THE BREAKING OF THE GREAT ARTIFICIAL DROUGHT
Great positive changes are underway at every level of our reality. They began in earnest in 2012, and have been increasing in speed and magnitude. I began writing this series of articles, entitled "Positive Changes That Are Occurring", in July of 2013.
These historically-unprecedented positive changes are being driven by many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices based on Wilhelm Reich's work.
Since Don Croft first fabricated tactical Orgonite in 2000, its widespread, ongoing and ever-increasing distribution has been unknitting and transforming the ancient Death energy matrix built and expanded by our dark masters, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. And, as a result, the Ether is returning to its natural state of health and vitality.
One of those positive changes is that the Great Artificial Drought has been broken by the slow, steady, widespread and ever-increasing distribution of simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices in the vicinity of the weather warfare infrastructure that many still mistakenly presume only carries cell phone traffic and weather radar data.
That’s because rainfall levels vary directly with the health of the Ether.
In retrospect, it was right when the big microwave tower went up on South Mountain, looking down over town.
The Death energy-based network was and is used for not only for drought creation, but also for storm steering and augmentation. They had that function working perfectly by 1992, when Hurricane Andrew was pumped up to an insane level and steered around like a bumper car.
It's an ancient "technology" - famed Black magician John Dee was proudly said to have conjured the great storm that wrecked the Spanish Armada, and so he did! The history books don't mention that it was human sacrifice Deaths that provided the energy for the, er, Operation.
By the early 2,000’s, with the assistance of the constant aerosol operations which have been underway since the late 1990's, the skies were a flat white, and it would hardly rain at all. When it would rain, it was pelting, to an extreme level I’ve never seen. My Uncle, Bob and I were the only people I know of who noticed or commented on all of this as it was going on.
The weather warfare system reached its peak with Hurricane Katrina in 2005, with only a few controlled-opposition "honeypot" websites even mentioning the technology. All said it was "scalar", and none mentioned Death energy or Dead Orgone Radiation. Mike Judge’s “Idiocracy” was released the next year.
By 2012, the Great Artificial Drought had been broken. The critical mass of Orgonite devices had reached a point where it could neutralize and transform the the body of Death energy deliberately created and distributed by the infrastructure that many still mistakenly presume only carries cell phone traffic and weather radar data.
At this writing, in July 2020, rainfall levels are at the highest levels since recordkeeping began.
AUSTRALIA
Curtin Springs, Australia had its highest September daily rainfall on record on October 2, 2017.
In December 2017, Australia’s “Sky News” spoke of “Flooding across Vic after record rainfall”.
Where, under the false guise of familiarity, they abbreviated “Victoria” to make the subject drastically less searchable. The article continues the tale of woe:
“Victoria is on high alert as rain eases, however the risk of flooding remains across parts of the state.”
Tale of woe, continued: “Rains are expected to ease in Victoria after a summer's worth of rain fell in 24 hours, causing flash floods and forcing people from their homes.”
Life-giving, historically-unprecedented rain is painted as a destroyer. The author uses the general “summer’s worth of rain”, and withholds any specific information – what the amount was, how much higher than the old record it was, when the old record was set, et al.
The author makes no mention of what drove Victoria’s highest rains in history.
In January 2018, Australia’s Cairns Post unleashed a deviant tour de force with “ ‘Dry year’ but waterwise residents ‘tighten the tap’ ”.
They used the alliterated “tighten the tap” as a slick ruse that they’re entertaining writers, when in fact they were bending over backward to not use the honest words “used less water”.
The article continues: “Cairns residents are becoming more water wise, with city's water consumption dropping in 2017 ‘despite dry conditions’.
The headline starts with “dry year”, which is as strong a generality as the propagandist could risk, given that there was no beloved “drought” to report upon.
Curtin Springs, Australia had its highest September daily rainfall on record on October 2, 2017. In December 2017, Australia’s “Sky News” spoke of “Flooding across Vic after record rainfall”.
Since no one reads much, or remembers anything, the Trusted Authority Figure is able to falsely and generally claim that 2017 in Australia was a “dry year”, in the face of the very facts to the contrary which I’ve presented, and their lie is hoped to go down in history as the truth. The Trusted Authority Figure “The Cairns Post” told a Big Lie with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.
Not everyone who works there is a generational-Satanist insider, but those at the top of the control pyramid there certainly are. It’s how the few have controlled the many, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
The author brazenly goes on to claim that claim that people were using less water “ ‘despite’ dry conditions”. Where “dry conditions” is, once again, the strongest lie the propagandist can tell, given that “drought” is something that simply couldn’t be claimed.
People were using less water to water lawns because it was raining plentifully. The author lied by suggesting that people were using less water as a conservation measure.
So, let’s say it was “dry”. You’d use less water in that case, as a responsible citizen. Here the author Satanically inverts it, and the mind and psyche of most readers is so twisted and upside down that they gobble the article right down.
In January 2018, the rain that was said not to have been occurring continued, as Western Australia Today said “Summer rain ‘smashes’ Perth weather records with ‘wettest’ January in 18 years”.
Followed by “Perth has had its ‘wettest’ January day in 18 years after ex-Cyclone Joyce drenched South West WA on Monday.”
They’re daring you to stop reading the boring article, which they deliberately made boring by having the first line of the article read almost exactly like the headline. Kids have short attention spans. It doesn’t take much to piss a kid off. The subconscious is said to be “childlike”.
The article continues: “The Bureau of Meteorology said the Perth rain gauge has received 96mm since 9am Monday. This is ‘nearly ten times’ the January ‘average’ of 9.7mm.
According to the Bureau of Meteorology, Rottnest Island has ‘broken’ its January rainfall record, with 103.4mm falling by 9pm on Monday.”
Where the author has carefully omitted what the previous record was, or when it was set. They put forward the smaller margin between the average and the record, and then hedged again by saying “nearly ten times” instead of “almost 1,000% higher”.
The Trusted Authority Figure says “it was a cyclone”, but doesn’t go into how it could be ten times more rain-filled than any previous cyclone in history. They also don’t mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
The data on the previous record is buried way down at the bottom of the article, in a separate table. I don’t know what the figures are, but if only 30% read the article, I’d guess at least half of those won’t read the information in the table.
Perth's wettest days (for the Perth Metro weather station)
February 10, 2017 - 114.4mm
January 22, 2000 - 104mm
June 10, 1920 - 99.1mm
January 15, 2018 - 96mm
July 29 1987 - 95mm
I we presume that the primary driver of rainfall is the relative health of the Ether, that would mean that, by the late 1980’s, Perth’s Etheric environment had climbed back up to where it hadn’t been since the 1920’s. Now, the Earth was said by some at that time to be heading for a great positive transformation of some sort in 2012, the end of the “Age of Iron”. I believe “Technology” was and is a massive effort to stop, thwart or slow that positive change.
By 2017, the Etheric environment in Perth was at a level never seen previously, in that the rainfall record of 2017 is 20% above 1987, and 15% above 1920.
CANADA
The Ottawa, Canada all time daily snowfall record, from February 6, 2017, was 51.2 cm, 23% higher than the previous record of 40.6cm set in 1947. The record stood for seventy years, and then was suddenly broken by a huge margin.
Ottawa, Canada’s current daily snowfall record for February 12, from 2017 is 28cm, 15% higher than the previous 24.4cm record from 1988. The record stood for almost 30 years, and then was suddenly broken by a large margin. The author used the neutral “breaking the record” to describe a 15% increase.
Toronto, Canada’s new snowfall record for January 29, from 2019, is 97% higher than the previous record from 2009. The record stood for a decade, and then was suddenly broken by an exponential, historically-unprecedented margin.
CHINA
In January 2017, phys.org said “ ‘Scientists’ find ‘culprits’ for ‘extreme’ rainfall ‘over’ Yangtze River in May”.
Where Mouthpiece of the State “phys.org” states that bountiful rainfall is a crime. The word “extreme” is used to trigger the “extreme weather” meme that is generally used to put a recovering climate into a negative light.
“Over” Yangtze River is a hedge against saying “on Yangtze River”. The article continues:
“In May 2016, an extreme rainfall occurred in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River Valley. The area averaged anomaly of total precipitation over the region (117°-121°E, 26°-34°N) was the third ‘wettest’ on record since 1961.”
‘Wet’ is used ubiquitously in the controlled press in place of rain’, whenever possible. The other night, while watching the Golf channel, the announcer said “we’ve had a ‘weather’ delay, because he’s forbidden from saying ‘rain’. P.S. Hail or snow was not involved in the delay.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest rainfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
EUROPE
In January 2018, the U.K.’s Telegraph Satanically inverted thing by asking “ ‘Could’ too much snow spell disaster for the ski season’?’ “
The article continues “Storms and heavy snow spell ‘frustration’ for skiers as slopes across Europe stay closed”.
The generational Satanists who own ski area were given orders to close as part of a larger op that had and will have no impact on the larger trend of happy skiers frolicking in an environment that’s been restored to health.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest snowfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
ICELAND
In February 2017, Reykjavik, Iceland saw it’s biggest snowfall for 80 years. The author notes that 51cm of snow fell, but omits any mention of the previous record, only that the new record is “the most ever.”
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest snowfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
SINGAPORE
In January 2018, channelnewsasia.com said “Half of January's average monthly rainfall fell over Kim Chuan Road”.
Where, under the false guise of familiarity, the headline omits the word “Singapore”, to make the subject as unsearchable and general as possible.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest rainfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
UNITED STATES
In November 2017, weather.com said that early November snow cover in North America was the Highest “in Over a Decade”.
Where “in over a decade” is a general hedge, put forward against the actual number, “15 years”, and, even moreso, to avoid saying “since record keeping began fifteen years ago.”
In the article NOAA said that “Over one-quarter” of the area of the Lower 48 had snow on the ground on Nov. 8, 2017, the “largest” areal coverage of snow on that date. Where both “over one-quarter” and “largest” are both general, put forward as hedges against far more impactful statistics.
“This is the largest areal coverage of snow on that date in at least 14 years, according to NOAA data.”
Where “in at least 14 years” is general, put forward as a hedge against the far more impactful statistic, which I was forced to do the math to learn. The author included the old and new records, but hedged again by carefully omitting the far more impactful percentage increase between them. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
Since they’ve used the general “over one quarter”, I’m going with 26% for the new record. With that, we’ve learned that snow cover increased 5% in the U.S. to it highest level ever recorded. The author hedges again by making no mention of when the previous record was set, doing everything they can to blunt and minimize awareness into the phenomenon. Remember, this is an at-least 5% increase in snow coverage. Such records are usually broken by tiny margins.
The author said it was the “most expansive” Nov. 8 snow cover in the Lower 48 in NOHRSC's 15-year analysis, “topping” Nov. 8, 2011's 21-percent coverage. Where “most expansive” and “topping” are both general hedges, put forward to keep you from getting a more specific idea of the scope and magnitude of the positive change we’re discussing here.
Where “topping” falsely infers that the new record was just above the old, when in fact the record was broken by a very large margin.
They author went on to say that it was a “sharp” contrast to one year ago, which was “one of the warmest Novembers on record”.
Where “sharp”, while lurid, is, once again, general. They’ve broken out the “Global Warming” meme. 2017 was officially stated to be the 2nd hottest year on record, a year in which the area covered by snow at one time increased 5% above the previous record.
In December 2017, Scientific American widened its eyes to simulate honesty and said “ ‘Scientists’ Link Hurricane Harvey's Record Rainfall to ‘Climate Change’ “.
Where “scientists” and “climate change” are both general. As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda. The Trusted Authority Figure is telling a Big Lie with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty. They’re desperately trying to keep you from realizing that rainfall varies directly with the health of the Ether.
In January 2018, accuweather.com said “ ‘Reports’: Record-‘setting’ blizzard buries New England in ‘over’ a foot of snow, brings travel to a halt”.
Where the headline begins with “reports” so that your subconscious can reject anything uncomfortable that follows with “oh, that’s just a ‘report’ “, or “that was ‘reported’ incorrectly.”
Record ‘setting’ only tersely notes that the record was set, but hedges by omitting any information as to how much. “Over” a foot of snow generalizes, so you can’t get an accurate picture of what’s going on.
“Brings travel to a halt” sets the negative tone. What else could there be to read, here? 60 to 70 percent of readers only read headlines.
ALASKA
In October 2017, webcenterfairbanks.com tersely said “Tuesday's deluge ‘set’ precipitation record in Fairbanks”. Where the hedging generality “set” was used to blunt any insight into the margin between the old record and the new. The article continues:
“Tuesday was the rainiest 24 hours for an October day in Fairbanks recorded weather history, according to a tweet from the National Weather Service. Fairbanks broke the October 24-hour precipitation record of 1.17 inches at noon, ‘with half the day remaining’.” As of 4 p.m., 1.34 inches of precipitation had fallen and it was still raining.
This is a tirelessly-used technique, in which, under the false guise of “rushing to press”, it will be announced that the record has been broken, but with a number far less than the total at the end of the storm. Even with this, the new record is 15% above the old. Such records are usually broken by tiny margins. The author hedged again by omitting mention of when the previous record was set.
An honest news organization would have refused to publish the article, but rather waited a day until the data was accurate.
In December 2017, watchers.news said “Alaska ‘records’ ‘one of’ the most ‘extreme’ snowfall rates on record
Where the word “extreme” is used to conjure the “extreme weather” meme that’s been used for the last few years to try to luridly but generally explain away the great transformation in the natural environment that’s taken place.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. Two of those variants are “astonishing” and “extraordinary“.
That’s why the article says “An ‘astonishing’ 25.4 cm (10 inches) of snow per hour was reported at Thompson Pass near Valdez, Alaska on Wednesday, December 6, 2017. This is ‘extraordinary’ even by Valdez standards, the snowiest town in the United States.”
Where “astonishing” and “extraordinary”, while lurid, are general. The author lies bald-facedly and says it was only “one of” the most “extreme” snowfall rates on record. We know they’re lying because there’s no mention in the article as to what the previous record was, or when it was set.
That’s an example of a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
ARIZONA
The new daily snowfall record for Flagstaff, Arizona for December 24, from 2016, was 10.1 inches. The author said “The 10.1 inches of snow that fell at the Flagstaff Airport broke the daily record for Dec 24”, and that the new record broke the previous record from 1916 “by 6 inches”. The author used the hedging generalities “broke” and “by 6 inches” to avoid printing the far more impactful percentage, which I was forced to do the math to learn. The record stood for a hundred years, and then was suddenly broken by 146%.
CALIFORNIA
The snow total at the Squaw Valley Ski Area in California for 2018 and 2019 was twice that seen in 2012 and 2013.
In June 2016, a record number of rattlesnakes were said to be making their way into yards in California “Due To Drought.”
In January 2017 it was said that “Climate Alarmists Will Miss California's Drought”.
In January 2017, the pervertedly named “newsdeeply.com” pervertedly said “ ‘Why’ Record Precipitation ‘May Not Be a Cure-All for California’ “
In February 2017, as snowpack piled up, “experts” said California’s drought was not over.
In February 2017, abc.com said “California's ‘wet’ weather has some ‘believing’ the drought is over”.
Where the author has used the standard meme “wet” that’s the standard in the international news blackout on the subject, in place of the word “rain” wherever and whenever it might appear.
The drought is over, but the generational Satanist author at Mouthpiece of the State “ABC” puts forward the Big Lie that it’s not, and does so with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.
In March 2017 California had record precipitation and snowpack.
In April 2017 Governor Jerry Brown declared California’s drought emergency over “for now”.
An article from April 2017 said that, while the California drought was “officially” over, the next “could be 'around the corner’.”
An article from April 2017 said that California’s drought was over, “but the Rest of the World's Water Problems are Just Beginning.”
An article from April 2017 said that “California's drought and floods are over and just beginning”
In April 2017, Wired said that California “Overcame 1/100 Odds to Beat Its Epic Drought.”
In April 2017, the controlled-opposition mouthpiece ‘wattsupwiththat’ asked “What “permanent drought”? New all-time rainfall record set for California”.
The author is pretending to be on your side, but in fact has slipped in the use of the trigger meme ‘permanent drought’. It’s almost the first thing that you read. Boom! Endorphin rush. Programming triggered.
In April 2017, the LA Times said “Northern California gets its wettest winter in ‘nearly a century’ ”.
The author used the general “nearly a century” in the headline, and then went on to omit any mention of what the previous record was, or when it was set. That’s an example of a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
An article from May 2017 said “California's drought is all but over, but some wells are still dry.”
An article from July 2017 said “The California Drought Isn't Over, It Just Went Underground.”
In October 2017, NOAA Climate.gov said “ ‘Very’ wet 2017 water year ends in California”.
In the article, we read “Across the Northern Sierra Mountains, where the highest rainfall amounts were recorded, an eight-station average of precipitation totals during the 2016-2017 water year reached 94.7 inches, the highest on record and ‘over six inches higher’ than the previous record set in 1982-83.”
Where the headline clearly describes 2017 as ‘very’ wet. “Very” is a hedge back from “record, most-ever”. The author hedges again by saying “over six inches higher”, which is general. As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda. They’ve used a hedging generality in place of a far more impactful statistic. The Mouthpiece of the State is doing what it can to lie, hedge and defray against the great positive change I’m documenting here.
So, I had to do the math. If we “over six inches” to conclude 87.5 inches, the new record is 8% higher tan the old. Such records are usually broken by tiny margins. Here, the record stood for almost forty years, and then was suddenly broken by a huge margin.
In 2017, theverge.com ruefully said “California will burn until it rains, climate change may keep rains away”.
That’s because the folks in charge in all the nations have been setting wildfires in the face of the breaking of the great artificial drought, and the chapter of this book that documents them will be among its more impactful.
In December 2017, The ‘Mercury’ News asked “ ‘Is’ California heading back into a drought’?’ “.
They’re fighting a tired rearguard action against rainfall levels exponentially above anything seen in recorded history. The name of their newspaper references one of their dark gods, Mercurius, whom they’ve worshipped under various guises, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
In December 2017, the Sacramento Bee wailed and warned that “California has ‘only 30 percent chance’ of normal winter rainfall”.
While the subhead reads “ ’Scientist’ says California has only ‘slim’ chance of normal rainfall this winter.”
Where the “Scientist” is hilarious code for “Satanist”. Now, not all scientists are generational Satanists - only those at the top of the control pyramids, and those who get quoted in mainstream news articles. It’s how the few control the many.
They figured the rubes would never catch on.
In December 2017, the Tribune said “ ‘Mild La Niña’ creating drought conditions in California”.
Another blockbuster chapter of this book will be “El Nino and La Nina”, the fabricated, quasi-magical environmental memes that have purported physical connection to small spots of cooling or warming water in the wider greatness of the Pacific Ocean.
Winter rainfall in Los Angeles increased 603% from 2018 to 2019, and was 55% above average.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “unusual”.
On January 3, 2018, the Desert Sun said “In California, it's an ‘unusually’ dry winter with ‘little’ rain or snow”.
Well, if that’s true, then how can a story from the East Bay Times from January 8, 2018 read “California storm sets rainfall records, triggers trouble in fire zones”?
It’s not true. The Desert Sun story is a bald-faced lie, which I’ve exposed by a process known as fact-checking. The paper’s name is a thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black-Sun cult that’s run things in all the nations, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
I’ll warn any lingering Conspiracy Theorists in the readership to either stop reading or head for the exits. In that another story from January 9, 2018 is headlined “Many areas across NorCal break rainfall records”, and another from that same day “NASA ‘calculated’ heavy rainfall leading to California mudslides.” Where you can see how they’re proudly trying to take credit for being, you know, all over everything, even though their multi-Trillion-dollar, Death energy based drought creation technology has been rendered useless by three-dollar hunks of resin, metal and crystal.
In January 2018, the Sacramento Bee said “Monday's rain sets all-time downtown Sacramento ‘record’ ”.
The article continues: “Here is the latest on the record-‘setting’ storm hitting the Sacramento region. The storm dumped 2.38 inches of rain to downtown Sacramento on Monday.”
To get to the old record, you have to dig down through and past NINETEEN PARAGRAPHS, and six videos. In a world where sixty to seventy percent of the populace only reads headlines, the technique effectively “compartmentalizes” the information.
“A storm originating in the Gulf of Alaska delivered 2.38 inches of rain to downtown Sacramento on Monday, ‘the most’ on Jan. 8 since the NWS began recording data in 1877. The previous record was set last year, when Jan. 8 brought 1.96 inches of rain. Before that, it was 1.51 inches in 2001.”
The number of people who do the math on the margin between the records after getting all the way down to the information has got to be in the single digits, and it’s highly probable that I’m the only living person who has done so. The new record is 21% above the old, set just a year ago. Such records are usually broken by tiny margins.
Signally, the record prior to 2017 was set in 2001, right before the literal forest of Death energy-based weather weaponry that also carries cell phone traffic and weather radar data was thrown up suddenly in all the nations in the early 2000’s.
The current record, from 2018, is 58% above the record from 2001. If you look at the increase per year from 2001 to 2017, and the increase from 2017 to 2018, you can see how the rainfall is increasing exponentially, moving forward in time.
The author provides no guess as to what might be driving the bountiful rainfall, and certainly doesn’t mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
COLORADO
Colorado Springs, Colorado set a rainfall record in July 2017 of 6.56 inches, 25% more than the previous record of 5.27 inches set in 1968. The record stood for almost fifty years, and then was suddenly broken by a huge margin.
The author provides no guess as to what might be driving the bountiful rainfall, and certainly doesn’t mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
IDAHO
In March 2017, the Idaho Statesman said “Boise's ‘winter weather’ breaks ‘some’ records, ‘falls short on others’.”
Where “winter weather” is used as a more-general hedge against the specific use of the word “snow”. It’s a standard tactic in the international news blackout that’s in place on the subject. The headline quibbles that only “some” records were broken, while others “fell short”. In yet another hedge, they said the new record “handily surpassed” carefully hedged again by omitting the far more impactful percentage increase between them. So, I had to do the math. The new record is 17% above the old. After standing for almost 40 years, the record was suddenly broken by a huge margin.
The author provides no guess as to what might be driving the bountiful snow, and certainly doesn’t mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
ILLINOIS
The current snowfall record for Chicago, IL for Halloween, set in 2019, is 3.4 inches, which is 3,300% larger than the previous record of .1 inch, set in 2014.
The record stood for half a decade, and then was suddenly broken by a quantum, historically-unprecedented margin.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest snowfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
FLORIDA
In January 2018, clickorlando.com said “Daytona Beach ‘sees’ more record rainfall”.
Where, under the false guise of familiarity, the headline omits the word “Florida”, to make the subject as unsearchable and general as possible. “Sees” steps thing back a step from actually experiencing them.
The article continues: “The National Weather Service tweeted at 10 a.m. that 1.95 inches of rain has fallen in Daytona Beach since midnight, making it the ‘wettest’ day in the city since Hurricane Irma. Daytona Beach on Tuesday ‘saw’ 1.42 inches of rain, ‘topping’ the record of 0.91 inches, set in 1953.
“Saw” steps thing back a step from actually experiencing them. The author said “wettest” day because the international news blackout on the subject strictly forbids the use of the word rain whenever and wherever possible.
The author provided only the numbers of the old and new records, along with the general “topping” the record, which clearly implies that the new record just “topped” the old. So, I had to do the math. The new record is 56% above the old, set half a century before.
Such records are usually broken by tiny margins. Here, the record stood for over fifty years, and then was suddenly broken by a historically unprecedented margin.
The author provides no guess as to what might be driving the bountiful rainfall, and certainly doesn’t mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
The new rainfall record for Tampa Bay, Florida, from January 28, 2018, was 3.31 inches, and was 117% higher than the previous record of 1.52 inches, set in 1900. The record stood for over a hundred years, and then was broken by an exponential, historically-unprecedented margin.
The author provides no guess as to what might be driving the bountiful rainfall, and certainly doesn’t mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
MAINE
The new January record for snowfall in Caribou, Maine, from 2019, is 34% above the previous record, set in 1991. The record stood for almost thirty years, and then was broken by a huge margin.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest snowfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
MINNESOTA
In March 2017, MPR News tersely said “Minnesota Annual Precipitation Record ‘Broken’
They used the terse, general “broken” to obscure any insight into the magnitude between the old record and the new. The article continues:
“Waseca, in south central Minnesota, ‘set’ the official state annual precipitation record, coming in with the ‘highest’ annual precipitation total for a National Weather Service Cooperative Observation site.
The author used the terse, general “set” and “highest” to obscure any insight into the margins between the records. The article continues:
“Waseca finished 2016 with a total of 56.24 inches, 63% of which fell between July and September, punctuated by over 10 inches of rain in two days near the end of that period. The old statewide annual record was 53.52 inches of precipitation at St. Francis in Anoka County in 1991.”
The author provided the numbers of the old and new records, but carefully hedged by omitting the far more impactful percentage increase between them. So, I had to do the math. The new record is 5% above the old. Such records are usually broken by tiny margins.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest rainfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
In January 9, 2019, MPR News said “Minnesota ‘smashes’ all-time state precipitation record in 2018”.
Where the lurid but general “smashed” is put forward to hedge against a far more impactful percentage, which has been withheld in an attempt to blunt and defray awareness of the phenomenon I’m documenting here.
“Move over Waseca. ‘It appears’ Harmony, Minn., set a brand new all-time state of Minnesota precipitation record in 2018.
Where “it appears” allows your subconscious to call it into question, believe that it didn’t even happen.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “astounding”.
That’s why the article goes on to say that “The National Weather Service cooperative weather observer in Harmony recorded an ‘astounding’ 60.21 inches of precipitation last year.”
While the author widened their eyes to simulate honesty and professed to be “astounded”, there’s no mention in the article as to what could be driving such an increase. The hedging continues:
“That 60.21-inch total ‘smashes’ the previous all-time state record of 56.24 inches set in Waseca in 2016. While the data is still preliminary and will be verified, it's very likely accurate.”
Where the lurid but general “smashed” is again put forward to hedge against a far more impactful percentage, which has been withheld in an attempt to blunt and defray awareness of the phenomenon I’m documenting here.
The author goes on to describe the margin as merely “Significant”, and a “4-inch margin above the previous record”.
So, I had to do the math. The new record is 7% above the old. Such records are usually broken by tiny margins.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest precipitation levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
MONTANA
In December 2016, Montana’s Billings Gazette said “Billings ‘breaks’ 61-year-old snowfall record for December
Where the author used the terse, general “breaks” as hedge in place of a far more impactful statistic. The article continues:
“ ‘More than 3 inches’ of snow on Friday pushed the city of Billings over a December snowfall record set in 1955 and put totals for the month ‘hovering below’ 30 inches, according to the National Weather Service in Billings. As of 4 p.m., snowfall for Friday measured 3.3 inches at the airport and put the total for December at 29.8 inches, said Julie Arthur, an NWS meteorologist in Billings.”
Where, in each case, a hedging generality is put forward prior to the delivery of the statistics. The story continues:
“Arthur said NWS records for Billings date back to 1934. "It's ‘pretty’ big," she said, of breaking the 1955 record of 28.8 inches. Snowfall for December 2016 surpassed totals for the entirety of the previous winter when Billings experienced a combined 28.1 inches of snow, Arthur said.”
Where the Illuminist talking-head shill quoted in the mainstream news article by calling the snowiest winter in history only “pretty” big. The author provided the old and new records, but hedged again by omitting the far more impactful percentage increase between them. So, I had to do the math. It’s 3.5% above the previous record.
Such records are usually broken by tiny margins. Here, the record stood for over sixty years, and then was suddenly broken by a large margin.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest rainfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
In October 2017, a record-breaking 14.8 inches of snow fell in Montana, the heaviest October snow in the state since 8.6 inches fell 1914.
The author provided the old and new records, but carefully hedged by omitting the percentage increase between them. It’s 72% above the previous record, set over a hundred years previously. The record stood for a century, and then was suddenly broken by an exponential, historically-unprecedented margin.
2017/2018’s all time high snowfall in Billings, Montana was 92% above average.
In January 2018, weather.gov said “A total of 5.03 inches of precipitation was recorded for season, which was 2.05 inches above the normal of 2.98 inches. This made it the 13th wettest winter season on record for Duluth, Montana. 50.9 inches of snow fell through the season, which was 1.4 inches above the normal of 49.5 inches.
The author said it was “above normal” to avoid saying anything about the previous record. They also took care to withhold the percentage that precipitation was above normal, so, I had to do the math. It’s 69% above average. Such records are usually broken by tiny margins.
The snow total follows the same formula. It’s a statistically very significant 3% above normal. Such records are usually broken by tiny margins.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest precipitation levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
In April 2018. climatesignals.org said “ ‘Double’ the ‘average’: Snowiest winter on record in ‘Billings’ ”.
Where, under the false guise of familiarity, the headline omits the name of the state, to make the subject drastically less searchable.
The article says “The winter of 2017/18 will ‘go down in the record books as’ the snowiest on record in Billings, Montana's largest city.” Where the out has been provided for your subconscious to believe that it was merely recorded incorrectly.
After an additional 6.6 cm (2.6 inches) of snow on April 23, Billings officially reached its snowiest winter on record, with 269.5 cm (106.1 inches) of snow so far this winter through the afternoon of April 23. The previous record for Billings took place in 2013-14 when 262.9 cm (103.5 inches) of snow fell. In an average winter, Billings sees only 140 cm (55.1 inches) of snow, making this winter’s total ‘nearly double’ the seasonal average.”
The headline said “double”, while the body text says, correctly, “nearly double”. That’s a propaganda technique known as “walking it back”.
The author provided the numbers for the old and new records, but quickly shifted the conversation to “the average”, which tack they’d set off on up in the headline. That’s to blunt and defray the impact that the margin between the records has on the readers understanding of the phenomenon I’m documenting here. And, in any case, I was forced to do the math. The new record is 2.5% above the old. Such records are usually broken by tiny margins.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest snowfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
I’d note that the previous record was set in 2013 and 2014, which is during the time period comprised by the great positive changes that began in earnest in 2011 and 2012.
In December 2018, Montana’s Great Falls Tribune said “It was a ‘record’ day ‘for’ snow in Billings on Friday with 8.9 inches, breaking the mark set for December 29 in 2010.”
Where the terse, general “breaking the mark”, and offers no further information on the previous record beyond the date it was set. That’s so you’d have research another story to learn that the previous record was . That’s an example of a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
The article also doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest snowfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s another example of the propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
In January 2018, Montana’s Bozeman Daily Record said “December brought record snowfall ‘levels’ to Bozeman ‘area’ “.
The headline hedges by saying “brought record snowfall ‘levels’ to Bozeman ‘area’, because they wanted to avoid writing the simpler and more impactful “December brought record snow to Bozeman”.
The article and the hedging continue: “Observers at the Montana State University campus station ‘reported’ 46 inches of snowfall in December, which ‘buried’ the old record of 38 inches from 2008.”
Where the author wittily noted that the new record “buried” the old, but that general hedge was carefully put forward to obscure the far more impactful percentage increase between the records, which I was forced to do the math to learn. The new record is 21% above the old. Such records are usually broken by tiny margins.
The author threw “reported” 46 inches in there so that your subconscious could reject it all with “oh, but that was just reported incorrectly!”
The article makes no mention as to what might be driving snowfall 20% higher than any ever previously seen, in all history, and certainly not that it’s part of a larger, wider trend that is occurring regardless of geography. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
NEVADA
From October 2016 to February 2017, the increase in the water level of Lake Tahoe was “greater” than the same time period in the previous nine years.
Lake Tahoe was within 3 feet of the legal limit in February 2017.
NEW YORK
In December 2017, Syracuse.com said “Syracuse ‘breaks’ snowfall record - and it wasn't ‘even’ the snowiest spot in ‘CNY’ ”.
Where “and it wasn’t even the snowiest spot in CNY” is a quibble, a hedge - something to downgrade the impact of the most snow ever in history in Syracuse. They used the false guise of familiarity to say “CNY”, so that the far more searchable “New York” could be omitted.
The subhead reads “Wednesday's snowfall in Central New York was ‘record-breaking’.” Where “record-breaking”, while factual, is general.
At Hancock International Airport, the official measuring station for Syracuse, 8.9 inches of snow fell. The old record for Dec. 13 was 5.9 inches, set in 1951.
The author provides the old and new records, but carefully hedges by omitting the far more impactful percentage increase between them. So, I had to do the math. It’s 51% above the previous record, set over 60 years previously. Such records are usually broken by tiny margins.
Here, the record stood for over sixty years and then was suddenly broken by a gigantic, historically unprecedented margin.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest snowfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
NORTH CAROLINA
In January 2018, wral.com said “Record snow at ‘RDU’; Here's how much snow fell and where”.
Where, under the false guise of familiarity, the headline omits the name of the city, Raleigh-Durham, or the State, North Carolina, or the institution, Raleigh-Durham University. This deliberately-constructed cloud of generality keeps the entirety of the populace as compartmentalized from everyone and everything else as possible. Culminating in the apogee and swan song of social engineering known as “Covid” in 2020.
For those unaware, Covid takes its name from the Old English “Covin”, which means fraud or deception.
The historically-unprecedented snow at what we now know is Raleigh-Durham is, in journalistic parlance, “buried” ten paragraphs down. In a culture where sixty to seventy percent only read the headlines, the number that get down ten paragraphs has got to be in the single digits.
“The Raleigh-Durham International Airport got 5.9 inches of snow, a new record for the date. The previous record was 4 inches, set in 1946.”
The author provided the new record and the old, albeit ten paragraphs down. Then there’s no mention of the margin between the records. So, I had to do the math. If you think the number is low who read down to the tenth paragraph, what do you think the percentage is of those who do the math?
That would be close enough to zero that the technique of compartmentalization which keeps the general populace in a state that George Orwell called “paralyzing stupidity.”
The new record is 48% above the old. Such records are usually broken by tiny margins. Here, the record stood for well over half a century, and then was suddenly broken by an historically-unprecedented margin.
The author provides no guess as to what drove the exponential increase in rainfall, and certainly makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That is, once again, the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
NORTH DAKOTA
In January 2017, North Dakota’s Bismarck Tribune said “Bismarck snow ‘beats’ records”. Where “beats” is terse, and general, and implies the new records just surpassed the old. They wrote the article on the second of January, and the accurately document the breaking of the record. However, later, there will be no followup article on the massive margin between the old record and the new, because “we already did a story on that.”
“The total accumulation of snow ‘so far’ this season — or Jan. 2 — is 53.1 inches. That is the most snowfall ever accumulated to date, according to Michael Mathews, a meteorologist at National Weather Service in Bismarck.”
Getting all this material into a tagged database will later allow the easy production of an article where dozens of examples of the same tactic can be lined up for review with one another. It’s part of the process that’s going to be required to deprogram the multitude of Coincidence Theorists who have collectively locked all of us in the prison camp that is humanity.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants includes “mind-boggling”.
That’s why a story below from the Washington Post from April 2017 says “After 63 feet of snow, Northern California mountains break record for ‘wettest’ water year – a ‘mind-boggling’ 751 inches of snow have pummeled the Sugar Bowl ski area near Lake Tahoe this winter.”
Where the term “mind-boggling”, while lurid, is general. And there’s no specific mention in the article as to what the previous Sugar Bowl snow record was, at all - and certainly not of the percentage increase between the two.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest snowfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
In October 2017, Deseret.com said “Montana just ‘experienced’ a record-breaking ‘blizzard’. ‘Here’ are the photos”.
Where “experienced” hedges it back a step. The word “blizzard” hedges again, gymnastically avoiding saying the word “snow”, a standard tactic in the international news blackout that’s in place on this subject.
“Havre, Montana, reportedly received 14.8 inches of snow Monday night — setting a new record for highest snow total in October for the area, which had hovered ‘around’ 8.6 inches.”
It’s deviant and bizarre to publish a story on snowfall records and say that one of them “hovered around” 8.6 inches. It allows the subconscious of the reader to call the whole thing into question as unscientific.
They provided the old and new records, but carefully hedged again by omitting the far more impactful percentage increase between them. So, I had to do the math. The new record is 72% above the old. Such records are usually broken by tiny margins. This is heading toward a doubling over the old record.
We don’t know when the previous record was set, as the author has hedged yet again by omitting it.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest snowfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
OKLAHOMA
In 2017, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma set a new daily rainfall record for October 4 with 2.79 inches of rain, 27% more than the previous record of 2.22 inches set in 1955.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest rainfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
In March 2017, generational Satanists at Climate Central covered for fellow generational-Satanist conspirators setting wildfires in Oklahoma with a storm headlined “Drought, Weather Fuel Record Oklahoma Wildfires”. P.S. I knew that before I checked the fact that 2017 was Tulsa, Oklahoma 26th-wettest year in 132 years.
In March 2017, generational Satanist “secret agents” were setting wildfires in Oklahoma, as evidenced by a USA Today story from April 2017, which reads “U.S. drought reaches record low as rain reigns”.
The article goes on: “ ’Poof!’ Drought, which covered almost one-third of the nation at the beginning of winter, has all but ‘vanished’. Where “poof!” And “vanished” are put forward for those not smarter than fifth graders, to make the sudden climactic transformation seem, well, magical.
“ ‘Abundant’ winter and spring rains have ‘decimated’ large regions of drought that afflicted the nation. On Thursday, the federal government’s U.S. Drought Monitor declared that only 6 percent of nation was affected by drought conditions, ‘the lowest percentage since it began its assessments in 2000’.”
Where “decimated” is highly negative, and upsetting to read. They’re the kind of slick little touches that really “punch up” a “hit-piece”.
A non-blood-drinking writer would have said “relieved large regions of drought.”
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest rainfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
OREGON
In 2017, Portland, Oregon set a rain record for October 21, with 1.62 inches, 47% more than the previous record of 1.1 inches set in 1966.
Such records are usually broken by tiny margins. Here, the record stood for almost sixty years, and then was suddenly broken by an historically-unprecedented margin.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest rainfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
In January 2018, Oregon’s Bend Bulletin said “ICYMI: Central Oregon snow officially breaks ‘a’ record”.
The propagandist writing the article knows that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines. So by saying only generally that snow breaks “a” record, they can keep a really high percentage of people from knowing anything that’s going on.
The article continues: “Central Oregon residents woke up Wednesday morning to historic ‘levels of’ snow.”
Wow! Where “historic levels” of snow is still spectacularly general. They’re daring you to stop reading the boring article, which they deliberately made boring by having the first line of the article read almost exactly like the headline. Kids have short attention spans. It doesn’t take much to piss a kid off. The subconscious is said to be “childlike”.
The article continues: “The National Weather Service in Pendleton ‘recorded’ 24 inches of snow’pack’ Wednesday at its official reporting location at the Bend Public Works Department on U.S. Highway 20 near Pilot Butte. That amount ‘broke’ the Jan. 11 snow-depth record, which was 16 inches on Jan. 11, 1993.”
Where the author provided the new record and the old, and said generally that the new record “broke” the old, which gives no idea as to the magnitude by which the record was broken. So I had to do the math. The new record is 50% above the old. Such records are usually broken by tiny margins. Yet, here, the record stood for well over twenty years, and then was suddenly broken by an historically-unprecedented margin.
The propagandist at the Bend Bulletin carefully said “ ‘recorded’ 24 inches of snow’pack’ “ to give your subconscious the out of “oh, someone recorded that incorrectly”. The additional hedge “pack” is added on to snow to infer they went where someone packed the snow up higher or thicker.
You don’t measure snowpack. You measure snow.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest snowfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
PENNSYLVANIA
In December 2017, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania’s inquirer.com said “‘Weather delay’: Snow arrives ‘late’, sets record … ‘and stays late’”. It’s a witchy piece of Black magic, in which “Weather delay” is what hooks your subconscious as you begin to read, while “sets record” is shoved in the middle, with “and stays late” tacked on the end so it’s even money you’ve spaced out on “sets record”.
“Philadelphia ‘reported’ an official 3.3 inches at 7 p.m., ‘besting’ the previous record of 2.9 for a Dec. 9, set 75 years ago.
“Reported” holds the straw out for your subconscious that “someone reported it incorrectly”, and “bested” implies that the new record only just broke the old.
Since the author hedged by omitting the far more impactful percentage increase between the records, I was forced to do the math. It’s 14% above the previous record.
The snowfall record stood for going on a Century, and then was suddenly broken by a huge margin. Such records are usually broken by a tiny margins.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest snowfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
A RabbleVID story from January 2018 says “New daily precipitation record set in Pittsburgh”.
Where “set” is neutral, general.
“Pittsburgh has ‘broken’ the daily record precipitation for January 12th with 1.64" through 5pm. This ‘breaks’ the old record set 111 years ago (1907) of 0.97”.”
The propagandist has used the general “set”, “broken” and “breaks” to blunt and defray, trying to keep you from noticing what the margin between the records actually was. The new record is 69% above the old. Such records are usually broken by tiny margins. Here the record stood for over a hundred years, and then was suddenly broken by an historically-unprecedented margin.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest rainfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
The current daily rainfall record for July 11 in Allentown, Pennsylvania, set in 2019, is 135% above the previous record, which was set in 1982.
Such records are usually broken by tiny margins. Here the record stood for over forty years, and then was suddenly broken by a gigantic margin.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest rainfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
SOUTH DAKOTA
The new snowfall record for Yankton, South Dakota, from January 21, 2018, was 14.2 inches, and was 89% above the previous record of 7.5 inches, set in 1982.
Such records are usually broken by tiny margins. Here the record stood for over forty years, and then was suddenly broken by a gigantic margin.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest rainfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
TEXAS
The 18-month period from March 1, 2015, through August 31, 2016, was the rainiest 18-month period on record for the city of Houston, Texas, with 106.68 inches, 12.2% more than the previous record.
Such records are usually broken by tiny margins. The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest rainfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
In 2017, Amarillo, Texas set a rainfall record for August 9 of 2.41 inches, 43% more than the previous record of 1.69 inches set in 1939.
Such records are usually broken by tiny margins. Here the record stood for over seventy years, and then was suddenly broken by a gigantic margin.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest rainfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
In December 2017, fox59.com said “It’s snowing in South Texas. Yes, you read that right.”
They wrote it that way to avoid saying “Houston breaks all time snow record with earliest seasonal snowfall on record”.
Where “It’s snowing in South Texas” completely generalizes the facts of the situation, to their most neutral level possible.
The article begins: “Big and fluffy snowflakes fell across parts of south Texas on Thursday, including San Antonio and Austin.”
Where “Big and fluffy snowflakes fell” while accurate, is obviously a blatant general hedge against “Houston breaks all time snow record with earliest seasonal snowfall on record”. They threw in “parts of” South Texas to minimize it even further.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “unusual”.
That’s why the article goes on to say that, while snow is common in “parts of” north Texas, it's “unusual” for this region to see snowfall. And, once again, they said that it was only “parts of” South Texas”, to minimize it even further.
The author said “This rare snow event isn't over yet. It's moving farther south to cities like Corpus Christi and Brownsville. They are expected to get snow throughout the night with 2-3 inches possible around Corpus Christi.”
Under the false guise of “rushing to press”, they’ve published the story prior to the breaking of the record, so that a very embarrassing headline doesn’t have to be written.
Snow records are being broken in South Texas, in what is purported to be the second hottest year in history.
UTAH
In January 2018, the Salt Lake Tribune said “Rain ‘Records’, ‘Avalanche Warning in Utah’ ”.
They threw “avalanche warning” on the end because the story has to be about something negative, and something other than record precipitation. The propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw to avoid personal responsibility, and here the uncomfortable reader will focus on the avalanche warning and turn the page. The propagandist also knows that sixty to seventy percent of the populace only reads the headlines.
The article continues: “In southern Utah, the .93 inch of rain ‘recorded’ in St. George tied the record set in 1905. Cedar City, Fillmore and Bryce Canyon Airport all set new precipitation records. Cedar City's .21 inch shattered the old mark of .04 set last year. The .51 in Fillmore topped .42 set in 1978. Bryce Canyon's .30 topped .24 in 1955.”
Where the author led with a record that tied the old, then moved on to the higher margins. In all cases, they took special care not to do the math, as providing far-more-impactful percentages is forbidden in the international news blackout on the subject. The word “recorded” is used to give your subconscious the out of “oh, they must have recorded that incorrectly!”
The author uses the lurid but general “shattered” the old mark to describe an historically-unprecedented margin of 424% in Cedar City. The 21% margin in Fillmore is describe with the blatant hedge “topped”, which firmly implies the new record just beat the old. Here, the record stood for decades and then was suddenly broken by a huge margin. Bryce Canyon’s record stood for a half century, was broken by a statistically gigantic 25%, and “topped” was once again used to blatantly hedge and defray.
Such records are usually broken by tiny margins. Here the record stood for over a hundred years and then was suddenly broken by an historically-unprecedented margin.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest rainfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
WASHINGTON
In August 2017, the Washington Post said “Rainless in Seattle: ‘City has longest streak on record without rain’ - Seattle, the city known for its gray, rainy skies, hasn't seen a drop in 51 days.
The story, while factual, is a quote taken violently out of context, as you can see from a Curbed Seattle story from just five months later, in January 2018: “Seattle just finished its ‘wettest’ four years on record”. The meme ‘wet’ is used in the controlled press whenever possible to avoid using the term “rain”.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest rainfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
In December 2017, spokesman.com said “Friday’s snowfall breaks daily record ‘at airport’; ‘streets remain icy as full-city plow continues’
Under the false guise of familiarity, the headline omits any mention of where this record took place. That’s an example of a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”. It makes the subject almost completely unsearchable. For the record, it’s Spokane, Washington.
Where “breaks daily record ‘at airport’ ” is a hedge, implying that it only snowed heavily right at the airport, vs. across the region.
“Streets remain icy” closes the thought, and pulls the mind of the mouth-breaking headline reader off onto bitching about the weather, away from the historically unprecedented snowfall.
“On Friday, 7.1 inches fell, as measured at Spokane International Airport, crushing the record of 4.8 inches set on the same date in 1963.”
Where the author uses the lurid but general “crushing” the record to avoid at all costs printing the far more impactful percentage increase between them.
So I had to do the math. It’s 48 percent above the previous record. Such records are usually broken by tiny margins. Here the record stood for close to sixty years, and then was suddenly broken by a gigantic margin.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest rainfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
In January 2018, Washington’s Bellingham Herald said “ ‘Record’ rain ‘for’ Thursday, ‘but guess what’s coming Sunday’ “
The article continues “Rainfall of .93 inch was ‘recorded’ Thursday, January 11 at Bellingham International Airport. That ‘breaks’ the daily rainfall record of .61 inches that fell January 11, 1971. Heavy rainfall ‘isn’t unusual’ in January, which is one of Western Washington’s Wettest Months.”
They’ve shaken the doll of “guess what’s coming Sunday” in the headline to immediately take your attention away from the rainfall record. On the back end of the data, they’ve assured that “heavy rainfall ‘isn’t unusual’ for January”.
Knowing that there’s literally no chance in hell you’d do the math, they’ve just tricked you into not noticing that the new rainfall record is 53% above the old. Such records are usually broken by tiny margins. Here the record stood for longer than most readers have been alive, and then was suddenly broken by an exponential margin.
It’s a very impactful statistic, which is why the controlled press makes every effort to keep them from the public.
The author used “recorded” early in the article to give your subconscious the out that “oh, it was just recorded incorrectly”.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest rainfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
WASHINGTON, D.C.
In December 2017, wtop.com said “ ‘Brief’ winter wonderland: Record snow totals and ‘what to expect next’.”
Under the false guise of familiarity, the headline omits any mention of where this record took place. That’s an example of a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”. It makes the subject almost completely unsearchable. For the record, it’s Washington, D.C.
“Brief” winter wonderland kicks us off with “it won’t last!”, and “what to expect next” pulls the subconscious of the mouth-breaking headline reader off onto the future they are supposed to think about, and off of the record that’s been sandwiched in between.
“The D.C. area ‘felt’ a wave of winter weather Saturday, its first significant snowfall in December since 2013. The day's weather ‘even’ broke snowfall records in all three of the region's airports.”
Where “felt” a wave of weather is deviant, and bizarre, hedging a giant step back from “experienced”. “The day’s weather ‘even’ broke snowfall records” tacks what should be the lead item of the story onto the very back end of the blathering.
“Storm Team 4 Meteorologist Steve Prinzivalli said Saturday’s snowfall broke records at Dulles International Airport (4 inches), BWI Marshall Airport (2.6 inches) and Reagan National Airport (2 inches).”
This story does not say a word about what the previous records were, or when they were set. That’s another example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest rainfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s another example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
In December 2017, weather.com snidely said “Saturday's snowfall ‘set’ records, ‘but it was only 2.4 inches’.”
Under the false guise of familiarity, the headline omits any mention of where this record took place. That’s an example of a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”. It makes the subject almost completely unsearchable. For the record, it’s Washington, D.C.
An historically unprecedented weather event, described snidely as “but it was only 2.4 inches”. The author makes no mention of what the previous record was, or when it was set.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest snowfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
WISCONSIN
In October 2017, yourdailyglobe.com said “Friday snow, rain brings ‘record’ precipitation”. Where, under the false guise of familiarity, the headline omits any mention of the location, to make the subject virtually unsearchable. For the record, they’re talking about Wisconsin. The terse “record” precipitation is as general as possible, and hedges against providing awareness into the wider trend I’m documenting here. The article continues:
“The 8 inches of snow that fell when rain turned into snow on Friday set an Oct. 28 record for Ironwood, according to the National Weather Service office in Marquette.”
The author says a record was set, but no more.
“Another 2 inches fell for the 24-hour period to 7 a.m. Sunday, making the weekend's snowfall 10 inches. About half of Friday's wet stuff fell as rain and the precipitation total of 1.63 inches for the period also set a single-day ‘record’.”
The author has mentioned another record was set, but won’t mention what it is. The article continues:
“Precipitation for October now stands at 5.59 inches, compared to the 116-year ‘average’ of 3.67 inches.”
They’ve compared the new record to the average, but carefully omitted mention of the previous record, while still trying to confuse you into thinking they’re being scientific, and stuff. The article continues:
“The ‘monthly’ record snowfall through Oct. 30 is the 26.7 inches that was measured in 1967, according to the NWS.” Where the author has now moved to discussion of the monthly record, again to avoid having to document what the previous precipitation record was, and when it was set.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest snowfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
WYOMING
March 15, 2017 – At Jackson Hole Mountain Resort the total snowfall received at the 9,580-foot elevation in Rendezvous Bowl from December 1, 2016, through February 28, 2017, was 390 inches. The Rendezvous Bowl weather site has the longest continuous record of snowfall on the upper mountain, and the record snowfall at that site for December through February is 417 inches, or almost 35 feet of snowfall. That was during the winter of 1996-97. The winter of 2016-17 is now ‘the second-snowiest “winter season” on the mountain, in its 40-some years of weather records. All other winters are a distant third’.
In early March 2017, Rendezvous Bowl’s snow depth reached 158 inches. That ‘beat’ the old deepest snow depth record of 157 inches, which occurred in late March 1997.
“Water-wise: During the three months of the winter season 2016-17 Jackson had an astonishing 11.85 inches of precipitation, almost a foot of precipitation. That ‘completely washed away’ the previous record from the wettest winter ever in Jackson. The old record was 9.28 inches of water from the winter of 1964-65.”
The author used the general “completely washed away” as a hedge against providing the far more impactful percentage increase between the records, to blunt awareness of the wider trend I’m documenting here. The new record is 28% above the old. Such records are usually broken by tiny margins. Here, the record stood for almost sixty years, and then was suddenly broken by an exponential margin.
The article continues:
“February 2017 accounted for almost half of this winter’s total precipitation, with 5.75 inches. That is “five times” the average for February of 1.14 inches and “more than double” the previous record precipitation of 2.83 inches for February, set back in 1962.”
The author did what they could to hedge by saying “more than double” instead of providing a far more impactful percentage. So, I had to do the math. 2016/17’s total precipitation was 404% above average, and 103% more than the previous record, set almost sixty years before. Such records are usually broken by tiny margins. Here the record stood for over half a century, and then was broken by an exponential margin.
“As for temperature, ‘it may not seem like it recently’, but winter 2016-17 was colder than normal, overall. December was quite cold, with a mean temperature — the average of high and low temperatures — that was 6 degrees lower than normal. January was even colder; with a mean temperature that was ’11 degrees below the long-term average’. February ‘made up for some of that temperature deficit’, coming in almost 7 degrees above normal.”
They said “it may not ‘seem’ like it ‘recently’ ” because of the incessant “hottest years in history” programming.
“ ‘Temperature deficit’ shows there’s an agenda.
“Comparing temperatures from that other wet winter of 1964-65 with this winter, the biggest difference was that ‘1964-65 was warm all three months.’ It rained in December 1964, with high temperatures in the lower 40s. It rained in January 1965, with highs also in the lower 40s. It rained in February 1965, and high temperatures reached 50 degrees on Feb. 4, 1965. This winter, we never hit 40 degrees in December or January, and the winter’s highest temperature was 44 degrees on Feb. 16, 2017.”
So it was warmer 50 years ago, yet mechanical, carbon-driven Global Warming is purported to have occurred in the time since. What gives? The only thing to do to preserve the programming is narrow your eyes and bitterly affirm “yeah, but that’s ‘there’ “.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest snowfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
On May 18, 2017, Cheyenne Wyoming broke a snowfall record with 11 inches, 120% more than the 5 inches that fell in 1915.
Such records are usually broken by tiny margins. Here the record stood for over a hundred years, and then was suddenly broken by a gigantic margin.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest snowfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
On May 9, 2017, Cheyenne Wyoming broke another snowfall record, with 3.3 inches, 10% more than the 3 inches that fell in 1915.
Cumulatively, the storm from 2017 dumped 66% more snow than the storm from 1915. The record stood for almost a hundred years, and then was broken by an exponential, historically-unprecedented margin. The author uses the hedging generality “broke” the record to describe a 66% increase.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest snowfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
UNITED KINGDOM
In July 2017, the U.K.’s Telegraph said “Met Office warns Britain is heading for 'unprecedented' winter rainfall”.
Where “unprecedented”, while accurate, is general. As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda. The article continues: “Britain is heading for "unprecedented" winter rainfall after the Met Office's new super computer predicted records will be broken by up to 30 per cent.
The article doesn’t offer a guess as to what’s driving the highest rainfall levels in all history, and also carefully makes no mention that it’s part of a larger, wider trend. That’s a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
