This is a big one, lotta, lotta breakthroughs, here. I’m sending it now so no one can mess with it before I send it.
EXTINCT SPECIES ARE REAPPEARING, EXTANT SPECIES ARE RETURNING TO HABITAT’S THEY’D LONG ABANDONED, AND COMPLETELY NEW SPECIES ARE APPEARING
Great positive changes are underway at every level of our reality. They began in earnest in 2012, and have been increasing in speed and magnitude. I began writing this series of articles, entitled “Positive Changes That Are Occurring”, in July of 2013.
These historically-unprecedented positive changes are being driven by many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices based on Wilhelm Reich’s work.
Since Don Croft first fabricated tactical Orgonite in 2000, its widespread, ongoing and ever-increasing distribution has been unknitting and transforming the ancient Death energy matrix built and expanded by our dark masters, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. And, as a result, the Ether is returning to its natural state of health and vitality.
One of those changes is that extinct species are reappearing, extant species are returning to habitats they’d long abandoned, and completely new species are appearing as a result of the return to health of the wider Etheric environment.
Since these statements directly refute our State Religion, which holds not only that “Poor Mother Gaia is Dying”, but also that and species evolve exclusively through time-intensive, mechanistic processes referred to as “Darwinism”, I’ve put together this somewhat lengthy article to document my assertions. By the way: you can tell it’s a religion not a science because it’s got “ism” on the end of it.
The other day, I joked to my wife that, like in Mike Judge’s 2006 movie “Idiocracy”, a completely average person such as myself had become the world’s most astute Naturalist.
In May 2005, California’s trib.com said “Grass species ‘ not seen since 1912 ’ found on Catalina Island”.
In August 2008, BBC news Devon, England said “ ‘ Rare ’ jellyfish is spotted in cove”.
Where, under false guise of familiarity, the headline omits any indication of the location, to make the subject virtually unsearchable.
The article continues: “Mr Lavis, who still lives in the bungalow he was born in, said he had not seen ‘ any ’ of the jellyfish in the cove ‘ for nearly 50 years ’. ‘ An ’ aquarium said it was ‘ not unheard of ’ for them to be found.”
The fact that is says “ ‘an’ aquarium, versus the name of an aquarium, along with the name and title of the person being quoted, shows us that ‘not unheard of for them to be found” is completely made up, out of whole cloth. They’re a Trusted Authority figure, telling the Big Lie with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.
In the headline, “ ‘rare’ jellyfish is, counterintuitively, a hedge. In that “never” seen is stronger than something only “rarely” seen.
Jellyfish are booming and burgeoning in Devon, England to a level not seen in Mr. Lavis’ lifetime.
In January 2009, the U.K.’s Telegraph said “A ‘ butterfly ’ that has ‘ not been seen in the wild in Britain since the Second World War ’ is breeding again in the UK”.
Where the general “butterfly” is used as a hedge against providing the actual name of the Butterly, which, in journalistic parlance, the author has “buried” in the article below. Propagandists know that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, so this tactic “compartmentalizes” the information with an effectiveness shown by the spectacular, conditioned ignorance of the majority of the populace.
As a bonus, it also makes the subject virtually unsearchable.
Since I originally researched this article in 2016, a paywall’s been put in place, so I don’t know what type of butterfly it was. The paywall is coming into prominence as a compartmentalization tactic, and I believe it may presage an attempted dropping of the Internet, to get us back a far more Feudal and ensheepling way of living. The amount of damage I’ve done just with this single publication is extraordinary.
In May 2009, cryptozoo-oscity said “ ‘ Rare ’ ‘ animal’ found, ‘ not seen since 1990 ’ ”.
Where ‘rare’ animal is, counterintuitively, a hedge. In that “never” seen is stronger than something only “rarely” seen. The general “animal” is used as a hedge against providing the actual name of the, er, animal, which, in journalistic parlance, the author has “buried” in the article below. Propagandists know that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, so this tactic “compartmentalizes” the information with an effectiveness shown by the spectacular, conditioned ignorance of the majority of the populace.
The article continues: “One of the world’s ‘ most elusive ’ ‘ mammals ’ has ‘ revealed itself ’.”
Breathe through your mouth and affirm that “It carefully hid, but then it ‘revealed itself’ “.
Now, the author has moved to the general hedge “mammal”, still walking you down from the previous and also general “animal”. “Most elusive” implies that the lack of sightings for decades was merely the result of slipshod searching. That the “mammal” is said to have “revealed itself” is complex. On one level, it’s a Middle Ages, mouth-breather thing to say. Yet it may be the cold truth - that species are reappearing in our environment as the Ether continues to improve in health to a level where their lives can be sustained. Even to the point of “winking back into existence”, from our perspective. The mechanics of life in this dimension and others not being precisely as we’ve been told. But that’s just speculation.
The article continues: “Footprints and scat belonging to the Visayan spotted deer have been found deep in the Philippines jungle.”
They’ve “buried” the name of the deer deep, deep in the article. What percentage of readers do you think made it here, when 70% only read the headlines?
It doesn’t cheer me in regard to the prospects for this book, however Victor Hugo said that nothing is stronger than an idea whose time has come.
In November 2010, Latest Stories said ”Pictures: “Mr. Burns” Toad, More ‘ New ’ Amphibians Found”.
The article goes on to say “A beaked amphibian said to resemble The Simpsons’ Mr. Burns and a poison dart frog are among new species ‘ discovered ’ in Colombia.”
An ABC News story from December 2010 says “ Plant ‘ species ’ not seen in a decade, ‘ found ’ in ‘ outback ’ “.
Where, under the false guise of familiarity, the author omitted “Australia” from the headline, to make the subject drastically less searchable. Plant “species” is general, and is used as a hedge against using the name of the plant. Propagandists know that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, so this tactic “compartmentalizes” the data with an effectiveness shown by the spectacular, conditioned ignorance of the majority of the populace.
“Found” in outback implies that no one searched for it with enough effectiveness previously.
The article continues: “Over 60 seed collections, including a plant ‘ species ’ not seen since 2000, were found on a recent field expedition to the far west.”
This boring repetition of the general meme “plant ‘species’ “ is to try to get you to stop reading, without having learned very much.
The article continues “The New South Wales Seedbank spent 12 days in the region, discovering the ‘ rare ’ Swainsona species near Broken Hill.”
After finally coughing up the name of the plant, the author hedges again by saying that the presumedly-extinct Swansona is only “rare”.
A Seedbank assistant, Graeme Errington, says the species has not been seen in the area for 10 years, and it is the only known site in the state.
“Mr Errington says recent ‘ good ’ rains have helped the species flourish again after the drought.” What were the precise geophysical mechanisms by which the presumedly dormant Swansona was revivified? The author offers no clue, and I would add that pouring water on ten year old dead grass does not bring that grass back to life, not even in the Middle Ages. The author hedges the greatness of historically unprecedented rainfall back to merely “good”.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. Three of those variants are “spectacular”, “unique”, “mysterious“ and ”bizarre”.
That’s why a phys.org article from May 2011, phys.org said “ ‘ Spectacular ’ mammal ‘ rediscovered ’ after 113 years – first ever photographs taken”
And it’s why the article went on to say “A ‘ unique ’ and ‘ mysterious ’ guinea-pig-sized rodent, ‘ not seen since 1898 ’ despite ‘ several ’ ‘ organized ’ searches, ‘ bizarrely ’ showed up at the front door of an ecolodge at a nature reserve in Colombia, South America.”
For the record, they’re talking about Columbia, in South America.
“Unique” states clearly that it’s the only living example on Earth. Which doesn’t seem logical, but rather like a hedge.
The headline takes care to omit the name, saying only ‘spectacular mammal’, so the the subject will be as unsearchable and general as possible. The next line also omits the name, offering only the again-general “guinea pig ‘ sized ’ rodent”.
Propagandists know that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, so this tactic “compartmentalizes” the information with an effectiveness shown by the spectacular, conditioned ignorance of the majority of the populace.
The author makes the bravely Victorian claim that the as-yet unknown rodent was “rediscovered”, which is, to use their own words, bizarre, in that not only were several searches previously made, they were, furthermore “organized” searches. I’d love to read about the unorganized searches some time. There weren’t any, actually - it’s a made-up lie, otherwise the dates would have been used, thanks to strict journalistic convention.
The article continues: The magnificent red-crested tree rat (Santamartamys rufodorsalis), stayed for almost two hours while two research volunteers took the first photos ever of a creature the world thought would never be seen again.”
Having at last coughed up the tree rat’s name, they say that it was previously thought to be extinct, and offer no insight as to why or how it’s suddenly back.
In June 2011, globaltree.com said “ ‘ Rare ’ tree ‘ not seen since 1955 ’ ‘ re-discovered ’ in Sabah, Malaysia”.
In the headline, “ ‘ rare ’ tree is, counterintuitively, a hedge. In that “never” seen is stronger than something only “rarely” seen. Something that hasn’t been seen in a half Century is not rare, it is considered to be extinct.
It hedges a second time in that “rare” tree is a way to not say the tree’s actual name, to make the subject as unsearchable as possible, and the topic as boring, general and uninformative as possible. The author makes the bravely Victorian claim that the as-yet unknown tree was “rediscovered” implies that no one searched for it with enough effectiveness previously.
The article continues: “Not seen since 1955, Dipterocarpus lamellatus, commonly known as ‘Keruing Jarang’, was found during a survey of the area by a research team from the Forestry Department”.
Here’s the tree they couldn’t find for fifty years:
They finally coughed up the name, but now I’m stopped by a paywall that wasn’t in place when I first researched the article in 2016. It’s coming into prominence as a compartmentalization tactic, and I believe it may presage an attempted dropping of the Internet, to get us back a far more Feudal and ensheepling way of living. The amount of damage I’ve done just with this single publication is extraordinary.
In July 2013, NBC Los Angeles said “ ‘ Rare ’ Jellyfish With 25-Foot Long Tentacles ‘ Appears ’ in California”.
Where the general “rare” is used as a hedge providing the name of the Jellyfish. Propagandists know that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, so this tactic “compartmentalizes” the information with an effectiveness shown by the spectacular, conditioned ignorance of the majority of the populace.
“Appears” is complex. On one level, it’s a Middle Ages, mouth-breather thing to say. Yet it may be the cold truth - that species are reappearing in our environment as the Ether continues to improve in health to a level where their lives can be sustained. Even to the point of “winking back into existence”, from our perspective. The mechanics of life in this dimension and others not being precisely as we’ve been told. But that’s just speculation.
The article continues: “Several swimmers at a Southern California beach were stung by the ‘ rare ’ Black Jellyfish, a marine animal who’s tentacles can grow up to 30 feet long. … A breed not seen since 1920 reemerges and ‘ scientists ’ link it to ‘ global warming ’ ‘ ? ’
Where the general “scientists” is proof that no scientists were, in fact consulted for the article. Otherwise they’d have been quoted and named, according to strict journalistic rules. It’s just made up bluster from the generational Satanist propagandist at NBC Los Angeles. Not everyone at NBC Los Angeles is a generational Satanist, but all of them that write articles that get to the newswire.
We’ve also learned that ‘rare’ was used as a hedge a second time in the headline, in that something that shows up once every hundred years is beyond merely ‘rare’.
The fact that there’s a question mark behind the “global warming” plausible-deniability excuse is that the propaganda is well past its sell-by date, and is now back to trial-balloon status.
In October 2013, qz.com Satanically inverts a jellyfish population booming and burgeoning to unprecedented health as “ Jellyfish are taking over the seas, and it might be too late to stop them ”.
In November 2013, the U.K.’s Daily Mail wrote of “The Cookii ‘ monster ’: Huge ‘ deadly ’ pink jellyfish has been ‘discovered ’ “
The article continues: “A jellyfish with a powerfully toxic sting has been rediscovered more than 100 years after the last recorded sighting of it. The ‘incredibly rare ’ Crambione Cookii has not been seen since 1910 but has been recently ‘ spotted ’ off the coast of Queensland, Australia, where it was captured.”
The servants of Death did what they could by immediately capturing and killing the creature, and the Mouthpiece of the State dubbed the jellyfish had been “spotted” and then “captured”. They falsely call it a “discovery” in the headline, then walk that back to “rediscovered”. They shook the “discovery” doll to distract you from the fact that it apparently winked back into existence.
“Incredibly rare”, while lurid, is still a hedge back from “previously thought extinct”.
In January 2014, news.mongabay.com said “ Not seen in over 130 years , ’ extinct ’ frog ‘ rediscovered ’ in Sri Lanka”.
A ‘ small ’ toad not seen since 1876, and considered by many to be extinct, has been ‘ rediscovered ’ in a stream in Sri Lanka
They threw “ small ” toad on there as chaff, so could imagine “oh, so small, so hard to ‘ see ’ “.
The author makes the bravely Victorian claim that the as-yet unknown frog or “small” toad was “rediscovered” implies that no one searched for it with enough effectiveness previously.
The article goes on to say: “In 1876—the same year that the first telephone call was made—the British scientist Albert Günther described a ‘ new ’ species of frog from Sri Lanka, but the species, known as ‘the webless shrub frog’ (Pseudophilautus hypomelas), was never ‘ seen ’ again.”
The author said never ‘seen’ again to imply that no one had searched for it with the proper assiduousness previously.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “disappeared”.
That’s why, having finally coughed up the name of the webs lessshrub frog that they’re professionally obfuscating, the author went on to say “
“Having ‘ disappeared ’ into history, scientists considered the species extinct—that is until a 2010 expedition stumbled on 40 ‘ mystery ’ frogs.”
It’s a “mystery” to them because they don’t want to admit that species are reappearing in our environment as the Ether continues to improve in health to a level where their lives can be sustained. Even to the point of “winking back into existence”, from our perspective. The mechanics of life in this dimension and others not being precisely as we’ve been told.
A “Seeker” story from March 2015 says “ ‘Extinct’ Bird ‘ Not Seen Since 1941 ’ Suddenly ‘ Reappears ’ “.
Under the false guise of familiarity, the headline omits any mention of where the author is talking about, or what sort of bird they’re talking about. Propagandists know that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, so this tactic “compartmentalizes” the information with an effectiveness shown by the spectacular, conditioned ignorance of the majority of the populace.
In the headline, “reappears” is complex. On one level, it’s a Middle Ages, mouth-breather thing to say. Yet it may be the cold truth - that species are reappearing in our environment as the Ether continues to improve in health to a level where their lives can be sustained. Even to the point of “winking back into existence”, from our perspective. The mechanics of life in this dimension and others not being precisely as we’ve been told. But that’s just speculation.
The author makes the bravely Victorian claim that the as-yet unknown bird was “rediscovered” implies that no one searched for it with enough effectiveness previously.
The headline takes care to omit the name, saying only ‘extinct bird’, so the the subject will be as unsearchable and general as possible. It’s a hedge against providing the name of the bird. Propagandists know that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, so this tactic “compartmentalizes” the information with an effectiveness shown by the spectacular, conditioned ignorance of the majority of the populace.
The article continues: “A Jerdon’s babbler has been spotted in Myanmar for the first time ‘ in nearly a quarter century .”
Wait, what? The headline clearly says “since 1941”. The article was written in 2015. That’s 74 years previously. The author just changed it to “nearly a quarter century”. That’s how the Ministry of Truth rolls, these days, and the populace is, indeed, too stupid or lazy to catch them at it. Until the new Sheriff showed up in town.
I watched “High Plains Drifter” the other night. Kind of like that. Except, thinking it through, the dwarf Mordecai, played by Billy Curtis, was the Sheriff.
I’m the vengeance-wielding high plains drifter.
And now, back to the vengeance. We just learned that, in 2015, Jordan’s babbler “reappeared” in Myanmar, not having been seen since 1941. While, in September 2010, the Australian said “Last week Conservation International reported that its scientists had ‘ rediscovered ’ three species of amphibians, including a Mexican salamander ‘ not seen since 1941 ’ ”. While in January 2009, the U.K.’s Telegraph said “A ‘butterfly’ that has not been seen in the wild in Britain ‘ since the Second World War ’ is breeding again in the UK”.
Compressing the story for you: the Death energy level in the Ether got pumped up with World War II, and didn’t drop back down to healthy levels until 2010 or so, as the widespread distribution of simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices based upon Wilhelm Reich’s work brought the Ether back to it’s ages-long state of health and vitality. With the Jellyfish one of the metaphorical “canaries in the coal mine”.
It was one of my earliest and biggest discoveries as a Naturalist, linking the Death energy of world wars to rises and falls in the salmon population in the Pacific. I’m guessing 2014. It was a post in my “Positive Changes That Are Occurring” thread on Don Croft’s old forum.
We’ll see if it surfaces as I go through my historical material. If not it will take half an hour to put another one together.
In April 2015, the U.K.’s Express said “ ‘ Rare ’ animals ‘ not seen in Britain for centuries ’ make a comeback”.
Where the general “rare” is used as a hedge providing the name of the animals. Propagandists know that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, so this tactic “compartmentalizes” the information with an effectiveness shown by the spectacular, conditioned ignorance of the majority of the populace.
“Last year the first wild beavers to be ‘ discovered ’ in England for 500 years were found living on the banks of the river Otter in Devon. Another population has also ‘ established itself ’ on the river Tay near Dundee, more than four centuries since beavers were hunted to extinction in the British Isles for their fur.”
The author makes the bravely Victorian claim that the as-yet unknown “rare” animal was “discovered” implies that no one searched for it with enough effectiveness previously. We’re told “another” population has “established itself” on the Tay. When did it establish itself? How did it do so? Where did it come from? What is the size of the generally-described “population”?
It may be that species are reappearing in our environment as the Ether continues to improve in health to a level where their lives can be sustained. “Winking back into existence”, from our perspective. The mechanics of life in this dimension and others not being precisely as we’ve been told. But that’s just speculation.
The biggest of the many reasons that research into Sasquatch and “Lake Monsters” is forbidden is the evidence of interdimensionality on the part of those species.
This beaver story is of particular interest because it’s our second “Devon” data point. Beavers and jellyfish in Devon, England are booming and burgeoning to an unprecedented level.
In February 2016, the U.K.’s Daily Mail said “Basilewsky’s cranefly declared extinct 50 years ago is ‘ found ’ on St. Helena”.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “gobsmacked”.
That’s why the alternate title of the article is “I’m not dead! Cranefly declared extinct 50 years ago is ‘ rediscovered ’ after landing on the hand of a ‘ gobsmacked ’ biologist.
The author avers that the presumedly extinct cranefly was “found”, then, more regally, “rediscovered”.
The author makes the bravely Victorian claim that the “found” I mean “rediscovered” implies that no one searched for it with enough effectiveness previously.
In this case, the cranefly clearly came and “found” the biologist, whose “gobsmacked” state clearly proves he was not assiduously searching for craneflies. To the accurate term would be “cranefly ‘reappears’ on St. Helena”.
While the Coincidence Theorist will assert that the biologist was, indeed searching for extinct craneflies, when one coincidentally landed on his hand, leaving him understandably gobsmacked.
“Found” and “rediscovered” are cover memes for “reappeared”. n the headline, species are reappearing in our environment as the Ether continues to improve in health to a level where their lives can be sustained. “Winking back into existence”, from our perspective. With the mechanics of life in this dimension and others not being precisely as we’ve been told. But that’s just speculation.
In June 2016, BirdLife said “Spix’s Macaw ‘ reappears ’ in Brazil”.
In the headline, “reappears” is complex. On one level, it’s a Middle Ages, mouth-breather thing to say. Yet it may be the cold truth - that species are reappearing in our environment as the Ether continues to improve in health to a level where their lives can be sustained. Even to the point of “winking back into existence”, from our perspective. With the mechanics of life in this dimension and others not being precisely as we’ve been told. But that’s just speculation.
The article continues: “It was Grandpa Pinpin’s dream: to see his favourite bird, Spix’s Macaw, fly again over the skies of Curaçá, small town of about 20,000, in the dry Caatinga area in Bahia, Brazil, where goat herding is the main activity. Pinpin Oliveira passed away last year, age 94, his wish unfulfilled. But the baton was passed to his 16 year old grand-daughter, Damily, who not only saw the macaw, ‘ not seen in the wild since 2000’ , but also managed to film it with her mobile phone.”
The fact that it had not been seen in the wild since 2000 is of great interest, in that is right when the literal forest of Death energy-based Etheric weaponry that also carries cell phone traffic and weather radar data was thrown up seemingly overnight in all the nations.
In December 2016, Australia’s goodwindiargus.com said “ ‘ Endangered ’ species ‘ not seen since 1981 ’ discovered ‘ on travelling stock route ’.”
Where, under the false guise of familiarity, the author omitted any mention as to where the also-unnamed “species” was, er, “discovered”. In an environment where sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines this tactic of generalization “compartmentalizes” the subject with an effectiveness shown by the spectacular, conditioned ignorance of the majority of the populace.
I’m sorry, but a species not seen in 35 years is quite clearly extinct, not merely “endangered”, as falsely claimed. “Endangered” is a hedge.
“ ‘ Threatened ’ species have been discovered on Travelling Stock Routes (TSR) in north-west NSW ‘ including ’ a rare black-striped wallaby not previously seen since 1981.”
I’m sorry, but a species not seen in 35 years is quite clearly extinct, not merely “threatened”, as falsely claimed. “Threatened” is a hedge.
The “hit-piece” is trying to blunt awareness of many species winking back into existence, hence “threatened species”, plural, “including” the wallaby. So they only mentioned one, probably the least dramatic. As if species reappearing in this dimension could be undramatic.
What underscores the truth of what I’m saying is that the folks in charge love, and I mean love to tell you how bad nature is doing, to the point where they lie and exaggerate about it to an extreme level, as I’ve documented in hundreds if not thousands of examples. So their downplaying of how rare or threatened a creature is simply isn’t possible. It’s not their Modus Operandi .
In February 2017, the U.K.’s Independent said “ ‘ Frog ’ not seen ‘ in decades ’ ‘ discovered ’ in Africa”.
It’s a queasy little hedge-fest. Where the general “frog” is used as a hedge providing the name of the animal. Propagandists know that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, so this tactic “compartmentalizes” the information with an effectiveness shown by the spectacular, conditioned ignorance of the majority of the populace.
The author makes the bravely Victorian claim that the as-yet unknown frog was “discovered” implies that no one searched for it with enough effectiveness previously.
The article continues: “Researchers ‘ track down ’ four ‘cave squeakers’, a breed ‘ first spotted ’ in 1962 but not seen since.”
We’ve now learned that the headline’s “discovered” is incorrect, in that the creature we now know to be the cave squeaker was, in fact, discovered in 1962 and thus “ rediscovered ” in 2017.
But even using their hedging qualifier “discovered” for something that is clearly extinct is some brazen Black magic bullshit. I’m sorry, but a species not seen in 55 years is quite clearly extinct.
The bullshit continues with “researchers ‘ track down ’ “, which implies that someone finally searched for it with enough effectiveness.
The limp “first ‘spotted’ “ plays like it wasn’t an official “discovery”, but rather only a “spotting”.
In February 2017, kcci.com said “Trail Camera In Iowa ‘ Spots ’ ‘ Mammal ’ ‘ Not Seen Since 1800s ’ ”
Where the general “mammal” is used as a hedge against providing the creature’s actual name. That’s to make the subject far less searchable, and also because propagandists know that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, so this tactic “compartmentalizes” the information with an effectiveness shown by the spectacular, conditioned ignorance of the majority of the populace.
The article continues: “A small and ‘ furry ’ yet ‘ fierce ’ mammal called a ‘ fisher ’ has been ‘ spotted ’ in Iowa for the first time in ‘ roughly ’ 150 years.”
Where “furry” “fierce” “fisher” puts the animal’s name at the end of three “F’s”, so that you’ll totally be unable to remember the name. “Spots”, repeated for emphasis as “Spotted” holds out the canard that it’s simply that no one looked assiduously enough, previously. Versus the truth, that the species literally “winked back into existence” when the Etheric environment reached a point where its life could be sustained.
“In ‘roughly’ 150 years” is yet another hedge, as if a decade or two would matter in the point of the subject under discussion. It’s just to keep your mind stopping, and stuttering, and in a questioning state as it stops reading.
In March 2017, Latest Stories said “ ‘Extinct’ ‘ Mountain ’ Dogs ‘Rediscovered’ in ‘ the Wild ’.
Where, under the false guise of familiarity, the headline omits any mention of geography, and also takes care to omit the name of the dog.
Propagandists know that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, so this tactic “compartmentalizes” the subject with an effectiveness shown by the spectacular, conditioned ignorance of the majority of the populace.
“Unseen for more than 50 years, the New Guinea highland wild dog has at last been ‘ confirmed in its natural island habitat ’ ”.
Where “for more than 50 years” is a general hedge. Now that we’re into the article that 70% of the populace will never read, we’re allowed to know it is the New Guinea highland wild dog.
The author makes the bravely Victorian claim that the extinct dog was in fact “rediscovered” implies that no one searched for it with enough effectiveness previously. Here’s the dog everyone who was assiduously looking for it purportedly missed over a half century:
The author lies that the dog has “at last ” been ‘ confirmed in its natural island habitat ’, which is a brazen lie in that the island is where they were discovered in the first place.
Say what you will about them, there’s no quit in these guys, and of course gals. Yet such gambits only turn back upon those using them once exposed by someone such as myself.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “surprised”.
That’s why a bbc.com article from April 2017 is headlined “ ‘ Cave fish ’ found in ’ surprise discovery’ for first time in Europe”.
And why the article goes on to say that “Europe’s first cave-dwelling fish has been discovered in a surprise ‘ find ’ by a diver in Germany after being ‘ hidden from human sight for millennia ’.”
Where, under the false guise of familiarity, the headline omits any mention of specific geography, and also takes care to omit the name of the fish.
Propagandists know that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, so this tactic “compartmentalizes” the subject with an effectiveness shown by the spectacular, conditioned ignorance of the majority of the populace.
The author widened their eyes and said “surprise find ” with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty, implying that it’s only no one searched for it assiduously enough previously. The point is hammered home again with “ hidden from human sight for millennia ”, which is a plausible-deniability excuse to take your eyes off the larger trend that I’m elucidating here, namely that the species winked into existence as the Etheric environment improved to the point where that life form could be supported. Or so I surmise.
If you’re still playing the violin for the science team, I’ll note that the author here still hasn’t mentioned the name of the fish. For the record, it’s the cave loach.
In May 2017, National Geographic said “ ‘ Extinct ’ ‘ Venomous ’ Snake ‘ Rediscovered ’ ”.
Under the false guise of familiarity, the headline omits any mention of where the author is talking about, or what sort of snake they’re talking about, other than that it is “venomous”. Since the venomous has three syllables, just pronouncing it in one’s mind will make most readers feel like intellectuals, and will definitely distract them from the fact that the shill is hiding the snake’s name.
Propagandists know that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, so this tactic “compartmentalizes” the information with an effectiveness shown by the spectacular, conditioned ignorance of the majority of the populace.
The author makes the bravely Victorian claim that the as-yet unknown snake was “rediscovered” implies that no one searched for it with enough effectiveness previously.
The article continues: “An ‘extinct’ venomous snake was rediscovered in South Africa in 2017. The team found four live animals. Only 12 individuals have been recorded since the species was identified in 1937.”
1937, right before the Death energy of World War II snuffed them out of existence. It may be that species are reappearing in our environment as the Ether continues to improve in health to a level where their lives can be sustained. “Winking back into existence”, from our perspective. With the mechanics of life in this dimension and others not being precisely as we’ve been told. But that’s just speculation.
In June 2017, National Geographic said “ ’ Faceless ’ Fish Seen for First Time in Over a Century”.
Which is why the subhead reads “The ‘ mysterious ’, gelatinous ‘ animal ’ was pulled up from the ocean deep.”
Since I originally researched this article in 2016, a paywall’s been put in place. It’s coming into prominence as a compartmentalization tactic, and I believe it may presage an attempted dropping of the Internet, to get us back a far more Feudal and ensheepling way of living. The amount of damage I’ve done just with this single publication is extraordinary.
I had to research another article to learn “Though scientists initially thought the deep-sea creature might be a new species, further research revealed that the fish is a species of ‘ cusk eel ’ (Typhlonus nasus) that has not been seen in Australian waters since the late 1800s.”
We’ve now learned that the cusk eel was incorrectly referred to in the headline as “faceless fish”, and in the subhead as “mysterious animal”. They’ve taken you off on a breadcrumb trail from “fish” to “animal”, all the while to keep you from researching or thinking about cusk eels that just winked back into existence in the ocean off of Australia.
“Seen” for the first time in a over a century clearly implies that no one had ever looked for it with sufficient assiduousness previously.
In July 2017, AOL News said “New species of ‘ sunfish ’ ‘ discovered ’ in New Zealand”.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “unexpected”.
That’s why the body of the article begins with “ ‘ Of all things ’, Marianne Nygard ‘ didn’t expect ’ to find a new species of sunfish - the heaviest of all bony fishes.”
They’re meeting that objection right up front because the Big Lie of the article is “generations of researchers simply missed the truck-sized fish previously”.
The article goes on to underscore my point with “Previously undescribed, it’s called the Hoodwinker Sunfish (Mola tecta). The fish has ‘ long-eluded ’ recognition from researchers, despite the species weighing in excess of two tons, and growing to three meters in length.”
The careful, crafty truck-sized fish “ ‘ long ’ eluded researchers”.
The article continues: “ ’A Japanese research group first found ‘genetic evidence’ of an unknown sunfish species in Australian waters ten years ago, but the fish kept eluding the scientific community because ‘ we didn’t know what it looked like ’ ”, Ms. Nyegarrd said in a statement.”
Wait, what? Found “genetic evidence”? They found a lone scale on the bottom and took it back to the lab for testing? That’s pure, unadulterated bullshit. The stonewalling Japanese found one, redacted it back later to “genetic evidence”.
Hilariously, the Illuminist shill quoted in the mainstream news article said they couldn’t find the truck sized fish because “they didn’t know what it looked like”. They saw it plenty of previous times, only they passed over it, because they didn’t have a mug shot or witness sketch.
Here’s the slow-moving, truck-sized fish that “eluded” them:
To maintain current programming levels, stop reading immediately and affirm that they couldn’t find it previously because they “didn’t know what it looked like”.
The Hoodwinker Sunfish winked into existence for the first time in recorded history in 2007, and the establishment lied as hard as they could about it for a decade, until it had to be photographed in 2017. It wasn’t until three years later, in 2020, when Jeff Miller blew the story open.
In July 2017, theonion.com said “ ‘ Fish ’ Species ‘ Not Seen Since 1960s ’ Thinks It Can Waltz Back Into Marine Biologist’s Life Just Like That”.
Where the headline deliberately makes no mention of the geography, and also carefully omits the name of the fish. Propagandists know that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, so this tactic “compartmentalizes” the subject with an effectiveness shown by the spectacular, conditioned ignorance of the majority of the populace.
The article continues “Apparently thinking nothing of casually showing up in its ecosystem ‘ as if everything was hunky-dory ’, the blackfin cisco, a fish species not seen since the 1960s, reportedly thought it could waltz back into local marine biologist Margie Kremlow’s life on Wednesday just like that.”
Where the author has said that the still-unnamed ecosystem of the now-named fish was not doing well, at the very moment that it was in a spectacular state of health not seen in over fifty years. It’s the Big Lie, told with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty under the false guise of humor.
They’re doing everything they can to distract from the truth that species are reappearing in our environment as the Ether continues to improve in health to a level where their lives can be sustained. “Winking back into existence”, from our perspective. With the mechanics of life in this dimension and others not being precisely as we’ve been told. But that’s just speculation.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why a National Geographic article from August 2017 said “ ‘ Mysterious ’ Amazon ‘ Animal ’ ‘ Seen ’ ‘ Alive ’ ‘ for First Time in 80 Years ”.
In addition to hedging by omitting the name of the “mystery” creature, the headline hedges again by saying “seen alive for first time in 80 years”.
Where “seen” implies that no one previously looked assiduously enough, and “seen ‘alive’ “ implies that plenty of dead ones have been found around.
The subhead reads “The ‘ cowl-haired creature ’ was first ‘ spotted ’ in the 1930s but ‘ has eluded scientists ever since ’.”
The headline’s “mystery animal” has been morphed just-less-elusively into “cowl-haired creature”. It was just barely “spotted” in the 30’s, and, as the most devious mystery cowl-haired creature in history, has eluded scientists ever since, despite their searching with proper assiduousness.
The article continues: “A rare monkey, the Vanzolini’s bald-faced saki, has been seen in the wild for the first time in over 80 years”.
Before they finally spit out “monkey”, which they had to quick say as a hedge against the actual name, they tacked on ‘rare’, which is a bald-faced lie, in that animals not seen in 80 years are extinct, versus merely “rare”, as falsely alleged. The author piles on with “has not been seen ‘ in the wild ’ “ to falsely imply that there are scads of them, only in Zoos. Not been “seen” in the wild” again falsely implies that no one looked with proper assiduousness previously.
In September 2017, Gizmodo said “Jerk Humans Immediately Shoot First Wild Bison ‘ Seen ’ in Germany for 250 years”.
The article natters on at length about the shooting, but doesn’t mention why the extinct bison was suddenly seen once again, or mention anything about that stunning, historically-unprecedented turn of events.
“Seen” bravely avers that people in Germany simply weren’t looking assiduously enough previously, and if there’s one thing we know about Germans, it is that they are assiduous, about everything. I’m of German descent, by the way.
Here’s the bison that everyone was purportedly looking for over hundreds of years but didn’t find until 2017:
In September 2017, The Local said “Wild wolf cubs born in Rome ‘ for the first time in 100 years ’ ”.
What’s changed? It’s energetic, it’s Etheric. When the level of Death energy in an environment gets to a certain level, fewer and fewer organisms can exist there without having their lives drastically shortened. The wolves take off, while the humans live on in denial about it, even though the ills of the city are clearly documented in ways that can not be fully explained by mechanical causality. Wild wolves have returned to Rome because the Etheric environment there is as healthy as it’s been in a century.
In September 2017, ohiodominican.edu said “Students ‘ Find ’ Fish Never Before ‘ Seen ’ in Alum Creek”.
Where, under the false guise of familiarity, the headline omits the name of the city, and state, along with the name of the fish, all to make the subject as unsearchable and general as possible. Propagandists know that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, so this tactic “compartmentalizes” the data with an effectiveness shown by the spectacular, conditioned ignorance of the majority of the populace.
The story continues: “An Ohio Dominican University Ichthyology class has ‘ found ’ a ‘ species ’ of fish in Alum Creek for the first time in history.”
“One of Ohio’s two smallest species of fish, Tippecanoe Darters are listed as a state-threatened species, which the Ohio Department of Natural Resources defines as being “a species or subspecies whose survival in Ohio is not in immediate jeopardy, but to which a threat exists. Continued or increased stress will result in its becoming endangered.”
There’s some good stuff in there, beyond the Mouthpiece of the State falsely stating that the darter that’s booming and burgeoning to an historically-unprecented level is threatened, and heading for “endangered”.
“Find” and “found” repeat the meme that no one ever searched for them with sufficient assiduousness for all of history, up until now. They put it forward with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty. “Never before ‘ seen ’ “ repeats the meme yet again.
In November 2017, ScienceDail said “First wild alligator snapping turtle in Illinois since 1984”.
An animal that hasn’t been seen in close to forty years is extinct in that region. What’s changed? It’s energetic, it’s Etheric. When the level of Death energy in an environment gets to a certain level, fewer and fewer organisms can exist there without having their lives drastically shortened. The alligator snapping turtles take off, while the humans live on in denial about it, even though the ills of the city are clearly documented in ways that can not be fully explained by mechanical causality. Wild alligator snapping turtles have returned to Illinois because the Etheric environment there is as healthy as it’s been in close to 40 years.
In November 2017, knoxnews.com said “TVA biologist, ‘ Yale professor ’ find new ‘ fish ’ found only in Tennessee”.
That’s some big-ass fish to come out of nowhere into a Tennessee creek.
The headline uses the general “fish” is used as a hedge against the use of the name of the fish. That’s to make the subject less searchable, but moreso because propagandists know that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, so this tactic “compartmentalizes” the information with an effectiveness shown by the spectacular, conditioned ignorance of the majority of the populace.
In journalistic parlance, the author has hedged by “burying” the fish’s name in the subhead below: “Behold the Tennessee Logperch.”
The article continues: “The fish, a darter, can grow to be 6 inches long. It has flattened little splotches on its flanks. That the splotches are flattened is important; those are what first led TVA aquatic biologist Jeff Simmons and Yale professor Tom Near to suspect they had discovered a new fish. In the case of the Tennessee Logperch, Simmons found the fish while he was studying a closely related species, the Blotchside Logperch. Back in 2013, Simmons ‘ spotted ’ a Blotchside Logperch, itself a ‘ rare ’ darter, in East Tennessee.”
“I was in the Big South Fork ‘ doing some research on mussels ’ when I saw a Blotchside,” he said. “It was a ‘ big ’ deal since the fish had not been seen there since 1890.”
Ah, the passage reveals much. The extinct Blotchside Logperch, described deviously and inaccurately as only a “rare” darter, went extinct in 1890, and winked back into existence in 2013.
Here’s a picture of the blockade log perch:
“Yale professor” is about the biggest generational Satantist shout-out you can get, and here one has been dispatched to track the reemergence of the species, and I presume to do what they can to destroy the population at its source. “Doing some research on mussels” is general, and implies he was “just in the neighborhood”, which is betrayed by his successive but purportedly unrelated darter “discoveries” in 2013 and 2017. They put “Yale professor” second in the headline so it wouldn’t smell so much.
Tom bravely hedged again by saying that seeing a species that had been extinct for over a hundred years was merely a “big” deal. As Tom’s fellow conspirator, the author bravely and brazenly called an extinct fish a merely “rare” darter.
Summing up: In 2017, Tom “discovered” a darter that had never previously been known, and just coincidentally happened to be in town four years earlier when another extinct darter winked back into existence.
I’d love to know the Mean-Spirited Western Rationalist Darwinist explanation of how and why the two darters have slightly different blotch variations. How did those blotch variations occur? Over what period of time? What drove them? But that’s a conversation for another day.
Yale’s where the folks in charge in the U.S. have a windowless fraternity clubhouse named the Tomb”. The Fraternity openly calls themselves “the Brotherhood of Death”.
This genetically-related tribe of generational Satanists, which includes Tom and the author, have worshipped Death, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. It’s not like they’re secretive about it.
I’ll sum up this example by noting that it is the third the second example of a darter winking back into existence in 2017, and that we now have three separate examples of such darters thus far in this article. It gets rough for Coincidence Theorists when you get up to three.
In February 2019, the dailysabah.com said “Not ‘ seen ’ since 1981, world’s largest bee was ‘ rediscovered ’ in Indonesia in 2019.”
The author did what they could to hedge by omitting the bee’s name from the headline. Propagandists know that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, so this tactic “compartmentalizes” the subject with an effectiveness shown by the spectacular, conditioned ignorance of the majority of the populace.
The author makes the bravely Victorian claim that the as-yet unknown bee was “rediscovered” implies that no one searched for it with enough effectiveness previously. “Not ‘ seen ’ ” underscores the same point, that no one looked for it hard enough before. These whopper Big Lies become harder and harder to tell, especially when we’re talking about the world’s largest bee.
Here’s a couple of pictures of the bee no one could find, despite looking for it unceasingly:
The article continues: “The Megachile pluto, commonly known as Wallace’s giant bee, was last seen in 1981 and believed to be extinct”.
In February 2019, dw.com said “In 2019, a Frog species believed extinct ‘ reappeared ’ in Ecuador”.
The author did what they could to hedge by omitting the frog’s name from the headline. Propagandists know that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, so this tactic “compartmentalizes” the subject with an effectiveness shown by the spectacular, conditioned ignorance of the majority of the populace.
The article continues: “Scientists have ‘ rediscovered ’ the marsupial horned frog – last seen over a decade ago and considered extinct. A colony of the amphibians was found during a recent expedition into an endangered rainforest in western Ecuador.”
The author truthfully stated “reappeared” in the headline, then “walked it back” to merely “rediscovered” in the body text. “Reappeared” is complex. On one level, it’s a Middle Ages, mouth-breather thing to say. Yet it may be the cold truth - that species are reappearing in our environment as the Ether continues to improve in health to a level where their lives can be sustained. Even to the point of “winking back into existence”, from our perspective. With the mechanics of life in this dimension and others not being precisely as we’ve been told. But that’s just speculation.
The bravely Victorian “rediscovered” implies that no one searched for it with enough effectiveness over the previous ten years.
Here’s the frog everyone missed:
In April 2019, CNN said “A Hawaiian ‘ flower ’, thought extinct, was ‘ rediscovered ’ by a drone
The author did what they could to hedge by omitting the flower’s name from the headline. Propagandists know that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, so this tactic “compartmentalizes” the subject with an effectiveness shown by the spectacular, conditioned ignorance of the majority of the populace.
It hadn’t been seen since 2009, so for ten years, just like the frog in the previous example. The bravely Victorian “rediscovered” implies that no one searched for it with enough effectiveness over the previous decade.
The article continues, and coughs up the name, which the has “buried” in the body text of the article: “Thought to be extinct, the Hibiscadelphus woodii was rediscovered on a cliff face by a drone.”
The Etheric environment is simply coming back to a level of health that will support this particular species.
In July 2019, National Geographic said “A ‘ legendary Ozark chestnut tree ’, thought extinct, was ‘rediscovered ’ in 2019”.
The author did what they could to hedge by omitting the tree’s name from the headline. Propagandists know that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, so this tactic “compartmentalizes” the subject with an effectiveness shown by the spectacular, conditioned ignorance of the majority of the populace.
The article continues: “The chinquapin was supposed to have been wiped out by blight. Now “ one ” “ determined ” Missouri naturalist is hand-pollinating trees in ‘ secret groves ’ to bring it back.”
That one determined naturalist is Steve Bost. He’s like Yale’s Tom Near, outed previously up above. They’re dispatched under the guise of discovering, investigating and saving the organism, then get down to the business of killing those organisms in as clandestine a way as can be managed. Afer which he’ll say “I tried my best to save them, but ‘climate change’ or a “mystery” virus did them in.”
‘ Secret groves ’ is a thinly-veiled, laughing reference to the human sacrifice groves of the druids, which are maintained up to the present in locations like Northern California’s “Bohemian Grove”.
In March 2019, thehindu.com said “A ‘ species of ’ wood snake that nobody had ‘seen’ in the last 140 years ‘ reappeared ’ in the Meghamalai Wildlife Sanctuary in India in 2019”.
The author did what they could to hedge by omitting the snake’s name from the headline. Propagandists know that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, so this tactic “compartmentalizes” the subject with an effectiveness shown by the spectacular, conditioned ignorance of the majority of the populace.
Not ‘ seen ’ ” states that no one had looked for it with proper assiduous previously over the previous century and a half.
The article continues: “The ‘ species ’, endemic to the Meghamalai forests and the Periyar Tiger Reserve landscape, was recently ‘ rediscovered ’ by R. Chaitanya, a herpetologist, and Varad Giri, director, Foundation for Biodiversity Conservation.”
No new “meat”, here, simply a repetition of the headline: unnamed snake, with the honest “reappeared” now walked back to merely “rediscovered”. So they’ve bored you with repetition, and walked it back, daring and hoping that you stop reading.
The author truthfully stated “reappeared” in the headline, then “walked it back” to merely “rediscovered” in the body text. “Reappeared” is complex. On one level, it’s a Middle Ages, mouth-breather thing to say. Yet it may be the cold truth - that species are reappearing in our environment as the Ether continues to improve in health to a level where their lives can be sustained. Even to the point of “winking back into existence”, from our perspective. With the mechanics of life in this dimension and others not being precisely as we’ve been told. But that’s just speculation.
The bravely Victorian “rediscovered” implies that no one searched for it with enough effectiveness since, well, the Victorian era.
The article continues, and finally coughs up the name of the snake: “The findings of the ‘ surveys ’, conducted over two years (2014-2016), were published in the Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society last month. “The snake is a ‘point endemic’ (found only in Meghamalai).”
They’ve thrown “surveys” in at the end so the subconscious would be given the out of “well, that’s just one survey!”
Here’s a picture of the snake everyone missed who was looking for it unceasingly for a century and a half in the midst of one of the most densely populated nations on Earth:
In February 2019, audubon.com said “Two Endangered Seabirds Were ‘ Rediscovered ’ on Oahu in 2019.”
Under the false guise of “journalistic efficiency”, the headline does what it can to hedge by omitting the names of the birds. Propagandists know that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, so this tactic “compartmentalizes” the subject with an effectiveness shown by the spectacular, conditioned ignorance of the majority of the populace.
The article continues: “Confirmed: Two Endangered Seabirds Have Been ‘ Rediscovered ’ on Oahu. Thought to be extinct on the Hawaiian Island for centuries, Newell’s Shearwaters and Hawaiian Petrels were found using ‘ acoustic monitoring ’.”
After finally coughing up the names of the birds, the Trusted Authority Figure tells the Big Lie with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty. That no one looked (or listened!) with enough assiduous, previously, over the last several centuries.
“Acoustic monitoring” is a brave new con, in that it will be allowed that “you couldn’t see them by looking, only by ‘listening’“. It’s a gigantic, steaming load of crap.
Here are the birds that no one could previously see, over hundreds of years, but that everyone can now clearly hear and see:
A “Global News” article from April 2020 is headlined “Jellyfish ‘ spotted ’ in Venice canal as coronavirus clear-up continues”.
The words “ mystery ”, “ baffled ” and “ puzzled ” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “startling”.
That’s why the article goes on to say “A biologist in Italy recorded startling footage earlier this month of a near-transparent jellyfish swimming in the crystal-clear waters of the Venice canals as the city’s waterways continued to clear up amid the ongoing coronavirus lockdown.”
The “virus did it” meme continues: “Venice officials say the city’s canals have cleared up over the last month because boat traffic is no longer ‘ stirring up sediment ’ in the water. In other words, nature hasn’t ‘ exactly ’ “healed” from the pollution caused by humans, but it’s enjoying a ‘ little ’ break right ‘ now ’.
The “pollution” that the Covid is alleged to have alleviated is general. Not “exactly” healed is the Big Lie, told by a Trusted Authority Figure with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty. An environment that is booming and burgeoning to an historically unprecedented level is flatly maintained to be “not ‘ exactly ’ healed”. The author hedges again that it’s only a “little” break, and that the little break is only taking place right now, and will stop in the future.
Jeff Miller, Brooklyn, New York, August 7, 2020
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, please send me a note at [email protected]
