APPLES
In September 2017, Patch.com said “Connecticut Apple Crop Rebounds, Could Produce Record Harvest”.
Where “record” harvest is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon. With a record harvest a certainty, patch pretends it could go either way. With nature booming and burgeoning to a level not seen in my lifetime, the false picture is painted of a see saw battle between health and ruin.
“After drought and an ill-timed spring frost produced a disappointing apple harvest statewide in Connecticut last year, growers say the 2017 crop has rebounded strongly and could reach record numbers. "
Now, how an ill-timed spring frost (that’s Mil-speak for ‘incredibly late’) could be bodging things up in the hottest year in all history is something only a Coincidence theorist could explain, and it would include either “yeah, but that’s THERE” or “El Nino”, or both.
What is the size of the current record? When was the last record? What was it? What was the margin between the records? Why is there a record harvest this year? How does this record harvest related to the countless other record harvests observed in 2017?
The generational Satanist press release on the largest apple harvest in the 200-plus years of Connecticut’s existence offers no clue(s).
In October 2017, KOZI said “2017 Washington Apple Harvest Looks To Be Near Record Crop”.
Where “NEAR record” is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
They’ve used the classic “rushing to press” ruse, where they claim “LOOKS to be” “NEAR record” hedges back two steps from “largest in history”.
The story continues: “The 2017 apple harvest is well underway and all indicators point to a near record crop.”
There’s no mention as to what’s driving the historically-unprecedented volume of apples.
A KOZI story from two months later, in December 2017, reads “2017 Apple Harvest Was Largest In History”.
Where “LARGEST in history” is general.
The article continues: “The state Tree Fruit Association released their post harvest report, which estimates the state produced more than 142 million 40-pound boxes of apples. That beat out the previous record of 141 million set in 2014.”
Where “MORE than 142 million” is general. I had to look up a separate article to learn that it was 142.3 million. The propagandist reduced it by 300,000 apples in the story we’re studying, and also took care not to proved a far more impactful percentage. So, I had do do the math. It was a .92% increase, almost a 1% increase. An extra one million, three hundred thousand 40 pound boxes of apples were grown in Washington state in 2017, as compared to the previous record from 2014.
The article continues: “Todd Fryhover, President of the Washington Apple Commission says records have been broken three of the last five harvests. Fryhover says acreage devoted to apples has continually increased since 2011. Primarily newer, higher density orchards – essentially more trees in tighter spaces – what Fryhover called economics per acre. He said most apple orchards are in the Yakima Valley, followed by the Columbia Basin, Okanogan and Chelan Valleys and finally Wenatchee Valley.”
As any bored to distraction reader of my articles can attest, fruit records of all kinds were set in 2017, and yet this is the first time that “cramming more trees in there” has brazenly been put forward as an excuse. In fact, if cramming more trees in is the driver of the largest apple harvest in the history of the state of Washington, how come the story from just last month on the largest apple harvest in the history of the state of Connecticut doesn’t mention apple-cramming. Or doesn’t even mention the record harvest in Washington, at all? Those are examples of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
Other examples of unprecedented agricultural production in 2017 include peanut production in South Carolina increasing 38% from 2016 to 2017, to the highest level in history. While cotton production in South Carolina increased 92% from 2016 to 2017, to the highest level in history. While apple production in Washington and Connecticut both reached the highest level in history.
Todd, who has the Wizard of Oz title “President of the Washington Apple Commission” is in fact a generational Satanist hand-picked to shill some plausible-deniability bullshit excuse in the controlled press, because he and the propagandist writing the article both know that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility. It’s how the few have controlled the many, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
Here’s Todd’s picture:
(Todd Fryhover, President of the Washington Apple Commission)
I’ve included it so you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
Remember, Todd said there were more apples than ever in history because in Washington in 2017 because of “increased tree cramming”, and didn’t mention any of the other record harvests going on that same year, including, signally, that of apples in Connecticut. Remember, Todd loves him some apples like it’s his job.
SOYBEANS
In January 2018, News.Delaware.Gov said “Delaware has record soybean harvest in 2017”.
Where “record” harvest is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
The article continues: “Last week USDA’s National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) released the final crop production summary for 2017. Overall, Delaware farmers had a good year with some of the crops breaking records.”
Where the greatest year in the history of agriculture is hedged back down to merely a “good” year.
The article continues: “When we look at the USDA’s production summary it confirms what we saw as we moved throughout the state. We had good weather and Delaware farmers were able to get into the fields at key points throughout the season,” said Secretary of Agriculture Michael T. Scuse. “Yields such as we had in 2017 are good news for our farmers, and for poultry growers and processors who use much of the grain grown here for feed.”
The Illuminist talking-head quoted in the mainstream news article has hedged great, excellent weather down to merely “good” weather, and then hedged great, fantastic news for farmers down to merely “good” news. It’s careful, it’s systematic, it’s what they refer to in their business as “tradecraft”.
The article continues: “The Mid-Atlantic region including Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, and Virginia all saw record high yields for soybean production. Much of this was attributed to the weather and proper planting time. Delaware was one of nine states to break record high yields for soybeans with yields of 51 bushels per acre, up 22.9 percent from 2016. Delaware produced more than 8 million bushels of soybeans in 2017.”
Where “the” weather is general. What aspect of the weather, pray? They’ve “compartmentalized” the phenomenon with another hedging generality.
The article continues: “Delaware corn growers produced 32.3 million bushels in 2017. This past year’s corn crop was the third highest yield with 189 bushels per acre, up 11.2 percent from 2016. Other notable crop records for Delaware included winter wheat up 8.9 percent at 73 bushels per acre from 2016. All hay area harvested produced a yield of 3.28 tons per acre with 59,000 tons produced.”
We can only infer that hay is a record, and they won’t say what the previous record was, or when it was set, or provide the margin between the records, as doing so would violate the international news blackout’s forbiddance of detail regarding the phenomenon I’m documenting here.
The article continues:
DELAWARE SOYBEAN YIELD RECORDS
2017: 51 bushels/acre
2016: 41.5
2015: 40
2014: 47.5
2013: 40.5
2011: 39.5
2000: 43
2004: 42.5
2012: 42.5
2009: 42
2001: 39
1994: 36.5
Can you see how they mixed the records up in the list, so you can’t discern or analyze the trends I’m exposing here?
Can you see how they didn’t make any comment at all about the margins between the records?
The Delaware state soybean yield record of 51 bushels per acre from 2017 was 39% higher than the Delaware state soybean yield record of 36.5 bushels per acre from 1994. That’s an average annual increase in yield of 1.69% over those 23 years.
The Delaware state soybean record of 43 bushels per acre from 2000 was 17.8% larger than the previous record of 36.5 bushels per acre set in 1994. A close to 20% increase in yield in just six years from 1994 to 2000, geez, what gives? That’s an average annual increase in yield of 3.3% over those six years. It’s 95% above the baseline, which we’d expect, given that it’s the first data in the set, and we adhere to the Orthodoxy that organisms grow in progressively smaller increments as they approach their genetically-programmed maximum size.
The next year, in 2001, the yield dropped 9.3% to 39 bushels per year. Well, that drop of almost ten percent in one year is way, way below the baseline, but that’s okay, because we’d expect to see the rate of increase get lower, going forward in time.
What we’re seeing, here, is the broad-spectrum impact of the Death energy-based “communications infrastructure that was thrown up suddenly virtually overnight in all the nations back around the turn of the Century.
The Delaware state soybean record of 42.5 bushels per year in 2004 was identical to the previous record of 42.5 bushels per year set in 2004. The life force still being artificially held back by what we broadly refer to as “technology”, or wireless communication.
The Delaware state soybean record of 42 bushels per year in 2009 was another decrease of 1.1%. Things going further downward under the relentless pressure of the Death energy system under discussion.
The Delaware state soybean record of 39.5 bushels per year from 2011 was 6.3% lower than the previous record of 42 bushels per year in 2009. That’s an average decrease of 3.15% per year over those two years.
This is all mapping perfectly, right? Because the growth rate is decreasing, going forward in time. That is, if you accept the Orthodoxy that that organisms grow in progressively smaller increments as they approach their genetically-programmed maximum size.
The Delaware state soybean record of 42.5 bushels per acre from 2012 is 6.7% higher than the 39.5 bushels per acre from 2011. That’s a 6.7% increase in one year, and the growth rate has just increased exponentially, going forward in time. That’s impossible if we adhere to the Orthodoxy that organisms grow in progressively smaller increments as they approach their genetically-programmed maximum size.
As of 2012, we’ve gotten back to the level of etheric health last seen in 2004.
If “genetically modified seed” is responsible for the increases in productivity we’re seeing, how or why is the yield the same in 2012 as it was in 2004? It’s not. Any Coincidence Theorists professing such things are going to get their heads right, or withdraw from the course.
The Delaware state soybean yield record of 40.5 bushels per acre from 2013 is 4.9% lower than the previous record of 42.5 bushels from 2012. What’s with the whipsawing up and down of the yield, statewide, mind-you?
If you accept my thesis, the health of the ether in 2013 was back down to roughly the same level seen in the early 2000’s.
The Delaware state soybean yield record of 47.5 bushels per acre from 2014 was 17.2% larger than the previous record of 40.5 bushels per acre set in 2013. That’s a 17.2% increase, in just one year. Roughly the same increase as was seen in the six years from 1994 to 2000. So now the growth rate is the highest in history, and the growth rate is increasing exponentially, going forward in time.
The Delaware state soybean yield record of 40 bushels per acre from 2015 is 18.75% smaller than the 47.5 bushels per acre from 2014. A quantum decrease, back down to roughly the same level seen in 2001.
The Delaware state soybean yield record of 41.5 bushels per acre from 2016 is 3.75% larger than the 40 bushels per acre from 2015. But if the health of the ether is directly connected to the size, fertility and longevity of any organism, we’re still down in the productivity range seen throughout the 2000’s.
The Delaware state soybean yield record of 51 bushels per acre from 2017 is 18.6% larger than the 41.5 bushels per acre from 2016. That’s 23% increase, in one year, the largest one year increase in the data set, and the last data in the set. Exponentially beyond the baseline. To the highest level in history.
The size, fertility and longevity of any organism vary directly with that of its etheric environment.
In December 2017, magnoliareporter.com said “Arkansas soybean harvest yield may set new record”.
The article goes on to say “The 2017 Arkansas soybean harvest will break state yield records if the USDA’s November forecast holds up, said Jeremy Ross, extension soybean agronomist for the University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture.”
Wow. Given that the headline says that Arkansas only “MAY” set new record, and the guy who studies soybeans for a living said “IF” the forecast holds up, the race must be real close, right?
“The USDA’s National Agricultural Statistics Service forecasts Arkansas’ soybean harvest will be 175 million bushels, up 20 percent from 145.7 million bushels in 2016.
As, yes, as co-Conspirators, Jeremy and the author have done what little they could to downplay a shocking, historically-unprecedented and also-unexplained one-year increase in the soybean yield in Arkansas. In the same year that we saw shocking, historically-unprecedented and also-unexplained one-year increases in the soybean yields in Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, and Virginia.
“We had nine fields that topped 100 bushels per acre,” Ross said. That tops the previous record of 7 fields that made 100 bushels per acre. “I see that as a kind of barometer of how good a year we had,” he said.
Where “tops” implies that the new record just exceeded the old. The author provided the numbers for the old and new records, but carefully hedged again by omitting the far more impactful percentage increase between them. So I had to do the math. The number of Arkansas soybean fields that produced over 100 bushels per acre increased 29% from 2016 to 2017. Jeremy said “That tops the previous record”.
It wasn’t the greatest year in the history of soybean farming in Arkansas, rather that year was merely “good”.
By the way, the soybean yield in Delaware increased 23% from 2016 to 2017, compared to the soybean yield in Arkansas, which increased 29% from 2016 to 2017.
Can you see how the great confidence game that is being run upon us is collapsing under cross-examination?
Here’s the con artist, Jeremy Ross. He’s on the right, trying to make himself appear honest and truthful:
(Jeremy Ross, Extensions Soybean Agronomist, University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture)
I’ve included his photo so you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
You can’t identify them by their appearance, that is, beyond the occasional “secret” hand sign. You can only identify them via the repetitive, codified way in which they speak, and write.
Neither Jeremy nor the author offer any suggestion as to what drove the shocking, historically-unprecedented increase in soybean yield in Arkansas in 2017. And neither of them mentioned, let alone attempted to explain the statistically-similar increase in soybean yield in Delaware the same year.
The author I could perhaps understand, but Mr. Ross loves him some soybeans like it’s his job. No, seriously, it actually is his job.
They’re desperate to keep you from recognizing that the size, fertility and longevity of any organism very directly with the health of its etheric environment.
Jeff Miller, Brooklyn, New York, December 8, 2020
If you'd like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
