Delbert Grady: Your son has a very great talent. I don’t think you are aware how great it is. That he is attempting to use that very talent against your will.
Jack Torrance: He is a very willful boy.
Delbert Grady: Indeed he is, Mr. Torrance. A very willful boy. A rather naughty boy, if I may be so bold, sir.
Jack Torrance: It’s his mother. She, uh, interferes.
Delbert Grady: Perhaps they need a good talking to, if you don’t mind my saying so. Perhaps a bit more. My girls, sir, they didn’t care for the Overlook at first. One of them actually stole a pack of matches, and tried to burn it down. But I “corrected” them sir. And when my wife tried to prevent me from doing my duty, I “corrected” her.
From the script of the film “The Shining”, written by Stanley Kubrick, Diane Johnson, and Stephen King, 1980
THE DATA
From 2019 to 2021, Americans trust in tech companies to do the right thing decreased by 19%.
From 2020 to 2021, Amercians trust in tech companies to do the right thing decreased by 3%.
In 2021, just 39% of Americans had a great deal or fair amount of trust in the federal government to handle either domestic or international affairs. The international trust number is the lowest in Gallup’s history of asking the question.
In February 2021, for the first time, fewer than half of all Americans acknowledged any kind of trust in the mainstream media.
In February 2021, 56% of Americans agreed that journalists and reporters are purposely trying to mislead people by saying things they know are false or gross exaggerations.
In December 2021, Harvard University’s Chair of Chemistry and Chemical Biology was convicted of lying about receiving a salary of $50,000 per month, living expenses of up to $150,000 and more than $1.5 million to establish an only-generally-described “research lab” at China’s Wuhan University of Technology.
Here’s a list of some of Dr. Lieber’s most recent publications:
-
Nanowire probes could drive high-resolution brain-machine interfaces, 2019
-
Single-cell profiles of retinal ganglion cells differing in resilience to injury reveal neuroprotective genes, 2019
-
Precision electronic medicine in the brain, 2019
-
Nano-enabled direct contact interfacing of syringe-injectable mesh electronics, 2019
-
Scalable ultrasmall three-dimensional nanowire transistor probes for intracellular recording, 2019
THE ARTICLES
In February 2021, Forbes said “Fewer Americans Than Ever Before Trust The Mainstream Media”.
Author Andy Meek goes on to say "For the first time, Edelman’s annual trust barometer, which it shared with Axios, revealed that fewer than half of all Americans acknowledge any kind of trust in the mainstream media. Fifty-six percent of Americans, for example, said they agreed with the following statement: “Journalists and reporters are purposely trying to mislead people by saying things they know are false or gross exaggerations.”
In December 2021, justice.gov said “Harvard University Professor Convicted of Making False Statements and Tax Offenses”.
Can you see how the headline is written in a completely neutral way? What Harvard professor? What sort of Harvard professor? Making false statements about what?
The propagandist from the Department of Justice knows that, since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, this technique goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the fact that it’s Dr. Charles Lieber, who was paid huge money to help the Chinese add four amino acids to a bat virus of theirs to make it more transmissible to humans.
The subhead reads “Dr. Charles Lieber found guilty of concealing his affiliation with the Wuhan University of Technology and his participation in China’s Thousand Talents Program”.
Can you see how the subhead is written in an almost completely general way? What sort of professor is Dr. Charles Lieber? What affiliation does he have, precisely, with Wuhan University?
Then follow ten paragraphs of legal claptrap, before you finally get to “Under the terms of Lieber’s three-year Thousand Talents contract, WUT paid Lieber a salary of up to $50,000 per month, living expenses of up to $150,000 and awarded him more than $1.5 million to establish a research lab at WUT. In 2018 and 2019, Lieber lied to federal authorities about his involvement in the Thousand Talents Plan and his affiliation with WUT.”
For grade school children researching this subject in the future, asking the average American to read ten paragraphs of Department of Justice claptrap is like asking someone from the 1800’s to memorize the Declaration of Independence.
It’s the only time in the article that the only-generally-described “research” lab is mentioned. Almost every article on the subject describes him as “a famed Harvard nanotechnology expert”. They refuse to use his title, Chair of Chemistry and Chemical Biology.
Bioinformaticshome.com says “Another colleague of Church and Nowak, Charles Lieber who studies nanotechnology has a more direct link with Wuhan. According to a report in Science, he has been arrested on 28 Jan for making false statements on a collaboration with China. In the affidavit by FBI special agent, Robert Plumb, against Lieber, there was something fishy going on between the professor and Wuhan Institute of Technology (WUT). He was supposed to carry out advanced nanowire-based lithium ion batteries for high performing vehicles with WUT and was awarded $1.5 million to do the work.”
Here, a purported “truthteller whistleblower”, FBI special agent Robert Plumb, shakes the doll, dances about and points toward “nanowire-based lithium ion batteries”. It’s a misdirection, as you can see from the paragraph that follows:
"However, Lieber has no track record in batteries and in recent years his research was more focused on using nanotechnology to probe the brain toward the future of brain-machine interfaces. Below is a selected list of Lieber’s publications (title and year) with connection to the brain or central nervous system.
-
Nanowire probes could drive high-resolution brain-machine interfaces, 2019
-
Single-cell profiles of retinal ganglion cells differing in resilience to injury reveal neuroprotective genes, 2019
-
Precision electronic medicine in the brain, 2019
-
Nano-enabled direct contact interfacing of syringe-injectable mesh electronics, 2019
-
Scalable ultrasmall three-dimensional nanowire transistor probes for intracellular recording, 2019
Lieber’s work was featured in a Science Daily’s article on the future of mind control.
Strangely, Charles Lieber’s Google’s Scholar page has also malfunctioned and pointed to someone else’s publications.
What was the “brain hacker” doing in Wuhan where he established a secret laboratory? Could this be a cover up for something far more serious? Does this have something to do with Wuhan-400 bioweapon from the novel, ‘The Eyes of Darkness’? Read below an excerpt of the novel. Note the “virus”, “battery” and “brain” in one sentence.
Or maybe the work of a psychic or writer under psychedelic influence to reveal a sinister brain-machine interfaces experimentation alongside a pandemic to bring it to everyone’s attention. Did you know, Danny, a young boy and main character of the ‘Eyes of Darkness’, has psychic power? Now you know."
The main character in “the Shining” is named Danny, and “the Shining” is an only-general reference to Danny’s psychic power. The source of the Evil in the novel “the Shining” isn’t the Overlook Hotel, it is presumed-victim Danny.
“The Chinese tested it on God knows how many political prisoners. They were never able to find an antibody or an antibiotic that was effective against it. The virus migrates to the brain stem, and there it begins secreting a toxin that literally eats away brain tissue like battery acid dissolving cheesecloth.”
Dean Koontz ‘The Eyes of Darkness’ "
Here, a grotesque physical malaise is mentioned, to distract from the real driver, which is spiritual. The tell is “literally”…they piled on, and I caught them at it.
It’s not about destroying your brain…it’s about making you a zombie. Or perhaps simply destroying your innate psychic abilities (see: “Zombie”, previous).
In February 2022, news.gallup.com said “COVID and Americans’ Trust in Government”.
Can you see how the headline is written in a completely neutral way, so that you cannot tell what effect, if any, the barely-covert international release of a Chinese bat virus with four amino acids added for improved transmissibility to humans is having upon Americans’ trust in Government?
Author Frank Newport goes on to say “A recent in-depth review published in the prestigious British medical journal The Lancet, in part using Gallup World Poll data, demonstrated a significant correlation between trust in government and COVID-19 infections.”
Can you see how the first sentence of the article is written in a completely neutral way, so that you cannot tell what effect, if any, the barely-covert international release of a Chinese bat virus with four amino acids added for improved transmissibility to humans is having upon Americans’ trust in Government?
After a bunch more smoke-blowing, Frank coughs up: “higher levels of trust (government and interpersonal) had large, statistically significant associations with fewer infections for the entire study period.”
Wow! That’s a mighty Satanic inversion, there. Gallup.com’s Frank Newport widened his eyes to simulate honesty and said, with a straight face: “Trusting people are less infectable”.
He’s gymnastically trying to cover up the plain truth that, the more people are laid low by the weaponized pathogen, the less trusting they are of the people who released it upon them.
In April 2022, axios.com said “Americans’ trust in tech companies hits new low”.
Author Ina Fried went on to say "Globally, the tech industry remains the most trusted sector of business, earning the trust of 74 percent of those served, ahead of healthcare and education. By contrast, social media is the lowest ranked sector, trusted by only 44 percent of respondents.
However, only 54 percent of Americans trust tech companies to do the right thing, down three percentage points from last year and a whopping 19 points since 2019."
She said “down three percentage points” and “a whopping 19 points” in a desperate attempt to try to spin it to the positive. You score “points”.
From 2019 to 2021, Americans trust in tech companies to do the right thing decreased by 19%.
From 2020 to 2021, Amercians trust in tech companies to do the right thing decreased by 3%.
Jeff Miller, Honolulu, HI, May 17, 2022
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
