The U.S. Maternal Mortality rate has doubled in the last 20 years.
In October 2016, Science Daily widened its eyes to simulate honesty and explained “Why American infant mortality rates are so high”.
Where “so” high is general, to blunt your understanding of the scope of the technology-driven increase in infant mortality in the U.S.
The article continues: “It has been widely reported that the United States has a relatively high infant mortality rate compared with other developed countries”.
Where “relatively” high is general, to blunt your understanding of the scope of the technology-driven increase in infant mortality in the U.S. “It has been widely reported” give the subconscious of the reader the green light to say “oh, that must have been reported incorrectly!” The propagandist knows that most readers will grasp any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The headline says the article will tell you why, but the article doesn’t actually tell you why. That’s an example of a propaganda technique known as “the bait and switch”. Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it’s also an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
Science Daily is a state Propaganda outlet, pretending it knows nothing about the fact that non-ionizing radiation from technology is driving an exponential increase in infant mortality, regardless of geography.
In March 2017, slate.com said “The U.S. infant mortality rate is falling, but still worse than peer nations”.
The author used “falling” because it’s general, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer. “Worse” is also general, as is “peer nations”. Everything possible is being done to cloud your picture of the phenomenon I’m documenting here. That’s because more detailed study of “peer nations” would would show that infant mortality rates were higher in nations with higher levels of technology in place.
The article continues: “The U.S.'s relatively high infant mortality rate is one of the darkest stains on the nation's public-health record.”
Where “relatively” high is general, to blunt your understanding of the scope of the technology-driven increase in infant mortality in the U.S.
The article continues: “new data released Tuesday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows that the U.S. infant mortality rate has fallen 15 percent in the past decade, a promising signal that improvements in health-care policies and access are making an impact. Between 2005 and 2014, the rate decreased from 6.86 to 5.82 infant deaths per 1,000 live births, a decrease of 15 percent.”
Can you see how “new data released Tuesday by the CDC” is actually data that is three years old? They’ve gone back to right before the huge technology-driven increase in infant mortality began in earnest, to paint a picture exactly the opposite of what is happening.
I would argue that the decrease in mortality seen from 2005 to 2014 is due to the Orgonite-driven in the etheric environment at large, and only later did the ever-stronger and larger technical environment produce enough Death energy to drive the infant mortality rate back up.
Please recall that the damage from radiation is cumulative and dose dependent, regardless of what form of radiation we’re discussing. So there’s also the element of enough phone users using their so-called “smart” phones for enough years to drive the trend.
In October 2017, americashealthrankings.com spoke of “The Rise In Infant Mortality Rate In Ohio”, and said that “A new report by the Ohio Health Department reveals that the infant mortality rate rose slightly in 2016 when compared to the previous year”.
Where “slightly” is general. As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda. The author is trying to “compartmentalize” the technology-driven increase in infant mortality in Ohio by keeping you from realizing its scope.
They used “rise” and “rose” because they’re general, and because they’re softer than “increase”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black-Sun cult that’s ruled things in all the nations, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
The infant mortality rate in England and Wales increased 2.7% from 2017 to 2018.
In April 2017, the hilariously-named childrenshealthdefense.org said “Study Finds DTP Vaccine Increases Mortality In Young Infants 5 To 10 Fold”.
They’ve started the headline with “study finds” so that your subconscious can grasp the straw of “oh, it was just one study!”
The propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
In April 2017, maternal mortality in at Tamale Teaching Hospital in Ghana was said to be “on the rise”.
They used “rise” because it’s general, and because it’s softer than “increase”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black-Sun cult that’s ruled things in all the nations, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
In June 2017, the Journal of the American Medical Association asked “Why Is US Maternal Mortality Rising?”, and stated that “it is possible that some of the increase in maternal mortality is due to better record keeping.”
The Journal of the American Medical Association is stating with a straight face that the technology-driven doubling of maternal mortality in the U.S. over the last twenty years is due to “better record keeping”.
They’re a mouthpiece of the State, using conscious deception with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.
In July 2017, OBG Management asked “Is Pregnancy-Related Mortality on the Rise?” OBG Management is questioning whether the doubling of maternal mortality from 2000 to 2020 did, in fact take place.
They’re a propaganda mouthpiece, using conscious deception with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty, in an attempt to stifle awareness of a technology-driven doubling of maternal mortality in the U.S. over the last twenty years.
In October 2017, Unicef said “Newborn deaths made up 46 per cent of all child deaths, an increase from 41 per cent in 2000”.
Did you notice how they presented the numbers, but carefully omitted the far more impactful percentage increase between them? That’s an example of a propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”, used here to blunt your understanding of the scope of the increase in technology-driven newborn deaths. So, I had to do the math.
Newborn deaths as a percentage of all child deaths increased 12% from 2000 to 2017.
Unicef did not provide any insight as to what might be causing this see-the-needle-moving increase in infant mortality, regardless of geography. They’re a State propaganda organ, using conscious deception with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.
THE TECHNOLOGY-DRIVEN INCREASE IN CHILD MORTALITY
In October 2017 it was stated that “Up to 8,000 deaths a year may be caused by rising bed-blocking”.
NON-IONIZING RADIATION IS DRIVING AN INCREASE IN OVERALL MORTALITY
There was a general improvement in the age-standardised mortality rate in the U.K. from 2001 to 2011.
The death rate of Americans aged 25 to 34 increased 29% from 2010 to 2017.
The mortality rates in England between 2012 and 2014 were slightly higher than expected if the earlier downward trend had continued.
“Free Exchange” said that mortality among middle-aged whites continued to “rise” in 2014 and 2015, “contributing to” what was called a “fall” in life expectancy among the population, and that economic shocks were more likely to be lethal “in America”.
Where the notably-white victims are obscured by the general “America”. As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda.
There was a clear increase in the mortality rate in the U.K. in 2015.
“Excess” deaths in 2015 “may be” linked to “failures in health and social services”.
In 2013, 7% of European countries had a decrease in female life expectancy. In 2014, female life expectancy at birth decreased in 82% of European countries, year over year.
The percentage of European countries which had a decrease in male life expectancy was 17% in 2013, and 57% in 2014.
Even more countries had falls in life expectancy at older ages in 2015. For females, life expectancy at age 65 fell in 25 EU countries, and it fell in 21 countries for males.
(Calculate percentage of EU countries where life expectancy fell, male vs. female. - ed)
Life expectancy in the U.S. decreased 0.1 years in 2015.
The mortality rate in England increased 5% in 2015. This was the biggest year-on-year increase in deaths since the 1960s. And there was a larger increase in female death rates than males.
The mortality rates in the U.K. for 2015 and 2016 were around 10% higher than expected.
Infant mortality in Venezuela increased 30% in 2016. The increase was described in the headline as “sharp”, while, while lurid, is general. As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything.
That’s why an Atlantic article from June 2016 is headlined “America's Mysterious Rising Death Rate”.
They’re a Mouthpiece of the State, using conscious deception with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty to assert they know nothing about the fact that technology is driving exponential increases in mortality.
U.S. life expectancy dropped for the third straight year in 2017, a trend that hadn’t been observed in 100 years.
In 2017, Britain's long-falling death rate was said to have “leveled out”, “A blip or something”.
In March 2017 the Wall Street Journal said “Death Rates Rise for Wide Swath of White Adults, Study Finds”.
Where they used “rise” because it’s general, and because it’s softer than “increase”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black-Sun cult that’s ruled things in all the nations, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
They’ve finished the headline with “study finds” so that your subconscious can grasp the straw of “oh, it was just one study!”
The propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything.
That’s why a National Hog Farmer article from May 2017 is headlined “Increase in U.S. sow mortality a real mystery”. The article goes on to say “A noticeable trend among hog producers around the globe is a steady climb in sow mortality, particularly in the past three years.”
They’ve brazenly said it has been a “steady climb”, which is then directly refuted by “particularly in the last three years”. The propaganda outlet is trying to blunt awareness of the steep recent increases in technology-driven mortality. “Noticable” mitigates, implying that the increase is just barely noticeable, and the headline’s “increase” is general, masking any specific insight into the trend.
An article from August 2017 said that “climate change” could “raise” mortality in the U.S.
In October 2017, Wilmington Healthcare said that “rising” mortality was linked to “delayed discharge”.
12.4% more people died in England and Wales than was usual during the first seven weeks of 2018. The author of the article said “an investigation is needed”
The overall mortality rate in the U.K. increased 3% in 2019.
An article from 2017 is headlined “Explaining The Rising Death Rate In Middle-Aged White People.”
Where they used “rising” because it’s softer than “increasing”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black-Sun cult that’s ruled things in all the nations, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
In August 2017, the U.K.’s Guardian said that there was an “alarming rise” in early deaths of young adults in the north of England, and that the reasons behind the trend were “unclear”.
They used “rise” because it’s general. As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda. The author is blunting specific insight into the magnitude of the technology-driven increase mortality in the north of England. “Rise” is also used because it’s softer than “increase”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black-Sun cult that’s ruled things in all the nations, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
In December 2017, the National Institute of Health widened its eyes to simulate honesty and assured “Researchers find increase in global mortality rates associated with seasonal flu”.
Where “seasonal flu” is a bullshit plausible-deniability excuse, put forward because the propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The NIH is using conscious deception with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty to obscure the technology-driven increase in mortality rates being seen regardless of geography.
In December 2017, NBC said “US life expectancy decreases for second straight year as overdose deaths soar”.
Where “decreases” is general. They’ve referred to it only generally to blunt your awareness of the scope of the hideous, technology-driven increase in deaths that they’re hiding behind the plausible-deniability smoke screen of “soaring overdose deaths”. “Soar” is also general, and, pervertedly, used here for positive spin. That’s how you write when your bloodline has literally worshipped Death, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
The author has written it in that general and misleading way because they know that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines. It’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”. They’ve used a plausible-deniability excuse because they know that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “staggering”.
That’s why the subhead reads: “The life expectancy in the U.S. dropped for the second straight year in 2016 as deaths from drug overdoses rose a staggering 21 percent.”
Where they used “rose” because it’s softer than “increased”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black-Sun cult that’s ruled things in all the nations, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
And where the also-general “dropped” is used to once-again blunt awareness of the scope of the hideous, technology-driven increase in deaths.
The article continues: “The government figures released Thursday put drug deaths at 63,600, up from about 52,000 in 2015. For the first time, the powerful painkiller fentanyl and its close opioid cousins played a bigger role in the deaths than any other legal or illegal drug, surpassing prescription pain pills and heroin.”
Where “up” and “bigger” are both general. They mention that fentanyl played a “bigger” role in “the deaths”, but that’s pure witchcraft. Do they mean “role in the extra deaths from all causes”? Or do they mean “role in the overdose deaths”. It’s unknowable, it’s misleading.
"This is urgent and deadly," said Dr. Brenda Fitzgerald, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The opioid epidemic "clearly has a huge impact on our entire society."
Can you see how she’s using lurid generalities? And how drugs are painted as the entire driver of the huge, historically-unprecedented increase in deaths, to the highest level in history?
Here’s Brenda’s picture:
(Brenda Fitzgerald, Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
I’ve included it so you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of significant influence looks like. She’s using conscious deception with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty, and, yes, she’s reading a teleprompter.
The article continues: “The highest drug death rates were in ages 25 to 54. Preliminary figures for 2017 showed the rise in overdose deaths continuing.
Last year also marked the first time since 1962 – 1963 that the U.S. life expectancy fell two consecutive years.”
Where “highest” is general. They don’t want you to have any details about how much higher the death rate is among that core of technology users.
They used “rise” because it’s general, and because it’s softer than “increase”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black-Sun cult that’s ruled things in all the nations, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
Where “fell” was used because it’s general, and because it’s softer than “dropped” and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer.
The article continues: “A baby born last year in the U.S. is expected to live about 78 years and 7 months, on average, the CDC said. An American born in 2015 was expected to live about a month longer, and one born in 2014 about two months longer than that.”
Can you see how they brazenly inverted an exponentially-increasing death rate as “month(s) longer”? “A month longer” and “two months longer” are hedging generalities, put forward to blunt your insight into the scope of the increase in technology-driven deaths. So, I had to do the math. It’s a decrease in life expectancy of .106% from 2015 to 2016, and a decrease in life expectancy of .212% from 2014 to 2015. Can you see how they cut it up into two pieces, to blunt your awareness of the scope of the technology-driven decrease in life expectancy? That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The article continues: “The nation’s leading killer was heart disease. Overall, there were more than 2.7 million U.S. deaths in 2016, or about 32,000 more than the previous year. It was the most deaths in a single year since the government has been counting.”
If the nation’s leading killer was heart disease, why does the headline shrill about overdoses?
You might have noticed that “about 32,000 more” is general, to blunt your insight into the scope of the technology-driven increase in deaths.
The article continues: “The CDC also reported that West Virginia continued to be the state with the highest drug overdose death rate followed by Ohio and New Hampshire.”
The author used “reported” to give the subconscious of the reader the green light to say “oh, but that’s just one report!” The propagandist knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The article continues: “Life expectancy for men decreased to about 76, but held steady for women at 81. Suicide in the U.S. rose in 2016 and gun deaths also increased for a second year.”
Where “decreased to about 76” is general, to blunt your insight into the scope of the technology-driven decrease in life expectancy.
The author said that suicide “rose” because it’s general. They’re doing what they can to blunt your insight into the scope of the increase in technology-driven suicide. It’s also a reference to the Atonist Black Sun cult that’s run things in all the nations, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
The only-generally documented “increase” in “gun deaths” is curious, at best, given that violent crime levels are dropping exponentially at this time.
The article continues: “The U.S. ranks below dozens of other high-income countries in life expectancy, according to the World Bank. Highest is Japan, at nearly 84 years; the lowest is South Africa at 57.”
The author has used the general “below dozens of other countries” to cloud the fact that the death rate is far higher in the countries with the most technology.
The article continues: “The infant mortality rate in the U.S. was also low compared to other high-income countries.”
Buried at the bottom of the article, the general “low” blunts insight into the scope of the technology-driven increase in infant mortality, and hides the fact that infant mortality is far higher in the nations with higher levels of technology.
“The 10 leading causes of infant death in 2016 accounted for 67.5 percent of all infant deaths in the United States,” the report stated.
If the number of deaths in the U.S. increased by 32,000 year over year from 2015 to 2016, and the number of overdose deaths increased by 11,600, that leaves 20,400 extra unexplained deaths. Thus, only 36% of the extra deaths are from overdoses, yet the headline says “US Life expectancy decreases for second straight year as overdose deaths soar”.
Where “soaring overdose deaths” is said to be the main driver, when in fact the main driver, 64% of the extra deaths to the highest level in all history is caused by technology, something that the CDC and NBC are both desperately trying to conceal by hopping up and down, waving and pointing to “overdose deaths”.
The size, fertility and longevity of any organism very directly with the health of its etheric environment.
If you'd like to be added to this free mailing list, please send me a note at [email protected].
