THE BREAKING OF THE GREAT ARTIFICIAL DROUGHT - CHINA
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. Two of those variants are “culprits” and “extreme”. That’s why a Phys.org article from In January 2017, Phys.org said “Scientists find culprits for extreme rainfall over Yangtze River in May”.
The article explains: “In May 2016, an extreme rainfall occurred in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River Valley. The area averaged anomaly of total precipitation over the region (117°-121°E, 26°-34°N) was the third wettest on record since 1961. There were 25 stations that broke 56-year maximum records. Meanwhile, the 2015-16 El Niño event was regarded as one of the strongest El Niño events in recorded history, bringing heavy rains and drought around the world.”
Where “El Nino”, a quasi-mythical, magical spot of slightly warmer than normal spot of water in the great vastness of the Pacific Ocean is straight-fadedly asserted to be the driver of the highest rainfall in history in China, but, via unexplained mechanism, also creates droughts elsewhere! Is there anything it can’t do?
While the author carefully omits mention of the record rainfall that is taking place in all the nations, regardless of geography. That’s an example of a propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
Li Chunxiang, the first author of the study, goes on to boldly and brazenly say “However, on smaller spatial scales we find that anthropogenic forcing has likely played a role in increasing the risk of extreme rainfall to the north of the Yangtze and decreasing it to the south."
Where the ensheepled reader gobbles down the doublethink that global warming both increases and decreases rainfall. Did it play a role, or did it not? What sort of role did it play, if so? Increasing to what extent? All the generalities of a desperately hedging Mouthpiece of the State.
Li is an Illuminist bloodline.
(David Rockefeller visits with his friend Li Chiang, one of Red China’s Government Trade Officials. From Fritz Springmeier’s “Bloodlines of the Illuminati”, Chapter 7, “The Li Bloodline")
Li is an Illuminist bloodline that is of the distinct and separate species of human that we refer to as “Neanderthal”.
AQUATIC LIFE IS BOOMING AND BURGEONING TO AN UNPRECEDENTED LEVEL, BECAUSE THE SIZE, FERTILITY AND LONGEVITY OF ANY ORGANISM VARIES DIRECTLY WITH THE HEALTH OF ITS ETHERIC ENVIRONMENT.
Chilean fish exports increased 10.8% in the 1st Quarter of 2012, year-over-year.
After peaking in March 2014, fish prices have been falling, with the FAO fish price index hitting a five-year low in July 2015. That’s because prices drop either when supply increases, demand decreases, or both. In this case, increasing supply is driving down fish prices.
In September 2015, the Kuwait Times attributed falling fish prices in Kuwait to “the boycott campaign.”
Where “the boycott campaign” is a false plausible-deniability excuse, put forward to cover up the increase in supply that is driving down fish prices in Kuwait. The propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The Kuwait Times is using conscious deception with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.
In 2016, Nature News said that a “fall” in fish catch “threatened human health”. While Ireland’s seafood sector increased 7% from 2016 to 2017.
“Nature News” is an organ of the state, and is using conscious deception with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.
In July 2016, the Financial Times said that the international fish trade “faced Brexit impact”. While Ireland’s seafood sector increased 7% from 2016 to 2017.
“Brexit impact” is a false plausible-deniability excuse, put forward to cover up the increase in supply that is driving down fish prices in all the nations.
The propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
Fish prices “dipped further” in Oman in 2017 as supplies “soared”. That’s an example of an increase in supply leading to a drop in fish prices.
In May 2017, undercurrentnews.com said “Fish oil prices collapse amid drop in supplements market”.
Where “drop in supplements market” is a false plausible-deniability excuse, put forward to cover up the exponential increase in supply that is driving down fish prices in all the nations. The propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
In December 2017, the U.K.’s Guardian said “Mass starvation is humanity's fate if we keep flogging the land to death”, and “Despite a massive increase in effort (bigger boats, bigger engines, more gear), the worldwide fish catch is declining by roughly 1% a year, as populations collapse.”
We know that the claims that the worldwide fish catch is decreasing by 1% and that fish populations are collapsing are both false because Bocaccio and darkblotched rockfish stocks on the west coast of the United States, which were declared overfished in 1999 and 2000, respectively, were declared rebuilt in 2017, both well before their original target dates. And because we know that the world fish trade hit an all-time high in 2017. And because we know that India’s seafood exports increased 25% in the first quarter of 2017. And because we know that Norway’s seafood exports increased 25% in 2017.
The U.K.’s Guardian is a Mouthpiece of the State, using conscious deception with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.
Salmon bait fish rebounded on Lake Michigan in 2017.
The value of Sri Lanka’s seafood exports increased 18% in the 1st Quarter of 2017.
The Solomon Islands recorded a $57.5m trade surplus in the 1st Quarter of 2017, “the increase mainly attributed to $52.1m of fish loin exports to Italy.” The author used the bizarre “fish loins” to gymnastically avoid saying “tuna”.
China's seafood imports rose 17.1% year-on-year from Jan-June 2017.
Sri Lanka’s seafood exports increased 40% in the first six months of 2017.
In January 2017, VnExpress said that Vietnam’s seafood exports “could be left fishing in 2017”.
Vietnamese seafood exports increased 15% in the first seven months of 2017.
Vietnamese seafood exports hit $8bn for the first time in 2017.
Seafood exports in Pakistan increased 12.99% in February 2017, year-over-year.
Pakistan’s fish exports during April 2017 were 33% higher than the previous April.
Pakistan’s fish exports increased 17% in June 2017.
State fish records “fell like rain” in Wisconsin in 2017.
In August 2017, bloomberg.com said “North Korean Seafood Exports to China Surge Before Ban”.
The article goes on to say “North Korean seafood exports to China surged to more than $50 million dollars in July, Chinese customs data showed, rising before a complete ban starts Sept. 5 under a United Nations Security Council resolution.”
We know from a previous article that seafood exports generated US$190 million for North Korea in 2016. Here, they’re giving us just the July, 2017 number, which is the vague “more than $50 million dollars”. That vagueness is a hallmark of propaganda. $50M is more than 25% of $190M, in just one month…but that’s as close as we’re going to get on the numbers, for now.
The ruse here is that the exports surged because North Korea quick sold a bunch of extra fish – versus the truth, that they sold all they caught. They note the value, but carefully omit the volume. And they let you know what the value number surged up to, but carefully withheld where it had surged from, so you couldn’t get any idea of the percentage increase.
Can you see how the headline says only generally “exports SURGE”? The propagandist knows that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines. They’ve done what they could to hedge by, in journalistic parlance, “burying” information about the scope of the positive change in the body of the article.
In August 2017, undercurrentnews.com said “Vietnam seafood exports up 18% in value so far this year”. Where there is, pointedly, no mention of volume.
The article continues: “Vietnam shipped $749 million worth of seafood abroad in August, bringing seafood exports in the first eight months of 2017 to $5.13 billion, up 18.1% from the same period last year, reports Vietnam Plus. According to the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, the largest buyers of Vietnamese seafood included the US, Japan, China and South Korea, accounting for 55.6% of total exports. Export value to China showed the biggest increase, up 57.2%, followed by Japan 30.8%, the UK (30.1%), South Korea (28.8%), the Netherlands (25.3%) and Canada (20.7%).”
The international news blackout that is in place on this subject demands the downplaying, or in this case the complete omission of volume numbers, which, since increased volume drives down price, are even higher than the value numbers that are exclusively displayed here.
Pakistan’s fish exports increased 19.63% in the two months from August 2017 to October 2017.
In the first five months of 2018 Peruvian fish exports for human consumption rose 80% compared with 2017. Peruvian fish exports almost doubled from 2017 to 2018.
The value of fish exports in Myanmar increased 16% from 2017 to 2018. We don’t know the volume number because the international news blackout that is in place on this subject demands the downplaying or omission of volume numbers, which clarify that the “Poor Mother Gaia is Dying” confidence game is just that.
The world's fishmeal and fish oil production almost doubled from 2017 to 2018.
Scotland’s seafood exports to Japan increased more than tripled from 2017 to 2018.
Marine Harvest Scotland harvested a record 17,772 tons of gutted weight in the first quarter of 2017, a new record 40% higher than the 1st Quarter of the previous year.
The highest harvest volumes in all history were said to be “due to higher average weight and hence more biomass in sea at the start of the year, combined with strong production and improved fish health.”
In March 2017, an article which I am now unable to locate said “Atlantic fish and seafood companies casting a wide net to increase exports”.
Where the author plays the “they’re selling harder than ever” ruse to suggest that they’re moving product - fresh fish, no less! - that had previously gone unsold. It’s a spectacular, childish, moronic falsehood, put forward because the propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
In July 2017, seafoodsource.com said “Chinese crayfish, shrimp exports jump in 2017”. Can you see how “jump” is general? It implies that the number went up, but will come right back down again, like when you jump.
They’re printing the article mid-year so that future searches on 2017 Chinese seafood exports will only reveal the smaller numbers that the author has, in journalistic parlance, “buried” below.
The article continues: “Other Chinese seafood exports were also up so far in 2017.”
Where “other” is general, and “up SO FAR” implies that they might go right back down.
The article continues: “Shrimp exports rose 11.6 percent in value and 17.9 percent in volume terms, while shipments of tilapia were up 9.14 percent in value and 6.68 percent in volume in the first four months of the year, according to the ministry data.”
They used “rose 11.6%” because “rose” is softer than “increased”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black Sun cult that has run things in all the nations, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
In journalism, there’s a strict rule where you list larger numbers first. Can you see how, in shrimp exports, they broke the rule, where volume is larger, and then, in shrimp value, where the value increase is larger, they listed it first. It’s perverted, it’s psychotic, it’s bald-facedly obvious.
The article continues: “Chinese crayfish exports have soared this year, according to official statistics released by the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture.
Exports of crayfish jumped 68 percent in volume terms and 60.4 percent in value terms in the first four months of 2017. The recently released data didn’t include absolute figures for either volume or value.”
The numbers are obviously highly specific. The author hung the hedge “didn’t include absolute figures” on the end because they know that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The author doesn’t venture any guess as to what is driving the historically-unprecedented increase in crayfish and shrimp production in China.
Clearly, there’s been some huge positive change in the environment of crayfish and shrimp in China in the first four months of 2017.
In July 2017, the moronically-named mynewsdesk.com said “Norwegian seafood exports break new records in first half of 2017”.
They’re printing the article mid-year so that future searches on 2017 Norwegian seafood exports will only reveal the smaller numbers that the author has, in journalistic parlance, “buried” below.
The article goes on to say that “Never before has Norway exported a greater value of seafood than in the first six months of 2017. The increase is due primarily to record-high salmon prices but also to strong growth in export volumes to the U.S. and Asian markets.”
The international news blackout that is in place on this subject demands the downplaying or omission of volume numbers that expose the “Poor Mother is Dying” confidence game for what it is. The author leads with “value”, and then carefully “buries” volume at the bottom, to minimize it.
Clearly, there’s been some huge positive change in the environment of marine life in Norway in the first half of 2017.
In July 2017, Reuters said “Hunchun's exports up”. Where, under the false guise of familiarity, the author has omitted “China”, to make the subject drastically less searchable. And “exports UP” is general, to blunt any specific insight the reader might have into the great positive change.
The article continues: “So far in 2017, Hunchun’s seafood trade appears to be going strong, though; in the first quarter of 2017 the town's seafood exports were up, according to the most recent trade figures from Jilin provincial authority, although the figures seem to be at odds with earlier, much larger figures.”
Where “so far” and “appears to be” and “though” and “although the figures seem to be at odds with earlier, much larger figures” are all general hedges, to blunt any detailed insight the reader might have into the great positive change the article documents.
The article continues: “In the first three months of this year, Hunchun's seafood exports rose 89% year-on-year to $22.2m in value, according to a report published on the authority's website dated April. Seafood imports also increased -- up 47% y-o-y to $20.1m in value.”
The international news blackout that is in place on this subject demand the downplaying or omission of volume numbers, which expose the “Poor Mother Gaia is Dying” confidence game for what it is. These stunning figures are smaller than the obfuscated volume numbers, as prices decrease either when supply increases, or demand decreases, or both. So seafood exports out of Hunchun, China basically doubled from 2016 to 2017, year over year.
There’s no mention in the article as to what might have caused a doubling in exports out of Hunchun. That’s an example of a propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
The author used “ROSE 89%” because it’s softer than “increased”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black Sun cult that has run things in all the nations, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
In August 2017, scmp.com truthfully said “All you need to know about China's sanctions on North Korea”.
They’re a State propaganda organ, telling you quite clearly What To Think. The article says: “The combined value of North Korea's 2016 exports to China of coal, iron ore, lead ore and seafood – all of which are now banned by Beijing – was almost US$1.5 billion, or 60 per cent of its total exports.”
They combine them, and make sure you can’t get the individual numbers, specifically seafood, which, in journalistic parlance, the author has “buried” to the last, to downplay it. The author talks about value, but carefully omits volume, as the international news blackout that is in place on this subject specifically demands the downplaying or omission of volume numbers, which expose the “Poor Mother Gaia is Dying” confidence game.
In October 2017, the Korean News Digest said “Seafood exports up 10.9 percent in first three quarters of 2017”. Can you see how, under the false guise of familiarity, the headline omits the name of the nation, to make the subject virtually unsearchable.
The author uses the classic “rushing to press” ruse in which they report the year’s volume’s three months early, so that the number is smaller. Then, in January, the generational Satanist running the newsroom will say “we just ran a story on that”, and the news blackout on the subject will run on unimpeded.
The article continues “Exports of South Korean seafood rose 10.9 percent in the first nine months of 2017 from a year earlier on strong demand for dried laver and tuna, the maritime ministry said Sunday.”
Where we once again see the tirelessly-deployed “increased demand” ruse, vs. the truth, “they sold all they caught.”
There was clearly some huge positive change in the marine environment in Korea in 2017.
In October 2017, The News Now said “Seafood exports at Rs 9066 crore in first quarter”.
Can you see how, under the false guise of familiarity, the headline omits the word “India”, to make the subject virtually unsearchable? That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The international news blackout that is in place on this subject demands the downplaying, or in this case the complete omission of volume numbers, which is why the headline omits them. The headline also omits the name of the nation, to make the subject drastically less searchable, and makes only a flat statement about the value of Fish exports in India in the first quarter of 2017. Those are both examples of a propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”. The propagandist knows that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines.
The article continues: “India's seafood exports stood at 2,51735 Metric Tonnes, valued at Rs 9066.06 crore (US$1.42 billion) in the first quarter of the current fiscal, according to the Marine Products Exports Development Authority (MPEDA). During the same period in the last fiscal it stood at 2,01223 MT, worth $1.17 billion.”
Where “exports STOOD” brazenly implies they were unchanged. The headline of the article leads with a boring, out-of-context money number, then the volume numbers are “buried” lower in the body of the article. And no percentage is provided, just the numbers. That’s careful hedging. So I had to do the math. 201223 to 251735 metric tons is a twenty five percent increase. Such volume increases usually consist of tiny margins. This is an historically-unprecedented - and completely unexplained - one year increase in volume.
In November 2017, seafoodsource.com said “India's seafood exports up by 21 percent so far in 2017”. It’s a classic technique - publish the story in November, to pretend you are “all over what’s news”, when in fact you are publishing early to avoid having an even larger number to report as the official year’s total. This way, in December, the person running the newsroom can say “we just ran an article on that”, and the news blackout runs on uninterrupted.
The article continues: “India's first quarter exports rose 21 percent off of increasing demand for frozen shrimp in the international market”.
The tirelessly-played “increasing demand” ruse is used, vs. the truth, “they sold all they caught.” Did you notice that they said it was shrimp demand, when the seafood export volume number is up 21 percent overall? More downplaying, more compartmentalization. Did you notice how they don’t break out the percentage of shrimp vs. overall seafood?
“Increasing demand for frozen shrimp” is a bullshit plausible-deniability excuse, put forward because the propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.In December 2017, mynewsdesk.com said “Norwegian seafood exports for 2017 exceed last year's level by a clear margin”, and that “Norway exported 286,000 tonnes of seafood worth NOK 9 billion in November. Volume increased by 25 per cent.”
Where the headline uses the general “by a clear margin” as hedge downplaying the stunning 25% increase in volume, a specific figure “buried” down below the general headline which leads the article. The author knows that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines. That’s an example of a propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
If you'd like to be added to this free mailing list, please send me a note at [email protected].
