Louis Winthorpe III: The Dukes…ruined my life…over a bet. For how much?
Billy Ray Valentine: A dollar.
Louis Winthorpe III: One…dollar. Fine. If that’s the way they want it - no problem.
[cut to Louis in the den, cleaning and loading an array of shotguns]
[image]
(Dan Ackroyd as Louis Winthorpe, III, from “Trading Places”, 1983)
THE DATA
Women who consumed the most sugar have a cardiovascular disease mortality rate that is 195% greater, or almost double those who consumed the least sugar.
Men who consumed the most sugar have a cardiovascular disease mortality rate that is 34% greater than that of those who consumed the least sugar.
The 195% increase in mortality among women who consumed the most sugar, versus those who consumed the least, is 474% greater, or over five times greater than the 34% increase in same among men.
Sugar’s deadly effect is over five times as great among women as it is among men. Why?
Consumption of the most sugar by white people is accompanied by a 167% increase in cardiovascular disease mortality, compared to those who consumed the least sugar.
Consumption of the most sugar by black people is accompanied by a 29% decrease in cardiovascular disease mortality, compared to those who consumed the least sugar.
The 267% increase in cardiovascular disease mortality among whites who consumed the most sugar compared to whites who consumed the least sugar is 675% greater than the 29% decrease in cardiovascular disease mortality among blacks who consume the most sugar, compared to blacks who consume the least sugar.
First author Quanhe Yang, Ph.D. described it as “However, we observed a marginally significant interaction between percentage of calories from added sugar and race/ethnicity (P = .09), and the pattern of this association was observed in other groups but not among non-Hispanic blacks”.
Sugar is far, far more deadly to the Neanderthal race, the Caucasian race, the white race, than it is to the black race. In fact, sugar has a palliative effect on the black race. Why?
When combined with high physical activity, the highest level of sugar consumption is accompanied by a 112% increase, or more than doubling of cardiovascular disease mortality, versus those with high activity who consumed the least sugar.
When combined with low physical activity, the highest level of sugar consumption is accompanied by a 54% increase, or well more than doubling of cardivascular disease mortality, versus those with low physical activity who consumed the least sugar.
When combined with high physical activitity, the highest sugar consumption is accompanied by a 107% increase, or a doubling in cardiovascular disease mortality, compared to those with the highest sugar consumption who have low physical activity (112% vs. 54%).
What is the mechanism by which high physical activity significantly increases cardiovascular disease mortality among those who consume the most sugar, versus those with low physical activity who consume the same excessive amount of sugar?
In the USDA’s “Healthy Eating Index”, the foods that are the worst for you (whole grains, refined grains, dairy, sodium, added sugars, saturated fats, and fatty acids) all have a score of 10, while the foods that are the best for you (fruits, vegetables, greens and beans, total protein foods, and seafood and plant proteins) all have a score of 5.
In this Satanically-inverted world, the highest numerical score “wins”, is judged “the healthiest”.
But don’t just take my word for it.
When combined with a “healthy eating index” in the top 50%, the highest level of sugar consumption was accompanied by a 196% increase in cardiovascular mortality, compared to those with the highest level of sugar consumption who did not have a healthy eating index.
When combined with a “healthy eating index” in the bottom 50%, the highest level of sugar consumption was accompanied by a 80% increase in cardiovascular mortality.
Those who consumed the most sugar who were in the top 50% of the healthy eating index had cardiovascular mortality rates 145% greater, or well more than double that of those those who consumed the most sugar and were in the bottom 50% of the healthy eating index.
THE ARTICLES
On November 29, 2019, clevelandheartlab.com said “The Not-***So-***Sweet Link Between Sugar and Heart Disease”.
Where the uncredited author used the general “not so sweet” as Mil-speak to avoid saying “sugar consumption doubles your risk of heart disease”.
For those unaware, anytime an author is uncredited, it is proof that said author is an Intelligence agent.
The uncredited Intelligence agent from the State propaganda organ known as clevelandheartlab.com went on to say " In one 15-year study*, people who got 25% or more of their daily calories from added sugar were more than twice as likely to die from heart disease as those who ate less than 10% of their calories as sugar."
Using a time-honored propaganda technique, the author used the general “more than twice as likely” and, in journalistic parlance, “buried” the information in a study in a separate link.
So I had to read a separate article.
In April 2014, first author Quanhe Yang, Ph.D. published “Added Sugar Intake and Cardiovascular Diseases Mortality Among US Adults” in JAMA Internal Medicine.
It goes on to say “Among US adults, the adjusted mean percentage of daily calories from added sugar increased from 15.7% (95% CI, 15.0%-16.4%) in 1988-1994 to 16.8% (16.0%-17.7%; P = .02) in 1999-2004 and decreased to 14.9% (14.2%-15.5%; P < .001) in 2005-2010.”
From 1988 to 1994 vs. 1999 to 2004, the percentage of daily calories from sugar consumed by adults in the United States increased by 7%, from 15.7% to 16.8%.
From 1999 to 2004 vs. 2005 to 2010, the percentage of daily calories from sugar consumed by adults in the United States decreased by 11.3%, from 16.8% to 14.9%.
From 1988 to 1994 vs. 2005 to 2010, the percentage of daily calories from sugar consumed by adults in the United States decreased by 5%, from 15.7% to 14.9%.
From 1994 to 2010, the average annual decrease in sugar consumption in the United States was .31%.
From 2004 to 2010, the average annual decrease in sugar consumption in the United States was 1.88%.
From 2004 to 2010, the 1.88% average annual decrease in sugar consumption in the United States was 506% greater, or more than six times greater than its .31% average annual decrease there from 1994 to 2004.
The decrease in sugar consumption in the United States is increasing exponentially, going forward in time.
That’s because moral and mental health vary directly with that of the subject’s etheric environment.
Women who consumed the most sugar have a cardiovascular disease mortality rate that is 195% greater, or almost double than those who consumed the least sugar.
Men who consumed the most sugar have a cardiovascular disease mortality rate that is 34% greater than that of those who consumed the least sugar.
The 195% increase in mortality among women who consumed the most sugar, versus those who consumed the least, is 474% greater, or over five times greater than the 34% increase in same among men.
Women are far more deleteriously effected by sugar than are men. Why?
Consumption of the most sugar by black people is accompanied by a 29% decrease in cardiovascular disease mortality, compared to those who consumed the least sugar.
While consumption of the most sugar by white people is accompanied by a 167% increase in cardovascular disease mortality, compared to those who consumed the least sugar.
The Neanderthal race, the Caucasian race, the white race is far more deleteriously effected by sugar than is the black race. Why?
When combined with high physical activity, the highest level of sugar consumption is accompanied by a 212% increase, or more than tripling of cardiovascular disease mortality, versus those with high activity who consumed the least sugar.
When combined with low physical activity, the highest level of sugar consumption is accompanied by a 154% increase, or well more than doubling of cardivascular disease mortality, versus those with low physical activity who consumed the least sugar.
When combined with high physical activitity, the highest sugar consumption is accompanied by a 38% increase in cardiovascular disease mortality, compared to those with the highest sugar consumption who have low physical activity (212% vs. 154%).
What is the mechanism by which high physical activity significantly increases cardiovascular disease mortality among those who consume the most sugar, versus those with low physical activity who consume the same excessive amount of sugar?
In the USDA’s “Healthy Eating Index”, the foods that are the worst for you (whole grains, refined grains, dairy, sodium, added sugars, saturated fats, and fatty acids) all have a score of 10, while the foods that are the best for you (fruits, vegetables, greens and beans, total protein foods, and seafood and plant proteins) all have a score of 5.
The highest numerical score “wins”, is judged “the healthiest”.
That’s why, when combined with a healthy eating index in the top 50%, the highest level of sugar consumption was accompanied by a 196% increase in cardiovascular mortality, compared to those with the highest level of sugar consumption who did not have a healthy eating index.
When combined with a healthy eating index in the bottom 50%, the highest level of sugar consumption was accompanied by an 80% increase in cardiovascular mortality.
Those who consumed the most sugar who were in the top 50% of the healthy eating index had cardiovascular mortality rates 145% greater, or well more than double that of those who consumed the most sugar and were in the bottom 50% of the healthy eating index.
The overall HEI-2015 score is made up of 13 components that reflect the different food groups and key recommendations in the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans for ages 2 years and older.
Overall, a higher total HEI score indicates a diet that aligns better with dietary recommendations.
HEI-2015 Total and Component Scoring Standards
The HEI-2015 components can be considered as a set of scores, each of which measures compliance with a different aspect of the Dietary Guidelines. Each of the 13 components is assigned a standard for achieving a maximum score. The components are then summed to get the total HEI-2015 score: a maximum of 100 points. The HEI components are weighted equally because all aspects are considered equally important. Some areas of the diet are represented by two components and assigned a maximum of 5 points each. All other components receive a maximum of 10 points.
For example, fruit is represented by 2 components: Total Fruits and Whole Fruits. Each component can receive a maximum of 5 points with a total of 10 points for the fruit component of the diet.
The components and scoring standards are shown in the table below titled HEI-2015 Components and Scoring Standards.
[image]
Given that we’re dealing with literally-blood-drinking Generational Satanists who have worshipped Death all the way back to Babylon, and before, the foods that are the best for you - fruits, vegetables, greens and beans, total protein foods, and seafood and plant proteins - all have a score of 5.
While the foods that are the worst for you - whole grains, refined grains, dairy, sodium, added sugars, saturated fats, and fatty acids - all have a score of 10.
Read it with me again: “Overall, a higher total HEI score indicates a diet that aligns better with dietary recommendations.”
Here’s how they explain it: “Some areas of the diet are represented by two components and assigned a maximum of 5 points each”.
That sentence coming immediately after they’d just said " The HEI components are weighted equally because all aspects are considered equally important."
In the USDA’s “Healthy Eating Index”, the foods that are the worst for you (whole grains, refined grains, dairy, sodium, added sugars, saturated fats, and fatty acids) all have a score of 10, while the foods that are the best for you (fruits, vegetables, greens and beans, total protein foods, and seafood and plant proteins) all have a score of 5.
The highest numerical score “wins”, is judged “the healthiest”.
[image]
Jeff Miller, Libertyville, IL, November 30, 2022
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
