease: A Movement Disorder, and a Mystery of the Brain”.

VOA News is claiming with a straight face that neither they nor anyone else know that the delayed effects of brain radiation present as Parkinsonism. They’re a State propaganda outlet, doing what it can to blunt rapidly rising awareness that non-ionizing radiation from “Technology” is driving exponential increases in neurodegenerative disease.

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why a Nature Medicine article from May 2010 is headlined “Missing pieces in the Parkinson’s disease puzzle”.

They’re brazenly claiming that neither they nor anyone else knows that the delayed effects of brain radiation present as Parkinsonism.

“Nature Medicine” is a State propaganda outlet, doing what it can to blunt rapidly rising awareness that non-ionizing radiation from “Technology” is driving exponential increases in neurodegenerative disease.

In January 2010, WebMD widened its eyes to simulate honesty and brazenly asked “Can Cell Phones Help Fight Alzheimer’s***?***”

WebMD is a Mouthpiece of the State, using conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty to suggest that they don’t know that non-ionizing radiation from so-called “smart” phones causes the blood-brain barrier to leak, letting in undesirable agents and hindering the clearing of the amyloid.

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why, in May 2013, Dr. Sanjay Gupta widened his eyes to simulate honesty and said that he was “Piecing Together the Parkinson’s Puzzle”.

[image]

(Dr. Sanjay Gupta, of “Health Matters”

Dr. Sanjay Gupta is a nattily-dressed generational Satanist, using his duplicitously-named “Health Matters” website to aver that, as a Medical Doctor, he’s somehow unaware of the delayed effects of brain radiation present as Parkinsonism.

Not all M.D.’s are generational Satanists, of course. But those who profess to be “puzzled” by Parkinson’s disease certainly are. You can’t recognize them by the way they dress, other than the lurid lightning-rod Satanists like Marilyn Manson. We’re able to finger Sanjay only based on his use of the code word “puzzle”.

He and the rest of his genetically-relate crime family are using conscious deception with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty to fleece the rubes in every city, town and village on Earth. You know them dimly as “the One Percent”.

Trying to hold back awareness of the great, intentionally-released plague upon humanity that is technology, in July 2013 the National Institute of Health narrowed its eyes and asked “Can radiation be linked to Parkinson’s***?***”

That’s because the first rule of politics is “deny, deny, deny”.

In 2015, PubMed feigned honesty and asked “Should we irradiate a brain tumor in a patient with parkinsonism?” Their resounding answer? “Functional radiosurgery for management of refractory tremor in PD patients is safe and effective.” They leave out “until the delayed effects of brain radiation present as Parkinsonism.

PubMed is using conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with compete honesty. There a State propaganda organ, doing what it can to blunt rapidly rising awareness that non-ionizing radiation from “Technology” is driving exponential increases in neurodegenerative disease.

In December 2015, nbc.com said “Common Prostate Cancer Treatment May Double Risk for Alzheimer’s”.

Where NBC hedged with the general “COMMON prostate cancer treatment” to avoid saying “Radiation treatments for prostate cancer double risk for Alzheimer’s”.

They also don’t mention that the reason it doubles is because both ionizing and non-ionizing radiation causes the blood-brain barrier to leak, letting in undesirable agents and hindering the clearing of the amyloid.

The words “mystery“, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything:

That’s why a healthcaredailyonline.com article from February 2016 is headlined “Study: Scientists Baffledas Risk of Dementia Declining”.

The author put “Study” on the front end to give the subconscious of the reader the green light to say “oh, but that was just one study!” The propagandist knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.

They have to say “baffled” because it’s such gigantic, grotesque lie. In that the age-adjusted death rate from Alzheimer’s disease in the United States increased by 39 percent from 2000 through 2010.

Parkinson’s disease is caused by non-ionizing radiation, particularly from so-called “smart” phones. That’s why an mdabstracts.org article from July 2016 is entitled “Delayed effects of brain radiation presenting as parkinsonism”.

In July 2016, the National Institute of Health brazenly asked “Can Radiation From CT Scans AlleviateSymptoms Of Alzheimer’s***?***” Some subset of wholly-credulous, mouth-breathing rubes will believe that the NIH has no idea that radiation from Technology causes the blood-brain barrier to leak, letting in undesirable agents and hindering the clearing of the amyloid, and that the NIH does not know that radiation treatments for prostate cancer double the risk for Alzheimer’s.

The National Institute of Health knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.

In October 2016, Science Daily spoke of “In October 2016, Science Daily spoke of “Concern that radiation may contribute to development of Alzheimer’s”.

They’re pretending that they just got the memo from 2003 about that radiation from Technology causes the blood-brain barrier to leak, letting in undesirable agents and hindering the clearing of the amyloid, and they’re pretending that they don’t know that radiation treatments for prostate cancer double the risk for Alzheimer’s.

They’re a State propaganda organ, using conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty. And the rubes eat it right up, in every city, town and village on Earth.

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why a Financial Times article from November 2016 is headlined “Plaques, tangles and the mystery of Alzheimer’s disease”.

The Financial Times is a State propaganda outlet, using conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty to suggest that neither they nor anyone else has any idea that non-ionizing microwave radiation from Technology causes the blood-brain barrier to leak, letting in undesirable agents and hindering the clearing of the amyloid.

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why a USA Today article from January 2017 is headlined “Trying to solve the Alzheimer’s puzzle”.

One of the nation’s largest newspapers is claiming with a straight face neither they nor anyone else know that non-ionizing microwave radiation causes the blood-brain barrier to leak, letting in undesirable agents and hindering the clearing of the amyloid. They’re using conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.

USA Today is an organ of the controlled press, doing what it can to blunt rapidly rising awareness that non-ionizing radiation from “Technology” is driving exponential increases in neurodegenerative disease.

An article from theactuary.com from March 2017 asked “Is dementia really on the rise?”

The actuary.com is a State propaganda outlet, using conscious deception with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty to ask if a 50% increase in Alzheimer’s deaths in the U.S. from 1999 to 2014 did, in fact take place.

In May 2017, Live Science said “Deaths from Alzheimer’s disease are on the rise in the United States”.

They used “rise” because it’s general, and because it’s softer than “increase”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black-Sun cult that’s ruled things in all the nations, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.

In May 2017, the CDC reported that Alzheimer’s deaths were “skyrocketing”, but averred that “It didn’t happen in one year, it’s been a steady trend over time”.

Where “skyrocketing”, while lurid, is general. As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda. The CDC is trying to blunt your understanding of the huge scope of the increase, and also falsely asserting that hasn’t been increasing exponentially in recent years.

It’s an example of a Mouthpiece of the State using conscious deception with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty to say that they don’t know that microwave radiation causes the blood-brain barrier to leak, letting in undesirable agents and hindering the clearing of the amyloid.

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything.

That’s why a University of Southern California article from May 2017 said “Science without borders is needed to solve the mystery of Alzheimer’s”.

USC is pretending not to know that technology is driving exponential increases in neurodegenerative disease, including Alzheimer’s. It’s an example of the use of conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why a WBHI Think Tank article from May 2017 is entitled “ Alzheimer’s disease continues to baffle scientists around the world”.

The Women’s Brain Health Institute is a Mouthpiece of the State, claiming with a straight face that neither they nor any scientist on Earth knows that microwave radiation causes the blood-brain barrier to leak, letting in undesirable agents and hindering the clearing of the amyloid. They’re using conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why an “In the Pipeline” article from September 2017 is entitled “A New Piece of the Parkinson’s Puzzle.”

“In the Pipeline” is a State propaganda outlet, doing what it can to blunt rapidly rising awareness that non-ionizing radiation from “Technology” is driving exponential increases in neurodegenerative disease.

But don’t try presenting all this to a committed Coincidence Theorist as proof that there’s Some Big Conspiracy.

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why, in November 2017, Bryn Mawr College published an article entitled “Parkinson’s Disease: Unraveling the Mystery.”

A major educational institution is claiming with a straight face that they don’t know that they don’t know that the delayed effects of brain radiation present as Parkinsonism.

They’re a Mouthpiece of the State, using conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why in November 2017 the Sanger Institute spoke of “Alzheimer’s Disease: The puzzle we’re so desperate to solve”.

An esteemed genomic research institute in the U.K. is claiming with a straight face that they don’t know that microwave radiation causes the blood-brain barrier to leak, letting in undesirable agents and hindering the clearing of the amyloid. They’re using conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.

I must underscore that it is not just so-called “smart” phones that cause Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease, despite the fact that they are the most efficient Death energy delivery vehicle yet devised. The Death energy technology also includes microwave Television transmissions, and microwave oven emissions, high tension power lines, and countless other sources. And that’s not even mentioning the grandaddy of them all, which is good old fashioned ionizing radiation.

[image]

(Nursing home for Alzheimer’s patients)

It doesn’t matter where the radiation comes from, or what kind of radiation it is. The damage from radiation is cumulative and dose-dependent.

ANXIETY, DEPRESSION AND MENTAL ILLNESS

There is a strong correlation a strong correlation was between internet addiction and anxiety, stress, and depression.

Living in cities is associated with an almost 40% higher risk of depression, over 20% more anxiety, and double the risk of schizophrenia.

Long hours of mobile phone use, particularly 2 hours or more, are related to depression. Women aged 45-54 suffer more stress and depression than all other age groups.

54% of US teens are addicted to their smartphones. The addiction rate among females is 150% higher than that of males.

Female college students spend an average of 10 hours a day on their cell phones, while male students spend nearly eight. Thus female college students spent 25% more time each day on their phones.

The number of women who use their phones more than 6 hours a day is twice that of men who did the same.

34% of teen girls ages 14-17 say they mostly go online using their cell phone, 10 percent higher than teen boys the same age. This is notable since boys and girls are equally likely to be smartphone owners.

Teens who reported a Major Depressive Episode in the previous 12 months increased 37% from 2005 to 2013, from 8.7% to 11.5%. Three-fourths of those depressed teens were girls.

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “unsure”. That’s why an article from April 2013 said that “researchers are still unsure why girls go online on their phones more than boys do”.

The prevalence rate of internet addiction among 1,100 mostly female Taiwanese polled was 10.6 percent.

Gender and five personality domains could significantly predict 13.5% of the scores on the Mobile Phone Problem Usage Scale [F(6,497) = 13.00, P < 0.001]. “Females, high extraverts, high neurotics, and low open-minded are liable to score higher on the scale [Table 2].”

The author of the article averred “One note of caution: It’s important to remember that Roberts’ study shows that most people who are “addicted” to their cell phones are primarily using them as a way to stay connected to other people. In a 2013 blog post for Psychology Today, psychology professor Ira Hyman, Ph.D., writes that researchers may just be observing the rise of a new norm in social interaction: immediate, hyper-connected and here to stay.

“Feeling a need to be socially connected hardly seems like an addiction to me,” Hyman writes.

An article from September 2014 said “Men sent the same amount of emails as women but spent less time doing so. Roberts said this indicated that men were sending “shorter, more utilitarian messages than their female counterparts.”

The number of mobile phone addicts increased 123% between March 2013 and March 2014. The increase was 10% higher among women than among men.

[image]

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why a Core Economics article from May 2013 is headlined “The rise in Mental Health Problems: a puzzle”.

They used “rise” in the headline because it’s general. They’re trying to blunt your perception of scope of the technology-driven increase in mental illness. They also used it because it’s softer than “increase”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black-Sun cult that’s ruled things in all the nations all the way back to Babylon, and before.

Core Economics is a State-sponsored propaganda outlet, using conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty to assert that they have no idea that technology is driving an exponential increase in depression and mental illness.

The number of mobile phone addicts increased 123% between March 2013 and March 2014. The increase was 10% higher among women than among men.

In 2014, 10% of U.S. adolescents were addicted to their phones. The addiction rate among females was 150% higher than among males. Just two years later, in 2016, 50% of U.S. teens felt addicted to their phones.

In a Chinese study from 2014, 21.3% of smart phone users were found to be addicted to their phones. In 2016, a Chinese teenager tied her mother to a chair and starved her to death in revenge for sending her to an internet addiction boot camp.

An article from 2015 from the National Institute of Health widened its eyes to simulate honesty, wrung its hands and asked “Why is depression more prevalent in women?”

In December 2015 “Females were reported to score higher on the problematic mobile phone use scale (Takao et al., 2009).”

In 2017, depression was said to be “worsening” in teens, especially girls.

BRAIN CANCER, BRAIN TUMORS, LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA

CT scans triple the risk of brain cancer and leukemia. The induction of leukemia by ionizing radiation has been well documented in humans and laboratory animals. However, non-Ionizing radiation from Technology is also driving an exponential increase in Leukemia and Lymphatic cancer, regardless of geography. And, while they are the most efficient Death energy delivery vehicle yet devised, that non-ionizing radiation is not just from cell phones. It also includes microwave Television transmissions, and microwave oven emissions, high tension power lines, and countless other sources. It’s a long list.

Malignant brain tumors in the U.K. increased 140% - more than doubled – from 1995 to 2016.

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why a Journal of the National Cancer Institute article from April 2001 is headlined Lymphoma Rate Rise Continues to Baffle Researchers.”

The National Cancer Institute is using conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty to suggest that neither they nor anyone else realizes that non-ionizing radiation from Technology is driving exponentially increasing levels of Leukemia and Lymphatic cancer.

Glioblastomas increased 22% to 45% in the U.S. and Europe from 2002 to 2017, while rates of all other brain tumors decreased.

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “unusual”. That’s why the number of Swedes under age 70 who died of a brain tumor “of an unknown nature” increased 1,071% from 2008 and 2013.

The number of patients reported dead of brain tumors with a confirmed diagnosis “declined” during the same period. Here you can see the generational Satanist Medical Establishment describing phone-driven brain tumors as “brain tumor of an unknown nature”, and removing the data from the national cancer registry.

[image]

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why a California Health Report article from June 2012 is headlined “Increase in childhood leukemia a puzzle”.

A study in 2015 showed cellphone radiation causes cancer.

In November 2015, ascopost.com widened its eyes to simulate honesty and sowed the seed of doubt by asking “Does Low-Dose Radiation Cause Leukemia***?***”

The propagandist knows that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.

Buried in the probably-unread article below, were learn “It is more likely than not that low doses of ionizing radiation increase the risk of leukemia”.

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why the article goes on to say that “in A-bomb survivors, the relative risks of developing acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL; relative risk [RR] = 2.7), acute myeloid leukemia (AML; RR = 2.1), and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML; RR = 2.8) were markedly increased. Curiously, past studies reported neither an increased risk of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in A-bomb survivors nor in many other radiation-related settings.”

The study showed a near-tripling of leukemia among Atomic bomb survivors. The author used the key code word “curiously” because all of the past studies were by performed, written and published by generational Satanist insiders committed to covering up the fact that radiation drives Leukemia. If they hadn’t used their until-now secret code (mystery, baffled, puzzled, curious), I probably would have had a harder time catching them at it.

You can’t recognize generational Satanists by their appearance, beyond the occasional secret hand sign, or in theatrically-obvious lighting rods like Marilyn Manson. You can only recognize them by their codified and highly-repetitive propaganda, which they figured the rubes would never catch onto.

Three reviews of the research on cell phone use and brain tumor risk were published in peer-reviewed journals in 2017. Each of these studies reports a statistically significant relationship between cell phone use of ten or more years and brain tumor risk, especially on the side of the head where the cell phone was predominantly placed during phone calls (i.e., ipsilateral use).

In 2017, it was shown that the California government buried the truth about cell phone radiation causing brain cancer.

In April 2017, in a landmark ruling, an Italian Court found that cancer was linked to cellphone use.

In November 2017, the American Cancer Society altered its advice about mobile phone use and urged people to limit the time the phones are held to the head, because NTP researchers discovered that brain tumours had developed in the male rats, and that DNA in their brains had been damaged, “something that sceptics have said was not biologically possible.”

Dr Anthony B Miller, a professor at the Dalla Lana School of Public Health at the University of Toronto said “the evidence indicating wireless is carcinogenic has increased and can no longer be ignored.”

[image]

In December 2017, Forbes widened its eyes to simulate honesty and asked “Are Brain Cancer Rates Increasing, And Do Changes Relate To Cell Phone Use”.

In the headline, Forbes questioned if brain cancer rates were increasing, to lead off an article documenting a doubling to tripling of brain cancer documented in the body text below.

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “vexed”. That’s why the article goes on to say “For more than 20 years there has been public concern regarding the safety of cell phones. Examining changes in brain cancer rates in different countries over the past decades can help provide an answer to this vexed question.”

Where “CHANGES in brain cancer rates” is a general hedge put forward to obscure a two-to-threefold increase in brain cancer described lower in the article.

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “little is known”.

That’s why the article goes on to say “A lesson in how easy it is to be misled - Little is known about the causes of brain cancer and brain tumors. Exposure to ionizing radiation (X-rays) and certain rare genetic syndromes have been identified as causes, but these account for only a small proportion of cases.”

The author’s name is Geoffrey Kabat. Here’s his picture:

[image]

(Geoffrey Kabat)

I’ve included it so you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.

Remember, Geoff says “little is known” about the causes of brain cancer and brain tumors.

It doesn’t matter where the radiation comes from, or what form it takes. The damage from radiation of any kind is cumulative and dose-dependent.

BREAST CANCER

Breast cancer increased 25% from 1975 to 2017.

White women have the highest rate of breast cancer.

Women exposed to high levels of “outdoor blue light at night” had a 150% higher risk of developing breast cancer. Where “outdoor blue light at night” is Mil-Speak for “purportedly-harmless non-ionizing radiation”.

54% of US teens are addicted to their smartphones. The addiction rate among females is 150% higher than that of males.

34% of teen girls ages 14-17 say they mostly go online using their cell phone, 10 percent higher than teen boys the same age. This is notable since boys and girls are equally likely to be smartphone owners.

The number of women who use their phones more than 6 hours a day is twice that of men who did the same.

Female college students spend an average of 10 hours a day on their cell phones, while male students spend nearly eight. Thus female college students spent 25% more time each day on their phones.

In 1990, the National Institute of Health said “There is no evidence that radiogenic breast cancers appear during the first 10 years following exposure, but after this time the number of such cancers appears to increase rapidly. On the relative-risk scale, the data suggest that the incidence peaks at 15 to 20 years after exposure and the mortality about 5 years later. Observations to date indicate that the absolute risk continues to increase until 50 but may decrease at older ages.”

It takes about ten years for breast cancer to show up after someone has been irradiated by their phone, or medical scans, or “for your safety” weapons scans at airports, to name only three of innumerable sources of purportedly-harmless non-ionizing radiation.

In August 2004, the National Institute of Health said described “Radiation-induced malignancies followingradiotherapy for breast cancer”.

That’s Mil-speak for “the radiation used to treat breast cancer is in fact causing that cancer.”

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “unsure”. That’s why an article from April 2013 said that “researchers are still unsure why girls go online on their phones more than boys do”.

The prevalence rate of internet addiction among 1,100 mostly female Taiwanese polled was 10.6 percent.

Gender and five personality domains could significantly predict 13.5% of the scores on the Mobile Phone Problem Usage Scale [F(6,497) = 13.00, P < 0.001]. “Females, high extraverts, high neurotics, and low open-minded are liable to score higher on the scale [Table 2].”

The author of the article averred “One note of caution: It’s important to remember that Roberts’ study shows that most people who are “addicted” to their cell phones are primarily using them as a way to stay connected to other people.

In a 2013 blog post for Psychology Today, psychology professor Ira Hyman, Ph.D., writes that researchers may just be observing the rise of a new norm in social interaction: immediate, hyper-connected and here to stay.

“Feeling a need to be socially connected hardly seems like an addiction to me,” Hyman writes.

The number of mobile phone addicts increased 123% between March 2013 and March 2014. The increase was 10% higher among women than among men.

In 2014, 10% of U.S. adolescents were addicted to their phones. The addiction rate among females was 150% higher than among males. Just two years later, in 2016, 50% of U.S. teens felt addicted to their phones.

In a Chinese study from 2014, 21.3% of smart phone users were found to be addicted to their phones. In 2016, a Chinese teenager tied her mother to a chair and starved her to death in revenge for sending her to an internet addiction boot camp.

An article from September 2014 said “Men sent the same amount of emails as women but spent less time doing so. Roberts said this indicated that men were sending “shorter, more utilitarian messages than their female counterparts.”

A study in 2015 showed cellphone radiation causes cancer.

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why an IFLScience article from 2017 is headlined “The Mystery Of Breast Cancer”.

They’re using conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty that they have no idea that non-ionizing radiation from so-called “smart” phones is driving an exponential increase in breast cancer. IFLScience is a State propaganda outlet, doing what it can to support the international news blackout that is in place on this subject.

In December 2015 “Females were reported to score higher on the problematic mobile phone use scale (Takao et al., 2009).”

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why a Discover Magazine article from April 2017 is entitled “The Mystery of Breast Cancer’s Cause”.

They’re using conscious deception with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty that they have no idea that non-ionizing radiation from so-called “smart” phones is driving an exponential increase in breast cancer.

Discover is a State propaganda organ, doing what it can to support the international news blackout that is in place on this subject.

In April 2017, in a landmark ruling, an Italian Court found that cancer was linked to cellphone use.

Non-Ionizing radiation from Technology is driving an exponential increase in breast cancer, regardless of geography. And, while they are the most efficient Death energy delivery vehicle yet devised, its not just from cell phones. It also includes microwave Television transmissions, and microwave oven emissions, high tension power lines, and countless other sources. It’s a long list, that also includes good old fashioned ionizing radiation.

It doesn’t matter what kind of radiation it is. The damage from radiation is cumulative and dose-dependent.

CANCER

In 2011, the World Health Organization classified mobile phone radiation as a group 2B carcinogen, which means it is possibly harmful to humans.

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why a New York Times article from June 1991 is headlined “Study Finds Mysterious Rise In Childhood Cancer Rate”.

Cancer increased 40% in young people in the U.K. from 2000 to 2016. 2000 was right when the literal forest of what is purported merely to be “communication infrastructure” was thrown up suddenly in all the nations. Using a generalization and a half-truth, the U.K.’s Telegraph said “Modern life is killing our children”.

From 2009 to 2014, new cancer cases of all types increased more than 10%. That’s because purportedly harmless non-ionizing radiation from Technology, primarily “smart” phones, causes cancer.

The number of mobile phone addicts increased 123% between March 2013 and March 2014. The increase was 10% higher among women than among men.

A study in 2015 showed cellphone radiation causes cancer.

In December 2016, Medical Daily widened its eyes to simulate honesty, wrung its hands and asked “WhyAre Cancer Rates Increasing?”.

In January 2017, superfoodly.com narrowed its eyes bitterly and asked “Do Cell Phones & WiFi Cause Cancer***?*** Maybe”

In April 2017, in a landmark ruling, an Italian Court found that cancer was linked to cellphone use.

COLON CANCER

Purportedly-harmless non-Ionizing radiation from Technology is driving an exponential increase in Colon cancer, regardless of geography. And, while they are the most efficient Death energy delivery vehicle yet devised, its not just from cell phones. It also includes microwave Television transmissions, and microwave oven emissions, high tension power lines, and countless other sources. It’s a long list, that also includes good old fashioned ionizing radiation.

Colon cancer deaths in the U.S. decreased 38% from 1970 to 2004.

Colon cancer deaths in the U.S. increased 9.3% from 2004 to 2014, but only among whites. The overall rates for colorectal cancer have been going down for several decades with the exception of one group; young white patients.

Bowel cancer rates among younger people in the U.K. increased 48% from 2004 to 2014. 2004 was when all the young white patients got their first cell phones and put them in their back pockets over their colons.

It’s obviously not just non-ionizing radiation. In 2008, the National Institute of Health documented “Increased risk of colon cancer after external radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

In 2011, the World Health Organization classified mobile phone radiation as a group 2B carcinogen, which means it is possibly harmful to humans.

A study in 2015 showed cellphone radiation causes cancer.

In April 2017, in a landmark ruling, an Italian Court found that cancer was linked to cellphone use.

In April 2017, medicalxpress.com said New Zealand’s colorectal cancer rates among young adults were “on the rise”.

They used “rise” because it’s general. As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda. The author is blunting specific insight into the magnitude of the technology-driven increase in colon cancer. “Rise” is also used because it’s softer than “increase”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black-Sun cult that’s ruled things in all the nations, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.

In August 2017, CNN said colon and rectal cancer deaths were “on the rise, study says”.

They used “rise” because it’s general. As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda. The author is blunting specific insight into the magnitude of the technology-driven increase in colon cancer. “Rise” is also used because it’s softer than “increase”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black-Sun cult that’s ruled things in all the nations, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.

The author tacked the snide “study says” on the end to give the subconscious of the reader the green light to say “oh, but that was just one study!” or, “oh, you can make those studies say anything!”

The propagandist knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.

In August 2017 the New York Times said “More Young People Are Dying of Colon Cancer.”

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “stunned”.

They used “more” because it’s general. As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda. The author is blunting specific insight into the magnitude of the technology-driven increase in colon cancer.

In August 2017, the Washington Post said “Death rates from colon cancer are increasing for white Americans under 55”.

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “startled”. That’s why the article goes on to say: “Earlier this year, researcher Rebecca Siegel of the American Cancer Society published a startling report showing that colon and rectal cancer incidence is rising among Gen X and millennials while falling in older generations.”

Where they used “rising” because it’s softer than “increasing”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black-Sun cult that’s ruled things in all the nations, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. But the most important reason that they used it is because it is general. They’re doing everything they can to blunt and defray awareness into the wider trend I’m documenting here.

They used the word “falling” because it’s it’s softer than “dropping”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer. But the main reason it was used is because it’s general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.

The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “perplexed”. That’s why the article goes on to say “On Tuesday, after delving further into the data, she and her co-authors identified “a true and perplexing escalation in disease occurrence.” In a paper in JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association, they report that deaths from colorectal cancer are increasing for young and middle-aged Americans — though the increase appears, at least so far, to be confined to white men and women.”

Where the author from the Trusted Authority Figure that is the Washington Post is pretending to be “perplexed” that colon cancer is increasing only in the group with the phone in their back pocket over their colon.

INSOMNIA

In January 2011, bmcpublichealth.com published “Mobile phone use and stress, sleep disturbances, and symptoms of depression among young adults - a prospective cohort study“, which said “High frequency of mobile phone use at baseline was a risk factor for mental health outcomes at 1-year follow-up among the young adults”.

There is a strong correlation between internet addiction and insomnia.

Long hours of mobile phone use are associated with insomnia, particularly in students using mobile phones for 5 hours or more a day.

54% of US teens are addicted to their smartphones. The addiction rate among females is 150% higher than that of males.

Female college students spend an average of 10 hours a day on their cell phones, while male students spend nearly eight. Thus female college students spent 25% more time each day on their phones.

34% of teen girls ages 14-17 say they mostly go online using their cell phone, 10 percent higher than teen boys the same age. This is notable since boys and girls are equally likely to be smartphone owners.

The number of women who use their phones more than 6 hours a day is twice that of men who did the same.

A study from 2006 found that females have a 41% higher risk of Insomnia than males. The trend of female predisposition was consistent and progressive across age, with more significance in the elderly. Smartphone adoption in the US strongest among older people. An article from April 2012 said “Insomnia Affects Women Slightly More Than Men”.