DROPPING TRUST IN GOVERNMENT - THE COLLAPSE OF THE CONFIDENCE GAME
Great positive changes are underway at every level of our reality. They began in earnest in 2012, and have been increasing in speed and magnitude. I began writing this series of articles, entitled “Positive Changes That Are Occurring”, in July of 2013.
These historically-unprecedented positive changes are being driven by many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices based on the work of Wilhelm Reich and Karl Hans Welz.
Since Don Croft first fabricated tactical Orgonite in 2000, its widespread, ongoing and ever-increasing distribution has been unknitting and transforming the ancient Death energy matrix built and expanded by our dark masters, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. And, as a result, the Ether is returning to its natural state of health and vitality.
One of those changes is that public trust of government is dropping exponentially, regardless of culture or geography. That’s because moral and mental health vary directly with that of the subject’s etheric environment.
“Confidence games”, or cons, for short, are swindles in which self-described con “artists” take advantage of people after first putting on fair guise and gaining the trust of the credulous, trusting “rubes” they are going to “fleece”.
The great cons that have been worked upon humanity for the entirety of our history are all collapsing at once. That’s because when con’s collapse, they do so in a rush, like a house of cards.
In 2012, the public’s approval of Congress reached an all-time low of 9% in the U.S.
Voter turnout in New York was at a record low in 2013.
In April 2013, the UK’s Guardian said “Crisis for Europe as trust hits record low”. The subhead reads “Poll in European Union’s six biggest countries finds Euroscepticism is soaring amid bailouts and spending cuts”.
“Soaring” is brave positive spin from a failing sociopath, still grinning at you with their whitened teeth as their organization is exposed.
The subhead begins with “Poll” to give your subconscious the green light to say “oh, but that’s just one poll!” The propagandist knows that the subconconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The article continues: “The poll found a vertiginous decline in trust in the EU in countries that were traditionally pro-European. Public confidence in the European Union has fallen to historically low levels in the six biggest EU countries, raising fundamental questions about its democratic legitimacy more than three years into the union’s worst ever crisis, new data shows. Public confidence in the European Union fell to the lowest level on record in 2013.”
Where the author used the lurid but general “vertiginous decline” in place of the stronger “drop” or “decrease”, as spin, and also to echo the word “recline”. And where “fell” was used because it’s softer than “dropped” or “decreased”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer.
What the author hyperbolically calls “CRISIS for Europe” is in fact the rapidly increasing awareness of Europeans that the Fox is in the Henhouse, that the fix is in from the top. That there is, yes, wait for it, Some Big Conspiracy. The lowest public confidence on record in Europe means the end of the confidence game.
Voter turnout in the U.S. in 2014 was the lowest since WWII.
In 2014, Millennials had historically low levels of trust in Government. Confidence games, or “cons”, for short, are swindles in which a self-described con “artist” puts on fair guise and proceeds to take advantage of some wholly-credulous, trusting “rube”. This drop in trust signals the end of the confidence game.
In 2015, the state of Washington set its lowest mark ever for voter turnout in an off-year election.
In 2015, Hillary Clinton was the most establishment-approved candidate on record.
In the undated photo above, Hillary Clinton, the most establishment-approved candidate on record, says “I love you” in American Sign Language, openly signals her support of the Texas Longhorns football team, says she wants to “rock on”, or signals her allegiance to the dark god she and her fellow generational Satanists have worshipped, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. You’ll have to use your personal discernment to come to your own conclusions on the matter.
In ancient Egypt, their god was known as “Set”. That’s where we get the word “Satan”. Same bloodline on the thrones of all the nations, then to now.
Voter turnout in New Jersey’s November 2015 election was the lowest in the state’s history, going back to 1924.
Australian trust in politicians dropped to the lowest level on record in 2016. Confidence games, or “cons”, for short, are swindles in which a self-described con “artist” puts on fair guise and proceeds to take advantage of some wholly-credulous, trusting “rube”. This drop in trust signals the end of the confidence game.
Australian voter turnout dropped to the lowest level on record in 2016.
Haiti’s voter turnout dropped to the lowest level on record in 2016.
Greek’s voter turnout dropped to the lowest level on record in 2016.
American voter turnout dropped to its lowest level on record in 2016.
Brazil’s trust in its leadership dropped to its lowest level on record in 2016. Confidence games, or “cons”, for short, are swindles in which a self-described con “artist” puts on fair guise and proceeds to take advantage of some wholly-credulous, trusting “rube”. This drop in trust signals the end of the confidence game.
Both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton scored historically unfavorable ratings in a March 2016 poll.
In the photo above, sworn enemies and the most disliked candidates in the history of the U.S. presidency Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton somehow both openly signal their mutual support of the Texas Longhorns football team, say they want to “rock on”, or tell their wholly-credulous constituents that they love them in American Sign Language, depending upon your mood. Actually, those are the plausible-deniability excuses put forward to cover up the fact that Donald and Hillary are both genetically-related members of the literal crime family of generational Satanists who have controlled things in all the nations, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
You know that all U.S. Presidents trace their maternal lineage back to King John I of England, right?
Plausible-deniability excuses are used because many or most readers are eager to grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why a PBS.org video from April 2016 was headlined “Hillary Clinton is Puzzled as to Why Voters Don’t Trust Her”.
Confidence games, or “cons”, for short, are swindles in which a self-described con “artist” puts on fair guise and proceeds to take advantage of some wholly-credulous, trusting “rube”. This drop in trust signals the end of the confidence game.
In May 2017 voter turnout was at a record low for France’s parliamentary elections.
In July 2017, ppic.org said only-generally that “California’s Low Voter Turnout Driven by Demographics”.
Can you see how the propagandist is trying to “compartmentalize” the phenomenon of low-voter turnout, which is occurring regardless of culture or geography, merely to California?
In August 2016, The Diplomat explained “Why Sri Lanka Doesn’t Trust the UN”.
Where “doesn’t trust” is general. It’s used to blunt any specific insight into the magnitude of the trend. The author has “compartmentalized” the phenomenon, as sixty to seventy readers only read the headlines, as the propagandist well knows.
It’s a hit-piece, designed to cover up generally-decreasing trust in the UN with the “lightning rod” of Sri Lanka.
Confidence games, or “cons”, for short, are swindles in which a self-described con “artist” puts on fair guise and proceeds to take advantage of some wholly-credulous, trusting “rube”. This drop in trust signals the end of the confidence game.
In October 2016, the Denver post widened its eyes to simulate honesty and sowed the seed of doubt with “Are Americans losing faith in democracy***?”***
In November 2016, FiveThirtyEight said only-generally that “Americans Don’t Trust Their Institutions Anymore”.
As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda.
Confidence games, or “cons”, for short, are swindles in which a self-described con “artist” puts on fair guise and proceeds to take advantage of some wholly-credulous, trusting “rube”. This drop in trust signals the end of the confidence game.
Voter turnout in Travis County, Texas dropped more than 50 percent between the 2016 presidential election and the local and constitutional elections there in November 2017.
The U.S. saw a record 37% drop in public trust in 2017. Where do you think that trust level is here in the U.S. in 2020, after the barely-covert international release of a Chinese bat virus with four amino acids added to it for improved transmissibility to humans?
You know that the word Covid comes from the Middle English “Covin”, right?
COVIN, fraud. A secret conspiracy between two or more persons, to act to the detriment or injury of another. A secret contrivance between two or more persons to defraud and prejudice another of his rights.
The Oxford English Dictionary does what it can to hedge and defray by providing this definition: “Covin - Origin Middle English (denoting a company or band).
A merry company or band of individuals whose secret conspiracy and contrivances go carefully unmentioned by the world’s top authority on the English language. Prosecution rests, your honor, no further questions.
A 2017 survey showed that global trust in Government was at an all-time low. Confidence games, or “cons”, for short, are swindles in which a self-described con “artist” puts on fair guise and proceeds to take advantage of some wholly-credulous, trusting “rube”. This drop in trust signals the end of the confidence game, regardless of culture or national boundary.
Voter turnout in the U.K. was the 5th lowest on record in 2017.
Voter turnout in the E.U. was the lowest on record in 2017.
The number of Americans who trusted their government “to do what is right” dropped 14% from 2017 to 2018. Confidence games, or “cons”, for short, are swindles in which a self-described con “artist” puts on fair guise and proceeds to take advantage of some wholly-credulous, trusting “rube”. This drop in trust signals the end of the confidence game.
How do you think trust in the government is doing in America here a year after the barely-covert release of a Chinese bat virus with four amino acids added for improved transmissibility to humans?
In 2017, World News said “Catalan nationalists losing faith in the EU”.
Can you see how they softened faith that has been concretely lost to merely “losing” faith?
Sales of “1984” have increased 9,500% amid the start of Trump’s presidency in 2017. The book was in such high demand the publisher ordered a 75,000-copy reprint.
In January 2017, Edelman.com said “2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER Reveals Global Implosion of Trust”.
Where “GLOBAL IMPLOSION”, while lurid, and accurate, is also general. Dropped how low? Where did it drop from? Over what time period? The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
The author continues, clear in their point of view: “The credibility of leaders also is in peril: CEO credibility dropped 12 points globally to an all-time low of 37 percent, plummeting in every country studied, while government leaders (29 percent) remain least credible.”
Twelve percentage “points” are mentioned, which is a softening of “dropped 12%”.
“Plummeting” was used as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer. But the main reason it was used is because it’s general - hedging and defraying against specific insight into the magnitude of the trend in the only-generally-mentioned “every” country studied.
Confidence games, or “cons”, for short, are swindles in which a self-described con “artist” puts on fair guise and proceeds to take advantage of some wholly-credulous, trusting “rube”. This drop in trust, regardless of culture or national boundary, signals the end of the confidence game.
In January 2017, oneyoungworld.com hedged that “It looks like young people are losing faith in global leadership”.
Where “losing” faith is general.
And where “leadership” is the most positive and awesome-sounding word possible for “politicians”. Where “LOST faith in global LEADERS” is walked back to “LOSING faith in global leaderSHIP”. They’re trying to avoid any actual leaders getting strung up from any actual lamp posts. That’s a Mussolini reference, by the way.
In February 2017 Donald Trump’s approval rating was the lowest in history at the one month mark in his term.
During World War II, the German populace totally understood that he was a British double agent, doing everything he could to set up and knock down the country, while promising to “make Germany great again”. There were 24 attempts on Hitler’s life from 1932 to 1944. That’s two a year for twelve years. Does it have an historical counterpart? Not that I’ve heard of.
Ramrodding the con over the populace, even though a large subset get that a con is being worked. The percentage of the populace who discerned it was too small. Mussolini did the same thing to the Italians.
"Although generally regarded as the man who first swept to power (in 1922) as the savior of his country from communism, this book shows that, on the contrary, while communism was almost no threat at this time, by 1945, as a direct result of Mussolini’s reign, communism was set to spread rapidly in Europe, because he deliberately chose to turn Italy into a ‘social minefield’ primed to explode after his death, should he be defeated.
It is (next to the history of the Third Reich) the most extraordinary case-study of a man whose skill was in building myths about himself and his movement that convinced not just a whole country but the international governments of his day. He had a brilliant and monumental talent for deceit, which he exercised so effectively that he eventually fell victim to it himself, fooled by his own propaganda into entering a war his country could only lose, in a terrible way."
From “Mussolini”, by Denis Mack Smith, 1982
Mr. Smith plays the ruse that, while tons of Italian citizens got that Mussolini was a double-agent, every other ruler of every nation was completely fooled. The author of the definitive work on Mussolini is desperate to keep you from grasping that there is, indeed, Some Big Conspiracy.
Smith, a generational Satanist propagandist known as “the premier authority on Mussolini” plays that Mussolini only blundered when he ruined Italy, the same farce that’s played with Hitler, who ruined Germany. Smith is a Trusted Authority Figure, using conscious deception with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.
That admission that Mussolini booby-trapped things is a half-truth. The greater truth that is concealed behind it is Mussolini’s planned destruction of Italy.
Mussolini won the election using the “make Italy great again!” platform. For ten extra points, can anyone else name a dictator other than Hitler and Mussolini who got elected promising to make their country great again?
In February 2017, scmp.com said “Malaysians’ trust in the system plunges to all-time low, according to survey”.
The word “plunges” was used because it’s it’s softer than “dropped”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer. But the main reason it was used is because it’s general.
“TO all-time low” is also general. How low? Where did it drop from? Over what time period? The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
The author put the snide “according to SURVEY” on the end to give your subconscious the green light to say “oh, but that as just one survey!”
The propagandist knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “shocking”.
That’s why an Express article from the U.K. from March 2017 reads “Public Trust in the European Union at ‘all time low’ says shocking new Ipsos MORI poll”.
Where “AT all-time low” is general. How low? Where did it drop from? Over what time period? The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
They’ve ended the headline with “poll” so that your subconscious can grasp the straw of “oh, but that was just one poll!” The propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
In March 2017 voter turnout was at a record low for the mayor’s election in Los Angeles.
In May 2017 voter turnout was at a record low for France’s parliamentary elections.
In May 2017, cbc.ca said ‘Honestly, I don’t get it’: Nova Scotia voter turnout at record low”.
Anytime a politician says “honestly” they are, by definition, lying. Or anyone else, for that matter.
The premier vowed to look at “how we turn that around” but didn’t offer specifics on how he would do so.
“I’m happy to look at any changes, electorally, that would engage more citizens,” McNeil said. “I know the prime minister tried that and it didn’t go well with Canadians.”
In Canada, they know the fix is in from the top, only most haven’t gotten to the “they’re all genetically related to one another” part. All in due time.
In May 2017, Pew Research said “Survey: American public’s trust in government near historic low”.
They’ve begun the headline with “Survey:” so that your subconscious can grasp the straw of “oh, it was just one survey!” The propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
Confidence games, or “cons”, for short, are swindles in which a self-described con “artist” puts on fair guise and proceeds to take advantage of some wholly-credulous, trusting “rube”. This drop in trust signals the end of the confidence game.
Cheeringly, a Pew article from September 2019 is headlined: “Public trust in government near historic lows”.
Can you see how, down through the years, Pew is steadfastly maintaining that trust in government that is AT historic lows is only NEAR historic lows?
Where do you think that number is now, after the barely-covert international release of a Chinese bat virus with four amino acids added to it for improved transmissibility to humans?
Confidence games, or “cons”, for short, are swindles in which a self-described con “artist” puts on fair guise and proceeds to take advantage of some wholly-credulous, trusting “rube”. This drop in trust signals the end of the confidence game.
In July 2017 Donald Trump had the lowest six-month approval rating of any president.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “stunning”. That’s why an mic.com article from July 2017 says “New study projects stunning drop in 2018 millennial voter turnout in battleground states”.
Where “stunning”, while lurid, is only-general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of statistics that would provide specific insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
They’ve kicked off the headline with “new STUDY projects” so that your subconscious can grasp the straw of “oh, but that was just one study!”
The propagandist knows that many or most readers are eager to grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The author has pulled a general drop in voting participation back merely to “Millennials”, and then pulled it back again from all the states to merely “battleground” states. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
You have to dig down into the article to learn ““35.1% of those who voted in 2016, or 25.4 million RAE voters, will stay home” in 2018.”
That’s a sudden drop of over one third in Millennial voter participation in the U.S. from 2016 to 2018. How do you think those Millenials are feeling now, after the barely-covert release of a Chinese bat virus with four amino acids added for improved transmissibility to humans?
In the 2020 propaganda film “Death to Covid”, near the end, the narrator announces that the American presidential election of 2020 was “the last in history”.
The great, ages-long confidence game is collapsing, and, in response, the folks in charge are going to have their next act be dropping the web, and trying to force us back into a “New Feudalism” in which grinning, nattily-suited generational Satanists can show up every few months on the train, and wave as it passes through. They’re going to try to drop the web because guys like me with too much time on their hands are doing way, way too much damage to the regime.
In July 2017, the Atlantic explained how “From Trump to Brexit: Trust in Government Is Collapsing Around the World”.
Where “collapsing”, while lurid, and accurate, is only-general.
Everyone in all the nations has recognized that the Fox is in the Henhouse. That the fix is in from the top. That the dimly recognized “One Percent” are having their way with humanity.
In August 2017, the New York Daily News said “Trump hits all-time low approval rating in CNN survey”.
Where “HITS all-time low” is general. How low? Where did it drop from? Over what time period? The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
They’ve ended the headline with “survey” so that your subconscious can grasp the straw of “oh, it was just one survey!” The propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
They threw “rating” in there because “Trump approval at all-time low” is stronger than “Trump HITS all time low approval RATING”. See how he “hit” it, as if he reached an important goal? That’s an example of what propagandists refer to as “spin”.
In September 2017, vox.com said “Brazilians are losing faith in democracy and considering a return to military rule”.
That’s Mil-speak for “Brazilians have woken up to the reality of “sham-democracy” and are about to get busted down to “brutal dictatorship”.
Can you see how they softened faith that has been concretely lost to merely “losing” faith?
In September 2017, NPR said “NPR/Ipsos Poll: Most Americans Don’t Trust Trump On North Korea”.
Where they used the general “MOST Americans” in the headline, and, in journalistic parlance, “buried” the far more impactful statistic in the body text below. That’s an example of a propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”. The propagandist knows that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines.
They’ve begun the headline with “Poll:” so that your subconscious can grasp the straw of “oh, it was just one poll!” The propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
In October 2017, PressTV said “Britain’s trust in PM May hits all-time low: Poll”.
Where “HITS all-time low” is general. How low? Where did it drop from? Over what time period?
The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
Under the false guise of familiarity, PM May” has been put forward in place of “Prime Minister Theresa May”, to make the subject drastically less searchable.
The duplicitous author put “Poll” on the end of the headline to give the subconscious of the reader the green light to say “oh, but that was just one poll!”
The propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
Confidence games, or “cons”, for short, are swindles in which a self-described con “artist” puts on fair guise and proceeds to take advantage of some wholly-credulous, trusting “rube”. This drop in trust in Britain’s Prime Minister, Theresa May signals the end of the confidence game.
In October 2017, Patheos explained “Why We Don’t Trust Congress”.
Confidence games, or “cons”, for short, are swindles in which a self-described con “artist” puts on fair guise and proceeds to take advantage of some wholly-credulous, trusting “rube”. This drop in trust in Congress signals the end of the confidence game.
In October 2017, Michelle Obama said “People Don’t Trust Politics’ Because GOP Is 'All Men, All White”.
The article continues to say that “Just 24 percent of Americans believe the country is heading in the right direction after a tumultuous stretch for President Donald Trump”.
They said “Poll:” in the headline to give your subconscious the green light to say “oh, but that’s just one poll!” The propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
Confidence games, or “cons”, for short, are swindles in which a self-described con “artist” puts on fair guise and proceeds to take advantage of some wholly-credulous, trusting “rube”. This drop in trust in Politics that she-man Michelle Obama is dissembling against signals the end of the confidence game. Joan Rivers was killed on the operating table shortly after joking openly about Michelle’s, er, gender choice.
In December 2017, EWN said “Survey: Most South African voters do not trust politicians”.
As an organ of the controlled press, they did what they could to hedge by using the general “most” in place of a far more impactful statistic. The author led the headline with “Survey:” to give your subconscious the green light to say “oh, but that’s just one survey!”
The populace of South Africa has recognized that the fox is in the henhouse. That the few are controlling the many by subterfuge.
The article goes on to say that “A quarter of those polled by the Institute for Justice and Reconciliation say they don’t feel close to any political party.”
Where the author hedged again by using “a quarter”, which is softer than “25%”.
Confidence games, or “cons”, for short, are swindles in which a self-described con “artist” puts on fair guise and proceeds to take advantage of some wholly-credulous, trusting “rube”. This drop in trust in Politicians by South African voters signals the end of the confidence game.The Edelman Trust Barometer from February 2020 set records for trust inequality. The mass population was 14% less trusting than they were in 2019. There were 23 markets with double-digit trust gaps.
“I do not have confidence that our current leaders will be able to successfully address our country’s challenges”
Religious leaders - 46%
Government leaders - 42%
The very wealthy - 36%
“Why you fool, it’s the educated reader who CAN be gulled. All our difficulty comes with the others. When did you meet a workman who believes the papers? He takes it for granted that they’re all propaganda and skips the leading articles. He buys his paper for the football results and the little paragraphs about girls falling out of windows and corpses found in Mayfair flats. He is our problem. We have to recondition him. But the educated public, the people who read the high-brow weeklies, don’t need reconditioning. They’re all right already. They’ll believe anything.”
From “That Hideous Strength”, by C.S. Lewis, 1945
TWO DIFFERENT TRUST REALITIES
Informed public - 3 of 4 institutions trusted (unmentioned is the fact that Government is the one that’s not trusted - ed)
Mass population - no institutions trusted
“The truest way to be deceived is to think oneself more knowing than others.”
― From “Maxims” by Francois de La Rochefoucauld, 1678
The genetically-related generational Satanists hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth are the haves, the educated, the wealthy, the advantaged. That’s why you see those groups holding most firmly to the Party Line, indeed, it’s why you see they are the ONLY group adhering to the psycho- and sociopathic Party Line. Not that every educated, wealthy or advantaged person is a generational Satanist. But most or all of the generational Satanists are educated, wealthy and advantaged, do you see?
Because they are conditioned to, people can grasp that the kindly, nattily-dressed old Italian gentleman feeding the pigeons is in fact a cold-blooded kingpin in a criminal organization comprised largely of people who are related to one another, a literal “crime family”. Yet a just as kindly, just as old and just as nattily-dressed Bernie Sanders or a Joe Biden gets a pass, because of that relentless good-cop, bad-cop programming.
You can only recognize them by the codified, highly-repetitive way in which they speak, and write.
They’re hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth, figuring the rubes would never notice.
You know them only-generally as “the One Percent”. They are the distinct and separate race that we know as “Neanderthal”. They’re all genetically related to one another. It’s a bloodline thing. As any middle schooler knows:
August 5, 2012 - 12 Year Old Girl Discovers All US Presidents Are Related to King John of England
They’re all related through the maternal bloodline.
Here’s what you’re supposed to think a Neanderthal looks like:
While this is what a Neanderthal actually looks like:
(King John I of England, the guy all the US Presidents are related to through their maternal bloodlines)
Apr 17, 2001 — Research leader Dr Rosalind Harding said: ‘It is certainly possible that red hair comes from the Neanderthals.’
2020 - “ScotlandsDNA believes that everyone who carries one of 3 variants of the red-hair gene is a direct descendant of the first redhead ever to have it”
January 31, 2008 - Blue-eyed humans have a single, common ancestor
It’s how the few have controlled the many, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
It’s why the ruling bloodlines of all the nations have the lightest skin.
We’re obviously going to have to recognize and come to terms with this if we’re going to make progress as a species. But they say that the hardest part of a problem is realizing that you have one.
In January 2018, Edelman.com said “Surveys Show Global Trust in Government at All-Time Low, Losing Ground Worldwide”.
Where the author put “surveys SHOW” on the front end of the headline so that the subconscious of the reader can say “oh, it was just one survey!”
The propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
“All-time low” and “LOSING ground” are both general hedges put forward to blunt and defray any specific insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
In January 2018, Business Insider said “Edelman ‘trust barometer’ finds 37-point drop in US public’s trust”.
Where the author put “FINDS 37-point drop” to give the subconscious of the reader the green light to say “oh, that’s just what the one survey found!”
The propagandist knows that many or most readers are eager to grasp any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The article continues: “Trust in US institutions, including the government and media, is imploding, according to the 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer published ahead of the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland. "No country saw steeper declines than the United States, with a 37-point aggregate drop in trust.”
The author does not, however, go on to offer any suggestion as to what had led to that drop, and, further made no mention of the fact that it was a record, the largest such drop in the history of the survey. Those are examples, respectively, of propaganda techniques known as “stonewalling” and “compartmentalization.”
The author said “37-POINT” drop because it’s less impactful than “37 percent drop”, and because getting “points” is a positive thing. That’s an example of what propagandists refer to as “spin”.
Confidence games, or “cons”, for short, are swindles in which a self-described con “artist” puts on fair guise and proceeds to take advantage of some wholly-credulous, trusting “rube”. This drop in trust in Britain’s Prime Minister, Theresa May signals the end of the confidence game.
In January 2018, the Washington Post said “After his gusher of lies, can anyone trust Trump?”. Which presents the farcical suggestion that scripted Bad-Cop Trump’s lie-percentage was or is any different than any of the hundreds of other career politicians surrounding him, or who line up behind him through all history, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
All of those politicians being united via their maternal bloodlines, mind you.
Surveys in January 2018 showed that, regardless of nation, trust in Government was at an all-time low.
In January 2018, a Veterans publication I can not surprisingly no longer locate said “Growing Distrust of Doctors: Huge Negative for America”. Where ‘“GROWING distrust” and “HUGE negative” are both general. They’re used to blunt any specific insight into the magnitude of the trends. The author has “compartmentalized” the phenomenon, as sixty to seventy readers only read the headlines, as the propagandist well knows.
“Huge negative for AMERICA” attempts to compartmentalize the internationally-occurring phenomenon merely to the United States.
In January 2018, Finance.Yahoo.com said “US suffers record drop in public trust as faith in China surges, survey says”.
Where “RECORD drop” and “faith in China SURGES” are both general.
The author tacked the snide “survey says” on the end to give the subconscious of the reader the green light to say “oh, but that was just one survey!”
The propagandist knows that many are most readers are eager to grasp any straw, however thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
Ceaseless propaganda is guiding us to the feet of our finally-revealed overlords, the Godless Communist Red Chinese. With the scripted Bad-Cop “US” driving the herd.
It’s also careful compartmentalization of the phenomenon merely to the U.S., to defray any awareness of the fact that trust in the government was dropping dropping steeply in all the nations at that very moment, regardless of culture or geography.
In Russia, trust in Putin dropped below 50% in July of 2018.
In June 2020, medium.com said “France is turning against its Republican Nobility”.
Can you see how they hedged a public that has turned against the con artists back to merely “turning” against them?
In August 2020, New York Magazine said “Voters are turning against Trump in areas hit hard by Covid”.
Can you see how they hedged a public that has turned against Trump back to merely “turning” against him? And how they hedge it back again to only in AREAS? And then back again to only in areas hit HARD. The population of Trump back-turners falls with each hedge.
That’s because the first rule of politics is “deny, deny, deny.”
In August 2020, U.C. Berkeley said “California Republicans are turning on Trump, poll finds”.
Can you see how they hedged Rebublicans that have already turned against Trump back to merely “turning” on him? And how they hedge it back again to only in California?
That’s because the first rule of politics is “deny, deny, deny.”
And can you see how they hedged “turning against Trump” to “turning ON Trump”? That spins it in Trump’s favor. Only a bad dog would TURN ON it’s master.
In July 2020, the U.K.'s Oxford Analytica said “Europeans increasingly view China as hostile following the COVID-19 pandemic.”
Where the oldest University in the English speaking world did what little it could to hedge by not specifying why, specifically Europeans were increasingly viewing the Chinese as hostile, or to what extent. They know that if they mentioned the rich history of Chinese bird and bat virus weaponization that things might go even worse for the rapidly-collapsing confidence game that Oxford plays its own part in.
In September 2020, the India Tribune explained “Why public opinion isn’t turning against government”.
Can you see how they hedged public opinion that has already turned against the government back to merely “turning”?
In October 2020, the irresistably-named “Alliance for Natural Health” widened its eyes to simulate honesty and asked “Is the tide of public opinion turning against governments?”
Hilariously, the author used the general “governments” to hedge, but it’s actually an honest statement. People have figured out that the fox is in the henhouse, regardless of national boundary.
The article continues: “As restrictions bite ever harder, is a once fearful and compliant population increasingly rejecting ‘project fear’?”
And the quote of the day is: “Rejecting Project Fear”. They said it, not me!
Can you see how they hedged a once fearful and compliant population that has already rejected Project Fear as merely being in the act of rejecting it?
In October 2020, the Star said “Finally, Christians are turning against Donald Trump”.
Can you see how they hedged Christians that have already rejected Donald Trump as merely being in the act of rejecting him?
That’s big news, in that, when wholly-credulous, mouth-breathing rubes were needed to go house to house in Iraq to kill innocent families under the guise of “protecting us all from Terrah”, it was mostly Christians stepped up. They would eat “freedom fries” at the mess hall in between morning and afternoon Death Squad operations. And when an obvious con artist promised to “make Uhmericuh Great Again”, while busily and obviously doing the exact opposite, who stepped up in support? The Christians. I was raised Christian, myself, so it’s particularly embarrassing to have my religion carry the day in terms of enabling the great confidence game that enslaves us all through excessive credulity.
“An abundance of caution” has been fashioned into the most fearsome weapon against humanity ever devised, and every last wholly-credulous rube is putting their change - and large checks - in the metaphorical collection plate as it comes by.
It’s not just Christians, of course. Wholly-credulous rube Jews, people of Islam, Inuit eskimo’s and any other subgroup you can name are doing their parts to abandon critical thinking at the request of nattily-dressed Establishment con artists.
In October 2020, the U.K.'s Independent stalled and said “Countdown to Brexit: How many days left until Britain leaves the EU***?***”
They’re blowing smoke to cover up the subhead: “Brexit: Public turning against Boris Johnson’s deal and blaming him for latest delay, poll finds”.
The author put “poll finds” at the end of the subhead to give the subconscious of the reader the green light to say “oh, but that’s just one poll!” The propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
“Only 19 per cent of voters believe agreement is good deal – and more hold prime minister responsible for delay than Labour. The public is turning against Boris Johnson’s deal and blaming him – rather than Labour – for the latest Brexit delay, a poll has found.”
The author satanically inverted it, to avoid saying “79% of voters believe the Prime Minister made a bad deal”.
The author put “a poll has found” at the end of the paragraph to give the subconscious of the reader the green light to say “oh, but that’s just one poll!” The propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The Illuminist talking-head shill “Boris Johnson” has been put forward as what the propagandist refers to as a “lightning rod”. Where that one, yes, conspirator does the damage to the populace that they were assigned to do, and then will later be rejected as “just one bad apple” and replaced by a new generational Satanist stage actor one election later.
They all use the same codified “secret” hand signs. In the future, grade school children will marvel how no one saw through such an obvious deception.
In both the U.K. and the U.S., the same persona is being used to swindle the people: stupid blonde hair, same moronic persona, same codified hand gestures, same suit. You have to study theater to understand, I guess.
But if only 20% of the populace is buying the con that Boris took office to serve the British people, and I’m guessing the rubes in the U.K. may be wising up to things on a more general level, hence “Public opinion is turning against lockdown and Labour’s cynical Covid opportunism”, from just two days ago.
If only 20 percent of the rubes you are attempting to work the con on are buying it, you’re not going to be running it much longer. You’ll be tarred, feathered, and run out of town tied to a rail.
Or that’s the way it used to be, anyway, prior to humanity losing its wits.
I think we’re turning the corner, right now.
If my thesis is correct that moral and mental health vary directly with that of the ether, then the great positive changes are going to continue to increase in speed and magnitude. There’s a lot of really positive stuff from April 2020 to now.
In January 2021, the propaganda film “Death to 2020” called the American Presidential election in 2020 “the last election in history”.
They’re going to try to drop the web, and force us back into a New Feudalism. The cutting off of many city streets has made it harder to drive. The addition of bike lanes has made it easier to bike. The “Covid did it” lengthening of mail times back to what they were when mail came across the ocean by ship. All social engineering.
All the confidence games are collapsing at once. Because when the school of fish, the flock of birds turns, they do so apparently as one.
Jeff Miller, Brooklyn, New York, January 15, 2020
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
You can access these articles online at https://forum.orgones.co.uk/c/positive-changes-that-are-occurring/
