SHELLFISH
Great positive changes are underway at every level of our reality. They began in earnest in 2012, and have been increasing in speed and magnitude. I began documenting the subject in this series of articles, entitled “Positive Changes That Are Occurring”, in July of 2013.
These historically-unprecedented positive changes are being driven by many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices based on the work of Wilhelm Reich and Karl Hans Welz.
Since Don Croft first fabricated tactical Orgonite in 2000, its widespread, ongoing and ever-increasing distribution has been unknitting and transforming the ancient Death energy matrix built and expanded by our dark masters, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. And, as a result, the Ether is returning to its natural state of health and vitality.
One of those changes is that shellfish are growing to unprecedented numbers and size regardless of geography. That’s because the size, fertility and longevity of any organism vary directly with the health of its etheric environment.
For example, in August 2012, Science Daily said “New survey of ocean floor finds juvenile scallops are abundant in Mid-Atlantic”.
Where “abundant” is a hedging generality, put forward to blunt any specific insight into the great, historically-unprecedented positive change I’m documenting here.
The article continues:
“Researchers are getting a comprehensive view of the ocean floor using a new instrument, and have confirmed that there are high numbers of young sea scallops off of Delaware Bay.”
Where the inference is clearly that it’s just more-highly-effective LOOKING that has led to the highest scallop count in all history.
The author has walked “abundant” in the headline back to merely “high” in the body text.
As a bonus, the author put “New SURVEY” on the front end of the headline to give the subconscious of the reader the green light to say “oh, that was just one survey!” The propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
Beyond the smoke screen of “increased scallop counting ability”, the author provides no insight as to what might be driving the highest number of scallops ever seen, in all history.
Cleary, there’s been some great positive change in the marine environment in the Delaware bay.
In response to this great resurgence of life, what we euphemistically call “secret agents” are engaged in ongoing environmental terrorism operations, in an attempt to prop up the failing and wholly-fraudulent “Poor Mother Gaia is Dying” confidence game on behalf of the barely-closeted Death worshippers they work for.
For example, a bioweapon named “MSX” was released into Mississippi’s oyster population in 1987. Mississippi’s Oxford journal called it a “mystery disease”. They said it that way because the words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “remarkable”. That’s why Yale University published an article in 2015 headlined “A Remarkable Recovery for The Oysters of Chesapeake Bay”.
In it we learn that Maryland and Virginia reported their best oyster harvests in three decades in 2014, gathering a combined 900,000 bushel.
Clearly, there’s been some great positive change in the marine environment in Maryland and Virginia.
In July 2015, phys.org said “HabCamV4 sees large numbers of young scallops off Delaware Bay”.
Where the hedging generality “LARGE numbers” was put forward to defray against “historically-unprecedented scallop numbers”.
Here they are, booming and burgeoning to a level never seen previously:
(HabCamV4 photos of historically-unprecedented scallop population off Delaware Bay, 2015)
In July 2015, wgcu.com said “Pine Island Scallop Count Gives Mixed Results”.
Where “mixed results” is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of statistics that would provide specific insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here. Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
Under the false guise of familiarity, the headline omits the word “Florida”, to make the subject virtually unsearchable.
The article continues: “After about 20 minutes, the group swam back empty-handed. “No scallops?” Kilmartin asked the group. “One dead-- dead scallop half-shell," said Nikhil Mehta, a local biologist. He and the others only found one white scallop half-shell. Mehta said it was bleached, indicating it had been dead for a while. The volunteers only found 32 scallops, compared with 44 last year. But Hazell said snorkelers found scallops in more areas this year than ever before.”
The numbers that Kilmartin and Mehta are stating are completely made up - as is the claptrap about “empty handed” and “dead for awhile”. The scallops are booming and burgeoning to a level not seen in these pathologically-lying Illuminists’ lifetimes, which is why they hedge and said only generally that scallops had been found in “more” years than ever before, in all history.
Here are Nikhil Mehta and Nancy Kilmartin, on the left:
(Pine Island, Florida scallop counting volunteers Nikhil Mehta and Nancy Kilmarten, to left)
I’ve included their pictures so you could get a better idea of what generational Satanists in a position of marginal influence look like. Not every scallop researcher is a literally-blood-drinking Illuminist, of course, but those who get quoted in mainstream news publications certainly are.
In August 2015, a flandersnews.be article from Belgium said “Record oyster shell on Knokke beach”.
Where “Record oyster shell” is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of statistics that would provide specific insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here. Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
Under the false guise of familiarity, the headline omits “Belgium” and “Flanders”, and uses only the local “Knokke beach”, to further compartmentalize the information. “Record OYSTER shell” is a hedge back from “Japanese oyster”. The more general, the less searchable. Layer after layer of compartmentalization.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. Two of those variants are “surprised” and “exceptional”.
That’s why the article goes on to say “Our North Sea coast is full of surprises. So, imagine the excitement this week when holidaymakers from the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg made an exceptional find: an oyster shell measuring 38 centimetres. Girls Alice and Clémentine Lechat were playing on the beach at the jet-set resort of Knokke when they came across the record-breaking shell near the Zwin nature reserve. The shell measures 2.5 cm more than the largest oyster shell encountered so far.”
Where “the largest oyster shell encountered so far” is Mil-speak for “world record oyster shell”.
(Alice and Clémentine Lechat, center, with the largest and thus the oldest oyster ever found, in all history, Belgium, 2015)
(The largest and thus the oldest oyster ever found, in all history, Belgium, 2015)
The author hedged again by allowing that the record shell was “2.5 cm more” than the previous record holder, but carefully withheld the far more impactful percentage increase between them. So, I had to do the math.
The new record shell is 7% longer than the old. Such records are usually broken by tiny margins, as organisms grow to a genetically-programmed maximum length, and grow in smaller and smaller increments down through time. Or so goes the rapidly collapsing Orthodoxy of mean-spirited Western materialism, which holds that “there is no such thing as the ether”.
The size, fertility and longevity of any organism vary directly directly with the health of its etheric environment.
There’s clearly been some great positive change in the marine environment in Belgium.
The author from Flanders News doersn’t mention the fact that the size record of this oyster is also by definition a longevity record, as the shell grows in successive leaves, like the rings of a tree.
Canada’s Clearwater harvested a “record number” of clams in 2016.
There’s clearly been some great positive change in the marine environment in Canada.
Juvenile clams were said to be “booming” in Washington state in 2017.
There’s clearly been some great positive change in the marine environment in Washington State.
In 2017, the University of South Florida said “Scallop abundance declined in three of the four open-harvest areas”.
The author used the word “declined” because it’s general. It’s an unsubstantiated claim.
Under the false guise of familiarity, the headline omits any mention of geography, to make the subject virtually unsearchable.
The article continues:
“In St. Joseph Bay scallop density Increased (2 scallops per survey station in 2016 to 7 in 2017). The percentage of stations with scallops present increased. This area will be open for a limited season.”
The author provided the numbers, but carefully withheld the far more impactful percentage increase between them. So I had to do the math to learn that the scallop density in South Florida’s St. Joseph bay increased 250% from 2016 to 2017. In response to this unprecedented increase in life and vitality, the folks in charge shortened the season. That’s so, next year, they could crow that their “conservation efforts” have “saved the scallops”.
They figured, correctly, that the rubes would never notice. Can you see how the percentage increase of stations with scallops present is obfuscated with the general “increased”?
The article continues: “In Franklin/Wakulla area, density decreased (28 in 2016 to 20 in 2017) but the percentage of stations with scallops present increased.”
Can you see how the percentage increase of stations with scallops present is obfuscated with the general “increased”?
The article continues: “In Taylor/Dixie scallop density decreased (189 in 2016 to 62 in 2017) but all survey stations had scallops present. This area opened to harvest early and will also close early in 2017.”
Can you see how the mentioned that all stations had scallops, but won’t provide a context? That’s to blunt any specific insight into the great, historically-unprecedented positive change in the marine environment in Florida.
The article continues: “In Citrus/Hernando County (open to harvest) density decreased (55 in 2016 to 34 in 2017) but the percentage of stations with scallops presentincreased.”
Can you see how the percentage increase of stations with scallops present is obfuscated with the general “increased”?
In February 2017, the duplicitously-named southeastgreen.com said “WC approves shortened 2017 scallop season for St. Joe Bay”.
Where, under the false guise of familiarity, the headline omits the word “Florida”, along with the name of the county, to make the subject virtually unsearchable. In the face of historically-unprecedented scallop numbers, the county has cut the scallop season to “save the scallops”, and will crow the next year that their conservation measures” have saved the scallops. They figure, quite correctly, that the rubes would never notice.
There’s clearly been some great positive change in the marine environment in South Florida.
In March 2017, Maine’s Bangor Daily News said “Regulators close federal scallop fishing grounds in Gulf of Maine”.
In the face of historically-unprecedented scallop numbers, the Feds have cut the scallop season in Maine to “save the scallops”, and will crow the next year that their conservation measures” have “saved the scallops”. They figure, quite correctly, that the rubes would never notice.
In June 2017, spendmatters.com said “Scallop Prices Have Dived due to Large Catches”. That’s because prices decrease either when supply increases, or demand decreases, or both.
Where “DIVED”, while lurid, is general. “Large” catches is also general. They’re doing what they can to blunt and defray any specific insight into the great positive change that I’m documenting here.
The article continues: “total scallop catches within this season are forecast to rise 15% year-over-year, to around 48 million pounds.”
Where the author used “rise” because it’s softer than “increase”, and as a thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black Sun cult that has run things in all the nations, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
The author doesn’t offer any suggestion as to what is driving the historically-unprecedented, see-the-needle moving increases in the scallop population, regardless of geography. That’s an example of a propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
In August 2017, an article I’m no longer able to locate from Martha’s Vineyard said “First scallop spawn of the season***!”***
Where, under the false guise of familiarity, the headline omits any mention of geography, to make the subject virtually unsearchable. The headline crows that it’s the “first!” scallop spawn of the season, but that’s just to compartmentalize the real meaning, which, in journlistic parlance, the author has “buried” below:
“The first scallop spawn of the season was another spectacular success. Something is happening this season. Is it the rainy spring and cool temperatures?”
Sorry, you’re still not allowed to know why the first scallop spawn of the season in Martha’s Vineyard was another spectular success. Beyond that, generally, somethingwas said to be happening to the scallops. You’ll need to use your personal discernment to determine how cool spring temperatures could be possible in 2017, which NOAA to this moment purports was the third hottest year in all history. To preserve current programming levels, stop reading immediately, breathe through your mouth, narrow your eyes bitterly and affirm “but that’s there.”
To help any lingering Coincidence Theorists in the readership along, in February 2018 AP News said, with a completely straight face: “Gulf of Maine had cool year in 2017, but is still warming”.
“Doublethink is the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them…To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies — all this is indispensably necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this knowledge; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth."
From “1984”, by George Orwell, 1949
They used the word “cool” in the Gulf of Maine story, and also in the one from Martha’s Vineyard because the international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of the word “cold”.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “couldn’t say”.
That’s why the article continues: “We couldnt say but the the egg numbers during spawns have been through the roof! Once again a record spawn with 99 million eggs collected”.
Where “through the roof” (with bonus exclamation point!), while lurid, is general. “Record spawn" is also general. The hedging generalities are used to blunt and defray any specific insight into the historically-unprecedented positive change I’m documenting here.
There’s clearly been some great positive change in the environment of the scallop on Martha’s Vineyard. Yet the Feds have closed the scallop bed in the Gulf of Maine, just across the way. What gives?
The folks in charge are not your friends, and are lying to you about basically everything, including the scallops.
In November 2017, ack.net said “Scallop season opens on a high note”.
Where, under the false guise of familiarity, the headline omits any mention of geography, to "compartmentalize” the phenomenon and make the article virtually unsearchable.
“On a high note” implies it was all downhill, from there. “High note” is a hedging generality used to blunt any specific awareness of the great positive change that has taken place.
The article continues: “By the afternoon of opening day of commercial scalloping season yesterday, a few things were certain . The fleet was small, with 25 boats in town and between 12 and 15 in Madaket. Most fishermen were back at the dock by 10 a.m. The scallops were decent -sized. And the opening price to fishermen was $13 a pound.”
Where “a few things were certain” creates the picture that there was a great deal of uncertainty. Versus the truth, that it was a spectacular start to the scallop season.
The words “few” and “small” and “decent sized” all mitigate. The sacred Illuminist number of $13 per pound is meaningless. Is that high? Low?
The article continues: “Asked if a good opening day means a good season, onefisherman shrugged and said, “You won’t see any plumbers giving up their day job.”
Where the great opening day has been walked back merely to “good”. The fact that the “one” fisherman’s name isn’t used means that the author made up the negative quote, which they designed to hedge against the historically-unprecedented start to the scallop season in Massachusetts.
The article continues:
“Sarcasm aside, fishermen also said the harbor seems healthier than it did last year. ’It’s nice to see lots of scallops,’ said Rick Kotalac, who scallops in the town harbor. “It’s good to see some green eel grass and some healthier looking scallops.”
Where “lots of” scallops is general. “It’s great to see green eel grass”, has been hedged back merely “good” to see “some” green eel grass. .but merely GOOD. “It’s great to see healthy scallops” has been hedged back merely to “good” to see “some” health-IER looking" scallops. They’re not healthy, they’re merely healthier. They’re not healthier, they’re merely healthier looking.
Since Rick was actually named, we not only know that he’s a real person, but also that he’s a generational Satanist, as he’s getting quoted in a mainstream news article. Hence his hedge-fest against the spectacular, historically-unprecedented positive change in the marine environment in Massachusetts.
Here’s Rick’s picture:
(Rick Kotalac, scallop fisherman, Massachusetts)
I’ve included Rick’s photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
Not all scallop fishermen are generational Satanists, of course, but those who get quoted in mainstream news articles certainly are.
We get the word “Satan” from their great god Set, whom they’ve worshipped under various names and guises all the way back to Babylon, and before.
Set, also known as Seth and Suetekh, was the Egyptian god of war, chaos and storms, brother of Osiris, Isis, and Horus the Elder, uncle to Horus the Younger, and brother-husband to Nephthys.
(The repugnant god Set)
(The repugnant Jar Jar Binks)
(The repugnant god Set)
Immediately above, I’ve provided pictures of the repugnant god Set, the repugnant Jar Jar Binks, and the repugnant god Set. Generational Satanist George Lucas figured the rubes would never notice.
In December 2017, Maine’s Ellsworth American said “Prices look low as scallop season opens”.
Where, under the false guise of familiarity, the headline omits the word “Maine”, to make the subject virtually unsearchable. The author implies that scallop prices are not low, pushed there by historically-unprecedented supply, but rather that they only LOOK low.
Prices decrease when supply increases, or demand decreases, or both.
Remember, just ten months previously, the Feds shut down scallop fishing in the gulf of Maine - and ten months later, the scallop supply is still so high that prices are depressed to a level that the Ellsworth American completely obfuscates…that is, beyond “scallop prices look low”.
There’s clearly been some major positive change in the marine environment in Maine. The Ellsworth American is a State propaganda organ, using conscious deception while maintiaining the firmenss of purpose that goes with complete honesty.
In January 2018, Virginia’s Rappahanock Record said “Winter oyster harvest is booming”.
Where “booming” is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of statistics that would provide specific insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here. Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
Under the false guise of familiarity, the propagandist author has omitted any mention of geography, to make the subject virtually unsearchable. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The article continues: “They are harvesting their limits of 16 bushels to a boat before noon each day, reported oystermen up and down the river last week.”
The author said “REPORTED oystermen” to give the subconscious of the reader the green light to say “oh, those oystermen must have reported that incorrectly!” The propagandist knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The article continues: “We are catching our limit by noon every day and they are beautiful oysters,” said oysterman David Robberecht of Cheriton on Virginia’s Eastern Shore.
For the 2017-18 season, the Virginia Marine Resources Commission (VMRC) passed a law allowing only two licensed watermen per boat. “They thought they were conserving the resource, but most of those watermen with licenses went out and bought themselves a boat,” said D. Robberecht. “We are seeing more boats this year than ever before and I think that’s the reason for it.”
Can you see how Mr. Robberecht is gymnastically avoiding the bounty of Oysters, and instead pinning the doubling of the Oyster fleet on a technicality by the Feds? With the truth being that the guys (and of course gals) all bought their own boats because the bounty of oysters supports the move.
Not all scallop fishermen are generational Satanists like Robberecht, of course, but those who get quoted in mainstream news articles certainly are.
The propagandist from the Rappahannock Record makes no mention of the fact that the booming oyster population there is part of a wider trend taking place regardless of geography. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
They also don’t offer any insight as to what is driving the booming of the oyster population in Rappahanock and the surrounding area. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
In January 2018, Undercurrent News masterfully spun the headline “NOAA to open New England scallop areas, invite record harvest.”
Where “record” harvest is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of statistics that would provide specific insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here. Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
The propagandist from Undercurrent News has scrupulously and deviously omitted mention of all the other record scallop harvests that have been occurring, and uses a plausible-deniability excuse at the local level to give the Feds credit for teeing this one up with “opening up closed areas”.
Remember, we learned previously that the first scallop spawn of the season in Martha’s Vineyard in 2017 was “another spectacular success”.
And now, just three years later, the article I got that quote from has been scrubbed from the web.
In September 2018, Seafood Source said “2019 scallop season will likely see bignumbers”.
Can you see how “big numbers” is general? As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda. Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, this hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the scope of the positive change I’m documenting here.
“Likely” is a hedge.
The article goes to say “The 2019-2020 scallop season will likely see record numbers of scallops landed, according to surveys by the New England Fisheries
Can you see how “record numbers”, while more informative, is still general? We’ve now learned that the headline has walked record scallop numbers back to scallop numbers that are merely “big”.
“Likely” is a repetition of the previously-used hedge.
In October 2018, undercurrent news said “New England fishery staff optimistic about another big scallop year.”
Can you see how “big scallop year” is general? As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda. Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, this hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the scope of the positive change I’m documenting here.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “amazed”. That’s why the article goes on to say: “As amazing as the 2018 New England scallop harvest has been, the 2019 season could be just as great.”
The author has gymnastically avoided saying “will be even better”.
The article continues: “From a biological perspective – the outlook is good for next year,” Jonathan Peros, the NEFMC’s lead fishery analyst for Atlantic sea scallops, told Undercurrent News.”
Since the article we reviewed just previously documented a record number of scallops for the 2019-20 season, we know that the Illuminist talking-head shill quoted in the mainstream news article has walked “great” back to merely “good”.
I’ve exposed his duplicity by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
Here’s Jonathan’s picture:
(Jonathan Peros, Lead Fisheries Analyst, Scallops, NEFMC)
I’ve provided his photograph so you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
Jonathan tacked the hedge “from a Biological perspective” on the front end of his statement to give the reader the uneasy feeling that there is some other unspoken perspective from which the scallop outlook is not good.
Jonathan went on to say: “The fishery could achieve a harvest similar to 2018 levels in the coming year.”
Remember, the Seafood Source let us know that the 2019-20 scallop season was projected to be the largest in all history.
(Atlantic scallops, 2018)
The article continues:
“Speaking of the 2018 scallop season, it’s been one for the books. Based on the estimate of nearly 39 million pounds of scallops landed as of Sept. 13, the NEFMC staff has conservatively projected the fishery will finish the year with 56m pounds, Peros told the council at a meeting late last month. And counting the carry over and scallops harvested for research and observer purposes, the volume of landings could climb to 60m, Peros told Undercurrent. That would be an improvement of nearly 13% over the 53.4m lbs landed in 2017.”
The Atlantic scallop harvest increased 13% from 2017 to 2018, from 53.4 million pounds to 56 million pounds. Both years were all time records.
The article continues: “Despite the abundance of scallops, the price at the Buyers and Sellers Exchange, the seafood auction in New Bedford, Massachusetts, appears to have ratcheted way up at the end of the year.”
That’s proof that Capitalism as it is described does not exist, and price fixing is in place, at least as far as scallops are concerned.
While controlling the press organs of all the nations in lock-step might at first appear an impressive achievement, you can see how it really can’t do anything to stop, or even remotely slow the great positive changes that I’m documenting here.
Jeff Miller, Pittsburgh, PA, August 5, 2021
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
