“It is high time for the living to get tough, for toughness is indispensable in the struggle to safeguard and develop the life-force; this will not detract from their goodness, as long as they stand courageously by the truth. There is ground for hope in the fact that among millions of decent, hard-working people there are only a few plague-ridden individuals, who do untold harm by appealing to the dark, dangerous drives of the armored average man and mobilizing him for political murder. There is but one antidote to the average man’s predisposition to plague: his own feelings for true life. The life force does not seek power but demands only to play its full and acknowledged part in human affairs. It manifests itself through love, work and knowledge.”
From “Listen Little Man”, by Wilhelm Reich, 1945
The breakthroughs keep coming, every day, every article.
I think one of the most impactful things that I’m demonstrating is the how coopted the scientific establishment actually is.
The good news is that they’ve done all the work, already, and it only takes a critical eye to really flesh out the picture.
I’m really not doing anything but scrupulously editing their work, and expanding upon points which they’ve already made, but covered up behind hedging generalities.
GRAINS AND DAIRY MAKE YOU CRAZY, THE DATA
The 2.71 adjusted odds ratio of schizophrenia among the highest tertile of the “cereal” group of Japanese subjects was 266% greater than the the 0.74 odds ratio of schizophrenia among the middle tertile of the “vegetable” group.
The “cereals” group consumed in descending order, rice, confectioneries, bread, miso soup, ice cream, and rice crackers, while the “vegetables” group did not consume those items.
Eating vegetables makes you significantly saner, while eating dairy, grains and sugar makes you exponentially crazier.
The rate of schizophrenia among Japanese subjects in the highest tertile of the “cereal" group was 171% greater.
Here we can see the clear, incontrovertible impact of gluttony, saturated fats, grains and sugar on the pathogenesis of schizophrenia.
Dairy dessert consumption among middle-aged South Australians was 111.4% greater, or double among women than men (8.94 vs. 4.23)
Schizophrenia in the highest tertile of the “cereal” group of Japanese subjects was 74% greater than it was in the lowest tertile of the “cereal” group (104 of 213, or 48.8%, vs. 60 of 214, or 28%).
60% of the 213 Japanese schizophrenics in the highest tertile of the “cereal” group were female (148 vs. 65).
104 of 213 Japanese schizophrenics, or 48.8% were in the highest tertile of the “cereal group”.
Saturated fat consumption was 17% greater among Japanese schizophrenics than it was among healthy controls. First author Koji Tsuruga omitted the percentage, and said “there was a higher ratio of fatty acids in the gross calories of the diet in patients with schizophrenia”.
The middle tertile in the “cereal” group of Japanese subjects had rate of schizophrenia that was 15% greater.
The highest tertile in the “vegetable” group of Japanese subjects had a rate of schizophrenia that was 10% greater. Here we can see that gluttony drives schizophrenia, even if you avoid the deadly foods.
This is of great interest, as it shows that the 15% increase in schizophrenia among the middle tertile of the “cereal” group is not exponentially different than the 10% increase in schizophrenia among the highest tertile of the vegetable group. Gluttony is a huge part of the equation.
Total dairy consumption among middle aged South Australians was 8.2% greater among women than men (357 grams vs. 330 grams).
Cognitive failures among middle-aged South Australians were 8.2% greater among women than men (35.6% vs. 32.9%)
In 2010, the 8.2%-greater dairy consumption among middle-aged South Australian women vs. men and the 8.2%-greater cognitive failures documented among those women vs. men were identical.
State anxiety among middle-aged South Australians was 7.2% greater among women than men (38.7 vs. 36.1)
Monounsaturated fatty acid consumption among Japanese schizophrenics was 6% greater.
Monounsaturated fat is purported to be a “healthy” fat. It is found in olive, peanut, and canola oils, avocados, nuts such as almonds, hazelnuts, and pecans, and seeds such as pumpkin and sesame seeds. I’m sorry to be the one to break it to you, but “healthy” fats don’t make you 6% more insane.
The 7.73 g/1000 kcal consumption of Polyunsaturated fatty acid consumption of the highest tertile of the “vegetable” group of Japanese subjects, which group did not have an increase in schizophrenia, was 6% greater than the 7.3 g/1000 kcals of highest tertile of the “cereal” group, who did have an increase in schizophrenia. This clearly demonstrates that polyunsaturated fat is the lone “healthy” fat, in that consuming even large amounts of it makes you 6% less insane.
Depression among middle-aged South Australians was 5% greater among women than men (33.4 vs. 31.8)
Among Japanese schizophrenics, total fat consumption was 5% greater.
Perceived stress was 4.2% greater among middle-aged South Australian women than men (22.6 vs. 21.7)
Trait anxiety was 4.2% greater among middle-aged South Australian women than men (37.2 vs. 35.7)
Japanese people with higher scores for the “cereal” dietary pattern were more likely to have schizophrenia and be female.
The lowest tertile in the “vegetable” group and the “cereal” group of Japanese subjects both showed no increase in schizophrenia. Here, again, we see confirmed the crucial role that gluttony plays in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. You can eat anything you want in moderation, and it won’t drive you insane. But if you engage in gluttony, and focus on the deadliest foods, it will, make no mistake, drive you insane.
Schizophrenia in the highest tertile of the “vegetable group” of Japanese subjects was 26% less than in the lowest tertile of the vegetable group (71 of 213 vs. 91 of 214).
This is even more cheering, in that eating the largest quantities of healthy food, even in gluttonous amounts, makes you less crazy.
DECREASING WHEAT AND DAIRY CONSUMPTION, THE DATA
From 1970 to 2019, U.S. per capital consumption of cow’s milk decreased by 49%, from .96 cups per person per day to .49 cups per person per day.
From 2000 to 2023, per capita wheat flour consumption in the U.S. decreased by 10.8%, from 146.3 pounds to 130.5 pounds.
From 2000 to 2023, the average annual decrease in per capita flour consumption in the United States was .54%.
From 2009 to 2018, sales of hot and cold cereals decreased by $2.16 billion, or 17%, from $12.7 billion to $10.54 billion.
From 2010 to 2019, U.S. per capita consumption of cow’s milk decreased by 21%, from .62 cups per person per day to .49 cups per person per day.
From 2010 to 2019, the 2.3% average annual decrease in per capita milk consumption in the U.S. was 92% greater, or almost double its 1.2% long term average annual decrease from 1970 to 2019.
The great positive change is increasing exponentially, going forward in time.
The populace has recognized that drinking cow’s milk causes psychosis and schizophrenia when gluten from wheat causes cellular junctions in the G.I. tract to leak, allowing small, neuroactive peptide fragments from milk to enter to the bloodstream and cross the blood-brain barrier.
In 2019, Americans on average consumed 80% less milk per day than recommended by the USDA (.49 cups vs. 2.5 cups).
From 2021 to 2023, per capita wheat flour consumption in the U.S. decreased by 2.6%, from 134 pounds to 130.5 pounds.
From 2021 to 2023, the 1.3% average annual per capita decrease in wheat flour consumption in the United States was 140% greater, or well more than double its .54% long term average annual increase from 2000 to 2023.
The great positive change is increasing exponentially, going forward in time.
The populace has recognized that the 2.71 adjusted odds ratio of schizophrenia among the highest tertile of the “cereal” group of Japanese subjects was 266% greater than the the 0.74 odds ratio of schizophrenia among the middle tertile of the “vegetable” group.
From 2022 to 2023, international wheat consumption decreased by 1%. Farmprogress.com said it was because of “buyers responding to higher prices”.
THE ARTICLES
In 2010, the Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition published “Dairy intake and cognitive health in middle-aged South Australians”.
Where, despite being a scientist by trade, author Georgina E Crichton wrote the headline in a completely general way, so that the reader cannot discern that dairy intake negatively impacts the cognitive health of middle-aged South Australians.
As a propagandist, Georgina knows that seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and her hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the scope of the exponential increase in dairy-driven mental illness that she is attempting to obfuscate.
Georgina goes on to say ”Intakes of whole fat dairy products, including ice-cream and cream, were associated with increased depression, anxiety, stress, cognitive failures, poorer memory functioning and general health."
Georgina used the time-honored propaganda technique of using the hedging generality “increased”, and then, said “Pre-existing data from 1183 middle-aged men and women in South Australia”. Then, in journalistic parlance, she “buried” the numbers in a table below, and omitted any actual percentage increases. It goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the scope of the exponential increase in dairy-driven mental illness that she is attempting to obfuscate.
So, I had to do the math, a whole bunch of times, to learn:
Diary dessert consumption was 111.4% greater, or double among women than men (8.94 vs. 4.23)
Total dairy consumption was 8.2% greater among women than men (357 grams vs. 330 grams).
Cognitive failures were 8.2% greater among women than men (35.6% vs. 32.9%)
Frequency of memory problems were 1.4% greater among men than women (94.8 vs. 93.5).
Depression was 5% greater among women than men (33.4 vs. 31.8)
Perceived stress was 4.2% greater among women than men (22.6 vs. 21.7)
State anxiety was 7.2% greater among women than men (38.7 vs. 36.1)
Trait anxiety was 4.2% greater among women than men (37.2 vs. 35.7)
Here’s Georgina E. Crichton’s picture, win a Satanic purple and green top, with a Satanic green background:
[image]
(Georgina E. Crichton)
Georgina figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.
I have included her photograph so that you could get a better idea of what generational Satanist Freemasons in a position of marginal influence looks like.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
On August 1, 2014, fooddive.com said "Kellogg reports drop in profit, trims forecast
Where author Paul Conley said “reports drop in profit” to give the subconscious of the Coincidence theorist reader the green light to say “oh, but someone must have reported that incorrectly!” or “oh, but that was just one report!”. As a propagandist, Paul knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal accountability.
He said “drop in profit” and “trims forecast” because, as a propagandist, Paul knows that seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and his hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the scope of the exponential increase in cereal sales that he is attempting to obfuscate.
In April 2015, Neuropsych Disease and Treatment published “Dietary patterns and schizophrenia: a comparison with healthy controls”.
Where, despite being a scientist by trade, first author Koji Tsuruga wrote the headline in a completely general way, so that the reader cannot discern that dairy and wheat intake drive schizophrenia. As a propagandist, Koji knows that seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and his hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the exponential scope by which grain and dairy increase schizophrenia which he is attempting to obfuscate.
The scientific study goes on to say:
“The subjects comprised 237 outpatients aged 30–60 years (123 males and 114 females) diagnosed with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria of either schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder at four psychiatric hospitals in Japan. We derived two dietary patterns by principal component analysis; namely, the “vegetable” dietary pattern and the “cereal” dietary pattern. In the “cereal” dietary pattern, the high tertile was associated with a significantly increased risk of schizophrenia (P<0.001).”
Here are the food in the cereal dietary pattern:
Western-type confectioneries – 0.477
Japanese-type confectioneries – 0.432
Rice crackers/rice – 0.354
Ice cream – 0.388
Bread – 0.426
Rice - 0.648
Miso Soup - .513
Koji goes on to say:
“The “vegetable” dietary pattern was not associated with an increased risk of schizophrenia. For the “cereal” dietary pattern, the high tertile was associated with a significantly increased risk of schizophrenia.”
Here’s a bell-ringer:
“The subjects with higher scores for the “vegetable” dietary pattern were less likely to have schizophrenia and to be male.”
in addition to being a scientist by trade, Kori is also a propagandist. That’s why he Satanically inverted it, to avoid plainly stating: “Subjects with higher scores for the “cereal” dietary pattern were more likely to have schizophrenia and be female”.
Koji goes on to say:
“The “vegetable” dietary pattern was positively associated with the intake of proteins, carbohydrates, fats, saturated fatty acids, monounsaturated fatty acids, polyunsaturated fatty acids, n-3 fatty acids, and n-6 fatty acids.”
Here’s the data on schizophrenia in the “cereal” group:
Cereal dietary pattern
Low tertile 60 Reference Reference
Middle tertile (95% CI) 73 1.19 (0.77–1.83) 0.435 1.15 (0.73–1.81) 0.559
High tertile (95% CI) 104 2.43 (1.67–3.56) <0.001 2.71 (1.80–4.09) <0.001
The study goes on to say:
“Our study shows that there was a higher ratio of fatty acids in the gross calories of the diet in patients with schizophrenia. This result supports the hypothesis that fatty acids may play a role in schizophrenia pathogenesis. Alternatively, as a result of having compensated for a lack of fatty acids in the nervous system, the human body may consume more fatty acids, leading to this result."
Here, with a straight face, the career scientist being quoted in a major scientific journal is saying that being insane makes you crave saturated fat. Versus the truth, that excessive consumption of saturated fat makes you insane.
Koji goes on to say:
“This study also shows that patients with schizophrenia tend to consume meals that contain substantially more oil and fat.”
He’s once again Satanically inverted it. He’s steadfastly averring that these people didn’t start bingeing on junk food until they went crazy. It’s a gymnastic mechanism of denial to avoid saying “consuming substantially more oil and fat causes schizophrenia.”
Koji has also generally demonized all oil and fat. You’ll see how duplicitous that is in a minute.
He goes on:
“In addition, it shows that the ratio of fatty acids in the gross calories of the diet is higher in patients with schizophrenia. This result suggests that schizophrenic patients may be more likely to consume food that contains oil and fat.”
He’s once again Satanically inverted it, to avoid saying "Consuming food that contains oil and fat causes schizophrenia. He’s implying, psychotically, that they didn’t eat any of those things until they went insane. That going insane made them eat those things.
Remember, this man is a scientist by trade, and his work is being published in a major scientific journal.
The study breaks out food consumption among the groups. Here, I’ve documented food consumption in the highest tertile of the “vegetable” group, and compared it to the highest tertile of the “cereal” group:
Fat (g/1,000 kcal) - 29.8 to 31.3 - Total fat consumption was 5% greater among schizophrenics.
Saturated fatty acid (g/1,000 kcal) - 7.63 to 8.99. Saturated fat consumption was 17% greater among schizophrenics.
Monousaturated fatty acid (g/1,000 kcal) - 10.44 to 11.10. Monosaturated fatty acid consumption was 6% greater among schizophrenics.
Monounsaturated fat is purported to be a “healthy” fat. It is found in olive, peanut, and canola oils, avocados, nuts such as almonds, hazelnuts, and pecans, and seeds such as pumpkin and sesame seeds. I’m sorry to be the one to break it to you, but “healthy” fats don’t make you 6% more insane.
First author Koji Tsuruga said “there was a higher ratio of fatty acids in the gross calories of the diet in patients with schizophrenia”.
I had to do the math to learn that the 7.73 g/1000 kcal consumption of Polyunsaturated fatty acid consumption of the highest tertile of the “vegetable” group was 6% greater than the 7.3 g/1000 kcals of highest tertile of the “cereal” group, and the “vegetable” group did not have an increase in schizophrenia.
Polyunsaturated fat is the lone “healthy” fat, in that consuming even large amounts of it makes you 6% less insane.
Here we can clearly see the fact that the “vegetable” group, who ate 6% more healthy fats, had no schizophrenia increase. These fats are protective, pallative. While those who consumed 6% more monounsaturated fatty acids got schizophrenia.
The good news for us all is that neither the lowest tertile of the “vegetable” group or the “cereal” group had an increase in schizophrenia. Here we can clearly see the crucial nature of gluttony to the pathogensis of schizophrenia.
You can eat anything you want in moderation, and it won’t drive you insane. But if you engage in gluttony, and focus on the deadliest foods, it will, make no mistake, drive you insane.
Ergo, the highest tertile in the “vegetable” group had a 10% increase in schizophrenia. Here we can see that gluttony drives schizophrenia, even if you avoid the deadly foods.
The middle tertile in the “cereal” group had a 15% increase in schizophrenia.
The highest tertile in the cereal" group had a 171% increase, or near-tripling in schizophrenia.
Well, there it is.
Here we can see the clear, incontrovertible Impact of gluttony and saturated fats on the pathogenesis of schizophrenia.
Schizophrenia in the highest tertile of the “vegetable group” was 22% less than in the lowest tertile of the vegetable group (71 of 213 vs. 91 of 214). Eating more healthy food makes you less sick.
Schizophrenia in the highest tertile of the “cereal” group was 75% greater than in the lowest tertile of the “cereal” group (104 of 213 vs. 60 of 214).
Spectacularly, First author Koji Tsurunga provides schizophrenia data for men, but omits it for women.
On February 13, 2018, myrecipes.com said “Cereal Sales Are in Serious Decline”.
Where Author Matthew Kassel said “in serious decline” because, as a propagandist, he knows that seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and his hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the exponential decrease in cereal sales which he is attempting to obfuscate.
He said “decline” not only because it’s general, but also because it’s softer than “dropped” or “decreased” and because declines are shallow and gradual.
Matthew and the rest of his rotten ilk proudly refer to these sorts of machinations as “tradecraft”.
He goes on to say:
“Breakfast cereal’s hegemonic grip on the American diet is loosening. A new report by the research firm IBISWorld, highlighted today in the The Los Angeles Times, estimates that by year’s end, sales of hot and cold cereals will have declined by about 17 percent from $12.7 billion in 2009”.
From 2009 to 2018, sales of hot and cold cereals decreased by $2.16 billion, or 17%, from $12.7 billion to $10.54 billion.
Matthew said “a new report” to give the subconscious of the Coincidence theorist reader the green light to say “oh, but someone must have reported that incorrectly!” or “oh, but that was just one report!”. As a propagandist, he knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal accountability."
The article goes on to say “Analysts told the L.A. Times that Americans just don’t think breakfast cereals are all that healthy anymore, overloaded as they are with sugar, despite the efforts of Post, Kellogg, and other corporations to rebrand, rejigger and put out seemingly healthier options.”
On June 21, 2022, ers.usda.gov said “Fluid Milk Consumption Continues Downward Trend, Proving Difficult to Reverse”.
Where author Hayden Stewart said “continues downward trend” because, as a propagandist, he knows that seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and his hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the exponential decrease in milk consumption which he is attempting to obfuscate.
The article goes on to say:
“The USDA, Economic Research Service (ERS) Food Availability (Per Capita) Data System shows that U.S. daily per capita consumption of fluid milk decreased over each of the past seven decades. Between 1990 and 2000, it fell from 0.78 cup to 0.69 cup (an 11.5-percent decline). By 2010, it was down to 0.62 cup (10.1 percent lower than it had been in 2000). Compared with each of the previous six decades, U.S. daily per person fluid milk consumption fell at its fastest rate in the 2010s. In 2019, it was 0.49 cup (20.7 percent lower than in 2010).”
Hayden said “fell” a couple of times because it’s softer than “dropped” or “decreased”, but mostly as a thinly-veiled reference to his fallen Lord Lucifer.
[image]
(The fall of Lucifer, from “Paradise Lost”, by John Milton, 1667)
Then in journalistic parlance, Hayden went on to “bury” a bunch of data in a table below. If just 30% of readers make it to the body text, what percent do you think read the data in the table, and then do the math on it?
I was forced to do the math to learn that, from 1970 to 2019, U.S. per capital consumption of cow’s milk decreased by 49%, from .96 cups per person per day to .49 cups per person per day.
From 1970 to 2019, the average annual decrease in per capita milk consumption in the U.S. was 1.2%.
From 2010 to 2019, U.S. per capita consumption of cow’s milk decreased by 21%, from .62 cups per person per day to .49 cups per person per day.
From 2010 to 2019, the average annual decrease in per capita milk consumption in the U.S was 2.3%.
From 2010 to 2019, the 2.3% average annual decrease in per capita milk consumption in the U.S. was 92% greater, or almost double its 1.2% long term average annual decrease from 1970 to 2019.
The great positive change is increasing exponentially, going forward in time.
The populace has recognized that drinking cow’s milk causes psychosis and schizophrenia when gluten from wheat causes cellular junctions in the G.I. tract to leak, allowing small, neuroactive peptide fragments from milk to enter to the bloodstream and cross the blood-brain barrier.
Hayden’s article bravely goes on to say: “The Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020–2025, recommend individuals consume 2- to 3 cup-equivalents of dairy products per day depending on their age, gender, and level of physical activity.”
In 2019, Americans on average consumed 80% less milk per day than recommended by the USDA (.49 cups vs. 2.5 cups).
Don’t let the door hit you on your fat, milk-drinking ass on the way out, USDA.
On November 28, 2022, cnbc.com said "From cereal to food giant — Kellogg stages a makeover"
Where author Dymond Green said “stages a makeover” because, as a propagandist, she knows that seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and his hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the exponential decrease in cereal sales which he is attempting to obfuscate.
“Stages a makeover” makes it seem fashionable. It’s Mil-speak for “abandoning a hopeless position to avoid going out of business”.
The article goes on to say “Kellogg, the 117-year-old brand that started as a breakfast cereal company has since expanded to be one of the largest food companies in the world, has seen declining cereal sales over the past couple of decades."
Dymond has memory-holed the fact that Kellog still is a cereal company, and is desperately trying to quickly diversify, under the cover of a helpful propagandist like Dymond.
She said “declining” not only because it’s general, but also because it’s softer than “dropped” or “decreased” and because declines are shallow and gradual.
On January 6, 2023, ibisworld.com “buried” a bunch of data in a table. I had to do the math to learn that, from 2000 to 2023, per capita wheat flour consumption in the U.S. decreased by 10.8%, from 146.3 pounds to 130.5 pounds.
From 2000 to 2023, the average annual decrease in per capita flour consumption in the United States was .54%.
From 2021 to 2023, per capita wheat flour consumption in the U.S. decreased by 2.6%, from 134 pounds to 130.5 pounds.
From 2021 to 2023, the 1.3% average annual per capita decrease in wheat flour consumption in the United States was 140% greater, or well more than double its .54% long term average annual increase from 2000 to 2023.
The great positive change is increasing exponentially, going forward in time.
The populace has recognized that the 2.71 adjusted odds ratio of schizophrenia among the highest tertile of the “cereal” group of Japanese subjects was 266% greater than the the 0.74 odds ratio of schizophrenia among the middle tertile of the “vegetable” group.
On January 9, 2023, farmprogress.com said “global domestic wheat consumption rates are 1% lower than last year as buyers respond to higher prices.”
From 2022 to 2023, international wheat consumption decreased by 1%. Farmprogress.com said it was because of “buyers responding to higher prices”.
Jeff Miller, Libertyville, IL, February 17, 2022
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
